INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1191
www.rsisinternational.org
Shared Micro-mobility Adoption: A Qualitative Investigation of User
Motives for Electric Scooters and E-Bicycles
Khouloud Gammoudi
1*
, Kaouther Saied Benrached
2
1
PhD in Marketing Faculty of Economic and Management of Tunis Research Laboratory: Business and
Marketing Research (ERMA)
2
University Professor Faculty of Economic and Management of Tunis Research Laboratory: Business
and Marketing Research (ERMA)
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100093
Received: 20 November 2025; Accepted: 26 November 2025; Published: 01 December 2025
ABSTRACT
In response to environmental challenges and increasing urban congestion, micro-mobility emerges as a
sustainable solution for short-distance urban travel. It reduces the carbon footprint while offering speed and
flexibility. This study investigates user motivations for adopting electric bicycles and electric scooters based on
21 semi-structured interviews. The results reveal four key motivations: utilitarian (practicality and time savings),
environmental (reducing ecological impact), hedonic (enjoyment and travel comfort), and social (peer influence
and social image). The adoption of micro-mobility extends beyond mere practical function; it reflects a
considered choice that combines efficiency, ecological responsibility, and social valuation. These findings
identify the determining factors for supporting the expansion of these transport modes and offer strategic
guidance for designing urban policies and innovative, sustainable mobility solutions tailored to the actual needs
of users.
Keywords: shared micro-mobilityelectric bicycles and scooters – motivations – usage .
INTRODUCTION
Cities worldwide face increasing urban congestion, driven by rapid urbanization and a continuous rise in the
number of private vehicles. This situation leads to frequent delays, heightened air pollution, noise disturbances,
and considerable pressure on transport infrastructure (Cheng., 2024). Confronted with this urgency, rethinking
urban mobility is no longer an option but an absolute necessity to ensure sustainable and livable cities (Kalašová
& Čulík., 2023). In this context, micro-mobility presents itself as an innovative and promising solution. It
encompasses lightweight transport modes such as bicycles, electric scooters, and other micro-vehicles, whether
privately owned or shared. These new forms of urban mobility enable rapid, flexible travel suited for
shortdistance trips and contribute to reducing dependence on private cars and the ecological footprint of cities
(Kazemzadeh & Ronchi, 2022). Their growth is accompanied by significant technological advances, particularly
the development of connected rental systems and smart applications that facilitate the management and
optimization of travel.
In Tunisia, micro-mobility is developing progressively, but through modalities distinct from those observed in
European countries. In Europe, the use of light vehicles such as electric scooters or bicycles relies on digital
platforms that facilitate geolocation, reservation, and instant unlocking via a mobile application. The Tunisian
model, however, remains largely based on a centralized approach. In practice, users must go to a rental point or
physical store to rent the scooter or bicycle and then return it to the same location at the end of their journey.
Although numerous studies have already analyzed the impact of shared micro-mobility (electric bicycles,
scooters, and mopeds) on the environment in developed countries, the phenomenon remains emergent in Tunisia.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1192
www.rsisinternational.org
This underscores the importance of the present study for better understanding user behaviors within this specific
context. Against this backdrop, the current research examines the determinants for adopting shared
micromobility, specifically the use of shared electric bicycles and scooters by Tunisians. It aims to answer the
following question: What factors motivate individuals to adopt and use shared electric bicycles and scooters?
The objective is to understand the motivations guiding the choice of these transport modes and the levers likely
to foster their integration into daily mobility. To achieve this, a qualitative study, based on semi-structured
interviews with users, will be adopted. This methodology will enable a deep understanding of the motivations
for using electric bicycles and scooters and provide concrete pathways to encourage regular and environmentally
respectful usage.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The Sharing Economy and Shared Micro-Mobility
The sharing economy constitutes a genuine paradigm shift from traditional models based on the ownership of
goods (Schlagwein et al., 2020). It promotes the utilization of underused resources and transforms sometimes
idle assets into collective services capable of meeting an immediate need (Felländer et al., 2015). The principle
of sharing applies to several domains, such as accommodation (Airbnb), vehicles (car-sharing, ride-sharing), and
material goods (tools, DIY, or electronic equipment), and has more recently expanded to urban mobility with
micro-mobility.
Shared micro-mobility now represents one of the major innovations in urban transport. It refers to the collective
use of lightweight, low-speed vehicles such as bicycles, scooters, and mopeds, which allow users to travel
without assuming the costs and constraints associated with individual ownership (Cohen & Shaheen., 2018).
