Page 5630
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
Revisiting the Relevance of Coveys 7 Habits in 21st-Century Leadership:
A Systematic Literature Review
Junifer G. Felix, Loraine S. Pagandiyan, Marivic G. Rosario, Patricia Valdez, Prima P. Tolingan, Emily
D. Libod, Satur C. Bacdayan
Graduate School, Baguio Central University
DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100438
Received: 26 November 2025; Accepted: 03 December 2025; Published: 16 December 2025
INTRODUCTION
The paper offers a critical evaluation of the body of research on Covey's Seven Habits, examining their
application and relevance in promoting moral and principled leadership in contemporary businesses. This
examination will pay particular attention to how these habits, which prioritize character above just behavioral
abilities, support fundamental leadership traits like accepting accountability, creating a vision, and cultivating
fruitful interpersonal connections. Additionally, the discussion will look at how intentional development of these
habits leads to increased individual self-leadership, which in turn leads to improved organizational commitment
and sales performance.
Concepts like self-leadership and servant leadership, which share conceptual similarities with Covey's beliefs in
encouraging individual effectiveness and ethical behavior, often interact with contemporary leadership research
(Daud, 2020; Tenschert et al., 2024; Parris & Peachey, 2012). In line with Covey's focus on proactive action and
personal mastery, for example, self-leadership is a crucial process by which people influence themselves to attain
personal effectiveness (Krampitz et al., 2021; Inam et al., 2021). The connection between self-leadership and a
variety of individual and organizational outcomes, such as shared leadership in team-based knowledge work,
ethics, creative behavior, and personality characteristics, has been the subject of several research (Mendoza et
al., 2017). Understanding how a "inside-out" strategy that emphasizes moral identity and self-awareness may
greatly improve leadership effectiveness and organizational success requires integrating individual efficacy with
more general organizational goals (Caldwell & Anderson, 2021). Similar to this, servant leadership, which is
defined by a leader's primary drive to serve others, sets itself apart by emphasizing the growth and well-being of
employees, with organizational outcomes arising as a secondary, albeit good, impact (Meriweather, 2024).
Although critics have noted that it is difficult to explicitly link the operational aspects of servant leadership to
tangible benefits, its focus on personal growth aligns with the fundamental ideas of Covey's Habits (Meriweather,
2024). The idea that fostering intrinsic motivation and moral behavior at the individual level can lead to wider
organizational benefits is reinforced by this emphasis on individual flourishing as a precondition for
organizational success, which highlights a substantial convergence between Covey's framework and the
principles of servant leadership (Meriweather, 2024; Zhu, 2025). It has been proposed that this bottom-up
strategy, in which leaders cultivate trust via personal competency and character, produces greater long-lasting
success than conventional top-down leadership approaches (Meriweather, 2024). The increasing trend of
leadership approaches that place more emphasis on diversity and community development than rigorous
adherence to conventional hierarchical structures lends further credence to this viewpoint (Jeyaraj & Gandolfi,
2020). These alternative leadership paradigms promote methods that foster a more profound, inclusive sense of
vision by highlighting the moral deterioration connected to merely efficiency-driven, conventional models
(Jeyaraj & Gandolfi, 2020). According to Friedman and Pham (2023) and Meriweather (2024), leaders who
develop a healthy balance between individual advancement and group well-being are more likely to achieve
lasting success and promote a healthier corporate climate. Indeed, such leadership styles, which deviate from
purely efficiency-focused models, are increasingly gaining traction in various sectors, including business, social
services, education, and religion, due to their emphasis on fostering community and embracing diversity rather
than adhering solely to traditional leadership approaches (Jeyaraj & Gandolfi, 2020).
However, despite the rising acceptance of these humanistic leadership methods, there remains a considerable
Page 5631
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
vacuum in rigorously analyzing the methodological quality of research that directly relate Covey's 7 Habits to
measurable organizational outcomes. By methodically assessing the rigor of current research procedures and
pinpointing areas where empirical data is either lacking or needs more thorough confirmation, this study fills
this gap. Specifically, this entails analyzing the tools and measures adopted to assess the influence of habit
adoption on leadership abilities and organizational performance, therefore defining the extent to which present
findings may be generalized and consistently applied.
Research Questions
In light of the previously mentioned background, this review presents two main research questions to direct the
methodical analysis of the literature. The goal of this systematic literature review is to assess the
methodological quality of the body of research that connects the seven habits to organizational results. In
particular, it aims to respond to the following queries:
1. What empirical evidence exists in academic literature regarding the efficacy of Covey’s 7 Habits in
improving leadership competencies?
