INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Comparison of Euroflow and Conventional Flow Cytometry  
Protocols for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Pediatric B-Cell  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia  
Maldonado N, Katherine., Mamani C, William  
Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del sur IREN SUR  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 02 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the most frequent hematological malignancy in childhood, and its  
prognosis is strongly linked to the monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD). Flow cytometry (FC) is the  
gold standard for MRD detection, but methods vary widely between laboratories, often leading to discrepancies  
in sensitivity and reliability. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively compare two flow cytometry  
protocolsthe standardized EuroFlow method and a conventional, laboratory-developed protocolfor MRD  
detection in pediatric B-cell ALL patients. A total of 228 bone marrow samples from 76 pediatric patients at  
IREN SUR were analyzed. The results, benchmarked against an external reference (INSNSB protocol), showed  
that 35.5% of patients were MRD-positive, predominantly in the female and older pediatric (1115 years)  
subgroups. The EuroFlow protocol demonstrated a consistent 100% accuracy across all age and sex strata,  
whereas the conventional method showed diminished accuracy, falling to 83.3% in the female 1115 years  
group. Crucially, both protocols maintained 100% specificity (precision). Correlation analysis indicated perfect  
diagnostic concordance for EuroFlow (kappa=1.000) and superior quantitative correlation with the reference for  
normal B-lymphoblasts (R=0.9798). These findings conclusively establish EuroFlow as the more reliable and  
robust protocol for MRD detection in a clinical setting, recommending its adoption to standardize diagnostic  
practice and improve relapse prediction.  
Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, minimal residual disease, flow cytometry, EuroFlow,  
standardization.  
INTRODUCTION  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) remains the most prevalent cancer among children worldwide.  
Advancements in multi-agent chemotherapy have dramatically improved five-year survival rates, which now  
approach 90% in high-income countries. However, relapse continues to be the leading cause of treatment failure  
and mortality. The accurate and timely detection of residual leukemic cells, known as Minimal Residual Disease  
(MRD) or Measurable Residual Disease (MRD), is universally recognized as the single most critical prognostic  
factor in ALL management [7], [9]. MRD statustypically defined by a threshold of 0.01% or 10-4 leukemic  
cellsguides risk stratification and treatment intensity adjustments, particularly in post-induction and  
consolidation phases.  
Multiparametric Flow Cytometry (MFC) has become the preferred technique for MRD monitoring due to its  
high sensitivity (capable of detecting 10-4 to 10-5 cells), speed, and relatively low cost compared to molecular  
methods like PCR [11]. MFC allows for precise characterization of leukemic cells by simultaneously analyzing  
multiple antigenic markers to identify aberrant and immature cell populations. It relies on identifying Leukemia-  
Associated Immunophenotypes (LAIPs) or tracking the aberrant expression patterns of B-cell precursor antigens,  
such as CD10, CD19, CD34, and CD45, to discriminate between residual leukemic blasts and normal  
regenerating B-cell precursors [8].  
Despite its utility, a major challenge in MFC for MRD is the high variability in results across laboratories, often  
stemming from differences in antibody panels, sample preparation, compensation settings, and data analysis  
Page 1657  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
strategies [6]. To address this, the European consortium EuroFlow developed and validated highly standardized,  
robust, and reproducible protocols. The EuroFlow approach mandates the use of pre-mixed, highly optimized 8  
to 12 color antibody combinations, standardized instrument setup and quality control (using CS&T beads), and  
the "Bulklysis" technique for sample preparation, ensuring optimal cell recovery and reduced technical variation  
[10], [12].  
This study was designed to provide evidence-based validation for implementing standardized protocols in a  
regional oncopediatric center. Specifically, we conducted a head-to-head comparison of the standardized  
EuroFlow protocol against a conventionally used, non-standardized protocol for detecting MRD in pediatric B-  
cell ALL patients at IREN SUR, with the objective of determining which method provides superior efficiency  
in terms of accuracy and precision against an external reference laboratory standard (INSNSB protocol).  
METHODOLOGY  
Study Design and Population  
This investigation employed a comparative, cross-sectional design at an explanatory level, analyzing the  
performance metrics of two flow cytometry protocols. The study population consisted of pediatric patients (aged  
3 to 16 years) with confirmed B-cell ALL diagnosis undergoing post-treatment follow-up at the Instituto  
Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del Sur (IREN SUR), Arequipa, Peru.  
A total of 228 bone marrow samples were collected as duplicates from 76 patients during their routine check-  
ups between July 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria mandated a confirmed B-cell ALL diagnosis and the  
availability of fresh bone marrow aspirate. Exclusion criteria involved samples with inadequate cellularity or  
those processed more than 24 hours after extraction. The INSNSB protocol served as the external gold standard  
for diagnostic validation.  
