
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5349
www.rsisinternational.o
rg
















The constituency development fund is a widely adopted decentralized fund by most governments to improve
the living standards of local communities. However, its implementation continues to be plagued by challenges
such as underutilization, bureaucratic delays in project approvals and fund disbursement. Hence, the study aims
at exploring the current constituency development fund process (CDF) from an operational mechanism point
of view. In order to appreciate the challenges inherent in the process, and pave way for process improvement,
the study employs lean methodology by use of value stream and process mapping to analyze process design and
discover critical points of waste in the process workflow, personal interviews were utilised to appreciate lived
experiences of the process operators and Literature review to benchmark with best practices particularly the
international standardization organization (ISO) process symbols. The study design is exploratory sequential
design. Key Findings indicate that the current CDF process is modelled as a basic linear flowchart, which
operationally functions as a Value Stream Map (VSM), it has redundant process steps (too many steps of a
similar kind e.g., approval steps) thereby resulting in a lot of handoffs, which increases the chances of process
delay, most process steps lack cycle time, which compromises process lead time and data entry is mostly done
manually resulting in missing data between handoffs. Recommendation(s): The Government should adopt the
appropriate Process Map (VSM) with basic ISO compliant symbols in order to enhance its capability and make
it adaptable to conventional software in case of automation, Similar process steps especially approval ones
should be merged to reduce on process handoffs and lead time. Conclusion: The goal of value stream mapping
analysis on process capability of the CDF process was to explore qualitative factors as a baseline of later process
capability computation.
Delays, Handoffs, value stream map, process model, automation, process design

The Zambian Government’s desire to develop various sectors of the country, particularly local communities
through Local Government, was escalated by the adoption of the constituency development fund (CDF), which
was approved by Parliament in 1995 (CDF guidelines, 2022) as a decentralized fund. This has led to
unprecedented increase of the same fund in the recent past of up to 40 million Kwacha per constituency (Mbewe,
2025). However, there is overwhelming evidence of recurring underutilization of CDF across the country due
to bureaucratic delays in project approvals (Hichilema, 2024) observes. These sentiments are re-echoed by
(Sichula, 2025, Pollen, 2025, Likando et al, 2023 & Mofya, 2023)) in their various findings. In addition, Sampa
(2022) reveals that the challenges in question are historical due to the set-up of the CDF process by Central

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5350
www.rsisinternational.o
rg
Government which has a two-year lag period. To that point, George (2003) also observed that whenever an
operational process consistently manifests chronic waste or problems, it is because it was set up that way. Hence
the study explored the CDF process in order to discover where this chronic waste(delay) takes place and pave
way for streamlining and continuous process improvement. It is important to state that even though process
capability immediately signals quantitative analysis, there are qualitative factors such as, process design,
workflow, procedures among others that underline it and must be dealt with first, hence the approach taken in
this case.


The study employed an Exploratory Sequential Design whose goal was to first map the process in question in
order to uncover the inherent operational deficiencies and suggest ways of optimisation. For the purposes of
this article, the focus was only on qualitative aspects.

To analyse variations in the process visualization models of the constituency development fund for project
approval and funding and determine their impact on process capability

In order to obtain the depth of perspective, the population comprised people most knowledgeable about the
CDF process and documents that described the workflow.

The study utilised purposive and snowball sampling techniques. The former for targeting people most
knowledgeable about the CDF process and the latter for accessing the next informant.

1. Value Stream Mapping (VSM) was used to collect data on the understanding of actual work flows
(value- and non-value-added process steps), delays, decisions points and process model(design). In
short, VSM highlighted problem areas of the process.
2. Process Mapping was used to collect data on granular process tasks of various process steps.
3. Personal Interviews were conducted with 10 key stakeholders to validate the CDF process map and
collect performance data. 12 Ward Development committee Chairpersons out of 18 from various wards
were interviewed, 3 interviews were conducted with procurement officers and 2 interviews with the
planning officer.
The total number of interviews was 17 and the stakeholders involved are shown in table 1.
Table 1: List of stakeholders who were interviewed in Kapiri Mposhi Constituency
STAKEHOLDER DESIGNATION
NUMBER
Ward development Chairpersons
8
Council CDF Planning Officer
1
Procurement officers
2

Reviewed literature was used to collect data for benchmarking especially with ISO 9000 on the expected use of
standard process symbols and compare current process design with best practices

