Page 9993
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
The Influence of Career Outcome Expectations and Career Interests
on Career Readiness among Secondary School Students in Johor,
Malaysia
Nursyawalina Sulong
1
, Mastura Mahfar
2
1,2
Department of Educational Sciences and Behavioral Science, Faculty of Educational Sciences and
Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000815
Received: 11 October 2025; Accepted: 18 October 2025; Published: 18 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine the influence of career outcome expectations and career interest (RIASEC) on
career readiness among Form Four secondary school students (N = 462) in Johor, Malaysia. A set of
questionnaires was utilised as the research instrument, and data analysis was conducted using SPSS 29.0.
Reliability analysis confirmed acceptable internal consistency. Descriptive results indicated that most students
demonstrated a moderate level of career readiness (68%). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the
combination of career outcome expectations and career interest accounted for 29.9% (R² = 0.299) of the variance
in students’ career readiness. Career outcome expectations emerged as the strongest predictor (β = .446, p < .05),
while Investigative (β = .126, p < .05) and Conventional = .109, p < .05) career interests also had significant
positive effects. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening school-based career guidance and
targeted interventions, while noting that the convenience sampling and cross-sectional design limit the
generalizability of the results.
Keywords: career readiness, career interest, RIASEC, career outcome expectations, secondary school
INTRODUCTION
Careers play a significant role in human well-being by providing purpose, self-worth, financial stability, social
connection and overall life satisfaction (Chang et al., 2023; Hamzah et al., 2022; Vieira et al., 2021). While
career readiness has been widely examined among graduates and individuals entering the workforce, its
importance among secondary school students has received less attention, as studies on this group often prioritise
academic outcomes(Chen et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2024; Yousef, 2024).
Career readiness is defined as a set of diverse attitudes, behaviours, and abilities that enable individuals to
navigate occupational tasks successfully, ensuring a smooth transition to the workforce (Wang et al., 2024). This
includes engagement in career planning, exploration, decision-making, developing confidence, skills and
competencies (Azhenov et al., 2023; Gustina et al., 2024; Tang, 2019). Individuals who demonstrate career
readiness are typically empowered with financial literacy, self-efficacy, employability, networking skills and
adaptability (Alfaiz et al., 2021; Moore & Thaller, 2023; Musa & Mat Rashid, 2020). Given the rapid
technological shifts in today’s labour market, preparing adolescents with such competencies has become vital
(Shaari et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2021).
Global studies show that career readiness among adolescents remains inconsistent. For example, The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report revealed that in 15 of 19 longitudinal
studies, students who engaged in career planning during adolescence secured better future careers (OECD,
2024). Yet, many 15–16 year olds failed to state their potential job at age 30, signalling weak career planning.
Similarly, research in Australia found that 59% of students aged 15–18 were unsure about their career choice
(Gleeson & Walsh, 2023), while in Armenia, schools responded by implementing a structured 15 week career
planning module (European Training Foundation, 2022). Collectively, these findings suggest that many
adolescents remain uncertain about their future careers, underscoring the importance of embedding career
Page 9994
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
readiness initiatives early in secondary education to enhance preparedness for post-secondary transitions and
employability.
In Malaysia, most studies on career readiness have concentrated on university students and vocational college
graduates (Mahmud, 2017; Musa & Mat Rashid, 2020; Yeop Kamarudin & Mohd Kosnin, 2022), leaving
adolescents at the secondary school level relatively underexplored. In addition, previous Malaysian studies have
tended to focus on fragmented aspects of career readiness such as career exploration (Nor Hazwani Halim &
Sahid, 2020; Rong et al., 2024) and career choice (Abd. Karim & Mohd Rasdi, 2021; Ashari et al., 2019; Wong
et al., 2023).
This study addresses this gap by examining career readiness among secondary school students within the
Malaysian context, specifically in Johor, a rapidly developing industrial state (Amar et al., 2023). This is
concerning given that Johor faces pressing issues related to adolescent employability. Abu Rahim et al. (2023)
reported that the Southern Region recorded the highest percentage of undereducated youth (13.3%), while Johor
had the highest proportion of individuals aged 15 to 19 already in employment (15.6%) as reported by the
Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM, 2024). These figures raise concerns about premature workforce entry
without adequate readiness. Since today’s labour market requires at least post-secondary qualifications (Balfanz
& Byrnes, 2019), secondary school students must develop readiness not only for employability but also for
successful transition to higher education (Agherdien, 2014; Villares & Brigman, 2019).
In line with this, Fajaryati et al. (2020) asserted that possessing essential skills and knowledge that align with
local market demands will help residents contribute significantly to economic progression. The long-term
implications of weak readiness are further supported by a study in Malaysia by Abu Rahim et al. (2023), which
found that youth without tertiary education face significant challenges in securing jobs that match their skills
and qualifications, even 100 months after completing secondary school. Consequently, their likelihood of being
hired is less than 20%. The study also showed that students with early career readiness recognise the value of
tertiary education in securing better employment, higher salaries and job satisfaction.
