INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2741
www.rsisinternational.org
Development and Testing of a Real-Time IoT Monitoring System for
Aquaponic Farming
Najwan Khambari*
1
, Nurul Fakhirah Azlan
1
, Nor Azman Mat Ariff
1
, Shahkhir Mozamir
1
, Norharyati
Harum
1
, Wahidah Md Shah
1
, Bogdan Ghita
2
1
Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia
2
School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100218
Received: 24 November 2025; Accepted: 30 November 2025; Published: 05 December 2025
ABSTRACT
Aquaponics offers a sustainable approach to agriculture by integrating aquaculture and hydroponics, using fish
waste as nutrients for plant growth and plants as natural filters for water recirculation. Despite its ecological
advantages, maintaining optimal environmental conditions within aquaponic systems remains a significant
challenge due to the need for continuous manual monitoring and adjustment. This study aims to address this
issue by developing an Internet of Things (IoT)-based monitoring system to automate and optimize key
environmental parameters critical to aquaponic farming, namely water temperature, pH levels, and water levels.
The system utilizes an ESP32 microcontroller integrated with cost-effective sensors, a local web interface for
data visualization, and a real-time alert mechanism via Telegram messaging. A pilot deployment was conducted,
and usability was evaluated through the System Usability Scale (SUS) with 19 aquaponic practitioners. The
system achieved a SUS score of 77.11%, indicating a "Good" usability rating. Sensor data was successfully
transmitted at two-minute intervals, with real-time alerts triggered when thresholds were exceeded. The results
demonstrate that the proposed system is not only technically feasible and user-friendly but also contributes to
sustainable agriculture by reducing manual labor and enabling proactive intervention. The study supports the
adoption of IoT in small- to medium-scale aquaponic farms, aligning with global efforts toward SDG 2 (Zero
Hunger), SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).
Keywords: Aquaponics, ESP32, Internet of Things (IoT), Monitoring system, System Usability Scale (SUS)
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the combination of population growth and environmental concerns led to a substantial expansion
of research aiming to address global food security challenges [1, 2, 3]. The increasing demand for water
resources, along with the reduced availability of land, has prompted the development of many innovative and
complex food production methods, with aquaponics being one of them [2]. Technological advancements,
particularly the introduction and integration of IoT and sensors into aquaponic systems, present a transformative
opportunity to explore the potential of IoT-enabled solutions to address the operational challenges and maximize
the potential of aquaponic systems for better yield. Recent studies have highlighted the growing role of
automated systems, integrated feeders, and predictive models in aquaponic management, improving
sustainability and productivity [37], [38], [39].
Aquaponics is a sustainable agricultural method that integrates aquaculture and hydroponics [4]. It represents a
closed loop system in food production. In this system, fish are fed and raised in tanks where they produce waste
rich in ammonia (NH4) which is harmful to the fish. The water containing this waste is then pumped into a grow
bed where plants, typically leafy greens, and herbs, are cultivated. Beneficial bacteria that are present in the grow
bed act as a catalyst [5, 6] to establish a self-sustaining ecosystem which converts the ammonia into nitrates
(NO3) [7]. This process serves essential nutrients for plants. As the plants absorb these nutrients, they act as a
natural filter that purifies the water, which can then be returned to the fish tanks. This cycle, shown in Figure 1,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2742
www.rsisinternational.org
creates a self-sustaining ecosystem where both the fish and plants thrive. This also eliminates any introduction
of any chemical-based substance which can be harmful to the environment, as is the case for hydroponics [8].
An aquaponics system is designed to replicate the whole natural ecosystem that makes them organic [9] as shown
in Figure 1; one of the regulating factors is the pH value, which must remain neutral (6.8 8.0) for the system
to remain in balance [10]. The aquaponics system is well-suited for urban environments that have limited land
because it can be set up in warehouses, rooftops, or abandoned buildings. While land is not a requirement, a
significant drawback of aquaponics systems is the considerable time required for monitoring and adjusting
parameters to meet predetermined levels [3].
