INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1825
www.rsisinternational.org
Analysis of Gold Zakat Implementation at Lembaga Zakat Selangor
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Azri Bin Bhari
1*
, Dr. Nik Airin Aqmar Binti Nik Azhar
2
, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mohd Ashrof
Zaki Bin Yaakob
3
, Dr. Mohd Faiz Mohamed Bin Yusof
4
, Dr. Mohd Yusra Bin Abdullah
5
, Mr.
Mohammad Mahyuddin Bin Khalid
6
, Dr. Nurulaina Saidin
7
, Intan Nurrachmi
8
, Nurulaneeyamirah
Razali
9
1,2.3.4.5.6,7
Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM),
Malaysia
8
Faculty of Sharia, Sharia Economic Law, Islamic University of Bandung
9
Lembaga Zakat Selangor (LZS), 40100 Shah Alam, Selangor
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100146
Received: 14 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 03 December 2025
ABSTRACT
Gold is a high-value asset that plays a crucial role in the economic system and wealth development of the Muslim
community. In addition to functioning as a medium of exchange and ornamentation, gold has increasingly
become a significant investment instrument through physical ownership such as bars and coins, as well as digital
gold investment accounts. The evolving functions of gold necessitate a reassessment of the understanding and
implementation of gold zakat to ensure conformity with fiqh principles and contemporary realities. This article
aims to analyse the concept of gold zakat based on the discussions of the four major mazhab (school of thought)
and contemporary scholars, and to examine the implementation and governance of gold zakat at Lembaga Zakat
Selangor (LZS) as a leading zakat institution in Malaysia. This study adopts a qualitative research design through
document analysis, specifically examining the Fatwa on Zakat Collection Management System (Amendment
2022) and operational data from LZS. The data were analysed using inductive and comparative approaches to
assess the consistency between Shariah principles and institutional implementation. The findings indicate that
LZS adheres to four fundamental collection principles: immediacy (fauriyyah), prevention of double taxation,
and the classification of gold as a growth asset (al-namā'). Furthermore, the study critically evaluates LZS's
approach to contemporary issues, specifically the taxation of the principal amount in non-Shariah-compliant
digital gold investments. Overall, LZS demonstrates its capacity to align Shariah obligations with modern
economic realities, thereby strengthening the zakat system as an instrument of social justice and sustainable
development of the Muslim ummah.
Keywords: gold zakat, gold investment, zakat implementation
INTRODUCTION
Gold is a precious metal that has long been regarded as a symbol of wealth and economic growth. Consequently,
gold is subject to zakat, just like other forms of wealth that possess the quality of productivity and value
appreciation. In Malaysia, gold constitutes one of the zakatable assets administered by various zakat institutions
to ensure that Muslims fulfil their religious obligation of paying zakat. The obligation to pay zakat on gold is
explicitly mentioned in both the Qur’an and the Hadith (Azri Bhari et al., 2019).
Allah Almighty declares:
And those who hoard up gold and silver and do not spend them in the way of Allah give them tidings of a
painful punishment.(Surah al-Tawbah 9:34)
Commenting on this verse, Ibn Qudāmah (2003) asserts that Allah would not threaten such punishment except
in cases where the payment of zakat has become obligatory but was neglected.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1826
www.rsisinternational.org
Furthermore, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
Whoever possesses gold or silver and does not pay its zakat, on the Day of Resurrection sheets of fire will be
prepared for him; these will be heated in the fire of Hell and used to brand his sides and back.” (Muslim, 2008)
In the context of Selangor, the legal framework is solidified by the Fatwa Sistem Pengurusan Kutipan Zakat
Negeri Selangor. This Fatwa reinforces the obligation based on Surah al-Tawbah (Verses 34 and 103) and
establishes that gold zakat is mandatory upon satisfying three conditions: meeting the minimum threshold
(nisab), complete ownership (milik sempurna), and the passing of a lunar year (haul).
According to al-Nawawī (1983), this hadith clearly establishes the unanimous ruling (ijmāʿ) among jurists that
zakat on gold and silver is obligatory. Ibn Qudāmah (2003) likewise affirms that this obligation has been accepted
by consensus (ijmāʿ al-fuqahāʾ) among classical scholars of Islamic jurisprudence.
