INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Anbari, al Sajawandi, and Ibn al Jazari (Bulut, 2023; Markaz Tafsir Lil Dirasat al-Quraniyyah, 2015). Their
works delineate categories of permissible and impermissible pauses, clarify semantic consequences of pausing,
and map the close relationship between stopping points and syntactic as well as rhetorical structures. This
tradition establishes waqf and ibtida not merely as technical recitation rules but as instruments of safeguarding
meaning, linking tajwid to the broader fields of grammar, rhetoric, and tafsir (Bulut, 2023; Mårtensson, 2022;
Osman, 2012). The consensus across these sources emphasizes that sound pausing and sound resumption are
indispensable to preserving the intended sense of the verse.
The exegetical literature further embeds waqf and ibtida within interpretive practice. Classical tafsir often
comments on verse segmentation and meaning shifts that arise from different stopping choices, showing how
pausing can highlight theological emphasis, legal implication, or narrative coherence. Discussions of ambiguous
constructions, ellipses, and emphatic particles demonstrate that waqf and ibtida mediate between textual form
and doctrinal understanding (Albayrak, 2021). This integration of recitational guidance with exegetical reasoning
legitimizes waqf and ibtida as a hermeneutical lens that curbs misreading, reinforces cohesion, and channels
listener attention toward intended semantic units.
Modern contributions in tajwid pedagogy recognize the enduring authority of classical rules while raising
concerns about uneven curricular integration. Studies in teacher training and syllabus development report that
waqf and ibtida are frequently subsumed under general tajwid without dedicated progression of competencies .
Contemporary manuals and institutional guides often summarize classical categories but provide limited
scaffolding for practice-based assessment, error analysis, and feedback mechanisms. The literature notes that
without explicit learning outcomes and calibrated rubrics, students may acquire correct pronunciation yet remain
uncertain about context sensitive pausing and resumption.
A parallel stream of research addresses the opportunities and constraints posed by digital and transnational
learning environments. Online platforms and mobile applications have improved access to tajwid instruction,
but findings indicate that automated or asynchronous feedback rarely captures the nuanced decisions required
for waqf and ibtida. Experimental tools that overlay annotated mushaf, synchronized audio, and grammatical
tagging show promise for formative assessment, yet empirical evaluations of their effectiveness remain sparse.
Cross regional classrooms introduce additional variability in linguistic background and instructional
conventions, underscoring the need for adaptable materials that explain the semantic and grammatical rationale
behind stopping choices in accessible terms for non-Arabic speaking learners.
Across these strands, the literature converges on several gaps that motivate the present study. There is a shortage
of standardized competency frameworks that translate classical principles into measurable learning trajectories
for diverse cohorts. Rigorous evaluations of teacher preparation and certification in waqf and ibtida are limited,
as are comparative studies that test different instructional designs across face to face and digital settings. Finally,
few works propose integrated guidelines that align textual theory, pedagogical practice, and technological
affordances. Addressing these gaps, this study synthesizes classical insights and contemporary pedagogy to
articulate guiding principles aimed at strengthening the accurate, meaningful, and spiritually attentive practice
of waqf and ibtida in modern contexts.
Research Methodology
This study employed a qualitative research design to investigate the challenges and guiding principles of waqf
and ibtida in Quranic recitation within modern contexts. Data were primarily collected through documentation
analysis of classical works by early scholars to establish the foundational rules, as well as contemporary
academic sources to identify current practices and issues. This approach enabled a comprehensive understanding
of both the traditional framework and the evolving challenges faced in teaching and applying these sciences
(Lee, 2024; Maxwell & Reybold, 2015; Mihas, 2023).
All collected data were analyzed thematically, allowing the study to identify recurring challenges such as
inconsistencies in pedagogy, the absence of standardization, and the need for practical guidelines. The
methodology was thus designed to integrate classical insights with contemporary realities in order to propose
effective principles for strengthening Quranic recitation in modern contexts.
Page 4866