INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1523
www.rsisinternational.org
Implementation Strategies and Institutional Challenges of China's Basic
Education Policy
Khadija Ally Kisanzo, Ebrima Saine, Martha N. Mgalla
Zhejiang Normal University, China
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100121
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 02 December 2025
ABSTRACT
China's basic education reforms, following national plans such as the 2010-2020 National Plan and the
Education Modernization 2035 strategy, have effectively increased access to education and created a system
that focuses on both quality and fairness. However, this organized literature review shows a big difference
between what policies intend to do and how they are actually carried out at the local level. The study says that
although approaches like fiscal equalization and teacher rotation make sense, they don't work well because
there are deep-seated problems within the system. These include a culture that focuses too much on exams,
which stops new teaching methods from being used, not enough rewards for teachers, and the harmful side
effects of policies like closing down schools in rural areas. Ongoing problems such as the hukou system and
the digital divide make inequality worse. The study says that to be successful in the future, we need to go
beyond just creating policies. We should focus on building stronger local abilities, making sure everyone's
goals match, and using methods that fit the specific situation to ensure fair results for all.
Keywords: China Education Reform, Policy Implementation, Institutional Challenges, Educational Equity,
Teacher Policy, Evaluation Reform, Double Reduction Policy.
INTRODUCTION
China's education reform has followed a long-term, strategic plan designed to improve fairness, educational
standards, and modernization. The education plan from 2010 to 2020 set up a system where money is shared
fairly, schools are managed at the county level, and all students can enrol, which helped more people get
access to education and lessened differences between regions. Based on these accomplishments, the Education
Modernization 2035 plan focused on improving teacher skills, updating how schools are assessed, and
increasing accountability through governance based on performance (CPC & State Council, 2010; 2019). One
significant achievement was the Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation (2020/2021),
which shifted from assessments based mainly on exams to a more comprehensive approach that looks at school
quality, how well teaching works, and the well-being of students. Even though there has been a move towards
progress, the way things are being put into action locally is not the same everywhere. This is because some
areas lack the necessary skills and resources to manage changes effectively, and there is still a strong focus on
exam results in many places (CPC & State Council, 2020). Equity is still a big issue because differences
between rural and urban areas, unequal money situations in different regions, and rules tied to hukou status
keep people from getting good education (Guo, 2023; MOE, 2022). To fix these differences, China started
moving teachers around, gave money to poorer areas, and combined some rural schools. These policies helped
improve infrastructure and how teachers were spread out, but they also had some unexpected effects. For
example, some minority students felt left out, and the local culture started to fade away (Hannum & Wang,
2022). Changes in teacher training, like the Free Teacher Education program, helped more teachers become
available but still had problems with keeping teachers, offering good reasons to stay, and letting teachers make
their own decisions at work (Zhou, 2019). Recent changes, like the Double Reduction Policy from 2021, aimed
to cut down on too much homework and control the private tutoring businesses so that all students have fair
access to good education. However, weak enforcement, public doubt, and continued parent requests for
tutoring have made it less effective (Li & Li, 2023). Similarly, the 2022 Compulsory Education Curriculum
Standards focused on competency-based learning, which highlights creativity and problem-solving skills, but
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1524
www.rsisinternational.org
in poorer rural schools, there hasn’t been much progress in putting these ideas into practice (MOE, 2022; Wei,
2022).
China has also tried using ICT in education, like live- streaming lessons and co-teaching projects. These efforts
have helped rural areas get better access to education, but they still have problems with keeping them going
and having enough support systems (Guo et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2024). At the same time, a shrinking
population has caused fewer kids to attend preschool and some kindergartens to close, showing problems in
early childhood education even though the government is spending more money on it (FT, 2025; Springer,
2020). China's education reforms show major advancements in working toward Sustainable Development Goal
4, which aims to provide inclusive and fair quality education, but there are still some ongoing challenges that
need to be addressed. These issues involve differences between rural and urban areas, problems with
supporting teachers, teaching methods that focus too much on exams, and policies that are not applied equally
everywhere. Fixing these issues needs a bigger, long-term approach that improves teachers' enthusiasm, makes
sure opportunities are fair for everyone, and boosts the ability of local communities to manage education
effectively. More study is needed to check how well reforms work, especially when it comes to fairness,
following the right policies, and keeping education improvements going over time.