Discussion on the Nisab of Gold Zakat
Muslim jurists (fuqahāʾ) hold differing views regarding the nisab (threshold) for zakat on gold, as there are no
explicit and rigorously authenticated hadiths that specify it with absolute clarity. In contrast, there is consensus
among scholars concerning the nisab for silver, which is established at two hundred dirhams.
According to al-Qaradawi (2006), the frequent reference to silver (dirham) in prophetic traditions, as opposed to
gold (dinar), can be attributed to the widespread use of silver currency among the Arabs during the formative
period of Islam.
Nevertheless, the majority of fuqahāʾ maintain that the nisab for gold zakat is twenty mithqāl, equivalent to
twenty dinars. Ibn Qudāmah (2003) affirms that there is ijmāʿ (consensus) among the jurists on this matter,
noting that only one narration from al-Hasan al-Basrī suggests a differing view of forty mithqāl or dinars. Al-
Shawkānī (1973), however, mentions another narration indicating that al-Hasan al-Basrī ultimately concurred
with the majority opinion.
The textual evidence supporting the nisab of twenty mithqāl or dinars is found in the hadith of ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib,
in which the Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
There is no zakat on you for gold until you possess twenty dinars. When you have twenty dinars and ḥawl (one
full year) has passed over them, half a dinar is due as zakat. Any additional amount shall be assessed
proportionally.(Abu Dāwūd, 2008)
A further point of discussion among the fuqaha (jurist) concerns whether the determination of twenty mithqāl is
based on the weight of gold itself or its equivalence to two hundred dirhams. This debate arises because silver
currency (dirham) was the predominant medium of exchange in early Islamic society.
According to Ibn Qudāmah (2003), the majority of jurists contend that the standard of twenty mithqāl is derived
from gold itself rather than its monetary equivalence to silver. However, some jurists including ʿAṭāʾ, Ṭāwūs,
al-Zuh, Sulaimān ibn Ḥarb, and Ayyūb al-Sakhtiyā argue that it is based on the value of silver. In their
view, any amount of gold equal in value to two hundred dirhams is zakatable, whereas anything below that value
is exempt. Their argument rests on the assertion that there is no ṣaḥī(authentic) hadith directly specifying the
nisab of gold by its own weight.
This latter claim, however, is refuted by the existence of numerous narrations that refer explicitly to dinars
independent of dirhams. Al-Qaradawi (2006) notes that although the individual chains of these narrations may
not all be strong, their collective corroboration (tawātur maʿnawī) strengthens their evidentiary value. Among
these is the narration by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Anṣārī, which reports:
In the letter of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) and in the letter of ʿUmar regarding zakat, it is
stated: Nothing is taken from gold until it reaches two hundred dinars. When it reaches twenty dinars, half a
dinar is due as zakat. As for silver, nothing is taken until it reaches two hundred dirhams; when it reaches two
hundred dirhams, five dirhams are due.(Abū ʿUbayd, 1989).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1827
www.rsisinternational.org
Another hadith narrated by ʿAmr ibn Shuʿaib, from his father, from his grandfather, reports that the Prophet
(peace be upon him) said:
There is no zakat on gold less than twenty mithqāl, and no zakat on silver less than two hundred dirhams.(A
ʿUbayd, 1989)
Additionally, the narrations of Ibn ʿUmar and ʿĀʾishah state:
The Prophet (peace be upon him) levied zakat on twenty dinars at the rate of half a dinar, and on forty dinars
one full dinar.(Ibn Mājah, 2008)
Beyond these hadiths, the position of the majority of jurists is further supported by historical evidence. Al-
Qaradawi (2006) records that during the Prophets era, one dinar was equivalent in value to ten dirhams. Ibn
Qudāmah (2003) emphasises that zakat on gold is imposed based on the physical substance of gold itself, not its
market value. Hence, the determination of its nisab must be based on the intrinsic measure of gold, not in relation
to other assets consistent with the principle that zakat is assessed according to the nature of each specific
wealth category.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study employs a qualitative research design utilizing Document Analysis as the primary method. The core
document selected for analysis is the Fatwa Sistem Pengurusan Kutipan Zakat Negeri Selangor 2017
(Amendment 2022), which serves as the authoritative legal framework for zakat management in the state.
Additionally, secondary data was sourced from LZS annual reports (2020–2024) and official educational
directives.