This study therefore aims to investigate the combined influence of career outcome expectations and RIASEC
career interests on the overall career readiness of Form Four students in Johor. In doing so, it contributes new
insights into adolescent career development and informs targeted interventions to prepare Malaysian youth for
future educational and occupational pathways.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Career Interests and Career Readiness
Beyond the importance of career readiness itself, this study also examines two key predictors, career outcome
expectations and career interests. Both are critical psychological factors that shape adolescents’ career
behaviours (Lent & Brown, 2006; Sheu et al., 2010)
Career interest refers to tendencies toward specific career characteristics (Pham et al., 2024) and plays an
important role in career development (Lent & Brown, 2006). Holland et al. (1973) stated that career interest is
expressed through personality traits related to occupation, hobbies and certain activities. These personality traits
are categorised into six types known as RIASEC (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising,
Conventional). Each category is described as follows:
1. Realistic: Occupations involving practical and physical activities (e.g. mechanic, carpenter, pilot and
athlete)
2. Investigative: Occupations involving skills in mathematics and science, data analysis and exploration
activities (e.g. data analyst, psychologist, researcher and scientist)
3. Artistic: Occupations involving creative activities, self-expression and imagination (e.g. dancer, architect,
photographer and writer)
4. Social: Occupations involving helping others, becoming mediators and enjoying communication with
others (e.g. counsellor, nurse, social worker and teacher)
Page 9995
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
5. Enterprising: Occupations involving leadership, delivering speeches, approaching others to influence and
persuade (e.g. entrepreneur, lawyer, financial adviser and sales executive)
6. Conventional: Occupations involving data management and administration (e.g. accountant, administrator,
logistics manager and office clerk)
Past research has consistently demonstrated a significant link between career interests and aspects of career
readiness. For instance, Ajayi et al. (2023) in a study of 204 Grade 12 students in South Africa, found that
Enterprising (β = .251, p = .003), Social (β = .123, p = .045), and Artistic (β = .170, p = .006) interests positively
influenced career decision-making, with the overall model explaining 42.1% of the variance (Adjusted =
.421). Extending beyond decision-making, Donnay and Borgen (1996) in their study of 18,951 employed adults
across 50 occupational groups, showed that all six RIASEC themes significantly predicted occupational group
membership, with Wilks’s λ values ranging from .775 to .886 (all p < .00005). Multivariate analysis explained
approximately 65% of the variance (Wilks’s λ = .35) and achieved hit rates of 10–11%, nearly five times greater
than chance. Similarly, in a longitudinal validity study by Hansen and Dik (2005) with 241 university alumni
found strong evidence for the 12-year predictive validity of the Strong Interest Inventory, an instrument grounded
in Holland's RIASEC themes. The results showed that 58% of participants' eventual occupations aligned with
their initial interest assessments, a rate significantly higher than the 26% expected by chance. This predictive hit
rate was more than double the chance expectation rate of 26%, a statistically significant difference (p < .001).
Taken together, these studies demonstrate that RIASEC interests influence both immediate career decision-
making and long-term occupational choice, underscoring their pivotal role in shaping career readiness across
diverse educational and cultural contexts.
Career Outcome Expectations and Career Readiness
While career interests shape the domains toward which students are drawn, career outcome expectations
influence how they evaluate the potential consequences of pursuing those domains. According to Bandura
(1977), outcome expectations together with self-efficacy shape human behavior. Bandura (1986) further stated
that outcome expectations arise from observations of situations and events in an individual’s environment, as
well as from the perceived consequences of actions taken. In career development, outcome expectations develop
career goals, actions and processes along the career path (Lent et al., 2017), predict the effects of future career
goals (Korkmaz & Yam, 2023) and influence their involvement in career-related tasks and choices (Abdul Karim
et al., 2024).
Previous studies have confirmed the association between career outcome expectations and aspects of career
readiness. A study by Qotimah and Wardani (2022) on 151 university students in Syaria Accounting in Indonesia
found that career outcome expectations have a significant influence on career choice, = 0.374, p <.000).
Another study by Caesarani et al. (2021) on 505 undergraduate students and professional dental students in
Indonesia, revealed that career outcome expectations have a significant direct effect on career exploration,
β=0.151 (p<.006). Wong et al. (2023) study on 318 public and private university students in Malaysia also found
that career outcome expectations have a strong effect on career choice = 0.564, p <.01). These findings
substantiate the significant impact of career outcome expectations on career readiness.
Research Gap and Hypotheses Development
Despite this evidence, several gaps remain in the Malaysian context. Most prior studies have examined outcome
expectations and career interests separately or linked them only to specific aspects such as career choice (Ashari
et al., 2019; Wong et al., 2023), rather than considering their combined influence on overall career readiness. For
instance, Mohd Raime (2020) investigated the influence of career outcome expectations and career interests on
career choice among accounting-major university students, but did not extend the analysis to overall career
readiness. This highlights a critical gap in the literature, where the joint role of these psychological factors in
predicting adolescents’ career readiness remains underexplored, particularly in Johor, where early workforce
entry and skill mismatches underscore the need for a more holistic understanding.
Based on the above literature review and identified research gaps, the following hypotheses are proposed:
Page 9996
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
H1: Realistic career interest has a significant positive effect on career readiness.
H2: Investigative career interest has a significant positive effect on career readiness.
H3: Artistic career interest has a significant positive effect on career readiness.
H4: Social career interest has a significant positive effect on career readiness.