Significance
This study is important for policymakers, teachers, and organizations working on international development. It
offers a clear look at the big difference between strong policies and how they are actually carried out in China's
basic education changes. It provides important information about the system's institutional obstacles, like the
strong exam-focused culture, differences in money across regions, and reward systems that don't match what's
needed to achieve fairness and good quality. By looking at evidence from many different areas of reform, the
research creates a full picture of how big changes happen in China's education system. It also gives useful
ideas for other countries facing similar issues like scaling up, making sure everyone has fair access, and
modernizing. This helps create better, more suitable policies around the world.
Research Questions
1. What are the key strategies adopted by Chinese government to implement basic education policies since
the 1986 compulsory education law?
2. What institutional challenges hinder the effective implementation of basic education policies in less-
developed provinces?
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study used a qualitative, desk-based approach and conducted a systematic literature review. The SLR
method was chosen because it's thorough and clear, offering a structured way to find, assess, and combine
existing research. This helps create a detailed understanding of policy structures, challenges within institutions,
and methods used to implement policies in China's basic education system (Booth, Sutton, & Papaioannou,
2016). This method works best when there's a lot of written information available, especially for questions
about rules or government policies.
Sources and Procedures
The research used secondary data from various sources to make sure the analysis was both comprehensive and
detailed.
Data Sources included:
1. Academic Literature: Articles published in journals that have been reviewed by experts, books written by
scholars, and papers presented at academic conferences that offer both theoretical ideas and research-based
findings.
2. Official documents: Official documents include policy directions, statistical information, and reports from
government agencies, especially the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE, 2023).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1525
www.rsisinternational.org
3. International Publications: Comparative studies and reports from global organizations like UNESCO
(2023), the OECD (2023), and the World Bank (2023).
A clear and fair way was used to collect the data. Keyword searches for terms like "China Basic Education
Policy," "education policy implementation in China," and "institutional challenges in education reform" were
done on academic databases such as JSTOR, Scopus, and Google Scholar, as well as the official websites of
related organizations.
Inclusion And Exclusion
Nine clear inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to keep the focus and ensure relevance. The review
looked at documents from 2010 up to 2023 to make sure the analysis shows the latest changes and
improvements. Non-peer-reviewed articles, opinion pieces, and works published before 2010 were not
included, following the standard guidelines for systematic literature reviews as outlined by Booth et al. in 2016.
Data Analysis
The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, as described by Braun and Clarke in 2006. This process
involved several stages:
1. Familiarization involves reading the chosen materials carefully and going through them again to
understand them better.
2. Coding involves systematically labelling important ideas, main topics, and repeated problems found
throughout the dataset.
3. Theme Development: Finding and grouping similar codes together to form larger, more meaningful
themes that answer the research questions.
4. Reviewing, figuring out, and giving names to the themes to make sure they correctly show what the data
means.
5. Reporting involves putting together the main themes into a clear and logical story that carefully examines
and combines the evidence.
SLR Component
Description
Search Terms
“China basic education policy”, “education policy implementation in China”,
“institutional challenges in education reform”, and related keyword combinations.
Databases and
Sources
Academic databases: JSTOR, Scopus, Google Scholar. Official/government sites:
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE). International
organizations: UNESCO, OECD, World Bank.
Inclusion Criteria
Publications from 20102023; peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and
conference papers; official policy documents and statistical reports from MOE;
comparative and analytical reports from international organizations; studies directly
addressing basic education policy structures, implementation, and institutional
challenges in China.
Exclusion Criteria
Documents published before 2010; non-peer-reviewed materials (e.g., opinion pieces,
blogs, newspaper articles); sources not focused on China’s basic education or not
related to policy/implementation/institutional issues; duplicate records.
Thematic Analysis
Familiarization
Repeated, careful reading of all included documents to gain an in-depth understanding
of policy frameworks, implementation processes, and institutional contexts.