Data Analysis: The textual data were coded and analysed using a thematic approach. The analysis focused on
three specific themes derived from the Fatwa: (i) The Principle of Growth (Al-Nama'), (ii) Assessment of
Physical vs. Digital Assets, and (iii) Treatment of Non-Compliant Investments. This triangulated approach
ensures the validity of the findings by comparing theological rulings (Fiqh) with operational guidelines (Fatwa)
and actual execution (Collection Data).
Classification of Gold Subject to Zakat
According to al-Qaradawi (2006), gold liable for zakat can be classified into two primary categories. The first
category includes unprocessed or trade-based gold, such as bullion, ingots, or any form used as a medium of
exchange or investment. The second category encompasses gold used in manufactured forms, such as jewellery,
ornaments, utensils, and decorative items. Both categories are subject to zakat, provided that specific conditions
of ownership, nisab, and haul are fulfilled.
Fiqh Ruling and Principles of Zakat on Gold
The majority of fuqahāʾ (Islamic jurists) hold the opinion that zakat is not obligatory on gold used as womens
jewellery. According to Ibn Qudāmah (2003), this view was upheld by several Companions including Ibn ʿUmar,
Jābir, Anas, ʿĀʾishah, and Asmāʾ, and later by al-Shaʿbī, Qatādah, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī, and ʿAmrah. It
subsequently became the view of Imām Mālik, al-Shāfiʿī, Abū ʿUbayd, Isḥāq, and Abū Thawr. Al-Qaradā
(2006) summarized the evidence supporting this position as follows:
There is no authentic shariah text (nas)—neither from the Qur’an nor from qiyās (analogical reasoning)—that
establishes zakat as obligatory on gold jewellery used for personal adornment.
a) If gold is used as personal adornment, it is no longer considered a productive asset (māl nāmiʿ). The principle
of zakat applies primarily to assets that are capable of growth or generate income. By analogy, livestock such as
camels or cattle used for ploughing are not subject to zakat, as they serve personal or utilitarian purposes rather
than productive ones.
In contrast, the Ḥanafī school holds that zakat must be paid on gold jewellery. According to Ibn Qudāmah (2003),
this opinion was transmitted from ʿUmar ibn Masʿūd, Ibn ʿAbs, ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿAmr ibn al-ʿĀṣ, Saʿīd ibn al-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1828
www.rsisinternational.org
Musayyib, Saʿīd ibn Jubayr, ʿAṭāʾ, Mujāhid, ʿAbdullāh ibn Shaddād, bir ibn Zayd, Ibn n, Maymūn ibn
Mihrān, al-Zuh, and al-Thawrī. Their reasoning is based on the following evidence:
The general meaning of the Qur’anic verse obligating zakat on gold:
And those who hoard gold and silver and do not spend them in the way of Allah give them tidings of a
painful punishment.” (Surah al-Tawbah, 9:34)
According to al-Kāsā(2003), this verse does not distinguish between women’s jewellery and other forms of
gold or silver. Hence, anyone who possesses gold or silver in any form and fails to pay zakat is subject to the
severe warning mentioned by Allah SWT.
The general wording of the hadith obligating zakat on gold:
Whoever owns gold or silver and does not pay its zakat, sheets of fire will be prepared for him on the Day of
Resurrection, and his sides and back will be branded with them...” (Muslim, 2008)
This hadith, like the Qur’anic verse, makes no distinction between women’s jewellery and other types of gold
and silver. Al-Qaradāwī (2006), after reviewing the differing opinions on this matter, concluded that the stronger
(rāji) opinion is that zakat is not obligatory on women’s jewellery, except in two specific cases:
When gold jewellery is not worn and is instead kept as savings or investment, it becomes liable for zakat as it
takes on the nature of a store of wealth rather than personal adornment.
When the amount of jewellery exceeds customary norms (ʿurf) and becomes extravagant or ostentatious, such
excess is discouraged (makrūh) and liable to zakat as it falls outside the bounds of moderation approved by the
Shariah.
Application of Zakat on Gold in Selangor
In Malaysia, gold jewellery is subject to zakat only if it exceeds the customary threshold (ʿurf) determined for
women’s adornment. The calculation methods vary between states, but generally, two approaches are applied:
1. Zakat is imposed on the total value of gold exceeding the nisab, or
2. Zakat is imposed only on the excess above the ʿurf threshold.
The State of Selangor adopts the second method, whereby zakat is levied only on the excess above the ʿurf limit.
This approach is also practised in most Malaysian states, including the Federal Territories, Johor, Terengganu,
Kedah, Negeri Sembilan, Melaka, Sabah, and Sarawak.
