INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1532
www.rsisinternational.org
Middle Management's Strategic Importance in Driving Digital
Transformation: A Literature Review
Afef Ben Delhouma Sghairi*
Doctor, Higher Institute of Management of Tunis, ARBRE Laboratory, TUNIS University
*Corresponding author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100122
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 02 December 2025
ABSTRACT
Digital transformation reshapes organizational processes and working methods, necessitating the active
involvement of middle management to drive successful change. This literature review explores the evolving
role of middle managers in digital transformation. This study examines the concept of digital leadership and
the strategic importance of middle managers in the effective implementation of digital initiatives. This review
reveals that beyond their traditional roles as mediators and translators of strategy, middle managers are
increasingly expected to act as change agents, digital facilitators, and innovation promoters. However, this
transition requires new digital, relational and adaptive competencies. The findings highlight the need for
continuous upskilling and reconfiguration of middle management responsibilities to align with agile and
technology-driven organizational models. Drawing on the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory, this
review emphasizes the importance of high-quality relationships between middle managers and their teams in
fostering communication, innovation, and a culture conducive to digitalization. This study underscores the
necessity of developing targeted training and leadership programs to enhance middle managers' digital literacy
and change their management capabilities. Organizations should foster a supportive environment that
empowers middle managers to experiment, innovate, and act as key transformation enablers. This review
contributes to the growing body of research on digital transformation by emphasizing the central, yet
underexplored role of middle management, offering a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge, and
identifying the emerging competencies required for middle managers to successfully navigate the digital age.
Keywords: Digital transformation middle management digital leadership agility skills - organizational
change
INTRODUCTION
The expansion of artificial intelligence tools, robotics, the Internet of Things, and various other technologies
has led to the emergence of Industry 4.0 (Volberda et al., 2021), generating a digital transformation. This
profound transformation has reshaped organizational and professional environments and even the entire world
(Peña and Caruajulca, 2022). Digital transformation, which modifies organizational processes through task
automation, has brought about radical changes in working methods (Peña and Caruajulca, 2022). A significant
change is being observed (Volberda et al., 2021), impacts the organization’s structure, technology, culture, and
organizational behavior (Tortorella et al., 2023). However, the outcomes of the digital transformation are not
guaranteed to be positive. An organization’s commitment to this process of radical change can lead to success,
but this is not guaranteed. Consequently, organizations must pay particular attention to the factors that ensure
the success of digital transformation, notably human capital. Securing the buy-in and involvement of all staff at
every level (Bagrationi and Thurner, 2023) is crucial for ensuring the successful completion of this long and
uncertain process. This includes employees and executives, but above all, middle management, which is
considered a strong link within the organization (Putra et al., 2023). Therefore, this category of employees
receives special attention (Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023). Management science research on middle management
has focused on its role in various types of change (Wooldridge et al., 2008). However, digital transformation
projects have not yet received the attention they deserve (Christodoulou et al. 2022). Existing studies have
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1533
www.rsisinternational.org
addressed the importance of middle management in the development of digital transformation projects but not
the assessment of their actual involvement (Jaoua, 2018) through the different roles played by this central
category of managers.
It is well established that middle managers play crucial roles within an organization under normal
circumstances
because of the centrality of their positions. However, digitalization has changed the behavior of work teams
(Park, 2021). As agents of change, middle managers are compelled to adapt their behaviors (Koponen et al.,
2023) to respond better to these developments. This prompts us to consider the new roles and skills these
managers must acquire to meet the demands of digital transformation by posing the following research
question: What roles do middle managers play in ensuring the success of the digital transformation process?
This study explores the involvement of middle management in formulating and implementing strategies in
digital transformation projects. It also assesses the importance of middle managers’ roles and strategic
activities in ensuring the successful implementation of digital transformation (Christodoulou et al., 2022).
LITERATURE REVIEW
Digital Transformation
The COVID-19 crisis forced organizations to rethink their ways of operating and adopting digital work models
(Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023) to reduce the risk of contamination. Owing to remote work and tools, such as
Meet, Zoom, virtual classrooms, and e-learning (Azzam et al., 2021), it has become possible to minimize these
risks while protecting the health and safety of millions. Consequently, the global pandemic has compelled the
professional world to revise its traditional operational and communication methods and to urgently integrate
information technologies into new economic models (Wu et al., 2021). In healthcare, transportation, banking,
insurance, retail, energy, agriculture (Varbanova et al., 2023), and education, digital transformation has led to
the adoption of new technologies that have improved the quality of services to meet citizens' needs. The
integration of these digital technologies has not only influenced organizational behavior, but has also
transformed organizational culture (Nadkarni and Prügl, 2021), encouraging organizations to challenge the
status quo and view change as a constant in their operations and evolution (Peña and Caruajulca, 2022).
