INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2469
www.rsisinternational.org
Decent Work in Ghana’s Gig Economy: Legal Gaps and Reforms
Nana Amma Adjovu
Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA)
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00187
Received: 04 October 2025; Accepted: 10 October 2025; Published: 07 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Ghana’s gig economy, driven by platforms such as Uber and Bolt, provides economic opportunities but also
exposes workers to vulnerabilities due to limited labour protections under the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651).
Considered independent contractors, gig workers lack access to social security, collective bargaining, and safety
protections. This paper examines legal gaps in the labour law framework and advocates reforms aligned with
International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards, proposing a hybrid dependent contractor” category,
platform-funded social protections, and algorithmic transparency. It addresses specific challenges, including the
identified legal gaps, institutional constraints, and informality, while leveraging the Digital Ghana Agenda and
promoting multi-stakeholder collaboration. Although the paper recognises that much remains to be done to
integrate gig workers into the labour law framework, it acknowledges that a phased approach fosters decent
work and positions Ghana as a leader in Africa’s digital labour regulation.
Keywords: Digital Platforms, Gig Economy, Labour Law, Workers’ Rights, ILO Standard
INTRODUCTION
Ghana’s gig economy, particularly platform work, requires regulatory responses. The challenges within its gig
economy reflect a global pattern identified by the International Labour Organisation. The ILO (2021) has
highlighted that while digital labour platforms create new economic opportunities, they often do so by blurring
the boundaries of employment, leading to widespread precariousness and a deficit in social protection. This
global framework underscores that the situation in Ghana is a local manifestation of a systemic issue requiring
tailored regulatory responses. The gig economy in Ghana is driven by digital platforms such as Uber and Bolt,
which offer vital opportunities to tackle unemployment. It also exposes workers to unstable conditions because
they are classified as independent contractors. Section 175 of the Labour Act defines ‘‘workers’’ as individuals
engaged under employment contracts, excluding gig workers. As a result, gig workers operate outside the
protections of the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651), facing significant labour issues and legal gaps. This article
examines the relationship between Ghana's labour law framework and the evolving gig economy, how gig
workers are classified under current laws, and strategies aligned with the International Labour Organisation
(ILO) standards that promote decent work. Drawing on experiences from South Africa and the UK, as well as
national initiatives such as the Digital Ghana Agenda, the paper advocates for a hybrid worker category (Van
Belle et al., 2023). Despite existing legal gaps, coordinated reforms could position Ghana as a leader in Africa
in regulating the gig economy in line with the ILO’s principles of decent work. Therefore, the paper highlights
the challenges of worker classification under the Labour Act, the protection gaps for gig workers classified as
independent contractors, and the significance of ILO standards in guiding reforms to ensure fair and decent
working conditions.
Contextualising The Gig Economy
A gig economy is a work system in which organisations rely more on independent contractors and freelancers
than on full-time employees. According to Hudek (2003), the term “gigis a colloquial expression meaning
work for a period of time” and originates from the music industry (Huđek & Širec, 2023). He further states that
the term was originally coined by jazz musicians in the 1920s as an abbreviation of “engagement” to describe
any aspect of performance, such as assisting in a performance or participating in one. In the business world, the
term gig” connotes engagement, though it is limited to a short-term span of work or jobs. Thus, the gig economy
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2470
www.rsisinternational.org
consists of short-term contractors and freelancers providing specialized services without long-term employer
commitments. Thus, however short these jobs are, the gig economy has grown quickly in both size and
importance recently, yet its impact on labour rights has been largely ignored. De Stefano explains that the gig
economy involves task-based, platform-mediated work, with workers classified as independent contractors (De
Stefano, 2015). Types of work within the gig economy includecrowd work” and “work-on-demand via various
technological apps,' where the demand and supply of work are matched online or through mobile applications.
These forms of employment can provide a good match of job opportunities and flexible working hours. However,
they can also lead to serious work exploitation. This situation has led to increased misclassification of workers'
employment status, a major issue in the gig economy that affects the basic labour rights of gig workers.
Nevertheless, the ILO grants these rights to all workers regardless of employment status and recognises the role
of social partners in this regard. We have seen the labour sector experience significant changes in the 21
st
century,
sparking numerous debates about the influence of technology on this change, with online digital platforms
facilitating the growth of the gig economy. Although the gig economy involves more than just platform work,
companies like Uber have come to exemplify the changes it has brought about (Rohlinger & Sobieraj, 2022).