The determination of ʿurf is based on research and deliberation (muzakarah) by the respective State Fatwa
Committees. In Selangor, the legal ruling (fatwa) on gold jewellery zakat is as follows:
No.
State
Customary Limit (ʿUrf)
Zakat Imposed On
1
Selangor
800 grams
Amount exceeding ʿurf
According to the Selangor Government Gazette dated 22 May 2018 [MAIS/SU/BUU/01-2/002/2016-3(4); P.U.
Sel. PS. 05/4/12]:
1. The customary limit (ʿurf) for gold jewellery in Selangor is 800 grams. Any amount exceeding this limit is
subject to zakat.
2. The earlier fatwa on the customary limit [Sel. P.U. 15] gazetted on 23 June 2005 is hereby revoked.
The implementation of gold zakat in Selangor is governed by the Fatwa on Zakat Collection Management
System (Amendment 2022). The analysis reveals that LZS operates based on four fundamental principles of
collection:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1829
www.rsisinternational.org
1. Immediacy (Fauriyyah): Zakat must be remitted immediately once the conditions are met, without delay.
2. Prevention of Double Taxation: Zakat is not levied twice on the same wealth within the same haul.
3. Growth Asset (Al-Namā'): Gold is categorized as an asset that grows or has the potential to grow,
distinguishing it from assets for personal use (qunyah).
4. Wealth of the Solvent: Zakat is collected from those who possess nisab.
Based on these principles, LZS classifies gold into four distinct categories:
1. Stored gold () – gold kept for saving or investment purposes.
2. Women’s jewellery () gold used as personal adornment but exceeding the permissible limit according
to fiqh guidelines.
3. Pledged gold
4. Non-physical gold investment gold pledged as collateral or invested in non-Shariah-compliant digital
gold schemes, which are subject to zakat based on contemporary fiqh rulings.
This classification reflects the institutional effort of LZS to align traditional fiqh rulings with modern financial
realities, ensuring that gold zakat administration remains relevant, transparent, and in accordance with Islamic
legal principles.
Gold Jewellery (Al-Ḥulī)
According to Lembaga Zakat Selangor (2025), gold jewellery (al-ḥuli) refers to gold used for personal
adornment, ornaments, household items, or furniture, whether used occasionally or regularly. Zakat is obligatory
when the total weight exceeds the customary threshold (ʿurf), currently set at 800 grams in Selangor.
Example of calculation:
Customary threshold (ʿurf): 800 grams
Formula: [(Total weight ʿUrf) × Current gold price × 2.5%]
Example: (900g 800g) × RM144.38 = RM14,438 × 2.5% = RM360.95
Zakat on Stored Gold and Investment (
)
Differences of opinion among scholars arise only when gold jewellery is possessed purely for personal use and
in amounts deemed customary or reasonable. However, when gold is kept for savings purposes or exceeds the
normal usage limit, all fuqahāʾ (jurists) agree that such gold is subject to zakat.
Stored gold refers to gold that is not worn or used, functioning purely as savings or wealth accumulation, even
if it physically resembles jewellery. This category includes jewellery items that are no longer used, such as those
damaged, outdated, or retained merely for storage value. It also includes gold ornaments owned by men, even
though wearing them is prohibited (ḥarām) under Islamic law.
According to al-Nawawī (1983), if a person manufactures gold or silver ornaments without the intention of using
them but instead to store or preserve value, then according to the sound and authoritative opinion of the jurists,
zakat is obligatory on such items.
If the weight of the stored gold equals or exceeds the nisab of 85 grams, and it has been held for one lunar year
(ḥawl), zakat must be paid at the rate of 2.5% (one-fortieth) of its total value. This ruling is based on the hadith
of the Prophet (peace be upon him):
There is nothing due on you in gold until you possess twenty dinars. When you have twenty dinars and a year
has passed over it, half a dinar is due as zakat. Whatever exceeds that shall be calculated proportionally.(A
Dāwūd, 2008)
According to Lembaga Zakat Selangor (2025), non-jewellery gold (ghayr al-ḥulī) refers to gold not intended for
adornment, whether in the form of currency, bullion, bars, coins, jewellery, or other similar items.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1830
www.rsisinternational.org
This category of gold is subject to zakat at the rate of 2.5% of the total amount owned, provided that its weight
equals or exceeds the nisab, which is 85 grams. This differs from women’s jewellery, which follows the ʿurf-
based (customary) threshold rule. The nisab for stored or non-jewellery gold is therefore 85 grams.
