
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9947
www.rsisinternational.org
 










The importance of character development in educators has garnered increasing attention within the field of
education as it is closely linked to the ethical and effective delivery of teaching. Character traits such as honesty,
courage and respect not only shape the personal and professional traits of teachers but also significantly influence
the learning environments they create for their students. This study aimed to explore expert consensus on teacher
character development by integrating the philosophical concepts of virtue and eudaimonia, which are essential
for fostering ethical and effective teaching practices. This study aimed to explore expert consensus on teacher
character development by integrating the philosophical concepts of virtue and eudaimonia which are essential
for fostering ethical and effective teaching practices. The study employed the Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
to elicit and synthesise the perspectives of educational experts regarding the key elements that constitute teacher
character development. The participants comprised nine panels of educational experts with diverse backgrounds
in teaching, teacher education and educational psychology, thereby ensuring a comprehensive range of
perspectives. The findings revealed a strong consensus among experts on the importance of cultivating specific
virtuous character traits in teachers including honesty, courage, wisdom, generosity, justice, respect and humility.
Furthermore, the study highlighted the critical role of eudaimonia in teacher character development
encompassing aspects such as finding deeper meaning in one’s work, continuous personal and professional
growth and maintaining a healthy work–life balance. Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of
research on character based approaches to teaching and offers valuable insights for the development of more
holistic and sustainable strategies to support teacher well-being and teaching effectiveness.
 Character Development; Teacher Character Development; Eudaimonia; Virtue; Nominal Group
Technique (NGT)

In recent years, the development of character among educators has received increasing scholarly attention within
the field of education, particularly in relation to the ethical and effective delivery of teaching. This growing
interest reflects broader concerns about the moral dimensions of teaching, professional integrity and the
responsibility of educators in shaping not only students’ academic outcomes but also their values, attitudes and
behaviours. As teaching is inherently a moral practice, the character of teachers plays a central role in influencing
classroom interactions, decision-making processes and the overall moral climate of educational environments
(Sockett, 2012; Campbell, 2008). Character development in educators encompasses a range of moral and
professional traits that guide behaviour and judgment in complex educational contexts. Traits such as honesty,
courage, respect and justice are widely recognised as foundational to ethical teaching practice as they enable
teachers to act with integrity, fairness and sensitivity towards students and colleagues (Arthur et al., 2017). These
character traits do not merely reflect personal moral qualities but are closely intertwined with professional
identity, shaping how teachers respond to ethical dilemmas, manage relationships and fulfil their educational
responsibilities. Research suggests that teachers who consistently demonstrate positive character traits are more
likely to establish supportive, respectful and trust-based learning environments that promote student engagement
and moral development (Nucci, 2017).

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9948
www.rsisinternational.org
The significance of teacher character is particularly evident within the context of character education and moral
education. Scholars have long argued that students learn moral values not only through formal curricula but also
through the implicit messages conveyed by teachers’ conduct, attitudes and interaction which a process often
described as the “hidden curriculum” (Jackson et al., 1993; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2006). Teachers serve as daily
role models whose actions may reinforce or undermine the moral values promoted within educational
programmes. Consequently, the cultivation of teacher character is increasingly viewed as a critical component
of effective character-based education. Despite this recognition, contemporary teacher education and
professional development programmes have often prioritised technical competencies, pedagogical skills and
measurable performance outcomes, sometimes at the expense of moral and character development (Biesta,
2015). While such competencies are undeniably important, an overemphasis on technical effectiveness risks
reducing teaching to a purely instrumental activity, neglecting its ethical and relational dimensions. This has led
to growing calls for more holistic approaches to teacher development that integrate professional skills with moral
character formation and personal well-being (Day & Gu, 2014).
Within this discourse, the philosophical concepts of virtue and eudaimonia have emerged as important theoretical
foundations for understanding teacher character development. Virtue refers to stable moral dispositions that
enable individuals to act ethically and appropriately across various situations, while eudaimonia is commonly
understood as human flourishing or living well (Kristjánsson, 2015). In educational contexts, these concepts
highlight the idea that ethical teaching is not merely about following rules or fulfilling external standards but
involves the ongoing cultivation of character traits that support meaningful and morally grounded professional
practice. Integrating eudaimonia into discussions of teacher character development also draws attention to the
relationship between ethical practice and teacher well-being. Teaching is widely recognised as a demanding
profession characterised by emotional labour, increasing workload pressures, and complex interpersonal
challenges (Hargreaves, 2000). In this context, teacher well-being has become a growing area of concern,
particularly in relation to burnout, stress and attrition. From a character-based perspective, teacher well-being is
not solely a matter of individual resilience but is closely connected to finding meaning in one’s work, engaging
in continuous personal and professional growth and maintaining a healthy balance between professional and
personal life (Day & Gu, 2014). These dimensions align closely with the concept of eudaimonia suggesting that
flourishing teachers are better positioned to teach ethically and effectively.

