INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Development of a Learning Packet on Heat Transfer as  
Supplementary Materials  
Aminah A. Macmod., Elesar V. Malicoban., Monera A. Salic-Hairulla., Vanjoreeh A. Madale., Arlyn R.  
Alcopra., Ariel O. Ellare  
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University –  
Iligan Institute of Technology, Bonifacio Ave. Tibanga, Iligan City, 9200 (Philippines)  
Received: 11 December 2025; Accepted: 20 December 2025; Published: 29 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
Heat transfer is one of the most challenging topics for Grade 7 students due to its abstract nature and persistent  
misconceptions about conduction, convection, and radiation. These difficulties are often exacerbated by limited  
instructional resources, lecture-based teaching, and the lack of contextualized materials that support visualization  
and active learning. This study aimed to develop and validate a printed learning packet on heat transfer as  
supplementary material to support instruction in Grade 7 science. Using a developmental research design guided  
by the 4D Model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate), the study began with a needs assessment  
involving five in-service junior high school science teachers to identify instructional gaps, learning challenges,  
and material requirements. Findings indicated learner misconceptions, difficulty distinguishing the modes of  
heat transfer, and limited opportunities for hands-on activities due to resource constraints. Guided by these  
findings, a printed learning packet incorporating simplified explanations, structured activities, illustrations, and  
real-life applications was developed and evaluated by five validators composed of in-service science teachers  
and science education specialists using a standardized rubric. The evaluation yielded a grand weighted mean of  
2.85, interpreted as Very Highly Valid, with all criteria rated as Very Highly Acceptable. These results indicate  
that the developed learning packet is a pedagogically sound and contextually appropriate supplementary material  
for Grade 7 science instruction. Future studies may implement the packet in classroom settings and examine its  
effectiveness through pre-test and post-test designs and learner feedback.  
Keywords: Heat Transfer, Learning Packet, Supplementary Material, MATATAG Curriculum, Science  
Education, 4D Model.  
INTRODUCTION  
Heat transfer is a fundamental yet challenging topic in junior high school science, requiring students to  
understand how thermal energy moves through conduction, convection, and radiation. However, many learners  
struggle to visualize these processes, often holding misconceptions such as believing that heat and temperature  
are the same or that heat travels as a substance (Adadan & Yavuzkaya, 2018; Sozbilir, 2003). In the Philippine  
context, traditional teaching methods remain heavily lecture-based, limiting opportunities for hands-on and  
inquiry-driven learning (Isa et al., 2020). These challenges become more pronounced in resource-limited schools  
where laboratory tools and multimedia materials are scarce. Research emphasizes that conceptual understanding  
improves when learners are provided with structured, contextualized, and activity-based materials that support  
visualization and active exploration (Mayer, 1974; Kolb, 1984; Awudi & Danso, 2023). Furthermore,  
misconceptions about heat transfer persist when instruction lacks real-world applications and scaffolding aligned  
with students’ developmental levels (Driver et al., 1994; Stylos et al., 2021). In response to these instructional  
gaps, this study developed a printed learning packet grounded in constructivist, experiential, and cognitive  
theories aimed at strengthening conceptual clarity and supporting science teachers in delivering more interactive  
lessons. The material is aligned with the MATATAG Curriculum, which emphasizes contextualized, learner-  
centered science instruction in the Philippines.  
Page 8267  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Objectives of the Study  
This study seeks to achieve:  
1. Conduct a needs assessment to determine teachers’ experiences, challenges, current practices, and  
instructional needs in teaching heat transfer, including the use and potential benefits of supplementary  
printed materials.  
2. Develop a supplementary printed learning packet that integrates conceptual content, guided activities,  
experiments, worksheets, and assessments.  
METHODS  
This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) research design aimed at systematically developing  
and validating a printed learning packet on heat transfer as supplementary material for Grade 7 Science. The  
study was guided by the 4D Model, specifically the Define, Design, and Develop phases, as these were the  
portions completed by the researcher. Five in-service junior high school science teachers participated in the needs  
assessment to determine teachers’ experiences, challenges, current practices, and instructional needs in teaching  
heat transfer, including the use and potential benefits of supplementary printed materials. Five validators  
composed of in-service science teachers and science education specialists evaluated the developed learning  
packet using an adapted and validated evaluation rubric. The instrument covered key domains, including content  
accuracy, curriculum alignment, instructional design, clarity of presentation, and relevance of activities. Each  
indicator was rated using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not Acceptable) to 3 (Very Highly Acceptable).  
