INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Occupations and Tribal Livelihood:ACase Study of Trans Himalayan  
Region of Ladakh, India  
Dr Tsering Yangzom  
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Jammu  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 03 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
Traditionally, agriculture and animal husbandry have been the primary sources of livelihood for tribal  
communities, particularly in rural and remote regions. However, over the years, there has been a noticeable  
shift in the occupational structure of tribal households. The study aims to examine the patterns of occupations  
among tribal households of present Ladakh. The study was part of the research project funded by University of  
Jammu under the Seed and Research grant. The sample size of the study is 500 scheduled tribe household  
heads, that is 414 from rural areas and 86 from urban areas of Ladakh. The study reveals that 88.4 percent of  
the sampled households obtained livelihood from non-traditional based economic activities and it further  
reveals that most of the heads are self-employed, primarily as own-account workers. A sector-wise analysis  
indicates that rural tribal heads predominantly rely their livelihood from rent, pensions, or remittances, while  
those in urban areas are mainly engaged in regular salaried employment. At the same time, a huge chunk of  
heads is into casual labour work as well. Thus, the policy suggestion is, introduce targeted employment  
guarantee schemes and rural infrastructure projects to provide stable and year-round work opportunities for  
casual labourers for remote areas like Durbuk and Nyoma.  
Keywords: Livelihood, Tribal, Household, Main Occupation, Trans Himalaya  
INTRODUCTION  
Occupational status serves as a key indicator of the socio-economic standing and developmental trajectory of  
any community. For tribal populations, it reflects a complex interplay of tradition, environment, access to  
resources, and exposure to mainstream economic systems. The occupational choices of household heads, who  
often act as primary earners and decision-makers, directly impact household income, social mobility, and  
intergenerational opportunities. Historically, tribal communities have been primarily engaged in traditional  
occupations such as agriculture, animal husbandry, forest-based activities, and artisanal crafts. These  
livelihoods were closely linked to their ecological surroundings and cultural practices. However, over the past  
few decades, there has been a marked transition from these traditional forms of employment toward more  
modern and diversified occupations. This shift has been driven by factors such as urbanization, educational  
advancement, state-led development programs, and integration with broader markets.  
The present paper investigates primarily the descriptive aspects of the occupational status of tribal household  
heads, focusing on both the current distribution of employment types and the ongoing transition from  
traditional to modern livelihoods. It analyses sector-wise participation, differences across rural and urban  
settings, and the role of policy interventions in facilitating or hindering occupational mobility. By examining  
this transition, the study aims to shed light on how tribal communities are adapting to changing economic  
landscapes and what challenges and opportunities this transformation presents.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
Tribal communities represent significant part of a society and a majority of these people reside in rural regions  
with primitive pattern of livelihood. Tribals are marginalised class (Roy, 1989) and relatively deprived  
compared with non-tribal people in many aspects (Srivastava, 200%), The livelihoods of indigenous  
Page 1910  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
communities are increasingly becoming unsustainable as their ancestral lands no longer provide sufficient  
support for their families. The availability and variety of natural resources have traditionally shaped the  
livelihood patterns of tribal populations. However, empirical studies suggest that since the early 1990s, rural  
tribal groups have begun diversifying their livelihood strategies as a response to the uncertainties brought  
about by changing agro-climatic conditions, socio-political shifts, and economic challenges.  
Islam (2014) in his study observed that the tribal people in Jharkhand diversify their livelihood towards  
forestry resources and derive a significant employment and income through forestry interventions.  
Suryanarayana (1983) found that the tribal people are engaged in agricultural activities hardly for 4 months in  
a year, and during off season, they are living through collection of forest products, fishing and hunting.  
In their study on livelihood options among tribal communities in West Bengal, Satpati and Sharma (2021)  
noted that enhanced educational access for the younger generation has the potential to create new employment  
avenues and promote economic diversification, ultimately improving the economic well-being of tribal  
populations. They also highlighted that seasonal migration, particularly among young men and women, is a  
common strategy for livelihood diversification in the western regions of West Bengal.  
Oraon (2012), in his study on the shifting livelihood patterns of tribal communities in Sundargarh district,  
Odisha, concluded that economically disadvantaged tribal households facing uncertain environments often  
resort to livelihood diversification as a means of securing their subsistence. A common strategy adopted  
involves engaging in non-farm activities and undertaking seasonal migration to other regions.  