Although theoretical literature has extensively discussed the importance of virtues and flourishing in teaching,
there remains a need for empirical research that clarifies how these concepts are understood and prioritised by
educational experts. Existing studies often focus on specific character traits or isolated aspects of teacher ethics,
resulting in fragmented understandings of teacher character development (Campbell, 2008; Sockett, 2012).
Moreover, limited attention has been given to achieving expert consensus on the key elements that should
constitute teacher character development particularly through systematic and structured methodologies.
In response to this gap, the present study seeks to explore expert consensus on teacher character development by
integrating the concepts of virtue and eudaimonia. By employing the Nominal Group Technique (NGT), the
study provides a structured platform for educational experts to articulate, discuss and prioritise the character
traits and flourishing-related elements considered essential for ethical and effective teaching. The use of NGT
enhances the rigor of the study by promoting equal participation, minimising dominance effects and enabling
the systematic synthesis of expert perspectives (Delbecq et al., 1975).

The literature review includes the concept of character development in the teaching profession, core virtue and
eudaimonia for teacher well-being.

Teaching is no longer understood merely as a technical or instructional activity; rather, it is widely recognised
as a moral and ethical practice in which teachers’ character plays a central role (Campbell, 2003; Sockett, 2012).
Teachers’ personal virtues shape their professional judgment, interpersonal relationships, and the moral climate

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9949
www.rsisinternational.org
of the classroom, thereby influencing both student learning and holistic development. Research in moral and
character education consistently highlights teachers as moral exemplars whose actions, attitudes, and decision-
making processes implicitly transmit values to students (Lapsley & Narvaez, 2006). Carr (2007) argues that
effective moral education cannot be detached from the moral character of teachers themselves, as students learn
ethical conduct not only through formal instruction but also through daily observation of teachers’ behaviour.
Consequently, character development is increasingly viewed as a foundational dimension of teacher
professionalism rather than an optional or peripheral attribute. In both local and international contexts,
heightened work demands, accountability pressures and ethical dilemmas have intensified concerns regarding
teachers’ integrity, resilience and well-being (Day & Gu, 2014; OECD, 2021). Within this context, philosophical
perspectives grounded in virtue and eudaimonia offer a coherent and robust framework for understanding teacher
character development.