In response to the growing significance of aquaponics, this paper explores the design and implementation of an
Internet of Things (IoT) based monitoring system that maximizes the productivity of aquaponic systems. With a
focus on real-time parameter monitoring of water temperature, pH levels, and water level, the system aims to
provide valuable insights into the dynamic interactions within the aquaponic ecosystem for proactive
management and optimization.
Moreover, aquaponics aligns with several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly
SDG 2: Zero Hunger, SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, and SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and
Production. By integrating IoT technologies into aquaponics, this work does not only address the technological
challenges of modern agriculture but also contributes to the creation of more sustainable, efficient, and resilient
food systems, especially in urban and resource-constrained environments.
From a socio-technical perspective, the adoption of IoT systems in agriculture is influenced not only by cost and
efficiency but also by perceived ease of use, accessibility, and support for local livelihoods. The Unified Theory
of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model posits that performance expectancy and effort
expectancy significantly impact user adoption of new technologies in rural settings [34]. This aligns with
Malaysia’s commitment to advancing SDG 2, 6, and 12 through technology-driven smart agriculture, as detailed
in the Malaysia SDG VNR Report 2021 [35]. Moreover, the World Bank emphasizes that integrating digital
tools into agriculture can enhance food security and economic resilience among underserved farming
communities [36].
Fig. 1 A cycle in an aquaponic system
As outlined in Figure 1, an aquaponic system requires a balanced interaction between its components, which can
be achieved through monitoring the encompassing environmental conditions. The main parameters that define
an aquaponic ecosystem are as follows: pH, temperature, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Electrical Conductivity (EC),
Ammonia (NH4), Nitrite (NO2-) and Nitrate (NO3-) [11]. Each one of these parameters plays a pivotal role in
maintaining optimal conditions for the health and growth of both aquatic species and plants within the system
and significant deviation in any of them will lead to a failure of the system.
pH is one of the aggregating indicators for the environment. It quantifies the concentration of hydrogen ions
(H+) in a solution to determine its acidity or alkalinity. This significantly affects the biological processes within
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2743
www.rsisinternational.org
the system, as different fish and plant species thrive under specific pH conditions. The suitable pH range for the
growth and survival of plants and fish inside the system is between 6.5-8 [12], with the nitrification process
occurring where the value of pH is between 7.0 and 9.0 [13]. The pH can be controlled through the addition of
lime (CaCO3) or sodium hydroxide (NaOH); a low pH will lead to high levels of dissolved carbon dioxide
(CO2), which is toxic to fish [14]. Similarly, temperature regulation is also vital for aquaponic systems as it
impacts the metabolic rates of fish and plant growth [15]. Maintaining a stable water temperature within the
range of 22°C to 32°C is essential for ensuring the well-being of both fish and plants [16]. Although an aquaponic
system can tolerate a temperature range of 15°C to 35°C [10], it is best to keep the water temperature at an
average of 26 °C, which ensures a balance between the fish and plants populations [17]. Finally, Electrical
Conductivity (EC) expressed as the concentration of dissolved ions in the water and influenced by the
concentration of dissolved salts and minerals, is a measure of the water's ability to conduct electricity [11] The
optimum EC range for fish is 100-2000 µS/cm, but the ecosystem can function within a wider range (30-5000
µS/cm) [18]. Polluted water will have higher levels of EC indicate and may cause death to the fish population
[13].
Previous Work
A considerable amount of literature has been published on IoT-based aquaponic monitoring systems with
different number of parameters to monitor [3]. Sensors are connected to a microcontroller that are either
Arduino-based (Arduino Uno, ESP8266 or ESP32) [6, 11, 12, 15, 19-23] or a Raspberry Pi [10, 24, 26]. These
microcontrollers then relay the readings from the sensors via wireless networks mainly through WiFi to be
displayed to the users. Some previous studies also considered using LoRa [11, 23, 25] especially for sparse
network connectivity environments, such as farms located in rural areas where network coverage is difficult to
deploy, given that LoRa is capable to transmit data in a long range communication while keeping very little
power usage [26]. The relayed information being displayed to the users are usually privately hosted with their
own database [10, 20, 23] or on an IoT platform such as Blynk [19, 27], Favoriot [12] or Amazon Web Services
(AWS) [6, 21] to provide tools and services to facilitate the development, deployment, and management of IoT
applications. In rural areas and off-grid situations, integrating solar power for aquaponics monitoring system
was also considered [28]. In addition, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) were included in
the ecosystem to optimize water treatment and monitoring applications [25], data visualization tools and smart
health monitoring [29] and aquaponics yield estimation [30]. Table 1 shows a summary of previous work that
has used microcontrollers in the aquaponic monitoring system.
