INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Learning Recovery Through Distributed Leadership: A Review on  
the Implementation of Deped’s Aral Program  
Hananena B. De Los Santos, MALE; Froremie T. Montecillo, MALE, Gladys S. Escarlos, PhD  
Department of Education, Central Mindanao University, Philippines  
Received: 17 November 2025; Accepted: 24 November 2025; Published: 29 November 2025  
The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in education, resulting in severe learning losses among  
Filipino learners, especially in foundational literacy and numeracy skills. In response, the Department of  
Education (DepEd) launched the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program to bridge  
learning gaps and accelerate academic recovery nationwide. However, the success of such a large-scale initiative  
depends on effective leadership and collaboration at all school levels. This review examines the implementation  
of the ARAL Program through the lens of Distributed Leadership Theory, which emphasizes shared  
responsibility, collective agency, and contextual adaptability among multiple actorsschool heads, teacher-  
leaders, tutors, parents, and local government units (LGUs). Drawing on recent literature and policy reports, the  
paper argues that distributed leadership fosters stronger ownership, adaptability, and sustainability in learning  
recovery efforts. When leadership is shared and collaborative, ARAL becomes not only a remedial intervention  
but a community-driven movement that empowers schools to respond effectively to learners’ diverse needs.  
Keywords: distributed leadership, ARAL program, learning recovery, educational governance, DepEd  
Philippines, collaborative leadership, post-pandemic education  
INTRODUCTION  
The disruption of face-to-face schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic left deep learning gaps around the  
world, particularly in foundational skills in literacy and numeracy (World Bank et al., 2022). In the Philippine  
context, the Department of Education’s ARAL Program was established by law under RA 12028, signed in 2024,  
to accelerate learning recovery and support learners who were falling behind (Department of Education, 2024).  
According to Republic Act No. 12028 (2024), among the ARAL Program’s key goals are strengthening  
foundational competencies in reading, mathematics, and science; mobilizing well-chosen and trained tutors; and  
engaging communities through campaigns to encourage learners to return to school.  
However, implementing large-scale recovery initiatives such as ARAL raises complex governance and  
leadership challenges: identifying who leads, how responsibilities are distributed, how stakeholders collaborate,  
and how local contexts are engaged (Republic Act No. 12028, 2024). Traditional leadership models often rely  
on a single head or centralized hierarchy, but this can limit the school’s ability to respond and adapt. Scholars  
have argued that in complex, changing contexts (e.g., during a crisis), distributed leadership enables greater  
responsiveness, collective ownership, and adaptive capacity (Cheng, 2024).  
In response, this review proposes to examine the implementation of the ARAL Program through the theoretical  
lens of Distributed Leadership Theorynamely, how leadership tasks and responsibilities are shared among  
multiple actors (school heads, teachers, tutors, communities, parents) to better support learning recovery. By  
doing so, we aim to highlight how distributed leadership practices can enhance the ARAL implementation, what  
conditions enable it, and what barriers remain.  
Conceptual Foundation Of Distributed Leadership  
Distributed Leadership Theory stems from the idea that leadership in schools is not solely centered on one  
individual but is best conceptualized as “a series of practices carried out by multiple actors” in dynamic  
interaction with context (Gómez-Hurtado et al., 2020). For example, in the middle‐school classroom context,  
Page 929  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
distributed leadership has been shown to improve teaching effectiveness and school operation efficiency (Ling,  
Bai, Li, &ꢀYang, 2023).  
Key features of the distributed leadership framework include:  
a. Shared responsibility: Leadership tasks are distributed across formal leaders (school heads, department  
chairs) and informal leaders (teacher-leaders, tutors, parents) (Antin & Dzulkifli, 2025).  
b. Collective agency: Multiple actors engage in decision-making, problem-solving, and change processes,  
rather than simply executing top-down instructions (Costache, 2025).  
c. Interactional architecture: Systems, routines, and structures support collaborative leadership practices  
and enable multiple actors to lead (Eriksson, Andersson Bäck, Elmersjö, et al., 2025).  
d. Contextual adaptation: Leadership practices vary by school context, and the distribution of leadership  
tasks must reflect local needs and conditions (Eriksson, Andersson Bäck, Elmersjö, et al., 2025).  
