INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Towards an Inquiry into Impedances to Harmonious Inclusion of  
Traditional Abattoir Requirements into Modern Abattoir  
Architecture in Northern Nigeria: A Complex Cultural Context.  
Chiroma, Habu Amina1, Hussaini, Udale Ibrahim1, Isa, A. Abdul1, Umar, Aminu1, Agwu, Kelechi  
Destiny2, Okonkwo, Moses Madubueze2  
1Faculty of Environmental Technology, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria.  
2Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100586  
Received: 07 December 2025; Accepted: 14 December 2025; Published: 25 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
It was because architecture must unite delight with utilitarian aspects of commodity and firmness that it proved  
somewhat recalcitrant to fitting it into the new classification of ‘les beaux arts’ developed in the eighteenth  
century. Thus, the artistry of architecture (the art in architecture) is only incidental to its primary service in  
efficiently providing space for human activity- for abattoir activity. So, the implications of sociocultural and  
physical pre-existences in abattoir architecture in Northern Nigeria are not only significant but also include  
environmental concerns, public health risks, sociocultural factors, and infrastructure deficits. The current  
inquiry, therefore, is directed towards the study of the complex interplay of the traditional and the modern, the  
impedances of harmonious inclusion of traditional abattoir requirements into modern abattoir architecture  
standards in Northern Nigeria. It captures lived experiences, perceptions, and operational practices of  
stakeholders in the region, and evolves in its findings three key thematic groupings: policy and regulatory issues,  
technical and operational challenges, and cultural and social factors.  
Keywords: abattoir, infrastructure, public health, culture  
INTRODUCTION  
A typical Northern Nigerian slaughterhouse practice is influenced by cultural factors. Beef production in the  
region is based on trusted procedure according to the sharia law. Religion is the root and main source of the  
culture and ethics; Islam has also laid down rules for humane slaughter (Aidaros 2013). Culture has become a  
major factor in planning abattoir discourse. Acceptance of modern standard functions and facility utilization has  
become difficult in the region. Modern facilities provided in many abattoirs are not being utilized due to cultural  
influence; such abattoirs include Bauchi Modern Meat Processing Plant established in 1964 and Wambai  
Abattoir in Kano metropolis established almost sixty (60) years ago (Jolaosho 2024). In some abattoirs where  
modern facilities are provided, there is negligence and poor utilization problems (Kwaghe, 2016). Failure to  
utilize standard components has led to dilapidation of abattoir facilities and, these abattoirs include those in  
Mayanka, Kara, Zango and Kawo located at the North-West region of Nigeria (Lawan et al., 2013). Most abattoir  
designs are obsolete and without uniformity and inconsistent to government policies (Kwaghe et al., 2016); most  
of these abattoirs are composed of lairs, stalls, and undefined spaces.  
Abattoir modernization is facing serious challenges in this region because the modern functions and facility  
organization have become unfamiliar to the indigenous users/operators. Modernization process in general was  
developed in the framework of Western liberalism (Fitzgerald, 2010). It is a process of socio-cultural  
transformation and a thorough going process of change involving values, norms, institutions, and structures  
(Bhuyan, 2020). Many of the controls on the slaughter procedure were implemented through religious  
prohibitions and rituals. the four methods that are most prevalent internationally are halal (Muslim), kosher  
(Jewish), industrial (stunned) slaughter, and Jhatka (Sheik, the least used of the four) (Aghwan, & Mac  
Regenstein 2019). The requirements of ‘halal’ Islamic ritual slaughter—impose their own set of procedural and  
Page 7556  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
documentation standards. True halal compliance mandates that animals be healthy at the time of slaughter, that  
the slaughterer invoke the name of God (tasmiyah) (Armanios & Ergene, 2018), and that the bleed‑out process  
follow prescribed methods. These steps cannot be sacrificed on the altar of speed or mechanization, yet  
industrial‑scale operations seek efficiencies through partial mechanization of hoisting, stunning, and carcass  
splitting. The resulting tension generates critical questions: How can facilities ensure that every animal is both  
ritually compliant and processed under hygienic conditions? Who certifies that dual compliance, and by what  
evidentiary standards? With the growing consciousness on abattoir hygiene and meat safety by meat consumers,  
it is essential to address the collective desires of the people. A fitting architectural design and appropriate  
administrative structure are key to safety of abattoir and meat products (Buhari et al., 2020). Spatial planning of  
a function depends on the users’ needs and aspirations and their socio-cultural background (Olotua, 2016). It is  
quite clear that for any modern abattoir system to survive and thrive in the Northern Nigeria, and indeed  
anywhere, the local stakeholders must be carried along from planning stage (Jolaosho, 2024). Some key  
implications of the foregoing are the need to inquire further into possible impedances of a harmonious inclusion  
of stakeholders’ cultural considerations, persistent hygiene lapses, food safety and ritual integrity, into modern  
abattoir sustainable development policy for the Northern Nigeria.  