Virtue ethics, deeply rooted in Aristotelian philosophy, plays a crucial role in the character development of
teachers, who are not only responsible for the academic instruction of their students but also for modeling ethical
behavior (Kristjánsson, 2015; Sockett, 2012). The virtues, such as courage, honesty and compassion, are
essential qualities that teachers must cultivate to create a morally and emotionally supportive learning
environment (Hursthouse, 1999; Annas, 2011). Teachers who embody these virtues are better equipped to handle
the diverse and often complex challenges of the classroom, thereby fostering a positive educational experience
for their students (Arthur, 2016). Moreover, the cultivation of virtue in teachers is seen as a foundational element
in promoting moral education as it directly influences their ability to guide students in developing their own
moral compass (Carr, 2011; Kristjánsson, 2013). This alignment between a teacher's personal virtues and
professional responsibilities ensures that their actions consistently reflect ethical principles which is crucial in
maintaining the integrity and trust essential in the educational process (Sanger & Osguthorpe, 2013).
Empirical studies further support the relevance of virtue in teacher development. Osguthorpe (2008) found that
teachers who demonstrate strong moral character are more likely to exhibit professional commitment, ethical
sensitivity and trustworthiness. More recent research suggests that virtue-based teacher education programs
enhance reflective capacity, moral reasoning and ethical awareness among pre-service and inservice teachers
(Wong, Kristjánsson, & Darnell, 2021). These findings indicate that virtue is not merely an abstract philosophical
ideal but a practical and observable dimension of professional teaching practice.
Kristjánsson (2020) argues that virtue ethics is particularly well suited to education because it integrates
cognition, emotion and action within a coherent account of moral agency. From this perspective, teacher
character development is understood as a lifelong process involving continuous self-reflection, moral growth
and identity formation. Such an approach aligns with contemporary views of teacher professionalism that
emphasise ethical judgment, relational responsibility and personal authenticity. Researchers also argue that the
character of teachers not only significantly impacts their teaching effectiveness but also give impact on the moral
development of their students (Berkowitz & Bier, 2005; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2006). This holistic approach to
character development underscores the importance of integrating virtue ethics into teacher education programs,
ensuring that teachers are not only knowledgeable but also virtuous individuals capable of making ethical
decisions in the best interests of their students (Arthur, 2016; Kristjánsson, 2020).

Eudaimonia, a central concept in Aristotelian ethics often translated as "flourishing" or "the good life," represents
the highest human good achieved through the cultivation of virtue and rational activity (Norton, 1976;
Kristjánsson, 2020). It emphasises personal growth, moral integrity and meaningful engagement, in contrast to
hedonic well-being which focuses on pleasure and satisfaction (Ryan & Deci, 2001; Waterman, 2013). In teacher
character development, eudaimonia highlights the importance of aligning professional practice with intrinsic
ethical values which contributing to personal fulfilment and effective guidance of students’ moral and intellectual
growth (Carr, 2011; Seligman, 2011). Teachers pursuing eudaimonia engage in reflective practice, continually
improving their moral and professional conduct, thereby fostering educational environments supportive of both
teacher and student development (Walker, 2005; Sherman, 1997; Kristjánsson, 2015).

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9950
www.rsisinternational.org
Research shows that teachers experiencing meaningful work are more resilient, motivated, and committed, even
in challenging environments (Day et al., 2011). Eudaimonic well-being is linked to reduced burnout and
emotional exhaustion, persistent concerns in teaching (Bakker & Oerlemans, 2011). Key dimensions include
continuous personal and professional growth, autonomy, reflective practice, and a healthy worklife balance
(Parker et al., 2012). Autonomy-supportive and values-oriented school climates further enhance eudaimonic
well-being, improving instructional quality and teacher retention (Slemp, Field, & Cho, 2020).
Teachers’ eudaimonia has broader implications for students and school communities. Flourishing teachers form
positive relationships, demonstrate empathy and patience, and create supportive learning environments grounded
in mutual respect (Hansen, 2001; Wong, Lau, & Lim, 2023). Eudaimonia thus functions as both a personal
outcome and a relational and institutional good within educational settings. Pursuing eudaimonia requires
teachers to embody and demonstrate the virtues they wish to instill in students, viewing teaching as a vocation
rather than merely a job (Sockett, 2012; Arthur, 2016; Kristjánsson, 2020; Carr, 2006). Cultivating practical
wisdom enables sound ethical decisions in complex classroom scenarios (Nussbaum, 2001; Hursthouse, 1999).
Fostering eudaimonic well-being positions teachers to create learning environments that are academically
rigorous and ethically rich supporting the holistic flourishing of the educational community (Seligman, 2011;
Kristjánsson, 2013).