In empirical studies, distributed leadership has been associated with higher teacher empowerment, increased  
teacher autonomy, and stronger organizational commitment (Pineda et al., 2025).  
Meanwhile, in the Philippines, studies show growing awareness of distributed leadership practices among public  
elementary teachers.  
Applying this conceptual foundation to the ARAL Program implies that recovery efforts are more likely to  
succeed if leadership is distributed: tutors, teacher-leaders, school heads, parents, LGUs and community  
volunteers collaborate, decision‐making is shared, and multiple stakeholders contribute to implementation,  
monitoring and adaptation of the recovery interventions.  
Given the theoretical foundations discussed above, it becomes essential to examine how these principles of  
shared leadership manifest within actual educational programs. The ARAL Program provides a relevant context  
for exploring the operationalization of distributed leadership, as its implementation involves various  
stakeholdersschool heads, teachers, tutors, parents, LGUs, and community partners. The following section  
therefore connects the conceptual framework to concrete ARAL practices, highlighting both strengths and  
challenges.  
Distributed Leadership And The Implementation Of The Aral Program  
The ARAL Program requires broad mobilization of stakeholders to support learning recovery. Using distributed  
leadership as a lens, the implementation can be examined across several dimensions:  
a. Shared responsibility and tutor mobilizations  
In practice, ARAL relies heavily on tutors, teacher-leaders, school principals, and community volunteers who  
work together to implement tutorials and support struggling learners (Department of Education, 2024). This  
represents a clear distribution of leadership roles, as tutors and teacher-leaders are encouraged to participate in  
decision-making, provide feedback, and help refine the school’s ARAL action plan.  
Despite this intent, shared responsibility is sometimes limited by uneven tutor availability, inconsistent  
recruitment processes, and lack of clarity in role expectations. In many schools, the workload still tends to fall  
on a few teachers, reflecting lingering hierarchical patterns (Manila Bulletin, 2025).  
b. Collaborative planning, monitoring and decision-making  
To localize ARAL interventions, schools are encouraged to involve principal, teacher-leaders, tutors, and parents  
in reviewing diagnostic data and planning targeted sessions. This operationalizes distributed leadership by  
Page 930  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
enabling multiple actors to jointly identify learners’ needs and co-design intervention strategies (Department of  
Education, 2024).  
Collaboration is often hindered by logistical constraints such as lack of common meeting time, insufficient  
training on data interpretation, or weak communication channels between home, school, and LGUs. In some  
contexts, planning remains largely principal-driven rather than shared (de Jong, Meirink, & Admiraal, 2022).  
c. Contextual adaptation and local agency  
ARAL explicitly encourages LGUs, barangays, and parents’ associations to support contextual adaptation. When  
leadership is distributed, these groups can help secure tutorial spaces, provide resources, or tailor session  
schedules according to community realitiesparticularly important in remote, rural, or crowded urban schools  
(Republic Act No. 12028, 2024).  
Local government engagement varies widely. Some LGUs provide strong support, while others lack resources  
or prioritization. This uneven participation limits ARAL’s ability to adapt interventions equitably across schools.  
d. Capacity building and teacher-leader development  
Distributed leadership in ARAL is operationalized when tutors and teacher-leaders receive ongoing training and  
mentoring, equipping them to assume leadership roles in implementing tutorials, monitoring learner progress,  
and guiding instructional adjustments (Guzman, 2025).  
Tutor capacity is inconsistent due to varying levels of training, differing teaching backgrounds, and limited  
mentoring opportunities. Without adequate support, tutors may struggle to carry out leadership roles confidently  
or effectively.  
e. Monitoring, feedback and adaptive leadership loops  
ARAL requires regular monitoring of learner progress, tutor performance, and implementation challenges. When  
teacher-leaders and tutors help analyze data and recommend modifications, they enact adaptive, distributed  
leadership.  
Feedback loops are often weakened by lack of monitoring tools, insufficient time for reflective sessions, or  
unclear mechanisms for reporting challenges to school leaders. As a result, program adjustments may be slow  
or incomplete.  