Digital transformation refers to profound changes brought about by the adoption of technologies, such as
artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, cloud computing, big data and social networks (Volberda et al.,
2021). This transformation impacts organizations, societies, and even governments, forcing them to adapt
quickly to radical upheavals (Park, 2021). Digital transformation modifies processes by automating them
through the adoption of artificial intelligence and software that facilitate professional activities. Furthermore,
integrating digital tools enhances the organization’s internal and external communication, thereby
strengthening collaboration among employees and enriching customer experience, as demonstrated by mobile
applications and data analysis used to anticipate trends. Therefore, organizations are compelled to innovate and
develop solutions that enable them to remain at the forefront of this radical change through digital
transformation. An organizational culture that is open to change and adaptable is essential for successfully
carrying out digital transformation, minimizing resistance to change, and taking advantage of the various
opportunities offered by digital tools. Therefore, digital transformation is not simply the adoption of new
technology. It must be accompanied by a deeper process of change that affects culture (Nadkarni and Prügl,
2021), structure, tasks, personnel, and business models (Wu et al., 2021). This ongoing process, which
reinforces the digitalization of the organization (Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023), leads to several consequences
such as faster transactions, greater agility in actions, increased adaptability to new requirements, higher
employee productivity, and greater overall staff satisfaction (Peña and Caruajulca, 2022). There is even a
change in organizational structures and strategies in response to digital transformation (Van Doorn et al.,
2023), as well as better adaptability to evolving market conditions. In short, digital transformation can lead to
greater innovation, strong performance, and better outcomes for an entity (Khatib and Alshawabkeh, 2022).
However, the failure of the digital transformation process can lead to numerous repercussions for
organizations. Beyond financial losses and the costs associated with purchasing software and technologies, as
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1534
www.rsisinternational.org
well as the necessary training and adjustments, several difficulties may arise (Khan and Uddin, 2023). These
include the learning curve, handling of new tools, and adoption of new behaviors in response to technology.
Resistant behaviors may emerge as a reaction to the frequency and intensity of required changes (Bagrationi
and Thurner, 2023). Moreover, certain privacy issues may threaten an organization's leadership and pose a real
risk to the adoption of these technologies. Thus, although digital transformation benefits organizations and
their staff (Korsen and Ingvaldsen, 2022), it can also have several drawbacks for employees. Therefore, leaders
must be actively involved in ensuring the success of their organizations’ digital transformation (Li and Fei,
2023). One possible solution is to encourage staff buy-ins for digital transformation to carry out this uncertain
and challenging process (Mazurchenko et al., 2022). A change in organizational culture toward openness and
acceptance of radical change (Nadkarni and Prügl, 2021) may be the key to successful digital transformation
(Tortorella et al., 2023). Furthermore, the manner in which organizational leaders respond to this change
determines the success of the process. Among these leaders, middle managers (Xanthopoulou et al., 2023) play
a central role in the success of digitalization in the hotel industry. These true change agents can lead to
complex and uncertain processes (Van Doorn et al., 2023).
Digital transformation is a dynamic process. An organization’s commitment to this process does not guarantee
success. However, to succeed, it is essential that all staff embrace this radical change and actively participate in
every stage to ensure the integration of digital technologies into all organizational processes. This is
particularly true for middle management, who are genuine agents of change and act as vital links capable of
driving significant transformations within the organization. However, who are the middle managers? What role
do they play in the digital transformation process?
Middle Management
Several studies in the management sciences have examined the role of middle managers as key elements in
organizations. Middle managers serve as a link between top management and operational staff (Gaha, 2010).
This “pivotposition between leaders and employees enables the middle manager to be close to operational
realities on the one hand and strategic decisions on the other. As such, they are informed of the details of how
various tasks are carried out as well as feedback regarding employees, markets, and clients. Challenges and
malfunctions are quickly detected by middle managers, who strive to offer solutions. Simultaneously, middle
managers have access to information on strategic decisions and the future direction of the organization. This
places them at the heart of the organizational structure, ensuring coordination and communication between
management and employees (Besson and Mahieu, 2008). The centrality of the middle manager’s position
legitimizes their efforts to bridge the gap between strategic and operational levels. As intermediary agents
between the top and base of the hierarchy, they seek to contribute to strategic decisions by making them more
realistic while considering operational realities. Simultaneously, middle management ensures the
implementation of strategic decisions issued by the top management. Using this logic, Gaha (2003) asserts that
“middle managers constitute the backbone of a company. They are accountable for the success or failure of
executing the plan, managing, and supporting exchanges.”