Weighted means and standard deviations were computed to determine the level of validity and acceptability of  
the developed learning packet.  
Data Gathering Procedure  
Data were gathered through a Needs Assessment Questionnaire adapted from Hadji Shaeef (2023) and the  
validator ratings of the developed learning packet using a standardized evaluation rubric adapted from Araya et  
al. (2024). The questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions designed to elicit teachers’ experiences, current  
teaching practices, observed student difficulties, and suggestions for improving instructional materials on heat  
transfer. The rubric was used by the evaluators to assess the quality and effectiveness of the learning packet  
across key components, including content alignment, instructional design, real-life integration, and assessment  
strategies, ensuring relevance, clarity, and pedagogical appropriateness. Prior to administration, permission from  
the school administration was secured, and participants were informed about the purpose of the study. Responses  
were coded anonymously (e.g., NA:ST1–NA:ST5), collected over a two-week period, and transcribed for  
analysis. Ethical standards were strictly observed to ensure the security and proper handling of all data and  
documents.  
Data Analysis  
The data gathered in this study were analyzed using descriptive statistics to interpret the results of the needs  
assessment and the validator ratings of the developed learning packet. Frequencies and percentages were used  
to summarize the responses of the five science teachers regarding the challenges in teaching heat transfer,  
limitations of existing instructional materials, and areas where students commonly exhibit misconceptions. To  
evaluate the developed learning packet, weighted mean and standard deviation were computed based on the  
rubric ratings given by the validators. These statistical measures determined the clarity, scientific accuracy,  
content alignment, and overall pedagogical quality of the material, with scores interpreted on a scale where the  
highest ratings indicated Very High Validity and High Acceptability. Qualitative comments from validators were  
analyzed through thematic analysis to highlight specific strengths and recommended improvements for the  
learning packet.  
Page 8268  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
Needs Assessment for Science Teachers  
Part I. Experience in Teaching Science (Heat Transfer)  
Table 1. Summary of In-Service Science Teachers’ Responses to the Needs Assessment Survey on Their  
Experience in Teaching Science (Heat Transfer)  
Theme  
Coded for  
Quote  
Challenges  
Due Lack of materials, “Demonstrating the real transfer of heat between objects... Safety  
to  
Limited insufficient  
concerns and limited resources make hands-on demonstrations  
Resources  
Safety  
Constraints  
and equipment,  
safety  
and difficult.” (NA-ST1)  
issues  
lesson  
“Demonstrating the concept is difficult as it can be harmful to let  
students do activities with heat sources.” (NA-ST3)  
affecting  
implementation  
“Some students lack prior knowledge, and insufficient lab materials  
make it challenging to conduct experiments.” (NA-ST2)  
Challenges  
Due Students’ difficulty “Students have difficulty understanding abstract concepts because  
concepts they rely on memorization rather than observation.” (NA-ST4)  
Misunderstanding and low motivation  
to  
Student grasping  
“Students often lose focus during lessons and struggle to visualize  
heat movement. Different learning paces make engagement more  
challenging.” (NA-ST5)  
and  
Engagement  
Low during lessons  
Integration  
Visual  
Experiential  
Learning  
of Use of visual aids, “To overcome these hurdles, effective teaching strategies must  
and demonstrations,  
simulations,  
emphasize sensory experiences through hands-on demonstrations  
and like comparing heat conduction in metal and wood...” (NA-ST1)  
hands-on  
experiences  
“By using visual aids such as showing videos or images and also  
connecting the discussion to everyday experiences.” (NA-ST2)  
Approaches  
“I address students’ difficulties by using simple, hands-on activities  
like heating a metal spoon in hot water for conduction...” (NA-ST4)  
Promotion  
Interactive  
of Encouraging  
active “To help students better understand the concept of heat transfer, I  
and participation, group use videos, simple demonstrations, and interactive activities such  
Student-Centered  
Learning  
work, and discussion as group experiments and games.” (NA-ST5)  
“Real-life examples are the best way to make the topic  
understandable for students, as well as using visual methods like  
modules.” (NA-ST3)  
Combination  
Traditional  
Experiential  
Approaches  