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5351
www.rsisinternational.o
rg

Process mapping involves constructing a macro-map (VSM), identifying and prioritizing bottlenecks in the
existing process and constructing a micro-map (PM) to identify the root causes of the bottlenecks, and iterative
redesign. Process mapping (PM) therefore, fundamentally facilitates better understanding of complex systems
and processes, which gives way for adaptation of improvement interventions to their local context (Antonacci,
Lennox, Barlow, Evans, and Reed, 2021).
In order to uncover bottlenecks, inefficiencies and delays in the work flow affecting project implementation,
the above analysis was utilized by visualizing the current CDF process. According to Eckhard, Wittges and
Rinderle-Ma (2025), Visualization has a duo purpose namely to visualize the process model or show information
about process bottlenecks. The purpose of visualization therefore, was to make the process understandable, and
mapping makes it actionable for improvement. As such, it is the first task that an organization implements as a
framework of how operations must be conducted (Mandelburger, Mendling and Mendling, 2014). Process
visualization is so critical that it stands as self-evidence of clarity and effectiveness as argued by Malinova,
Monika and Mendling (2013) that a process map is cognitively effective if it is self-explanatory. The implication
being, process model stands as the first determinant of process capability. Hence, the current CDF process for
project approval and funding was visualized as shown in figures 1and 2 respectively.
Figure 1. CDF Process (Source: CDF guidelines, 2022)
Figure 2. CDF Process (Source: Kapiri Town Council Planning Department)
Figures 1 and 2 represents the visualization of the current CDF process in two versions.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5352
www.rsisinternational.o
rg

The findings reveal the following, (a) there is variation in the visualization of the process model of CDF for
project approval and funding as evidenced by figures 1and 2. The reason being that a flow chart can be
visualized in any way provided the process steps are sequential. As such, the process does not have complete
or 3 basic minimum ISO process symbols, (b)There are too many process steps (13) in number, which create a
lot of handoffs (c) some process steps do not have cycle time that is, the time taken for a process step to complete
a task or how long a task or activity takes from one point to the next as shown in figure 2 while figure 1 does
not have any process step with cycle time, (d) there are too many approval stages signaling the need to
streamline such stages by merging them or some of them, (e) the process steps with the most bottlenecks or
delay points are, Procurement with 1 to 3 months and approval by Ministry of Local Government and Rural
Development and Treasury with cycle time of 2 to 4 weeks and (d) most of the process steps are done manually.


The fact that the current CDF process is modelled as a
linear flowchart, which is a type of a process map but operationally functions as a value stream map is the first
sign of an inefficient process because it conveys the wrong message. Tronier (2025), argues that by design, a
sequential linear flowchart simply shows how the workflow in a process starts and ends in sequential order, by
design, a flowchart is meant for information or instructional purposes only. On the contrary, a value stream map
by design and function, deals with delivery of a good or service and quantifies process performance. Therefore,
the appropriate process model for CDF should be a value stream map as evidenced firstly, by the presence of
cycle times in some process steps and secondly, based on the background that there are bureaucratic delays and
long implementation of projects, it is only value stream map that captures such information.

Malinova et al (2013) indicates that the above analysis is done in two phases. First, by assessing cognitive
effectiveness of the process maps with focus on the design of a process map, without going into the process
details. The assessment is restricted to the process map design regarding whether or not its design conforms to
the principles for designing cognitive effective visual notations (Moody, 2009). Second, by applying the
cognitive fit exists between process design and organizational goals. To that effect, the assessment is to ascertain
whether process design infers any meaning, which leads to effective results. Therefore, if a process map does
not align with the said criterion, then it becomes difficulty to interpret thereby yielding unwanted, unanticipated
effects (Malinova et al, 2013) or as is stated in process capability parlance, the process becomes unstable and
unpredictable hence cannot perform consistently according to specification.
Moody (2009) states that with regards to visual notations or iso symbols, a process must have at least three in
its design to be considered effective. Table 2 shows the visual notations in question with their corresponding
meanings based on the challenges under discussion as a restriction.
Table 2: Basic Flowchart Symbols (Source: based on Moody and ISO 9000)
SYMBOL
NAME
Terminator
Rectangle
Diamond
Delay symbol
Connector

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5353
www.rsisinternational.o
rg
In light of the above, figures 1 and 2 only have two symbols, namely the Connector and rectangle, as such,
according to Moody (2009), they do not qualify as efficient processes. Ramuthi (2025) argues that without the
use of such symbols, which foster clarity and universal understanding, process analysis becomes difficult and
its subsequent improvement.

