INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
procedures for the release and entry of stocks (Skorna et al., 2011). It is vital for security guards to receive
training and orientation on the use of company documents and proper adherence to receiving policies and
procedures for goods delivered to the store (Fischer & Janoski, 1999). During peak seasons, the volume of goods
and merchandise increases due to customer demand, often resulting in prolonged storage of merchandise in the
loading area, sometimes for days, which further complicates security measures and heightens security risks
(Skorna et al., 2011).
Common incidents at the loading area include shrinkage, pilferage, theft of stocks, discrepancies, losses,
damages, and undocumented incoming and outgoing merchandise. These issues render the store's loading area
a high-risk and vulnerable environment where undesirable events can occur at any time due to existing factors.
The objective of this study is to ensure the comprehensive protection of assets and the prevention of losses or
damage to stocks and merchandise in the loading area, as well as other identified areas requiring protection. The
study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the security measures implemented in the loading area to address
these problems and to propose more efficient security and safety measures to promote loss reduction and
prevention (Greggo & Kresevich, 2010).
Theoretical Background
This study is anchored on the Situational Crime Prevention Theory by Clarke and Mathew. The theory suggests
that crime is not spread evenly across all places, people or times and, to be effective, preventive measures must
be directed to where crime is most concentrated. Focusing on “hot spots” or those places with a high rate of
reported crimes or calls for assistance has proved useful in directing police patrols and crime reduction measures.
Similarly, giving priority to repeat victims of time has proved to be an effective use of prevention resources.
There are sixteen techniques in situational crime prevention: target hardening; entry and exit screening; target
removal; rule setting; access control; formal surveillance; identifying property; stimulating conscience;
deflecting offenders; surveillance by employees; reducing temptation; controlling disinhibitors; controlling
facilitators; natural surveillance; denying benefits; and facilitating compliance (Fennely, 2012).
The Routine Activity Theory by Cohen and Felson, revolves around three things: a potential offender, a suitable
target and the absence of capable guardian. All three must come together in areas of work, play or leisure for
criminal activity to be realized. Routine activity theory uses the same rational methodology as situational crime
prevention techniques for a basis. Therefore target hardening due to the lack of capable guardians, plays an
important role (Fennely, 2012).
This study is further supported by Jhon Bernard’s theory of safety culture, which states that facility is an
important commercial risk. Following an accident, the lack of good safety management system, compounded by
a poor safety culture, is a charge often laid on organizations. Accidents can take up to thirty percentage points
off annual profits and, often, failure to manage safety has a much larger social cost that can involve fatalities or
serious injury to a member of the workforce and public. Dr. Taylor argues that to minimize risks, any hazardous
facility requires robustly engineered safety systems, an effective management system and a developed
organizational safety culture (Taylor, 2010).
Ideally, all deliveries for high risk facilities should take place at a dedicated off site receiving dock where all
deliveries can be properly checked. Then, transit delivery by controlled vehicles bearing seals from dedicated
receiving dock can assure the safety of the facility from unverified vehicles. The vehicles should also be queued,
checked and sealed at some distance from the facility. It is important to note everything about the physical and
operating environment of the shipping or receiving at the loading area including risk or theft mitigation strategies
(Norman, 2010).
In terms of functional layout and reduction of risk in a commercial establishment, unsecured areas such as the
lobby, loading dock, mail room, garage and retail areas need to be separated from the secured areas of the
building. Ideally, these unsecured areas are placed exterior to the main building or along the edges of the building.
For instance, a separate lobby pavilion or loading dock area outside of the main footprint of the building provides
enhanced protection against damage and potential building collapse in the event of an explosion at these
locations. Similarly, placing parking areas outside the building can be highly effective in reducing vulnerability
Page 4378