INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1134
www.rsisinternational.org
Crimes in the Virtual World: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ani Munirah Mohamad*
School of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100090
Received: 17 November 2025; Accepted: 25 November 2025; Published: 01 December 2025
ABSTRACT
The rapid expansion of digital technologies has transformed crime into new dimensions within virtual
environments, making “crimes in the virtual world” a critical subject of scholarly investigation. Despite the
growing number of studies, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding of research patterns,
collaboration networks, and thematic developments in this field. To address this gap, this study employs a
bibliometric analysis to systematically examine existing literature and uncover knowledge structures. Data
were collected using the Scopus database through an advanced search strategy, yielding a total of 1,068
documents relevant to the theme. The dataset was cleaned and harmonised using OpenRefine, followed by
statistical and graphical analyses conducted through the Scopus Analyzer. Furthermore, VOSviewer
software was employed to generate visualisation maps, including keyword co-occurrence networks, co-
authorship collaborations, and thematic clusters. The findings reveal significant publication growth over
the past decade, with notable contributions from leading countries such as India, the United States, and the
United Kingdom. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted dominant research foci on cybercrime,
computer crime, cybersecurity, and digital forensics, while emerging topics such as artificial intelligence,
blockchain, and machine learning suggest evolving interdisciplinary approaches. Co-authorship analysis
demonstrated that research collaboration is concentrated among a few developed nations, although
participation from emerging economies is steadily increasing. These results provide empirical evidence of
the dynamic and interdisciplinary nature of virtual world crime research, emphasising both technological
and socio-legal perspectives. In conclusion, this study enriches the body of knowledge by offering a
structured overview of global research trends, identifying thematic strengths and gaps, and providing
valuable insights for future scholarly directions, policymaking, and international collaboration in
combating crimes in the virtual world.
Keywords:
crimes, cybercrimes, online, virtual
INTRODUCTION
The advent of virtual worlds has revolutionised the way individuals interact, offering unprecedented
opportunities for socialisation, entertainment, and commerce. However, alongside these benefits, virtual worlds
have also become a breeding ground for various forms of criminal activities. Crimes in the virtual world, ranging
from virtual theft and fraud to more severe offenses like virtual rape and murder, pose significant challenges to
law enforcement and legal systems worldwide. This paper aims to explore the nature of crimes in virtual worlds,
the motivations behind these crimes, and the implications for law enforcement and policy-making.
Virtual worlds, such as Second Life and the metaverse, have become integral parts of many people's lives,
providing platforms for social interaction, business, and entertainment. However, these virtual environments are
not immune to criminal activities. Crimes in virtual worlds can mirror those in the real world, including theft,
fraud, and even more severe offenses like virtual rape, espionage and murder [1], [2], [3], [4]. The anonymity
and lack of physical presence in virtual worlds can embolden individuals to engage in behaviors they might
avoid in real life, leading to a unique set of challenges for law enforcement and legal systems [5], [6], [7].
One of the primary concerns in virtual worlds is the rise of cybercrime. As more individuals and businesses
engage in virtual environments, the potential for cybercrime increases. Cybercrimes in virtual worlds can include
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1135
www.rsisinternational.org
virtual theft, fraud, privacy violations, and hacking [8], [9], [10]. These crimes can have real-world implications,
as virtual property often holds significant monetary value, and the theft of such property can result in substantial
financial losses for victims. Additionally, the lack of clear legal frameworks and regulations in virtual worlds
complicates the prosecution and prevention of these crimes [2], [11], [12].
The psychological impact of crimes in virtual worlds is another critical area of concern. Victims of virtual crimes,
such as cyberbullying, stalking, and harassment, can experience significant psychological distress, including
anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [13], [14], [15]. The immersive nature of virtual
worlds can exacerbate these effects, as the experiences can feel very real to the victims [3], [16]. Studies have
shown that involvement in cyberbullying, whether as a victim or perpetrator, can lead to greater psychological
suffering, highlighting the need for effective prevention and intervention strategies [15].
