
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2539
www.rsisinternational.org







This research aims to find out how college and school teachers perceive their work-life quality and feelings at
work. The research involved 144 participants. Information was collected with the help of a questionnaire.
Teachers' perceptions regarding work-life quality were evaluated through the Walton (1975) "Quality of Work
Life Scale," and their alienation level was determined through the Elma (2003) "Work Alienation Scale." The
results indicated that teachers held negative perceptions about some topics of the Quality of Work Life scale,
particularly regarding fair and satisfactory remuneration and the connection between work and life in general.
All the sub-dimensions of both the Work Alienation and Quality of Work Life scales were found to be strongly
and primarily negatively related.
 Dimensions, Perception, Quality of Work Life, Teachers, Work Alienation.

The life of every individual is highly impacted by his or her occupation. As individuals invest lots of time and
energy in work, businesses need to enhance Quality of Work Life (QWL) so that employees will be more
contented. Workers are the most valued asset for organizations in today's world due to the nature of the global
economy. Technology and services have become more significant, and employees are the actual assets behind
an organization. They're more like the invisible strengths that make an organization successful. Nowadays,
organizations are paying greater attention to individuals rather than products or services to face changes in the
business world. QWL is extremely significant. The concept of QWL began in the 1960s and 1970s in Scandinavia
and the United States. It made its initial appearance at an International Labor Relations conference in 1972. As
demands on businesses and families increase, QWL is a key issue today. Yes, it is also the case that talking about
QWL may not always be simple, and if it is not attended to, it can generate alienation in the workplace, and the
other way around.
Workplace alienation may take many forms. It may feel like solitude or isolation from co-workers. It could also
be a feeling that your work doesn't matter or is routine. Another indicator is when employees feel their work isn't
appreciated or noticed. Regardless of how it manifests, alienation is extremely detrimental. It can cause things
such as reduced job satisfaction and decreased productivity. Job dissatisfaction typically stems from work
alienation. With increasing families being dependent on two incomes, where both members of the couple divide
domestic chores and work, there has been growing concern for work-life balance. That is why the need to
enhance QWL is critical for the general welfare of employees. If a movement is evoked to enhance QWL, it will
transform the entire system, work values, capitalism, and society as a whole.


In making work more human-oriented, individualizing the workplace, and transforming the manner in which
management and structure’s function, the concept of Quality of Work Life (QWL) attempts to transform the
work environment as a whole.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2540
www.rsisinternational.org
It takes into account the psychological and social requirements of the employees. It seeks to develop a culture
of work commitment that promises higher job satisfaction and productivity.
Quality of work life" is a description of how well or poorly the working conditions are in an organization for its
staff.
It's a broad term encompassing how one feels about every aspect of a job, such as pay, security on the job, the
work environment, and interpersonal relationships with persons and the organization. The definition of QWL
can vary from person to person. Some key definitions of Quality of Work Life (QWL) are as follows:

1. "Quality of Work Life is the extent to which work within an organization contributes to members feeling
well in terms of both material and psychological factors." - Harryson.
2. "Quality of Work Life is a process of mutual decision-making, cooperation, and creation of mutual
respect among management and workers." - D.S. Cohan.
3. "The degree to which members of an organization can satisfy their significant personal needs through
their experience in the organization." - Lloyd Suttle.
In 1979, the American Society of Training and Development established a "Task Force" on working life quality.
They also described QWL as: "QWL is a process by which work organizations enable all members to actively
and effectively participate in structuring the environment, methods, and outcomes of the organization. It is a
value-oriented process intended to accomplish two fundamental objectives: enhance the effectiveness of the
organization and upgrade the quality of working life for employees."
Employee productivity is impacted by the quality of their work-life. Research has indicated that employees with
high QWL are healthier and happier, both emotionally and physically.