Specificity Of Impedances in Traditional Considerations  
In abattoir architecture, design and development, impedance would refer to the opposition or resistance to the  
flow of traditional requirements and considerations into the process and product of modern abattoir development  
in Northern Nigeria. Specific examples of such traditional considerations that might be impeded include:  
1. Halal slaughter practices: Ensuring compliance with Islamic guidelines for animal slaughter.  
2. Traditional meat processing methods: Incorporating spaces for traditional processing techniques, such as  
dehairing, evisceration, deboning and smoke skinning/drying.  
3. Cultural and symbolic elements: Integrating cultural symbols, patterns, or motifs into the abattoir  
architecture; and  
4. Ventilation: Regarding the high temperatures, there should be adequate ventilation to overcome excess heat,  
steam, condensation, odor, in the abattoir building designs.  
As will be explained further below, addressing these impedances by way of their harmonious inclusion in modern  
abattoir architecture in Northern Nigeria would require a nuanced approach, balancing modernization with  
cultural sensitivity and awareness.  
Some Intersecting Factors in Abattoir Architecture in The Region  
● Environmental Concerns:  
Abattoirs can have significant environmental impacts, including water pollution, air pollution, and waste  
generation.  
● Public Health Risks:  
Poorly designed abattoirs can pose public health risks, including the spread of diseases and contamination of  
meat. Food‑safety concerns derive from both public‑health priorities and economic incentives. Meat-borne  
pathogens such as Salmonella, E.ꢀcoli, and Brucella impose risks to consumers and can trigger costly trade  
restrictions when outbreaks occur (Mohammed et al., 2011).  
● Sociocultural Factors:  
Abattoir design should consider local cultural and social norms, such as religious practice-specifically, halal  
slaughter practices and traditional meat processing methods.  
Page 7557  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
● Infrastructure Deficits:  
Many abattoirs in Northern Nigeria lack basic infrastructure, including clean water, sanitary, and waste  
management facilities [researchgate.net; nih.gov; archdaily.com]. In response to public health risks, government  
agencies and international development partners have promoted standardized infrastructure—concrete floors,  
controlled drainage, and holding pens—to interrupt contamination pathways. Yet resource constraints,  
intermittent power supply, and high throughput during festive seasons often undermine full compliance with  
Codex Alimentarius–inspired guidelines.  
● Industrial Regulation:  
Industrial regulation ushers in a techno‑bureaucratic regime focused on traceability, documentation, and  
measurable performance indicators—throughput per hour, microbial counts on surfaces, and the volume of  
effluent treated (Sahoo, 2013). Regulatory bodies such as the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) and state  
veterinary services deploy inspection checklists that emphasize structural features and record‑keeping. Yet these  
checklists often treat halal certification as an ancillary “social” requirement rather than integrate it into the core  
quality‑management system (Hidayati et al., 2024).  
At the intersection of these factors, they create both friction and opportunity. Friction appears when, for instance,  
an emphasis on rapid processing to meet industrial metrics compromises the ritual prerequisites of halal  
slaughter, or when hygienic protocols—such as pre‑slaughter stunning—are contested by religious authorities.  
Conversely, opportunity arises in harmonization: designing standard operating procedures that embed tasmiyah  
recitation at the slaughter station, or developing joint inspection protocols in which veterinary officers and halal  
certifiers conduct synchronized audits. Such integrative strategies promise to enhance market access—for  
example, enabling Northern Nigerian meat producers to enter higher‑value export markets that demand both  
sanitary certification and halal accreditation.  
Northern Nigeria’s slaughterhouse network ranges from small, traditional facilities serving village markets to  
larger, municipally managed abattoirs that supply urban population centres (Ekpunobi et al., 2024). Historically,  
slaughtering was conducted in open-air “karuwai” or “kasuwan nama” (meat markets) under minimal  
infrastructural provision. Over the past three decades, pursuant to including the above stated intersecting factors  
in abattoir development in the region, state governments—particularly in Kaduna, Kano, and Sokoto—have  
invested in purpose‐built abattoirs with concrete floors, drainage systems, and designated waste‐disposal areas  
to reduce zoonotic risks and improve hygiene.  