Digital platform capitalism, exemplified by firms such as Jumia and Uber, has the potential to reshape
employment and working conditions for an increasing share of the workforce. Many workers in the digital
economy face insecure employment conditions that threaten their health, a common issue among today's working
class in high-income countries. Like Guy Standing and Mike Savage’s concept of the precariat,” digital
platform workers may constitute a new social class or may not fit into any existing class (Muntaner, 2018).
Nonetheless, their conflicts over wages, benefits, employment conditions, and collective action closely align
with those of other members of the working class.
Scholarly work within the African context confirms this structural vulnerability. A 2021 research by Fairwork
Ghana on platform work in Ghana argues that the algorithmic management practices of digital platforms
effectively create a 'digital enclosure,' replicating and sometimes intensifying the power imbalances found in the
traditional informal economy. This perspective moves the analysis beyond individual worker-platform contracts
to a critique of the underlying economic model. While most employees in Africa face the risk of losing their jobs
and falling into unemployment at the mercy of their employers, citizens of most parts of East Africa and South
Africa enjoy some degree of job security due to their progressive laws protecting workers' rights, where an
employee’s job could be secured even before they commence work. This is well exemplified in the case of
Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd v Manquele (2005) 26 ILJ 749 [LAC], where the courts clarify that in South African
Labour Law, the conclusion of an employment contract grants the individual “employee” status, entitling them
to protections under their Labour Relations Act, regardless of whether they have begun their duties. Employers
are thus cautioned against unilaterally withdrawing such offers, as doing so may constitute a dismissal. This,
however, is not the case in Ghana, as employment is concluded only on the day the contract stipulates as the
commencement date, and the worker’s right accrues only from the day he officially starts work. Moreso, the
kind of protection noted above in the South African case may not extend to individuals working in the gig
economy due to misclassification of their employment status. Despite these gaps, the labour market in Africa
has undergone significant changes in recent years, driven by technological progress. High unemployment levels
and growing dissatisfaction with traditional workplace cultures have emerged, especially following the COVID-
19 pandemic. For example, although gig work is not a new concept, more South Africans are now opting to leave
conventional employment in favour of freelancing and gig-based opportunities. These freelance and gig workers
typically operate online, offering their skills to multiple clients. They also benefit from greater flexibility and
autonomy to set their own terms. The internet connects gig workers with businesses and consumers, creating an
on-demand, cost-effective labour market (De Stefano, 2015). For workers, the gig economy offers freedom and
flexibility often lacking in traditional jobs. In the same vein, businesses gain access to adaptable, low-cost labour
(Bajwa et al., 2018). As they noted, Woodcock and Graham believe that companies can efficiently outsource
tasks through gig platforms (Woodcock, 2021).
Additionally, Anwar and Graham (2021) emphasise that the gig economy promotes economic inclusion, a vital
advantage in a country like South Africa, where youth unemployment disproportionately affects women and
Black communities (Anwar & Graham, 2021) (Africa, 2021).. Online gig work offers young people low barriers
to entry for earning an income while gaining valuable skills and experience (Palhad et al., 2023). Despite these
benefits, the gig economy continues to present challenges that require proactive engagement from all
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2471
www.rsisinternational.org
stakeholders to ensure sustainable and equitable growth. Such engagements are also relevant in Ghana, where
the gig economy is growing rapidly.
In the UK, employment status remains a complex issue that continues to attract attention, particularly with
developments such as the expansion of the digital gig economy. According to a 2017 report by the CIPD, the
UK government describes the gig economy as “participants who trade their time and skills through online
platforms (websites or apps), providing a service to a third party as a form of paid employment (CIPD, 2023).
This definition resonates with Hudek's 2023 definition of the gig economy. The case of Uber BV & Others v
Aslam & Others ([2021] UKSC 5 for instance, is a landmark decision concerning employment rights within
the UK's gig economy. In this case, the plaintiffs, who were drivers for Uber BV, sued the company, claiming
they were workers under the law and that the company had denied them the rights and wages associated with
that status. In its ruling, the UK Supreme Court relied on the judgement in Byrne Bros (Formwork) Ltd v
Baird [2002] I.C.R 667 to hold that workers who do not qualify as employees under the law but are in
subordinate and dependent positions to their employers, similar to employees, should enjoy the same protections
afforded to employees whose roles are substantially and economically similar. Earlier, the European Court of
Justice in the case of Allomby v Accrington and Rossendale [2004] ECR 1-87365 had interpreted the term
'worker' to mean that “there must have been a consideration for a person or worker, who, for a specific period,
performs services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he receives remuneration.