In summary, middle managers work with senior executives to participate in strategic decision making while
cooperating with operational staff to facilitate the implementation of these strategies and relay information
related to their implementation (Do Vale et al., 2021). This challenge requires a strong commitment from
middle managers to overcome resistance to change and foster changes in employees’ attitudes and behaviors
(Putra et al., 2023). Thus, it can be considered that the roles assumed by middle managers are complex, as they
must simultaneously meet the demands of both senior management and operational staff. Expectations are
high, and responsibilities are considerable. Middle managers must possess the strong skills to assume these
responsibilities in the face of current demands. Consequently, middle managers represent a true “talent pool for
the organization(Gaha, 2006), and should benefit from the attention and support of top management. They
play a crucial role in the present and are generally prepared to assume leadership roles in future. Therefore,
they deserve particular attention from organizations and senior managers (Koponen et al., 2023).
In addition to the hierarchical position of middle managers, numerous researchers have examined their roles.
The focus is on efforts to coordinate the daily reality of operational staff and strategic activities of top
management (Floyd and Wooldridge, 1994; Nonaka, 1994; Balogun, 2003). The centrality of middle
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1535
www.rsisinternational.org
managers positions highlights the importance of their role within an organization. The synthesis work carried
out as part of this research enabled us to group the various roles of middle management into an initial
communicative role, where this central actor shares information, coordinates, and negotiates to bring
perspectives closer together and foster synergies around organizational projects. Their second role concerns the
task of a strategist, a true agent of change, who is capable of making decisions and actively contributing to the
strategic direction of the organization.
A strategic player …
The technical and scientific knowledge acquired by middle managers through their education, combined with
the interpersonal and communication skills developed through their professional experience, provides this
central figure with the necessary expertise to become a competent strategist to make appropriate decisions at
the right time. The middle manager thus transforms into an “ordinary strategist(Besson and Mahieu, 2008),
capable of detecting and understanding information coming from the market and making decisions
accordingly. Over time, middle managers learn to identify crucial information, understand the decision-making
process, and determine the organizationstrategic direction. Proximity to senior management facilitates the
integration of middle managers into the decision-making process and the strategic aspects of their roles
(Mercuri, 2013). Consequently, middle managersinvolvement in strategic decisions has a positive impact on
performance, both at the level of their teams or departments and on the results of the entire entity (Van Doorn
et al., 2023). Moreover, the dual proximity of middle managers to both senior management and operational
staff provides them with a deep understanding of how an entity functions. This enables them to grasp the
behaviors of the various people around them (Putra et al., 2023). This understanding allows them to identify
each individual’s strengths and areas of improvement and provides them with the techniques required to
initiate change. This phenomenon illustrates the role of middle managers in leading change (Balogun, 2003).
Endowed with communication skills
Middle managers occupy a strategic position between senior management and other organizational hierarchies
(Putra et al., 2023). This position gives them proximity to both the hierarchy and operational staff. Thus,
middle managers are informed of strategic decisions, which are generally centralized at the management level,
and become responsible for disseminating this information to employees (Balogun and Johnson, 2004;
Wooldridge and Floyd, 1990). However, information sharing is not one-sided, as this key actor also gathers
feedback from operational staff and coordinates best practices to adopt. Information exchange requires
advanced interpersonal and communication skills to negotiate with team members, manage conflicts, foster
synergies, and gain support from the entire team. Furthermore, the proximity of middle managers to
operational staff gives them an advantage in terms of receiving feedback on the market reality. The
information gathered allows for reassessment and, if necessary, realignment of strategic decisions. Thus, by
occupying a central position within the organizational structure, the middle manager acts as a transmitter of
both strategic and operational information. Strategic information originating from management is shared with
employees (downward communication) (Do Vale et al. 2021). Practical and operational information is relayed
from employees to managers (upward communication) (Wooldridge and Floyd, 1990; Huy, 2002; Balogun and
Johnson, 2004).
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
To explore the roles of middle management in the face of digital transformation, we chose the “leader-member
exchange (LMX) theory. This theory, developed from the pioneering work of Graen and Uhl-Bien (1991), is
based on the quality of exchanges between the leader and team members. The specificity and uniqueness of
each human relationship between a leader and their collaborator is generally built on trust and mutual respect.
However, the quality and strength of these relationships and the resulting exchanges influence motivation and
performance. Consequently, leaders are interested in understanding the quality of their relationships and
exchanges with each member of their team. Negotiating differences, strengthening agreements, and uniting
synergies around the team’s objectives only to consolidate the teams work around organizational goals.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1536
www.rsisinternational.org
This theoretical framework is relevant because middle managers must establish high-quality relationships with
all members of their team, particularly with the organization, in general. Due to the centrality of their position
within the organization, this manager must truly be a leader in taking on the various roles assigned to them.