Aram (1972), in his study on the Naga tribes of the North Eastern Region, observed a transition within Naga  
society from traditional systems to more modern agro-industrial sectors. He noted that while some segments of  
the Naga population experienced increased wealth, a significant portion continued to live under traditional  
standards of living.  
Choudhary (2013) explored the impact of microfinance on tribal communities in Madhya Pradesh, focusing on  
Hoshangabad, Sehore, and Raisen districts. The study found that Self-Help Groups (SHGs) helped reduce  
poverty by improving access to credit, promoting livelihood diversification, empowering women, and lowering  
reliance on informal moneylenders. While microfinance shows promise, its broader success requires increased  
awareness, better coordination between financial sectors, and a shift in banking attitudes toward the poor.  
Mehta et al. (2022) examined the determinants of livelihood diversification among tribal households in  
Kinnaur District, Himachal Pradesh, using data from 120 households. The study found that diversification was  
highest among salaried and agriculture-plus-services groups. Education, irrigation access, organizational  
membership, and training had a positive impact, while a higher land-man ratio negatively affected  
diversification. The authors recommend that regional policies focus on education, skill development,  
institutional participation, and irrigation improvement to strengthen tribal livelihoods.  
Marchang (2019), in a working paper published by the Institute for Social and Economic Change, examined  
the changing occupational patterns of Scheduled Tribes in North East India. Using secondary data and field  
surveys from Manipur, the study highlights a shift from traditional agricultureespecially shifting  
cultivationtowards non-agricultural and market-oriented employment. This transition is largely influenced  
by education and overall economic development.  
Sreekutty and Joseph (2021) examined livelihood diversification among tribal communities in India, focusing  
on their gradual shift from traditional agriculture due to low income and high risk. The study distinguishes  
between "push" factors like climate variability and "pull" factors such as better income opportunities,  
analyzing the socio-demographic influences behind this shift. It highlights the importance of non-agricultural  
strategies and stresses that access to education and skills is essential for reducing vulnerability and achieving  
sustainable livelihoods.  
Kundu (2024) explores the vital yet underrecognized role of tribal women in rural and marginalized economies  
across India. Despite their active participation in agriculture, forest-based livelihoods, and informal labor, their  
Page 1911  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
contributions remain undervalued, leading to systemic marginalization. Using a mixed-method approach, the  
study highlights the challenges posed by gender bias and limited institutional support, and recommends  
policies aimed at improving access to markets, skill development, and government programs to enhance their  
economic and social empowerment.  
Collectively, these studies explore the evolving economic and livelihood patterns among tribal communities in  
India, revealing a marked transition from traditional, agriculture-based subsistence to diversified, non-  
agricultural livelihoods. Several works underscore the growing importance of microfinance in fostering  
financial inclusion and entrepreneurship, while others highlight the contribution of tribal art to tourism and  
small-scale industries as viable sources of sustainable income. Key determinants of this shift include  
education, access to irrigation, and institutional support, which enhance the capacity of tribal households to  
pursue varied income-generating activities. Overall, the literature reflects a complex yet significant  
transformation, wherein increased access to resources and opportunities is gradually integrating tribal  
populations into modern, market-driven economies, contributing to improved socio-economic well-being.  
Despite extensive studies on tribal livelihoods across India, limited research focuses on the tribal communities  
of Ladakh UT. The region’s unique ecological, cultural, and administrative context remains underexplored,  
particularly in terms of livelihood diversification and economic transitions. There is a pressing need for region-  
specific studies to understand how tribal households in Ladakh are adapting to changing socio-economic  
conditions and to inform context-appropriate policy interventions.  
DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS  
The present paper investigates the patterns of occupational structure of tribal household heads and the extent to  
which the households are shifting from traditional to modern income generating activities (non-farm based  
income generating activities). It analyzes sector-wise participation, differences across blocks. By examining  
the extent to which household obtain source of livelihood from non-traditional sources, the study aims to shed  
light on how tribal communities are adapting to changing economic landscapes and opportunities at present.  