Law enforcement faces significant challenges in addressing crimes in virtual worlds. Traditional methods of
investigation and prosecution may not be effective in these environments, necessitating new approaches and
legal frameworks. For example, undercover operations in virtual worlds require adaptations to existing legal
procedures to balance the need for effective investigations with the protection of individuals' rights to privacy
and fair trial. Additionally, the global nature of virtual worlds complicates jurisdictional issues, as crimes can be
committed across international borders, further challenging law enforcement efforts [12], [17].
Accordingly, crimes in virtual worlds present a complex and evolving challenge for law enforcement, legal
systems, and society as a whole. The anonymity and lack of physical presence in these environments can lead to
a range of criminal activities, from virtual theft and fraud to more severe offenses like virtual rape and murder.
The psychological impact on victims can be profound, necessitating effective prevention and intervention
strategies. Law enforcement must adapt to the unique challenges of investigating and prosecuting crimes in
virtual worlds, including addressing jurisdictional issues and developing new legal frameworks. As virtual
worlds continue to grow in popularity and complexity, ongoing research and collaboration between
policymakers, law enforcement, and technology developers will be essential to address these challenges and
ensure the safety and security of virtual environments.
Figure 1. Key concepts generated on crimes in the virtual world
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1136
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 1 illustrates a concept map that comprises four main themes supported by sixteen condensed concepts,
each chosen to capture the essential dynamics of contemporary virtual crimes shaped by artificial intelligence
and blockchain technologies. The first theme on types of cybercrime highlights core offence patterns, including
AI identity fraud, automated cyberbullying, blockchain financial scams, and smart-contract exploits, reflecting
the technological drivers behind modern illicit activity. The second theme focuses on societal impacts,
addressing how AI misinformation, algorithmic deviant behaviour, crypto-related losses, and digital trust erosion
collectively undermine social stability and economic resilience. The third theme outlines the legal framework,
emphasising the necessity of regulating AI content, ensuring blockchain evidence admissibility, strengthening
cross-border enforcement mechanisms, and advancing coherent cybercrime governance standards. The final
theme concerns prevention and education, underscoring the importance of AI threat detection, blockchain-based
identity security, digital literacy programmes, and improved law-enforcement training. Together, these themes
and concepts present a structured rationale for understanding the evolving landscape of virtual crimes,
demonstrating the interplay between emerging technologies, their misuse, and the corresponding regulatory and
preventive responses required.
As can be seen, crimes in the virtual world present multifaceted challenges that require a comprehensive
understanding of their nature, impact, and prevention. The integration of virtual spaces into daily life necessitates
a multidisciplinary approach to address the legal, regulatory, and technological aspects of virtual crimes. As
society continues to embrace virtual environments, it is imperative to develop robust legal frameworks, enhance
cybersecurity measures, and implement targeted prevention programs to mitigate the adverse effects of virtual
crimes. By doing so, we can ensure that the benefits of virtual worlds are maximised while minimising the risks
associated with criminal activities in these spaces.
Research Questions
This study investigates the following five research questions:
RQ1: What are the research trends of crimes in the virtual world according to the year of publication?
RQ2: What are the top 10 cited articles of crimes in the virtual world?
RQ3: Which are the top 10 countries on crimes in the virtual world based on number of publication?
RQ4: What are the popular keywords related to crimes in the virtual world?
RQ5: What are co-authorship by countries’ collaboration of crimes in the virtual world?
METHODOLOGY
Bibliometrics constitutes a systematic approach to the collection, organisation, and evaluation of bibliographic
data derived from scientific publications [18], [19], [20]. Rather than being confined to descriptive statistics -
such as identifying the distribution of journals, temporal trends, and leading authors [21], bibliometric analysis
extends to advanced techniques, including document co-citation analysis, which enables the mapping of
intellectual structures within a research domain. The execution of a rigorous literature review, therefore,
necessitates an iterative and methodical process of keyword selection, literature retrieval, and critical assessment,
ultimately yielding a comprehensive bibliography and robust analytical outcomes [22]. Guided by this rationale,
the present study concentrated on high-impact publications, recognising their pivotal role in illuminating the
theoretical foundations that underpin the field. To ensure reliability and precision, SCOPUS was employed as
the principal data source [23], [24], [25]. given its extensive coverage and established credibility in scholarly
research. Accordingly, publications indexed in Elsevier’s Scopus database from 2010 through 2025 were
systematically retrieved and analysed.