There are eight general standards to define a quality work life, according to Richard E. Walton. He suggested
applying these same standards to assess QWL. These standards are:
  Individuals have varying notions of what amounts to fair and
enough compensation. Fair compensation is greater than the minimum wage but lower than the living
wage.
  All organizations have safe and healthy work environments based
on legal or ethical obligations. It is also in the interest of the organization to do so.
 Contrary to general assumptions, good work-life is
enhanced as employees exert more control over their work and have jobs that consist of important tasks
rather than pieces of them. QWL also provides scope for utilizing and developing human potential, such
as autonomy at work and involvement in planning.
    Because there are few higher-level jobs or education-based
barriers, most groups have few opportunities for advancement. QWL offers opportunities for future
development and stability through skill, knowledge, and credential enhancement.
    Facilitating upward mobility, developing a sense of community and
openness, fostering teamwork, and eradicating discrimination all assist in accomplishing social
integration in the workplace.
  QWL makes sure work, non-work, and family life are in equilibrium. Work hours,
such as overtime, unusual hours, traveling, transfers, and holiday time, should not intrude on social and
family life.
  QWL is interested in making work applicable to society in a manner that
is good for people. When an individual's labor serves society well, they experience a great sense of self-
esteem, and vice versa.
  QWL provides constitutional protection to workers
when it doesn't constrain them. Bureaucratic rules have to be adhered to, and managerial actions are

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2541
www.rsisinternational.org
frequently challenged. Workers are constitutionally protected against factors such as due process,
equality, freedom of expression, and privacy.

Work alienation is an adverse psychological condition in which employees feel disconnected from their work,
responsibilities, or fellow workers. It may result in feelings of isolation, powerlessness, or lack of purpose in
their work.
Reasons for work alienation may include a lack of control over day-to-day work, an absence of a sense of
purpose, failure to receive personal gratification through work, and company policies or management styles that
leave employees feeling undervalued.
This state may lead to decreased job satisfaction, lower performance, and increased employee turnover. Based
on Karl Marx's alienated labor theory, workplace alienation is the process of becoming disconnected or distanced
from oneself in the workplace.
It occurs when an individual is isolated from colleagues or feels that their occupation is not meaningful.
Marx recognized four forms of alienation in the workplace: feeling disconnected from the work itself, feeling
remote from the product of one's labor, feeling disconnected from fellow workers, and feeling estranged from
oneself. Some examples of work alienation are feeling detached or apathetic in your job, feeling neglected or
insignificant in your workplace, and having strained relations with managers or co-workers.

1. Make open conversation by providing an environment where employees feel safe to express their
opinions. Facilitate teamwork and embrace feedback.
2. Offer opportunities for employees to learn and develop. This makes them feel appreciated and included.
3. Reward employees for their efforts and appreciate their work.
4. Provide time for individuals to get together socially, such as team-building or social gatherings, to
establish relationships. If frequently feeling disconnected becomes an issue, hire someone outside of the
organization, such as a specialist, to assist with sessions or training.
5. Be more attentive to employees and not constantly correct them.
6. Don't speak to staff as if they are children who must be guided every minute.
7. Trekked them as competent adults.
8. Praise the good work employees do and recognize their strengths.
9. Inform employees about the goals of the company and how it is financially doing.
10. Empower workers to be given more responsibilities so they can grow and accomplish more.
11. Ensure everyone is treated justly, with equal opportunities and respect.

The relationship between work alienation and the quality of work life indicates that there is a need for a properly
organized and adjustable company structure in order to have a good workplace. This, in turn, leads to employees
being healthy, productive, and content. But when employees become unproductive and lack a sense of
belongingness to their work, with an ineffective organizational framework, it reduces the quality of work-life
balance. In order to secure or enhance the quality of work life, six essential factors are recommended by (1977),
and these are fair remuneration, reasonable hours of work, appropriate tasks, healthy and safe working conditions
with good administration, proper promotion avenues, and workers' rights to unionize.
Political, social, and economic circumstances, and physical features such as temperature, light, pollution, and
noise are also crucial factors. For school leaders, establishing sound work conditions is key to enhancing the
quality of work life among teachers. This involves providing opportunities for professional development, career
advancement, high motivation levels, workplace autonomy, and an open and friendly organizational culture.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2542
www.rsisinternational.org
Through this, work alienation can be prevented, and if it happens, work alienation can bring negative impacts
on both individuals and the organization.