The European Court of Justice’s definition confirmed the UK Supreme Court's holding that even if the plaintiff
in the Aslam case could have qualified as an independent contractor, as long as they received remuneration for
their work for the company, they qualified to be recognised as workers, and thus entitled to all benefits associated
with that role.
Once again, under UK law, how someone’s employment status is classified — whether self-employed, a worker,
or an employee affects their employment rights and the employer’s legal responsibilities. The Supreme
Court’s ruling in Uber v Aslam that Uber’s drivers were not self-employed but were actually ‘workers’, along
with many other cases, highlights the legal risks employers face if they do not correctly classify their staff’s
employment status and ensure this classification aligns with their employment rights. As a result,
significant reforms have been necessary, requiring organisations to stay informed about potential changes to
worker status and to reinforce workers’ rights. The UK government has actively addressed employment rights
within the gig economy. They have been focusing on worker status and right-to-work checks. For example, the
government and employment tribunals have introduced several regulatory changes to protect gig workers,
including implementing health and safety measures, ensuring access to minimum wages and benefits, clarifying
employment status, and enforcing job accountability among gig employers. For gig employers, compliance with
these new rules will be crucial. Adjusting business models and establishing new record-keeping and reporting
systems may increase costs, but these changes also offer opportunities for businesses. Employers are expected
to enhance their reputation and trust by prioritising worker welfare, thereby attracting and retaining top talent.
Meanwhile, the new regulations are likely to have broader economic and social impacts, such as addressing
income disparity and social mobility, and ensuring equal pay for all workers at the same level. This followed the
UK’s Home Secretary announcing these changes, emphasising that employment checks would be extended for
the first time in UK history to cover businesses hiring gig economy and zero-hours workers in sectors such as
construction, food delivery, beauty salons, and courier services (Seddon, 2025). This move aims to bolster trust
in those sectors. Unfortunately, the situation in the UK contrasts with that in Ghana, where there are no explicit
provisions in the Labour Act for such a worker category. There is also no case law to highlight the protection of
gig workers, as the UK has done.
A. Ghana’s Gig Economy
Ghana's labour market has recently faced increasing pressures in the informal economy, where many gig workers
operate (Labour Statistics Bulletin (2025 July Edition)). This trend primarily affects young graduates, who find
it difficult to secure formal employment. As a result, many have moved into the informal labour sector. They
have been driven by the limited capacity of the formal economy to absorb new entrants. The growth of the gig
economy reflects broader structural changes in Ghanas labour market. With few formal jobs and rising living
costs, young Ghanaians are increasingly turning to gig work, such as ride-hailing (e. g., Bolt, Uber), food
delivery, and freelance services. This shift is facilitated by digital transformation, 60% smartphone penetration,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2472
www.rsisinternational.org
and government initiatives such as the Digital Ghana Agenda (GSMA Intelligence, 2024). In Ghana, the gig
economy benefits both workers and businesses by offering flexibility and additional income in a strained job
market. For companies, outsourcing labour to independent contractors reduces operational costs. However, gig
workers face notable challenges, including low net earnings (after platform fees of 20-25%), occupational
hazards such as accidents, lack of insurance (Fairwork Ghana Report, 2022), and algorithmic management,
which assigns tasks and can lead to arbitrary deactivations. A Fairwork Ghana study estimated that the gig
workforce ranges from 38,000 to 258,000 active workers. The project involved stakeholdersincluding
workers, platform managers, and policymakersto assess labour conditions and promote best practices. Despite
its growing significance, Ghana's Labour Act (2003 (Act 651) excludes gig workers from minimum wage
protections and social security benefits because it only recognises employer–employee relationships. The
situation increases job insecurity as the Act does not address key issues in the gig economy. The absence of
minimum wages or benefits for gig workers, gender disparities, with women often facing harassment, leaves
workers vulnerable to surveillance. Weak data protection under the Data Protection Act (2012 (Act 843)) has
the same effect, making it difficult for women to integrate into gig platform jobs (Office, 2021). The expansion
of the gig economy emphasises the urgent need for legal and regulatory reforms to recognise gig workers under
labour laws. This will ensure fair pay, social protections, and strengthen data privacy safeguards. Without
intervention, the precarious nature of gig work is likely to persist, deepening inequalities within Ghana's evolving
labour market. The labour relations landscape in Ghana is undergoing significant change, driven by the rise of
the gig economy, remote work, and technological advancements. Given these developments, it is vital to examine
their impact on workers' rights, legal frameworks, and future challenges.
