INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
the reliability (consistency of assessment results) and validity (the degree to which assessment measures the
desired competencies) of CBC learning outcomes.
Moreover, researchers have pointed out conceptual issues with competency measurement (Oduor, 2021).
Because CBC focuses on multidimensional competencies, it is more challenging to standardize than objective
tests, which increases the subjectivity unless sound rubrics and assessor training is utilized. Proper
psychometrically valid instruments and clear guidelines, inter-rater calibration, and systematic moderation are
highlighted in literature as the factors that would enable CBC assessments to be credible and comparable across
students and schools (Oduor, 2021; UNESCO, 2019).
The implementation of CBC has been going through a review process in the Ministry of Education at the national
level through the issuance of terms of reference and monitoring exercises to deal with the issues that have arisen.
Policy analysts also claim that the rapid roll-out in Kenya boasts a special large-scale reform experiment yet it
escalates the necessity to examine the reliability and validity of assessment (Republic of Kenya, 2019). Reported
CBC results can be inaccurate because they may represent variations in teacher testing approaches as opposed
to actual competency learning.
In general, although CBC has revolutionized the concept of assessment system in Kenya, there are still critical
concerns regarding the quality of measurement of the assessment outcome. Not many studies have critically
assessed CBC measurement systems on the basis of psychometric indicators, which are reliability coefficients,
inter-rater consistency, construct validity, and equitability among groups of learners. Where research is
available, it is restricted to a localized setting or a particular assessment instrument (Kimosop, 2020; Oduor,
2021). Thus, a thorough analysis of the efficiency of the CBC assessment model of reliability and validity of the
learning outcomes in Kenya is not only timely but also required.
Justification for the Study
CBC philosophy of learner centrality rests on sound, reliable and valid assessment. The policy targets could not
be attainable and quantifiable with good faith unless there exist sound evaluation systems that translate into
enhanced life skills, employability and life-long learning. The research identifies existing psychometric strengths
and weaknesses of CBC tests, factors that undermine reliability and validity, and make recommendations such
as enhancing rubrics, training assessors and moderating the whole system. CBC assessment need to be
strengthened to ensure that learning outcomes that flow to the report provide the true picture of learners
capabilities (KNEC, 2020; UNESCO, 2019).
Statement of the Problem
Competency-based assessments are designed to yield valid and reliable measures of the ability of learners in
cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills and equitable comparison of their ability across schools and make
evidence-informed policy decisions (UNESCO, 2019). The assessments are likely to evaluate higher-order
learning abilities such as solving problems and creativity, and not a mere repetitive type of learning, and hence
the outcomes of education are likely to meet the 21st-century skill requirements.
This is not however the case in Kenya. Even though Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) has been rolled out
and Competency-Based Assessment (CBA) framework is available, studies conducted show that there are
concerns with reliability and validity of the learning outcomes. Only 38 percent of the teachers, according to a
survey conducted by the Ministry of Education in 2022, believed that they had been adequately prepared to
administer competency-based tests, and 62 percent of them indicated that they scored and implemented rubrics
unevenly. In the same vein, Uwezo (2021) also found that more than half of the teachers did not have the
resources to implement authentic performance tasks and therefore used traditional ones. Such inconsistencies
undermine the validity and comparability of the CBC results (Kimosop, 2020).
The misinformation compromises the credibility of CBC reforms, puts the system to unfair student assessment
at the risk, and demeans the policy measures due to weak evidence. Most literature has been devoted to the issue
of teacher preparedness and resources challenges (Oduor, 2021), but the issue of psychometric testing of the
Page 1006