Operational Typology of Abattoirs  
Traditional or informal slaughter points remain ubiquitous across the rural and peri‑urban landscapes of Northern  
Nigeria, operating with minimal built infrastructure and oversight. These sites typically comprise open‑air slabs  
or cleared patches of ground adjacent to local markets, where butchers—organized in small, kinship‑based  
teams—employ hand‑held knives to slaughter livestock directly on the slab itself (Mohammed et al., 2015).  
Waste blood and visceral offal are often discharged into nearby ditches or onto open fields, creating significant  
environmental contamination and zoonotic‑disease risks. In the absence of structured drainage or cold‑storage  
facilities, meat is usually presented for sale under ambient conditions, and tool sanitation practices are confined  
to informal rinsing or wiping of knives between animals. Halal compliance at these locations is largely  
self‑certified, with the lead butcher reciting the tasmiyah (invocation of God’s name) without external  
verification. Government veterinary officers seldom conduct inspections due to resource limitations, leaving  
these sites outside the ambit of formal hygiene regulation but vital to local livelihoods due to their low capital  
requirements.  
Semi‑formal abattoirs represent an intermediate category, bridging the gap between village slabs and fully  
industrialized facilities (Oruonye, 2015). Typically constructed and managed by local government councils or  
state agricultural ministries, these abattoirs serve towns of approximately 50,000 to 200,000 inhabitants and  
incorporate basic hygiene infrastructure, including concrete flooring and graded drainage channels leading to  
soak‑away pits or rudimentary treatment ponds. Communal holding pens provide temporary accommodation for  
Page 7558  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
livestock, although stocking densities often exceed recommended thresholds. Strange facilities are provided at  
wrong position, some of these introduced to satisfy their traditional ways of operation are part of cultural norms  
and values. As a result, wrong facilities are provided in wrong places causing construction of failed abattoirs.  
Leading to the problem of poor organization of spaces for processing activities. failure to utilize modern facilities  
where provided, and lack of compliance to the modern standards of practices (Akpabio et al., 2015; Douglas et  
al., 2013; Jolaosho, 2024). Thereby exacerbating animal stress and cross‑contamination potential. Water supply  
is facilitated through communal taps, and some sites feature basic chilling rooms; however, unreliable power  
grids and frequent generator failures render refrigeration intermittent. Operational staffing usually includes a  
small team of slaughter attendants and one or two junior veterinary inspectors who conduct post‑mortem  
examinations for visible lesions, yet systematic microbial testing is not routine. Halal certification in these  
facilities is typically performed by itinerant clerics—especially during peak religious festivals—and is  
documented through hand‑written permits. The coexistence of hygiene audits and sporadic halal inspections  
often creates scheduling conflicts that can delay throughput and undermine operational efficiency.  
At the apex of the typology lie the industrial‑scale abattoirs situated in major Northern cities such as Kano and  
Kaduna (Lawan et al., 2013). These facilities aspire to meet export‑ready standards by processing hundreds of  
large ruminants per day through mechanized hoist‑and‑rail systems that convey carcasses through sequential  
slaughter, dressing, and chilling bays. On‑site effluent treatment plants—often comprising anaerobic ponds—  
are intended to mitigate environmental pollution, though maintenance backlogs frequently reduce treatment  
efficiency.  
The Traditional Slaughter Ritual Practice in the Region  
In Northern Nigeria, abattoir operation procedures are guided by social orientation such as normative  
behavioural patterns because of their religion beliefs, social values, and methodology. Halal certification has  
evolved from an informal, community-based endorsement of ritual compliance to a more structured—but still  
variegated—system of accreditation that seeks to reconcile one of the major cultural factors—religion. Halal  
ritual is practiced according to Islamic ritual to renders the beef ‘Halal’ safe for consumption according to Sharia  
principles. (Annabi & Ahmed, 2015). Ground or floor slaughter is considered as the most satisfactory workable  
proposition for butchers satisfy the traditional rites of halal slaughter for spontaneous bleeding of animal after  
humane slaughter. This practice has become part of the people’s culture, the religious mandates with industrial  
and public-health imperatives brings a trustworthy halal system of beef production. At its most basic level, halal  
certification attests that an animal was healthy at the time of slaughter, that the slaughterer invoked the tasmiyah  
(the name of God) at the moment of incision, and that the bleed-out process adhered to prescribed anatomical  
and methodological requirements (Hidayati et al., 2024). In village contexts, this process is self-administered:  
master butchers trained through kinship networks assume responsibility for reciting the invocation and  
performing the slaughter. Yet as consumer demand for formal documentation has grown—driven by both urban  
markets and export ambitions—local Islamic scholars, state halal boards, and private certifiers have sought to  
formalize what was once a tacit ritual practice.  