Legal Framework
The existing Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651), mainly addresses traditional employment relationships and
independent contractors, but does not explicitly account for the unique characteristics of the gig economy.
Despite efforts by the International Labour Organisation to develop regulations to protect platform and gig
workers, misclassification prevents them from benefiting from the legal protections available to employees under
Ghanaian law. Policy responses in Ghana have been limited, with no definitive regulations or legal reforms to
address these issues. We will examine how classification, the Labour Act, and the ILO standards influence the
promotion of decent work for gig workers.
A. Worker Classification
Labour protections are good for the workers who receive them, but many protections are only available to
workers classified as “employees”. In Ghana, gig work is rapidly growing alongside the rise of digital labour
platforms. However, Ghanaian labour law currently has a legal gap concerning platform workers, as the Labour
Act of 2003 (Act 651) defines employees but does not recognise the category of platform or gig workers.
Therefore, digital labour platforms in Ghana classify gig workers as independent contractors, enabling platforms
to sideline employee rights such as minimum wages, regulated working hours, paid leave, and social security
contributions. Though gig workers in Ghana may seem to enjoy flexibility, they are often subjected to significant
control by platforms through algorithms, ratings, and account bans. It questions their status as truly independent
contractors, as misclassification denies them the legal protections available to employees under Ghanaian law.
It leaves them with little or no voice or recourse in negotiations or grievance procedures, as platforms act as both
employers and dispute resolvers. Accordingly, platforms label workers as contractors, but algorithmic control
over tasks and pay implies a dependency similar to that of employees, with Uber/Bolt drivers reporting arbitrary
deactivations (De Stefano, 2015) (Peterlongo & Marrone, 2025.). As a result, comparable cases, such as Uber
v. Aslam, advocate adopting a hybrid worker” category. Ghana should consider adopting a hybrid “dependent
contractormodel to address its high informality rate (86%) and the policy ambitions outlined in the Digital
Ghana Agenda. Algorithms facilitate surveillance, with the Data Protection Act providing weak enforcement.
Women, for example, face safety risks from late-night deliveries, with harassment reports from Fairwork Ghana,
highlighting the need for regulatory updates as the gig economy reshapes traditional employment worldwide.
By observation and experience, the era of the standard "9-to-5" job is ending; more workers value flexibility and
autonomy, preferring to work independently on their own terms. However, this shift has exposed gaps in labour
protections, leaving many gig workers vulnerable to exploitation.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2473
www.rsisinternational.org
B. Labour Act, 2003
The Labour Act’s binary classification of workers in Ghana fails to recognise the unique nature of platform-
based gig work (Awal, 2022), effectively excluding gig workers from essential legal protections such as
minimum wage, redundancy pay, and safeguards against unfair dismissal. This exclusion contradicts the absolute
right to work guaranteed under article 24 of the Constitution of Ghana, raising important constitutional
questions. While the Act does provide protections for traditional employees, its inadequate scope leaves gig
workers vulnerable, with limited avenues to challenge unfair labour practices. There is potential for
constitutional litigation to assert gig workers’ rights, as seen in other African jurisdictions like Kenya and South
Africa, where courts have been instrumental in advancing workers’ protections in evolving labour markets. To
address these challenges, a phased policy approach is recommended. In the short term, administrative measures
could clarify gig workers’ employment status and establish minimum labour standards tailored to platform work.
Over the longer term, a comprehensive legislative overhaul should create a clear legal framework specifically
for the gig economy, extending protections including safe working conditions, fair wages, and social security.
Such reforms will empower gig workers, ensure fair treatment, and support sustainable economic growth. By
aligning labour laws with Ghana’s growing gig economy, the government can promote innovation and job
creation while safeguarding workers’ rights in a rapidly transforming labour market. Regulating gig work is thus
both a matter of fairness and a strategic investment in Ghana’s inclusive future of work.