Data search strategy
For this study, the Scopus database was selected as the principal source of data collection due to its broad
disciplinary coverage, reliable indexing of peer-reviewed materials, and established credibility in bibliometric
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1137
www.rsisinternational.org
research. To ensure accuracy and relevance, the advanced search function in Scopus was employed, using the
following search string as shown in Table 1: TITLE ( ( crime ) AND ( technology OR cloud OR virtual OR
cyber OR online ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2009 AND PUBYEAR < 2026 AND ( LIMIT-TO ( LANGUAGE ,
"English" ) ). This query was specifically designed to capture publications focusing on crimes in relation to
technological, cyber, virtual, online, and cloud-based contexts, with the initial number of documents to be 1,348.
To maintain temporal relevance, the search was restricted to publications appearing between 2010 and 2025, a
period that corresponds with the rapid proliferation of cloud technologies, digital platforms, and cyber
environments that have redefined both the nature of criminal activity and scholarly inquiry.
In addition, to ensure consistency and accessibility of interpretation, the language criterion was limited to
English, while non-English studies were excluded to prevent issues of translation bias and uneven accessibility.
This filtering process was guided by explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria as shown in Table 2. The inclusion
parameters allowed English-language works published within 20102025 that addressed crime in
technologically mediated contexts, while the exclusion parameters systematically removed publications before
2010 or written in non-English languages. The access date of the search was October 2025, an important step in
maintaining transparency and reproducibility since bibliographic databases are continuously updated with newly
indexed publications. Following the application of these filters, a total of 1,068 documents were retrieved,
forming the final dataset for analysis. This volume of literature demonstrates both the scholarly significance of
the topic and the interdisciplinary interest it generates across fields such as criminology, law, computer science,
sociology, and information technology. Ultimately, by employing a structured and transparent search strategy,
supported by well-defined screening criteria, the study constructed a robust bibliometric dataset that balances
breadth with precision.
Table 1. The search string
Source
Search string
Scopus
TITLE ( ( crime ) AND ( technology OR cloud OR virtual OR cyber OR online ) ) AND
PUBYEAR > 2009 AND PUBYEAR < 2026 AND ( LIMIT-TO ( LANGUAGE , "English" ) )
Access date: October 2025
Table 2.
The selection criterion of searching
Criterion
Inclusion
Exclusion
Language
English
Non-English
Timeline
2010 2025
< 2010
> 2025
Data analysis
VOSviewer, developed by Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman at Leiden University, the Netherlands [26], [27]
is a widely recognised bibliometric software designed for the visualisation and analysis of scientific literature.
Renowned for its intuitive and interactive interface, the software facilitates the construction of sophisticated
network visualisations, clustering analyses, and density maps, thereby enabling scholars to discern structural
patterns and intellectual linkages within complex research domains. Its versatility extends to the mapping of co-
authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence networks, offering comprehensive insights into the
dynamics of scholarly communication. Continuous updates and methodological refinements further enhance its
analytical robustness, ensuring that both novice and advanced researchers can engage effectively with large-
scale bibliometric datasets. The software’s capacity to compute a wide range of metrics, customise visual
outputs, and integrate seamlessly with multiple bibliometric data sources positions VOSviewer as an
indispensable tool for advancing knowledge mapping and research evaluation.
A distinctive strength of VOSviewer lies in its ability to transform highly intricate bibliometric datasets into
visually interpretable maps and charts, enabling the detection of keyword co-occurrence patterns, thematic
clusters, and citation linkages. Unlike traditional bibliometric software, VOSviewer combines methodological
rigor with accessibility, thus broadening its applicability across disciplinary boundaries. Its adaptability,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1138
www.rsisinternational.org
combined with a focus on network visualisation and density mapping, ensures that research landscapes are
represented with precision and analytical clarity. The sustained development of VOSviewer has secured its
position at the forefront of bibliometric analysis, with customisable functionalities that provide scholars with
both depth and flexibility in exploring research frontiers.
For the present study, bibliometric datasets comprising publication year, title, author name, journal, citation
count, and keywords were retrieved in PlainText format from the Scopus database, covering the period from
2010 through October 2025. These datasets were processed using VOSviewer version 1.6.20, where clustering
and mapping techniques were applied to generate comprehensive knowledge maps. Methodologically,
VOSviewer provides an alternative to the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) approach by situating items within
low-dimensional spaces such that the proximity of items reflects their degree of relatedness and similarity [26].