State-sanctioned bodies such as the Kano State Halal Certification Board and emerging associations in Kaduna  
and Sokoto have introduced numbered certificates, audit checklists, and traceability documents that attempt to  
standardize the ritual process across multiple abattoir typologies. These bodies typically require slaughter  
facilities to register, pay annual fees, and allow periodic inspections by teams comprising both religious scholars  
and veterinary officers. Inspection criteria extend beyond the recitation of tasmiyah to include facility hygiene,  
animal welfare conditions, and record-keeping protocols—an acknowledgement that religious compliance and  
food-safety standards are inextricably linked. However, the enforcement capacity of these boards varies  
markedly: while larger, urban abattoirs may undergo quarterly audits with written reports, many semi-formal  
and informal sites experience only ad hoc visits during festival seasons, leaving compliance uneven and  
documentation sparse.  
In traditional or informal slaughter points, halal certification remains largely implicit (Fuseini, 2022), with little  
external verification beyond the butcher’s reputation in the community. The absence standard facilities defined  
spaces for specific operation activities and important auxiliary facilities poses both a health risk and a  
reputational challenge to abattoirs. Some of these facilities include animal and meat examination facilities,  
Page 7559  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
quarantine, cold-storage systems, structured waste management, Ventilating equipment, Special illumination  
among others. Informal butchers may resist formal certification processes, perceiving them as costly or intrusive,  
and often lack the record-keeping capacity to satisfy auditors. Consequently, certifying bodies may either bypass  
these points or categorize their outputs under special “small-scale” endorsements that carry caveats regarding  
limited requirements oversight.  
Semi-formal abattoirs occupy a more ambiguous position in the certification ecosystem. Though these facilities  
possess concrete floors, drainage systems, and communal holding pens—features that align with basic hygienic  
requirements—power outages and intermittent refrigeration undermine consistent cold-chain management.  
Certification audits in semi-formal settings thus grapple with dual objectives: verifying the ritual slaughter  
process and ensuring that temperature controls and effluent handling meet minimal food-safety thresholds.  
Auditors often collaborate in pairs—one religious scholar focusing on slaughter protocols, and one veterinary  
officer assessing facility hygiene—yet the lack of an integrated audit framework can lead to disjointed reporting  
and conflicting recommendations.  
Industrial-scale abattoirs, by contrast, have greater incentive and capacity to integrate halal certification into  
their broader quality-management  
systems (Fuseini, 2020). These  
facilities typically  
maintain  
standardoperating-procedure manuals that reference both Codex Alimentarius guidelines and state halal  
standards, and they employ dedicated halal-compliance officers who liaise with certifying boards. Mechanized  
hoist-and-rail systems facilitate precise control over bleed-out, while cold-chain rooms and effluent-treatment  
plants support the hygienic environment auditors require. Nevertheless, tensions persist between stun-first  
protocols favored for microbial reduction and the requirement—advocated by many Islamic authorities—that  
animals remain conscious at the moment of slaughter. Some industrial operators negotiate ad hoc exemptions,  
incorporating conditional written attestations from certifiers; others retrofit stunning equipment to comply with  
specific religious rulings on reversible stunning. These pragmatic adaptations illustrate the ongoing negotiation  
at the intersection of ritual fidelity, food-safety objectives, and industrial regulation.  
Industrial Standards for Development of Abattoirs in Nigeria  
Industrial standards for development of abattoirs in Nigeria derive from both international codes and national  
regulatory frameworks, each prescribing a comprehensive set of requirements for facility design, process control,  
and documentation. At the apex of the international hierarchy sits the Codex Alimentarius Code of Hygienic  
Practice for Meat (CXC 58-2005) (Sahoo, 2013), which articulates a risk-based approach to meat hygiene  
encompassing ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection, structural prerequisites, and sanitation measures  
throughout the slaughter chain. Complementing this, the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)  
system is recognized by the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) as the preferred management framework  
for identifying, monitoring, and controlling biological, chemical, and physical hazards in meat-processing  
operations. At the national level, the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control  
(NAFDAC) promulgates Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) guidelines—spanning factory siting,  
equipment design, and personnel hygiene—that abattoirs must comply with to secure market authorization and  
maintain export eligibility.  
