INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
CONCLUSION
The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education significantly alters learning experiences by
converting conventional classrooms into dynamic and individualized learning environments. AI technologies
provide personalized assistance, instantaneous feedback, and customized learning pathways, resulting in
improved student engagement, motivation, and academic achievement. The relationship between AI, the
learning environment, and learning outcomes is deeply interconnected. AI enriches the learning environment
through personalization and analytics, while supportive learning environments enhance the effectiveness of AI.
Together, they create a synergy that leads to improved engagement, motivation, and academic performance.
Understanding this three-way relationship is crucial for educators, researchers, and policymakers aiming to
harness AI’s full potential in transforming education.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In a rapidly evolving educational landscape driven by technological advancements, it is imperative for educators
to alter their perspectives on teaching and learning. The introduction of AI, AR, and VR in the education industry
has fundamentally transformed learning environments and, consequently, learning outcomes. It is thus advisable
for educators to adopt the novel modifications to enhance the educational experience for the digital natives that
comprise the present generation of learners.
REFERENCES
1. A Alomair, M. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Applications on Enhancing the Quality of
Secondary-Level Education: Perspectives of Teachers and Students aking Skills. Journal of Faculty of
Education-Assiut University, 40(5), 1-45.
2. AI Impact on Education: Its Effect on Teaching and Student Success. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 June 2025,
3. Alam, A. (2023). Harnessing the Power of AI to Create Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Enhanced
Classroom Experience and Improved Learning Outcomes. In G. Rajakumar, K.-L. Du, & Á. Rocha
(Eds.), Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (Vol. 171, pp. 571–591).
4. Ait Baha, T., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., & Fadili, H. (2024). The impact of educational chatbot on
student learning experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 10153-10176.
5. Baillifard, A., Gabella, M., Lavenex, P. B., & Martarelli, C. S. (2023). Implementing learning principles
with a personal AI tutor: A case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13060.
6. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
7. Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.
8. Brooks, S., Dobbins, K., Scott, J. J. A., Rawlinson, M., & Norman, R. I. (2014). Learning about learning
outcomes:
the
student
perspective. Teaching
in
Higher
Education, 19(6),
721–733.
9. Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review
of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28.
10. Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning
environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college
students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581-599.
11. Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2022). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning
experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics. Learning environments research, 25(1),
271-285.
12. Cheung, S. K., Kwok, L. F., Phusavat, K., & Yang, H. H. (2021). Shaping the future learning
environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational
Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 16.
13. Elimadi, I., Chafiq, N., & Ghazouani, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Digital Learning
Environments (DLEs): Towards Adaptive Learning. In A. Chakir, J. F. Andry, A. Ullah, R. Bansal, &
Page 6476