Table 1: Characteristics of the Sampled Tribal Households  
Household Characteristics  
Frequencies  
Percentage  
58  
11.6  
88.4  
100.0  
34.2  
4.0  
FARM /NON FARM  
Farm Based (Household Livelihood)  
Non -Farm Based (Household Livelihood)  
BLOCKS  
Leh  
442  
500  
171  
20  
Chushot  
Thiksey  
Kharu  
22  
22  
22  
4.4  
4.4  
4.4  
Nimoo  
14  
2.8  
Saspol  
20  
4.0  
Skurbuchan  
Khaltsi  
33  
30  
6.6  
6.0  
Durbuk  
Nyoma  
21  
33  
4.2  
6.6  
Rong  
8
1.6  
Rupsho  
Disket  
40  
24  
8.0  
4.8  
Panamik  
Turtuk  
RELIGIONS (HH)  
Buddhism  
Muslim  
20  
4.0  
500  
446  
54  
100.0  
89.2  
10.8  
100.0  
500  
Page 1912  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
119  
73  
43  
23.8  
14.6  
8.6  
LEVEL OF EDUCATION (Head)  
Illiterate  
Under-metric  
Metric  
27  
18  
5.4  
3.6  
12th Passed  
Under Graduate  
1
.2  
Post Graduate  
1
.2  
MPhil/PhD  
Post Doctorate  
MAIN OCCUPATION (Head)  
Own Account Worker (HH Ent.)  
Employer (HH Ent.)  
Helper (HH Ent.)  
Regular Salaried Worker  
Casual Labour in Public Works  
Casual Labour in Other Types of Work  
Did Not Work but Seeking  
Attended Domestic Duties  
Rentiers/Pensioners  
Not Able to Work due to Disability  
AGE CATEGORY (Head)  
Category 1 (20-29 years)  
Category 2 (30-59 years)  
Category 3 (60 and Above)  
GENDER (Head)  
218  
500  
126  
12  
2
94  
47  
24  
1
51  
132  
11  
500  
4
271  
225  
500  
396  
104  
500  
43.6  
100.0  
25.2  
2.4  
.4  
18.8  
9.4  
4.8  
.2  
10.2  
26.4  
2.2  
100.0  
.8  
54.2  
45.0  
100.0  
79.2  
20.8  
100.0  
Male  
Female  
Source: Author’s computations  
Occupational Status of the Heads of the Tribal Households: The study uses Usual Principal Status (UPS)  
method to measure the incidence and variation of employment and unemployment among the sampled  
households. The table 2 shows that, out of the 500 sampled households, the majority of the heads of the  
sampled households that is 61.2 percent are engaged in Labour force and only 38.8 percent are outside of the  
labour force. This means that 61.2 percent of the sample households heads are either employed or did not work  
but looking for work. In order to see the share of employed and unemployed, it is that 99.7 percent are  
employed and only 0.3 percent are unemployed.  
Table 2: Occupations of the Heads of Tribal Households in Leh District  
Main Occupation (Heads)  
OwnAccountWorker (HH Ent)  
Employer (HH Ent)  
Helper (HH Ent) (Unpaid HH Worker)  
Regular Salaried  
Casual Labour in Public work  
Casual labour in Other Types of Work  
Did not work but seeking and available for work  
Attended Domestic Duties and free collection of goods  
Rentiers, Pensioners, Remittances  
Not able to work due to disability  
Total  
Frequency  
Percentage  
25.2  
2.4  
.4  
18.8  
9.4  
4.8  
.2  
10.2  
26.4  
2.2  
126  
12  
2
94  
47  
24  
1
51  
132  
11  
500  
100.0  
Source: Authors’ Computations  
Page 1913  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
However, among the employed heads of the sampled households, the majority of them are engaged in Self-  
Employment i.e., they work as own account worker in household enterprises and the share is 41.2 percent.  
Then, second largest share goes to Regular salaried workers and the share is 30.7 percent. then 15.4 of the total  
shares at third place with Casual labour in public work which is followed by Casual labour in other work that  
is 7.8 percent. then 3.9 percent of the total share for Employer in household enterprise. Then 0.7 percent of the  
heads are engaged in household enterprises as helper and they account for unpaid labour force. Lastly, with the  
share of only 0.3 percent with the heads who are did not work but seeking employment. In order to look into  
the matter from gender lens, it has been found that out of the total labour force, 82.4 percent of the heads are  
males and 17.6 percent are females.  