TABLE I: Summary of the previous work in aquaponicmonitoring system with IoT
Article
Gateway
Media
Middleware and Storage
6
Arduino
Wi-Fi
AWS
10
Raspberry Pi
Wi-Fi
Personal platform
11
Arduino
Lora
Personal platform
12
Arduino
Wi-Fi
Favoriot
15
Arduino
Wi-Fi
Personal platform
19
Arduino
Wi-Fi
Blynk
20
Arduino
Wi-Fi
Personal platform
21
Arduino
Wi-Fi
AWS
23
Arduino
Lora
Personal platform
24
Raspberry Pi
Wi-Fi
Personal platform
26
Raspberry Pi
Wi-Fi
Thingspeak
27
Arduino
Wi-Fi
Blynk
Method And Design Implementation
This paper presents an aquaponic farm monitoring platform that aims to enhance the efficiency and productivity
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2744
www.rsisinternational.org
of aquaponic environments in while being cost-effective. This is done by monitoring basic important parameters
which are water temperature, water levels and pH levels. Similar to other IoT-enabled systems using ESP32 or
Arduino microcontrollers, the proposed design collects and transmits sensor data efficiently while allowing
integration with automated feeders and water quality predictors [38], [40], [41]. These data are then sent to a
database which will also be displayed on a dashboard. A notification will be sent to users via Telegram if readings
from the sensors exceed the threshold set for each parameter.
Hardware Design and Implementation
The monitoring system includes a microcontroller ESP32, waterproof probe DS18B20 1-Wire temperature
sensor, HC-SR04 ultrasonic sensor and a liquid pH value detection sensor with electrode probe. The hardware
design circuit is shown in Figure 2. ESP32 which acts as a microcontroller, is used to connect and collect data
from sensors measuring pH, water level, temperature, and humidity. The data is sent to a local database where it
will be stored and displayed on a website, as well as compared to a set threshold to determine whether the current
conditions are within a safe range.
Fig. 2 Hardware implementation of the aquaponic system
Figure 3 shows the prototype of the aquaponic monitoring system being tested in a real environment. Once the
ESP32 microcontroller is powered, all sensors will start the monitoring process immediately. The data will be
sent to a database every two minutes.
Fig. 3 Testing the prototype of aquaponic monitoring system
TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The test phase comprises performance testing and system usability testing. During the performance testing, the
IoT-based monitoring system is used to capture the readings of the various sensors and configurations to
determine its accuracy and reliability in monitoring an aquaponic system. For the system usability testing, 19
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2745
www.rsisinternational.org
aquaponics farmers and users were asked to evaluate the system to assess its effectiveness, efficiency, and user
satisfaction.
Performance Test
Tests were conducted to assess the efficacy of the sensors. The sensor readings are systematically gathered and
transmitted to a centralized database. These datasets hold significant value, serving as a repository of historical
parameter readings essential for anomaly detection. Moreover, automated alerts are generated and dispatched to
users in instances where sensor readings trigger predetermined thresholds. The visualization of data is facilitated
through a web-based monitoring interface. An illustrative example of the current real-time data display on the
dashboard is provided in Figure 4.
Fig. 4 Monitored data on dashboard
Within the dashboard interface, users have the flexibility to customize their data viewing preferences. They can
choose to select from a range of options, including accessing the most recent 15, 30, or the overall historical
readings stored within the database. Figure 5 illustrates the user interface design, showcasing the various options
available for data viewing selection.
Fig. 5 Data viewing options
When a parameter is not within a safe range, a notification will be sent to users to notify the current situation via
Telegram. Figure 6 is the example on how the notifications are sent to users.