With regard to facility infrastructure, industrial standards mandate the segregation of clean and dirty processes  
through distinct zoning, graded concrete flooring with impervious surfaces, and sloped drainage channels  
leading to effluent-treatment ponds or municipal sewers. Mechanized hoist-and-rail systems are prescribed to  
transport carcasses sequentially through bleeding, dressing, and chilling stations while minimizing manual  
handling and cross-contamination. Ventilation and lighting requirements are detailed, ensuring sufficient air  
exchange to control ambient humidity and microbial growth, and adequate illumination to facilitate thorough  
inspection and hygienic work practices. Equipment surfaces must be constructed of non-toxic, corrosion-  
resistant materials that can withstand routine sanitization without degradation, thereby aligning with both Codex  
structural standards and SON’s quality-systems ethos.  
Process-control protocols under industrial standards extend beyond structural design into rigorous monitoring  
of critical parameters. Ante-mortem inspection stations are mandated to verify animal health, species  
identification, and welfare conditions, with any suspect animal diverted for further veterinary examination or  
Page 7560  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
condemnation. Post-mortem inspection focuses on the detection of pathological lesions, microbial swabbing of  
carcasses and contact surfaces, and verification of bleed-out efficacy. HACCP plans must delineate critical  
control points— such as carcass chilling temperature, pH decline, and microbial load thresholds—and define  
corrective actions in the event of deviations, all documented in standardized logs. These process controls  
facilitate alignment between hygienic imperatives and the need for verifiable, repeatable procedures that  
underpin both public-health objectives and halal certification audits.  
Traceability and documentation form another pillar of industrial standards, requiring comprehensive  
recordkeeping at each stage of the slaughter-to-market chain (Agriculture and Resource Management Council  
of Australia and New Zealand. Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management & Primary  
Industries Standing Committee, 2001). Abattoirs must maintain batch-level records of animal source, transport  
conditions, slaughter date and time, and inspection outcomes. These records enable rapid recall in case of  
contamination events and support export certification regimes. Importantly, they also provide the evidentiary  
basis for halal certifiers to confirm that each animal underwent the prescribed ritual procedures under sanitary  
conditions. The integration of electronic traceability systems—even at a rudimentary level of QR-coded carcass  
tags—exemplifies an opportunity to harmonize industrial transparency with religious accreditation, addressing  
the disjointed audit trails previously observed in both semi-formal and industrial-scale facilities.  
Enforcement of these industrial standards is distributed across multiple agencies. SON conducts factory-level  
certification audits and issues the Nigerian Industrial Standards mark, while NAFDAC inspectors perform  
periodic inspections and review cGMP compliance as a condition of product registration. The National  
Agricultural Quarantine Service (NAQS) oversees animal‐health controls and ante‐mortem inspection at entry  
points, ensuring that live animals and meat products satisfy both Nigerian and international sanitary  
requirements. Local government authorities supplement these functions with licensing, sanitation patrols, and  
enforcement of waste-management ordinances. At each regulatory interface, the challenge remains to  
synchronize halal certification processes—traditionally managed by religious boards under state ministries of  
agriculture—into a cohesive quality-management system that upholds both industrial benchmarks and ritual  
fidelity.  
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
The study employed a qualitative research design to explore the complex interplay between traditional abattoir  
requirement and modern abattoir standards in Northern Nigeria. Qualitative inquiry was deemed appropriate  
given the exploratory nature of the research questions, which sought to capture the lived experiences,  
perceptions, and operational practices of stakeholders within diverse abattoir settings. By privileging depth over  
breadth, this approach allowed for a nuanced understanding of both cultural ways practices that shape  
slaughterhouse operations across northern states of Nigeria and modern system of operation.  
Data collection combined structured survey instruments with semi-structured, in-depth interviews to balance  
comparability of responses with the flexibility required to probe emergent themes. A total of 270  
selfadministered questionnaires were distributed to a purposive sample of abattoir operators and meat-market  
users. Of these, 184 completed questionnaires were returned, yielding a response rate of approximately 68  
percent. The questionnaire instrument included both closed-ended items—addressing demographic  
characteristics, facility infrastructure, and familiarity with halal and industrial standards—and open-ended  
prompts inviting participants to recount challenges, best practices, and perceptions of regulatory oversight.  