of Lecture and hands-on “I use a mix of lecture and discussion to introduce the concepts,  
and  
followed by simple experiments using available materials to  
observe conduction, convection, and radiation.” (NA-ST4)  
The needs assessment reveals five major themes describing teachers’ experiences in teaching heat transfer,  
highlighting both instructional challenges and the strategies they use to support student learning. First, teachers  
reported significant challenges due to limited resources and safety constraints, which restrict them from  
conducting hands-on experiments. Insufficient laboratory materials and safety risks make it difficult to  
Page 8269  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
demonstrate heat transfer processes effectively. This aligns with Reyes and Alonzo (2020), who found that  
inadequate laboratory resources limit experiential learning and hinder students’ understanding of abstract science  
concepts. Similarly, Mendoza and Villanueva (2023) emphasized that visual and printed instructional materials  
help compensate for the lack of laboratory tools. Kim and Lee (2021) also noted that safety issues often prevent  
hands-on activities, but simulations and structured materials can bridge the gap between theory and practice.  
Second, teachers emphasized student misunderstanding and low engagement, noting that students often rely on  
memorization and struggle to visualize heat movement. The abstract nature of heat transfer contributes to  
disengagement, especially when lessons lack real-life connections. These findings are supported by Santos and  
Villanueva (2020), who reported that purely theoretical instruction leads to poor conceptual understanding.  
Ramirez and Cruz (2021) found that visual demonstrations and real-life examples improve comprehension, while  
Kim and Park (2022) highlighted that multimodal and interactive strategies enhance focus and learning  
outcomes. Additionally, Mendoza and Alonzo (2019) noted that connecting lessons to everyday experiences  
increases motivation and relevance.  
Third, teachers use visual and experiential learning approaches, such as simple experiments, visual aids, and  
everyday analogies, to explain conduction, convection, and radiation. These methods help students transform  
abstract ideas into concrete understanding. This is consistent with Hernandez and Santos (2019), who found that  
hands-on and visual activities strengthen conceptual learning. Lopez and Villanueva (2020) also showed that  
real-life examples enhance application of knowledge, while Kim and Lee (2021) emphasized that visualizations  
help students interpret scientific concepts more accurately. Martinez and Cruz (2022) further demonstrated that  
simulations, videos, and practical demonstrations increase student curiosity and engagement.  
Fourth, teachers prioritize interactive and student-centered learning, using group experiments, collaborative  
tasks, and games to sustain interest and deepen understanding. These strategies support diverse learning styles  
and encourage active participation. This mirrors Tan and Reyes (2019), who found that interactive strategies  
improve retention of complex science concepts. Garcia and Lim (2020) highlighted that student-centered  
approaches promote critical thinking and engagement in middle school science, while Park and Choi (2021)  
observed that integrating games and interactive tasks fosters deeper comprehension of abstract ideas. Santos and  
Velasco (2022) also noted that practical, exploratory activities boost motivation and long-term retention.  
Finally, teachers use a combination of traditional and experiential approaches, starting with lectures for  
foundational knowledge and reinforcing concepts through demonstrations, videos, printed materials, and real-  
life examples. This blended approach helps students understand and apply heat transfer concepts even with  
limited resources. Research supports this strategy: Martin and Santos (2019) found that combining lectures with  
hands-on activities enhances understanding of scientific concepts. Reyes and Velasco (2020) emphasized that  
experiential learning helps students apply abstract ideas. Cruz et al. (2021) showed that using discussions  
alongside demonstrations and printed materials creates a more interactive environment, and Gomez and Lim  
(2022) concluded that blended instruction improves retention and performance.  
Overall, the findings highlight the need for supplementary instructional materials, visual resources, and safe  
alternatives to laboratory experiments to improve the teaching and learning of heat transfer. Despite constraints,  
teachers effectively integrate multiple strategies to make learning more engaging, meaningful, and accessible for  
students.  