While sharing conceptual similarities with MDS [28]. VOSviewer diverges by adopting a more refined
normalisation technique for co-occurrence frequencies, namely the association strength (ASij), which is
calculated as [29]:
𝐴𝑆
𝑖𝑗
=
𝐶
𝑖𝑗
𝑤
𝑖
𝑤
𝑗
where Cij denotes the observed co-occurrence of items i and j, and w
i
and w
j
represent their respective occurrence
frequencies. This metric is proportional to the ratio between the observed and the expected number of co-
occurrences under the assumption of statistical independence [29]. Through this methodological innovation,
VOSviewer enhances the precision of bibliometric mapping, making it a superior tool for uncovering the latent
structures underpinning scholarly domains.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This section deliberates on each of the five research questions of the study.
Research Question 1: What are the research trends of crimes in the virtual world according to the year of
publication?
The publication trend on “crimes in the virtual world” between 2010 and 2025 demonstrates a gradual but
fluctuating growth in scholarly attention as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Publication trend by year of publication
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1139
www.rsisinternational.org
In the early years, research output was relatively low, with fewer than 40 documents annually between 2010 and
2012. A slight increase began in 2013 (41 documents), followed by a notable jump in 2014 (59 documents),
reflecting the growing recognition of cybercrime as a global issue. However, this momentum temporarily slowed
in 2015 (41 documents) before picking up again from 2016 onwards. By 2017, publications had risen to 82, and
the output surged further in 2019, reaching 102 documents, this is a clear indication of the field’s growing
importance. While there were dips in 2018 (70 documents) and 2020 (78 documents), the broader trend reflects
consistent academic interest, culminating in the peak of 105 publications in 2023.
The reasons behind this pattern are closely tied to technological and societal developments. The significant rise
after 2016 corresponds with increasing global concerns over ransomware, financial cybercrimes, and dark web
activities. The peak in 2019 can be linked to worldwide debates on digital privacy and high-profile cyber
incidents, which likely spurred scholarly research. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic in 20202021 heightened
digital dependency, encouraging studies on vulnerabilities in online platforms, which explains the sustained high
numbers during these years. The sharp increase in 2023 coincides with emerging challenges such as AI-driven
cybercrime, cryptocurrency fraud, and the governance of virtual environments like the metaverse. The decline
in 2024 (96 documents) and 2025 (81 documents) may suggest a consolidation of research, with scholars
focusing on more specialised sub-fields rather than producing broader exploratory studies. Overall, the trend
underscores how the evolution of digital technologies continues to shape academic discourse on virtual world
crimes.
Research Question 2: What are the top 10 cited articles of crimes in the virtual world?
Produced below in Table 3 is the list of top 10 cited articles on the topic of crimes in the virtual world.
Table 3: Top 10 cited articles
Title
Year
Source title
Citation
count
Cyber security in the age of
COVID-19: A timeline and
analysis of cyber-crime and
cyber-attacks during the
pandemic
2021
Computers and
Security
401
A crime script analysis of the
online stolen data market
2015
British Journal of
Criminology
175
Technologies of Crime
Prediction: The Reception of
Algorithms in Policing and
Criminal Courts
2021
Social Problems
171
Accident or homicide - Virtual
crime scene reconstruction
using 3D methods
2013
Forensic Science
International
156
Organizations and cyber crime:
An analysis of the nature of
groups engaged in cyber crime
2014
International
Journal of Cyber
Criminology
137
The Scary World of Online
News? Internet News Exposure
and Public Attitudes Toward
Crime and Justice
2016
Journal of
Quantitative
Criminology
119
The internet and racial hate
crime: Offline spillovers from
online access
2016
MIS Quarterly:
Management
Information
Systems
115
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1140
www.rsisinternational.org
The affinity between online and
offline anti-Muslim hate crime:
Dynamics and impacts
2016
Aggression and
Violent Behavior
108
Cyber-Dependent Crimes: An
Interdisciplinary Review
2019
Annual Review of
Criminology
102
Investigating and prosecuting
cyber crime: Forensic
dependencies and barriers to
justice
2015
International
Journal of Cyber
Criminology
102
The citation analysis of the top ten most cited papers on crimes in the virtual world highlights several key trends
in scholarly attention and impact. The most cited article, Cyber security in the age of COVID-19 by [30], with
401 citations, reflects how the global pandemic significantly accelerated both cybercrime incidents and research
interest, making it a foundational reference point for subsequent studies. Other highly cited works, such as [31]
and [32], focus on the online stolen data market and algorithmic crime prediction in policing, respectively. Their
strong citation counts (175 and 171) suggest the academic and policy relevance of these topics, as they directly
address the intersection of technology, law enforcement, and criminal markets. Classic works such as [33] on
virtual crime scene reconstruction and [34] on organised cybercrime groups also remain influential, pointing to
the importance of both methodological innovation and understanding criminal networks in cyberspace.