The implementation patterns and challenges discussed above reveal that while ARAL incorporates many  
elements of distributed leadership, its success depends heavily on strengthening collaborative structures, local  
capacities, and shared decision-making. These insights inform the policy and practice implications discussed in  
the next section. (Department of Education, 2025).  
Implications  
Adopting a distributed leadership framework in the ARAL Program implementation carries necessary  
implications for the formulation of the policy, leadership practice and overall system design based on the  
guidelines posted by the Department of Education, Implementing Guidelines for the ARAL Program in Reading  
(DM 064, s.ꢀ2025):  
Decentralized decision-making and foster local agency.  
Schools and local should be given the authority to convene and adjust ARAL activities based on the needs of the  
learners. The role of the leadership should be shared with the persons involved within the locality such as the  
teacher-leader, tutors, parents and LGU’s to build an ownership that is shared by everyone which makes the  
program more suited in the local context.  
Page 931  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Develop teacher-leaders and tutors as co-leaders.  
Providing ongoing professional development, mentoring, peer learning communities, and reflective practices.  
This means that it should invest in capacity building to transform tutors and teacher-leaders into active leadership  
roles.  
Facilitate collaborative planning and participatory governance.  
Planning teams and learning recovery task force should be establish in formal structures. This would lead to the  
collaborative decision making of the teacher-leader, tutors, parents, local government representatives and  
stakeholders in the community.  
Design adaptive monitoring and feedback systems.  
Local review teams should be establish composed of tutors, teacher-leaders to monitor learners progress, identify  
barriers, evaluate strategies and adjust the implementation as needed. This ensures that the feedback flows  
smoothly across levels.  
Leverage community and stakeholder partnerships.  
Distributed leadership extends beyond the school. There should be an integration of partnerships with barangays,  
parents, local organizations, and private stakeholders into ARAL implementation so that the recovery of learning  
becomes a shared community endeavor.  
Align policy frameworks to support distributed leadership.  
Acknowledgement of the distributed leadership models by the national and regional offices should be done,  
recognizing that the leadership extends beyond the school who shared the responsibilities. Additionally,  
accountability systems and trainings should be embodied by the model in promoting a collaborative leadership,  
establishing collective performance indicators, and rewarding the shared responsibility rather than focusing  
solely on the performance of the individual.  
Strategic recommendations:  
Create a school-based ARAL leadership teams rather than sole coordinators.  
Define and illustrate clear roles and responsibilities for tutor-leaders, teacher-leaders, and community  
partners.  
Establish peer-led professional learning communities focused on ARAL strategies.  
Align local school plans with ARAL implementation plans, enabling adaptation based on local  
diagnostics.  
Acknowledge and reward collaborative leadership efforts (e.g., tutor-leader contributions, community  
mobilization).  
Review and revise monitoring frameworks to include local leadership and participatory decision-making  
indicators.  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
Research about the distributed leadership demonstrates a positive relationship with teacher empowerment,  
development of the organization and the overall effectiveness of school. For example, the review of the theory  
in 2023 in the post-primary schools identified that there is empirical evidence that highlights the contribution of  
the collaborative practices, school culture cultivation and teacher agency enhancement.  
Page 932  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Also, in Philippines-based research, awareness and practices of distributed leadership among elementary  
teachers are increasing, though challenges remain around culture, capacity and decision-making structures  
(Kadir, Kamarudin & Tao, 2025).  
Applying these insights to ARAL, one may suggest that the distributing leadership responsibilities to the person  
involved such as the tutors, teacher-leaders, school principals and community stakeholders enhances its capacity  
and effectiveness. Moreover, it sustains interventions and broader range of participants. In contrast, highly  
centralized implementation with limited local leadership involvement may constrain opportunities for  
ownership, contextual adaptation, and long-term sustainability (Calderon, 2023).  
Some potential barriers to distributed leadership in ARAL include:  
Limited training or capacity of tutor-leaders and teacher-leaders to assume leadership tasks.  
Cultural or institutional norms hat continue to favor hierarchical, top-down leadership models.  
Inadequate structures for collaboration, planning and decision-making at the local school level.  
Insufficient resources or overworked staff reducing time for collaborative leadership practices.  