The other logical and immediate observation after process design is the number of process steps in the CDF
process, which are a lot. As such Hackmd Editorial Team (2024) prioritizes process simplification by
emphasizing elimination of redundant tasks or approvals that do not negatively impact the final outcome. They
further contend that simplicity is at the heart of efficiency as most processes become inefficient due to
unnecessary complexity. Process simplicity is therefore, a key strategy for organizations to reduce wasted time,
cut unnecessary costs, and optimize performance output.
On the contrary, the current CDF process is far from being simple or streamlined as Hackmd Editorial Team
(2024) suggests. It has too many process steps 13 in total as shown in figures 1 and 2. This was due to the fact
that some process steps perform similar activities for example, submissions and approval steps. Therefore, the
current CDF process when redesigned, simplified, and aligned with iso symbols and best practices should have
7 process steps without compromising the final outcome as shown in figure 4.
Figure 3. Application of ISO Symbols to a streamlined CDF Value Stream Map

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5354
www.rsisinternational.o
rg

Procurement, Ministerial approval and Treasury were the process steps with the highest source of waste (cycle
time), with procurement taking up to 1-3 months and ministerial 2-4 weeks. The negative impact of these stages
particularly the procurement stage was notable in the frustration of Respondent A who stated that, “It is difficult
to convince people in the Wards that it is not the Councils fault that implementation of projects takes long, in
fact, sometimes the procurement goes up to 10 to 12 months. It is very frustrating because people we are accused
of delaying the projects.And when asked why an accusation such as this rests on them, the answer was that,
The message of decentralisation has not been clearly explained to the public, what people know is that the
power to make all decisions regarding CDF rests with the local authorities, which is not true.This is true
because through process mapping, it was revealed that certain process steps like procurement and fund
disbursement are not in control of the local Councils anywhere in the Country as the central Government still
holds the power.
On the contrary, Respondent B argued that, The problem with the Council is that they lack communication,
they do not give us feedback about the progress of projects that we submit.” This is evidenced by the lack of
feedback loops in the CDF process as shown in figures 1 and 2.

The key findings affect process capability in the following ways
1. The variations in process visualization and lack of minimum ISO symbols makes the CDF process
ambiguous rendering it vulnerable to different independent interpretation and execution as it signals lack
of standardization. As such, it hinders process improvement because there is no single source of Truth.
2. Numerous approval and submission stages or process step drive excessive process steps and handoffs
resulting in a compounding effect on cycle time, lead time and variation.
3. Excess reliance on manual processing of data results in loss of information between handoffs as
evidenced by some process steps missing cycle time, the process is largely slow, it is highly susceptible
to human mistakes, and it is difficult to create an audit trail of waiting time.
4. The identification of the procurement (1-3 months) stage and ministerial approval (2-4 weeks) as high
sources of waste constrains the entire process and significantly reduces its capability because it entails
a wide process spread. This creates frustration in stakeholders as funding approvals take anywhere
between 3 to 10 months.

Based on the key findings, the Ministry of local Government and Rural Development should adopt a streamlined
standard Value stream map with basic ISO symbols as shown in figure 3 instead of a basic linear flowchart
(Figures 1 and 2) for the reasons discussed. The ministry should introduce cycle times in all process steps to
account for quantitative insights. They should consider automation (Control Charts) of the CDF process
focusing on process steps with measurable timelines or quantitative outputs, for example, approval and fund
disbursement stages. They should do that through a triadic criterion based on,
1. Lead Time or Cycle time stamps: they can compute or record days for proposal development not ranges,
technical appraisals, fund disbursement or contract completion
2. Quality or compliance measures whereby the number of proposals returned for correction, number of
sites failing inspections or rejected procurement documents could be recorded and
3. Financial Variation whereby the variance between the budget versus actual costs and disbursement
timings between allocations can be computed. All these can easily be made into an X-bar, R, p or u chart
Methods: they can achieve the above by integrating a digital CDF management system because if time stamps
are captured digitally, then they can automatically calculate start-end time differences or rejection counts for
example. However, if a digital system does not exist, then structured spreadsheets with formulas and time
stamps can be utilised.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5355
www.rsisinternational.o
rg

The goal of value stream mapping analysis on process capability of the CDF process was to explore qualitative
factors as a baseline of late process capability computation. As a result, create an opportunity for a process that
is devoid of redundances, inefficiencies, waste and very low variation to emerge.

