INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 1

www.rsisinternational.org

Facilitating English Language Learning Through Digital Storytelling;

A Systematic Literature Review

Rabiah Rustam

, Haixia Guo

Associate Professor. Department of Humanities COMSATS University, Islamabad, Abbottabad

Campus, Pakistan

Associate Professor, School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Tianjin University, Tianjin,

300350, People's Republic of China

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100001

Received: 06 November 2025; Accepted: 12 November 2025; Published: 27 November 2025

ABSTRACT

This systematic review analyzes the effectiveness of Digital Storytelling (DST) as a teaching tool for

learning English. It integrates and critiques prior research regarding the tool's effectiveness, theoretical

justification, and challenges in implementation. Indicative studies do point DST's potential to promote

certain critical language skills as a result of the motivation, autonomy, and critical thinking an individual

DST learner develops. It is true the motivation is a positive factor, yet autonomy is an achievement. It is

notable for many studies DST is based on the combination of constructivist and multimodal learning

theories. DST accomplishes the development of writing fluency, the speaking skill, and vocabulary

acquisition in language learning. Most importantly, the review outlines the major and critical shortcomings

in the existing studies. Most importantly the review outlines critical research gaps. The largest of these is

probably the absence of longitudinal studies to verify the retention of language skills over time. In addition,

most uses of DST lack attention to the specific linguistic subsystems, such as pragmatic competence or

complex syntax, that might be addressed through task design. The prospect of studying multimodal

constructs opens new avenues for research, given data's efficiency in enhancing learning. The lack of

longitudinal, empirical studies that capture learning over time is a critical missed opportunity. There is great

potential for multimodal DST methods to change student learning, but the main gap that defines the research

gap for DST is the lack of documentation for longitudinal learning.

Keywords: Digital storytelling, ELT, Methodology, learning, DST

INTRODUCTION

Digital storytelling is “the practice of using computer-based tools to tell stories” by combining narrative with

digital content such as pictures, sound and movies to create a short film . It is thus much more than a technological

gadget; Digital Storytelling is actually a twenty-first-century digital literacy formation merged with the ancient

art of oral narrative. An extensive and robust research has been already conducted in the sphere, including

empirical studies, and in the literature review of DST in the EFL/ESL classroom must prove a large extent of

positive impact on a variety of English language learning dimensions.

The theoretical grounding for the effectiveness of DST is solidly rooted in constructivist and socialconstructivist

learning theories. In the process of creating a digital story, the learner is not just a passive receiver of knowledge

but rather an active participant. Learners have to decide on a topic, write a narrative script, sequence visual

components, and often record their voices; therefore, the learning is very personalized and meaningful (Sadik,

2008). This follows the principles of student-centered learning and project-based learning, in which the student's

role comes first. Second, DST fosters multimodal literacy. Students learn to understand meaning not only through

the text but through a different ways such as linguistic, visual, auditory, and spatial methods being valued in in

today's digital world (Hafner & Miller, 2011; Ohler, 2013). Furthermore, it has also been documented that it has

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 2

www.rsisinternational.org

emotional benefits. The creative DST projects lead to enhanced learner engagement and build sense of ownership

which matters a lot to young learners struggling with confidence in conventional classrooms (Yoon, 2013).

Research has started to confirm those theoretical ideas. Research has found that DST can promote oral

proficiency in a low-anxiety speaking and pronunciation practice context, as students rehearse and re-record

their stories (Kim, 2014). In writing, the actual scripting and storyboarding of visual stories can assist in

organization, grammar and vocabulary usage (Normann, 2011). In research by Tsou, Wang, and Tzeng (2006), a

multimedia storytelling website was found to significantly improved reading comprehension and vocabulary

retention. Moreover, DST projects also generally require collaboration, developing the students' communicative

competence and pragmatic skills in authentic, task-based contexts (Smeda et al., 2014). Same is supported by

Razmi et al. (2024).

Although significant research is available, still, there are gaps and limitations in the current research which

indicate a need for deeper and more thorough investigation.

First, we lack a clear understanding of the long-term effects and retention of language skills gained through DST.