Thematic Analysis
Coding
Systematic labelling of key ideas, recurring concepts, and challenges (e.g., governance
structures, resource gaps, teacher capacity, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms).
Thematic Analysis
Theme Development
Grouping similar codes into broader themes (e.g., “policy design and structure”,
“implementation mechanisms”, “institutional barriers”, “support and capacity-building
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1526
www.rsisinternational.org
strategies”).
Thematic Analysis
Reviewing and
Naming Themes
Refining, merging, or separating themes; checking that each theme accurately
represents the underlying coded data; assigning clear, descriptive names to each theme.
Thematic Analysis
Reporting
Organizing the final themes into a coherent narrative that explains how China’s basic
education policies are structured, how they are implemented, what institutional
challenges arise, and how different studies address these issues.
Validity and Reliability
To improve the study's trustworthiness, various methods were used. Triangulation was important because the
results were supported by different kinds of sources, like academic, government, and international ones, to
reduce the chance of bias. Focusing on peer-reviewed articles and official documents helped ensure strict
academic and institutional standards. All steps in gathering and analyzing the data were carefully written down
to make sure everything was clear and could be repeated later. The study also got help from informal peer
review, where coworkers gave feedback on choosing sources and explaining findings, which made the
conclusions more reliable (Flick, 2018). 9. Since the study is based entirely on desk research and uses
secondary data, there was no direct contact with human participants, which means there were no risks related
to consent or confidentiality.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical responsibility was kept by following academic rules closely: every source was properly cited,
copyright laws were followed, and plagiarism was carefully avoided. To keep things honest and meet academic
standards, it was important to clearly share how the research was done and what was found (Creswell &
Creswell, 2018).
LIMITATIONS
The study recognizes some limitations that come with its design. Its dependence on secondary data means the
analysis is based on the accuracy, coverage, and possible biases found in already published sources, rather than
on original, direct evidence collected through research. One major challenge was the language difference;
since many key policy documents are in Mandarin, the analysis mostly used English sources, which might
reduce access to detailed local viewpoints. Institutional reports from organizations such as UNESCO or the
World Bank might present issues in a way that supports their own goals and priorities. Although there are
some limits, using multiple sources and carefully analyzing the information helps reduce their effect on the
study's main findings.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
China’s Long Reform Arc: Strategic Frameworks, Central Steering, and Evaluation Reform
A key part of China's basic education reform is using a step-by-step, top-level design approach to make sure
that local actions match the country's main goals. Since the 20102020 National Plan for Education Reform
and Development, various frameworks have aimed to provide "balanced and high-quality" compulsory
education, with county-level administration acting as the main system (CPC & State Council, 2010). The
Ministry of Education (MOE, 2022, 2023) says that compulsory education now includes more than 150 million
students and 10 million teachers. This is made possible through special programs like building schools in rural
areas, giving out free textbooks, and helping students who live away from home by providing financial support.
In 2019 and 2020, Kec035 and the Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation moved
forward with these goals by changing the focus from just exam results to a broader range of indicators that
measure both learning and well-being (CPC & State Council, 2019, 2020; Yan & Yang, 2021). However,
studies show that local officials still deal with stress from tough exams and what parents want, which leads to
uneven how policies are carried out (Huang, Liu, & Zhang, 2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1527
www.rsisinternational.org
Equity Finance, County Governance, and School Network Restructuring
China's efforts to reform its education system have focused on using money transfers from the government and
managing schools at the county level to reduce differences between urban and rural areas (Guo, 2023). County
governments act as the basic units for ensuring fairness in governance. They are responsible for assigning
teachers, managing school facilities, and creating maps that show how schools are spread out. Even though
some progress has been made in reducing differences between provinces, inequality still exists within counties
because of differences in how well local governments can manage and handle money (Guo, 2024). School
consolidation, also called school mapping, aims to make the best use of resources by combining smaller rural
schools into bigger ones. Research shows that this situation often leads to long travel times, stress from
crowded places, and feeling out of place culturally for kids from rural areas and ethnic minorities (Hannum &
Wang, 2022; Hannum, An, & Wang, 2022). These results show that we need extra efforts like helping with
travel costs, teaching in both languages, and getting people in the community involved to make sure everyone
has fair chances.
