INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
CONCLUSION
Advertising remains one of the most powerful cultural forces shaping societal perceptions, identities and
aspirations. Within contemporary consumer culture, its persuasive power extends beyond mere product
promotion, actively constructing and reinforcing social norms, including those related to gender, beauty and
bodily value. This study has demonstrated that fairness cream advertisements reproduce a deeply entrenched
colorist ideology that privileges lighter skin tones as symbols of beauty, success and modernity. Through the
lens of semiotics, it becomes evident that these advertisements are not neutral aesthetic representations but
ideological texts that encode and circulate dominant cultural myths.
Across the corpus examined, fairness cream advertisements consistently rely on a narrow and exclusionary
standard of beauty anchored in the valorization of fair skin. Whether through visual metaphors of brightness,
upward mobility and transformation or linguistic framing that presents darker skin as a deficit requiring
“correction,” these advertisements perpetuate a hegemonic beauty discourse that aligns with long-standing social
hierarchies in South Asian contexts. Such portrayals reinforce colorism as an internal system of discrimination
privileging lighter skin over darker shades which is deeply rooted in South Asian histories of caste, colonialism
and globalized beauty capitalism (Glenn, 2008). By repeatedly coding fairness as synonymous with desirability,
confidence and success, these advertisements sustain a symbolic violence that disproportionately affects women.
The psychological and social implications of these beauty messages are significant. Research consistently links
exposure to idealized advertising imagery with increased body dissatisfaction, reduced self-esteem and
heightened appearance anxiety among women (Grabe, Ward & Hyde, 2008; Craft & Cone, 2014). Although
much of the empirical literature has focused on weight, body shape or youthfulness, parallel mechanisms operate
in fairness cream advertising. Fairness is framed as both a problem and a solution: dark skin is problematized
through negative depictions like sadness, rejection, social exclusion while fair skin is presented as the key to
acceptance, opportunity and romantic desirability. This echoes Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) which argues
that women internalize unrealistic beauty ideals, leading to chronic appearance monitoring and self-
objectification. In fairness advertising, the “thin ideal” is replaced by a “fairness ideal” that functions, similarly,
generating pressure for women to modify their natural appearance to meet manufactured standards of worth.
This study also reveals how the semiotic mechanisms embedded in fairness advertisements operate at two levels
of meaning, following Barthes (1972). At the denotative level, viewers encounter images of women using
creams, smiling or undergoing visible “improvements.” At the connotative level, these same images
communicate culturally coded messages: fair skin symbolizes professionalism, marriageability, sophistication
and moral purity while darker skin is framed as a barrier to social success. The advertisements’ reliance on
“before and after” narratives, visual motifs of radiance and celebrity endorsements amplify these connotations,
making the underlying ideology appear natural, inevitable and aspirational.
Gendered expectations further intensify the impact of these messages. The overwhelming majority of fairness
cream advertisements explicitly or implicitly target women, constructing femininity as contingent on meeting
externally imposed aesthetic standards. These ads exploit patriarchal insecurities such as marital prospects,
family honor and professional acceptability, subtly reinforcing the notion that the social value of women is tied
to their physical appearance. Iqbal (2014) suggests such portrayals reproduce a gendered hierarchy in which
women must labour emotionally and financially to maintain marketable beauty, while men remain largely
exempt from such scrutiny.
Moreover, fairness advertising cannot be divorced from larger sociohistorical narratives. The valorization of
light skin reflects colonial legacies that elevated European features, as well as local caste-based hierarchies
associated with purity, class and labour (Parameswaran & Cardoza, 2009). By positioning fairness creams as
tools for personal transformation and upward mobility, advertisements capitalize on these historical inequalities,
presenting light skin as both an attainable goal and an indicator of social capital. This interplay between
postcolonial identity, aspirational modernity and globalized commercial beauty culture contributes to the
pervasive normalization of colorism in India.
Page 2145