INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
The Impact of Student Integration, Academic Motivation, and Self-  
Esteem on Academic Performance: A Conceptual Model for  
Malaysian Universities  
Nur Kamarul Hafiz bin Jamil., Amir Faisal bin Ahamed Latfi  
Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Malaysia  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 28 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
This conceptual paper examines how peer mentoring influences academic growth among university students in  
Malaysia, grounded in Social Learning Theory. These programs, where senior students mentor juniors, are  
increasingly recognized for improving retention, engagement, and performance. However, their implementation  
in Malaysian universities remains inconsistent and lacks a unified theoretical foundation. The study proposes a  
framework that views academic development as the primary outcome affected by three key factors: student  
integration, academic motivation, and self-esteem. These factors function as mechanisms through which  
mentoring enhances self-efficacy, persistence, and resilience. The paper reviews both international and local  
literature to demonstrate how observational learning, modelling, and reinforcement within mentoring  
relationships foster academic success. A survey-based, quantitative research design utilizing PLS-SEM analysis  
is outlined to test the framework. This research advances theory by applying Social Learning Theory to structured  
peer mentoring and provides practical insights for creating effective mentoring programs. The goal is to help  
institutions improve student engagement, academic achievement, and well-being, ultimately reducing dropout  
rates and enhancing overall educational outcomes.  
Keywords: Peer mentoring, Student integration, Academic motivation, Self-esteem, Academic development  
INTRODUCTION  
Entering university brings significant challenges for students, such as academic demands, social isolation, and  
emotional pressures. First-year students are especially at risk, often finding it hard to adjust to new learning  
environments, which can result in lower performance and higher dropout rates [15, 47]. Peer mentoring  
programs, where senior students support juniors, have shown positive outcomes worldwide, enhancing retention,  
GPA, and student engagement [17, 8, 18, 20]. In Malaysia, these programs are becoming more common, but  
their deployment remains inconsistent and lacks standardized empirical evidence [24, 33, 45].  
Malaysian universities struggle to establish structured peer-mentoring programs despite recognizing their  
benefits, mainly because of limited research on their effectiveness and the absence of a solid theoretical basis  
[34, 15, 45]. Without a clear conceptual framework, these programs risk not producing measurable academic  
improvements. This conceptual paper aims to develop a framework that explains how peer mentoring affects  
student academic growth in Malaysian universities. It focuses on the roles of student integration, academic  
motivation, and self-esteem as key factors. By reviewing both international and local literature and grounding  
the discussion in established theory, particularly Social Learning Theory, which emphasizes learning through  
observation, modelling, and reinforcement in social contexts [12, 45], the paper proposes that peer mentoring  
can enhance academic achievement by promoting self-efficacy, motivation, and social integration.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
Underpinning Theory Foundation for Developing Research Constructs  
Social Learning Theory posits that people learn by watching others and imitating behaviours that lead to success  
[23, 25, 16]. Peer mentoring exemplifies this idea by offering mentees role models—senior students who  
Page 693  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
showcase effective study strategies and coping skills. Through observing and engaging with these models,  
mentees adopt and internalize these behaviours, boosting their academic growth [36, 8]. A central aspect of this  
theory is self-efficacy, which affects motivation, perseverance, and resilience; key factors in this research [12,  
49]. Peer mentoring enhances self-efficacy via vicarious experiences (seeing mentors succeed), verbal  
encouragement (feedback and support), and emotional reassurance (reducing anxiety) [10, 22, 35]. These  
pathways illustrate how mentoring influences academic motivation and self-esteem. Additionally, Social  
Learning Theory highlights the importance of social reinforcement and environmental context, aligning with  
student integration.  
Academic Development  
Academic development involves improving students’ academic performance and learning skills through  
structured peer-mentoring programs [22, 6]. It goes beyond just grades to include better study habits, time  
management, and active participation in academic activities [5, 13, 4]. Peer mentoring offers mentees guidance  
and support, helping them adjust to university life, tackle educational challenges, and build confidence in their  
learning abilities [2, 30, 44].  
Academic development also involves gaining key skills like critical thinking, problem-solving, and effective  
communication, which are vital for success in higher education and future careers [9, 13, 4]. These skills are  
developed through mentor-mentee interactions that provide experiential learning and personalized feedback [2,  
36, 21]. Evidence shows that students involved in peer mentoring tend to have higher GPAs, display greater  
persistence, and feel more satisfied with their academic journey than those who do not participate [6, 42].  
In this conceptual framework, academic development is positioned as the primary outcome variable, influenced  
by peer mentoring through three driving factors, particularly student integration, academic motivation, and self-  
esteem. These constructs collectively shape students’ academic performance and their ability to thrive in the  
university environment.  