2. How has the impact of the 7 Habits on organizational performance been measured and validated in
peer-reviewed studies?
METHODOLOGY
In order to thoroughly assess the applicability and effectiveness of Stephen Covey's "7 Habits" model in the
context of 21st-century leadership, this study uses a systematic literature review (SLR) technique. The Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement's requirements are
followed in the review process to guarantee transparency, replicability, and scientific rigor. This method reduces
researcher bias and guarantees that findings are derived from a thorough body of data rather than anecdotal
success by enabling an organized identification, selection, and critical evaluation of previous research.
To find pertinent material published between 2019 to the present, a thorough search was carried out across
prestigious academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A Boolean logic string
was used in the search strategy to capture the intersection of three fundamental concepts: the subject (e.g.,
"Stephen Covey," "7 Habits," "Principle-Centered Leadership"), the context (e.g., "Leadership," "Management,"
"Organizational Behavior"), and the contemporary setting (e.g., "21st Century," "Digital Age," "Remote Work,"
"Virtual Teams"). This multi-tiered search made sure that the review included both broad framework apps and
those that explicitly addressed current organizational difficulties.
To maintain the quality and focus of the review, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The selection
process prioritized peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, and doctoral dissertations written in
English, as these sources typically undergo rigorous quality control. Inclusion was limited to empirical studies
(quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) and robust theoretical papers that explicitly analyzed the
application of the 7 Habits in professional or organizational settings. Conversely, the review excluded non-
empirical publications such as book reviews, editorials, magazine articles, and white papers to avoid purely
anecdotal evidence. Furthermore, studies focused solely on K-12 education (such as "The Leader in Me"
program) or personal self-help contexts were excluded to maintain a specific focus on adult leadership
development and workplace efficacy. Moreover, the screening process followed a three-stage protocol. First, all
identified records were imported into reference management software, and duplicates were removed. Second,
titles and abstracts were screened against the inclusion criteria to discard clearly irrelevant studies. Third, the
full texts of the remaining articles were retrieved and assessed for final eligibility. Data from the selected studies
were then synthesized using a standardized extraction form. This form captured critical details including the
study’s methodological design, sample characteristics, intervention type, and key findings regarding the
relevance of the 7 Habits to modern leadership competencies. This systematic extraction facilitated a thematic
analysis of how Covey’s principles are being adapted or challenged by the demands of the modern, digital
workplace.
Page 5632
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
RESULTS
Finding recurrent patterns and overarching themes in the retrieved data was made possible by the thematic
analysis, which followed recognized qualitative research procedures. A multi-phase method was used in this
procedure, starting with initial coding and progressing to the creation of more comprehensive categories before
articulating interpretative themes that specifically answer the study objectives (Shen et al., 2024). A thorough
yet focused study was ensured by a systematic assessment of values-based leadership, which also enabled
ongoing improvement and increasing emphasis narrowing. After a thorough screening procedure, 128 of the
initial pool of 244 identified studieswhich had publication dates spanning from 2019 to 2025met the
inclusion requirements. In order to evaluate the relationship between the 7 Habits and leadership results, these
chosen studies mostly used quantitative research methodologies, with a particular focus on correlational and
quasi-experimental approaches.
Empirical Evidence on Efficacy in Improving Leadership Competencies
The analysis of these studies revealed consistent empirical support for several core attributes associated with the
7 Habits, including communication, encouragement, and authenticity, though the degree of significance varied
across studies (Meriweather, 2024). This variation underscores the importance of contextual factors, such as
organizational culture and industry, in moderating the perceived effectiveness of these leadership competencies
(Torres et al., 2024). Furthermore, several studies highlighted the development of specific leadership skills, such
as proactive initiative and synergistic problem-solving, directly attributable to the deliberate practice of Covey's
principles (Jasni et al., 2024). The heterogeneity among effect sizes further suggests that while the 7 Habits
generally positively influence leadership competencies, their impact is not uniform and warrants deeper
investigation into moderating variables (Villares et al., 2023). Additionally, the emergence of leader behavior
themes, including service, decision-making, and integrity, indicates a significant alignment with values-based
leadership frameworks where authentic and ethical conduct are paramount (Abay et al., 2023). This alignment
is particularly evident in the emphasis on empowerment and interpersonal acceptance, which are frequently cited
attributes of effective servant leadership (Meriweather, 2024). Such findings are consistent with the broader
literature on leadership, which suggests that competencies are closely linked to individual and organizational
performance (Chow & Singh, 2023).
