INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2733
www.rsisinternational.org
Development of Lightning Detection for a Low-Cost System in
Malacca
Norbayah Yusop
1*
, Muhammad Zulfarhan Mohd Sabri
2
, Mohd Riduan Ahmad
1
and Muhammad Haziq
Muhammad Sabri
3
1
Centre of Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction (CDR), Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan
Elektronik dan Komputer, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, Durian
Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
2
SanDisk Storage Malaysia Sdn, Plot 301A, Persiaran Cassia Selatan 1, 14110 Simpang Ampat, Pulau
Pinang
3
Department of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan
*
Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100217
Received: 24 November 2025; Accepted: 30 November 2025; Published: 05 December 2025
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the development of a low-cost lightning detection system, addressing the limitation of
existing systems that are typically expensive. The aim was to design a low-cost lightning detection system to
accurately capture lightning flashes within the frequency range of 1Hz to 10MHz. The lightning detection system
was fully assembled using a Fast Field buffer circuit integrated with a parallel-plate antenna to ensure accurate
detection of lightning flashes. The system successfully detected a total of 60 negative cloud-to-ground (-CG)
flashes and 51 intra-cloud (IC) flashes on 11 July 2023 between 01:32:00 and 08:3:00. Analysis of the –CG
flashes indicates that the majority of 54 flashes consisted of single return strokes, while only 6 flashes exhibited
subsequent return strokes which 4 flashes with two subsequent return strokes and 2 with three subsequent return
strokes, respectively. The developed system achieved an 83% consistency in identifying lightning flashes when
comparing with an existing lightning detection system, demonstrating its potential as a low-cost yet reliable
alternative.
Keywords: Lightning Flashes, Fast Field, Electric field, return stroke
INTRODUCTION
Lightning is a phenomenon that produces extraordinary power (Mansoor et al., 2021). Lightning also has the
potential to destroy and pose a major threat to public safety. With its ability to cause severe damage to electrical
power devices (Kadir et al., 2023), injury to people (Christophides, 2017) and lead to casualties, and even destroy
homes. Lightning can be defined as the occurrence of a high voltage between the Earth and the clouds, resulting
in the acceleration of stray electrons in the air. These accelerated electrons acquire sufficient kinetic energy to
dislodge electrons from atoms in the surrounding air, causing a transient and high-current electric discharge. The
path length of lightning discharges is typically measured in kilometers. Another definition of lightning is an
electrical discharge taking the form of a spark within a cloud that is charged (Kostinskiy et al., 2016). A typical
lightning strike is composed of three to four strokes, although it can involve more. Each re-strike is separated by
a relatively long-time interval, usually around 40 to 50 milliseconds (Rodriguez-Sanabria, 2005).
Lightning can be classified into various types which are cloud-to-cloud (CC), intra-cloud (IC), cloud-to-ground
(CG). When focusing on the CG, further classification can be based on polarity, resulting in downward negative
lightning, upward negative lightning, downward positive lightning, and upward positive lightning (Kalair, 2013;
Shivalli, 2016). It can also be divided into positive (+CG) and negative (-CG) cloud-to-ground based on the
polarity. Many studies have been conducted in various geographic regions found that around 10% of global CG
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2734
www.rsisinternational.org
lightning is positive (Cooray et al., 1982; Rakov, 2003; Schumann and Saba, 2012; Uman, 2012; Romero et al.,
2013; Mohammad et al., 2022; Herrera et al., 2018). The CC lightning refers to lightning discharges that occur
between different clouds, where each cloud carries opposite charges without directly contacting the ground. IC
lightning, on the other hand, takes place within the same cloud or inside the cloud and involves interactions
between areas of opposite charge. The CG lightning involves a discharge between a cloud and the ground, where
ions from the cloud are discharged and strike the ground. This type of lightning can involve a positive charge
from the cloud hitting a negative charge on the ground.