These micro-vehicles, typically weighing less than 350 kg and limited to 45 km/h, offer multiple advantages,
particularly in terms of flexibility, rapid access, efficiency, noise reduction, and limited use of urban space
(Yanocha & Allan., 2019). From this perspective, free-floating electric bicycle and scooter services are fully
aligned with the growing dynamic of the sharing economy applied to mobility. They constitute a recent evolution
of shared mobility systems, extending and enriching the experiences of car-sharing and bike-sharing developed
in recent years (Weschke., 2022). Their massive deployment in many major cities across America, Europe, and
Asia reflects their strategic role in contemporary transport networks. These solutions are particularly well-suited
to addressing first- and last-mile travel needs. This refers to trips between home or workplace and public transport
stops, areas often difficult to access by conventional vehicles, and they help facilitate access to collective
transport in areas often poorly served by traditional vehicles (Tzouras., 2025).
Behavior related to the use of free-floating electric bicycles and scooters remains largely dependent on individual
perceptions, local constraints, and the socio-cultural specificities unique to each territory. These observations
justify the implementation of an in-depth empirical investigation to identify the factors that structure the daily
use of these solutions. It is within this perspective that the present methodological approach, detailed below, is
situated.
METHODOLOGY
To address the research objective and understand user motivations for shared electric bicycles and scooters, an
exploratory qualitative study was conducted with a sample of 21 users of free-floating electric scooters and
bicycles. The participants, aged 17 to 42, consisted of 11 men and 10 women from diverse professional
backgrounds, which enabled the collection of a variety of perspectives and usage patterns. Semi-structured
interviews served as the data collection tool, allowing the discussion to be guided around predefined themes
while giving participants the freedom to express their perceptions and motivations. The interview guide (Table
1) was structured around three main areas: travel habits, motivations regarding shared micro-mobility, and usage
behavior.
A preliminary syntactic analysis of the corpus was performed to examine the structure of the respondents
discourse. This step, based on a careful reading of the verbatim transcripts, enabled the identification of recurrent
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1193
www.rsisinternational.org
expressions, discursive oppositions, and initial linguistic patterns (Delacroix et al., 2021). It constituted an
essential preparatory phase prior to the thematic analysis, providing an initial understanding of how individuals
construct and articulate their discourse concerning their micro-mobility practices and perceptions.
To analyze the collected data, a thematic content analysis was employed, in accordance with the methodological
recommendations of Thiétart (2025). This technique facilitated the identification and grouping of recurring ideas
within the discourse. The themes retained for analysis were those mentioned at least twice by the respondents.
Table 1: The Interview Guide
Theme
Objectives
Questions
Travel Habits
To understand the
respondents general mobility
context.
Can you tell me about your daily moiblity habits?
Which means of transport do you use most frequently?
In which situations do you choose an electric scooter or
bicycle?
Usage
Motivations
To explore the full range of
motivations that lead users to
adopt these transport modes.
What motivates you to use an electric scooter or bicycle rather
than another means of transport?
What do you like or find appealing about this mode of travel?
What does using this type of transport represent for you?
What do you feel when you use them?
Why do you continue to use them today?
Comportement
d’usage
To understand the
respondents current usage
behavior, their intention to
continue using electric
scooters or bicycles, and their
willingness to recommend
these transport modes to
others.
How frequently do you currently use an electric scooter or
bicycle?
In which situations or for what types of trips do you use them
most often?
Do you plan to continue using them in the future? Why or why
not?
Would you recommend the use of an electric scooter or
bicycle to other people? Why?
The interviews were conducted in person and lasted an average of 25 to 40 minutes. All interviews were recorded
with the prior consent of the participants and subsequently transcribed in full to ensure a rigorous analysis of the
discourse. The data analysis relied on a thematic analysis method, which involves identifying, coding, and
grouping recurrent ideas into conceptual categories. This approach enabled the emergence of the explanatory
factors that influence the adoption of shared mobility.
RESULTS
The analysis of interviews conducted with 21 users highlighted several key factors influencing the use of shared
micro-mobility services. These results reflect an evolution in mobility behaviors, characterized by a search for
practicality, accessibility, and flexibility, alongside a growing commitment to more sustainable and
environmentally responsible transport solutions.