Formula for Calculation:
(Weight of stored gold [if exceeding nisab] × Current gold price × 2.5%)
Example:
If the weight of stored gold exceeds the nisab value, the zakat payable is calculated based on the formula below:
[(Weight of gold Customary limit (ʿurf)) × Current gold price × 2.5%]
(900 grams − 800 grams) × RM144.38 = RM14,438 × 2.5% = RM360.95
Hence, the zakat due on the stored gold amounts to RM360.95, based on the excess weight of 100 grams above
the ʿurf threshold and the prevailing gold price of RM144.38 per gram.
Pledged Gold
Gold that has been pledged as collateral (rahn) is considered to be under full ownership (al-milk al-tāmm)
of the pledger. Therefore, it remains subject to zakat, provided that the value of the outstanding loan and
the safekeeping fee (upah simpan) are first deducted from the total value of the gold. Zakat is then
calculated on the net value at the standard rate of 2.5%.
Formula for Calculation:
[(Current weight of gold × Current gold price) Loan amount Safekeeping fee] × 2.5% = Zakat payable
Example:
[(200 grams × RM144.38 = RM28,876) RM10,000 RM76] × 2.5% = RM470
Thus, the total zakat due on the pledged gold is RM470, calculated after deducting the loan balance and
safekeeping charges from the current market value of the gold.
Non-Physical and Digital Gold Investment
LZS addresses the complexity of modern digital gold (e-gold) through a rigorous Shariah screening process.
According to the Fatwa (Amendment 2022), digital gold accounts are assessed based on the validity of the
contract (aqad):
Shariah-Compliant Digital Gold: If the investment involves physical backing and transferable ownership
(milik sempurna), it is treated as standard gold storage. Zakat is payable on the total value (Principal +
Profit) if it meets the nisab.
Non-Shariah Compliant Schemes: For gold schemes that lack physical backing or involve elements of riba
(usury) or invalid contracts (aqad batil), the asset is deemed legally defective. However, recognizing the
financial value held by the investor, LZS applies the principle of Mal Mustafād (acquired wealth).
Crucially, the Fatwa mandates that zakat is levied only on the principal investment amount (2.5%), while
the profits generated from non-compliant elements are prohibited (haram) and must be channeled to
Baitulmal for public welfare, rather than being purified through zakat.
Non-physical gold investment schemes that do not comply with Shariah principles are assessed as cash savings
for zakat purposes. These schemes typically use the current market price of gold as the basis for determining
investment value, despite the fact that the institution offering the product does not possess the physical gold
underlying the transaction.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1831
www.rsisinternational.org
Such investments are invalid (bāṭil) and prohibited (ḥarām) in Islamic law. They fall under the category of
transactions involving the sale of an item that does not exist physically, or the sale of something that the seller
does not own—both of which render the contract invalid due to the absence of essential conditions for a valid
akad, including transferable ownership and lawful possession of the subject matter (Lembaga Zakat Selangor,
2025).
Any profits arising from these invalid transactions are considered arām and therefore not subject to zakat.
However, the initial capital invested remains alal wealth. Consequently, if the capital amount reaches or exceeds
the nisab, zakat must be paid at the rate of 2.5% on the principal amount (Lembaga Zakat Selangor, 2025).
In contrast, when an irregular (fāsid) contract—one that fails to fulfil all the conditions or pillars of a valid sale
is later accompanied by qabd (actual transfer of ownership or possession), the transaction assumes the status of
complete ownership. In such cases, zakat becomes obligatory on both the principal and any resulting gain, since
the wealth is deemed fully owned despite the initial contractual irregularity (Lembaga Zakat Selangor, 2025).
Table 1: Zakat Status of Non–Shariah-Compliant Gold Investment
Type of Contract (Akad)
Description
Ownership Status
Zakat Ruling (LZS Practice)
Invalid Contract
(Akad Bāṭil)
A contract lacking essential
conditions (rukun), such as
the absence of physical gold
(non-existent subject
matter) or ribawi elements.
Void
(Ownership does
not transfer)
Obligatory on Principal Only
(Profit is prohibited/haram and
must be channelled to
Baitulmal)
Irregular Contract without
Possession
(Akad Fāsid without
Qabd)
A contract that is valid in
essence but defective in
description, where
possession (qabd) of the
gold has not yet taken place.