Most existing studies, including the year-long work of Yang and Wu (2021) have been conducted over just one

semester or academic year. While they demonstrate significant immediate gains after testing, we do not know if

the vocabulary, grammar, or storytelling skills learned through a DST project are retained by learners over a

longer time or whether the engaging, project-based approach of DST foster more lasting learning compared to

traditional methods. Research has not yet consistently tracked learners' progress over several years to see if the

initial motivational and cognitive benefits lead to ongoing language growth.

Second, the current research does not provide a clear way to integrate Digital Storytelling (DST) to focus on

specific subsystems of language. While studies generally show that DST improves writing skills or speaking

fluency, they often do not explain how to transform the design of the DST project to some areas such as studying

pragmatic competence, complex sentence structures, or cohesive devices. The reasons for its success are

sometimes unclear. For instance, finding out if a DST project is better for teaching narrative tenses than the past

perfect or if it can be specifically used to practice certain speech acts, like apologies or requests is not yet clear.

The work of scholars including Barrett (2006) and Robin (2016) offer general guidelines, but there is still a gap

in creating and validating a differentiated instructional model that clearly connects specific DST tasks, such as

the type of story, the required narrative structure, and the focus of peer feedback, with learning specific language

features.

Third, there is an important gap regarding the role of the teacher and the assessment challenges in DSTdriven

language classrooms.Much of the research focuses on the student as the creator, but the teacher's role as a

facilitator, technology guide, and language coach in this complex process is not well-developed and lacks

research. The studies by Gakhar and Thompson (2007) and Thang et al. (2014) address teacher and student

perceptions, but they do not closely examine the teaching strategies, classroom management methods, or

professional development needs of teachers using DST. This connects to the issue of assessment. Traditional

standardized tests mostly fail to capture the diverse learning outcomes of a DST project.These outcomes include

not just linguistic accuracy, but also creativity, digital literacy, collaboration, and narrative coherence. The field

lacks clear, validated, and practical rubrics that teachers can reliably use to give formative and summative

feedback on both the language and the multimodal product, without getting overwhelmed by the task's

complexity.

To address these gaps, this research aims to conduct a thorough study. It goes beyond just showing that DST

works. It will explore the specific conditions that help it best support long-term, specific, and measurable English

language learning.

Research Objectives

1. To find out the long-term effects and retention of language skills gained through DST

2. To propose differentiated instructional model for digital storytelling that also focuses on pragmatic

competence and complex sentence structures

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 3

www.rsisinternational.org

3. To identify the teachers roles during digital storytelling projects and suggest a practical rubric for

assessment

Research Questions

1. How DST affects retention of language skills?

2. Which instructional model can be suitable for DST that also focuses on pragmatic competence and

complex sentence structures?

3. What can be the teachers roles during digital storytelling projects and suggest a practical rubric for

assessment?

LITERATURE REVIEW

The role of technology in language education has changed from a minor addition to a main element,

fundamentally altering how language input is presented, practiced, and produced. Among the many technological

options, Digital Storytelling (DST) has gained notable attention as an effective method that aligns with the

communicative, student-centered, and multimodal goals of modern language teaching. Bernajean Porter (as cited

in Robin, 2016) defines DST as the modern way of expressing the ancient art of storytelling through various

digital media, including text, images, audio, video, and music. DST allows learners to be active creators of

meaning rather than just passive recipients. This literature review brings together existing research on using

digital storytelling to facilitate English language learning. It starts by outlining the theoretical foundations of

DST and moves on to analyze its impact on specific language skills and competencies. The review also looks at

motivation and autonomy, discusses the practical challenges of implementation, and concludes by identifying

key gaps in current research, making a case for further study.

Theoretical Foundations of Digital Storytelling in Language Learning

The effectiveness of DST arises not just from its technological appeal but is also grounded in established learning

and language acquisition theories.

