INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
than men (30%) cited “flexible work schedule” as an advantage of online selling (IFC, 2021). Women vendors
commented that online work let them tend children at home while still running a business.
4.2. Persistent Barriers and Constraints: Despite these advantages, several barriers persist. At the individual
level, many women still lack basic digital skills or confidence. As Olado’s founder Uwizeye noted, educating
customers was a steep challenge: “we had to do both marketing and education… convincing people to adopt a
new way of shopping” (UNCDF, 2021). This reflects low digital literacy among rural populations, especially
older women, who may mistrust online systems. Trust and security are major issues: Women may be reluctant
to share personal or financial data online. Tadhim Uwizeye highlighted early difficulties in Rwanda with “trust
in the safety of [customers’] identifications” (UNCDF, 2021). Mobile money is not yet fully inclusive; women
with no IDs or lower-tech phones often face caps on transaction sizes (IFC, 2021; Moodley et al., 2019).
Harassment-induced invisibility as structural drag: Beyond generic concerns about data security, gendered
cyber-harassment now constitutes a measurable brake on women-led e-commerce. The same Cherie
Blair/Intuit study cited earlier confirms that more than half of interviewed women have endured sexist abuse or
stalking online, and two in five intentionally scale back social-media marketing to protect themselves (Reuters,
2025). This phenomenon—what we term harassment-induced invisibility—shows that DFE is not merely
about network access but about protected access. It therefore reinforces our later call for enforceable, AI-
assisted content-moderation standards and anonymous buyer–seller channels under the AfCFTA Digital Trade
Protocol. Without such safeguards, platform economies risk reproducing street-level intimidation in virtual
form, perpetuating the very structural drag identified in RQ 2.
At the household level, care duties remain constraining. E-commerce does save travel time, but it does not
substitute for the need for childcare or household help. Absent affordable childcare, even home-based work can
become fractured. For example, Ki-Pepeo’s model trains women tailors who might otherwise have been street
vendors or home maids (Ruzibuka, 2024); while this empowers them economically, they must still fit sewing
hours around family needs without organized childcare. Without social support, women entrepreneurs may
stretch themselves thin, juggling client calls with feeding children.
At the infrastructure level, limitations are stark in many regions. Internet connectivity is uneven and mobile
data can be expensive. Fresh 2025 GSMA evidence confirms the divide: women in LMICs are still 14 % less
likely than men to use mobile internet, and—within Rwanda—three-quarters of connected women rely solely
on mobile devices for access (GSMA, 2025), a pattern that limits multi-channel marketing and deepens the
“structural drag” analysed below. In rural areas, inconsistent electricity and poor roads also impede
ecommerce: products can be difficult to deliver reliably outside major cities. National policies have only begun
to address these gaps. For example, while the AfCFTA’s Digital Trade Protocol creates a continental digital
framework (ITC, 2025), most national e-commerce policies lack gender or care provisions. Many African
governments still focus on ICT infrastructure and entrepreneurship in generic terms, without mandating
support for women caregivers (e.g. subsidized childcare or flexible credit terms).
Financial access remains a critical barrier. Even when women have products to sell, they often have less
collateral or credit history than men. McKinsey reports that financial-services providers are less willing to lend
to women (perceiving them as higher risk due to prevalence in informal sectors), and interest rate caps can
reduce loan availability in rural areas (Moodley et al., 2019). On the demand side, women entrepreneurs
typically use new fintech and digital services (crowdfunding, online credit) at lower rates than men (IFC,
2021). For instance, Kasha’s expansion into mobile payment shows promise, but Joanna Bichsel still notes that
many women prefer cash, citing privacy – a preference that fintech must work around.
Socio-cultural constraints also loom large. In some communities, women are expected to be homemakers, and
operating a business – even online – can invite social disapproval. As the IFC study notes, some women only
engage in e-commerce if their family permits it (IFC, 2021). Gender-based harassment online can be a
concern, and women carrying mobile numbers may receive unwelcome contacts (Moodley et al., 2019). These
intangible barriers often mean that even when digital technology is present, women may still face the same
traditional limits on their autonomy and time use (Moodley et al., 2019; Muhammed, 2025).
Page 563