INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5264
www.rsisinternational.org
Institutional Leadership in Sierra Leonean Higher Education:
Governance, Administration, and Threats to Stability
Mohamed Suffian Kamara
1
, Emmanuel Dumbuya
2*
, James Saysay Kanu
3
1
M.Ed., B.Ed., H.T.C(Sec),T.C, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology Sierra Leone
2
M.Ed., B.Ed., Njala University
3
M.Ed., B.Ed., DAE, CAE, H.T.C(Primary), T.C Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and
Technology Sierra Leone
*
Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100417
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 16 November 2025; Published: 13 December 2025
ABSTRACT
Universities in Sierra Leone play a pivotal role in national development, yet their operations are often hampered
by fragile governance environments, administrative inefficiencies, and political interference. This study
investigates the systemic pressures confronting these higher education institutions, focusing on leadership
vulnerabilities, corruption, and union dynamics. Using documentary analysis of policy reports, institutional
records, and media accounts (20102024), and applying principles of good governance and institutional theory,
findings reveal that institutional leadership is precariously situated, with unresolved tensions often escalating into
crises. This situation, though reflecting observable patterns across Sub-Saharan Africa, is exacerbated by Sierra
Leone’s post-conflict context and chronic underinvestment. The study confirms that failures of good governance
(transparency, accountability) create institutional instability. Key recommendations include strengthening
governance frameworks, depoliticizing leadership appointments, implementing digital administrative systems,
and empowering staff and student unions as independent accountability actors. Addressing these systemic issues
is crucial for enhancing institutional resilience and sustaining higher education's contribution to national
transformation.
Keywords: Higher education, governance, leadership, administration, Sierra Leone, institutional reform
INTRODUCTION
Leadership in higher education is critical for institutional stability, academic quality, and public trust (Altbach,
Reisberg, & de Wit, 2019). In Sierra Leone, higher education is vital for post-conflict reconstruction and human
capital development. However, universities face persistent challenges stemming from weak governance systems,
severe administrative inefficiencies, and pervasive political interference (Jones & Osei, 2024; World Bank, 2023).
These pressures undermine institutional credibility and heighten vulnerability to crises, creating a fragile reality
where even minor disputes can ignite institutional instability.
This paper seeks to answer the following research questions:
What governance and administrative challenges confront universities in Sierra Leone?
How do corruption and political interference affect institutional leadership and credibility?
What role do staff and student unions play in shaping institutional stability?
What reforms are needed to enhance governance, leadership, and accountability in Sierra Leonean higher
education?
By addressing these questions, the study contributes empirically grounded insights to the broader discourse on
higher education leadership in fragile and developing contexts.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5265
www.rsisinternational.org
Conceptual Lens
This study employs good governance theory and institutional theory to analyze the challenges facing university
leadership.
Good Governance Theory provides the normative framework for assessing institutional effectiveness. We
define good governance in this context by the presence of accountability, transparency, adherence to the rule of
law, and efficiency. The analysis seeks to interpret governance gaps as measurable failures to meet these
principles, linking the absence of transparency directly to the escalation of conflict and instability described in
the findings.
Institutional Theory helps interpret the environmental pressures on universities. It explains how higher
education institutions (HEIs) in Sierra Leone struggle to adapt to political and social environments that prioritize
patronage over meritocracy. This lens highlights that the observed administrative inefficiencies are not merely
operational failures but often strategic adaptationsor malpracticesthat allow institutions to conform to
external political demands, thereby weakening their internal integrity and autonomy (isomorphism). This
combined theoretical approach allows us to move beyond simply describing challenges to explaining why they
persist and how they compromise institutional legitimacy.
METHODOLOGY
This research employs documentary analysis, focusing on policy documents, institutional records, government
reports (e.g., World Bank), peer-reviewed studies, and credible media accounts (20102024). Data were subjected
to thematic analysis, identifying recurrent patterns in governance gaps, administrative inefficiencies, corruption,
and union dynamics. Contextual narratives from media were used to illustrate lived realities.
Limitation and Future Research: While documentary analysis provides a broad, contextual overview, its
exclusive reliance on secondary sources limits the richness and validity of the findings regarding specific
leadership behaviors. The study strongly recommends that future research employ a qualitative or mixed-
methods approach, utilizing primary data (interviews and surveys) with institutional actors (leaders, staff,
and students) to triangulate these findings and provide a deeper, more robust understanding of lived
experiences and decision-making processes.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
1. Governance Failures and Accountability Deficit
Decision-making in Sierra Leonean universities is frequently opaque and disproportionately influenced by
external political actors. Oversight bodies often lack the necessary independence and enforcement power, directly
contravening the principles of good governance. This institutional weakness allows mismanagement, such as
prolonged tenure of unqualified officials or non-compliance with statutory regulations, to persist unchecked. The
absence of clear, enforceable accountability structures fuels the volatility that characterizes the sector.