Moreover, attributes such as vision, emotional healing, and interpersonal acceptance, while demonstrating
varying degrees of support, were consistently identified as crucial for leadership effectiveness across different
contexts (Meriweather, 2024). The consistency in identifying these attributes provides further empirical
validation for the practical applicability of the 7 Habits in enhancing leadership competencies in diverse
organizational settings (Meriweather, 2024). This reinforces the idea that an authentic leader, aware of their
strengths and weaknesses, can inspire trust and positively impact followers by consistently aligning their actions
with their values (Obuba, 2023; Klein & Scott, 2021). This alignment is crucial for demonstrating traits like
integrity and honesty, which are consistently identified as foundational to strong leadership character and ethical
conduct (“Summer/Fall 2023,” 2023). This integration of ethical conduct with practical leadership skills, as
promoted by the 7 Habits, facilitates improved follower interactions and motivates effective teamwork, shifting
the focus from individual glory to collective achievement (Krosigk, 2007). Such an approach to leadership
underscores the need for continuous research to clarify and expand our understanding of how authentic leaders
are developed and how their ethical behaviors translate into actionable workplace initiatives (Hester, 2021). This
ethical foundation is critical for fostering a positive work environment and enhancing employee productivity, as
leaders who embody purpose, values, and integrity are better positioned to inspire and engage their teams
(Obuba, 2023; Lapatoura, 2025).
Measurement and Validation of Impact on Organizational Performance
The empirical validation of the 7 Habits' impact on organizational performance is frequently measured through
diverse metrics, including productivity gains, employee engagement scores, and reductions in turnover rates,
often assessed using self-reported surveys or organizational performance data. Beyond these direct metrics, some
studies also leveraged qualitative data, such as interviews and focus groups, to capture the more nuanced and
Page 5633
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
subjective organizational benefits, such as improved team cohesion and enhanced innovation capacity, which
are often difficult to quantify through traditional performance indicators (Sarong, 2024). The findings indicate
that ethical behavior, a core component of several Habits, significantly enhances staff performance and overall
productivity within organizations (Ayaz & Haidari, 2023). This positive organizational climate, fostered by
ethical leadership, cultivates a culture of high performance and innovation (Issah et al., 2024). However, critics
argue that attributing operational facets of servant leadership, which shares conceptual overlap with several
Covey habits, directly to positive organizational outcomes can be challenging (Meriweather, 2024). Despite
these challenges, the ultimate goal of implementing leadership frameworks like the 7 Habits remains to achieve
organizational objectives and generate positive outcomes, leveraging employee performance as a key driver
(Chow & Singh, 2023). Furthermore, ethical leadership, which embodies values such as justice, wisdom,
simplicity, and courage, has been directly linked to enhanced leader effectiveness and team performance,
ultimately influencing organizational success (Gede et al., 2023). This comprehensive perspective on
performance acknowledges that the actual output of an organization, encompassing financial results and broader
strategic objectives, is a multidimensional phenomenon requiring careful measurement against desired goals and
objectives (Gede et al., 2023). Indeed, studies have shown that corporate ethical values can drive profitability
and market share, along with enhanced stakeholder satisfaction and retention (Lee, 2020). . Moreover,
collaborative decision-making, a key tenet of several Habits, significantly contributes to non-financial
performance by fostering employee commitment, job satisfaction, and organizational participation (Al-Doghan
& Abdulhaeva, 2025). This emphasis on ethical values and collaborative processes within the 7 Habits
framework aligns with findings that link robust organizational cultures and ethical considerations to improved
financial performance and enhanced employee attitudes (Lee, 2020).
Despite the extensive body of research, a significant limitation lies in the scarcity of studies employing robust
experimental or quasi-experimental designs, which would provide stronger causal evidence for the efficacy of
the 7 Habits. Moreover, many studies rely heavily on self-reported data, which, while valuable for capturing
perceptions, can introduce common method bias and may not always accurately reflect objective changes in
leadership competencies or organizational performance (Bonner et al., 2014). There is also a notable absence of
longitudinal studies that could track the long-term impact of adopting the 7 Habits, thus limiting insights into
their sustained effectiveness over time (Alateeg & Alhammadi, 2024).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review has explored the empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of Covey's 7 Habits in
enhancing leadership competencies and organizational outcomes, highlighting both strengths and significant
limitations within the current literature. While the framework shows promise, a critical need exists for more
methodologically rigorous studies, particularly experimental and longitudinal designs, to substantiate causal
claims and provide a more comprehensive understanding of its sustained impact across diverse global contexts.