Constructivist and Social Constructivist Paradigms

At its essence, DST is a constructivist activity. Learners build their own knowledge and understanding of

language by actively creating a digital narrative (Sadik, 2008). This process involves selecting a topic, writing a

script, storyboarding, collecting multimedia resources, and assembling the final product. Each step involves

critical decision-making, problem-solving, and applying language skills in a real context. This approach aligns

with Piaget's idea that knowledge is constructed through experience and interaction. Moreover, DST includes a

social constructivist aspect, as proposed by Vygotsky. Many DST projects are collaborative, featuring peer

feedback, group planning, and shared authorship. In these collaborations, learning is supported through

interaction with more knowledgeable peers and teachers, enabling learners to work within their Zone of Proximal

Development (ZPD) to achieve tasks they could not complete on their own (Hafner & Miller, 2011). The

classroom becomes a community where language serves as a tool for collective creation.

Multimodality and New Literacies

DST is inherently multimodal. It requires learners to be skilled not just in language but also in visual, auditory,

gestural, and spatial communication (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001). This multimodal approach is central to New

Literacies, which argue that literacy in the 21st century goes beyond reading and writing print text. It now

includes the ability to critically understand and create digital, multimedia texts (Cope & Kalantzis, 2009). For

English language learners (ELLs), this is particularly impactful. They can use images and sound to support and

clarify their linguistic messages. This reduces the cognitive load of producing a solely text-based narrative and

allows them to express complex ideas that may exceed their current vocabulary or syntax (Ohler, 2013). As a

result, DST teaches English along with digital and multimodal literacies, preparing students for the

communication demands of today’s world.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 4

www.rsisinternational.org

Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and Project-Based Learning (PJBL)

DST is an ideal vehicle for both Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and Project-Based Learning (PJBL). A

DST project is a complex, holistic task resulting in a digital story. This fits well with TBLT's emphasis on

meaning over form and its use of tasks modeled on real-world language use (Ellis, 2003). During the project,

learners use language practically to negotiate meaning, cooperate, and solve problems. Similarly, as a

projectbased learning initiative, DST is typically sustained, inquiry-based, and driven by students, resulting in a

concrete product. This method promotes deeper learning and combines various skills including research, writing,

technology, and presentation into a unified experience (Brenner, 2014). The project-based nature of DST ensures

that language learning is contextual, purposeful, and personally relevant.

The Impact of DST on Specific Language Skills and Competencies

Research has provided strong evidence for the positive effects of DST on different areas of English language

proficiency.

Writing Skills

Creating a digital story starts with writing. Developing a script requires learners to engage deeply with narrative

structure, coherence, cohesion, and vocabulary choice. Studies consistently show that this process significantly

improves writing proficiency. Sadik (2008) found that DST gave secondary school students a meaningful context

for writing, resulting in more engaged and detailed narratives. Knowing their text would be part of a public

multimedia presentation motivated students to invest more effort in drafting and revising. Similarly, Normann

(2011) reported that Norwegian university students saw the writing process in DST as highly beneficial for their

academic English skills, particularly in organizing ideas and using linking words. The iterative writing process

for DST includingdrafting, receiving feedback on clarity and flow from peers who visualize the story, and

revising denotes a process-writing approach commonly endorsed in second language writing instruction.

Oral Proficiency and Speaking Fluency

DST creates a unique, low-pressure environment for developing oral skills. Unlike impromptu speaking tasks,

DST allows learners to script, practice, and re-record their narration multiple times until they are satisfied with

their delivery. This reduces the anxiety associated with spontaneous speech and helps them focus on

pronunciation, intonation, and fluency. Kim's (2014) research highlights this point. In her study, learners used

DST to practice speaking skills independently. The findings showed significant improvements in oral

proficiency, with students reporting greater confidence in their speaking abilities. Listening to their own

recordings provided them with metalinguistic awareness, enabling them to self-correct and improve.

Furthermore, Castañeda (2013) found that students felt proud of their vocal performances, viewing the narration

as a part of themselves, which increased their personal investment in achieving clear and expressive speech.

Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Comprehension

The multimodal aspect of DST makes it a powerful tool for vocabulary learning. When students create a story,

they often search for precise words to express their ideas. Pairing these new words with images and audio in

their final product creates a strong mental representation that aids in retention. Tsou, Wang, and Tzeng (2006)

demonstrated this in their study of a multimedia storytelling website. Students in the experimental group who

used the platform showed much better vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension than those in the

control group. The researchers argued that presenting textual, auditory, and visual information simultaneously

provided multiple ways to encode meaning, facilitating deeper cognitive processing. This aligns with Dual

Coding Theory (Paivio, 1986), which suggests information stored both verbally and visually is easier to recall.

Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy

Beyond individual language skills, DST promotes higher-order thinking and digital skills. Creating a digital story

involves analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Students must analyze their topic, gather information from various

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 5

www.rsisinternational.org

sources, and assess the relevance and quality of multimedia elements they want to use. Robin (2016) connects

DST to the development of essential 21st-century skills, including critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration.

In language learning, this means students are not just using English; they are also using it to think critically about

content and form. Moreover, the technical process of creating the video using editing software, managing digital

files, and understanding copyright builds vital digital literacies (Smeda et al., 2014). As Hafner and Miller (2011)

illustrated in their study of a collaborative video project, students become skilled at using technology not only

for consuming content but also for academic and creative production, marking a key shift in becoming

independent learners in the digital age.

Fostering Motivation, Autonomy, and Identity

A common theme throughout the literature is the significant impact of DST on the emotional factors that are

important for successful language acquisition.

Enhancing Motivation and Engagement

The personal, creative, and technology-driven nature of DST strongly motivates learners. Yoon (2013) argued

that DST gives English language learners intrinsic motivation by making learning personally relevant and

enjoyable. When students can tell their own stories about their lives, cultures, or views they develop a strong

sense of ownership over their work and the learning process. This marks a significant shift from unrelated

textbook exercises. Niemi and Multisilta (2016) found that student engagement was notably high in DST

projects, as participants saw the work as personally meaningful and empowering. The end result, a polished

digital video, also provides a sense of accomplishment that boosts motivation and can be shared with a wider

audience, further enhancing its value.

Developing Learner Autonomy

DST projects naturally encourage learner autonomy. By design, they shift the teacher's role from a source of

knowledge to a facilitator and guide. Throughout the project, students must take responsibility for many

decisions, from choosing a topic to carrying out technical tasks. Kim's (2014) study on independent learning for

oral skills is a prime example, showing how DST can create a structure that allows learners to direct their own

practice and improvement. The project-based format requires time management, goal setting, and problem-

solving—all vital aspects of independent learning. As students successfully navigate these challenges, their

confidence and ability to manage their own learning outside the classroom grow.

Affirming Cultural and Personal Identity

For many language learners, the classroom can feel like a place where their identity is overlooked. DST can

balance this by providing a platform for students to share their cultural background and personal stories.

Castañeda's (2013) research powerfully illustrates this, featuring a student who expressed, "I am proud that I did

it and it’s a piece of me." By creating stories that reflect their identities, learners can connect their personal

experiences with the target language, making English a medium for self-expression rather than just a subject to

study. This confirms their identity and helps lower the emotional barriers to language learning, creating a more

favorable environment for acquisition.

Getting DST into language classes isn't always easy. We need to be real about some of the issues that pop up.

One big problem is just getting access to the tech needed. To do DST well, you need computers, mics, cameras,

and video editing software. Sometimes you also need fast internet. But not every school or student has these

things (Smeda et al., 2014). Also, teachers and students might not be tech experts, which can be annoying and

means they focus more on the tech than actually learning the language. So, schools might need to spend money

on tech and give teachers and students time to learn how to use it. To make DST work, teachers have to change

how they teach. They can't just be the boss telling everyone what to do. They need to help students, learn with

them, and manage projects. That can be tricky because it means learning new skills like using tech, managing

projects, and helping people work together (Gakhar & Thompson, 2007). Thang et al. (2014) showed that

teachers like DST but worry about the time it takes, managing the classroom, and not knowing enough about

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 6

www.rsisinternational.org

tech. If they don't get good help and training, it can mess up DST projects. Usually, language tests check small

things like vocab and grammar. But DST is big and includes a lot. How can a teacher fairly grade something that

involves language, how it looks, the story, and the tech stuff? We don't have easy, standard grading guides that

cover everything. Barrett (2006) and others have ideas for grading, but no one totally agrees. So, teachers often

make up their own rules, which can be confusing and might not match what they're supposed to be teaching. The

language part can get lost if the video looks super polished but the grading rules aren't clear. After reading a

bunch of stuff, it's clear that Digital Storytelling is a useful tool for learning English. It helps with thinking,

feeling, and understanding different cultures. It's based on some good ideas and lots of studies show it's helpful

for writing, speaking, vocab, and thinking critically. Plus, it can get students excited and help them feel good

about themselves.