Complementing the survey data, seventeen key informant interviews were conducted with abattoir operators and  
users across the three states. Interviewees were selected through snowball sampling, beginning with random  
operators at the abattoirs. Semi-structured interview guides enabled the researcher to explore participants’  
procedural routines, decision-making criteria for slaughter protocols, and experiences of audit processes. All  
interviews were audio-recorded—with informed consent—and subsequently transcribed verbatim to preserve  
the richness of participants’ language and contextual detail.  
Page 7561  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
All participants were assured of confidentiality and the voluntary nature of their involvement. Through this  
multi‐method approach, the research gathered robust, contextually grounded data on the operational realities and  
certification practices of Northern Nigerian slaughterhouses.  
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION  
The research produced a number of findings, which have been thematically grouped into policy and regulatory  
issues, technical and operational challenges, cultural and social factors.  
Policy and Regulatory Issues  
The absence of a unified halal certification law in the states studied has engendered a fragmented regulatory  
environment in which multiple agencies—most notably the Halal Certification Authority (HCA), the Standards  
Organisation of Nigeria (SON), and the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control  
(NAFDAC)—operate overlapping but uncoordinated mandates. In practice, abattoir operators seeking halal  
accreditation must navigate competing application procedures, disparate fee structures, and divergent audit  
criteria. Where HCA may prioritize ritual slaughter protocols and traceability, SON’s purview is ostensibly  
limited to industrial quality standards, and NAFDAC emphasizes sanitary handling and labeling, creating a  
compliance matrix that confounds both large‐scale and small‐scale stakeholders.  
Compounding this regulatory confusion is the pervasive weakness of enforcement mechanisms and the fact that  
many promulgated guidelines remain “paper standards” with little practical impact on the ground. Field surveys  
consistently reveal—even the formally registered abattoirs—rarely undergo routine halal or hygiene inspections,  
and where inspections do occur, sanctions for non‐compliance are seldom applied. The 2019 SON regulation,  
which updated numerous industrial codes, conspicuously omitted explicit codification of halal certification  
requirements, thereby relegating religious compliance to an ancillary status outside the central regulatory  
framework. In the absence of statutory backing, halal guidelines issued by SON and NAFDAC lack the force of  
law and cannot be enforced through criminal or administrative penalties. Consequently, both certifiers and  
abattoir operators treat halal standards as voluntary best practices rather than mandatory obligations,  
perpetuating a regulatory lacuna that frustrates efforts to harmonize religious and industrial imperatives.  
● Technical and Operational Challenges:  
A large percentage of the abattoirs visited across Kano, Kaduna, Maiduguri and Bauchi frequently operate  
without essential utilities and infrastructure, undermining both hygiene standards and food-safety outcomes.  
Many facilities lack lairage, defined spaces for slaughter, anti-mortem, and post-mortem facilities. overhead rails  
and hooks, standard evisceration areas, waste treatment plants, designated meat sales section, a reliable supply  
of running water, compelling operators to source water intermittently through costly tanker deliveries or to  
recycle greywater between slaughter cycles. The absence of functional cold-storage units further exacerbates,  
with ambient temperatures often exceeding 30 °C increasing the risk of foodborne pathogens. These  
infrastructural deficits are compounded by deficient waste-management systems. Open drains, uncovered waste  
pits, and accumulating blood-soaked offal create breeding grounds for flies and rodents, while effluent frequently  
overflows into public thoroughfares and watercourses. Such conditions not only violate Codex Alimentarius–  
inspired hygiene codes but also erode consumer confidence in both safety and religious integrity, as unsanitary  
environments cast doubt on the permissibility of the meat for halal consumption.  
A further operational dilemma arises from the clash between industrialized modern slaughter protocols—  
predicated on reversible stunning and mechanization—and the doctrinal requirement in Northern Nigerian halal  
jurisprudence that animals remain conscious at the moment of incision. Industrial abattoir designs commonly  
incorporate electrical stunning units and mechanized restraint systems to minimize animal stress and streamline  
throughput; yet disabling these mechanisms to satisfy ritual stipulations introduces inefficiencies and safety  
hazards. In practice, some facilities resort to manual override of stunners or ad hoc removal of stunning  
electrodes, leading to increased handling times, inconsistent bleed-out quality, and elevated risk of workplace  
injury. Moreover, the lack of an officially recognized reversible-stun technology calibrated to religious standards  
leaves operators in a legal and ethical quandary, forced either to compromise animal-welfare benchmarks or to  
Page 7562  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
risk invalidation of halal certification. This persistent methodological conflict underscores the need for  
contextsensitive engineering solutions and standardized protocols that can reconcile the imperatives of animal  
welfare, industrial efficiency, and religious observance.  