The distribution of citations across themes reveals the drivers of scholarly impact in this field. Papers linked to
timely global issues, such as COVID-19 cyber-attacks or online hate crimes tend to attract higher citations
because of their immediate policy and social relevance. Studies that integrate interdisciplinary perspectives, such
as criminology, computer science, and sociology, also achieve higher visibility, as seen in [35] review on cyber-
dependent crimes. Furthermore, publications in high-impact journals like Computers and Security, MIS
Quarterly, and the British Journal of Criminology provide wider reach and recognition, contributing to greater
citation rates. Overall, the results show that scholarly impact in virtual crime research is driven by topical
urgency, interdisciplinary framing, and publication in well-established journals that bridge academic, technical,
and policy audiences.
Research Question 3: Which are the top 10 countries on crimes in the virtual world based on number of
publication?
The following Figure 3 reveals the top 10 countries based on number of publication in the area of crimes in the
virtual world.
Figure 3. Top 10 countries based on number of publications
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1141
www.rsisinternational.org
The bibliometric data shows that India (203), the United States (178), and the United Kingdom (155) dominate
research output on crimes in the virtual world, significantly outpacing other countries. This trend reflects not
only the academic capacity and research culture of these nations but also the pressing relevance of cybercrime
in their contexts. India’s lead can be attributed to its rapidly growing digital economy, high internet penetration,
and increasing incidents of cyber fraud and online crime, which drive both government and academic focus on
virtual crime research. Similarly, the United States and the United Kingdom are global technology hubs with
advanced legal, technological, and cybersecurity frameworks, making cybercrime a priority research area for
their universities, policy think tanks, and legal scholars.
The moderate output from Australia (51) and China (45), followed by Indonesia (38), the Netherlands (34), and
Canada (27), highlights regional diversity in the research landscape. For countries like China and Indonesia,
rapid digitalisation coupled with evolving legal infrastructures has spurred growing academic interest in
addressing virtual crimes. Meanwhile, smaller but technologically advanced nations such as the Netherlands and
South Korea (25) maintain a specialised focus, often tied to cybersecurity innovation and international
collaborations. Malaysia’s contribution (25) is also noteworthy, reflecting increasing government and academic
initiatives to address cybercrime challenges in Southeast Asia. Overall, the distribution suggests that publication
volume is shaped by a combination of factors: the scale of digital adoption, prevalence of cyber threats, research
infrastructure, and national policy priorities in combating virtual world crimes.
Research Question 4: What are the popular keywords related to crimes in the virtual world?
The following Figure 4 highlights the main keywords used by the authors related to the study of crimes in the
virtual world.
Figure 4: Network visualisation map of keywords’ co-occurrence
Co-occurrence analysis of author keywords using VOSviewer is a bibliometric technique that identifies how
frequently keywords appear together across publications, thereby revealing thematic structures, trends, and
research linkages in a particular field. In this case, the analysis was generated using the full counting method,
with a minimum occurrence threshold of 5, which means only keywords that appeared at least five times were
included. From the total 3,915 keywords, 259 met the threshold, and with the additional criterion of a minimum
cluster size of 5, the software generated 7 clusters. These clusters visually map the intellectual structure of
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1142
www.rsisinternational.org
research on crimes in the virtual world, showing central keywords like crime” (406 occurrences, 2,419 link
strength) and “cybercrime” (335 occurrences, 1,596 link strength), alongside interconnected terms such as cyber
security,” “digital forensics,” and “law enforcement.The clustering reflects thematic concentrations, where
closely related concepts are grouped together, highlighting the multidisciplinary intersections of criminology,
technology, and law.