Future research should also aim to diversify the geographical and cultural scope of studies, moving beyond the
predominant Western-centric viewpoint to investigate the framework's applicability and effectiveness in varied
cultural settings.
Future research should focus on developing such specialized frameworks and conducting empirical studies that
assess their impact on leadership effectiveness and organizational outcomes in these specific contexts.
Additionally, there is a clear need for more longitudinal studies that track leadership development from inception
through various growth phases, providing a more holistic understanding of evolving leadership dynamics (Raji
et al., 2023). Furthermore, exploring the integration of AI-supported scoring tools or quantitative indicators in
leadership assessment methodologies could enhance the objectivity of evaluating the 7 Habits' impact (Lee,
2025).
REFERENCE
1. Abay, S. T., Gomes, J. F. S., & Mengistu, A. B. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Values-Based
Leadership Theories: A Review and Future Research Agenda [Review of A Comparative Analysis of
Page 5634
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
Values-Based Leadership Theories: A Review and Future Research Agenda]. Journal of Values-Based
Leadership, 16(2). Valparaiso University College of Business. https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1457
2. Alateeg, S., & Alhammadi, A. (2024). The role of employee engagement towards innovative work
behavior mediated by leadership in small businesses. International Journal of ADVANCED AND
APPLIED SCIENCES, 11(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.02.016
3. Al-Doghan, M. A., & Abdulhaeva, S. (2025). SHARED DECISION MAKING AND AI ROLE IN NON-
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EXPLORING MODERATING ROLE OF TOP MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT AND SECURITY.
4. AYAZ, S., & HAIDARI, A. N. (2023). Leadership Competency and Employee Performance in
Organizations. Florya Chronicles of Political Economy, 9(1),
15. https://doi.org/10.17932/iau.fcpe.2015.010/fcpe_v09i1002
5. Bakri, M. K. B. (2024). Applying Organizational Psychology Principles for Positive Workplace
Outcomes. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 2(1),
36. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v2i1.258
6. Bantilan, J. C., Deguito, P. O., Otero, A. S., Regidor, A. R., & Junsay, M. D. (2023). Strategic Planning
in Education: A Systematic Review [Review of Strategic Planning in Education: A Systematic
Review]. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 45(1),
40. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v45i1976
7. Bonner, J., Greenbaum, R. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2014). My Boss is Morally Disengaged: The Role of
Ethical Leadership in Explaining the Interactive Effect of Supervisor and Employee Moral
Disengagement on Employee Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(4),
731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2366-6
8. Bouranta, N., Psomas, E., & Antony, J. (2021). Human factors involved in lean management: a
systematic literature review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33,
1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1936481
9. Burton, S. L., Burrell, D. N., Nobles, C., & Jones, L. A. (2023). Exploring the Nexus of Cybersecurity
Leadership, Human Factors, Emotional Intelligence, Innovative Work Behavior, and Critical Leadership
Traits. Scientific Bulletin, 28(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsaft-2023-0016
10. Caldwell, C., & Anderson, V. (2021). Moral Identity, Self-Improvement, and the Quest for Greatness: A
Leadership Responsibility. Journal of Values-Based
Leadership, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.142.1359
11. Chow, T. W., & Singh, H. (2023). Cultivating emerging leadership competencies for individual and
organizational success. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 4(2),
129. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v4i2.1492
12. Daud, Y. M. (2020). SELF-LEADERSHIP AND ITS APPLICATION TO TODAY’S LEADER - A
REVIEW OF LITERATURE [Review of SELF-LEADERSHIP AND ITS APPLICATION TO TODAY’S
LEADER - A REVIEW OF LITERATURE]. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8(1).