H5: Enterprising career interest has a significant positive effect on career readiness.
H6: Conventional career interest has a significant positive effect on career readiness.
H7: Career outcome expectations have a significant positive effect on career readiness.
METHODOLOGY
This study adopted a quantitative design. The population consisted of Form Four students (16 years old) from
public secondary schools in Johor, with 462 respondents (male = 169, female = 293) selected using convenience
sampling. This nonprobability technique involves selecting participants who are readily accessible and willing
to take part in the study (Etikan et al., 2016). Creswell and Creswell (2018) note that random sampling is often
difficult or impossible to obtain, therefore, convenience sampling is frequently used with participants selected
based on their accessibility and availability. The method was chosen because participation depended on schools
that granted administrative approval and were logistically feasible for the researcher to access within the data-
collection period. Although convenience sampling limits generalisability due to potential selection bias, it is
practical and suitable for exploratory studies where access and feasibility are key considerations (Taherdoost et
al., 2016).
The instrument used in this study was a Google Form online questionnaire which was divided into two main
sections. Section A is the demographic information. Section B is the integration of three sets of questionnaires.
First, the Student Career Readiness Index (SCRI) by Dodd et al. (2022) was used to evaluate the level of career
readiness. SCRI is a 9-item questionnaire that uses a 6-point Likert scale measuring 0 (I don’t know) to 5 (I
completely agree). According to Dodd et al. (2022), testing on a sample of 1508 students demonstrated good
factorability (KMO = 0.90) while subsequent testing on 2221 students confirmed the instrument’s construct
validity, with fit indices of CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.10. As the SCRI had not previously been applied
in the Malaysian context, the instrument was translated into Malay to mitigate cross-cultural bias, given its
Western origins.
Second, the Career Decision Making Outcome Expectancies Scale (CDMOES) by Betz and Voyten (1997) was
used to evaluate the level of career outcome expectations. CDMOES is a 9-item questionnaire that uses a 5-point
Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). A study by Betz and Voyten (1997) reported
that the CDMOES demonstrated high internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from α = 0.77
to 0.79. Subsequent local studies in Malaysia have also reported its reliability, with reported alpha coefficients
of α = 0.85 (Mohd Puad et al., 2023) and α = 0.85 (Mohamed, 2022).
Third, the RIASEC Marker Scale by Armstrong et al. (2008) was used to evaluate the level of career interests
by category (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional). RIASEC Marker Scale is a
48-item questionnaire that uses a 5-point Likert scale measuring 1 (Strongly dislike) to 5 (Strongly like).
According to Armstrong et al. (2008), the RIASEC Marker Scale demonstrated convergent validity through its
correlation with the General Occupational Themes from the Strong Interest Inventory, with coefficients ranging
from 0.56 to 0.72 (mean, r = 0.64). The scale also exhibited high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha
values ranging from α = 0.79 to 0.94, across all RIASEC dimensions in various sample groups. A more recent
survey by Du et al. (2024), conducted across 57 countries including Malaysia, further confirmed the scale’s
reliability, reporting a mean Cronbach’s alpha, α= 0.85.
Later, permission to distribute the questionnaire was obtained from the faculty and school authorities. Before
Page 9997
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
distributing the online questionnaire in Form Four WhatsApp groups, school counsellors were given instruction
to handle the process. The data were collected from 14 to 20 January 2025 during the last week of the 2024/2025
semester and the first week of the year-end school holiday. No personal information was collected from
respondents in order to keep the response as private and confidential. Data analysis was performed using SPSS
version 29.0.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The Reliability of Scales
The internal consistency reliability of the study variables was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha, with values
above 0.70 considered acceptable (Nunnally, 1978). The Career Readiness scale achieved a Cronbach’s alpha of
0.810 while the Career Outcome Expectations scale recorded reliability coefficient of 0.914. For the Career
Interest scale, reliability values ranged from 0.743 to 0.934 across the six RIASEC dimensions. These results
indicate that all scales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency.
Prior to the main data collection, a pilot study was conducted to evaluate the reliability of the instrument. Based
on the methodological review by Bujang et al. (2024), a pilot study sample size of at least 30 respondents is
usually adequate to estimate internal consistency and detect potential issues with questionnaire items.
Accordingly, 37 students were included in the pilot testing to assess the internal consistency reliability of the
scales before the full data collection.
Descriptive Results of Each Variable
In this section, descriptive analysis presents the frequency and percentage for the levels of career readiness,
career interest (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional), and career outcome
expectations.
Career Readiness
Table 1 shows the career readiness level among Form 4 students in Johor. The students are grouped into three
level which is low (15.4%), moderate (68.0%) and high (16.7%). Overall, the majority of students fell into the
moderate-level category, exhibiting moderate career readiness. These findings suggest that many students may
thrive with additional support to enhance their career readiness.