The findings contribute to the body of knowledge by offering a structured understanding of how research themes
evolve and interact in the digital crime domain. The prominence of keywords like “cybercrime,” computer
crime,” and “cyber security” underscores the centrality of technological dimensions in modern criminology.
Meanwhile, emerging terms such as “machine learning,” “artificial intelligence,” “internet of things,” and
“blockchain” reveal the growing influence of advanced technologies in both criminal activity and crime
prevention strategies. Similarly, the presence of socio-legal terms like “law enforcement,” “crime prevention,”
and “legal frameworks” reflects ongoing debates about governance, regulation, and human impact. Overall, this
keyword co-occurrence analysis not only maps the landscape of current research but also signals emerging trends
and interdisciplinary collaborations, guiding scholars toward gaps in literature and new research opportunities
in cybercrime and virtual world studies.
Research Question 5: What are co-authorship by countries’ collaboration of crimes in the virtual world?
Produced below is Figure 5, depicting the network visuatisation mapping of the authors’ co-authorship
collaboration by country.
Figure 5. Network visualisation map of authors’ collaboration by country
Co-authorship by country collaboration analysis in VOSviewer is a bibliometric mapping method that identifies
research partnerships among countries based on joint publications. It shows which countries are most
interconnected in producing scholarly work, with stronger links reflecting more frequent or impactful
collaborations. In this case, the analysis used the full counting method, where each co-authorship counts equally,
with a minimum threshold of 5 documents per country. Out of 97 countries, 37 met the threshold, and by applying
a minimum cluster size of 5, the software grouped them into 8 clusters. These clusters visualise global research
collaboration patterns, where countries such as the United States (177 documents, 2,872 citations, link strength
62), the United Kingdom (154 documents, 2,289 citations, link strength 58), and Australia (52 documents, 779
citations, link strength 23) emerge as central players in international scholarly networks, forming hubs of
intellectual exchange.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1143
www.rsisinternational.org
The findings contribute to the body of knowledge by showing how research on crime in the virtual world is
shaped by global collaboration rather than isolated efforts. The dominance of Western countries (United States,
United Kingdom, Netherlands, Australia) suggests they are leading in resources, funding, and international
partnerships, while emerging economies like India (201 documents, 1,100 citations) and Malaysia (25
documents, 133 citations) reflect growing regional contributions, though with relatively lower citation impact
and collaboration strength. The clustering also highlights multi-regional connections, such as AsiaEurope
linkages (India, China, Malaysia with European partners) and Middle Eastern collaborations (Saudi Arabia,
UAE). This visualisation not only underscores existing disparities in global knowledge production but also
identifies opportunities for strengthening SouthSouth cooperation. By revealing central hubs and peripheral
contributors, the analysis guides policymakers and academics to enhance inclusive international collaboration
and balance knowledge exchange in digital crime research.
CONCLUSION
This study set out to examine the scholarly landscape of crimes in the virtual world by conducting a bibliometric
analysis of publications indexed between 2010 and 2025. The main purpose was to identify research trends,
leading contributions, geographical distribution of scholarship, influential keywords, and patterns of
international collaboration. By addressing these questions, the analysis provides a structured overview of how
the study of virtual world crimes has evolved and where it is heading.
The results reveal that research on this subject has steadily increased over the past decade, with peak productivity
occurring in 2023. Highly cited works largely reflect responses to pressing global developments, including the
rise of cybercrime during the COVID-19 pandemic, the growth of online hate speech, and the use of predictive
algorithms in law enforcement. In terms of geography, India, the United States, and the United Kingdom emerge
as leading contributors, with other regions such as Southeast Asia and China showing growing engagement.
Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlights the dominance of themes such as cybercrime, cybersecurity, and
digital forensics, while newer concepts like artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the metaverse signal emerging
interdisciplinary directions. Collaboration patterns demonstrate strong research hubs in developed countries,
with gradual expansion of contributions from developing economies.