Utilitarian Motivation: Time Savings and Practicality
Users indicated that electric scooters and bicycles enable them to travel quickly and without physical exertion
for daily trips, such as grocery shopping or accessing nearby services. This flexibility makes urban transport
more practical and better suited to immediate needs. As explained by Mohamed, age 22: I rent the scooter to
do all my shopping in one trip, at the supermarket or the pharmacy, and I also get to let off a little steam; its
much simpler and more pleasant than taking the car.For him, as for many users, these transport modes offer
time savings, allowing them to avoid traffic and the constraints associated with parking, and to complete multiple
tasks in a single journey. Daily commutes thereby become faster, simpler, and more efficient.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1194
www.rsisinternational.org
Users appreciate the freedom to travel at their own pace, choosing their own route and departure time. This
autonomy allows them to organize their trips according to their personal needs and daily contingencies, without
relying on buses or taxis. As Houda (age 26) emphasizes: I like being able to leave whenever I want and take
the fastest route, without having to wait for a bus or chase after a taxi.According to users, this independence
makes daily mobility less stressful and more enjoyable. The simple ability to decide one’s own route provides a
sense of control and comfort that transforms an ordinary trip into a fluid and personalized experience. It is this
simple ,yet valuable freedom that encourages users to regularly choose shared electric bicycles or scooters.
Hedonic Motivation
The interviews reveal that the use of electric scooters and bicycles extends beyond mere transportation to become
an experience that is a source of pleasure and well-being. These transport modes help reduce daily stress and
integrate light physical activity into daily commutes. This combination makes mobility a solution that is
simultaneously practical, enjoyable, and beneficial for health. Participants describe these trips as freer and more
dynamic than those made using traditional transport. According to Salma: Using the electric bike relaxes me
and allows me to get a bit of exercise during my city commutes,while Ahmed states: Riding a scooter is
practical, it lets me blow off steam and makes my trips more pleasant.For Mehdi (age 20), A short daily ride
on a scooter with my friends allows me to get around, enjoy the city, and relax at the same time.The hedonic
dimension associated with using these services appears as a key factor in their adoption, transforming daily
commutes into more stimulating and enjoyable moments.
Environmental and Ethical Motivation
Environmental awareness emerged as one of the fundamental factors for using shared electric scooters and
bicycles. Several users stated a desire to reduce their personal carbon footprint and contribute to the fight against
pollution and global warming. Sami (age 39) illustrates this point by declaring: I try to limit my car trips to
favor more ecological alternatives.This ecological sensitivity is accompanied by an adherence to the logic of
the circular economy, where sharing a single vehicle among multiple users is perceived as a responsible act. As
Selim (age 35) emphasizes: Using shared vehicles helps optimize available resources and reduce waste.
Finally, some users integrate this shared mobility into a sustainable lifestyle, combining ecological practices with
urban travel. Maher confirms: I rent an electric bicycle at least once a week because it aligns with my
sustainable lifestyle and my ecological choices.
Social Motivation
During the interviews, participants mentioned that the use of shared electric scooters and bicycles is not limited
to practical aspects. For several of them, these transport modes also, allow them to affirm their belonging to a
modern, connected urban generation that is open to new ways of living. As Manel (age 17) indicates: When I
rent a scooter, it’s also to show that I am part of a generation that lives differently in the city and adopts
innovative practices. This social motivation fits within a contemporary perspective of collaborative
consumption and the sharing economy, where the adoption of micro-mobility transcends a purely utilitarian
function. It offers users a means to express their identity, position themselves within a modern urban community,
and participate in innovative and shared practices.
Managerial Implications
The findings of this study enable the proposal of concrete recommendations to strengthen the development of
shared micro-mobility in Tunisia, for both public authorities and service operators. Public authorities can foster
this evolution by implementing suitable public policies, clear regulatory frameworks, and incentives for the
adoption of sustainable transport modes.
For electric scooter and bicycle service managers, opportunities lie in optimizing vehicle accessibility and
availability, as well as in enhancing the user experience through innovative digital solutions. These include
booking applications, real-time tracking, flexible pricing offers, and personalized services. Furthermore,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1195
www.rsisinternational.org
communication and awareness campaigns can highlight the environmental and practical benefits of these
transport modes, thereby encouraging regular use. By combining these initiatives, public and private
stakeholders can establish shared micro-mobility as a central pillar of a modern, sustainable, and efficient urban
mobility system, capable of addressing the environmental and socio-economic challenges faced by cities.