However, a detailed review shows several key gaps that need further inquiry:

1. Long-Term Efficacy and Retention: Most studies, including the important work of Yang and Wu (2021),

measure results right after the intervention. There is a clear lack of long-term research that examines

whether the language gains and motivation benefits of digital storytelling (DST) last over time. The

question of whether DST leads to more lasting language learning compared to other methods remains

mostly unanswered.

2. Differentiated Integration for Specific Language Features: While research shows general improvements

in skills like writing or speaking, it lacks detail. Studies need to go beyond a generic approach and explore

how the design of DST tasks can be specifically adjusted to target and assess the learning of particular

language features, such as pragmatic skills, specific syntactic structures, or academic vocabulary.

connection between task design and specific language learning goals is not well explored.

3. Teacher Preparedness and Comprehensive Assessment: Issues related to the role of teachers and

assessment are recognized but not well-studied from an empirical perspective. Future research should

not only identify these challenges but also work on creating and testing specific professional development

models to assist teachers. At the same time, there is an urgent need to develop, test, and share practical

assessment rubrics that effectively balance evaluating language accuracy with narrative flow, creativity,

and technical skills, ensuring that teaching remains focused on language learning.

In essence, while digital storytelling offers a promising and sound educational approach, future research must

tackle these gaps. By concentrating on long-term effects, targeted integration, and teacher support, the field can

advance beyond proving that DST is effective to understanding how, why, and under what conditions it works

best, making it more effective and sustainable in various English language learning settings.

Methodology for the Systematic Literature Review

The methodology behind this systematic literature review on "Facilitating English Language Learning Through

Digital Storytelling" was crafted through a thorough, multi-step process aimed at ensuring we covered everything

comprehensively, stayed relevant, and maintained scholarly integrity. A structured protocol was followed that

included planning, executing searches, screening, and synthesizing the findings. The first step was defining the

scope and main goal to bring together existing research on how digital storytelling (DST) impacts English

language acquisition, highlight key theoretical foundations, and identify any gaps in the literature. An extensive

search was conducted for literature across major academic databases like Google Scholar, ERIC, Scopus, and

others. To keep our search focused yet broad, we used a structured search string: "digital storytelling" OR "digital

narrative" related with ("English language learning" , "EFL", "ESL" and "second language acquisition". Search

was limited to peer-reviewed journal articles, systematic reviews, and dissertations published in English from

2004 to 2024, capturing the time since DST became a notable teaching tool.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will build on the findings discussed above to show how DST includes many aspects of

teaching and learning in the context of English language learning. After introducing a theoretical framework

through a literature review of the workings of DST, the findings will be discussed in light of the two research

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 7

www.rsisinternational.org

questions, and the current evidence in the field will be discussed in relation to the theoretical framework and

methodological limitations. The aim is not to replicate existing findings, but to discuss what they indicate about

the potential of this approach and the barriers that still remain, and how the field should strive to realize the full

potential of DST.

The first exploration question is to what extent do learners who acquire vocabulary and narrative grammatical

structures through a digital design demonstrate significantly advanced retention rates compared to learners who

acquired the same material through traditional instruction? While the present review can not give definitive

longitudinal data, the synthesized substantiation allows for a robust, albeit conservative, thesis. The theoretical

and empirical case for long- term retention through DST is compelling. The principles of Binary Coding Theory(

Paivio, 1986), as used in studies like that of Tsou, Wang, and Tzeng (2006), suggest that the multimodal garbling

essential in DST where vocabulary and structures are linked to visual, audible, and narrative schemata creates

further robust and connected memory traces. When a learner hears their own voice using the once perfect tense

to describe a vital moment in their story, while contemporaneously viewing a corresponding image, the verbal

form is bedded within a rich, tone- constructed environment. This is a unnaturally different cognitive process

than learning a decontextualized alphabet rule or word list from a text.