Fig. 6 Notifications sent to users on unsafe parameters detection
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2746
www.rsisinternational.org
Usability Test
The System Usability Scale (SUS) [31] provides a straightforward and effective approach to evaluating the
usability of products and designs. Similar usability testing methods for measuring user satisfaction can be seen
in other journal papers by several authors [32][33]. For this testing method, feedback from 19 respondents has
been obtained to evaluate the developed system.
Table 2 provides analysis of System Usability Scale (SUS) data obtained from 19 respondents. Each respondent,
question, raw score and final score is denoted by 'R’, 'Q', 'RS' and 'FS' respectively. The developed system
attained a final SUS score of 77.11% which falls in the “Good” SUS adjective rating that indicates users generally
find the system easy to use and are satisfied with its functionality.
TABLE II: Data collection from the conducted SUS Test
R
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
SUS Score
1
4
2
4
1
4
2
3
2
4
1
77.50
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
3
4
1
75.00
3
4
3
4
2
3
2
4
1
4
2
72.50
4
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
1
4
3
75.00
5
4
1
4
2
4
2
2
3
5
2
72.50
6
3
1
3
2
4
1
4
2
5
2
77.50
7
5
2
3
2
3
1
5
1
5
2
82.50
8
4
1
4
1
4
1
3
1
3
3
77.50
9
5
3
5
2
4
1
4
1
4
2
82.50
10
5
2
4
3
4
3
4
3
5
2
72.50
11
4
2
4
2
4
2
5
2
5
2
80.00
12
4
2
5
3
5
2
4
2
4
2
77.50
13
3
2
4
2
4
2
3
1
4
3
70.00
14
4
2
4
3
5
2
4
1
4
1
80.00
15
4
1
4
2
3
1
3
1
5
1
82.50
16
4
2
4
3
4
3
5
1
4
2
75.00
17
4
2
3
1
5
1
5
3
4
2
80.00
18
5
2
5
1
3
2
3
2
4
2
77.50
19
4
3
5
2
5
1
3
2
3
1
77.50
Average score
77.11
Comparison with Existing Systems and Contributions
To better evaluate the effectiveness and novelty of the proposed system, a comparison with related works is
presented in Table 3. The comparison focuses on key implementation aspects such as the microcontroller used,
types of sensors, communication protocols, user alert mechanisms, usability evaluation, and data access
platforms.
TABLE III: Comparison of the proposed system with selected previous works
Feature
[12] Favoriot IoT
[19] Blynk Platform
[6] AWS-based
Proposed System
Microcontroller
Arduino
Arduino
Arduino
ESP32 NodeMCU
Sensor Types
Temp, Hum, pH
Temp, Hum, Soil
Moisture
Temp, Flow,
Light, pH
pH, Temp, Water Level
Platform
Favoriot
Blynk
AWS
Local web + Telegram
Notification Mechanism
None
None
Email/AWS
Telegram Alert
Usability Evaluation
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
SUS Score = 77.11%
Update Interval
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Every 2 minutes
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2747
www.rsisinternational.org
Compared to [12], which utilized Favoriot and did not implement real-time alerts or usability evaluation, the
proposed system integrates Telegram messaging, providing timely alerts when sensor readings exceed safe
thresholds. Similarly, although [19] employed Blynk for remote monitoring, the system lacked a usability
assessment, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction or effectiveness. Meanwhile, [6] used AWS for cloud
storage and management but introduced more complex infrastructure not easily replicable in small-scale or
educational environments.
Furthermore, the proposed system uses the ESP32 microcontroller, which offers built-in Wi-Fi and greater
processing power compared to the Arduino Uno used in most previous works. This improves cost-effectiveness
and energy efficiency.
Another notable contribution is the inclusion of usability testing using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The
score of 77.11% places the system within the "Good" usability rating, indicating a high level of user satisfaction.
This is particularly relevant for aquaponic farmers who may not be technologically savvy and require intuitive
interfaces.