Part 2. Use of Supplementary Printed Materials in Teaching  
Table 2. Summary of In-Service Science Teachers’ Responses on the Needs Assessment Survey Regarding the  
Use of Supplementary Printed Materials in Teaching  
Theme  
Coded for  
Quote  
Developed  
Use of worksheets “I use supplementary printed materials when teaching heat transfer, primarily  
of  
Printed and visual aids to consisting of worksheets that feature diagrams illustrating conduction,  
Visual Aids  
convection, and radiation, along with concise explanations and practice  
Page 8270  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
and  
reinforce  
learning problems. These materials provide students with a tangible reference that  
Worksheets and comprehension  
reinforces learning.” (NA-ST1)  
“I use printed materials including worksheets and other visual aids. These are  
quite effective because they encourage student participation and enhance  
understanding of the topic.” (NA-ST2)  
“In addition to giving students their own copies, printed materials visually  
show the process of how heat transfers between different materials, making  
learning clearer and more interactive.” (NA-ST3)  
Effectivene  
ss of independent  
Supplement collaborative  
ary Printed learning through  
structured exercises  
and visual diagrams  
Independen  
t and Group  
Learning  
Supporting  
“I use activity sheets and visual diagrams that explain heat transfer in simple  
and terms. They are effective because students can work independently or  
collaboratively, reinforcing learning even without digital tools.” (NA-ST4)  
“Printed worksheets, visual aids, and activity sheets support learning by  
providing diagrams, exercises, and short passages. They help visual learners  
and serve as references for review or missed lessons, making lessons  
organized and accessible.” (NA-ST5)  
Materials  
for  
Enhanceme  
Using  
printed “A printed learning packet can improve student engagement, comprehension,  
nt  
Comprehen  
sion and comprehension,  
of learning packets to and self-assessment. It provides structured content, practice problems, self-  
improve  
check quizzes, and diagrams that reinforce understanding and retention.”  
(NA-ST1)  
Independen  
t Learning  
self-paced learning,  
and engagement  
“It improves comprehension by allowing students to analyze material  
independently while supporting the main concept.” (NA-ST3)  
“The packet helps students learn at their own pace, with clear explanations,  
diagrams, and exercises, serving as a handy reference for study or review.”  
(NA-ST5)  
Accessibilit  
Providing  
“Printed materials help students follow lessons in an organized way. They are  
y
and organized  
and accessible and convenient, ensuring all students can participate in the  
Organizatio  
accessible  
learning process.” (NA-ST2)  
n
in resources to support  
inclusive learning  
“These resources allow students to learn at their own pace even without  
gadgets or internet access. They reinforce key concepts and make learning  
engaging and accessible.” (NA-ST4)  
Learning  
The table presents the summary results of the assessment in using supplementary printed materials in teaching  
answered by five science teachers, highlighting the challenges, teaching strategies, and instructional needs in  
teaching heat transfer in Grade 7 Science. Four themes were identified. The first theme shows that teachers  
frequently use printed visual aids and worksheets to strengthen understanding of conduction, convection, and  
radiation. Worksheets with diagrams, explanations, and practice problems provide students with concrete  
references that support both comprehension and retention. This aligns with Santos and Martin (2019), who found  
that printed visual aids enhance understanding of abstract science concepts. Velasco and Reyes (2020) similarly  
reported that structured worksheets with diagrams improve engagement and promote independent learning. Cruz  
et al. (2021) noted that printed materials help bridge theory and practice, making complex ideas more accessible.  
In addition, Lim and Gomez (2022) emphasized that visual aids support retention and accommodate diverse  
learning preferences.  
The second theme indicates that supplementary printed materials effectively support both independent and  
collaborative learning. Activity sheets and visual diagrams allow students to follow step-by-step explanations,  
Page 8271  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
work independently, or collaborate in groups even without digital tools. These findings are consistent with Santos  
and Martin (2019), who noted that worksheets provide structure for both individual and group learning. Velasco  
and Reyes (2020) found that activity sheets strengthen comprehension and teamwork. Cruz et al. (2021)  
emphasized that printed materials promote continuous learning beyond classroom instruction. Likewise, Lim  
and Gomez (2022) highlighted that printed diagrams and worksheets benefit visual learners and support  
inclusive, student-centered learning.  