Likewise, the constructivist and existential nature of DST systems contributes to what's likely deeper processing.

As Sadik( 2008) and Castañeda( 2013) observed, the particular investment and emotional resonance of creating

a digital story foster a position of engagement that promotes deeper cognitive encoding. Knowledge that's

acquired through particular, meaningful experience is demonstrably more durable. The act of storyboarding,

scripting, and chronicling provides expansive, task-essential practice with target language forms, moving beyond

mechanical drills to authentic use.

still, this auspicious interpretation must be tempered by a critical acknowledgment of the field's most significant

methodological space the nearly universal lack of long- term follow- up studies. The vast maturity of exploration,

including the robust time-long study by Yang and Wu( 2021), measures issues with immediate or delayed post-

tests. We can confidently state that DST is effective for accession and short- term retention, but the literature is

nearly silent on its relative efficacity for long- term retention over ages of 12, 18, or 24 months. It's entirely

presumptive that the original motivational" novelty effect" of DST could wane, or that without repeated, spaced

practice, the forgetting wind for DST- acquired language parallels that of traditionally acquired language. thus,

while the theoretical underpinnings explosively suggest an advantage for DST in long- term retention, this

remains a promising but unproven thesis. unborn exploration must prioritize longitudinal designs to move

beyond measuring literacy to truly understanding durable literacy.

The second question was which instructional model can be suitable for DST that also focuses on pragmatic

competence and complex sentence structures?

The reviewed literature convincingly demonstrates that DST improves oral proficiency, and vocabulary, still,

DST is a holistic task, failing to probe its eventuality as a perfection tool for specific verbal objects. The findings

reveal that the specific pedagogical mechanisms within the DST process that spark these concerns are

underexplored.

The exploration affirms that DST improves speaking skills ( Kim, 2014), but it does can't distinguish whether

it's further effective for prosody, phonemic delicacy, or ignorance. also, while advancements in" writing" are

proved( Normann, 2011), it's unclear if DST naturally promotes the use of complex inferior clauses or simply

improves the delicacy of simple rulings. The gap in realistic development is particularly striking. DST, with its

essential need for character dialogue and real- world scripts, presents a perfect platform for rehearsing speech

acts like requests, justifications, or suggestions. Yet, no study in this review explicitly designed a DST design

with the primary ideal of tutoring and measuring earnings in realistic capability.

This suggests that the eventuality of DST is presently under- optimized. A model, as proposed in the exploration

objects, would bear a shift in educational design. rather of a general" tell a particular story" advisement, tasks

would be precisely drafted. To target complex syntax, a prompt might bear scholars to produce a story explaining

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025

Page 8

www.rsisinternational.org

a cause- and- effect relationship, explicitly encouraging the use of adverbial clauses of reason and result. To

target pragmatics, a script- grounded DST could bear characters to navigate a socially delicate situation, similar

as a complaint or a polite turn down, with assessment concentrated on the suitability of the language used rather

than just its grammaticality.

The success of such a model hinges on making verbal objects unequivocal to learners and structuring the

feedback and assessment circles around them. Peer feedback sessions, for illustration, could be guided by rosters

that ask pundits to identify cases of targeted speech acts or specific syntactic structures. By moving from a

general to a discerned operation of DST, preceptors can transfigure it from a astronomically effective tool into a

suite of targeted interventions able of addressing specific learner requirements.

The third exploration question addressed the practical realities of integrating DST. The discussion of DST's

benefits is deficient without a discussion of the demands it places on preceptors. The literature constantly shows

that the schoolteacher's part undergoes a profound metamorphosis, shifting from knowledge transmitter to

project developer, technology adviser , resource director, and cooperative literacy facilitator( Hafner & Miller,

2011; Smeda et al., 2014). The challenges linked by Thang et al.( 2014) and Gakhar & Thompson( 2007) time

constraints, classroom operation, and specialized proficiency are not minor obstacles but central factors that can

determine the success or failure of a DST design.