Sector wise Occupational status of the Heads of the Tribal Households: The results have been shown in Table  
3. A sector wise comparison can be observed from the tables, it has been observed that most of the rural heads  
are rentiers, pensioners, remittances recipients etc that is around 26.3 percent of them and that shows that  
biggest share of them are outside labour force, whereas, among the urban heads, majority of them that is 27.1  
percent of them are Regular salaried employee, followed by Rentiers, pensioners, remittance recipients, etc  
that is around 25.9 percent and then at third place own account workers with a share of 24.7 percent. A huge  
chunk of them that is 8.2 percent are Employer. Therefore, it has been interpreted that urban heads are  
relatively more into self-employment than the rural heads, whereas, rural heads are relatively more into casual  
work than urban heads.  
Table 3: Sector wise Occupational Status of the Heads of Tribal Households  
Main Occupational (Heads)  
Rural Households  
Urban Households  
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage  
Own Account Worker (HH Ent)  
Employer (HH Ent)  
Helper (HH Ent) (Unpaid HH Worker)  
Regular Salaried  
Casual Labour in Public work  
Casual labour in Other Types of Work  
Did not work but seeking and available for work  
105  
5
2
71  
44  
19  
1
25.4  
1.2  
.5  
17.1  
10.6  
4.6  
21  
7
-
23  
3
5
24.7  
8.2  
-
27.1  
3.5  
5.9  
-
2
-
Attended Domestic Duties and free collection of goods 48  
11.6  
26.3  
2.4  
3
22  
1
3.5  
25.9  
1.2  
100.0  
Rentiers, Pensioners, Remittances  
Not able to work due to disability  
Total  
109  
10  
414  
100.0  
85  
Source: Authors’ Computations  
Gender Wise Occupational Status of the Heads of the Tribal Households: The table 4 shows the occupational  
status of the heads among the total male heads in labour force, it is seen that majority of the male heads are  
engaged into employment as Own account workers that is 40.9 percent, followed by 31.7 percent of them  
engaged in to employment as Regular salaried employee. A total of 21.9 percent of them are into employment  
as casual workers, whereas, 4.4 percent of them are working as Employer in household enterprises and 0.8  
percent of them as unpaid helper in household enterprises.  
Out of the total female heads in to labour force, majority of them, that is 42.6 percent of them are working as  
Own account workers in household enterprises, followed by Regular salaried employee, that 25.9 percent of  
them engaged in it. Whereas, into the casual work, almost 27 percent of them engaged in it. However, as an  
employer in the household enterprise, only 1.9 percent of them are involved.  
Table 4: Occupational Status of the Heads between Male and Female Headed Tribal Households  
Main Occupation (Heads)  
Male-Headed Households  
Female-Headed  
Households  
Frequency  
103  
Percentage  
26.0  
Frequency Percentage  
OwnAccountWorker (HH Ent)  
23  
22.1  
Page 1914  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Employer (HH Ent)  
Helper (HH Ent) (Unpaid HH Worker)  
Regular Salaried  
Casual Labour in Public work  
Casual labour in Other Types of Work  
Did not work but seeking and available for work  
Attended Domestic Duties and free collection of 17  
goods  
11  
2
81  
37  
19  
-
2.8  
.5  
20.2  
9.3  
4.8  
-
1
-
14  
10  
5
1.0  
-
13.5  
9.6  
4.8  
1.0  
32.7  
1
34  
4.3  
Rentiers, Pensioners, Remittances  
Not able to work due to disability  
Total  
122  
5
396  
30.8  
1.3  
100.0  
10  
6
104  
9.6  
5.8  
100.0  
Source: Authors’ Computations  
The gender wise comparison shows that there is no distinction between the different gender heads. This means  
that the pattern remains same across the genders. Meaning thereby, the biggest share of the heads is in the  
Rentier, Pensioners and Remittance Recipients, then followed by Own Account Workers and then Regular  
Salaried workers irrespective of the genders of the heads. Even Tehsil wise, it has been observed the same  
pattern of employment distribution majorly.  