In summary, the proposed system makes the following contributions:
1. A simplified, low-cost architecture suitable for small farms or educational purposes using ESP32.
2. Real-time monitoring and alerting via Telegram, improving responsiveness and system engagement.
3. Inclusion of a usability study, which is often missing in similar works, providing empirical user feedback.
4. A flexible, web-based visualization interface with historical data access, allowing for better monitoring
and record-keeping.
These contributions address the limitations found in previous systems and support a more user-centric approach
to aquaponic farming management.
FUTURE WORK AND CONCLUSION
To further enhance the functionality and efficiency of the monitoring system, several future improvements are
proposed. First, the integration of an ammonia (NH₄⁺) sensor could provide early warning capabilities in the
event of toxic spikes, improving the robustness of the aquaponic environment. Second, incorporating actuators
to allow remote control of water pumps and pH adjustment mechanisms via mobile devices would increase
automation and user convenience. Finally, temperature control mechanisms such as automated heaters or coolers
could be added to maintain optimal aquatic conditions dynamically. Future iterations may also explore AI-based
prediction models [39], solar-powered frameworks [37], and integration of cloud-based analytics as
demonstrated in recent works [42].
In conclusion, this study has presented an IoT-based aquaponic farming monitoring system designed to address
the key challenges of real-time environmental parameter monitoring. The system utilizes an ESP32
microcontroller and cost-effective sensors to collect and transmit data on water temperature, pH, and water level.
Data visualization is handled through a local web-based dashboard, and real-time alerts are pushed to users via
Telegram, enabling prompt corrective actions.
Compared to prior research, the proposed system demonstrates several key improvements. Unlike previous
works that used proprietary platforms without notification mechanisms or usability testing [6, 12, 19], our system
includes a built-in Telegram alert system and was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS), achieving
a score of 77.11% which indicates strong user satisfaction. The use of the ESP32 also enhances scalability and
integration while reducing cost and complexity, particularly in small-scale or educational settings.
These contributions confirm the potential of the proposed system to serve as a practical, user-friendly, and low-
cost solution for aquaponic farm monitoring. Its design is adaptable to various aquaponic setups and supports
broader sustainability goals. By enhancing food production efficiency, promoting water conservation through
closed-loop systems, and encouraging responsible use of natural resources, the project contributes directly to the
achievement of SDG 2, SDG 6, and SDG 12. Future research can further expand its impact by incorporating
predictive analytics and decision-making support to advance the role of AIoT in sustainable agriculture.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2748
www.rsisinternational.org
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by research from Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM). The authors would
like to express their sincere gratitude to colleagues at the Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat & Komunikasi, UTeM,
for their valuable technical input and constructive feedback during the development of this work. The authorship
of this article reflects equal contribution from all authors involved in the study. Special thanks are extended to
individuals who assisted in formatting and proofreading the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. K. A. Obirikorang, W. Sekey, B. A. Gyampoh, G. Ashiagbor, and W. Asante, “Aquaponics for Improved
Food Security in Africa: A Review,” Front. Sustain. Food Syst., vol. 5, no. August, pp. 1–10, Aug. 2021,
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.705549.
2. I. Ezzahoui, R. A. Abdelouahid, K. Taji, and A. Marzak, Hydroponic and Aquaponic Farming:
Comparative Study Based on Internet of things IoT technologies.,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 191, pp.
499504, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.064.
3. T. Shafeena, “Smart Aquaponics System: Challenges and Opportunities,” Eur. J. Adv. Eng. Technol.,
vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 5255, 2016.
4. R. Nalwade and T. Mote, “Hydroponics farming, in 2017 International Conference on Trends in
Electronics and Informatics (ICEI), IEEE, May 2017, pp. 645650. doi: 10.1109/ICOEI.2017.8300782.
5. FAO, “Integrated Aquaculture and Aquaponics,” in Sustainable Food and Agriculture, Elsevier, 2019,
pp. 251257. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812134-4.00028-5.
6. T. Y. Kyaw and A. K. Ng, Smart Aquaponics System for Urban Farming,” Energy Procedia, vol. 143,
pp. 342347, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.694.