This research contributes to the field by offering empirical evidence of both the maturity and gaps in scholarship.
It enriches existing literature by mapping knowledge structures, identifying dominant themes, and highlighting
underexplored areas, such as socio-psychological impacts of virtual crime and the development of robust legal
frameworks. For policymakers and practitioners, these findings underscore the need for cross-border
collaboration, enhanced cybersecurity strategies, and regulatory innovations to address evolving threats in digital
environments.
Nonetheless, the study is limited by its reliance on a single database, the exclusion of non-English publications,
and the inability to capture very recent works beyond the data collection period. Future research could broaden
the scope by incorporating multiple databases, examining non-English literature, and integrating qualitative
approaches to capture nuanced dimensions of virtual world crimes. Expanding collaboration among regions
currently underrepresented in the dataset would also strengthen the global dialogue on this issue.
In closing, this bibliometric study demonstrates the importance of systematic mapping in understanding how
academic inquiry adapts to the challenges posed by digital crime. By revealing trends, gaps, and emerging
directions, the analysis not only consolidates knowledge but also sets a foundation for future research and
practice. The significance of this work lies in showing that crimes in virtual environments cannot be addressed
solely within technical or legal silos but must be approached through an interdisciplinary and collaborative lens
to ensure resilience in the face of evolving digital threats.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author would like to express gratitude to Dr. Wan Azani Mustafa for providing guidance and insights in
completing this paper, and to Universiti Utara Malaysia for the resources necessary in finalising this paper.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1144
www.rsisinternational.org
REFERENCES
1. T. Gorrindo and J. E. Groves, Crime and hate in virtual worlds: A new playground for the Id,” Harv.
Rev. Psychiatry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113118, 2010, doi: 10.3109/10673221003683937.
2. A. Guinchard, Crime in virtual worlds: The limits of criminal law,” Int. Rev. Law, Comput. Technol.,
vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175182, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13600861003748284.
3. E. Haber, “The Criminal Metaverse,” Indiana Law J., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 843891, 2024, [Online].
Available:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
85197465131&partnerID=40&md5=b5a2fa27e91eaf7f73fbfd95019b89cf
4. W. R. W. Rosli, S. Kamaruddin, A. M. Mohamad, N. N. M. Saufi, and Z. Hamin, “Governing Cyber
Espionage Threats via the Integration of the Risk Society-Cyber Securitisation Theory,” in 3rd IEEE
International Virtual Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies, i-
PACT 2021, Universiti Teknologi, MARA, Faculty of Law, Selangor, Malaysia: Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021. doi: 10.1109/i-PACT52855.2021.9696812.
5. C. Barbieri, I. Grattagliano, and R. Catanesi, “Crimes without a body: reflections on a case series of
online crimes,” Forensic Sci. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 328331, 2023, doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad035.
6. M. Boskovic, G. Misev, and N. Putnik, Analyzing New Forms of Social Disorders in Modern Virtual
Environments. 2023. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5760-3.
7. S. Lakhani, “Perspectives on Internet-Based Crimes,” in Criminal Psychology and the Criminal Justice
System in India and Beyond, 2021, pp. 145153. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4570-9_9.
8. A. Bhardwaj, Navigating the metaverse: Forecasting cybercrime in the new age of virtual reality,in
Forecasting Cyber Crimes in the Age of the Metaverse, 2023, pp. 3365. doi:
10.4018/9798369302200.ch003.
9. S. D. Keene, “Emerging threats&colon; financial crime in the virtual world,” J. Money Laund. Control,
vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2537, 2011, doi: 10.1108/13685201211194718.
10. [10] N. C. Patterson and M. Hobbs, “A multidiscipline approach to governing virtual property theft in
virtual worlds,” in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2010, pp. 161171.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15479-9_15.
11. C. Chambers, Can you ever regulate the virtual world against economic crime?,” J. Int. Commer. Law
Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 339349, 2012, [Online]. Available:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
84867182025&partnerID=40&md5=e3ead851846a4080b48a6b7d0093427c
12. H. X. Qin, Y. Wang, and P. Hui, “Identity, crimes, and law enforcement in the Metaverse,” Humanit.
Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-04266-w.