C. International Labour Organisation (ILO) Standards for Gig Work and Their Relevance to Ghana
The International Labour Organisation (ILO) has recently committed to creating binding global standards
specifically for gig work, also known as platform work an area of labour characterised by short-term, task-
based jobs mediated by digital platforms according to the Human Rights Watch Report in 2025. This move is
a significant step as gig workers worldwide often face insecure working conditions, including misclassification
as independent contractors, low and unstable wages, lack of access to social security, and opaque algorithmic
management systems that limit their labour rights protections. ILO standards for gig work aim to ensure fair and
favourable conditions for all platform workers, regardless of their classification or employment status. The ILO’s
decent work agenda, as captured in their 1999 and 2023 Reports emphasises social protection, rights at work,
and social dialogue. Relevant standards include Conventions No. 87 and No. 98 (1948, 1949), which guarantee
freedom of association and collective bargaining, Convention No. 102 (1952), which sets social security
standards for pensions and health benefits, and Recommendation No. 204 (2015), which promotes formalising
informal work, Convention No. 190 (2019) which addresses workplace violence, critical for female workers,
and Platform Work Principles (2023) which advocate fair classification, algorithmic transparency, dispute
resolution, social protection, and data rights. ILO standards are highly relevant to Ghana’s gig economy,
addressing its unique socio-economic, legal, and cultural contexts while aligning with national development
goals. Ghana’s labour market is 86% informal, reflecting the characteristics of gig worklack of contracts,
irregular income, and limited protections (GSS, 2023) This informality makes Recommendation No. 204
essential, as formalising gig work through social protections could transition workers into structured systems
without losing flexibility. For example, platform-funded contributions to the Social Security and National
Insurance Trust (SSNIT) and the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), in accordance with Convention
No. 102, would address the exclusion of gig workers from the National Pensions Act, 2008 (Act 766). In 2023,
only 14% of informal workers contributed to SSNIT, emphasising the need to expand coverage (GSS, 2023).
The socio-economic context amplifies the significance of the ILO. Gig work employs thousands, especially
young people, in urban areas such as Accra and Kumasi, where unemployment remains a pressing issue
(Fairwork Ghana, 2021). However, low earnings are often below GHS 1,500 per month after fees, and the lack
of benefits sustains insecure conditions, in violation of the ILO’s decent work standards. Women, who comprise
30% of gig workers, encounter greater risks, including harassment during late-night deliveries, underscoring the
need for Convention No. 190 to establish safety protocols (World Report, 2025). Algorithmic biases that
penalise part-time availability further disadvantage women managing caregiving responsibilities, highlighting
the importance of fair classification and transparency, as outlined in the 2023 Platform Work Principles. Legally,
the Labour Act’s exclusion of gig workers from collective bargaining violates Conventions No. 87 and 98.
Forming a Gig Workers’ Union, as seen in Denmark, would create avenues for negotiations on commission rates
and deactivation policies, addressing existing power imbalances (ILO, 2022). The Data Protection Act, 2012
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2474
www.rsisinternational.org
(Act 843), aligns with the ILO’s data rights principle but requires stronger enforcement to curb platform
surveillance, particularly given workers’ limited awareness of their rights. Ghana’s policy landscape heightens
the relevance of the ILO. The Digital Ghana Agenda emphasises digital job creation, recognising the economic
contributions of platforms (Fairwork Ghana, 2023.). Integrating labour reforms into this agenda aligns with
Recommendation No. 204, which views protections as catalysts for economic development. Ghana’s
ratification of Convention No. 190 in 2022 commits it to tackling workplace violence, which directly correlates
with gig workers’ safety concerns. Regionally, aligning with the African Union’s Digital Transformation
Strategy (2022) supports standardisation efforts and positions Ghana as a leader in Africa’s regulation of the gig
economy (Ghana-Digital-Economy-Policy-Strategy, 2022). By addressing informality, gender disparities, and
legal gaps, ILO standards offer a tailored framework for fair gig work in Ghana.
Implementation Challenges And Opportunities
The precarious nature of gig work worsens the challenges within Ghana's already extensive informal sector,
which, according to the Ghana Statistical Service (2025), employs over 65% of the working population. This
suggests that the growth of the gig economy is not creating a new, protected class of workers but is instead
enlarging an existing landscape of informality through digital tools, a concern also highlighted by many
practitioners and policymakers on the subject. Ghana's employment sector has experienced various
developments in recent years, highlighting both challenges and opportunities amid changing economic
conditions. For example, Ghana has introduced several programmes to reduce unemployment, especially among
young people. Initiatives such as the Youth Employment Agency (YEA) and Planting for Food and Jobs (PFJ)
have been created to foster opportunities in agriculture and other sectors. There is an increasing focus not only
on creating formal-sector jobs but also on recognising the importance of the informal economy, which plays a
vital role in employment. Efforts continue to support informal workers through training and improved access to
capital. To address the skills gap, programmes focused on vocational training and technical education have been
expanded. Partnerships with private sector organisations and NGOs aim to equip young people with relevant
skills for the job market. The legal challenge is that the Ghana Labour Act’s binary classification excludes gig
workers from ILO protections, and amending it faces legislative challenges (Shepherd, 2025). The Data
Protection Act lacks provisions specific to platforms. The National Labour Commission (NLC), as an institution,
also lacks the resources to monitor algorithms or regulate multinational platforms (Fairwork Ghana, 2023). As
a social challenge, platforms may oppose reforms that raise costs, as seen in California, thereby complicating
low worker earnings and contributions. There have also been records of pushback in the gig market, as reported
by Fairwork Ghana. As a result, Ghana’s 86% informal workforce resists formalisation due to distrust in
institutions like SSNIT, as well as the guarded algorithms of platforms, and the capacity to regulate them exceeds
Ghana’s current ability (WIEGO_Statistical_Brief, 2020) (World Report, 2025).