Table 1 Career Readiness Level
Level
Frequency
Percentage
Low
71
15.4
Moderate
314
68.0
High
77
16.7
Total
462
100.0
Although the proportion of low-level students is small, Yousef (2024) asserted that low and moderate levels of
career readiness create barriers in career paths as they hinder achievement and educational involvement,
complicate the transition from secondary school to meeting market demands, restrict career-related
competencies, weaken the ability to cope with challenges and impede the capacity to adapt to different work
environments.The high percentage of moderate-level students may be due to several factors. First, at 16 years
old, the students are in the phase of being adolescents. According to Super (1953), at this phase, students are
actively involved in career exploration and begin to make career and educational decisions. Thus, students may
still be shaping their career identities and paths. Chen et al. (2021) asserted that, high school students who engage
in career exploration activities have a holistic understanding of their interest and strength, subsequently
Page 9998
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
influencing better career decision-making. In addition, the ability to make career decision led to nurturing self-
confidence, hence creating self-awareness of future careers.
Second, career exploration is not limited to students alone. Parents, teachers and school counsellors play
significant roles by providing students with appropriate support for career awareness (Mohd Norli & Abu Bakar,
2024). The long-term implication of understanding the demands of future market job that align with career
interest enhances early awareness on relevant skills and knowledge needed to ensure employability (Yusran et
al., 2021).
In conclusion, most Form Four students in Johor demonstrated a moderate level of career readiness, reflecting
their ongoing phase of career exploration and decision-making. While this indicates some preparedness, the
findings highlight the need for continuous support from parents, teachers, and school counsellors to strengthen
students’ career awareness and equip them with the skills required for future employability.
Career Interest (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional)
Table 2 presents the overall career interest levels of students across the six RIASEC dimensions. For the Realistic
category, most students were at low (46.5%) or moderate (46.3%) levels, with only 7.1% at the high level,
suggesting limited inclination toward Realistic-related occupations. In the Investigative dimension, 23.4% of
students were at the low level, 50.4% at the moderate level, and 26.2% at the high level, indicating that many
students showed moderate to high interest in Investigative-related occupations. For the Artistic dimension, the
majority (57.8%) were at the moderate level, while 30.7% were at the low level and only 11.5% at the high level,
reflecting limited preference for Artistic occupations.
In the Social category, most students demonstrated moderate (65.2%) or high (23.6%) interest, with only 11.3%
at the low level, suggesting greater inclination toward Social-related occupations. Similarly, for the Enterprising
dimension, most students were at the moderate level (64.3%), followed by 19.7% at low and 16.0% at high
levels, indicating that strong preferences for Enterprising careers were less common. Finally, in the Conventional
dimension, the majority of students (60.4%) were at the moderate level, with 22.3% at low and 17.3% at high
levels, showing that students generally had a moderate but not dominant preference for Conventional-related
careers.
When comparing across dimensions, a clear pattern emerges in which most students demonstrated moderate
levels of career interest in five categories: Investigative (50.4%), Artistic (57.8%), Social (65.2%), Enterprising
(64.3%), and Conventional (60.4%). This suggests that while students show some inclination toward these career
interest categories, their preferences are not yet strongly developed. Exposing students to a wider range of
occupation-based experiences may therefore help foster stronger career interests and align them with future
opportunities.
Table 2 Career Interest (RIASEC) Level
RIASEC Dimension
Low (f, %)
Moderate (f, %)
High (f, %)
Realistic
215 (46.5%)
214 (46.3%)
33 (7.1%)
Investigative
108 (23.4%)
233 (50.4%)
121 (26.2%)
Artistic
142 (30.7%)
267 (57.8%)
53 (11.5%)
Social
52 (11.3%)
301 (65.2%)
109 (23.6%)
Enterprising
91 (19.7%)
297 (64.3%)
74 (16.0%)
Conventional
103 (22.3%)
279 (60.4%)
80 (17.3%)
Shougee (2024), emphasised that awareness of job earnings is essential for high school students, as it allows
them to align their career choices with financial goals. Since many students remain unaware of occupations
beyond their immediate environment, this knowledge can enhance motivation and support effective career
Page 9999
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
planning. In addition, Elias et al. (2024) highlighted that aiming for financial stability is particularly important
in the context of uncertain economic progress, helping students strive for secure futures.
Beyond career awareness, the provision of additional support through relevant skills and knowledge is equally
critical. The World Economic Forum (2025) projected that by 2030, demand for skills in artificial intelligence
(AI) and big data will rise by up to 97%, while the need for adaptability skills will increase by 78%. With
traditional roles being reshaped by automation and restructuring, lifelong learning and adaptability become
essential. Idris and Bacotang (2023) further noted that combining human-centred solutions with advanced
technologies enables students to better navigate diverse work environments.
Career counselling also plays a vital role in guiding students toward meaningful career pathways. Kurniawati et
al. (2023) found that counselling helps students identify career preferences, develop career identities, and achieve
better career well-being. Similarly, Puebla (2022) argued that poor career choices among adolescents often result
from a lack of proper guidance from social environments, highlighting the importance of structured counselling
in shaping youth career decisions.
In summary, the descriptive results show that most students demonstrated moderate levels of interest across the
RIASEC dimensions, with particularly stronger inclinations toward Investigative and Social categories. These
patterns suggest that while students are exploring a range of occupational characteristics, their interests are not
yet strongly established. Therefore, strengthening career guidance, counselling, and skills-based exposure is
essential to help students develop clearer career preferences and better align with future workforce demands.