● Cultural and Social Factors:  
72% of respondents perceive that the establishment of centralized, modern abattoirs is a direct threat to the  
longstanding economic roles of traditional butchers within the local communities. Historically, butchers have  
operated mobile or on‐demand slaughter points adjacent to markets, capturing retail margins and maintaining  
direct relationships with customers. The introduction of larger, fee‐based facilities—often located at a distance  
from traditional market centers—undermines these informal networks by imposing licensing costs, transport  
burdens, and competition with larger processors. As a result, many butchers actively resist integration into  
centralized systems, lobbying local authorities, and in some cases engaging in sabotage of abattoir infrastructure  
to preserve their livelihoods. This resistance not only hampers the utilization of hygienic infrastructure but also  
perpetuates the parallel operation of unsanitary informal sites, thereby entrenching public‐health risks and  
frustrating efforts to standardize slaughter practices.  
Compounding this economic resistance is a pervasive lack of awareness among abattoir workers regarding both  
halal protocols and basic principles of good‐slaughter practice.  
Many butchers and support staff receive no formal training in the requirements for invoking the tasmiyah,  
ensuring proper bleed‐out, or maintaining sanitary conditions throughout the slaughter process. Consequently,  
compliance with halal standards often depends on individual butchers’ personal interpretations, leading to  
inconsistent ritual observance and procedural gaps that can compromise both religious permissibility and food  
safety. This low level of protocol literacy is exacerbated by widespread mistrust of modern abattoir operators  
and certification bodies; consumers and workers alike question whether large‐scale facilities genuinely adhere  
to the stringent requirements of halal slaughter. Doubts persist regarding the invocation of the divine name at  
each slaughter station, the involvement of non-Muslim personnel, and the integrity of carcass handling within  
mechanized environments. Such mistrust not only diminishes consumer confidence in certified meat products  
but also undermines the credibility of centralized abattoirs as venues capable of upholding both religious and  
hygienic imperatives.  
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS  
The findings of this inquiry underscore the multifaceted challenges that impede the harmonious inclusion of  
cultural consideration into the development policy for modern abattoir architecture for Northern Nigerian. At  
the policy level, the absence of a unified halal law and the proliferation of competing certifying bodies have  
generated regulatory ambiguity, while the limited codification of religious requirements within national  
industrial regulations has relegated halal compliance to a peripheral consideration. Technically, most slaughter  
facilities remain starved of basic utilities—reliable water supply, continuous power for cold storage, and effluent  
treatment systems—resulting in persistent hygiene lapses that compromise both food-safety and ritual integrity.  
Operational practices are further complicated by the methodological discord between industrial protocols that  
Favor pre-stunning and mechanization, and religious mandates that require animals to be conscious at the  
moment of incision. Socio-cultural dynamics reinforce these technical and regulatory gaps: traditional butchers  
resist centralized, fee-based plants for fear of economic marginalization, while low levels of formal training and  
deep-seated mistrust of large-scale facilities thwart efforts to standardize good-slaughter practices.  
Economically, the high capital and operating costs of modern abattoirs remain prohibitive for small-scale  
operators, even as global and domestic halal markets present lucrative opportunities for value-added, certified  
products.  
To overcome these barriers, a coordinated, multi-stakeholder strategy is imperative to achieve the  
followings:  
1. First, the federal government should enact a comprehensive culture inclusive strategies as guideline and  
part of abattoir developmental policy for NAFDAC and other relevant authorities in Nigeria. This will be  
Page 7563  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
a law that works in harmony with recognized international authorities with similar criteria within their  
core industrial-standards framework, such as FAO, APHCA, WHO. Empowering enforcement agencies  
to sanction non-compliance to standards.  
2. Second, local authorities, in Northern Nigeria, which deal with modular, decentralized abattoir units—  
designed in collaboration with local butcher associations—can facilitate incremental infrastructure  
upgrades while preserving traditional livelihoods.  
3. Third, the introduction and validation of acceptable processes that to replace modern mechanized animal  
slaughter or dressing processes militating against the people’s cultural values, such reversible-stun  
technologies. Consultation with abattoir stakeholders and Islamic scholars, would reconcile cultural issues  
of concern and ritual requirements, enabling standardized workflows in mechanized environments.  