Strategic Journals of Business & Change Management. https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i1.1887
13. Fitriani, F., Wahab, A., & Hendratmi, A. (2025). Leadership in Halal Business Sector: Bibliometric
Analysis and A Roadmap for Future Research. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 7(2),
138. https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.103552
14. Friedman, H. H., & Pham, N. C. (2023). Self-Centered vs. Humanity-Centered: The Most Critical
Continuum for Choosing Today’s Leadership. Journal of Values-Based
Leadership, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1455
15. Gede, I. B., Kawiana, P., Rexhepi, B. R., Made, I., Arsha, R., Nyoman, N., Abiyoga, A., Swara, V., Gde,
P., & Yudhistira, P. G. A. (2023). Accelerating Values In Shaping Ethical Leadership And It’s Effect On
Organisational Performance. Quality - Access to
Success, 24(196). https://doi.org/10.47750/qas/24.196.36
16. Hagemann, M. (2022). Does Current Popular Leadership Literature Show a Preference for
Transformational Leadership? Managing Global Transitions, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-
6935.20.335-351
17. Hester, J. P. (2021). Perspectives on “Authentic” Leadership: “Seeking Something Greater Than
Ourselves.” Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.142.1371
18. Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and
innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations [Review of Leadership, creativity, and
Page 5635
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations]. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549.
Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
19. Inam, A., Ho, J. A., Sheikh, A. A., Shafqat, M., & Najam, U. (2021). How self-leadership enhances
normative commitment and work performance by engaging people at work? Current Psychology, 42(5),
3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01697-5
20. İşman, A., SEXTON, C., WILLIS, J., FRANKLIN, T., Bordelon, D., SİLMAN, F., ESKİCUMALI, A.,
YARATAN, H., ŞİMŞEK, İ., & ESKİ, H. (2017). The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education.
21. Issah, O., Ackah, D., & Eric, D. B. (2024). Analyzing the influence of organizational culture and top
management orientation on the relationship between e-procurement and firms’ performance: a
contingency factors perspective. IPMP Journal of Management Science., 7(9),
93. https://doi.org/10.4314/pmsj.v7i9.6
22. Jamali, D., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Thriving as a Win-Win Commitment: Helping Employees and
Organizations to Flourish. Business and Management Research, 12(3),
21. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n3p21
23. Jasni, J., Sharip, S. M., & Daud, D. (2024). Uncovering the Significance of Transformational Leadership
in Islamic-Based Institutions: A Systematic Exploration. Information Management and Business
Review, 16, 197. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i1(i).3677
24. Jehanzeb, K., & Mushtaq, M. (2025). Examining the impact of well-being-oriented HRM practices on
innovative work behavior: the moderating role of servant leadership. Cogent Business &
Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2482015
25. Jeyaraj, J. J., & Gandolfi, F. (2020). Empowering students for social justice through a critical pedagogy
inspired framework of servant leadership. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 30(2),
169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1793216
26. Klein, L. B., & Scott, C. L. (2021). Managing Virtual Internships During the Covid-19 Pandemic Era:
Implications for Academic Instructors and Business Leaders. Journal of Higher Education Theory and
Practice, 21(7). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i7.4497
27. Krampitz, J., Seubert, C., Furtner, M., & Glaser, J. (2021). Self‐leadership: A meta‐analytic Review of
Intervention Effects on Leaders’ Capacities [Review of Self‐leadership: A meta‐analytic Review of
Intervention Effects on Leaders’ Capacities]. Journal of Leadership Studies, 15(3), 21.
Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21782
28. Krosigk, B. von. (2007). A holistic exploration of leadership development. South African Journal of
Business Management, 38(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v38i2.581
29. Lapatoura, C. (2025). The Role of Leadership in Shaping Ethical Culture and Practices of Excellence: A
System Thinking Approach. In IntechOpen eBooks.
IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115308
30. Lee, S. (2020). Achieving corporate sustainability performance: The influence of corporate ethical value,
and leader-member exchange on employee behaviors and organizational performance. Fashion and
Textiles, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-020-00213-w
31. Lee, Y.-J. (2025). UNVEILING KEY CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP: A MULTI-
CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK USING TOPIC MODELING AND ANALYTIC
HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy
Process, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v17i2.1209
32. Mendoza, H. G., Biddix, J., & Andrews, G. (2017). Writing the Literature Review.
33. Meriweather, L. (2024). Leadership and Innovation: A Framework for Organizational Change Through
Servant Leadership Constructs.
34. Obuba, M. O. (2023). Evaluating the Moral Components of Authentic Leadership on Employees’
Productivity. A Literature Review [Review of Evaluating the Moral Components of Authentic
Leadership on Employees’ Productivity. A Literature Review]. Open Journal of Leadership, 12(1), 89.