The third theme highlights that printed learning packets enhance comprehension and independent learning.  
Learning packets provide structured content, practice problems, diagrams, and self-check quizzes that help  
students learn at their own pace, review lessons, and assess their understanding. These findings reflect Reyes  
and Santos (2019), who stated that printed learning materials strengthen comprehension through structured  
activities and visual support. Lim and Cruz (2020) found that self-paced packets increase engagement and  
personalize learning. Velasco et al. (2021) reported that printed packets improve retention by combining visual  
and guided elements. Gomez and Tan (2022) further emphasized that structured packets promote self-directed  
learning and help students apply scientific ideas in real-life contexts.  
The fourth theme demonstrates that printed materials enhance accessibility and organization in learning,  
allowing students to participate regardless of access to technology. Printed resources provide clear, organized,  
and step-by-step guidance that students can use independently, supporting inclusive learning environments. This  
is supported by Santos and Villanueva (2019), who highlighted that well-structured printed materials help  
students follow lessons at their own pace. Lim and Gonzales (2020) found that printed resources improve  
accessibility in low-tech classrooms. Cruz et al. (2021) noted that organized packets increase engagement and  
understanding through visual and structured activities. Additionally, Medina and Tan (2022) emphasized that  
printed materials serve as effective alternatives when digital tools are limited, ensuring equitable learning  
opportunities.  
Overall, the findings show that supplementary printed materials such as worksheets, visual aids, and learning  
packets play a vital role in enhancing student comprehension, supporting independent and collaborative learning,  
and ensuring accessibility in teaching heat transfer. These materials help simplify abstract concepts, reinforce  
lessons, and provide structured guidance that supports diverse learners, particularly in contexts with limited  
technological or laboratory resources.  
Development of the Printed Learning Packet on Heat Transfer  
Revision 1  
Table 1. Face Validation of the Developed Learning Packet on Heat Transfer  
Image 1,  
Before Revision  
Comment/s  
suggestion  
and  
Create a unique title for the packet.  
Remove the colored elements from the illustration, as they can be distracting.  
Simplifying the color scheme will help students focus on the main content rather  
than the decorative artwork.  
Page 8272  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
After revision  
No table of content provived  
Image 2,  
Before Revision  
Comment/s  
suggestion  
and Add a table of contents to the packet  
After revision  
Image 3,  
Before No overview provided  
Revision  
Comment/s  
suggestion  
and It could be enhance with a short overview or visual diagram before presenting the  
heat-transfer content.  
After revision  
As shown in Table 4.2.1, the panel recommended revising the packet title to make it more distinct and simplifying  
the colored elements in the illustrations, since excessive colors may distract students from the key concepts.  
These adjustments enhance visual clarity and ensure that students focus on the main scientific ideas. This aligns  
with Hernandez and Santos (2019), who emphasized that visually focused and simplified learning materials help  
students better grasp abstract scientific concepts. The evaluator also suggested adding a table of contents and  
including a brief overview or visual diagram before the lesson. These features help organize information and  
allow students to connect new content with prior knowledge. This recommendation is consistent with Bybee  
(2013), who highlighted that well-organized instructional materials improve lesson flow, and with Ausubel  
Page 8273  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
(1968) and Kim and Lee (2021), who found that advance organizers significantly improve comprehension of  
complex science topics.  
Revision 2.  
Table 2. Revision of the Developed Learning Packet on Heat Transfer  
Image 1, Before  
Revision  
Comment/s and Use “Lesson” instead of “Chapter” in the table of contents, because “Chapter” sounds too  
suggestion  
broad. Using “Lesson” makes the content feel more focused and appropriate for a learning  
packet.  
After revision  
Image 2, Before  
Revision  
Comment/s and Revise the learning objectives to ensure clear alignment with the lesson content. Remove the  
suggestion  
third objective since its ideas are already covered in Objectives 1 and 2.  