The study was approved on 11
th
April, 2025 by humanities and social science ethics committee at the University
of Zambia. Human participants were issued with consent forms, which they signed before answering questions.

Some of the data was available at Zambia e-Government Procurement systemLogin to e-GP) especially on
procurement and types of projects and bidding.

1. Antonacci, G., Lennox, L., Barlow, J., Evans, L. and Reed, J., 2021. Process mapping in healthcare: a
systematic review. BMC health services research, 21(1), p.342.
2. Eckhard, F., Wittges, H., Rinderle-Ma, S. (2025). Exploring the Role of Visualization in Process Mining:
A Systematic Literature Review. In: Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2025. Lecture
Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 554. Springer, Cham. Https
3. George Michael. L (2003). Lean Six Sigma for Service; How to use lean speed & Six Sigma quality to
improve services & transactions. The McGraw-Hill Companies, United States of America.
4. Hackmd Editorial Team (2024). Top 10 Best Practices to Streamline Processes & Improve Workflows.
[Online]. Accessed 22/10/2025.https://hackmd.io/@stories/streamline-processes-bestpractices
5. Hichilema Hakainde (2023). The Zambian Republican President’s address on Youth Day, 12
th
March,
2023, themed: “Transforming Minds for Accelerated Youth Development. As captured on (Zambia
National Broadcasting Cooperation (ZNBC) 19HRS Main News)
6. Joe Mubuyaeta Likando & Austin Mwange & John Moose & Francis Simui, 2023. "Low Uptake of
7. Constituency Development Fund among Small and Medium Enterprise in Kafue, Zambia," International
Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 138152, June
8. Malinova, Monika and Mendling, Jan (2013). "The Effect of Process Map Design Quality on Process
Management Success"ECIS2013 Completed Research. 160. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/160
9. Mandelburger Monika Malinova, Leopold Henrik and Mendling Jan (2014). An Explorative Study for
Process Map Design. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 204DOI:10.1007/978-
10. 3-319-19270-3_3.Conference: CAiSE Forum (Selected Extended Papers) At: Thessaloniki, Greece
11. Mbewe Moses Jr (2024). Increased CDF to Transform Agriculture.
https://web.facebook.com/citytvzambia/videos/1129587895377232/. Accessed 04/07/2025
12. Mofya Mwenya (2024). Disagreement between council, CDF committee, stall 137 projects in
Kalomo.[Online].https://diggers.news/local/2024/01/31/disagreements-between-council-cdfcommittee-
stall-137-projects-in-kalomo/ Accessed 04/07/2025
13. Moody, D. L., 2009. The "Physics" of Notations: Towards a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual
Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Issue 35, pp. 756778.
14. Pollen Gabriel (2025). Treasury Concerned over Idle CDF Funds.
15. [online].https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=increase+in+cdf+to+36.1+million
+kwacha&mid. Accessed 04/07/2025
16. Process Modeling Best Practices [Online]. Accessed 22/10/2025.
https://docs.processmaker.com/docs/process-modeling-best-practices#process-map
17. Ramuthi Danesh (2025). Flowchart Symbols and Meaning: A Complete Guide. [online].
https://venngage.com/blog/flowchart-symbols/. Accessed 21/10/2025
18. Sampa Miles (2022). Constituency corner on morning live ZNBC interview. [online].
https://web.facebook.com/msampa1/videos/806685620549521/ Accessed 14/10/2022
19. Sichula Augustine (2024). Local govt association applauds increase in 2025 CDF national budget.
[Online]. https://www.zambiamonitor.com/ Accessed 14/06/2025

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 5356
www.rsisinternational.o
rg
20. Sichula Augustine (2025). ‘Leaking tap, Transparency International calls for re-evaluation of CDF
programme as audit exposes underperformance (video). https://www.zambiamonitor.com/leakingtap-
transparency-international-calls-for-re-evaluation-of-cdf-programme-as-audit-
exposesunderperformance-video/ Accessed 04/07/2025
21. Tronier Ryan (2025). Process mapping guide: Definition, how-to, & examples. [Online]. Accessed
06/08/2025 at: https://asana.com/resources/process-mapping