Teacher Workforce, Rotation, and Incentive Challenges
Teacher policy continues to be a key part of China's education reforms. The Free Teacher Education (FTE)
program has helped increase the number of teachers since the 1970s (Zhou, 2019), and new policies about
teacher rotation and moving them around are trying to fix differences in the quality of teaching. Studies from
Liaoning Province show that to make rotation work well, there need to be helpful support things like housing
help, chances for promotion, and rewards for career growth. These supports help people stay in their jobs
longer (Liao, 2017; Li, 2023; Zhongquan, 2024). On the other hand, weak incentives lead to higher staff
turnover and resistance (Cheng, 2020). Teacher appraisal changes connected to the 2020 evaluation system are
slowly moving the focus to how well teachers teach and how much students are involved in class, but strong
traditions that value exams above all else are still making it hard to change teaching methods (Li, 2024).
Curriculum Modernization, Digitalization, and Systemic Constraints
The 2022 Compulsory Education Curriculum Standards represent a major change in education, focusing more
on students' abilities to ask questions, think critically, and be creative (MOE, 2022). This modern approach to
teaching is also supported by a digital transformation plan called Education Informatization 2.0. This plan
helps create smart school environments and ensures fair access to digital learning through initiatives such as
live-streamed classes and the use of two teachers working together in the same classroom (Wang & Li, 2022;
Guo, Xu, & Wang, 2022; Sun, Liu, & Ma, 2024). However, putting these parallel reforms into action runs up
against major system challenges. One major issue is the ongoing focus on exam-based methods, especially the
gaokao and selective school admissions, which limit new teaching approaches and encourage memorization
instead of real understanding (OECD, 2016). Additionally, achieving success is made harder because not
everyone has equal access to the important help they need. In rural areas, teachers often don't get enough
training for the new curriculum, there aren't enough learning materials available, and the technology systems
are not reliable (Wei, 2022; Luo, 2023). The long-term success of digital projects depends on having enough
funding over time and involving teachers from the local area in a real way, which is not always the case (Lin,
Chen, & Zhang, 2024). So, unless these basic problems are solved, the ability of updating the curriculum and
using digital tools to provide fair and good education won't be very strong.
Shadow Education, Demographic Shifts, and Systemic Adaptation
The 2021 Double Reduction policy was introduced to reduce students' workload and control the profit-driven
tutoring industry (CPC & State Council, 2021), and this happens at the same time as major changes in
population trends are affecting early childhood education. Although the policy has reduced big tutoring
companies, small tutoring groups are still around because parents remain worried about getting their kids into
good schools (Li & Li, 2023; Ding & Wu, 2024). How well this crackdown works also depends on how strictly
it's enforced in different areas and the quality of after-school programs available to the public (Zhang, Chen, &
Sun, 2023). At the same time, a shrinking number of students is changing the way education is shaped. A 25%
decrease in preschool enrollments between 2020 and 2024 caused more than 41,000 kindergartens to close,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1528
www.rsisinternational.org
according to the Financial Times in 2025. This shrinking population offers a chance to shift focus from
increasing numbers to improving quality, but there are still big challenges in the system that make it hard to do
so. Persistent shortages of qualified teachers and poor rural facilities keep preventing fair access to quality
early childhood education (Springer, 2020; MOE, 2022). These similar problems show how complicated it is
for rules and population changes to work together, so we need flexible approaches that deal with both the
private education that happens outside official systems and the way the public education system is changing
over time.
