INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Around the world, Air Force’s career progression is characterized by a structured ranking system intricately
linked to specific duties and leadership, ensuring personnel are aware of their career trajectory (Nolan &
Overstreet, 2018). The leadership role of the supervisors play a crucial role in mentoring, guiding, and supporting
subordinates through regular interactions which significantly impacts leadership development and operational
effectiveness (Rennekamp, 1986). Promoting lifelong learning and adaptability through training pathways
strengthen career development (Paiva, 2024). Equipping aircrew through continuous training programs not only
equip them for operations but more importantly providing them with necessary technical proficiency and
strategic thinking (Flores, 2024; Robbert et al., 2003).
Further, robust performance evaluation system defines the operations within the Air Force. It establishes
standards crucial for assessing personnel performance, guiding decision-making, and optimizing resource
allocations (Barnes, 2015; Keller et al., 2014). To cite performance evaluation methodologies, the Philippine Air
Force uses a comprehensive performance evaluation system integrating the Performance Governance System
(PGS), a Philippine-developed framework for public institutions, and Balanced Scorecard, (Philippine Air Force,
2018), Spanish Air Force uses an interdisciplinary performance evaluation model (Fernández-Villacañas Marín,
2019), and The U.S. Air Force employ feedback and documentation of performance using Officer Evaluation
System (Wolfgeher, 2009). These systems are designed to improve and enhance effectiveness and efficiency of
Air Force’s human resource (Wolfgeher, 2009; Barnes, 2015; Keller et al., 2014).
As the air component of Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the PAF relies on the sustained professional
growth and participation of its officers and enlisted personnel to the changing demands of security and goals of
modernization (Philippine Air Force, 2023).
The PAF has a well-organized career structure, in which officers and enlisted men are differentiated by their
respective ranks, periods of service and training routes, and career progression is determined by strict promotion
boards, competency evaluations and performance evaluations (AFP Career Development Handbook, 2016).
Standardized military education, specialty courses, and course work for basic and advance schooling create
staged pipelines of preparation to levels of increasing responsibility; while evaluation systems and time in grade
regulation control the probable promotion. To cite an example, the Armed Forces of the Philippines Education
and Training Management System (AFPTEMS) is a pivotal professional development mechanism among
enlisted personnel emphasizing the importance of education in career advancement (Flores, 2024). Not to
mention, the Philippine Air Force employs a clear hierarchy of ranks, thereby, facilitating a systematic approach
towards career progression, advanced studies, promotions, and responsibilities.
At the same time, PAF members experience some challenges, including competition for limited promotion slots,
frequent job reassignments, and the pressure to balance the demands of operations and requirements of schooling
and performance ratings, which may have an effect on perceived fairness, motivation, and long-term career
planning. Career development is therefore important not only from a personal perspective, but also in terms of
job satisfaction and mission preparation as research has shown that supportive and developmental career climates
is associated with greater levels of engagement, commitment, and adaptability in high stakes organizations
(Kraimer et al., 2021).
However, little empirical work has been done examining career development in the PAF from a strengths-based
perspective. Existing initiatives tend to rather focus on evaluation and promotion processes, with less emphasis
and attention on how individual and collective strengths, values, and aspirations can be utilized for sustainable
careers and effective transition from service (AFP Career Development Handbook, 2016). This gap is
consequential for human resource development, modernization planning, and post service reintegration, as
international research has established a link between strengths-oriented career practices, higher engagement,
resilience, and proactive development behavior (Kraimer et al., 2021; Flores, 2024; Wolfgeher, 2009; Barnes,
2015; Keller et al., 2014).
With the preceding discussions outlining a clear gap in understanding career development among the Air Force,
this paper adopts Appreciative Inquiry (AI) as its methodological approach. AI provides an appropriate approach,
as it seeks to understand the strengths, successes, and potential as leverage for change, which is appropriate for
Page 6250