Career Outcome Expectations
Table 3 shows career outcome expectations level. From the overall sample, 65 students (14.1%) are at the low
level, 278 students (60.2%) are at the moderate level and 119 students (25.8%) are at the high level. The
noteworthy proportion at the moderate level indicates that this group of students has balanced expectations about
their career-related actions. This finding implies that majority of the students neither overly optimistic nor
pessimistic about future career.
Table 3 Career Outcome Expectations Level
Level
Frequency
Percentage
Low
65
14.1
Moderate
278
60.2
High
119
25.8
Total
462
100.0
Adolescence is a phase when students are determining and exploring their identity. According to Branje et al.
(2021), before adopting a possible identity, adolescents consider their childhood identifications, such as hobbies,
interests and values as these former identifications shape their career choices. During this process of exploration,
the expectation of a future career is
based on their current self-understanding and reality of the abilities they have. Thus, it is possible that a higher
percentage of students demonstrate a moderate level of career outcome expectations.
Batool and Ghayas (2020) stressed that during adolescence, gaining identity achievement is crucial as career
identity is one of the most important aspects of adolescence during this timeframe. They added that a well-
developed career identity not only strengthens career outcome expectations but also provides economic benefits
and personal fulfillment.
In conclusion, most students demonstrated moderate levels of career outcome expectations, reflecting a balanced
outlook toward their future careers. This suggests that while they are in the process of exploring and shaping
their identities, their expectations are grounded in self-understanding and developing abilities. Strengthening
Page 10000
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
career identity formation during adolescence is therefore vital to enhance realistic and positive career
expectations that can support long-term personal and professional growth.
Regression Analysis to Determine Predictors of Career Readiness
Table 4 presents the multiple regression results for predictors of career readiness. This analysis also serves as the
hypothesis testing by identifying which factors significantly influence students’ preparedness for future career
pathways. Regression assumptions were met, with residuals showing approximate normality and no evidence of
severe multicollinearity (all VIF values < 5) (Hair et al., 2021; Mishra et al., 2019).
Table 4 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for Predictors of Career Readiness
Predictor
B
SE
β
t
p
Tolerance
VIF
1
R
.047
.048
.042
.979
.328
.825
1.212
2
I
.132
.048
.126
2.752
.006*
.731
1.368
3
A
.092
.054
.076
1.688
.092
.754
1.325
4
S
.004
.062
.003
.059
.953
.663
1.509
5
E
-.050
.061
-.041
-.826
.409
.618
1.619
6
C
.125
.054
.109
2.323
.021*
.698
1.432
7
COE
.714
.065
.446
10.943
<.001*
.930
1.076
Note. R = .547, R
2
= .299, F = (7, 454) = 27.666. Significance level, * p<.05. R= Realistic, I =
Investigative, A =Artistic, S = Social, E = Enterprising, C = Conventional, COE = Career Outcome
Expectations
The regression model was significant, R = .547, = .299, adjusted = .289, F (7, 454) = 27.67, p < .05,
indicating that career outcome expectations and career interests together explained 29.9% of the variance in
career readiness. The effect size was large, = 0.43 (Cohen, 1988). Among the predictors, career outcome
expectations emerged as the strongest predictor = .446, p < .05), thus supporting H7. These findings are in
line with previous study by Caesarani et al. (2021), Pratiwi et al. (2020), Qotimah and Wardani (2022) and Wong
et al. (2023). This finding highlights the crucial role of outcome expectations, as Li et al. (2024) stated that an
individual’s career trajectory is shaped by beliefs about the consequences of their career actions. Supporting this,
Lent and Brown (1996) explained that the combination of outcome expectations and interests, together with self-
efficacy, galvanises individuals to pursue particular careers. Consistent with this, Lent et al. (1994) in Social
Cognitive Career Theory asserted that when individuals believe in what they can achieve and expect from their
career choice, outcome expectations drive actions through interest. This process influences readiness toward
career choice, as those who expect positive outcomes (e.g. career satisfaction, achievement), will be motivated
to participate in activities that enhance career readiness (Pratiwi et al., 2020).
Furthermore, both Investigative (β = .126, p < .05) and Conventional = .109, p < .05) significantly predicted
career readiness, thereby supporting H2 and H6. In contrast, the remaining four dimensions, Realistic, Artistic,
Social and Enterprising were not significant predictors, and thus H1, H3, H4, and H5 were not supported. These
results contradict Ajayi et al. (2023), who found that Enterprising, Social and Artistic interests positively
influenced career decision-making among South African students. They also differ from Donnay and Borgen
(1996) and Hansen and Dik (2005), both of whom reported that all RIASEC dimensions significantly predicted
career choice. A possible explanation for these inconsistencies lies in contextual and developmental factors. In
the Malaysian secondary school context, Realistic and Enterprising pathways may require practical exposure or
entrepreneurial readiness that students have yet to acquire, while Artistic and Social interests may be less
emphasised in the education system, reducing their salience for readiness. This contradiction highlights that
while prior studies established the predictive value of all RIASEC dimensions for career choice, only certain
dimensions, particularly Investigative and Conventional, appear to translate into overall career readiness within
the present context. The significant contribution of Investigative and Conventional interests suggests that
Page 10001
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
students with these traits are more likely to participate in activities related to their preferred fields, thereby
strengthening their career readiness. As Jones et al. (2021) noted, individuals with specific career interests
prioritise relevant activities, environments and outcomes by allocating more time and effort toward achieving
their goals. Similarly, Pham et al. (2024) emphasised that such individuals gather career-related information,
understand their traits, plan and evaluate strategies and actively prepare for future opportunities, processes that
directly contribute to heightened career readiness.