Despite the challenges encountered in implementing the gig economy in Ghana, significant opportunities remain
to promote its growth. One key opportunity is policy integration, where necessary reforms could be incorporated
into the Digital Ghana Agenda. The idea would be to build on initiatives such as the platform-funded social
security pilot proposed by the Ministry of Communications in 2023. As a technological innovation, with
technical support from the International Labour Organisation (ILO), the establishment of a Digital Labour
Inspectorate, financed through platform fees, could greatly enhance institutional oversight. Blockchain and
mobile applications also offer the potential to improve transparency and strengthen enforcement mechanisms
within gig platforms. Additionally, social dialogues could be established to encourage collaboration among
stakeholders by creating a dedicated Gig Economy Taskforce. This task force could potentially utilise Fairwork
Ghana's expertise to pilot workers’ unions and implement safety measures. Addressing the sector's widespread
informality, subsidised contributions combined with targeted awareness campaigns can help overcome
resistance to formalisation and to participation in social protection. Finally, Ghana could benefit from adopting
established regulatory models from other jurisdictions, including the European Union’s presumptive
employment classification and South Africa’s bargaining councils framework, which can provide structured
negotiation and protection mechanisms for gig workers (Pape, 2025). Together, these opportunities present a
comprehensive pathway to address existing challenges and create a more inclusive, secure, and transparent gig
economy in Ghana (Zeid et al., 2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2475
www.rsisinternational.org
RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
While the proposed recommendations are vital, their successful implementation requires a realistic assessment
of potential hurdles. This section outlines a phased implementation plan, anticipates counterarguments from key
stakeholders, and proposes mitigating strategies. One of the core legal hurdles is the current classification of gig
workers as 'independent contractors,' which excludes them from the scope of existing labour laws. To mitigate
this and related issues, the following reforms are recommended to align Ghana’s gig economy with ILO
standards while ensuring clarity and policy relevance for implementation.
A. Introduce a Hybrid Worker Category (“Dependent Contractor”)
Amend the Labour Act to create a legal worker category called “dependent contractor,recognising gig workers’
economic dependence on platforms. This category will grant rights such as minimum wage guarantees, social
protection access, and collective bargaining, balancing flexibility with fundamental labour protections. The legal
definition of a dependent contractor must be based on clear criteria, such as the level of platform control (e.g.,
algorithmic management of tasks), financial dependence on platform income, and integration into the platform’s
branding and operations. These criteria can draw on precedents such as the UK Supreme Court decision in Uber
BV v. Aslam ([2021] UKSC 5). A possible statutory clause might define a dependent contractor as a worker
engaged by a digital platform under significant control and entitled to protections outlined in relevant labour
sections.” This amendment would balance workers’ flexibility with fundamental labour protections, thereby
addressing core ILO Conventions No. 87 and 98 on freedom of association and collective bargaining. The
Ministry of Employment should lead consultations with both platform operators and gig workers to refine this
category, with a view to legislative feasibility and enactment.
B. Extend Social Protection to Gig Workers
Integrate gig workers into SSNIT and NHIS through amendments to the National Pensions Act. Introduce
platform contributions alongside worker contributions, supported by a tiered subsidy scheme for low earners, to
enhance social security coverage and financial inclusion. Platform operators should be compelled to contribute
13.5% of workers’ earnings to SSNIT, with workers paying 5.5%, reflecting formal employment arrangements.
To improve affordability, a tiered contribution scheme subsidised by the government, such as a 50% subsidy for
workers earning below GHS 1,000 per month, should be introduced in line with ILO Convention No. 102 on
social security standards.