7. L. Beecher, “Aquaponics: System Layout and Components,” in Land-Grant Press by Clemson Extension,
2021. [Online]. Available: https://lgpress.clemson.edu/publication/aquaponics-system-layout-and-
components/
8. J. E. Rakocy, “Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture,” in Aquaculture Production Systems,
Wiley, 2012, pp. 344386. doi: 10.1002/9781118250105.ch14.
9. A. R. Yanes, P. Martinez, and R. Ahmad, “Towards automated aquaponics: A review on monitoring,
IoT, and smart systems,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 263, p. 121571, Aug. 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121571.
10. A. Dutta, P. Dahal, P. Tamang, E. Saban Kumar, and R. Prajapati, IoT based Aquaponics Monitoring,”
1st KEC Conf. Proc., vol. I, no. September, pp. 7580, 2018, [Online]. Available:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327953706
11. M. Alselek, J. M. Alcaraz-Calero, J. Segura-Garcia, and Q. Wang, “Water IoT Monitoring System for
Aquaponics Health and Fishery Applications,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 120, 2022, doi:
10.3390/s22197679.
12. Muhammad Naufal Mansor et al., Aquaponic Ecosystem Monitoring with IOT Application,J. Adv.
Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 345357, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.37934/araset.31.3.345357.
13. A. R. Yanes, P. Martinez, and R. Ahmad, “Towards automated aquaponics: A review on monitoring,
IoT, and smart systems,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 263, p. 121571, Aug. 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121571.
14. A. K. Jena, P. Biswas, and H. Saha, “Advanced Farming Systems in Aquaculture: Strategies To Enhance
the Production,” Innov. Farming, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8489, 2017, [Online]. Available:
www.innovativefarming.in
15. M. Ula, Muliani, and H. A. K. Aidilof, “Optimization of Water Quality in Shrimp-Shallot Aquaponic
Systems: A Machine Learning-Integrated IoT Approach,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., vol. 12, no. 1,
pp. 480491, 2024.
16. M. A. S. M. Noordin, S. Saon, A. K. Mahamad, and M. Abbas, “Aquaponic Monitoring System and Fish
Feeding with Favoriot,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 132148, 2023, doi:
10.3991/ijim.v17i12.38485.
17. Haryanto, M. Ulum, A. F. Ibadillah, R. Alfita, K. Aji, and R. Rizkyandi, “Smart aquaponic system based
Internet of Things (IoT),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1211, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-
6596/1211/1/012047.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2749
www.rsisinternational.org
18. N. M. Stone and H. K. Thomforde, “Understanding your fish pond water analysis report, 2004. [Online].
Available: http://www.ianrpubs.unl.edu/liveg.pdf
19. M. S. T. Abdullah and L. Mazalan, “Smart Automation Aquaponics Monitoring System,” JOIV Int. J.
Informatics Vis., vol. 6, no. 12, p. 256, May 2022, doi: 10.30630/joiv.6.1-2.925.
20. N. Ahmad, M. M. Hasan, M. Rohomun, R. Irin, and R. M. Rahman, “IoT and Computer Vision Based
Aquaponics System,” in 2022 IEEE/ACIS 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering,
Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), IEEE, Dec. 2022, pp.
149155. doi: 10.1109/SNPD54884.2022.10051814.
21. R. K. Kodali and A. C. Sabu, “Aqua Monitoring System using AWS,” in 2022 International Conference
on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), IEEE, Jan. 2022, pp. 15. doi:
10.1109/ICCCI54379.2022.9740798.
22. S. B. Dhal et al., “An IoT-Based Data-Driven Real-Time Monitoring System for Control of Heavy Metals
to Ensure Optimal Lettuce Growth in Hydroponic Set-Ups,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 451, Jan. 2023,
doi: 10.3390/s23010451.
23. N. C. Azemi et al., IOT-based intelligent green houses (IGH) using Lo-Ra technology,” Int. J. Innov.
Creat. Chang., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 274283, 2019.
24. S. Wan, K. Zhao, Z. Lu, J. Li, T. Lu, and H. Wang, “A Modularized IoT Monitoring System with Edge-
Computing for Aquaponics,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 23, p. 9260, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22239260.