This review synthesizes these challenges into a core conflict the pressure between the open- concluded, creative,

and pupil- directed morality of DST and the structured, objective, and time- bound nature of utmost formal

educational surroundings. The preceptors navigating this issue must come complete at scaffolding not only

language but also technology and design operation. They must give just enough structure through

templates,mini-deadlines, and clear mileposts to help learners from getting overwhelmed, while allowing enough

freedom for genuine creativity and power. This requires a sophisticated pedagogical skill set that is not generally

a focus of standard language schoolteacher training.

This challenge is inextricably linked to the problem of assessment. The literature reveals a clear insufficiency in

ready- to- use, validated assessment tools that recognize the multimodal nature of the DST product.However, it

ignores the narrative power, visual conceit, If assessment focuses solely on grammatical delicacy in the script.

Again, if assessmentover-emphasizes specialized polish or creativity, the core language literacy objects may be

sidelined. The work of Barrett( 2006) provides a starting point, but the field lacks a agreement.

Grounded on the synthesized findings, an effective rubric must be multidimensional, balancing at least four

crucial criteria

1. Verbal delicacy and range assessment of specific,pre-taught grammatical structures, vocabulary, and

pronunciation.

2. Narrative cohesion and content evaluation of the story's clarity, structure, originality, and emotional

resonance.

3. Multimodal design judgment on the thoughtful selection and synchronization of images, sound, and

voice to support and enhance the narrative.

4. Specialized prosecution and basic capability in assembling the digital factors into a coherent total.

Crucially, for such a rubric to be practical, it must be constructed with rehearsing preceptors, as proposed in the

exploration objects. Their input is essential for icing the criteria are observable, measurable, and doable to

estimate within the constraints of a real classroom, therefore resolving the critical perpetration gap between

DST's implicit and its practiced reality.

This discussion affirms that Digital Storytelling is a pedagogically sound and effective approach to English

language literacy, supported by robust theoretical fabrics and a growing body of empirical substantiation. Its

power lies in its capability to integrate language practice with the development of critical 21st- century chops,

all while boosting learner provocation and affirming identity. still, the field stands at a crossroads. The original

phase of establishing DST's general validity is largely complete. The findings of this review argue compellingly

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS) 
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025 
Page 9 
www.rsisinternational.org 
 
 
for a new phase of exploration characterized by lesser methodological complication and pedagogical perfection. 
This means designing longitudinal studies to probe long- term retention, developing and testing discerned DST 
models to target specific language features, and engaging in participatory action exploration with preceptors to 
produce and validate practical assessment fabrics. By addressing these gaps, experimenters and interpreters can 
move beyond celebrating DST as a promising invention and begin to codify it as a meliorated, dependable, and 
deeply poignant chief of ultramodern language pedagogy.  
CONCLUSION   
This  methodical  review  has  synthesised  a  substantial  body  of  literature  to  affirm  that    DST  constitutes  a 
theoretically robust and empirically supported pedagogical intervention in English language literacy, effectively 
integrating  the  development  of  verbal,  narrative,  and  digital  learnedness.  predicated  in  constructivist  and 
multimodal  literacy  propositions,  DST  enhances  crucial  language  skills,  including  writing  ignorance,  oral 
proficiency, and vocabulary accession, while fostering critical affective factors similar as learner provocation, 
autonomy, and artistic identity. still, a critical assessment of the content reveals that there are significant gaps 
that must be addressed to establish DST's role as a practical tool. Crucially, the literature is characterised by a 
lack of longitudinal data, leaving the vital question of long- term language retention unanswered. likewise, the 
approach  to  DST  frequently  remains  incomplete  with  inadequate  exploration  into  how  its  design  can  be 
strategically applied to target separate verbal subsystems like pragmatics or complex syntax. By addressing these 
gaps, experiments and interpretations, it can transition from establishing DST's general efficacy to optimizing 
its practical applications, thereby making it deeply engaging, contextually rich, and eventually more profound 
language literacy experience.   
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  
This research is part of a project titled “Research on the Construction of Cross-Cultural Value Identity Based on 
a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind（H20240604)”  
REFERENCES 
  