Inclusion Challenges and Cross-Cutting Institutional Barriers
Even though there are policies aimed at making education accessible to everyone, many students who are
already at a disadvantage still face big challenges in getting included, showing that there are deep problems
within the system itself. Migrant children often struggle to get into schools because of the hukou system and
decisions made by local officials (Chen, 2023; Li, 2024). At the same time, children who stay behind in their
hometowns face emotional and academic challenges and have access to very few support programs (UNICEF
China, 2024; Wikipedia, 2025). Children with disabilities face being left out because schools often don’t have
the right tools, trained staff, or real effort to provide inclusive education, even though there are laws that
require it (Human Rights Watch, 2013). These particular problems show that there are bigger, widespread
issues within the systems in place. The hukou system shows how structural policies can hurt fairness, and the
lack of support for disabled students highlights ongoing money shortages that limit what local areas can do.
These barriers are connected to other bigger problems in the system, like a strong focus on exams that stops
new teaching methods from being used, reward systems for teachers that don't stop them from leaving, and
technology projects that don't work well unless the local community takes charge. To truly realize the potential
of China's education reforms, it's important to fix these institutional issues by improving how decisions are
made and held accountable, and by better understanding and working with the cultural and social factors that
influence education.
DISCUSSIONS
This study reveals that China’s basic education reforms operate within a complex “implementation ecosystem,”
where ambitious, centrally directed policies interact with persistent local-level challenges. Key initiatives, such
as the 20102020 National Plan for Education and the 2035 Education Modernization initiative, aim to
enhance quality, equity, and modernization nationwide. However, the study identifies an “implementation
paradox”: the more comprehensive and sophisticated the policy, the greater the likelihood of encountering
barriers during implementation. These barriers stem from variations in local contexts, including differences in
resources, teacher capacity, administrative expertise, and socio-economic conditions. As a result, even well-
designed national policies may produce uneven outcomes, requiring local adaptation and interpretation. This
tension highlights that policy implementation is not linear but a negotiation between national ambitions and
local realities. Addressing these challenges necessitates context-sensitive strategies, capacity-building, and
flexible support to ensure reforms achieve their intended impact across diverse regions. To make sense of this
paradox, our findings identify three majors, interlocking challenges within the ecosystem:
Evaluation Gravity
Despite the progressive aims of China’s recent education policies and curriculum reforms, which emphasize
twenty-first-century competencies, critical thinking, and holistic student development most notably articulated
in the Compulsory Education Curriculum Standards (2022 edition) classroom practices continue to be heavily
shaped by high-stakes examinations. This phenomenon, often referred to as evaluation gravity,” reflects the
strong pull of national exams, particularly the gaokao, on teaching and learning priorities. Even when curricula
promote inquiry-based learning, creativity, and broader skill development, teachers and students are compelled
to prioritize exam preparation to secure academic advancement and social mobility. Consequently, pedagogical
innovations and reform ideals are frequently subordinated to test-oriented objectives. This tension between the
aspirational goals of policy and the practical demands of the evaluation system exemplifies a persistent
challenge in China’s education reforms. Addressing evaluation gravity requires systemic adjustments to
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1529
www.rsisinternational.org
assessment practices, balancing the need for accountability with the promotion of holistic competencies and
authentic learning experiences.
Institutional Inequality and Efficiency-Equity Trade-offs
China’s education reforms have sought to balance standardization and decentralization, for instance by
delegating significant implementation responsibilities to county-level governance structures. These measures
have contributed to notable progress in reducing broad regional disparities in educational access and quality.
However, persistent institutional inequalities particularly in resources, infrastructure, and staffing continue to
create significant challenges, with rural and under-resourced areas disproportionately affected compared to
urban centers. Policies such as school consolidation illustrate the classic efficiency-equity trade-off inherent in
reform efforts. Consolidation can enhance efficiency by optimizing resource use, improving school
management, and expanding access to better facilities. Yet, without adequate support mechanisms for local
contexts, these policies may inadvertently exacerbate inequities, for example by increasing travel distances for
students, reducing local school autonomy, or concentrating advantages in already better-resourced areas. This
tension underscores that achieving both efficiency and equity in educational reform requires careful policy
design, context-sensitive implementation, and sustained local support to mitigate unintended consequences.