In conclusion, the regression analysis demonstrates that career outcome expectations are the strongest predictor
of career readiness, while Investigative and Conventional career interests also play significant roles. These
results underline the importance of fostering positive outcome expectations and supporting students in
developing specific career interests to strengthen their preparedness for future educational and occupational
pathways.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE STUDIES
This study demonstrated that Form Four students in Johor largely exhibit a moderate level of career readiness,
with career outcome expectations emerging as the strongest predictor, followed by Investigative and
Conventional career interests. These results underscore the importance of nurturing positive career aspirations
and aligning students’ interests with realistic opportunities in Malaysia’s evolving educational and labour
landscape.
At the same time, the non-significant effects of Realistic, Artistic, Social and Enterprising interests point to
limited exposure and cultural preferences for secure professions, highlighting the need to broaden career
guidance beyond conventional pathways. Policies and interventions at the state and school levels should focus
on equipping students with adaptable skills, expanding awareness of diverse career options and integrating
targeted guidance programmes.
Several limitations should be noted. The use of convenience sampling restricts generalisability, reliance on self-
reported data may introduce bias and the cross-sectional design prevents causal conclusions. These findings,
while meaningful, are specific to Johors socioeconomic context and may not fully represent other regions.
Future research should therefore employ longitudinal and mixed-methods designs, extend to diverse geographic
and socioeconomic settings and incorporate additional psychosocial and environmental predictors such as career
self-efficacy, parental support, teacher expectations and socioeconomic background. In particular, this study did
not distinguish between STEM-stream and non-STEM students. Given Malaysia’s national emphasis on building
a strong STEM pipeline, further studies should specifically investigate career readiness among STEM-stream
students, who may face distinct challenges in aligning their interests and outcome expectations with science and
technology-based career pathways. Such efforts will provide a more comprehensive understanding of adolescent
career readiness and strengthen evidence-based strategies for preparing Malaysian youth for an increasingly
technology-driven labour market.
REFERENCE
1. Abd. Karim, N. I., & Mohd Rasdi, R. (2021). The Interplay between Career Decision Making Efficacy,
Career Exposure and Career Choice of Undergraduates: Does Gender Matters? International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(19), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-
i19/11722
2. Abu Rahim, M. A. R., Abdul Wahab, D., & Jani, R. (2023). School-To-Work Transition and Job Mismatch
Among the Young Workers in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Economy (IJBEC), 5(1), 84
101. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
3. Agherdien, N. (2014). Investigating student readiness for tertiary education. December, 247.
4. Ajayi, O. B., Moosa, M., & Aloka, P. J. O. (2023). Relationship Between Career Interest and Career
Decision-Making of Grade 12 Learners in Township Secondary Schools in South Africa. Athens Journal of
Education, 10(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-2-7
5. Alfaiz, A., Hidayat, H., Yandri, H., Sari, A. T. L., Sendayu, F. S., Suarja, S., & Arjoni, A. (2021).
Page 10002
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Identification of perceived self-efficacy to predict student’s awareness in career readiness. Islamic Guidance
and Counseling Journal, 4(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v4i1.933
6. Alias, R., Ee, G. T., Sombuling, A., & Jayos, S. (2022). Work Readiness among Final Year Students in A
Higher Education in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i3/15504
7. Amar, S. N., Kamaludin, M., Abd. Aziz, A., Zainuddin, M. R. K. V., & Sulaiman, K. I. (2023). Industrial
Sectors’ Perception Towards Renewable Energy Sources in Johor, Malaysia. Journal of Business and Social
Development, 11(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.46754/jbsd.2023.09.006
8. Armstrong, P. I., Allison, W., & Rounds, J. (2008). Development and initial validation of brief public
domain RIASEC marker scales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 287–299.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.06.003
9. Ashari, Z. H. M., Azman, N., & Rasul, M. S. (2019). Factors predicting career choice among Malaysian
students in skills-based training institutions. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance,
19(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9366-5
10. Aslina Mohamed. (2022). Pengalaman Pembelajaran, Perancangan Dan Eksplorasi Kerjaya, Efikasi
Kendiri, Ekspektasi Hasil Dan Matlamat Dengan Kepastian Kerjaya Pelajar Kolej Vokasional. Universiti
Putra Malaysia.