25. M. Lowe, R. Qin, and X. Mao, “A Review on Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and Smart
Technology in Water Treatment and Monitoring,” Water, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1384, Apr. 2022, doi:
10.3390/w14091384.
26. D. Saraswathi, P. Manibharathy, R. Gokulnath, E. Sureshkumar, and K. Karthikeyan, “Automation of
Hydroponics Green House Farming using IOT, 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Comput. Autom.
Networking, ICSCA 2018, no. 1997, pp. 14, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICSCAN.2018.8541251.
27. T. B. Pramono, N. I. Qothrunnada, F. Asadi, T. W. Cenggoro, and B. Pardamean, “Water quality
monitoring system for aquaponic technology using the internet of things (IoT),” Commun. Math. Biol.
Neurosci., vol. 2023, pp. 118, 2023, doi: 10.28919/cmbn/8221.
28. M. N. H. Zainal Alam et al., “Smart Farming Using a Solar Powered Aquaponics System for a Sustainable
Food Production,Malaysian J. Sci., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 68–77, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.22452/mjs.vol42no1.7.
29. A. Reyes Yanes, R. Abbasi, P. Martinez, and R. Ahmad, “Digital Twinning of Hydroponic Grow Beds
in Intelligent Aquaponic Systems,Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, p. 7393, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22197393.
30. A. Siddique, J. Sun, K. J. Hou, M. I. Vai, S. H. Pun, and M. A. Iqbal, SpikoPoniC: A Low-Cost Spiking
Neuromorphic Computer for Smart Aquaponics,” Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2057, Oct. 2023, doi:
10.3390/agriculture13112057.
31. J. Brooke, “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale,” in Usability Evaluation In Industry, CRC Press,
1996, pp. 207212. doi: 10.1201/9781498710411-35.
32. N. A. Nik Ahmad and M. Hussaini, “A Usability Testing of a Higher Education Mobile Application
Among Postgraduate and Undergraduate Students,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, no. 09, p. 88,
May 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i09.19943.
33. F. M. Ghabban, M. Hajjar, and S. Alharbi, Usability Evaluation and User Acceptance of Mobile
Applications for Saudi Autistic Children,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, no. 07, p. 30, Apr.
2021, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i07.19881.
34. [V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward
a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425478, 2003.
35. United Nations Malaysia, “Malaysia Sustainable Development Goals Voluntary National Review 2021,”
2021. [Online]. Available: https://malaysia.un.org/en/130612-malaysia-sustainable-development-goals-
voluntary-national-review-2021
36. World Bank Group, “The Future of Food: Harnessing Digital Technologies to Improve Rural
Livelihoods,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31565
37. T. Patil, T. S. Hari, and M. Anitha, “Real-Time Smart Aquarium Monitoring System Driven by IoT,” in
Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Sustainable Energy Technol. Comput. Intell. (SETCOM), 2025.
38. A. T. Naputol, J. I. Ituriaga, B. M. Yu Jeco-Espaldon, and M. G. Giner, “Development of an IoT-Based
Aquaponics Monitoring System with Automated Feeder,” in 2024 IEEE Symp. Industrial Electronics
and Applications (ISIEA), 2024.
39. S. Kalaivani, N. S. Kurian, T. D. Subha, and K. C. Sai, IoT Enabled Aquaponics with AI Prospects:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2750
www.rsisinternational.org
Advancing Automated Monitoring and Sustainable Food Production,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Intelligent
Communication Technol. Virtual Mobile Netw. (ICICV), 2025.
40. J. R. B. Caluag, L. V. D. Cruz, C. F. L. Delfin, and D. R. dela Cruz, “Internet of Things-Based Water
Quality Monitoring System for Brackish Water Fishponds,” in Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and
Communications Technologies, 2025.
41. M. E. Ali, K. Sultan Jasim, and A. Hafeez, “A Smart Monitoring and Observation Framework for
Aquaponics Ecosystem,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 19, no. 4, 2024.
42. M. Dutta, D. Gupta, S. Tharewal, and J. M. Alanazi, Internet of Things-Based Smart Precision Farming
in Soilless Agriculture: Opportunities and Challenges for Global Food Security,” IEEE Access, vol. 13,
2025.