Incomplete
(Ownership has
not yet transferred)
Not Obligatory on the Gold
(Zakat remains on the
cash/capital held by the
investor)
Irregular Contract with
Possession
(Akad Fāsid with Qabd)
A contract that is defective
in description but is
subsequently rectified by
the physical or constructive
possession (qabd) of the
gold.
Valid / Complete
(Ownership is
established)
Obligatory on Total Value
(Principal + Profit/Capital
Appreciation)
Table 1 summarizes the zakat implications based on the validity of the gold investment contract. It is important
to note that for Invalid Contracts (Akad ṭil), while the contract itself yields no halal profit, LZS governance
mandates that zakat is still obligatory on the principal investment amount, as this capital remains the legal
property of the investor (Lembaga Zakat Selangor, 2022).
Analysis of Gold Zakat Collection at Lembaga Zakat Selangor
The collection of gold zakat by Lembaga Zakat Selangor (LZS) exhibits a consistent upward trend over the five-
year period from 2020 to 2024, reflecting a growing awareness among the Muslim community regarding the
obligation to pay gold zakat.
Based on annual collection records, the amount of gold zakat received increased significantly following the
implementation of digital zakat payment initiatives and awareness campaigns conducted through social media
platforms and community-based programmes.
This upward trajectory is further influenced by LZS’s efforts to expand the categorisation of zakatable gold,
encompassing jewellery gold, stored gold, and investment gold, as well as the introduction of online gold zakat
calculation services.
Overall, the pattern of gold zakat collection from 2020 to 2024 demonstrates the effectiveness of LZS’s zakat
management strategies in adapting to evolving socioeconomic conditions and strengthening the institution’s role
as a catalyst for community welfare and economic empowerment.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1832
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 2: Gold Zakat Collection at Lembaga Zakat Selangor
No.
Year
Amount Collected
1
2024
RM9.28 million
2
2023
RM8 million
3
2022
RM6.5 million
4
2021
RM5,531,476
5
2020
RM4,369,797
Source: Annual Report of Lembaga Zakat Selangor
While LZS has successfully codified its gold zakat management through the 2022 Fatwa amendment, several
challenges remain:
1. The Complexity of Digital Ownership: The rise of cryptocurrency-backed gold tokens and diverse digital
gold banking products poses a challenge in determining milk al-tamm (complete ownership). While the
Fatwa provides a guideline, the rapid evolution of fintech requires continuous updates to the Fatwa to
prevent regulatory lag.
2. Literacy regarding "Principal vs. Profit": There is a literacy gap regarding non-Shariah-compliant gold
investments. The public often confuses "cleaning" wealth (zakat) with "purifying" income from haram
sources. LZS’s enforcement of paying zakat only on the principal of invalid gold schemes requires
aggressive educational campaigns to ensure the public does not mistakenly pay zakat on haram profits,
thinking it legitimizes the income.
3. The High Urf Threshold: Selangor’s urf for jewellery (800g) is significantly higher than other Malaysian
states (e.g., Kedah or Kelantan). While this benefits women who own gold for adornment, it effectively
reduces the zakat base. This policy reflects a lenient fiqh approach intended to ease the burden on the
public, but it necessitates periodic review to ensure it remains consistent with actual societal wealth
patterns.
CONCLUSION
The implementation of gold zakat by Lembaga Zakat Selangor (LZS) demonstrates the capability of a state zakat
institution to integrate classical fiqh principles with the realities of a modern economic environment. The
decision to classify gold zakat into four categories—jewellery, stored gold, pledged gold, and gold investment
reflects a dynamic and adaptive fiqh-based approach that aligns with contemporary forms of asset ownership.
The clarity of the gold zakat guidelines, grounded in the Selangor State Fatwa, and the enforcement of an 800-
gram ʿurf threshold for women’s jewellery signify LZS’s commitment to applying Shariah rulings based on the
principles of malaḥah and local custom (ʿurf). The upward trend in gold zakat collection from 2020 to 2024
further illustrates the effectiveness of LZS’s strategies in strengthening public awareness through zakat education
campaigns, digitalisation of payment systems, and the restructuring of collection mechanisms and customer
services.
Nonetheless, several areas warrant attention to enhance the governance of gold zakat in the future.