Policy Friction and Misaligned Goals
China’s education reforms often encounter significant “policy friction,” arising when universal, centrally
mandated policies interact with diverse local traditions, institutional norms, and practical constraints. For
instance, hukou-based residency regulations continue to restrict the access of migrant children to local schools,
limiting the reach of national education policies and perpetuating inequities. Similarly, digital education
initiatives face uneven adoption, particularly in rural or under-resourced regions where infrastructure is
inadequate and teachers lack sufficient training or technological readiness. Standardized teacher evaluation and
rotation programs demonstrate positive outcomes only when they resonate with local motivations, professional
norms, and existing school cultures, highlighting the importance of contextual alignment. Even widely
publicized policies targeting private tutoring, such as the Double Reduction policy, reveal the challenges of
top-down reform in the face of entrenched societal expectations and parental pressures. These examples
underscore that effective policy implementation requires careful negotiation between national objectives and
local realities, with flexibility, support, and adaptation to reduce misalignment and unintended consequences.
CONCLUSION
China’s basic education reforms over the past decade have made significant strides in expanding access,
raising quality, and modernizing the system for millions of students and teachers, largely through strategic
policy frameworks, central steering, targeted financing, and ongoing curriculum and technology initiatives.
Nonetheless, this study reveals that the success of such reforms is shaped by a complex “implementation
ecosystem” where national ambitions meet diverse and uneven local realities. The “implementation paradox”
that greater policy sophistication often encounters more significant barriers remains persistent: deep-rooted
exam pressures, institutional inequalities, misaligned stakeholder goals, and friction between central directives
and community needs continue to challenge the realization of reform objectives. Progress in equity financing
and county-level governance has narrowed provincial gaps but left lingering disparities within counties,
requiring more tailored and sustained local support. Teacher workforce improvements, curriculum
modernization, and digitalization efforts signal forward movement, yet their impact is unevenly felt:
technology and training are distributed inequitably, educational resources remain strained in rural and minority
areas, and new pedagogical approaches struggle under traditional exam-oriented expectations. Meanwhile, the
changing landscape created by the Double Reduction policy, demographic shifts, and inclusion challenges
especially for migrant and left-behind children underscore how system adaptation must be ongoing and
context-responsive.
Addressing these complex challenges demands not just further policy innovation but a renewed commitment to
adaptive implementation and genuine equity. For reforms to achieve their potential, stakeholders must align
curriculum, assessment, and teacher support, transition towards holistic, competency-based evaluation, and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1530
www.rsisinternational.org
ensure technology access is coupled with robust professional development. Resource allocation models and
support systems should be refined to reflect community needs within counties, not just between them, and
governance reforms must link education financing directly to actual enrollment, including migrant children a
step essential for inclusivity and long-term quality. Above all, capacity building, accountability, and flexible
adaptation must be at the core of future efforts, balancing central guidance with local agency and ensuring that
reforms are lived out in classrooms, not just designed in policy documents. By learning from these experiences
and targeting persistent gaps, China can continue to steer its education system towards greater fairness,
effectiveness, and resilience for a changing society.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To make China’s basic education reforms more effective, policymakers should focus on actionable strategies
that bridge national policy with local realities. First, capacity building at the local level should be guided by
clear, measurable targets such as increasing the percentage of teachers who receive annual professional
training, establishing digital learning coordinators in every county, and regularly reporting progress on teacher-
student ratios and technology access. Incentivizing districts that meet or exceed these benchmarks through
results-based rewards can drive improvement. Reforms should also be more culturally and regionally
responsive by providing targeted, data-driven support for rural and minority communities. This involves
distributing resources using funding formulas that account for local disadvantages, prioritizing equity in both
teacher allocation and infrastructure, and ensuring that curriculum updates, assessment changes, and teacher
development programs are implemented in a tightly aligned, integrated manner. Shifting the focus of
assessments from rote knowledge to deeper thinking skills by introducing and tracking participation in project-
based evaluations will encourage more creative and meaningful teaching practices. Digitalization efforts must
be supported with sufficient training and resources, with progress measured by technology readiness indexes
and student device access, to ensure equitable uptake across all regions.