This study employed the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to gather and synthesize expert opinions on the
integration of core virtue and Eudaimonia into teacher character development. NGT was chosen for its structured
approach, which facilitates idea generation, discussion and consensus among experts on complex issues
(Srivastava, Satsangi & Satsangee 2019; Delbecq, Van de Ven & Gustafson, 1975).

The study involved a purposive sample of nine educational experts, whom are experienced teachers with
specializations in various educational fields, including moral education, Islamic education, counseling and
guidance, and sciences and scholars in educational philosophy, were selected to participate in the NGT sessions.
Participants were chosen based on their profound expertise in teacher development and their familiarity with the
philosophical constructs central to the study. According to Booker and McNamara (2004), experts are
knowledgeable individuals who have achieved their level of proficiency through a combination of classroom
study, practical application and independent study. The inclusion criteria for participants emphasized their
extensive teaching experience and domain-specific expertise. As Cantrill, Sibbald, and Buetow (1996) define,
an expert is someone who has demonstrated exceptional knowledge within a particular field. The varied
specializations of the participants ensured a comprehensive examination of the philosophical constructs,
facilitating a richer and more nuanced interpretation of their application across different educational contexts.

The research was conducted through a face-to-face Nominal Group Technique (NGT) session, lasting 1.5 hours.
The session was designed to facilitate structured brainstorming, discussion and prioritization of ideas related to
the integration of Eudaimonia and Core Values in teaching practices. The NGT process was divided into several
key phases:

At the outset, each expert was asked to individually generate ideas and suggestions on how the identified
philosophical constructs could be integrated into teacher character development. This phase was conducted
silently to ensure that each participant’s ideas were uninfluenced by others, fostering independent and original
thought.

Following individual idea generation, participants took turns sharing their ideas with the group in a round-robin
mode. Each idea was recorded and displayed to the entire group to ensure transparency and clarity. During this
phase, no evaluation or discussion of ideas was permitted, allowing for the uninterrupted flow of contributions.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9951
www.rsisinternational.org

After all ideas were presented, the group engaged in an in-depth discussion of each idea. This phase allowed
participants to clarify their contributions, elaborate on the ideas presented by others, and explore the practical
implications of each suggestion. The discussion aimed to build a shared understanding of the ideas and their
potential impact on teacher character development.

In the final phase, participants were asked to rank the ideas based on their perceived importance and feasibility.
Each expert assigned a numerical value to each idea, reflecting its priority within the context of the study. These
rankings were then aggregated to produce a prioritized list of ideas and suggestions.

The data collected during the NGT sessions were analyzed using a combination of qualitative and quantitative
methods. Perry and Linsley (2006) define NGT as an evaluation method that combines quantitative and
qualitative approaches. The qualitative data from the discussions were coded and categorized into themes, while
the quantitative data from the ranking process were analyzed using NGTPLUS software by Ramlan (2021) and
also were used to identify the most highly prioritized components. The results were then synthesized to provide
a comprehensive understanding of the expert consensus on teacher character development.

The results of this study which used the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to obtain expert opinion and consensus
has emphasized crucial features of teacher character development via the framework of core virtue and
eudaimonia.

Table 1



 