First, LZS is encouraged to expand research collaborations with academic institutions to assess public
understanding of gold zakat, including issues related to ʿurf valuation, zakat computation for digital gold
investments, and the legal implications of non–Shariah-compliant investment contracts.
Second, a comprehensive and integrated gold zakat education module should be developed for schools,
universities, and community platforms to systematically educate the public on the rulings, thresholds, and
payment mechanisms for gold zakat.
Third, LZS should continue strengthening its digital zakat infrastructure by improving mobile applications with
features such as automated calculation functions, real-time gold price monitoring, and personalised ḥawl
notifications to enhance compliance.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 1833
www.rsisinternational.org
Fourth, communication strategies grounded in behavioural insights and psychological principles should be
adopted to encourage zakat literacy among younger generations, particularly those more inclined toward digital
gold investment.
In conclusion, the implementation of gold zakat in Selangor reflects the successful operationalisation of fiqh al-
zakāh principles within an institutional framework. The integration of jurisprudence, technological innovation,
and continuous education serves as the foundation for strengthening the national zakat system. LZS’s success in
administering gold zakat not only enhances the economic resilience of the Muslim community but also
contributes significantly to the broader objectives of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah - promoting social justice, economic
balance, and the holistic well-being of the ummah in Malaysia.
REFERENCES
1. A ‘Ubayd al-Qāsim bin Salām (1989), Kitāb al-Aml. Bayrūt: Dār al-Shurūq.
2. ADāwud Sulaymān Ibn al-Ash‘ath al-Sajistānī (2008), “Sunan Abū Dāwuddalam Mawsu‘at al-Ḥadith
al-Sharif: al-Kutub al-Sittah, ed. Salih bin ‘Abd al-‘Aziz Al al-Shaykh. Riyad: Dar al-Salam.
3. Azri Bhari, Mohd Faiz Mohamed Yusof, Mohammad Mahyuddin Khalid, Mohd Ashrof Zaki Yaakob,
Mohamad Shukran Abdul Razak (2019), Aplikasi Fiqh Zakat Emas Di Malaysia, Journal of Fatwa
Management and Research, 17(2)2019, 265-282 (Special Edition), ISSN: 2232-1047 eISSN: 0127-8886,
https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol0no0.286
4. Ibn Majah (2008), “Sunan Ibn Majahdalam Mawsu‘at al-Ḥadith al-Sharif: al-Kutub al-Sittah, ed. Salih
bin ‘Abd al-‘Aziz Al al-Shaykh. Riyad: Dar al-Salam.
5. Ibn Qudāmah al-Maqdisī (2003), al-Mughnī. Cet. ke-6. Jilid 1.Urdun: Bayt al-Afkar al-Duwaliah.
6. Al-Kasani, al-Imam ‘Ala al-Din Abi Bakr bin Mas‘ud al-Hanafi (2003), Bada‘i al-Sana‘i. Cet. ke-2. Jilid
ke-2. Bayrūt: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
7. Lembaga Zakat Selangor (2025), https://www.zakatselangor.com.my/ (diakses pada 1 November 2025)
8. Lembaga Zakat Selangor (MAIS). (2022). Fatwa Sistem Pengurusan Kutipan Zakat Negeri Selangor 2017
(Pindaan 2022). Selangor: Majlis Agama Islam Selangor.
9. Muslim, Abu al-Husayn Muslim bin al-Hajjaj (2008), “Sahih Muslim. Dalam Mawsu‘at al-Hadith al-
Sharif: al-Kutub al-Sittah, ed. Salih bin ‘Abd al-‘Aziz Al al-Shaykh. Riyad: Dar al-Salam.
10. Al-Nawa, al-Imām Abī Zakariyyā Muḥy al-Dīn bin Sharaf (1983), Sharh Sahih Muslim, Kaherah: Dar
al-Fikr.
11. Al-Qarāḍāwī, Yūsuf (2006), Fiqh al-Zakāh Dirāsah Muqāranah li Ahkāmihā wa falsafatihā fi Daw al-
Qur’ān wa al-Sunnah. Cet. ke-25. Jilid ke-2. Qāhirah: Maktabah Wahbah.
12. Al-Syawkani, Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad (1973), Nayl al-Autar, Beirut: Dar al-Jalil.
13. Warta Kerajaan Negeri Selangor, 22 Mei 2018, [MAIS/SU/BUU/01-2/002/2016-3(4); P.U. Sel. PS.
05/4/12]