11. Azhenov, A., Kudysheva, A., Fominykh, N., & Tulekova, G. (2023). Career decision-making readiness
among students’ in the system of higher education: career course intervention. Frontiers in Education,
8(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1097993
12. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2019). College, Career and Life Readiness: A Look at High School Indicators of
Post-Secondary Outcomes in Boston. Boston Foundation.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED596471%0Ahttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596471.pdf
13. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review,
84(2), 191–215. https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/news/pdfs/Bandura 1977.pdf
14. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
15. Batool, S. S., & Ghayas, S. (2020). Process of career identity formation among adolescents: components
and factors. Heliyon, 6(9), e04905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04905
16. Betz, N. E., & Voyten, K. K. (1997). Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Influence Career Exploration and
Decidedness. Career Development Quarterly, 46(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-
0045.1997.tb01004.x
17. Branje, S., de Moor, E. L., Spitzer, J., & Becht, A. I. (2021). Dynamics of Identity Development in
Adolescence: A Decade in Review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 908–927.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12678
18. Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., Foo, D. H. P., & Hon, Y. K. (2024). Sample size determination for conducting
a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 49(1), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3
19. Caesarani, F. P., Astria, F., Syakurah, R. A., Aulia, B., & Siburian, R. (2021). Modeling of Career Choice
Behaviors in Indonesian Dentistry Students. B-Dent: Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Baiturrahmah,
7(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.33854/jbd.v7i2.518
20. Chang, E. S., Shane, J., Masdonati, J., & Villarreal, B. J. (2023). Editorial: Social relationships and career
development throughout the lifespan: identifying patterns of shared and non-shared agency. Frontiers in
Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235829
21. Chen, H., Liu, F., Wen, Y., Ling, L., Chen, S., Ling, H., & Gu, X. (2021). Career Exploration of High School
Students: Status Quo, Challenges, and Coping Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(September), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672303
22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
24. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Laporan Survei Tenaga Buruh Malaysia 2023.
https://storage.dosm.gov.my/labour/lfs_annual_2023.pdf
25. Dodd, V., Hanson, J., & Hooley, T. (2022). Increasing students’ career readiness through career guidance:
measuring the impact with a validated measure. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(2), 260
272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1937515
Page 10003
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
26. Donnay, D. A. C., & Borgen, F. H. (1996). Validity, Structure, and Content of the 1994 Strong Interest
Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.275
27. Du, Y. Y. L., Wee, S., & Rounds, J. (2024). Gender Differences in Vocational Interests Across 57 Countries:
A Test of the Interest–Gender-Equality Paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 16(1), 27
44. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241280321
28. Elias, S., Hj. Mohd Din, D. R. @ R., Ali, M. S., Hussain, M. A. M., Ali, M. S., & Hussain, M. A. M. (2024).
Career Guidance For Students: Awareness Towards Course Selection and Career Planning among
Secondary Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and
Development, 13(3), 1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i3/17487
29. Etikan, I., Sulaiman Abubakar, M., & Rukayya, S. A. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and
Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
30. European Training Foundation. (2022). A Review of National Career Development. 1–67.
31. Fajaryati, N., Budiyono, B., Akhyar, M., & Wiranto, W. (2020). The employability skills needed to face the
demands of work in the future: Systematic literature reviews. Open Engineering, 10(1), 595–603.
https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0072
32. Gleeson, J., & Walsh, L. (2023). Managing career uncertainty and anxiety: the power of career
conversations. https://www.esa.edu.au/resources/news-articles/article-detail/managing-career-uncertainty-
and-anxiety-the-power-of-career-conversations
33. Gustina, A., Liu, J. S., Indartono, S., Endarwati, M. L., & Darmawati, A. (2024). Connecting the dots: How
parent support shapes career readiness through psychological capital. SA Journal of Human Resource
Management, 22, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2540
34. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares
Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
35. Hamzah, S. R., Musa, S. N. S., & Mohamad, N. (2022). The mediating effect of self-efficacy on career
aspiration and organizational support with subjective career success among Malaysian women managers
during the Covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Sociology, 7.
36. Hansen, J. I. C., & Dik, B. J. (2005). Evidence of 12-year predictive and concurrent validity for SII
Occupational Scale scores. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 365–378.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.001
37. Holland, J. L., & et al. (1973). Applying an occupational classification to a representative sample of work
histories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035405
38. Idris, R., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring STEM Education Trends in Malaysia: Building a Talent Pool
for Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive
Education and Development, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/16825
39. Jones, K. S., Newman, D. A., Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2021). Black-White differences in vocational interests:
Meta-analysis and boundary conditions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(4), 589–607.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09693-5
40. Korkmaz, O., & Yam, F. C. (2023). What Role Do Visions About Future and Vocational Outcome
Expectations Have on Proactive Career Behaviors? Examining a Mediation Model on University Students.
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(2), 86–106.
https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.548.5
41. Kurniawati, H., Widiasari, E., Zalafi, Z., Putri, S. A., Hidayah, K., & A’yun, N. Q. (2023). Career
Intervention to Enhance Students’ Career Maturity. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and
Analysis, 06(04), 1812–1820. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i4-55
42. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (1996). Social Cognitive Approach to Career Development: An Overview.