Positioned between an organization’s leadership and its operational staff, middle managers benefit from
maintaining fair and high-quality relationships with all their counterparts to ensure genuine involvement in
organizational goals. By fostering a culture of trust and kindness, middle managers can acknowledge the
efforts of their team members and improve their work environment (Van Dam et al., 2021). Thus, they actively
contribute to facilitating collective performance, especially when they can identify the talent of their team
members and provide them with access to training and skill development opportunities. Thus, through the
leader member exchange theory, it becomes clear that by maintaining high-quality relationships with their
employees, middle managers can promote communication, encourage innovation, and cultivate a culture
conducive to digitalization and collaboration (Fein and Tziner, 2021). Therefore, it is legitimate to discuss the
leadership of these actors as a key factor in their success in their new roles. This individualized leadership,
based on the specific nature of the relationship between the middle manager and each employee, helps
highlight and recognize their skills. Furthermore, identifying their needs allows them to be addressed as
required with specific solutions, such as training, coaching, or mentoring, particularly in the context of digital
transformation (Hwang et al., 2021).
DISCUSSION
Digital transformation brings about a significant change in how organizations operate as well as employee
behavior (Benitez et al., 2022; Zulu, 2023). Middle managers are assigned new roles to meet the demands of
digitalization (Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023). Owing to their central position within the organization, these
managers perform several roles simultaneously. However, digital transformation imposes new constraints on
organizational and professional contexts (Khatib and Alshawabkeh, 2022). Therefore, in addition to the roles
traditionally assumed by middle management, digitalization requires this group of employees to acquire new
skills to better meet current demands, which are characterized by unpredictability, accelerated changes, and
integration of new technologies at all levels (Koponen et al., 2023). Moreover, middle managers have unique
personalities, distinct educational backgrounds, and professional experiences that shape their current identities.
Thus, each manager has a leadership style that distinguishes them from the others and contributes to their
uniqueness as leaders. Therefore, leadership styles vary depending on the individual, culture, and the
environment. Although there is no consensus on changes in leadership roles within the context of digital
transformation (El Sawy et al., 2016), it is possible to consider what unites middle managers operating in such
a context is their digital leadership, which represents a genuine challenge for this category of managers and for
the organization as a whole (Putra et al., 2023).
Agility skills
In the context of digital transformation, organizations require competent middle managers to guide them
toward achieving their goals (Do Vale et al., 2021). During the digitalization process, managers must acquire
new skills to adapt to unprecedented situations, demanding increased agility and adaptability compared to the
past (Park, 2021). Consequently, they are required to address emerging issues related to the digitalization
process and manage new work team configurations (Koponen et al., 2023). Thus, middle managers develop
various skills that enable them to quickly find solutions to problems encountered (Bagrationi and Thurner,
2023). For example, middle managersagility is an essential skill in digital transformation (Khan and Uddin,
2023). Agility is demonstrated by the ability to respond promptly to various unforeseen internal and external
events. This may include allocating new resources (Pradeep et al., 2021), revising the current strategy, or
increasing the focus on specific organizational goals (Peña and Caruajulca, 2022). It is crucial to understand
the implications and limitations of new technologies to maximize their benefits to the organization as a whole.
Furthermore, digital leaders must demonstrate enthusiasm and vision regarding digitalization (Henderikx and
Stoffers, 2023). In other words, they must be able to anticipate the concrete outcomes of this process and
understand its future directions (Park, 2021). They must also surround themselves with talented colleagues
who share the same interests in technological advances and applications (Klein, 2020).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1537
www.rsisinternational.org
Digital leadership
Early studies on leadership were primarily associated with the notion of commanding and controlling
employee performance.” Subsequently, the concept of leadership evolved to include dimensions such as
change, relationships, communication, coaching, advising, learning, growth, awakening, and development (Wu
et al., 2021), in response to transformations in the professional context. The term “leadershiphas come to
refer to the adoption of certain behaviors by individuals occupying leadership roles within an organization,
such as middle managers. These leaders are tasked with managing practices and guiding the staff. According to
Christodoulou et al. (2022), leadership is defined as a manager’s ability to ensure the viability of an
organization. At this stage, the question arises as to what the concept of digital leadership means. How can this
contribute to the digital transformation? In what ways does digitalization influence leadership? Klein (2020)
conceptualized digital leadership as encompassing behaviors that enable managers to drive digital
transformation or manage the organization in a digitalized environment, taking into account the organization’s
level of digital maturity. This type of leadership plays a crucial role in formulating and executing the most
appropriate strategy for an organization during digitalization (Christodoulou et al., 2022). Digital leadership
involves the use of an organization’s digital resources to achieve both organizational and individual objectives
(Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023). This is particularly relevant in dynamic contexts characterized by a high degree of
ambiguity (Luu, 2023). This form of leadership fosters creativity and innovation within the organization,
making work teams more effective and enabling them to achieve organizational objectives (Li and Fei, 2023),
while also meeting the demands of digitalization. The focus is on changing working methods and encouraging
collaboration and complementarity among teams. Digital leadership calls for new ways of working involving
high-performance teams (Klein, 2020).