2. Institutional Response to Political Environments (Administrative Inefficiencies)
Administrative operations are severely hindered by bureaucratic delays and outdated systems. The reliance on
manual processes for human resource management and financial tracking perpetuates inefficiency, a direct
consequence of institutions failing to modernize and adapt to contemporary administrative standards. From an
institutional theory perspective, the persistent lack of modern e-governance systems suggests that there are
powerful, non-rational pressures (often political or cultural) preventing the adoption of more efficient systems
that would increase transparency. This inertia frustrates stakeholders and serves as a major contributing factor to
institutional unrest.
3. Corruption and the Erosion of Legitimacy
Financial irregularities, favoritism in recruitment, and procurement mismanagement are widespread issues. These
acts of corruption represent profound breaches of ethical leadership and the fundamental principles of good
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5266
www.rsisinternational.org
governance (specifically accountability and transparency). High-profile cases of misused funds spark staff strikes
and student protests, immediately disrupting academic calendars. Comparatively, while corruption is an
acknowledged issue across Sub-Saharan Africa (Teferra, 2021), Sierra Leone's contextmarked by high
dependence on post-conflict donor funding and weak internal controlsrenders the HEI system uniquely
vulnerable, severely compromising institutional integrity and public confidence.
4. The Complex Role of Union Dynamics
Staff and student unions, while formally intended as accountability actors, often struggle to maintain
independence. Political co-optation and limited capacity (Maganga & Nkhoma, 2020) can compromise their role
as legitimate checks on power. When unions are co-opted or politicized, they cease to function as participatory
mechanisms of good governance. Consequently, instead of serving as constructive mediators in disputes, they
sometimes become vehicles for partisan interests, leading to prolonged institutional crises that further destabilize
the university environment.
IMPLICATIONS
The findings confirm that leadership in Sierra Leonean universities operates in a volatile environment akin to “a
keg of gunpowder.” The root cause of this volatility is the systemic failure of good governance, which creates
structural vulnerabilities that political and corrupt forces exploit. As suggested by Salmi (2022), institutional
resilience requires a deliberate shift toward ethical leadership, fortified governance structures, and the
empowerment of genuinely independent accountability actors to successfully navigate external pressures and
build public trust.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Sierra Leone’s higher education institutions are critically constrained by fragile governance, administrative
inefficiencies, and corruption, all compounded by weak accountability structures. Without urgent, targeted
reforms that address the theoretical failures identified by good governance and institutional theory, stability will
remain elusive and educational quality will continue to decline.
Recommendation Summary:
Reform Priority
Action
Good Governance
Principle Addressed
Strengthen
Governance
Establish independent oversight bodies with robust enforcement
power; institutionalize transparent decision-making processes.
Accountability,
Transparency
Depoliticize
Leadership
Ensure merit-based recruitment and promotion for all senior
academic and administrative roles; limit political interference
through clear policy reforms.
Rule of Law,
Efficiency
Digitalize
Administration
Introduce integrated e-governance systems to streamline HR,
finance, and communication functions.
Efficiency,
Transparency
Empower
Unions
Provide comprehensive training in negotiation and mediation;
safeguard union independence from external political manipulation.
Participation,
Accountability
Enhance
Capacity
Train administrators in governance ethics, resource management,
and conflict resolution.
Efficiency,
Accountability
Increase
Investment
Allocate sustainable funding for infrastructure, research, and
capacity-building.
Sustainability
By prioritizing these reforms, Sierra Leonean universities can reduce instability, restore public trust, and
strengthen their essential role as resilient engines of national transformation.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5267
www.rsisinternational.org
REFERENCES
1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & de Wit, H. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an
academic revolution. Brill.
2. Jones, S., & Osei, M. (2024). Academic leadership and institutional credibility in West Africa. Journal of
Higher Education in Africa, 22(1), 4562.
3. Maganga, F., & Nkhoma, B. (2020). Governance challenges in African universities. Higher Education
Policy, 33(4), 567583. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00189-7
4. Salmi, J. (2022). Leadership and governance in developing world universities. Studies in Higher
Education, 47(12), 24712486. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1948523
5. Teferra, D. (2021). Corruption in African higher education: Patterns and consequences. International
Journal of Educational Development, 82, 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102371
6. World Bank. (2023). Tertiary education governance and accountability in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Washington, DC: World Bank.