Honesty
Practicing honesty in teaching fosters trust with students,
which is essential for creating an effective learning
environment.
27
**100
Courage
Exercising courage enables teachers to confront ethical
challenges in the classroom, ensuring that their actions
remain fair and just.
27
**100
Wisdom
Applying wisdom allows teachers to navigate complex
situations in schools by making morally sound decisions.
27
**100
Generosity
Demonstrating generosity through giving attention and time
to students boosts their engagement and supports their moral
development.
27
**100
Justice
Ensuring justice in the classroom provides all students with
equal opportunities to succeed, regardless of their
backgrounds.
27
**100
Respect
Practicing respect towards students and colleagues
contributes to building a positive and ethical educational
environment.
27
**100
Humility
Embracing humility helps teachers accept feedback and
fosters continuous learning, which is crucial for personal
and professional growth.
27
**100
Note: ** Percentage of agreement (>70%)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9952
www.rsisinternational.org
The experts reached a strong consensus on the critical role of cultivating specific virtuous character traits in
teachers (see Table 1). They identified honesty, courage, wisdom, generosity, justice, respect, and humility as
essential for fostering trust with students, ethical decision-making, moral development, and the creation of a
positive educational environment.
By fostering the development of these virtues, educators can become more effective role models and better
equipped to navigate the ethical challenges that arise in the classroom (Lumpkin, 2008; Schwartz & Sharpe,
2006). The experts emphasized that practicing honesty in teaching helps to build trust with students, which is
crucial for an effective learning environment (Berkowitz & Bier, 2004; Lumpkin, 2008). They also noted that
exercising courage enables teachers to confront ethical challenges in the classroom, ensuring that their actions
remain fair and just (Kristjánsson, 2015; Schwartz & Sharpe, 2006). The application of wisdom was viewed as
crucial for navigating complex situations in schools and making morally sound decisions (Kristjánsson, 2015;
Schwartz & Sharpe, 2006).
Furthermore, the experts highlighted the importance of demonstrating generosity through giving attention and
time to students, as this boosts their engagement and supports their moral development (Berkowitz & Bier, 2004;
Lickona, 1993). Ensuring justice in the classroom by providing all students with equal opportunities to succeed,
regardless of their backgrounds was also deemed essential (Berkowitz & Bier, 2004; Lumpkin, 2008). Practicing
respect towards students and colleagues was seen as contributing to building a positive and ethical educational
environment (Lumpkin, 2008; Noddings, 2012). Lastly, embracing humility was viewed as helping teachers
accept feedback and foster continuous learning, which is crucial for their personal and professional growth
(Kristjánsson, 2015; Schwartz & Sharpe, 2006).

Table 2
Key Elements
Items / Elements
Total item
score
% of
Agreement
Voter
Consensus
Finding deeper
meaning in work
Cultivating Eudaimonia in teaching helps teachers
find deeper meaning in their work, resulting in
increased job satisfaction.
27
**100
Suitable
Continuous growth
and contribution
Pursuing Eudaimonia inspires teachers to grow
and actively contribute to their school community
continuously.
27
**100
Suitable
Recognizing the
broader scope of
education beyond
knowledge transfer
Teachers who prioritize Eudaimonia recognize
that education encompasses knowledge transfer
and the development of students' character.
27
**100
Suitable
Maintaining worklife
balance
Achieving Eudaimonia in their professional lives
enables teachers to maintain a healthy work-life
balance, which is crucial for their overall well-
being.
27
**100
Suitable
Teaching with
passion
Focusing on Eudaimonia allows teachers to teach
with genuine passion, which positively impacts
their students' learning experiences.
26
**96.3
Suitable
Preparing students
for a well-rounded
life
Teaching with Eudaimonia in mind encourages
educators to prepare students for both academic
achievement and a well-rounded, fulfilling life.
27
**100
Suitable
Viewing teaching as
part of a meaningful
life
A life grounded in Eudaimonia helps teachers see
their role as educators as part of their effort to
achieve a meaningful and fulfilling life.
27
**100
Suitable
Note: ** Percentage of agreement (>70%)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9953
www.rsisinternational.org
The experts also reached a strong consensus on the critical role of eudaimonia or the pursuit of human flourishing
in teacher character development (see Table 2). They identified several key aspects of eudaimonia that are vital
for effective teaching, including finding deeper meaning in one's work, continuous growth and contribution to
the school community, recognizing the broader scope of education beyond knowledge transfer, maintaining a
healthy work-life balance, teaching with genuine passion and preparing students for a well-rounded life.
Furthermore, the strong consensus on the critical role of eudaimonia suggests that teacher character development
should be approached with a holistic focus on the overall well-being and flourishing of educators, encompassing
not only the development of specific virtues but also the cultivation of a sense of purpose, meaning, and work-
life balance (Annas, 2011; Gürol & Kerimgil, 2010). This perspective aligns with the growing body of research
on teacher well-being and its impact on student outcomes (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009; Schussler et al., 2018).
The experts emphasized that cultivating eudaimonia in teaching helps teachers find deeper meaning in their work
resulting in increased job satisfaction (Gürol & Kerimgil, 2010; Schwartz & Sharpe, 2006). Pursuing eudaimonia
was also seen as inspiring teachers to grow and actively contribute to their school community continuously
(Annas, 2011; Kristjánsson, 2015). The experts noted that teachers who prioritize eudaimonia recognize that
education encompasses more than just knowledge transfer as it also involves the development of students'
character (Berkowitz & Bier, 2004; Lumpkin, 2008).
Additionally, the experts highlighted that achieving eudaimonia in their professional lives enables teachers to
maintain a healthy work-life balance, which is crucial for their overall well-being (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009;
Schussler et al., 2018). Focusing on eudaimonia was also viewed as allowing teachers to teach with genuine
passion, which positively impacts their students' learning experiences (Hargreaves, 1998; Ria et al., 2004).
Finally, the experts emphasized that teaching with eudaimonia in mind encourages educators to prepare students
for both academic achievement and a well-rounded, fulfilling life (Berkowitz & Bier, 2004; Lickona, 1993).