After revision  
Page 8274  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Image 3, Before  
Revision  
Comment/s and Place the activities right after each topic to ensure a clear and logical flow from concept to  
suggestion  
application  
After revision  
As shown in Table 4.2.2, teachers suggested replacing the term “Chapter” with “Lesson” to make the structure  
clearer and more appropriate for a learning packet. They also recommended revising the learning objectives to  
ensure alignment with the content and removing redundant objectives for clarity and precision. These  
improvements reflect Bybee’s (2013) assertion that clearly defined and organized lesson components support  
student understanding and engagement. Furthermore, teachers recommended placing activities immediately after  
each topic to reinforce learning and allow students to practice concepts right away. This supports Kolb’s (1984)  
experiential learning approach, which emphasizes that understanding deepens when learners apply concepts  
shortly after they are introduced. Hernandez and Santos (2019) similarly noted that structured and aligned  
activities enhance retention of abstract scientific concepts, making the packet more effective and student-  
centered.  
Revision 3.  
Table 3. Final Revision of the Developed Learning Packet on Heat Transfer  
Image  
1,  
Before Revision  
Comment/s and The directions should be placed before each question to guide students clearly on how to  
suggestion  
respond. Ensure the instructions specify the format expected (e.g., multiple choice, short  
answer, matching) and are concise but complete. This will help students focus and reduce  
confusion during assessment.  
Page 8275  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
After revision  
As presented in Table 4.2.3, teachers recommend placing clear directions before each question to guide students  
on how to respond and minimize confusion during assessment. Providing explicit instructions enhances  
comprehension and helps students focus on demonstrating understanding. This is aligned with Hernandez and  
Santos (2019), who noted that clear guidance in instructional materials reduces cognitive load and supports better  
performance in science tasks. The addition of a table of contents was also recommended to improve organization  
and navigation of the learning packet. A clear structure allows students to follow the lesson sequence more  
independently, consistent with Bybee (2013), who emphasized that well-organized materials improve  
instructional flow and learner engagement. These final revisions ensure that the packet is accessible, user-  
friendly, and aligned with best practices in science pedagogy  
Evaluation of the Printed Learning Packet on Heat Transfer  
Table 4. Summary of Rubric Evaluation Results for the Printed Learning Packet  
Criteria  
Indicator  
Weighted Mean SD  
Verbal Interpretation  
Content Focus  
Integration of heat transfer concepts 2.80  
throughout the packet  
0.45  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Clear and contextualized key concepts 3.00  
(conduction, convection, radiation)  
0.00  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Alignment with Grade 7 Science standards 3.00  
0.00  
0.45  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Learning  
Objective  
SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, 2.80  
Attainable, Relevant, Time-bound)  
Objectives expressed in behavioral terms  
2.60  
0.55  
0.45  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Objectives  
promoting  
conceptual 2.80  
understanding & inquiry  
Science  
Content  
Accuracy and alignment with science 2.80  
standards  
0.45  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Logical and age-appropriate presentation  
2.80  
0.45  
0.45  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Builds conceptual understanding of heat 2.80  
transfer  
Encourages independent exploration & 3.00  
application  
0.00  
0.00  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Real-Life  
Connection  
Connection of concepts to  
contexts  
real-life 3.00  
Page 8276  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Assessment  
Integration  
summative assessments  
of  
diagnostic,  
formative, 2.60  
0.55  
0.00  
0.45  
0.00  
0.55  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Very Highly Acceptable  
Supports  
thinking  
understanding  
and  
critical 3.00  
Instructional  
Design  
Clarity of format, layout, and flow 2.80  
Clear  
directions,  
visuals,  
structured 3.00  
activities  
Closure  
Activities  
Reflection or synthesis at lesson end  
2.60  
Linking content to real-world situations  
3.00  
0.00  
Overall  
2.85  
0.28  
Very  
Highly  
Acceptable  
The evaluation results presented in Table 4 show that the Printed Learning Packet on Heat Transfer is highly  
acceptable across all major criteria, with weighted means ranging from 2.60 to 3.00. Strengths emerged in  
content clarity, alignment with Grade 7 standards, well-designed visuals, and real-life contextualization—each  
receiving perfect ratings of WM = 3.00. The packet effectively integrates key concepts such as conduction,  
convection, and radiation, while also promoting independent application, critical thinking, and meaningful  
connections to everyday experiences. These findings align with studies highlighting that clear explanations and  
contextualized science content significantly improve students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature  
(Adadan & Yavuzkaya, 2018; Stylos et al., 2021). Similarly, research emphasizes that structured visual aids and  
real-life examples help learners overcome difficulties with abstract scientific concepts, supporting the strong  
evaluator response to the packet’s instructional design (Lopez & Villanueva, 2020; Rivera & Torres, 2023).  