Ambiguity in roles, responsibilities and accountability among distributed leadership actors.  
Considering the scale and urgency of ARAL’s aims, adopting a distributed leadership perspective offers  
a compelling framework for improving the program’s effectiveness by reframing leadership not as a  
single person’s job but as a multi‐actor, collaborative Endeavor.  
To overcome these challenges, ARAL Program should build leadership capacity by establishing a regular and  
professional cycle for tutors and teacher leaders. Calderon (2023) also mentioned that school principals should  
provide opportunities to teacher-leaders to develop and grow in their respective fields. This includes mentoring,  
training and time for collaborative learning. Also, a more distributed and sustainable leadership that does not  
solely rely on one individual. In practice, this means integrating leadership-skills workshops, peer mentoring  
sessions and scheduled collaborative planning meetings into ARAL sessions. The agenda includes ARAL roles,  
leadership tasks, planning syllabus to build trust among tutors, teacher-leaders and school administrators.  
REFERENCES  
1. Antin, A., & Dzulkifli, D. (2025). An empirical study on the levels of principals’ distributed leadership,  
virtual professional learning communities, teacher motivation, and teacher leadership in secondary  
schools in Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Research & Innovation in Social Science, 9(5).  
2. Cheng, Y.-C. (2024). A typology of multiple school leadership. EducationꢀSciences, 14(1), Articleꢀ70.  
3. Costache, B. (2025). Distributed Leadership and Instructional Effectiveness: A Multi-Level Analysis of  
Leadership Capacity Building in Under-Resourced Schools. International Journal of Research &  
Innovation in Social Science, 9(5), 59115924. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.908000481  
4. Department of Education. (2024, October 18). President Marcos signs ARAL Law to accelerate learning  
5. Department of Education. (2024). Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 12028 (ARAL Program  
6. Department of Education (2025). Implementing Guidelines for the ARAL Program in Reading (DM 064,  
s.ꢀ2025).  
Page 933  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
7. de Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for  
teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101927.  
8. Eriksson, A., Andersson Bäck, M., Elmersjö, M., et al. (2025). Forms of distributed leadership A case  
study of six workplaces in eldercare. BMC Health Services Research, 25, 300.  
9. Galdames-Calderón, M. (2023). Distributed Leadership: School Principals’ Practices to Promote  
Teachers’ Professional Development for School Improvement. Education Sciences, 13(7), 715.  
10. Gómez-Hurtado, I., González-Falcón, I., Coronel-Llamas, J. M., & García-Rodríguez, M. d. P. (2020).  
Distributing Leadership or Distributing Tasks? The Practice of Distributed Leadership by Management  
and Its Limitations in Two Spanish Secondary Schools. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050122  
11. Guzman, J. (2025, September 16). DepEd launches ARAL program to strengthen students’ foundational  
strengthen-students-foundational-skills/  
12. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational  
Administration,  
46(2),  
172-188.  
13. Kadir, S., Kamarudin, N., & Tao,ꢀY. (2025). The Relationship between Distributed Leadership and  
School Effectiveness: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social  
distributed-leadership-and-school-effectiveness-a-systematic-review/.  
14. Manila Bulletin. (2025, October 16). Maka-bata pero hindi maka-guro: DepEd urged to address gaps in  
pero-hindi-maka-guro-deped-urged-to-address-gaps-in-aral-program-implementation  
15. World Bank, UNICEF, FCDO, USAID, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, & UNESCO. (2022). The  
State of Global Learning Poverty: 2022 Update. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-global-  
16. Xi Ling, YuꢀJie Bai, BinꢀBin Li & ZhiꢀYang. (2023). The application of distributed leadership in middle  
school classroom. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1200792  
17. Yulo, J. P., & Dioso, D. P. (2025). Awareness and Practices of Distributed Leadership among Public  
Elementary  
School  
Teachers.  
Philippine  
Social  
Science  
Journal,  
3(2).  
18. Zita, C.ꢀT., & Pastor, J.ꢀA. (2020). Empowering Academic Stakeholders through Distributive  
Leadership.ꢀInstabright International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2),ꢀ105–109.  
Page 934