Block wise Occupational Status of the Heads of the Tribal Households: The study generally found that there  
are three main categories as per occupation status is concerned and they are Self employment, Regular Salaried  
Employee and Casual Workers. However, there is another category which does not fall in the labour force  
category but rather not in labour force category that is Pensioners, Rentiers, Remittance Recipients, etc. Thus,  
these are four major categories where majority of the heads are engaged in. The study shows in Table 5, that  
among the blocks, the blocks which have highest share in the Self employment category, are Saspol, Khaltsi,  
Durbuk, Rong and Turtuk. Where as, the blocks like Rupsho and Nyoma have the highest share in Casual  
Worker category, and Chushot is the only block which has the highest share in  
Table 5: Block-wise Occupational Status of the Heads of Tribal Households  
Main  
Leh Block  
Chushot Block  
Thiksey Block  
Kharu Block  
Nimoo Block  
Occupati  
ons  
Freque Percent Freque Percent Freque Percent Freque Percent Freque Percent  
ncy  
age  
16.5  
ncy  
3
age  
15  
ncy  
6
age  
27.3  
ncy  
2
age  
9.1  
ncy  
2
age  
9.1  
OwnAcc 28  
ount  
Worker  
(HH Ent)  
Employe  
8
1
4.7  
.6  
1
-
5.0  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
9.1  
-
r
(HH  
Ent)  
Helper  
(HH Ent)  
(Unpaid  
HH  
Worker)  
Regular  
Salaried  
Casual  
Labour in  
Public  
40  
4
23.5  
2.4  
8
-
40.0  
-
1
1
4.5  
4.5  
3
3
13.6  
13.6  
4
1
18.2  
4.5  
work  
Page 1915  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Casual  
labour in  
Other  
Types of  
Work  
Did not -  
work but  
seeking  
11  
6.5  
-
2
-
10.0  
2
9.1  
1
4.5  
-
-
-
-
-
1
4.5  
-
-
and  
available  
for work  
Attended 18  
Domestic  
Duties  
10.6  
32.9  
-
-
3
9
13.6  
40.9  
9
3
40.9  
13.6  
4
9
18.2  
40.9  
and free  
collectio  
n
of  
goods  
Rentiers, 56  
Pensione  
rs,  
6
30.0  
Remittan  
ces  
not able 4  
to work  
2.4  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
due  
to  
disability  
Total  
170  
100.0  
20  
100.0  
22  
100.0  
22  
100.0  
22  
100.0  
Source: Authors’ Computations  
Table 5: Block-wise Occupational Status of the Heads of Tribal Households (Cont….)  
Main  
Occupations  
Saspol Block  
Skurbuchan  
Block  
Khalsti Block  
Durbuk Block  
Nyoma Block  
Freque Percent Freque Percent Freque Percent Freque Percent Freque Percent  
ncy  
6
age  
42.9  
ncy  
1
age  
5.0  
ncy  
19  
age  
57.6  
ncy  
7
age  
23.3  
ncy  
1
age  
4.8  
OwnAccount  
Worker (HH  
Ent)  
Employer  
(HH Ent)  
Helper (HH -  
Ent) (Unpaid  
HH Worker)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
4.8  
-
1
3.3  
Regular  
Salaried  
Casual  
2
14.3  
-
3
-
15.0  
-
9
3
27.3  
9.1  
4
4
13.3  
13.3  
3
14.3  
66.7  
-
14  
Labour  
in  
Public work  
Casual labour -  
-
1
5.0  
1
3.0  
3
10.0  
-
-
in  
Types  
Work  
Other  
of  
Page 1916  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Did not work -  
but seeking  
and available  
for work  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
4.8  
-
Attended  
Domestic  
Duties  
-
7
35.0  
4
13.3  
and  
free collection  
of goods  
Rentiers,  
Pensioners,  
Remittances  
not able to -  
work due to  
disability  
6
42.9  
-
8
40.0  
-
1
3.0  
-
7
23.3  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total  
14  
100.0  
20  
100.0  
33  
100.0  
30  
100.0  
22  
100.0  
Source: Authors’ Computations  
Regular Salaried Category. However, in the category of not in labour force, the Blocks like Leh, Thiksey,  
Nimoo, Saspol, Durbuk and Panamik have the highest share in the category of Rentiers, Pensioners,  
Remittance Recipients, etc. The main reason could be the age of the heads. The majority of the heads under  
this category, are mostly above 60 years.  
Table 5: Blockwise Occupational Status of the Heads of Tribal Households (Cont….)  