C. Ensure Algorithmic Transparency and Platform Accountability
Platform accountability must be strengthened by mandating disclosure of algorithmic task allocation and
deactivation criteria under the Data Protection Act. Establish a specialised Digital Labour Inspectorate within
the National Labour Commission to monitor compliance, enforce penalties, and provide affordable dispute
resolution. The NLC’s mediation services should help reduce worker deactivation disputes in line with the ILO’s
2023 Platform Work Principles. To enhance worker safety, platforms should incorporate features such as app-
based panic buttons for vulnerable groups, particularly female workers, aligning with ILO Convention No. 190
on violence prevention in the workplace.
D. Establish a Gig Economy Taskforce
Create a multi-stakeholder Taskforce by 2026 involving government, trade unions, platforms, and civil society.
The Taskforce will lead pilot programs for social protection contributions, support the formation of a Gig
Workers’ Union, promote safety and digital skills training, and report annually to Parliament. It should also
support the creation of a Gig Workers’ Union with the authority to negotiate fair commission caps at 15% and
transparent deactivation policies, in line with ILO Conventions No. 87 and 98. Additionally, the Taskforce must
implement safety training programmes and the use of panic buttons to decrease harassment incidents by 30% by
2028, as projected by Human Rights Watch.
E. Leverage Technology and Regional Collaboration
Use blockchain and mobile applications to enhance transparency in social security contributions and facilitate
anonymous reporting of labour violations. Ghana should actively engage with the African Union to harmonise
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2476
www.rsisinternational.org
gig economy regulations across the continent, drawing on legislative initiatives such as Nigeria’s draft Gig
Economy Bill. Hosting a regional summit will provide an opportunity to share Ghana’s experience and establish
its leadership role in developing standards for the gig economy in Africa. The union aims to harmonise gig-
economy regulations across regions and position Ghana as a leader in digital labour governance in Africa.
Indeed, Ghana’s gig economy offers significant growth opportunities but faces challenges posed by outdated
legal frameworks and worker vulnerabilities. This five-point reform package offers a clear, practical path to align
national laws with ILO standards, enhancing worker protections, platform accountability, and social security
inclusion. By adopting hybrid worker recognition, extending social protections, ensuring transparency,
institutionalising stakeholder collaboration through a Gig Economy Taskforce, and leveraging technology
alongside regional engagement, Ghana can modernise its labour market and promote inclusive, decent work in
the platform economy. These measures would also support social security inclusion and establish dispute
resolution mechanisms for gig workers. Overall, the ILO’s developing binding standards on gig work are highly
relevant to Ghana’s evolving labour market. They provide a pathway to close existing legal gaps and ensure
decent working conditions for millions of platform workers operating under precarious, largely unregulated
conditions. Aligning with international labour standards would strengthen Ghana’s commitment to fair labour
practices and foster inclusive economic growth within the platform economy. Nonetheless, active policy
intervention at the national level is crucial to convert these global standards into tangible legislative and
regulatory reforms. A hybrid worker category, platform-funded protections, and a Gig Economy Taskforce align
with Ghana’s Digital Ghana Agenda, addressing challenges such as legal gaps and platform resistance. The
recommendation promises measurable progress, positioning Ghana as a leader in Africa’s digital labour
regulation. By prioritising decent work, Ghana can balance flexibility with fairness, thereby contributing to
global labour policy discussions. This approach supports Ghana’s Digital Agenda and establishes the country as
a regional leader in gig economy regulation, promoting fair labour conditions and sustainable economic growth.
Active government commitment is essential to translate these reforms into tangible benefits for millions of gig
workers.
Conflict Of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication
of this article.