However, slightly lower ratings of 2.60 to 2.80 in behavioral objectives, varied assessment types, and reflection  
or synthesis activities suggest areas for refinement. These findings indicate the need to strengthen the packet’s  
alignment with performance-based learning and assessment diversity. Educational literature supports these  
conclusions: studies show that clearly written behavioral objectives enhance learning direction and outcomes  
(Depaepe et al., 2015), and that integrating diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments promotes deeper  
conceptual understanding and metacognition (Danili & Reid, 2004). Additionally, research confirms that  
reflection-based activities are essential for reinforcing conceptual change, especially in heat and thermodynamics  
topics (Lee, 2014; Valkanou et al., 2024).  
Overall, the evaluation and supporting literature affirm that the Printed Learning Packet is an instructionally  
sound, curriculum-aligned, and effective learning tool for Grade 7 science, yielding an Overall Mean of 2.85  
(SD = 0.28). With targeted improvements in learning objectives, assessment variety, and reflective components,  
the packet has strong potential to advance from “highly acceptable” to an exemplary instructional material  
grounded in evidence-based science teaching practices.  
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS  
This study developed and validated a printed learning packet on heat transfer to address the challenges identified  
by teachers such as lack of resources, safety limitations, and students’ misconceptions highlight the importance  
of providing structured, accessible, and activity-based materials that can enhance classroom instruction even in  
resource-constrained environments. The learning packet, designed using the 4D Model, received a grand  
weighted mean of 2.85 (Very Highly Acceptable), confirming its clarity, accuracy, and strong alignment with  
curriculum standards. Teachers agreed that the material effectively simplifies conduction, convection, and  
Page 8277  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
radiation, supports independent learning, and enhances engagement through structured activities and real-life  
examples.  
In light of these findings, it is recommended that the learning packet be used as supplementary material in  
teaching heat transfer, especially in resource-limited classrooms. Future enhancements may focus on improving  
behavioral objectives, diversifying assessment tasks, and incorporating more reflection activities. Teacher  
orientation on the effective use of activity-based printed materials is also encouraged. Further research using  
classroom implementation and pre-test–post-test designs is recommended to determine the packet’s impact on  
student learning and misconception reduction.  
REFERENCE  
1. Adadan, E., & Yavuzkaya, N. (2018). Examining students’ understanding of heat, temperature, and heat  
transfer through multiple representations. Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 455–472.  
2. Awudi, I. T., & Danso, S. (2023). Effectiveness of demonstration-based instructional materials in  
improving students’ understanding of heat transfer concepts. International Journal of Science and  
Education Research, 7(2), 112–126.  
3. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science:  
Research into children’s ideas. Routledge.  
4. Isa, M. A., Bongcales, M., & Lomerio, R. (2020). Teaching challenges in Philippine science classrooms:  
A basis for improving instructional delivery. Philippine Journal of Education and Human Development,  
8(1), 34–45.  
5. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice  
Hall.  
6. Korir, D. K., & Kipkemboi, F. (2014). The impact of school environment and peer influences on students’  
academic performance in Vihiga County, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,  
4(5), 240–251  
7. Malicoban, R. A., Reyes, L. B., & Salcedo, J. P. (2021). Development and validation of a supplementary  
learning module in science for Grade 7 students. Philippine Journal of Science Teaching, 17(2), 33–42.  
8. Mayer, R. E. (1974). Cognitive theory of meaningful verbal learning. Review of Educational Research,  
9. Pathare, S. R., & Pradhan, H. C. (2010). Students’ misconceptions about heat transfer mechanisms.  
Physics Education, 27(2), 155–164.  
10. Sozbilir, M. (2003). A review of selected literature on students’ misconceptions of heat and temperature.  
Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 20(1), 25–40.  
11. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers  
of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana University.  
Page 8278