Kane et al. (2019) defined digital leadership as the fusion of traditional leadership with new skills, enabling
leaders to address the challenges posed by digital transformation. These challenges include cultural changes
and increased expectations of productivity. Benitez et al. (2022) consider that digital leadership encompasses a
set of managerial, digital, and strategic skills that are essential for leading and managing interdisciplinary
teams to successfully achieve an organization’s digital transformation (Luu, 2023). Furthermore, Sagbas and
Erdogan (2022) associated digital leadership with a leadership style focused on implementing digital
transformation within an organization. Due to its complexity, digital transformation requires the involvement
of a true digital leader to facilitate this transition (Klein, 2020). Based on these definitions, middle managers
operating in the context of digital transformation can no longer be content with their traditional roles they
previously held (Xanthopoulou et al., 2023). They must acquire new skills to fully assume their responsibilities
and actively contribute to the success of the organization’s digitalization (Henderikx and Stoffers, 2023).
Research has intensified the identification of the additional tasks assumed by middle managers (Figure 1).
These include holding employees accountable for a strategic vision (Van Doorn et al., 2023), leading a process
of digital integration related to IT infrastructure, business processes, and data (Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023),
actively seeking self-transformation to reshape the organization (Volberda et al., 2021), viewing failures as
learning opportunities, seeking new collaborations (Wu et al., 2021), inspiring employees, coaching them, and
strengthening networking and team building (Park, 2021). These new roles for middle managers require self-
questioning and deep personal development (Bagrationi and Thurner, 2023). By challenging old practices, it
becomes possible to adopt a critical perspective that allows for the acquisition of new skills to improve the
performance of middle managers and to become a better version of oneself (Henderikx and Stoffers, 2023).
Figure 1 : Middle managers’ roles during Digital Transformation
Source : Authors’ own work
Middle Managers' roles
Agility skills
Digital leadership
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1538
www.rsisinternational.org
In this context, digital skills are not limited to a simple technological change but involve a necessary mental
transformation to better adapt to the digitalization process while adding value (Mazurchenko et al., 2022). This
is reflected in digital intelligence, which refers to the ability to convert digital data into accurate knowledge
(Nadkarni and Prügl, 2021). It also includes the use of artificial intelligence and advanced technologies, as well
as the development of digital skills related to digital technologies and culture (Tortorella et al. 2023). Thus, it
is clear that digital transformation is more about managing the transition (Bagrationi and Thurner, 2023) than
the technical aspects of digitalization (Xanthopoulou et al., 2023). Therefore, leaders, managers, and
employees acquire the appropriate skills to integrate organizations with new digital technologies
(Mazurchenko et al., 2022). This can only be achieved through deep introspective work, enabling various team
members to be motivated to increase their confidence and enhance their digital intelligence (Do Vale et al.,
2021).
CONCLUSION
Middle managers are vital assets for organizations. Intermediaries between upper management and frontline
employees are at the heart of the actions and decisions crucial to the smooth running of operations (Peña and
Caruajulca, 2022). Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence tools into employees’ daily tasks has
transformed the way work teams operate (Park, 2021), particularly in the digital era. This has automatically
redefined the responsibilities of middle managers, who must now supervise, advise, and train their teams,
resulting in the evolution of the roles and responsibilities of middle management toward their teams (Park,
2021). Thus, middle managers are key players in the success of digital transformation, and ensure the
efficiency and sustainability of this radical change. They gain agility and resilience as catalysts for the
adaptation and implementation of digital strategies (Pradeep et al., 2021). Their ability to adapt to constant
technological, organizational, and marketing changes enables successful digitization (Xanthopoulou et al.,
2023). Agility refers to persevering in the face of difficulties and learning from mistakes; this is the resilience
that middle managers must demonstrate to succeed in their new roles (Van Doorn et al., 2023). Due to their
agility, middle managers can react quickly to market fluctuations, the emergence of new technologies, and
changes in consumer demand during the digital transformation process (Khan and Uddin, 2023). This group of
managers develops solid resilience, enabling them to inspire their teams to handle setbacks and bounce back
from failures (Pradeep et al., 2021). It is no longer just about successfully carrying out digital transformation.