The cost of existing lightning detection systems is quite expensive. The existing system uses high-cost
components, and specialized sensors that can detect electromagnetic pulses associated with lightning (Adzhiev,
2013; Bitzer, 2015). Although these advanced systems provide accurate tracking and location capabilities, but
the cost were still expensive. This creates a demand for the development of alternative solutions that offer
comparable accuracy and reliability at a more affordable price point. By addressing cost issues and proposing
low-cost lightning detection systems, lightning detection becomes more accessible to a wider variety of users
and industries. Such a system would use cost-effective components and technology and ensure accurate lightning
detection. To overcome the high cost of existing lightning detection systems and monitor lightning events, the
development of low-cost alternatives may provide a solution.
This paper aims to design a low-cost lightning detection system by leveraging cost-effective components and
technology without compromising accuracy and reliability. By utilizing affordable components such a system
can detect and track lightning events effectively. For instance, instead of relying solely on specialized sensors,
the system can make use of existing infrastructure, such as antenna to capture electromagnetic pulses associated
with lightning. By addressing the cost barriers, a low-cost lightning detection system can make lightning
monitoring more accessible to a broader range of industries, ensuring the safety and security of aviation, outdoor
environments, and public welfare during thunderstorms.
METHODOLOGY
Lightning Measurement Setup
The process of designing the lightning detection system involved assembling several components such as
antenna, coaxial cable, Fast Field buffer circuit, Pico Scope, and laptop as shown in Figure 1. A parallel plate
antenna constructed using metallic material have been used for lightning detection. The antenna used in this
design had a capacitance of 59pF. The designed antenna was linked to the buffer circuit through a short 60cm
coaxial cable with a 50Ω impedance to establish the connectivity. The capacitance of the coaxial cable is 60pF.
Subsequently, the buffer circuit was connected to the Pico Scope via a longer coaxial cable, and the Pico Scope
was interfaced with the laptop. Upon triggering by lightning flashes, the system collected and stored all the data
within the Pico Scope software for further analysis and evaluation. The result analysis obtain from the new
system will be label as FF2. Then, the result will be compare with the existing system will label as FF1. Figure
2 displays an example signal of –CG flashes captured by FF1 and FF2 system. The Pico Scope allows both
channels to be displayed at the same time with channel A producing the blue signal and channel B producing the
red signal.
Figure 1. The configuration of the lightning detection system
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2735
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 2. Example signal of –CG flashes captured by FF1 and FF2 system
The installation setup of a comprehensive lightning detection system was done in real time measurement at the
rooftop UTeM building. This emphasizing key considerations such as accessibility, unobstructed exposure to the
open sky and the absence of significant barriers that might impede detection accuracy. The setup entails the
meticulous installation of a lightning detection system comprising a parallel plate antenna, a fast field buffer
circuit, and a coaxial cable. Each component was methodically positioned and configured to ensure optimal
functionality and accurate lightning detection. Strategic placement of lightning detection system across the
rooftop was executed to maximize coverage area. Many factors such as the field of view, elevation angles, and
line of sight were carefully evaluated to enhance the system's detection capabilities. This placement aimed to
optimize the system's ability to capture lightning signals effectively. Figure 3 shows the installation setup for the
lightning system in real time measurement at the rooftop. This setup was designed with thorough consideration
of various environmental and technical factors to enable precise and comprehensive lightning detection.
Figure 3. Installation setup for the lightning system in real time measurement
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This section will present the results and discussion obtained from the development of lightning detection system.
The signal received will be process and analyse throughout the observation. Then, the results will be compared
with the other existing lightning system available in UTeM.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2736
www.rsisinternational.org
The type of lightning flashes
The results obtained shows a total of 111 lightning flashes were detected using the low-cost lightning detection
system. These lightning flashes were detected within a small radius of topical thunderstorms in Malacca,
Malaysia (UTeM). The entire dataset has been analysed and categorized into several types of lightning such as -
CG and IC flashes. The identification of the flash type was based on the recorded fast electric field change. The
recorded data includes 60 -CG and 51 IC lightning flashes as shown in Figure 4. The separated data comprises
the selected data with a strong flash signal. Majority of the -CG flashes were found to have a single strokes and
others consisted of two or more return strokes. In detail, out of the 60 recorded –CG flashes, 54 were single
return strokes, 4 consisted of two subsequent return strokes, and 2 had three subsequent return strokes. Figure 5
illustrates the number of strokes for -CG flashes.