Student Integration, Academic Motivation, and Self-Esteem  
The study proposes independent variables such as student integration, academic motivation, and self-esteem,  
which are key factors through which peer mentoring impacts academic development. These concepts are  
grounded in Social Learning Theory, which highlights that learning occurs through observation, modelling, and  
reinforcement in social settings.  
Student integration measures how connected students feel to their academic and social environment. As noted  
in [11, 49], integration is vital for persistence and success in higher education. Peer mentoring programs enhance  
integration by providing structured interaction opportunities, encouraging participation in campus activities, and  
fostering supportive peer networks. This sense of belonging reduces feelings of isolation and promotes active  
engagement in academic tasks, which ultimately enhances academic performance [20, 28].  
Academic motivation involves both internal and external factors that influence students’ commitment to learning.  
Drawing from Self-Determination Theory and supported by Social Learning Theory, motivation can be intrinsic,  
such as the desire for knowledge, or extrinsic, driven by rewards and recognition [49, 26]. Peer mentoring  
enhances motivation by providing goal-setting strategies, constructive feedback, and positive reinforcement.  
Observing successful mentors also offers vicarious experiences that increase mentees’ confidence in their ability  
to succeed, leading to greater persistence and academic engagement [7, 27].  
Self-esteem pertains to how students view their academic abilities and general self-worth. When students have  
high self-esteem, they are more likely to engage actively in learning, show resilience, and feel confident in  
overcoming academic difficulties. Conversely, low self-esteem is often linked to avoidance behaviours and  
poorer performance [32, 48]. Peer mentoring programs enhance self-esteem by providing validation,  
encouragement, and emotional support. Mentors serve as role models, showcasing effective coping strategies  
and boosting mentees’ confidence in their academic skills [24, 46].  
Page 694  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Relationships Between Independent and Dependent Variables  
The relationship between student integration, academic motivation, self-esteem, and academic development is  
emphasized. These variables operate as mechanisms through which mentoring programs influence students’  
academic success.  
1) Student Integration and Academic Development: Student integration is essential for positive academic  
outcomes. When students feel socially and academically connected to their school, they are more likely to  
participate actively in learning and persevere through difficulties [43, 38]. Peer mentoring supports this  
integration by providing structured opportunities for interaction and the development of supportive peer  
networks. Previous studies show that integrated students exhibit higher engagement and better academic  
performance [29, 47]. Therefore, the hypothesis is stated as follows:  
H1: Student integration significantly influences the academic development outcomes among university students  
in Malaysia.  
2) Academic Motivation and Academic Development: Academic motivation is a critical driver of persistence  
and achievement. Peer mentoring enhances motivation by providing goal-setting strategies, constructive  
feedback, and positive reinforcement [42, 49]. Observing successful mentors creates vicarious experiences  
that strengthen mentees’ belief in their ability to succeed, consistent with Social Learning Theory. Empirical  
evidence supports the notion that motivated students exhibit better study habits, higher GPA, and greater  
commitment to academic tasks [14, 7, 45]. Therefore, the study proposes a hypothesis that:  
H2: Academic motivation significantly influences the academic development outcomes among university  
students in Malaysia.  
3) Self-Esteem and Academic Development: Self-esteem influences students’ confidence in their academic  
abilities and their willingness to engage in challenging tasks [37, 7]. Peer mentoring programs improve self-  
esteem through validation, encouragement, and emotional support. Mentors act as role models,  
demonstrating effective coping strategies and reinforcing mentees’ confidence in their academic potential  
[41, 22, 39]. Past studies indicate that increased self-esteem leads to proactive learning behaviours, resilience,  
and improved educational outcomes [7, 10]. Hence, a hypothesis is proposed that:  
H3: Self-esteem significantly influences the academic development outcomes among university students in  
Malaysia.  
Fig. 1 Proposed Conceptual Framework  
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY  
This study employs a quantitative research design and a survey to examine the impact of peer mentoring  
programs on academic development among university students. A quantitative approach is appropriate as it  
allows for systematic measurement of variables and statistical testing of hypotheses [3, 42, 31]. The design is  
cross-sectional, capturing data at a single point in time to assess relationships between peer mentoring and  
academic outcomes [3, 47]. The target population comprises undergraduate students at private universities  
Page 695  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
located in Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia, including both mentors and mentees who have participated in peer  
mentoring programs. This population was selected because it represents diverse academic disciplines and year  
levels, ensuring comprehensive insights into the effectiveness of mentoring initiatives.  