Career Development Quarterly, 44(4), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1996.tb00448.x
43. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career
research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 12–35.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281364
44. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career
and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
45. Lent, R. W., Ireland, G. W., Penn, L. T., Morris, T. R., & Sappington, R. (2017). Sources of self-efficacy
Page 10004
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: A test of the social cognitive model
of career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 107–117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.01.002
46. Li, J., Liu, X., & Mullins, P. (2024). Exploring the Career Development Challenges and Expectations of
International Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of International Students, 14(4), 591–605.
https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v14i4.6511
47. Mahmud, M. I. (2017). Kesan Program Kerjaya Psiko-Pendidikan Cognitive Information Processing
Terhadap Ketidakfungsian Pemikiran Kerjaya dan Efikasi Kendiri Kerjaya Pelajar di Sebuah Universiti
Awam. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
48. Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and
normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72.
https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
49. Mohd Puad, M. H., Mohamed, A., & Rashid, A. M. (2023). Career-Related Characteristics Towards Career
Certainty of Vocational College Students. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(3 Special Issue),
92–104. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2023.15.03.009
50. Mohd Raime, R. (2020). Faktor Penentu Matlamat Kerjaya Sebagai Akauntan Bertauliah Dalam Kalangan
Pelajar Perakaunan Di Malaysia [Universiti Utara Malaysia]. https://etd.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/8361
51. Moore, M., & Thaller, J. (2023). Career readiness : preparing social work students for entry into the
workforce. Frontiers in Education, 8:1280581(November), 16.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1280581
52. Musa, F., & Mat Rashid, A. (2020). Career Readiness Among Vocational Graduates: Implication of
Competency Based Learning. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 6(66), 633–638.
https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.66.633.638
53. Nor Hazwani Halim, & Sahid, S. (2020). Kemahiran Kesediaan Kerja, Efikasi Kendiri, Tingkah Laku
Keusahawanan dan Eksplorasi Kerjaya dalam kalangan Graduan. Akademika, 90(Isu Khas 3), 155–165.
https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-90IK3-12
54. OECD. (2024). Teenage career uncertainty : why it matters and how to reduce it. 16, 1–14.
55. Pham, M., Lam, B. Q., & Tuan Ngoc Bui, A. (2024). Career exploration and its influence on the relationship
between self-efficacy and career choice: The moderating role of social support. Heliyon, 10(11), e31808.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31808
56. Pratiwi, F., Syakurah, R. A., Yuliana, I., & Siburian, R. (2020). Relationships of Self-Efficacy, Outcome
Expectation, Career Intention and Career Exploration in Nutrition Science Student’s Career Choice.
25(Sicph 2019), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.200612.042
57. Puebla, J. N. (2022). Career Decisions and Dilemmas of Senior High School Students in Disadvantaged
Schools: Towards the Development of A Proposed Career Guid-ance Program. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(5), 888–903.
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.05.15
58. Qotimah, R. K., & Wardani, M. K. (2022). Career Choice for Accounting Students Using the Social
Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) Approach. The 4th International Conference on Islamic Economics
Studies (ICIES) 2024, 118–130.
59. Rong, L. W., Zainudin, Z. N., Kamarudin, E. M. E., & Asri, A. S. (2024). Influence of Self-Efficacy on
Career Exploration Behaviors Among Malaysian Government School Young Adolescents. Journal of
Institutional Research South East Asia, 22(1), 328–350.
60. Shaari, R., Haron, M. Z., Samah, I. H. A., & Sarip, A. (2024). Exploring factors influencing upper secondary
school students’ intention towards TVET: insights from Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of
Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09926-1
61. Sheu, H. Bin, Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Miller, M. J., Hennessy, K. D., & Duffy, R. D. (2010). Testing the
choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal
of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.015
62. Shougee, F. (2024). Career Decision-making Process of Secondary School Students in Maldives:
Recommendations for Integrating Career Education into Secondary Schools Curriculum. The Malaysian
Journal of Social Administration, 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22452/18sp/1.25
63. Super, D. E. (1953). A theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8(5), 185–190.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056046
Page 10005
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
64. Taherdoost, H., Business, H., Sdn, S., Group, C., & Lumpur, K. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research
Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for. International Journal of Academic Research in
Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18–27.
65. Tang, M. (2019). Career Development and Counseling: Theory and Practice in a Multicultural World. Sage
Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071801321
66. Vieira, K. M., Potrich, A. C. G., Bressan, A. A., & Klein, L. L. (2021). Loss of financial well-being in the
COVID-19 pandemic: Does job stability make a difference? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental
Finance, 31, 100554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100554
67. Villares, E., & Brigman, G. (2019). College/Career Success Skills: Helping Students Experience
Postsecondary Success. Professional School Counseling, 22(1b), 2156759X1983444.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759x19834444
68. Wang, P., Zheng, Y., Zhang, M., Yin, K., Geng, F., Zheng, F., Ma, J., & Wu, X. (2024). Methods for
measuring career readiness of high school students: based on multidimensional item response theory and
text mining. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-
03436-0
69. Wong, S. T., Wong, S. C., & Lim, C. S. (2023). Predictive modeling of career choices among fresh
graduates: application of model selection approach. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2023-0328
70. World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of Jobs Report 2025. In World Economic Forum (Issue January).
71. Yeop Kamarudin, N., & Mohd Kosnin, A. (2022). Integrative Career Readiness Model Using Psychological
Construct. 1(43).
72. Yousef, W. (2024). Shaping Career Development Through College Readiness at the High School Level.
Education Sciences, 14(1190), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111190
73. Zhao, W. X., Peng, M. Y. P., & Liu, F. (2021). Cross-Cultural Differences in Adopting Social Cognitive
Career Theory at Student Employability in PLS-SEM: The Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Deep
Approach to Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(June), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586839