REFERENCES
1. 221103_fairwork_ghana-report-2022_RZ.pdf. (2022). Retrieved 11 October 2025, from
https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2022/11/221103_fairwork_ghana-report-2022_RZ.pdf
2. Africa, S. S. (2021, December 19). 2021 | Statistics South Africa. https://www.statssa.gov.za/?m=2021
3. Ahies. (2023). Retrieved 13 October 2025, from
https://statsghana.gov.gh/gssmain/fileUpload/pressrelease/2023_Quarter_Labour_Statistics_Bulletin_fu
ll_report.pdf
4. Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity
and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change, 25(2), 237–258.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420914473
5. Awal, M. (2022, June 15). Labour laws must recognise digital platform workers Fairwork Ghana. The
Business & Financial Times. https://thebftonline.com/2022/06/15/labour-laws-must-recognise-digital-
platform-workers-fairwork-ghana/
6. Bajwa, U., Gastaldo, D., Di Ruggiero, E., & Knorr, L. (2018). The health of workers in the global gig
economy. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8
7. CIPD | The true story of the UK gig economy. (2023, October 12). CIPD. https://www.cipd.org/uk/views-
and-insights/thought-leadership/cipd-voice/uk-gig-economy/
8. De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and
Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy(SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2682602). Social Science Research
Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
9. Fairwork-Ghana-Policy-Brief-2023-Final-Document.pdf. (2023). Retrieved 13 October 2025, from
https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2023/08/Fairwork-Ghana-Policy-Brief-2023-Final-
Document.pdf
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2477
www.rsisinternational.org
10. Fairwork_Report_Ghana_2021.pdf. (2021). Retrieved 13 October 2025, from https://fair.work/wp-
content/uploads/sites/17/2021/11/Fairwork_Report_Ghana_2021.pdf
11. African Union (2023), Ghana-Digital-Economy-Policy-Strategy.pdf. Retrieved 13 October 2025, from
https://moc.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Ghana-Digital-Economy-Policy-Strategy.pdf
12. GSMA Intelligence. (2024). GSMA Intelligence. Retrieved 11 October 2025, from
https://www.gsmaintelligence.com
13. Huđek, I., & Širec, K. (2023). The terminology and the concept of the gig economy. Ekonomski Pregled,
74(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.32910/ep.74.1.2
14. ILO. (2022, July 21). Annual Report 2021 | International Labour Organization.
https://www.ilo.org/publications/annual-report-2021
15. Labour Statistics Bulletin (2025 July Edition).pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 October 2025, from
https://statsghana.gov.gh/gssmain/fileUpload/pressrelease/Labour%20Statistics%20Bulletin%20(2025
%20July%20Edition).pdf
16. Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital Platforms, Gig Economy, Precarious Employment, and the Invisible Hand
of Social Class. International Journal of Health Services, 48(4), 597–600.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731418801413
17. ILO. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in
Transforming the World of Work. International Labour Organisation (ILO).
18. Palhad, S., Onwubu, S., Singh, R., Thakur, R., Thakur, S., & Mkhize, G. (2023). The Benefits and
Challenges of the Gig Economy: Perspective of Gig Workers and Small Medium and Micro Enterprises
(SMMEs) in South Africa. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v5i1.1051
19. Pape, Marketa (2025). European Parliament: Initiative to improve the working conditions of people
working in the platform economy | Legislative Train Schedule. European Parliament. Retrieved 13
October 2025, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/spotlight-JD22/file-improving-
working-conditions-of-platform-workers
20. Peterlongo, G., & Marrone, M. (2025). Platform work as potential labour: Algorithmic management and
everyday uncertainty in Deliveroo and Uber. Globalizations, 0(0), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2025.2518705
21. Rohlinger, D. A., & Sobieraj, S. (Eds). (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology (1st
edn). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.001.0001
22. Shepherd, N. J. (2025). Gig Economy Workers Rights: Legal Classification and Social Protection in
Digital Labour Markets. International Journal of Law and Societal Studies, 2(1), 24–35.
https://doi.org/10.61424/ijlss.v2i1.379
23. Van Belle, J.-P., Howson, K., Graham, M., Heeks, R., Bezuidenhout, L., Tsibolane, P., Du Toit, D.,
Fredman, S., & Mungai, P. (2023). Fair work in South Africa’s gig economy: A journey of engaged
scholarship. Digital Geography and Society, 5, 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100064
24. WIEGO_Statistical_Brief_N21_0.pdf. (2020). Retrieved 13 October 2025, from
https://www.wiego.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/03/WIEGO_Statistical_Brief_N21_0.pdf
25. Woodcock, J. (2021). Technology, Labor, and the Gig Economy. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds),
The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology (1st edn, pp. 178–194). Oxford University Press
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.14
26. Work checks can cut illegal migration, pledges Cooper. (2025, March 30).
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy7xqwqxxxo
27. World Report 2025.pdf. (2025). Retrieved 13 October 2025, from
https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2025/01/World%20Report%202025.pdf
28. Zeid, R., Alrayess, D., Ajwad, M. I., Soytas, M. A., & Rivera, N. (2024). The Gig Economy and the
Future of Work: Global Trends and Policy Directions for Non-Standard Forms of Employment.
Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/41755