A sample size of 150 students is expected to provide adequate representation across different programs and year  
levels. The study employs stratified random sampling, dividing the population into strata based on academic  
program and year of study. This method ensures proportional representation and minimizes sampling bias,  
thereby enhancing the generalizability of findings [5, 3, 29]. Data will be collected using a structured  
questionnaire developed based on past studies. The questionnaire consists of three sections:  
Section A: Demographic information (e.g., age, gender, program, year of study).  
Section B: Independent variables (student integration, academic motivation, self-esteem).  
Section C: Dependent variable (academic development).  
The instrument features both closed-ended and Likert-scale questions to gauge respondents’ perceptions and  
experiences. Participants will respond using a five-point Likert scale, from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly  
Agree). This approach transforms subjective experiences into numerical data, allowing for statistical analysis  
and hypothesis testing [40, 31]. Data will be analysed with SPSS and SmartPLS. SPSS will handle descriptive  
statistics (such as mean and standard deviation) and inferential tests (such as correlation and regression analyses)  
to explore relationships between variables [1, 31]. Reliability will be assessed using Cronbach’s alpha in SPSS  
to measure internal consistency [1, 10]. SmartPLS will be employed for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation  
Modeling (PLS-SEM) to validate the framework and examine relationships among constructs. This combined  
approach ensures comprehensive statistical validation and evaluation of both measurement and structural models  
[33, 49, 45].  
Expected Contributions  
This study expands the use of Social Learning Theory to peer mentoring in Malaysian higher education. While  
the theory has been extensively applied in behavioural and educational studies, incorporating it into peer  
mentoring research offers fresh perspectives on how observational learning, modelling, and reinforcement  
influence academic development. By linking peer mentoring to variables such as student integration, motivation,  
and self-esteem, the research offers a solid framework for understanding how mentoring enhances academic  
success. The model advances current knowledge by demonstrating how self-efficacy, a crucial aspect of Social  
Learning Theory, shapes mentoring's impact on educational outcomes. This theoretical contribution paves the  
way for future empirical investigations and cross-cultural analyses.  
Practically, this study offers helpful guidance for universities seeking to enhance student retention and academic  
achievement through effective peer mentoring programs. It emphasizes essential elements such as student  
integration, motivation, and self-esteem, which should be the focus when designing these programs. By  
understanding these factors, university administrators can develop targeted strategies, such as comprehensive  
mentor training, scheduled interactions, and feedback mechanisms, that encourage positive behaviours and  
academic engagement. The results also support the creation of evidence-based policies at the institutional level,  
ensuring mentoring initiatives are both effective and research-informed. Overall, this research serves as a  
blueprint for developing sustainable mentoring systems that boost students’ academic success and well-being.  
CONCLUSION  
This conceptual paper presents a framework explaining how peer mentoring programs influence university  
students' academic development in Malaysia. Drawing on Social Learning Theory, the framework emphasizes  
observational learning, modelling, and reinforcement as primary mechanisms through which mentoring fosters  
academic achievement. It highlights student integration, motivation, and self-esteem as core components,  
providing a theoretically robust and practically useful model for understanding peer mentoring dynamics.  
Page 696  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
The framework advances theory by applying Social Learning Theory to structured peer mentoring in higher  
education, providing insights into how self-efficacy and social modelling function beyond traditional classrooms.  
In practice, it guides universities in creating evidence-based mentoring programs to increase academic  
engagement, boost performance, and support student well-being.  
Future research should commence with pilot empirical studies to refine and validate the proposed framework  
prior to large-scale implementation. It is essential to incorporate context-specific elements including institutional  
policies, dominant learning styles, and cultural norms to enhance the framework’s applicability across diverse  
educational settings. Furthermore, the model should be extended to account for additional environmental and  
psychological factors, such as learning climate and social support, which may significantly influence the  
effectiveness of peer mentoring.  
Subsequent investigations should aim to provide empirical evidence that supports the standardization of peer  
mentoring procedures within academic institutions, guided by data derived from the validated framework.  
Finally, adopting mixed-methods research designs will enable a more comprehensive understanding of  
mentoring relationships by integrating quantitative outcomes with qualitative insights.  
REFERENCES  
1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S. A. (2024). Reliability analysis: Application of  
Cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. In Pioneering the future: Delving into e-learning’s landscape  
(pp. 114–119). Universiti Teknologi Mara.  
2. Al Aqeel, S., & Alhumaid, H. K. (2024). Undergraduate university students mentoring program:  
Experiences  
of  
mentors  
and  
mentees.  
Frontiers  
in  
Education,  
9.  