The majority of society is impacted by the degree to which educational institutions achieve their objectives. It's
essential to take into account concepts such as Quality of work life and work alienation, which have the potential
to affect the manner in which organizations function. These concepts are central to school goal attainment,
student success, and enhancing the quality of education. Hence, knowing the extent to which teachers experience
Quality work-life and experience work alienation is the beginning of taking the appropriate measures to enhance
their work-life quality and decrease the perception of alienation. This research provides a significant contribution
towards this endeavour. It's also anticipated that the research will offer practical recommendations for enhancing
the teachers' work environment.


Private school and college teachers were randomly selected through cluster sampling. Out of the 150 selected
teachers, 144 were considered for analysis since some data were missing.

The "Quality of Work Life Scale," developed by Walton in 1975, was utilized to gauge the quality of work life
in this study. This scale comprises eight distinct areas. In order to measure work alienation, the "Work Alienation
Scale" of Elma C, created in 2003, was employed.

The Standard Deviations and the Arithmetic Mean were utilized to comprehend teachers' perceptions of work
alienation and quality of work life. As the data was not normally distributed, the Spearman Brown Rank
Correlation Coefficient was utilized in order to determine the relationship between work alienation and quality
of work life.

Table 1 Arithmetic Mean (AM) and Standard Deviation (SD) of the Teacher’s Perception about Quality of Work
Life
Walton Standards
N
𝑿
(AM)
SD
Reasonable and adequate compensation
144
7.289
0.330
Safe and Secure work environments
144
7.604
0.325
Ability to utilize and develop human potential
144
7.441
0.309
Career advancement Opportunities
144
7.436
0.302
Workforce Social Integration
144
7.478
0.341
Work life balance
144
7.418
0.335
Social applicability of work
144
7.561
0.346
Constitutionalism within the organizational work
144
7.600
0.327
Table 1 indicates that teachers placed " Safe and secure work environments " as the highest reason for a good
work-life balance, with a score of 7.604. This was followed by "Constitutionalism within the organisational
work" with a score of 7.600, then "Social applicability of work" with a score of 7.561. Next was "Workforce
Social Integration" with 7.478, "Ability to utilize and develop human potential" at 7.441, "Career advancement
Opportunities" at 7.436, "Work Life balance" at 7.418, and lastly "Reasonable and adequate compensation" at
7.289.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2543
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 2 Arithmetic Mean (AM) and Standard Deviation (SD) of the TeachersPerception about Work Alienation
levels
N
𝑿
(AM)
SD
144
5.513
0.310
144
5.833
0.318
144
5.796
0.291
144
6.560
0.226
Table 2 indicates that the teachers' mean level of perception regarding work alienation was highest in the aspect
of alienation from school, with a mean value of 6.560. It was followed by powerlessness with a mean value of
5.833, meaninglessness with 5.796, and isolation with 5.513.
Table 3 Correlation analysis to ascertain the relationship between teacher perceptions of Quality of Work Life
and work alienation









N
144
144
144
144
R
-0.2157
0.1635
-0.0385
-0.0025
P
0.0094
0.0502
0.6464
0.9759
   

N
144
144
144
144
R
-0.4259
-0.4026
-0.4208
-0.352
P
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
   

N
144
144
144
144
R
-0.447
-0.188
-0.388
-0.3568
P
0.0000
0.0234
0.0000
0.0000
 

N
144
144
144
144
R
-0.3686
-0.328
-0.413
-0.212
P
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0105
 

N
144
144
144
144
r
-0.3500
-0.5122
-0.3991
-0.2185
P
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0085

N
144
144
144
144
r
-0.0354
-0.5829
-0.0203
-0.0188
P
0.6735
0.0000
0.6980
0.7250
  

N
144
144
144
144
r
-0.553
-0.5722
-0.3965
-0.1867
P
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0249
 