The findings of this study, which utilized the Nominal Group Technique to elicit expert consensus, provide
valuable insights into the key elements of teacher character development through the integration of core virtue
and eudaimonia. The strong consensus among the experts underscores the critical importance of these
philosophical and psychological frameworks in shaping the character and practices of effective teachers. The
strong consensus among experts underscores the relevance of these philosophical constructs in addressing the
challenges faced by modern educators.
The emphasis on cultivating virtuous character traits, such as honesty, courage, and justice, highlights the need
for a character-based approach to teacher education and professional development. By fostering the development
of these virtues, educators can become more effective role models and better equipped to navigate the ethical
challenges that arise in the classroom. Furthermore, the strong consensus on the critical role of eudaimonia
suggests that teacher character development should be approached with a holistic focus on the overall well-being
and flourishing of educators. This includes not only the development of specific virtues but also the cultivation
of a sense of purpose, meaning and work-life balance. This perspective aligns with the growing body of research
on teacher well-being and its impact on student outcomes, underscoring the need for a more comprehensive and
sustainable approach to supporting teachers.
While this study provides valuable insights into the expert consensus on teacher character development, further
research is needed to expand and deepen our understanding of this complex and multifaceted issue. Future
studies could explore a broader range of perspectives and empirical evidence on teacher character development
including studies that did not utilize the Nominal Group Technique to gain a more comprehensive understanding
of the topic. Longitudinal studies that track the long-term effects of teacher character development initiatives on
both teacher well-being and student outcomes would provide valuable insights into the sustainability and efficacy
of such programs.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9954
www.rsisinternational.org


1. Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford University Press.
2. Arthur, J. (2016). Virtuous character for the practice of education. Routledge.
3. Arthur, J., Kristjánsson, K., Walker, D., Sanderse, W., & Jones, C. (2017). Teaching character and virtue
in schools. Routledge.
4. Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. (2011). Subjective well-being in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & G.
Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 178–189). Oxford
University Press.
5. Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2004). Research-based character education. Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 72–85.
6. Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A research-driven guide for
educators. Character Education Partnership.
7. Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
8. Booker, J. M., & McNamara, L. A. (2004). Solving black box computation problems using expert
knowledge theory and methods. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 331–340.
9. Campbell, E. (2003). The ethical teacher. Open University Press.
10. Campbell, E. (2008). The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 357– 385.
11. Cantrill, J. A., Sibbald, B., & Buetow, S. (1996). The Delphi and nominal group techniques in health
services research. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 4(2), 67–74.
12. Carr, D. (2006). Professional and personal values and virtues in education and teaching. Oxford Review
of Education, 32(2), 171–183.
13. Carr, D. (2007). Character in teaching. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 369–389.
14. Carr, D. (2011). Virtue, happiness and well-being: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing
times. Routledge.
16. Day, C., Kingdon, R., & Martinez, C. (2011). Researching teachers’ professional lives. Routledge.
17. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A
guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott Foresman.
18. Gürol, A., & Kerimgil, S. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions towards personal and professional development.
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3321–3325.
19. Hansen, D. T. (2001). Exploring the moral heart of teaching: Toward a teachers creed. Teachers College
Press.
20. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teachers College Press.
21. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students.
22. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826.
23. Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press.
24. Jackson, P. W., Boostrom, R. E., & Hansen, D. T. (1993). The moral life of schools. Jossey-Bass.
25. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom. Review of Educational Research,
79(1), 491–525.
26. Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
27. Kristjánsson, K. (2015). Flourishing as the aim of education. Educational Theory, 65(4), 425–442.
28. Kristjánsson, K. (2020). Virtuous emotions. Oxford University Press.
29. Lapsley, D., & Narvaez, D. (2006). Moral development, self and identity. Erlbaum.
30. Lickona, T. (1993). The return of character education. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 6–11.
31. Lumpkin, A. (2008). Teachers as role models. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 79(2),
45–50.
32. Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Teachers College Press.
33. Norton, D. L. (1976). Personal destinies: A philosophy of ethical individualism. Princeton University
Press.
34. Nucci, L. (2017). Character development and the moral self. Routledge.
35. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University
Press.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI December 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9955
www.rsisinternational.org
36. OECD. (2021). Teachers and leaders in schools 2021: OECD teaching and learning international survey.
OECD Publishing.
37. Osguthorpe, R. (2008). On the possible virtues of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 193
199.
38. Parker, P., Martin, A., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. (2012). Teachers’ workplace wellbeing. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 82(4), 591–614.
39. Perry, C., & Linsley, S. (2006). The use of nominal group technique in evaluation research. Evaluation
Review, 30(3), 341–357.
40. Ria, L., Sève, C., Theureau, J., Saury, J., & Durand, M. (2004). Beginning teachers’ experience. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 20(8), 843–857.
41. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials. Annual Review of Psychology,
52, 141–166.
42. Sanger, M. N., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2013). The moral work of teaching and teacher education. Teachers
College Press.
43. Schussler, D. L., Jennings, P. A., Sharp, J., & Frank, J. (2018). Improving teacher wellbeing. Mindfulness,
7, 1–9.
44. Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. (2006). Practical wisdom. American Psychologist, 61(7), 611–620.
45. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. Free Press.
46. Sherman, N. (1997). Making a necessity of virtue. Cambridge University Press.
47. Slemp, G. R., Field, J. G., & Cho, A. S. (2020). Autonomy-supportive school leadership.
48. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 863–890.
49. Sockett, H. (2012). Knowledge and virtue in teaching and learning. Routledge.
50. Srivastava, S., Satsangi, A., & Satsangee, N. (2019). Nominal Group Technique: A tool for consensus
building. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10(8), 1128–1132.
51. Walker, R. (2005). Making sense of education. Routledge.
52. Waterman, A. S. (2013). The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia. American
Psychological Association.
53. Wong, A., Kristjánsson, K., & Darnell, C. (2021). Virtue interventions in teacher education. Journal of
Moral Education, 50(3), 321–337.
54. Wong, S., Lau, P., & Lim, S. (2023). Teachers’ flourishing and wellbeing in schools. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 120, 103908.