3. Al Yahyaei, A., Natarajan, J. R., Seshan, V., Joseph, M. A., Valsaraj, B. P., & Al Abri, F. H. (2024). The  
usefulness of peer tutoring and its impact on nursing students’ academic performance, psychological  
empowerment,  
and  
satisfaction:  
Pre-post  
design.  
SAGE  
Open  
Nursing.  
4. Alghamdi, S. A., Aljaffer, M. A., Alahmari, F. S., Alasiri, A. B., Alkahtani, A. H., Alhudayris, F. S., &  
Alhusaini, B. A. (2023). The impact of low self-esteem on academic achievement and related behaviors  
among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 44(6), 613–620.  
5. Almulhim, F. A., Iqbal, K., Al Samman, F. M., Ali, A., &Almazah, M. M. (2024). An optimal estimation  
approach for stratified random sampling using two auxiliary attributes, with applications in the  
agricultural, demographic, financial, and education sectors. Heliyon, 10, e37234.  
6. Alonso García, M. A., & García, M. A. (2024). Effectiveness of peer mentoring on university dropout  
7. Amador Campos, J. A., Peró Cebollero, M., Feliu Torruella, M., Pérez González, A., Cañete Massé, C.,  
Jarne Esparcia, A. J., Triadó Ivern, X., & Guàrdia Olmos, J. (2023). Mentoring and research self-efficacy  
of doctoral students:  
A
psychometric approach. Education Sciences, 13(4), 358.  
8. Ayoobzadeh, M. (2023). Peer mentoring and doctoral student retention: A longitudinal study. Higher  
9. Belmekki, M. (2025). The learning, teaching, and assessment of critical thinking in higher education.  
10. Brock, H., et al. (2025). Peer2Me – Impact of peer support on self-efficacy in young adult cancer  
11. Dost, G., Tuffley, D., & Vercoe, C. (2023). Understanding higher education students’ sense of belonging  
12. Egele, E., & Stark, S. (2024). The mediating role of self-efficacy and outcome expectations in the  
relationship between peer context and academic engagement: A social cognitive theory perspective.  
Page 697  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
13. Farhan, M. A., Makkiyah, F. A., Hadiwiardjo, Y. H., et al. (2025). Exploring the correlation between  
academic achievement and self-regulated learning on critical thinking in undergraduate medical students.  
14. Gonçalves, J. C., Duarte, A. M., Marques Pinto, A., Paulino, P., Figueira, C. P., Ferreira, P. A., Hagá, S.,  
Barros, A., Pereira, N. S., Da Luz, R. A., & Amaral, A. (2025). Mentoring for well-being, engagement,  
and academic achievement in higher education students. Frontiers in Education.  
15. Hibbs, A., & Smith, J. (2025). Self-confidence and perceived importance of pre-arrival experiences  
among  
16. Hofmans, L., & van den Bos, W. (2022). Social learning across adolescence: A Bayesian neurocognitive  
perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 58, 101151.  
first-year  
students.  
Journal  
of  
Further  
and  
Higher  
Education.  
17. Idris, M. H. S., & Johari, K. S. (2024). Perception and self-efficacy of students in the peer mentoring  
program (PRS). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(6), 217–  
18. Ikmal, M., Sallehatul, A., Intan, I., Mohd, F., & Hardiyanti, Z. (2025). The educational challenges among  
private university students in Klang Valley area during the pandemic. International Journal of Advanced  
Computer Science and Applications, 11(6), 1–10.  
19. Ikmal, M., & Grace, D. (2023). The challenges of educational environment on virtual learning among  
undergraduate students during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Academic Research in  
i2/16884  
20. Kenney, T., & O’Halloran, K. C. (2024). The impact of student satisfaction and sense of belongingness  
on academic success and performance in undergraduate science majors. Journal of Interdisciplinary  
21. Krishna, L. K. R., Kwok, H. Y. F., Ravindran, N., et al. (2024). A systematic scoping review of mentoring  
support on professional identity formation. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1380.  
22. Le, H. G., & Sok, C. (2024). The benefits of peer mentoring in higher education: Findings from a  
systematic review. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (31).  
23. Lefferts Mohn, L. (2023). Applying social learning theory in higher education mentoring programs: A  
conceptual review. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(7), 112–130.  
https://doi.org/10.5590/JERP.2023.13.7.09  
24. Lestari, A. D. P., & Antika, E. R. (2023). Self-esteem and peer social support: How do they contribute to  
high school students’ academic hardiness? Pamomong: Journal of Islamic Educational Counseling, 4(2),  
25. Liu, T., Pang, P. C. I., & Lam, C. K. (2024). Public health education using social learning theory: A  
26. López, M. M., Verdugo, M. Á., & Fornés, J. M. (2024). Social integration, subjective well-being, and  
dropout intention: A predictive model in higher education. Revista de Psicología.  