N
144
144
144
144
r
-0.4467
-0.2157
-0.3925
-0.0333
P
0.0000
0.0094
0.0000
0.0000
P<.05
Table 3 indicates there were no significant relationships between Reasonable and adequate compensation and
the powerlessness sub-dimensions of work alienation, meaninglessness, and school alienation. Nonetheless,
there was a negative, low-level, and significant association with the isolation sub-dimension. It further states that
no significant relations existed between Reasonable and adequate compensation and the sub-dimensions of work
alienation for isolation, meaninglessness, and alienation from school. Once more, a low-level, negative, and
significant correlation was found with the powerlessness sub-dimension. A medium-level, negative, and
significant correlation was found between the perceived sub-dimensions of Quality of Work Life of
constitutionalism of the work organis Constitutionalism within the organizational work and safe and secure work

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2544
www.rsisinternational.org
environment, and the work alienation sub-dimensions of isolation, powerlessness, meaninglessness, and
alienation from school.
Moreover, there existed a medium-level, negative, and significant correlation between the perceived Quality of
Work Life sub-dimensions of social integration among workers and social significance of work, and the work
alienation sub-dimensions of isolation, powerlessness, and meaninglessness. Low-level, negative, and
significant correlation was also obtained with the sub-dimension of alienation from school. Low-level, negative,
and significant correlation was seen between the sub-dimension of QWL of reasonable and adequate
compensation and safe and secure work environment, and all work alienation sub-dimensions.

Teachers reported negative attitudes toward compensation, additional benefits, participation, and responsibility,
but reported positive attitudes toward other components of the Quality of Work Life scale. The mean scores
indicated that teachers reported alienation from school, powerlessness, meaninglessness, and isolation. Negative
and significant correlations were found between all Quality of Work Life sub-dimensions and the work alienation
sub-dimensions.

Give recognition for their contributions. To enhance teachers' satisfaction with compensation, a performance-
linked salary system may be initiated. The career advancement opportunities of teachers must be enhanced by
school leadership to minimize teachers' feelings of alienation from the school. The quality of work-life needs to
be modified to remove adverse opinions from the teachers. Quality of Work Life (QWL) is enabled by paying
attention to it, which makes the workplace a more humane place. It is meant to satisfy employees' basic and
higher-order requirements. It seeks to have more capable employees and create an atmosphere that encourages
them to advance professionally. Human resources are not merely to be used, but to be created, as per the theory.
The work environment is not supposed to be excessively stern. Employees are not to face too much stress, and
their humanity should not be overlooked or destroyed. It is not supposed to be frightening or excessively perilous.
Finally, it must enable, or not prevent, the worker from meeting other roles in life, that is, parent, spouse, or
citizen. That is, work must be part of the general development of society.
In conclusion, the extent to which employees in a firm can meet their individual needs while at work is referred
to as work-life quality. Its primary objective is to provide a working environment in which employees work
together and assist the company's goals.

1. Abouelenien, R. E. I., Abd-Elhady, M. H., Hussien, I. M., & Hashad, M. E. (2024). The effect of job
insecurity on employees job performance in the hospitality and tourism industry: The role of work
alienation. Journal of the Faculty of Tourism and Hotels-University of Sadat City, 8(1/1), 1-20.
2. Ahmad, N. A. (2024). The Mediating Role of the Two Aspects of Job Embeddedness between, Perceived
Social Support, the Quality of Work Life and Career Success, an Integrative Model of Organization,
Community (Fit-Link-Sacrifice). Humanistic Management Journal, 1-25.
3. Ahmad, S. (2018). Can ethical leadership inhibit workplace bullying across East and West: Exploring
cross-cultural interactional justice as a mediating mechanism. European Management Journal, 36(2),
223-234.
4. Ahmad, S., & Kaleem, A. (2020). Zooming in on the workplace bullying and turnover intentions
pathway: The role of wellbeing and a cultural boundary condition. Personnel Review, 49(2), 425-444.
5. Akar, H. (2018). The relationships between quality of work life, school alienation, burnout, affective
commitment and organizational citizenship: A study on teachers. European Journal of Educational
Research, 7(2), 169-180.
6. Dash, S. S., & Vohra, N. (2019). The leadership of the school principal: Impact on teachersjob crafting,
alienation and commitment. Management Research Review, 42(3), 352-369.