Main Occupations  
Rong  
BlockFreq  
(%)  
Rupsho  
BlockFreq  
(%)  
Diskit  
BlockFreq  
(%)  
Panamik  
BlockFreq (%) BlockFreq  
(%)  
Turtuk  
Own Account Worker (HH 18 (54.5%)  
Ent)  
3 (37.5%)  
16 (40%)  
2 (8.3%)  
12 (60%)  
Employer (HH Ent)  
Helper (HH Ent) (Unpaid  
HH Worker)  
Regular Salaried  
Casual Labour in Public  
Work  
11 (27.5%)  
1 (4.2%)  
5 (25%)  
2 (10%)  
10 (30.3%)  
5 (62.5%)  
Casual Labour in Other  
Types of Work  
Did not work but seeking  
and available for work  
Attended Domestic Duties 2 (6.1%)  
and free collection of  
goods  
2 (5%)  
1 (4.2%)  
3 (9.1%)  
4 (16.7%)  
Rentiers, Pensioners,  
Remittances  
Not able to work due to  
disability  
11 (27.5%)  
13 (54.2%)  
3 (12.5%)  
24 (100%)  
1 (5%)  
Total  
14 (100%)  
20 (100%)  
33 (100%)  
20 (100%)  
Source: Authors’ Computations  
Page 1917  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Policy Suggestions: Based on the findings, policy interventions must be tailored to address the diverse  
employment patterns among tribal household heads in the Ladakh region.  
Firstly, given the high incidence of self-employment, particularly own-account work, there is a need for  
targeted skill development programs, access to credit, and market linkages to support sustainable micro-  
entrepreneurship. In rural areas, where income from pensions, and remittances dominates, social security  
schemes and pension portability can enhance financial resilience, especially for the elderly and vulnerable  
groups.  
Secondly, for the sizable section of tribal heads engaged in casual labour, formalising informal work through  
social protection coverage, minimum wage enforcement, and livelihood diversification schemes is crucial.  
Thirdly, in urban centres, where regular salaried employment is more prevalent, expanding reservation in  
public and private sectors for tribal communities and offering upskilling opportunities can improve job quality.  
Additionally, strengthening rural-urban employment transitions through vocational training and job placement  
services will ensure better mobility and adaptability.  
Lastly, the region-specific policies that factor in Ladakh’s geographic remoteness and harsh climatic conditions  
are essential for inclusive economic planning. Overall, a multidimensional livelihood strategy that combines  
economic support, capacity building, and institutional backing can promote sustainable employment and  
reduce livelihood vulnerabilities among tribal heads in the region particularly Leh district.  
REFERENCES  
1. Aram, M, (1972) The Emerging Situation in Nagaland and Some Suggestions for Natural Policy. In:  
Singh K S (ed.) Tribal Situation in India. Shimla, India: Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, pp. 125-  
129.  
2. Choudhary, M (2013) A detailed study of Micro Finance as a tool for Tribal Transformation in areas of  
Madhya Pradesh, International Journal of Business and Management Invention, Volume 2 Issue 3,  
PP.72-76  
3. Kundu, S (2024), The Role of Tribal Women in the Local Economy: A Study of Livelihood and  
Employment Patterns, IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396, Vol-10 Issue-1  
4. Islam, M & Rai, R.A. (2014) Manpower potential, employment status and Forest Based livelihood  
opportunities among tribal communities of Jharkhand India, Journal of Human Ecology 47 (3), PP. 305-  
315  
5. Mehta, G et al (2022) Determinants of Livelihood Diversification: A Case Study of Tribal Households in  
Kinnaur District of Himachal Pradesh, Indian Journal of Ecology (2022) 49(1): 273-276 DOI:  
6. Marchang, R (2019) Economic, Occupational and Livelihood Changes of Scheduled Tribes of North East  
India, Working Paper, ISBN 978-81-7791-298-2, The Institute for Social and Economic Change,  
Bangalore  
7. Oraon, V (2012) Changing Pattern of Tribal Livelihoods: A Case study in Sundargarh District, Odisha.  
M.A. Thesis, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, India  
8. Satpati, S and Sharma K.K. (2021) Livelihood options and livelihood security among tribal in South  
Western plateau and highland region in West Bengal, Journal of Land and Rural Studies, Volume 9, pp  
119-139.  
9. Sreekutty, M.J. & Joseph, M.K. (2021) Livelihood Diversification: Insights and Policy Implications For  
Tribal Communities, International Journal for Creative Research Thoughts, Volume 9, Issue 12  
10. Suryanarayana, C. (1983) Achievements of Integrated Tribal Development Programme, Kurukshetra, Vol  
31, Issue 9, PP 17-18.  
Page 1918