The phenomenon of connected but alone is also closely related to the concept of "digital loneliness". In recent
research, Lim et al. (2023) explain that digital loneliness does not always mean lacking social connections, but
arises when online relationships do not provide deep emotional meaning. For Gen Z, whose interactions are
mostly conducted through digital media, these pseudo-relationships actually create an inexplicable sense of
emptiness.
Interestingly, behind all these negative impacts, respondents showed a high awareness of this problem and have
a desire to change. This indicates that although trapped in the cycle of constant connectivity and experiencing
connected but alone, individuals essentially still long for authentic interaction and are aware of the importance
of balance.
REFERENCES
1. Barassi, V. (2016). Constant connectivity and the self: A study of social media and work-life balance.
Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 823–837.
2. Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). The effect of social
media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 10763.
3. Candiotto, L. (2022). Loneliness in the age of digital hyperconnectivity. Ethics and Information
Technology, 24(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09669-4
4. Vorderer et al. (2018)
5. Hunt, M. G., Marx, R., Lipson, C., & Young, J. (2018). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases
loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768.
6. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311.
7. Liu, D., Baumeister, R. F., & Yang, C. C. (2022). Constant connectivity and its psychological effects: A
meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107370.
8. Lim, M., Chen, D., & Lee, J. (2023). Digital loneliness among young adults: Paradox of connection.
Journal of Youth Studies, 26(4), 521–538.
9. Lee, S. Y., Lee, K., & Choi, J. (2020). Social media use and well-being in emerging adults: Understanding
the role of social comparison and social connectedness. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 65–73.
10. Marwick, A. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale
University Press.
11. Nasrullah, R. (2020). Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Simbiosa
Rekatama Media.
12. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
13. Dimock, 2019
14. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and
behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.
15. Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2021). Online social media fatigue and psychological
wellbeing: A systematic review. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 39(3), 238–259.
16. Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center.
17. Roberts, J., & David, M. (2017). Put down your phone and talk to me: The relationship between phubbing
and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 8–17.
18. Sari, D. A., & Prasetyo, B. (2022). Fear of missing out (FOMO) pada generasi muda Indonesia: Analisis
budaya kolektivisme. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 20(2), 113–125.
19. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other.
Basic Books.
20. Turkle, S. (2017). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Books.
21. Twenge, J. M. (2019). iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More
Tolerant, Less Happy---and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Atria Books.
22. Vaterlaus, J. M., Spruance, L. A., Frantz, K., & Kruger, J. S. (2021). College student social media use
and mental health: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100067.