Organizations can then excel when faced with the real challenge of digitalization, continuing to evolve and
acquire new competitive advantages (Wu et al., 2021). Thus, the support of agile middle managers, capable of
guiding teams toward a new mindset, is a key asset for organizations wishing to succeed in digital
transformation (Henderikx and Stoffers, 2023).
Research contributions
Through this research, we aim to expand the knowledge related to the concepts of digital transformation and
middle managers. Our objective is to reconsider the various roles of middle managers during the digital
transformation process, which requires skills beyond those traditionally possessed by strategic actors. Thus, we
invite reflection on the leadership of these intermediaries, the skills acquired, and the performance of this
category of managers in the context of digital transformation, which changes the organization at multiple
levels (Pradeep et al., 2021).
Research implications
This study clarifies that selecting and training middle managers according to the demands of digital
transformation is essential (Henderikx and Stoffers, 2023). Therefore, HR managers must choose future middle
managers who are capable of embracing digital transformation and readily engage in a process of profound
change, enabling them to bring the entire work team into this digitalization process (Wu et al., 2021).
Moreover, emphasizing the new roles that middle managers must assume in the digital age can help
organizations by providing avenues for reflection and encouraging them to see middle management as an ally,
a facilitator of digital transition (Xanthopoulou et al., 2023). Thus, they have become a central element in the
success of digital transformation (Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023). Specifically, this research allows business
leaders, researchers, trainers, educators, and human resource professionals to encourage middle managers by
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1539
www.rsisinternational.org
providing them with the advice, training, and learning necessary to become pillars of digital transformation
within their organizations (Wu et al., 2021). Digital transformation requires reassessment of traditional
management and leadership practices (Matyusz and Pistrui, 2023). This reassessment can only take place
through deep personal introspection to accept this major change, and must begin with the managers themselves
(Wu et al., 2021). Implementing support and development programs for middle managers to help them initiate
this personal work and better adapt to digital transformation is a true driver of progress for this group of
managers. Finally, organizations must take the necessary steps to provide middle managers with the time,
support, and assistance required to let go of old practices (Bagrationi and Thurner, 2023)and fully engage in a
reassessment that will allow them to excel in these new roles (Wu et al., 2021).
Limitations and future research directions
Similar to other studies, our study has certain limitations. This study reviews the literature on middle
management, digital transformation, and digital leadership. Although our research is purely theoretical, it can
serve as a foundation for future studies exploring the new roles of middle managers in the current Tunisian
context through systematic literature reviews. Certain areas of application or investigation can be specified,
such as the health sector, higher education, public administration (Xanthopoulou et al., 2023), and the financial
sector (Mazurchenko et al., 2022). Each of these fields has specific characteristics that enrich scientific
research on digital transformation and the role of middle management (Van Doorn et al., 2023). Future
research could also explore the sources of middle managers’ resistance or reluctance toward digital
transformation (Khan and Uddin, 2023). Indeed, within this category of managers, there is variation in
perceptions and behaviors concerning the adoption of digital transformation. Many studies have focused on the
resistance to this transformation (Bagrationi and Thurner, 2023; Khan and Uddin, 2023). This line of research
is particularly relevant in the Tunisian context, which is characterized by strong cultural resistance to change.
Exploring this avenue would be highly useful in helping leaders, HR managers, trainers, and consultants to
support this strategically important category of employees.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. There are no affiliations with or involvement
in any organization or entity with any financial interests in the subject matter or materials discussed in this
manuscript.
Author contributions: Afef Ben Delhouma Sghairi Contributed to the design, implementation, analysis, and
writing of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Azzam, M., Khalil, T., and Sami, N. (2021). World Of the Future … The New World Order Post Covid-
19. Proc. Int. Conf. Int. Assoc. Manag. Technol., IAMOT - MOT World Future, 22‑42. Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.52202/060557-0001
2. Bagrationi, K., and Thurner, T. (2023). Middle Management’s Resistance to Digital Change. Foresight
and STI Governance, 17(2), 49‑60. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.2.49.60
3. Bagrationi, K., Thurner, T. W., and Gordienko, O. (2021). Resistance to digital transformation and the
destruction of social capital. In Matos F., Ferreiro M.D.F., Salavisa I., and Rosa A. (Éds.), Proc. Eur.