CONCLUSION
This study has illuminated the motivations underlying the use of shared electric bicycles and scooters and offers
perspectives for developing strategies that promote the use of these innovative transport modes. A qualitative
study involving 21 users identified that the primary motivations are utilitarian, hedonic, social, and
environmental. These results demonstrate that the adoption of these mobility modes is not limited to functional
needs but is also embedded in personal, social, and sustainable considerations. The findings offer pathways for
developing strategies and policies aimed at encouraging regular, sustainable, and environmentally respectful
usage.
Despite its contributions, this study has certain limitations. It is based on a limited qualitative sample, which
restricts the generalizability of the results to the entire population of shared electric scooter and bicycle users.
Furthermore, the collected data reflect motivations at a single point in time, preventing an understanding of their
evolution over the long term.
To strengthen these findings, it would be pertinent to conduct longitudinal research to track the evolution of
motivations and behaviors over the long term, alongside quantitative studies to measure the relative importance
of different motivations and to generalize the conclusions. Such work would contribute to a better identification
of the levers capable of fostering regular, sustainable, and environmentally respectful usage. In particular, it
would provide important strategic recommendations for urban policymakers and micro-mobility operators
seeking to promote alternative, efficient, and ecological transport modes.
REFERENCES
1. Cheng, W., Yang, J., Wu, X., Zhang, T., & Yin, Z. (2024). A quantitative study on factors influencing
user satisfaction of micro-mobility in China in the post-sharing era. Sustainability, 16(4), 1637.
2. Cohen, A., & Shaheen, S. (2018). Planning for shared mobility.
3. Delacroix, E., Jolibert, A., Monnot, É. et Jourdan, P. (2021). Chapitre 6. L’analyse des données
qualitatives et documentaires. Gestion Sup , 151-177.
4. Felländer, A., Ingram, C., & Teigland, R. (2015). Sharing economy. In embracing change with caution.
Näringspolitiskt Forum Rapport (Vol. 11).
5. Kalašová, A., & Čuk, K. (2023). The micromobility tendencies of people and their transport behavior.
Applied Sciences, 13(19), 10559.
6. Kazemzadeh, K., & Ronchi, E. (2022). From bike to electric bike level-of-service. Transport reviews,
42(1), 6-31.
7. Kazemzadeh, K., & Ronchi, E. (2022). From bike to electric bike level-of-service. Transport reviews,
42(1), 6-31.
8. Schlagwein, D., Schoder, D., & Spindeldreher, K. (2020). Consolidated, systemic conceptualization, and
definition of the “sharing economy”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
71(7), 817-838.
9. Thiétart, R. A. (2025). Méthodes de recherche en management-5e éd. Dunod..
10. Tzouras, P. G., Pastia, V., Kaparias, I., & Kepaptsoglou, K. (2025). Exploring the effect of perceived
safety in first/last mile mode choices. Transportation, 52(5), 2145-2183.
11. Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., & Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact
on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,
112, 103468.
12. Yanocha, D., & Allan, M. (2019). The electric assist: Leveraging e-bikes and e-scooters for more livable
cities. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1196
www.rsisinternational.org
APPENDICES
Appendix 1:
Table : Example of the Lexical Analysis of Usage Motivations for Micro-Mobility Among Users
Interview
Age
SocioProfessional
Category
Verbatim
Themes
Manel
17
Student
“When I use the scooter, it is also to show
that I belong to a generation that lives
differently in the city and adopts
innovative practices.
Social
Ahmed
25
Employee
“I go out in a group on scooters to let off
steam and enjoy the journey together.
Hedonic
Asma
22
Student
“It is cool and modern to use the shared
bike, it shows that I am up-to-date and
modern.
Social
Sami
39
Sales Agent
“Trips on an electric bicycle are pleasant,
they relax me and allow me to stay
physically active.
Hedonic
Nour
19
Student
“…It is fun and allows me to enjoy the
journey.
Hedonic
Hanen
26
Administrative
Assistant
“It is fast, flexible, and I save time every
day.
Utilitarian
Mohamed
22
Student
“I rent the scooter to do all my shopping
in one go, at the supermarket or the
pharmacy, and I also take the opportunity
to let off a little steam; it is much simpler
and more pleasant than taking the car.
Hedonic
Selim
35
Dentist
“Using shared vehicles makes it possible
to optimize available resources and
reduce inefficiency.
Environmental
Tarek
41
Business Owner
“I prefer the shared bicycle because it is
economical and environmentally
friendly.”
Environmental
Mehdi
20
Student
“A short daily ride on a scooter with my
friends allows me to get around, enjoy the
city, and relax at the same time.”
Hedonic