To address longstanding inclusion and demographic challenges, the government should accelerate hukou
reform and update educational funding mechanisms so that financing directly follows students, including
migrants, wherever they enroll. This will require new governance accountability, ensuring localities that
receive these funds are held to high standards for transparency and reporting. At the same time, greater
investment in early childhood education with a national enrollment target for quality public preschools can
help close foundational gaps. Finally, adaptive planning using real-time demographic and resource data will
enable more efficient, need-based allocation of educational support amidst ongoing social changes. By
implementing these linked and measurable recommendations, China’s education reforms will be better
positioned to not only meet ambitious national targets, but also deliver genuine, equitable improvements in
local classroom experiences and outcomes.
REFERENCES
1. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature
review (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
3. Chen, S. (2023). Children left behind: An implementation analysis of migrant children’s education
reform inChina. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, *19*, 152
160. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/19/20231413
4. Cheng, Y. (2020). Educational reforms in China: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Educational
Policy, 35(2), 123145.
5. CPC Central Committee & State Council. (2019, February 23). China issues plan to modernize education
by 2035 [Policy document]. Xinhua/State Council.
6. CPC General Office & State Council General Office. (2021, July 24). Opinions on further reducing the
homework burden and off-campus training burden of students in compulsory education (Double
Reduction”) [Policy document].
7. Ding, X., & Wu, Y. (2024). [Context: Informal tutoring networks post-Double Reduction]. [Source:
User-provided context; publication details incomplete].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1531
www.rsisinternational.org
8. Financial Times. (2025, July 25). Chinese kindergartens in crisis as enrolments plunge 25% in 4 years.
9. Guo, S., Sun, T., Gong, J., Lu, Z., Zhang, L., & Wang, Q. (2022). Remote co-teaching in rural classroom:
Current practices, impacts, and challenges.
10. Hannum, E., & Wang, F. (2022). Fewer, better pathways for all? Intersectional impacts of rural school
consolidation in China’s minority regions. World Development.
11. Human Rights Watch. (2013, July 16). As long as they let us stay in class [Report on disabled pupils].
12. Li, J., & Li, K. (2023). Examining the challenges and strategies of student learning burden reduction
policy implementation. Beijing International Review of Education, 5(3).
13. Liao, W. (2017). Understanding an emerging “failure” of an equality-oriented teacher policy: Free
Teacher Education. International Journal of Educational Development.First published: 13 August 2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.8
14. Lin, T., Chen, J., & Zhang, H. (2024). [Context: ICT effectiveness and teacher roles]. ACM Digital
Library.
15. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022, May 7). MOE releases compulsory
education curriculum program and standards (2022 edition) [Press release].
16. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Statistical report on China’s
educational achievements in 2021 [Report].
17. OECD. (2023). Education Policy Outlook 2023. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-policy-
outlook-2023_f5063653-en.html
18. OECD (2020), Benchmarking the Performance of China's Education System10.1787/4ab33702-en.
19. Qin, Z. (2024). “Reflections on educational reform supporting build China into a world leader in science
and technology.”
20. Springer. (2020). The transformation of government responsibility and the development of educational
policies for early childhood education reform in China. In Early childhood education in China.
21. State Council Leading Group for Education Evaluation Reform. (2020). Overall plan for deepening the
reform of education evaluation in the new era [Policy document]. SCIRP.
22. UNESCO. (2023). Mid-term progress review of SDG 4 Education 2030 in East Asia:
China. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/mid-term-progress-review-sdg-4-education-2030-east-asia-
china
23. UNESCO (2023). “China: National Plan for Medium- and Long-Term Education Reform and
Development: 2020, issued 2010.”
24. UNICEF China. (2024). [Report on left-behind children and policy responses].
25. Wikipedia. (2025). Double Reduction Policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Reduction_Policy
26. Wikipedia. (2025). Education inequality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_inequality_in_China
World Bank. (2023).
27. Education Finance Watch 2023. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/5e673a53-
383e-4436-a49a-35098afcd303
28. Yang, B. (2024). County performance evaluation study: Reports national shares of counties attaining
balanced development by 2020. ScienceDirect.
29. Zhou, B. (2019). From scale to quality: Experiences and challenges in teacher education in
China. ECNU Review of Education.