4. Fourth, giving emphasis on design standards for functional spaces and requirements of standard modern  
facilities, in the areas of renewable-energy microgrids and solar-powered cold stores should be prioritized  
to meat safety. Minimize spoilage and stabilize the cold chain, improve efficiency, and reduce operational  
costs.  
5. Finally, targeted capacity-building initiatives—comprising joint training programs for butchers,  
veterinary inspectors, traditional rulers, and other relevant traditional authorities—combined with  
community engagement campaigns led by respected religious figures, will be essential to build trust,  
enhance protocol literacy, and foster a shared commitment to both efficiency and hygienic excellence.  
Implementing these measures especially through public-private partnerships and clear performance  
indicators and discipline will create a sustainable pathway for Northern Nigerian slaughterhouses to meet  
the dual imperatives of culture friendly, and acceptable modern abattoir concept in the region.  
REFERENCES  
1. Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Standing Committee on  
Agriculture and Resource Management & Primary Industries Standing Committee. (2001). Livestock at  
Slaughtering Establishments. CSIRO Pub.  
2. Ankittah Gatttupalli (2025). From Design Fiction to Design Futures: The Challenging Role of  
Architecture in Cultural Production, ArchDaily, www.archdaily.com  
3. Armanios, F., & Ergene, B. A. (2018). Halal Food: A History. Oxford University Press.  
4. Ekpunobi, N., Adesanoye, S., Orababa, O. Q., Adinnu, C. M.-G., Okorie, C., & Akinsuyi, O. S.  
5. (2024). Public health perspective of public abattoirs in Nigeria, challenges and solutions.  
6. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Science, 26(2).  
7. Fuseini, A. (2020). Halal Meat Production and Market Opportunities: A 21st Century Guide to the Halal  
Market. Context Publications.  
8. Fuseini, A. (2022). Halal Slaughter of Livestock: Animal Welfare Science, History and Politics of  
Religious Slaughter. Springer International Publishing.  
9. Hidayati, L., Cheumar, M., Sucipto, S., & Juliana, J. (2024). Integrating Halal Assurance and Quality  
Management: A Strategic Framework for Sustainable Growth in the Food Industry. Jurnal Teknologi dan  
Manajemen Agroindustri, 13(2).  
10. Lawan, M.K., Bello, M., Kwaga, J.K.P., & Raji, M.A. (2013). Evaluation of physical facilities and  
processing operations of major abattoirs in North-western states of Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary  
Sciences, 11(1).  
11. Mohammed, B., Kabiru, L., Kwaga, J., & Abiola, R. M. (2011). Assessment of carcass contamination  
with E. coli O157 before and after washing with water at abattoirs in Nigeria. International Journal of  
Food Microbiology, 150(2-3).  
12. Mohammed, B., Kabiru, L., Tagang, A., & Mohammed, S. (2015). Management of slaughterhouses in  
Northern-Nigeria and the safety of meat produced for human consumption. Food Control, 49. 14.  
Oruonye, E. D. (2015). Challenges of Abattoir Waste Management in Jalingo Metropolis, Nigeria.  
International Journal of Research in Geography, 1(2).  
Page 7564  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
13. Ovuru, K. F., Izah, S. C., Ogidi, O. I., Imarhiagbe, O., & Ogwu, M. C. Slaughterhouse facilities in  
developing nations: sanitation and hydiene practices, microbial contaminants and sustainable  
management system, Springer: Food Science and Biotechnology, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov  
14. Sahoo, J. (2013). Textbook on Abattoir Practices & Animal Byproducts Technology. NarendraPublishing  
House.  
15. Thannapan, S. (2022). Textbook on Abattoir design principal basis of design, module of abattoir, design  
of septic tank for abattoir, Treatment of effluent Textbook LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.  
16. Salisu, I., Yunusa, K., Buhari, H. U., & Dahiru, H. M. (2021). Role of slaughter facilities management in  
zoonoses and safety of meat produced for human consumption in Nigeria: a review, Bulletin of the  
National Research Centre, researchgate.net  
17. Yunxuan, W., Ruikai, Y., & Ibrahim, N. L. B. N. (2025). From Tradition to Modern: Cultural Integration  
and Innovation in Sustainable Architectural Design Education, Journal of Ecohumanism,  
www.researchgate.net  
18. Aghwan, Z. A. & Mac Regenstein J. (2019). Slaughter and practice of different faiths in different  
countries. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 61(3), 111  
Page 7565  
www.rsisinternational.org