Conf. Innov. Entrepren., ECIE (p. 47‑53). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited;
Scopus. https://doi.org/10.34190/EIE.21.230
4. Brunner, T. J. J., Schuster, T., and Lehmann, C. (2023). Leadership’s long arm: The positive influence
of digital leadership on managing technology-driven change over a strengthened service innovation
capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 988808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.988808
5. Christodoulou, I. P., Wasim, J., Reinhardt, R. J., and Ivanov, K. (2022). The strategic role of middle
managers in the formulation and implementation of digital transformation projects. Strategic Change,
31(6), 613‑622. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2528
6. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., and Zampieri, R. (2019). The Role of Leadership in a Digitalized World: A
Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
7. Denning, S. (2023). Recognizing and outmaneuvering the resistance to digital transformation. Strategy
and Leadership, 51(2), 10‑16. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-01-2023-0002
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1540
www.rsisinternational.org
8. Do Vale, G., Collin-Lachaud, I., and Lecocq, X. (2021). Micro-level practices of bricolage during
business model innovation process: The case of digital transformation towards omnichannel retailing.
Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101154
9. Elsan Mansaray, H. (2019). The Role of Leadership Style in Organizational Change Management: A
Literature Review. Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1), 18.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20190701.13
10. Fein, E. C., and Tziner, A. (2021). Editorial: The Future of the Leader-Member Exchange Theory.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 736710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736710
11. Gaha, C. (2006). Les cadres intermédiaires, leviers du changement radical. La Revue des Sciences de
Gestion, 220-221, 177-182. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsg.220.0177
12. Graen, G.B., and Uhl-Bien, M. (1991a). The transformation of professionals into self-managing and
partially self-designing contributions : Toward a theory of leader-making. Journal of Management
Systems, 3(3), 33-48.
13. Graen, G.B., and Uhl-Bien, M. (1991b). Partnership-making applies equally well to team mate-sponsor
teammate-competence network and teammate-teammate relationships. Journal of Management Systems,
3(3), 49-54.
14. Green, George B. and Uhl-Bien, Mary, "Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership : Development of
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-
Domain Perspective" (1995). Management Department Faculty Publications. 57.
15. Henderikx, M., and Stoffers, J. (2022). An Exploratory Literature Study into Digital Transformation and
Leadership: Toward Future-proof Middle Managers. Sustainability, 14(2), 687.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020687
16. Henderikx, M., and Stoffers, J. (2023a). Digital transformation and middle managers’ leadership skills
and behavior: A group concept mapping approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1147002
17. Hermkens, F., and L. Romme, A. G. (2020). The Role of Middle Management in Continuous
Improvement: The Bermuda Triangle of Leadership, Implementation and Behavioral Change. Journal
Of Management Policies and Practices, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15640/jmpp.v8n1a5
18. Hwang, Y., Kim, S., Rouibah, K., and Shin, D. (2021). The Moderating Effects of Leader-Member
Exchange for Technology Acceptance: An Empirical Study Within Organizations. Journal of
Organizational and End User Computing, 33(4), 1‑27. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.20210701.oa1
19. Jemine, G., and Pichault, F. (2023). Behind the scenes of strategy: Middle-management tactics for
shaping digital transformation. In Responding to Uncertain Cond.: New Res. On Strategy. Adapt. (p.
41‑63). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-964-220231003
20. Khan, M. A. I., and Uddin, M. A. (2023). Does managerial propensity towards digitalization enhance
firm performance? A case study of Indian MSMEs. International Journal of Applied Economics,
Finance and Accounting, 17(1), 168‑175. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v17i1.1093
21. Khatib, O., and Alshawabkeh, K. (2022). Digital Transformation and Its Impact on Strategic Supremacy
Mediating Role of Digital HRM: an Evidence from Palestine. WSEAS Transactions on Business and
Economics, 19, 197‑221. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.20
22. Klein, M. (2020). Leadership characteristics in the era of digital transformation. Business and
Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 883‑902. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1441
23. Koponen, J., Julkunen, S., Laajalahti, A., Turunen, M., and Spitzberg, B. (2023a). Work Characteristics
Needed by Middle Managers When Leading AI-Integrated Service Teams. Journal of Service Research.
Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231220462
24. Koponen, J., Julkunen, S., Laajalahti, A., Turunen, M., and Spitzberg, B. (2023b). Work Characteristics
Needed by Middle Managers When Leading AI-Integrated Service Teams. Journal of Service Research,
10946705231220462. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231220462
25. Korsen, E. B. H., and Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2022). Digitalization and the performance measurement and
management system: Reinforcing empowerment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Management, 71(4), 1059‑1075. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2020-0488
26. Lang, L. D., Behl, A., Phuong, N. N. D., Gaur, J., and Dzung, N. T. (2023). Toward SME digital
transformation in the supply chain context: The role of structural social and human capital. International
Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 53(4), 448‑466. Scopus.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1541
www.rsisinternational.org
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2021-0525
27. Li, Y., and Fei, G. Z. (2023). Network embeddedness, digital transformation, and enterprise
performanceThe moderating effect of top managerial cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098974
28. Luu, T. D. (2023). Digital transformation and export performance: A process mechanism of firm digital
capabilities. Business Process Management Journal, 29(5), 1436‑1465. Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2023-0024
29. Matt, C., Hess, T., and Benlian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business and Information
Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339‑343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
30. Matyusz, Z., and Pistrui, B. (2023). How Can Digitalization Mitigate Pandemic-Induced Demand
Shocks? A Case Study from the Apparel Industry. Administrative Sciences, 13(12). Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120257
31. Mazurchenko, A., Zelenka, M., and Maršíková, K. (2022). Demand For Employees’ Digital Skills in
The Context of Banking 4.0. Ekonomie and Management, 25(2), 41‑58. Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2022-2-003
32. Mohd Salleh, N., Mohamed Shukry, S. N., and Jokinol, V. M. C. (2023). Analyzing the Challenges,
Effects, and Motivations of Gig Economy Workers. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), Pages 2125-2142. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17514
33. Nadkarni, S., and Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis, and opportunities for
future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233‑341. Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
34. Park, K. M. (2021). Navigating the digital revolution and crisis times: Humanitarian and innovation-
inspired leadership through the pandemic. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(3), 360‑377.
Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2021-0021
35. Peña, J., and Caruajulca, P. (2022). Industry 4.0 Evolutionary Framework: The Increasing Need to
Include the Human Factor. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 17(3), 70‑83. Scopus.
36. Pradeep, S., Khaleeli, M., and Jawabri, A. (2021). Digital transformation strategies of UAE enterprises:
A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(Special Issue 4),
1‑16. Scopus.
37. Putra, F. H. R., Pandza, K., and Khanagha, S. (2023). Strategic leadership in liminal space: Framing
exploration of digital opportunities at hierarchical interfaces. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.
Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1465
38. Saleem A, Dare PS and Sang G (2022) Leadership styles and the process of organizational change
during the pandemic. Front. Psychol. 13:920495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920495
39. Sironi, P. (2021). The True Value of AI to Transform Push/Pull Wealth Management Offers. In The AI
Book: The Artificial Intelligence Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries (p.
122‑124). Wiley; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119551966.ch33
40. Tarakci, M., Heyden, M. L. M., Rouleau, L., Raes, A., and Floyd, S. W. (2023). Heroes or Villains?
Recasting Middle Management Roles, Processes, and Behaviours. Journal of Management Studies,
60(7), 1663‑1683. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12989
41. Tortorella, G. L., Prashar, A., Carim Junior, G., Mostafa, S., Barros, A., Lima, R. M., and Hines, P.
(2023). Organizational culture and Industry 4.0 design principles: An empirical study on their
relationship. Production Planning and Control. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2170294
42. Van Doorn, S., Georgakakis, D., Oehmichen, J., and Reimer, M. (2023a). Opportunity or Threat?
Exploring Middle Manager Roles in the Face of Digital Transformation. Journal of Management
Studies, 60(7), 1684‑1719. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12880
43. Van Doorn, S., Georgakakis, D., Oehmichen, J., and Reimer, M. (2023b). Opportunity or Threat?
Exploring Middle Manager Roles in the Face of Digital Transformation. Journal of Management
Studies, 60(7), 1684‑1719. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12880
44. Van Dam, K., Verboon, P., and Tekleab, A. (2021). The Impact of Middle Managers on Employees
Responses to a Merger: An LMX and Appraisal Theory Approach. Journal of Change Management,
21(4), 432‑450. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888772
45. Varbanova, M., de Barcellosa, M. D., Kirova, M., De Steur, H., and Gellynck, X. (2023). Industry 4.0
Implementation Factors for Agri-Food and Manufacturing Smes in Central and Eastern Europe. Serbian
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1542
www.rsisinternational.org
Journal of Management, 18(1), 167‑179. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm18-39939
46. Volberda, H. W., Khanagha, S., Baden-Fuller, C., Mihalache, O. R., and Birkinshaw, J. (2021).
Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing
new organizational forms. Long Range Planning, 54(5). Scopus.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102110
47. Wu, T., Chen, B., Shao, Y., and Lu, H. (2021). Enable digital transformation: Entrepreneurial
leadership, ambidextrous learning, and organizational performance. Technology Analysis and Strategic
Management, 33(12), 1389‑1403. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1876220
48. Xanthopoulou, P., Antoniadis, I., and Triantari, S. (2023). Managing Public Sector in the Digital Reform
Era: Organizational Factors and Their Impact on the Digital Transformation at the Greek Public
Administration. In Tsounis N. and Vlachvei A. (Éds.), Springer Proc. Bus. Econ. (P. 947‑962). Springer
Nature ; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22749-3