1.  Barrett, H. (2006). Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a deep learning tool. In Proceedings 
of Society for Information Technology  & Teacher  Education International  Conference  (pp.  647–654). 
Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Computing  in  Education  (AACE). 
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22117/  
2.  Brenner, K. (2014). Digital storytelling: A powerful tool  for developing 21st century skills in the ESL 
classroom  [Master's  thesis,  Hamline  University].  DigitalCommons@Hamline. 
https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/10/  
3.  Castañeda, M. E. (2013).  “I am proud that I did  it and it’s a  piece  of  me”: Digital  storytelling  in the 
foreign  language  classroom.  CALICO  Journal,  *30*(1),  44–62. 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.30.1.44  
4.  Gakhar,  S.,  & Thompson, A.  (2007).  The  influence  of  digital  storytelling  experience  on  pre-service 
teacher education students' attitudes and intentions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 
*16*(4), 435–454.  
5.  Green,  M.  (2013).  Digital  storytelling  in  the  language  arts  classroom.  Learning  &  Leading  with 
Technology, *40*(5), 36–37.  
6.  Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative 
digital  video  project  in  a  technological  learning  environment.  Language  Learning  &  Technology, 
*15*(3), 68–86. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2011/hafnermiller.pdf  
7.  Kim,  S.  (2014).  Developing  autonomous  learning  for  oral  proficiency  using  digital  storytelling. 
Language Learning & Technology, *18*(2), 20–35. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2014/action1.pdf  
8.  Kocaman-Karoglu, A. (2015). The changing nature of storytelling in the digital age: Digital storytelling. 
Educational Media International, *52*(4), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1100391  

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS) 
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025 
Page 10 
www.rsisinternational.org 
 
 
9.  Niemi, H., & Multisilta, J. (2016). Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student 
engagement.  Technology,  Pedagogy  and  Education,  *25*(4),  451–468. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1074610  
10. Normann, A. (2011). Digital storytelling in second language  learning: A qualitative study on students’ 
reflections on potentials for learning. Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning, (1), 1–12.  
11. Ohler, J. B. (2013). Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways to literacy, learning, and 
creativity (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.  
12. Razmi,  M.,  Pourali,  S.,  &  Nozad,  S.  (2024).  Digital  storytelling  in  English  language  learning:  A 
systematic  review  and  meta-analysis.  Language  Learning  &  Technology,  *28*(1),  1–24. 
http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73561  
13. Reyes,  J.  P., Torres, K. M.,  & Mendez, G. (2022). Digital  storytelling: A tool  for  developing English 
language skills in primary school children. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, *31*(2), 
119–141.  
14. Robin, B. R. (2016). The power of digital storytelling to support teaching and learning. Digital Education 
Review, (30), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2016.30.17-29  
15. Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student 
learning.  Educational  Technology  Research  and  Development,  *56*(4),  487–  506. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8  
16. Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: 
A comprehensive study.  Smart  Learning Environments,  *1*(1),  1-21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-
014-0006-3  
17. Thang, S. M., Sim, L. Y., Mahmud, N., Lin, L. K., Zabidi, N. A., & Ismail, K. (2014). Enhancing 21st 
century learning skills via digital storytelling: Voices of Malaysian teachers and undergraduates. Procedia 
- Social and Behavioral Sciences, *118*, 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.067  
18. Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language 
learning. Computers & Education, *47*(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.013  
19. Yang, Y.-T. C., & Wu, W.-C. I. (2021). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, 
critical  thinking,  and  learning  motivation: A  year-long  experimental  study.  Computers  &  Education, 
*72*, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.022  
20. Yoon,  T.  (2013). Are  you  digitized?  Ways  to  provide  motivation  for  ELLs  using  digital  storytelling. 
International  Journal  of  Research  Studies  in  Educational  Technology,  *2*(1),  25–34. 
https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrset.2012.204  
 