Sample Processing and Flow Cytometry  
Bone marrow samples (56 mL) were collected in K3 EDTA tubes. All samples were subjected to routine quality  
control for cellular viability. One portion of the bone marrow aspirate was processed concurrently via both the  
conventional and EuroFlow protocols at IREN SUR, while the duplicate was sent to the reference laboratory  
(INSNSB). Samples were aliquoted, codified, and processed. The FACSCanto II flow cytometer was validated  
and prepared daily.  
1) EuroFlow Protocol:  
The standardized EuroFlow approach utilized an optimized 8 to 12 color panel targeting key B-cell lineage  
markers and LAIPs (e.g., CD10, CD19, CD34, CD38, CD45, CD20, CD81, CD66c/CD123, CD73/CD304). The  
crucial technical difference was the implementation of the Bulklysis technique. This method involves a bulk red  
blood cell lysis step followed by staining, which is known to significantly maximize the number of total events  
collected, improving the statistical power for detecting rare events. A stringent minimum of 1 x 106 events was  
acquired using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer. Data analysis was performed using the standardized EuroFlow  
gating strategy within Infinicyt software.  
2) Conventional Protocol:  
This protocol used a commercial antibody panel with markers similar to the EuroFlow panel. However, sample  
preparation relied on a traditional lysis and wash method, which often results in lower cell yields compared to  
Bulklysis. The minimum event acquisition target was lower, typically 5 x 105 events. Analysis was conducted  
manually using standard gating protocols, which are more susceptible to inter-operator variability.  
Statistical Analysis  
The primary outcome was the MRD status, dichotomized into Positive (0.01% leukemic cells) or Negative  
(<0.01% leukemic cells). Samples were stratified by age group (15, 610, and 1115 years) and sex.  
Page 1658  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Performance metrics were calculated using the INSNSB result as the true status:  
Accuracy: Measures the proportion of correct classifications (True Positives + True Negatives) relative to all  
cases:  
Exactitud=(VP+VN) /(VP+VN+FP+FN)  
Precision (Positive Predictive Value): Measures the probability that a positive test result is truly positive:  
Precision=(VP)/(VP+FP)  
Diagnostic Concordance: Assessed using Cohen’s Kappa (κ) coefficient.  
Quantitative Correlation: Assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (R).  
RESULTS  
Patient Demographics and MRD Prevalence  
Among the 76 pediatric patients, 27 were categorized as MRD-positive (0.01%), resulting in an overall  
prevalence of 35.5%. Positive cases were slightly higher in females (14 cases) than males (13 cases). The highest  
frequency of positive MRD was observed in the 6-10 years age group (14 cases) and the 11-15 years group (10  
cases).  
Quantitative Comparison of Protocols  
The mean percentages ( ̅X ± D.E.) of pathological and normal B-lymphoblasts were compared. While the  
EuroFlow protocol consistently yielded slightly higher mean values across all subgroups (Pathological: 28.77 ±  
37.54 vs. Conventional: 27.85 ± 36.46), statistical testing confirmed no statistically significant difference in the  
quantitative detection of blasts between the two protocols (p > 0.05).  
Accuracy and Precision Analysis  
The comparative performance against the INSNSB reference protocol showed critical differences in diagnostic  
accuracy:  
Protocol  
Overall Accuracy κ Index (Diagnostic Concordance)  
EuroFlow  
Conventional  
100%  
1.000 (Perfect)  
97.37%  
0.942 (Almost Perfect)  
The EuroFlow protocol achieved perfect accuracy (100%) across all age and sex subgroups, indicating zero false  
negatives (FN). In contrast, the conventional protocol's accuracy dropped in specific subgroups, notably to 90%  
in males aged 610 years and 83.3% in females aged 1115 years, due to the presence of false negatives. Both  
protocols demonstrated exceptional precision (100% Positive Predictive Value) across all subgroups.  
Correlation Coefficients  
The Pearson correlation coefficient (R) for the quantitative detection of B-lymphoblasts showed very high  
association for all comparisons (p<0.05). For Normal B-lymphoblasts, EuroFlow showed a superior correlation  
with the control (R=0.9798) compared to the conventional protocol (R=0.9460).  
Page 1659  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
DISCUSSION  
The primary finding of this study is the statistically and clinically significant superiority of the EuroFlow  
protocol in terms of diagnostic accuracy and concordance. Achieving a 100% accuracy and perfect Kappa  
agreement (kappa=1.000) with the gold standard reference protocol positions EuroFlow as the unequivocally  
reliable method for MRD detection in this cohort.  
The observed decline in the conventional protocol's accuracy in specific age and sex subgroups (e.g., 83.3% in  
females 11-15 years) is critical, as it indicates a propensity for generating false negative results. In ALL  
monitoring, a false negative result carries a high clinical risk, potentially leading to treatment errors and relapse.  
The technical advantages of EuroFlow, such as the Bulklysis technique and the standardized gating strategies,  
are likely responsible for its enhanced ability to reliably detect low-frequency MRD cells across all demographic  
variations.  