13. G. C. López, A. D. de la Rosa mez, R. D. Figueroa, and X. D. Baca, Virtual reality exposure for
trauma and stress-related disorders for city violence crime victims,” in Technology, Rehabilitation and
Empowerment of People with Special Needs, 2015, pp. 6172. [Online]. Available:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
84958597023&partnerID=40&md5=1ba19251d11b6f710d0af6fd5ec1238a
14. A. Palassis, C. P. Speelman, and J. A. Pooley, “An Exploration of the Psychological Impact of Hacking
Victimization,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211061556.
15. [15] R. V. D. S. Silva, H. S. Dias Moura, P. N. A. Betetti, F. L. D. Santos, and C. M. Fortuna, “Virtual
Violence as a Contributing Factor to the Mental Health of Young People: A Scoping Review,” Can. J.
Nurs. Res., 2025, doi: 10.1177/08445621251364528.
16. [16] N. K. Singh, R. K. Ray, N. Silayach, D. P. Dash, and A. Singh, “Avatars at risk: Exploring public
response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 163, 2025, doi:
10.1016/j.chb.2024.108500.
17. [17] R. Rice, “Augmented reality tools for enhanced forensics simulations and crime scene analysis,”
in Working Through Synthetic Worlds, 2012, pp. 201213. [Online]. Available:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
84938073815&partnerID=40&md5=841c4316c34c9b3a5b27c4600ca51ddc
18. [18] J. L. Alves, I. B. Borges, and J. De Nadae, “Sustainability in complex projects of civil
construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review,” Gest. e Prod., vol. 28, no. 4, 2021, doi:
10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389.
19. D. S. Assyakur and E. M. Rosa, “Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis,” J. Aisyah
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1145
www.rsisinternational.org
J. Ilmu Kesehat., vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.30604/jika.v7i2.914.
20. A. Verbeek, K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and E. Zimmermann, Measuring progress and evolution in
science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 4, no.
2, pp. 179211, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1468-2370.00083.
21. Y. C. J. Wu and T. Wu, “A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions
in theory and practice,” 2017. doi: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518.
22. B. Fahimnia, J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani, Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric
analysis,” 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003.
23. A. Al-Khoury et al., “Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus
Database,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141811615.
24. G. di Stefano, M. Peteraf, and G. Veronay, Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic
investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain,” Ind. Corp.
Chang., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 11871204, 2010, doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq027.
25. G. P. Khiste and R. R. Paithankar, “Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus,” Int. Res. J., vol. 01, no.
32, pp. 7883, 2017.
26. N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric
mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
27. N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and
VOSviewer,” Scientometrics, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 10531070, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
28. F. P. Appio, F. Cesaroni, and A. Di Minin, “Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual
property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 101,
no. 1, pp. 623661, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0.
29. N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field, in
International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 2007, pp. 625645. doi:
10.1142/S0218488507004911.
30. ]H. S. Singh Lallie et al., “Cyber security in the age of COVID-19: A timeline and analysis of cyber-
crime and cyber-attacks during the pandemic,” Comput. Secur., vol. 105, 2021, doi:
10.1016/j.cose.2021.102248.
31. A. Hutchings and T. J. Holt, “A crime script analysis of the online stolen data market,” Br. J. Criminol.,
vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 596614, 2015, doi: 10.1093/bjc/azu106.
32. S. Brayne and A. Christin, “Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing
and Criminal Courts,” Soc. Probl., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 608624, 2021, doi: 10.1093/socpro/spaa004.
33. U. Buck, S. Naether, B. Räss, C. Jackowski, and M. J. Thali, “Accident or homicide - Virtual crime scene
reconstruction using 3D methods,” Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 225, no. 13, pp. 7584, 2013, doi:
10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.015.
34. R. Broadhurst, P. Grabosky, M. Alazab, and S. Chon, “Organizations and cyber crime: An analysis of
the nature of groups engaged in cyber crime,” Int. J. Cyber Criminol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 120, 2014,
[Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
84901820106&partnerID=40&md5=b28b5a91fa6e528515e3d480d1eb70df
35. D. Maimon and E. R. Louderback, “Cyber-Dependent Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Review,” Annu. Rev.
Criminol., vol. 2, pp. 191216, 2019, doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092057.