Figure 4. The types of lightning flashes captured by the lightning system
Figure 5. Distribution of the number of strokes per flash for -CG flashes
The return stroke of the (-CG) lightning flashes
Figure 6 shows the characteristics of a return stroke captured on July 11, 2023, from 01:32:00 to 08:30:00. The
results indicate three characteristics of –CG flashes were recorded a single return stroke, two return strokes, and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2737
www.rsisinternational.org
three return strokes. Each flash exhibits its own signal pattern. As shown in Figure 6(a), the process begins with
an initial breakdown pulse (or preliminary breakdown pulse), followed by a stepped leader and a return stroke.
In Figure 6(b), the same process occurs, but the signal contains two repeated return strokes, classified as a –CG
flash with two subsequent return strokes. Figure 6(c) shows a signal with three repeated return strokes, classified
as a –CG flash with three subsequent return strokes.
Figure 6. The return stroke captured by the lightning system (a) -CG flashes (b) -CG flashes with two return
strokes and (c) -CG with three return strokes.
The comparison of return stroke captured by the lightning systems FF1 and FF2
Figure 7-9 illustrates the comparison of return strokes captured by the lightning system FF1 and FF2 for –CG
flashes with a single return stroke, two and three return strokes. Analysis of the –CG flashes indicates that the
majority of 54 flashes consisted of single return strokes, while only 6 flashes exhibited subsequent return strokes
which 4 flashes with two subsequent return strokes and 2 with three subsequent return strokes, respectively. The
similarity of lightning flashes between two lightning systems FF1 and FF2 as shown in Figure 9. Both of the
systems have their own performance because both use different type of ICs. The FF1 system using OPA633
which is a high-speed, current-feedback op-amp that's often used in applications requiring wide bandwidth and
high slew rates, while the FF2 system using BUF634 is a high-current buffer amplifier designed to provide high
output current with low distortion. Due to that, the similarity in terms of performance may have quite a
difference. Similar measurement applies to both systems to quantify how related or close data samples are to
each other. The similarity measure is usually expressed as a numerical value, typically between 0 and 1, where
0 represents low similarity (dissimilar data objects) and 1 represents high similarity (very similar data objects).
The analysis of 60 flashes results in a mean similarity value of 0.8266. This indicates similarity performance
achieved in the 60 flashes was around 83%. Through the analysis obtained, 0.9936 maximum similarity was
achieved while minimum similarity is 0.7149. The parameter of similarity between system FF1 and FF2 as
shown in Table 1.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2738
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 7. Negative cloud-to-ground flashes with a single return stroke
Figure 8. Negative cloud-to-ground flashes with two return strokes
Figure 9. Negative cloud-to-ground flashes with three return strokes
Figure 9: The similarity of lightning flashes between FF1 and FF2
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2739
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 1: Parameter of similarity between FF1 and FF2
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Median
Third Quartile
Similarity
0.7149
0.9936
0.8266
0.7971
0.8461
CONCLUSION
As conclusion, the project has been achieved and fully met where the lightning detection system has been
designed and tested functionally to detect the lightning flashes on 11 July 2023. The lightning system capable to
detected 60 -CG and 51 IC lightning flashes between 1:32:00 and 8:30:00. Three different characteristics of
CG flashes were recorded consists of 54 flashes a single return strokes, 4 with two subsequent return strokes and
2 with three subsequent return strokes, respectively. According to the analysis, the comparative analysis between
the new and existing lightning detection systems revealed an 83% similarity in lightning flash detection
capability. Despite these variations, the new development system proves capable of detecting similar types of
lightning flashes -CG and IC, showcasing potential cost-effectiveness without compromising crucial detection
capabilities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by Faculty of Electronics and Computer
Technology and Engineering (FTKEK), Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) for the opportunity,
support and resources. This project also is part of the output UTeM Short Term Grant
PJP/2020/FKEKK/PP/S01761.