While the quantitative results showed no statistically significant difference in the percentage of blasts detected  
(p>0.05), the qualitative difference in diagnostic accuracy is paramount. The study validates the international  
push for standardization in flow cytometry. The adoption of the EuroFlow protocol can significantly minimize  
technical noise and maximize the clinical utility of MRD results, leading to improved, evidence-based clinical  
decision-making.  
CONCLUSIONS  
1. The overall prevalence of Minimal Residual Disease (0.01%) in the studied pediatric B-ALL cohort was  
35.5%, with a slight predominance in the female and older pediatric (1115 years) subgroups.  
2. Quantitatively, the EuroFlow and conventional protocols showed equivalent mean percentages of  
pathological B-lymphoblasts, but only EuroFlow achieved a statistically perfect diagnostic concordance.  
3. The EuroFlow protocol demonstrated 100% accuracy and 100% precision across all age and sex strata,  
confirming its superior reliability.  
4. The conventional protocol showed a notable decrease in accuracy (as low as 83.3%) due to false negative  
results, establishing EuroFlow as the technically superior and clinically more reliable protocol for MRD  
detection in the B-cell ALL population.  
REFERENCES  
1. Aronoff, S., (1989). Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective. Ottawa: WDL  
Publications.  
2. Álvarez-Zúñiga, C. D., Garza-Veloz, I., Martínez-Rendón, J., Ureño-Segura, M., Delgado-Enciso, I., &  
Martinez-Fierro, M. L. (2023). Circulating Biomarkers Associated with the Diagnosis and Prognosis of  
B-Cell  
Progenitor  
Acute  
Lymphoblastic  
Leukemia.  
Cancers,  
15(16),  
4186.  
3. Cossarizza, A., Chang, H. D., Radbruch, A., Acs, A., Adam, D., Adam-Klages, S., Agace, W. W.,  
Aghaeepour, N., Akdis, M., Allez, M., Almeida, L. N., Alvisi, G., Anderson, G., Andrä, I., Annunziato,  
F., Anselmo, A., Bacher, P., Baldari, C. T., Bari, S. Zychlinsky, A. (2019). Guidelines for the use of flow  
cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition). European Journal Of Immunology,  
4. De Smith, A. J., Jiménez-Morales, S., & Mejía-Aranguré, J. M. (2024). The genetic risk of acute  
lymphoblastic leukemia and its implications for children of Latin American origin. Frontiers In  
5. Ekpa, Q. L., Akahara, P. C., Anderson, A. M., Adekoya, O. O., Ajayi, O. O., Alabi, P. O., Okobi,, O. E.,  
Jaiyeola, O., & Ekanem, M. S. (2023). A Review of Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) in the Pediatric  
Population: Evaluating Current Trends and Changes in Guidelines in the Past Decade. Cureus, 15(12),  
Page 1660  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
6. Glier, H., Heijnen, I., Hauwel, M., Dirks, J., Quarroz, S., Lehmann, T., Rovo, A., Arn, K., Matthes, T.,  
Hogan, C., Keller, P., Dudkiewicz, E., Stüssi, G., & Fernandez, P. (2019). Standardization of 8-color  
flow cytometry across different flow cytometer instruments: A feasibility study in clinical laboratories  
in  
Switzerland.  
Journal  
Of  
Immunological  
Methods,  
475,  
112348.  
7. Juárez-Avendaño, G., Méndez-Ramírez, N., Luna-Silva, N. C., Gómez-Almaguer, D., Pelayo, R., &  
Balandrán, J. C. (2021). Molecular and cellular markers for measurable residual disease in acute  
lymphoblastic leukemia. Boletin médico del Hospital Infantil de México, 78(3), 159-170.  
8. Kruse, A., Abdel-Azim, N., Kim, H. N., Ruan, Y., Phan, V., Ogana, H., Wang, W., Lee, R., Gang, E. J.,  
Khazal, S., & Kim, Y. M. (2020). Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Lymphoblastic  
Leukemia.  
International  
journal  
of  
molecular  
sciences,  
21(3),  
1054.  
9. Pieters, R., Mullighan, C. G., & Hunger, S. P. (2023). Advancing Diagnostics and Therapy to Reach  
Universal Cure in Childhood ALL. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society  
10. Theunissen, P., Mejstrikova, E., Sedek, L., Van Der Sluijs-Gelling, A. J., Gaipa, G., Bartels, M., Da  
Costa, E. S., Kotrová, M., Novakova, M., Sonneveld, E., Buracchi, C., Bonaccorso, P., Oliveira, E.,  
Marvelde, J. G. T., Szczepanski, T., Lhermitte, L., Hrusak, O., Lecrevisse, Q., Grigore, G. E.,... Van Der  
Velden, V. H. J. (2016). Standardized flow cytometry for highly sensitive MRD measurements in B-cell  
11. Van Dongen, J. J. M., Van Der Velden, V. H. J., Brüggemann, M., & Orfao, A. (2015). Minimal residual  
disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized  
12. Verbeek, M. W. C., & van der Velden, V. H. J. (2024). The Evolving Landscape of Flowcytometric  
Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. International  
Page 1661