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2545
www.rsisinternational.org
7. Cherns, Albert (1975); “Perspectives on The Quality of Working Life, Journal of Occupational
Psychology, Cilt: 48, Sayı:3, s. 155–167.
8. Çiçek Korkmaz, A., & Torlak, K. (2024). Work alienation and quality of work life among nurses: A
descriptive cross‐sectional study. International Nursing Review, 71(4), 886-894.
9. Coetzee, M., & Oosthuizen, R. M. (2017). Work-role psychosocial flourishing: Its mediation role on
workplace bullying and employee turnover intention. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 27(3), 211-215.
10. Dajani, M. A. Z., & Mohamad, M. S. (2017). Perceived organizational injustice and counterproductive
behaviour. The mediating role work alienation evidence from the Egyptian public sector. International
Journal of Business and Management, 12(5), 192-198.
11. Dash, S. S., & Vohra, N. (2019). The leadership of the school principal: Impact on teachersjob crafting,
alienation and commitment. Management Research Review, 42(3), 352-369.
12. Efraty, D. ve SirgyJ.M. (1990); “The Effects of Quality of Working Life (QWL) on Employee Behavioral
Responses,Social Indicators Research, Cilt: 22, Sayı: 1, s. 31–47.
13. Einarsen, K., Salin, D., Einarsen, S. V., Skogstad, A., & Mykletun, R. J. (2019). Antecedents of ethical
infrastructures against workplace bullying: The role of organizational size, perceived financial resources
and level of high-quality HRM practices. Personnel Review, 48(3), 672-690.
14. Extremera, N., Mérida-López, S., Quintana-Orts, C., & Rey, L. (2020). On the association between job
dissatisfaction and employee’s mental health problems: Does emotional regulation ability buffer the link?
Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109710.
15. Falah Nodehi, M. (2020). Job alienation and its impact on teachers' job performance and quality of life
in shahroud county, iran (2017-2018). Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology, 9(1), 61-67.
16. Favaro, Aaron L., New Graduate Nurses: Relationships among Sex, Empowerment, Workplace
Bullying, and Job Turnover Intention” (2019). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6110.
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6110.
17. Fontes, K. B., Alarcão, A. C. J., Santana, R. G., Pelloso, S. M., & de Barros Carvalho, M. D. (2019).
Relationship between leadership, bullying in the workplace and turnover intention among nurses. Journal
of nursing management, 27(3), 535-542.
18. Goura, I., Mercanlý, A., Çapuk, S., & Yýldýrým, O. (2017). Impact of turnover intention on loneliness
and the mediating effect of work alienation. Business Management and Strategy, 8(1), 18-38.
19. Lee, J., & Lim, J. J. (2019). Workplace bullying and job attitudes: The moderating role of coping
strategies. International Journal of Business and Information, 14(1), 1-24.
20. Liu, N., Zhang, M., & Feng, B. (2022). The effect of work area on work alienation among China’s
grassroots judicial administrators. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 18784.
21. Ololube, N.P. (2006), Teachers' Job Satisfaction and Motivation for School Effectiveness: An assessment,
www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail? accno. ErisimTarihi: 9.03.2011.
22. Ozdayi, N. (1990). Comparative Analysis of The Image and The Work Of Teachers Working In Private
High Satisfaction and Job Stress. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Istanbul: İstanbul University Institute of
Social Science.
23. Paul, G. D., & Kee, D. M. H. (2020). HR, Workplace Bullying, and Turnover Intention: The role of Work
Engagement. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(1), 23-27.
24. Yadav, R. S., Dash, S. S., Sinha, S., & Patky, J. (2020). Impact of Work-Place Bullying on Turnover
Intention: A Study among Indian School Teachers. South Asian Journal of Management, 27(4).