Future research could address these limitations by including more than one service or branch, cross-national or
comparative designs, and mixed method approaches that include combination of appreciative, strengths-based
inquiry with more critical or diagnostic perspectives. Longitudinal and intervention studies of the career
trajectories of personnel over time, and studies that combine interviews and focus groups, with quantitative
indicators of well-being, career outcomes, and organizational performance, would test and refine the patterns
found here and give a bigger picture of military careers and transitions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author sincerely thanks the PAF personnel who shared their experiences and made this study possible.
Appreciation is also given to academic mentors and experts whose guidance helped improve the rigor of the study
as well as to the colleagues who helped along throughout the research process.
REFERENCES
1. Allan, B. A., Batz Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A
meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1114-1150.
2. Armed Forces of the Philippines. (2016). AFP Career Development Handbook.
3. Barnes, R. C. (2015). The new enlisted evaluation system: did the air force get it correct this time.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1040656.pdf
4. Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and
Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 409-434.
5. Flores, M. L. (2024). Strengthening the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ professional military education
of the enlisted personnel towards performance index. International Multidisciplinary Research
Journal. https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/452647
6. Godwin, M. (2024). Keeping up with... Appreciative inquiry. College & Research Libraries News, 85(8),
370-374.
7. Griffith, J., & Bryan, W. R. (2016). Human resource development and learning organizations in the
military. Armed Forces & Society, 42(4), 635-654.
8. Gittell, J. H., Godfrey, M., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2020). Interprofessional teamwork and relational
coordination: Improving healthcare through relationships. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(1), 1-4.
9. Keller, K. M., Robson, S., O’Neill, K., Emslie, P., Burgette, L. F., Harrington, L. M., & Curran, D.
(2014). Promoting Airmen with the Potential to Lead: A Study of the Air Force Master Sergeant
Promotion System.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR581/RAND_RR581.pdf
10. Kraimer, M., Park, Y., & Gerlach, K. (2021). Human resource development before, during, and after
military service. Human Resource Development Review, 20(4), 426-452.
11. Lewis, S., Passmore, J., & Cantore, S. (2016). Appreciative inquiry for change management: Using AI to
facilitate organizational development (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.
12. Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Strengths use and thriving at work among nurses: The mediating
role of hope. BMC Nursing, 24, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01345-9.
13. Marín, M. a. F. (2019). Employee performance evaluation within the economic management system of
the Spanish Air Force: development of a methodology and an optimization model. In Advances in
intelligent systems and computing (pp. 448–455). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_42
14. Mendez, J., et al. (2025). Leading schools as complex systems: Exploring a new strengths-based inquiry
system. Frontiers in Education.
15. Miglianico, M., Dubreuil, P., Miquelon, P., Bakker, A. B., & Martin Krumm, C. (2020). Strength use in
organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 737-771.
16. Nolan, S. T., & Overstreet, R. E. (2018). Improving How the Air Force Develops High-Potential
Officers. 32(2), 21. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/scm_pubs/55/
17. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet
the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847