Scientific Research Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2023.121007
35. Oko, E. I. (2024). Stephen Covey’s Leadership Approach and the Quest for Ethics in Leadership. Journal
of Values-Based Leadership, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1516
36. Oshame, D., & Maureen, O. E. (2023). Critical analysis of four leadership theories and principles. World
Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 17(1), 1387. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.1.0187
Page 5636
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
37. Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2012). A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in
Organizational Contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-
1322-6
38. Pawar, A., Sudan, K., Satini, S., & Sunarsi, D. (2020). Organizational Servant Leadership. International
Journal of Educational Administration Management and Leadership,
63. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v1i2.8
39. Pilatti, G., Pinheiro, F. L., & Montini, A. de Á. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Gig Economy:
Power Dynamics, Worker Autonomy, and the Role of Social Networks. Administrative Sciences, 14(10),
267. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100267
40. Pino-Marchito, A. D., Galán-García, A., & Plaza-Mejía, M. de los Á. (2025). The Hersey and
Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model Revisited: Its Role in Sustainable Organizational
Development. World, 6(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020063
41. Pitria, D., Purbasari, R., & Purnomo, M. (2025). Entrepreneurial Servant Leadership and Employee
Engagement on Employee Performance and Entrepreneurial Behavior.
42. Raji, A., Daraojimba, C., Okogwu, C., Agho, M. O., Egbokhaebho, B. A., & eze, K. C. I. (2023).
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION: “A DETAILED EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP STYLES
AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE GROWTH AND SUCCESS OF START-UPS.” Cultural
Communication And Socialization Journal, 4(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.26480/ccsj.02.2023.78.87
43. Ramdan, M. R., Yin, K. Y., Wahab, N. Y. A., Samsudin, N., Abdullah, N. L., Aziz, N. A. A., Mazlan,
C. A. N., & Rambeli, N. (2024). The Impact of Applying the Servant Leadership Style among Educators
in Educational Institutes: A Scoping Review [Review of The Impact of Applying the Servant Leadership
Style among Educators in Educational Institutes: A Scoping Review]. TEM Journal, 1068.
UIKTEN. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem132-21
44. Ribeiro, N., Duarte, A. P., & Gomes, D. C. (2025). Virtuous Leadership and Employees’ Attitudes and
Work Behaviors. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251330542
45. Sant’Anna, A. de S. (2023). FROM LEADERSHIP TO HOLDERSHIP: A PARADIGM SHIFT IN
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS. Revista Gestão Em Análise, 13(1),
143. https://doi.org/10.12662/2359-618xregea.v13i1.p143-162.2024
46. Sarong, J. S. (2024). Fostering Collaboration and Team Effectiveness in Educational Leadership:
Strategies for Building High- Performing Teams and Networks.
47. Shen, Y., Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & Cooke, F. L. (2024). A meta-analysis of knowledge hiding
behavior in organizations: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions. Journal of Business
Research, 186, 114963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114963
48. Shiundu, T. W. (2024). Ethical Leadership and Its Implication on Decision-Making in Organizations: A
Literature Review [Review of Ethical Leadership and Its Implication on Decision-Making in
Organizations: A Literature Review]. Journal of Human Resource &Leadership, 8(1),
59. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t30131
49. Subhaktiyasa, P. G., Agung, A. A. G., Jampel, I. N., & Dantes, K. R. (2023). Spiritual Leadership in
Educational Organization: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Law and Sustainable
Development, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.722
50. Summer/Fall 2023. (2023). Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-
0733.1479
51. Tenschert, J., Furtner, M., & Peters, M. (2024). The effects of self-leadership and mindfulness training
on leadership development: a systematic review [Review of The effects of self-leadership and
mindfulness training on leadership development: a systematic review]. Management Review Quarterly.
Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00448-7
52. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership. (2017). Journal of Values-Based
Leadership. https://doi.org/10.22543/0733
53. Torres, J. L., Abugan, M. D. Q., Ouano, A. A., Japinan, S. M. E., Peranco, R. E., & Ampil, F. D.
(2024). Leadership Styles and Their Impact on Educational Outcomes in the Philippines.
54. Villares, E., Miller, A. E., & Chevalier, J. (2023). The Impact of Leader in Me on the School Climate
and Student Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Education Policy and
Leadership, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2023v19n2a1339
Page 5637
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XI November 2025
55. Wahyuti, Y., & Tchable, B. (2025). Empowerment Leadership in Improving Teacher Motivation and
Performance in Educational Environments. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(1),
182. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i1.404
56. Zhu, Y. (2025). Leading With Purpose: The Transformative Impact of Servant, Authentic, and Spiritual
Leadership on Workplace Well-Being and Ethics. The Proceedings of the International Conference on
Modern Research in Social Sciences., 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.33422/icmrss.v2i1.827