27. López, E. F., Huerta, A. H., Torres, G. M., et al. (2025). Mentorship and outreach: Exploring students’  
feedback to improve Men of Color retention programs. Innovative Higher Education.  
28. Maluenda Albornoz, J., Berríos Riquelme, J., Infante Villagrán, V., & Lobos Peña, K. (2023). Perceived  
social support and engagement in first-year students: The mediating role of belonging during COVID-  
29. Marzoratti, A., & Evans, T. M. (2024). Why and how to collect representative study samples in  
educational neuroscience research. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 35, 100231.  
30. Naidoo, K., Plummer, L., McKean, M., Mack, A., Bowdle, G. K., Mullins, M. A., & Gore, S. (2022).  
Virtual faculty and peer mentoring to promote social belonging among minoritized physical therapist and  
Page 698  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
31. Nallaluthan, K., Kamaruddin, S., Thurasamy, R., Ghouri, A. M., &Kanapathy, K. (2024). Quantitative  
data analysis using PLS-SEM (SmartPLS): Issues and challenges in ethical consideration. International  
32. Ni, J., Shi, Y., Sun, J., & Wu, Q. (2024). The effect of self-esteem on college students’ learning adaptation:  
A chain mediation analysis of self-efficacy and learning burnout. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,  
33. Pereira, L. M., Rodrigues, V. S., & Freires, F. G. M. (2024). Use of partial least squares structural equation  
modeling (PLS SEM) to improve plastic waste management. Applied Sciences, 14(2), 628.  
34. Pinkney, J. (2024). A case study of the intersections of peer mentoring at a Hispanic-serving institution:  
Implications for transfer students. Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 12(2), 1–14.  
35. Prummer, M., & Kogler, M. (2024). The role of mentoring in developing leaders’ emotional  
36. Riley, E. D., Chur, E., Gandhi, M., et al. (2024). Lessons for expanding virtual mentoring in academic  
medical institutions: A qualitative study among senior mentors. BMC Medical Education, 24, 934.  
37. Salman, H. D., Mahdad, A., Khalifa Al Hashmy, R. N., &Manshaee, G. (2024). Predicting students’  
academic performance based on academic self-concept, academic resilience, academic engagement,  
emotional self-regulation, and self-esteem. Journal of Adolescent and Youth Psychological Studies,  
38. Sá, M. J. (2023). Student academic and social engagement in the life of the academy—a lever for  
retention and persistence in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(3), 269.  
39. Sedigh, A., et al. (2024). The effect of a peer mentoring program on clinical academic progress, self-  
confidence, and stress among operating room students. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 542.  
40. Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). PLS SEM for multivariate analysis: A practical guide to educational research  
using SmartPLS. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(3), 353–365.  
41. Sun, T. (2025). Exploring key factors in mentoring relationships in Malaysian higher education  
institutions: A case study of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research  
i1/25027  
42. Torres, J., Chen, D., & Peixoto, B. (2025). Effect of peer mentoring programs on academic motivation  
and school belonging among first-generation learners. KMAN Counseling& Psychology Nexus, 3, 1–10.  
43. Versteeg, M., Kappe, R. F., & Knuiman, C. (2022). Predicting student engagement: The role of academic  
belonging, social integration, and resilience during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. Frontiers in  
44. Williams, C. J., Chen, J. M., Quirion, A., & Hoeft, F. (2024). Peer mentoring for students with learning  
disabilities: The importance of shared experience on students’ social and emotional development.  
45. Woreta, G. T., & Row, G. (2025). The mediating role of self-efficacy and outcome expectations in the  
relationship between peer academic norms and academic engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 681.  
46. Yusof, K., Ahmad Shah, N., & Abdul Rauf, R. K. (2022). Fostering the academic performance of private  
university students through a mentoring programme. In H. H. Kamaruddin et al. (Eds.), Reimagining  
resilient sustainability 3, 438–452. European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences.  
47. Zhai, Y., & Carney, J. V. (2024). The role of mental health and protective factors in student academic  
persistence and retention during  
a
global crisis. Global Mental Health, 11, e15.  
Page 699  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
48. Zhang, F., Xu, X., Peng, W., & Guo, C. (2024). Educational expectations and academic persistence  
among rural adolescents: The protective role of high self-esteem. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 888.  
49. Zhou, F., & Ahmad, R. A. H. (2025). The impact of learning motivation on students’ academic  
performance: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Education, Humanities, and Social  
Research, 5(2), 36–40.  
Page 700