REFERENCES
1. Adzhiev, A. Kh., Stasenko, V. N. & Tapaskhanov, V. O. (2013). Lightning detection system in the North
Caucasus. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology. Volume 38, pages 1–5.
2. Bitzer, P. M., Burchfield, J. C. and Christian, H. J. (2016). A Bayesian Approach to Assess the
Performance of Lightning Detection Systems. American Meteorological Society Page(s): 563–578. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0032.1
3. Christophides, T., Bogle, R. and Fayed, H. (2017). Cardiac Effects of Lightning Strikes. Arrhythmia &
Electrophysiology Review 6(3):114. DOI:10.15420/aer.2017:7:3
4. Cooray, V. and S. Lundquist, S. (1982). On the characteristics of some radiation fields from lightning and
their possible origin in positive ground flashes. Journal of Geophysical Research. vol. 87, no. C13, p.
11203. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc087ic13p11203
5. Herrera, J., Younes, C. and Porras, L. (2018). Cloud-to-ground lightning activity in Colombia: A 14-year
study using lightning location system data. Atmospheric Research, vol. 203, pp. 164–174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.12.009
6. Kadir, M. Z. A. Ab, Misbah, N. R., Gomes, C., Jasni, J., Wan Ahmad, W. F., Hassan, M. K. (2012).
Recent statistics on lightning fatalities in Malaysia. International Conference on Lightning Protection
7. (ICLP). 10 November 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2012.6344337
8. Kalair, A., Abas, N. and Khan, N. (2013). Lightning Interactions with Humans and Lifelines. Journal of
Lightning Research, 2013, 5, 11-28.
9. Kostinskiy, A. Y., Syssoev, V. S., Bogatov, N. A., Mareev, E. A., Andreev, M. G., Bulatov, M. U.,
Makal'sky, L. M., Sukharevsky, D. I., Rakov, V. A. (2016). Observations of the connection of positive
and negative leaders in meter-scale electric discharges generated by clouds of negatively charged water
droplets. Atmospheres. 15 August 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025079.
10. Mansoor, V.M. Nagaveni, P., Amudha, A., Divyapriya, S., Emayavaramban, G., Siva Ramkumar, M.,
SivaramKrishnan, M. (2021). Throwing light on lightning. Materialstoday: Proceedings. Volume 37, Part
2, 2021, Pages 2572-2577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.500
11. Mohammad, S. A., Ahmad, M. R., Abdullah, M., Sangjong, P., Shamsul Ammar Shamsul Baharin, S. A.
S, Yusop, N., Lu, G. and Cooray, V. (2022). Characteristics of lightning electromagnetic fields produced
by antarctica storms. Atmosphere. vol. 13, no. 4, p. 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040588
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2740
www.rsisinternational.org
12. Rakov, V. A. (2003). A review of positive and bipolar lightning discharges. Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-6-767
13. Romero, C., Rachidi, F., Rubinstein, M., Paolone, M., Rakov, V. A. and D. Pavanello, D. (2013). Positive
lightning flashes recorded on the Säntis tower from May 2010 to January 2012. Journal of Geophysical
Research Atmospheres, vol. 118, no. 23, pp. 12,87912,892. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020242
14. Schumann, C. and Saba, M. M. F. (2012). Continuing current intensity in positive ground flashes.
15. International Conference on Lightning Protection, ICLP 2012, Sep.2012,pp.1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2012.6344260
16. Shivalli, S. (2016). Lightning Phenomenon, Effects and Protection of Structures from Lightning. IOSR
Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE) Volume 11, Issue 3Ver. I (May. Jun.
2016), PP 44-50. https://doi.org/10.9790/1676-1103014450
17. Uman, M. A. (2012). The lightning discharges. Courier Dover Publications, NY, USA: Mineola.