INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2810
www.rsisinternational.org
Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Implementation in Construction Projects
Iman Fahmi Yusof., Siti Sarah Mat Isa
*
., Wan Norizan Wan Ismail., Norsyazwana Jenuwa., Nur ‘Ain
Ismail
Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology/Faculty of Built Environment/Universiti
Teknologi MARA/Perak Branch/Seri Iskandar Campus/ 32610 Seri Iskandar/Perak/ Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00216
Received: 27 October 2025; Accepted: 05 November 2025; Published: 21 November 2025
ABSTRACT
In advancing the construction industry toward the green path, it is crucial to embrace the use of advanced
technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI). This shift is strongly supported as a nation strives to achieve
its sustainable development goals. However, several challenges accompany this ambition, including the
demand for a proficient workforce, high initial expenses, and resistance to change. Thus, this study endeavours
to investigate the benefits of AI implementation, including the challenges that impede its adoption in
construction projects within the Malaysian construction industry. The data for this study were obtained from
G7 contractor firms in Selangor registered with the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). A
simple random sampling was used to determine the sample size. A total of 156 respondents participated in this
study. The data obtained was analysed using SPSS software. The findings highlighted the main benefits of
implementing AI in the construction industry, revealing a growing use of AI technologies, including AI-based
risk analysis and mitigation strategies to improve project outcomes, minimise potential disruptions and
enhance project quality control through real-time monitoring. Insufficient data quality and availability hinder
the effective utilisation of AI. Thus, this study recommends that the government offer more initiatives,
incentives, and training programmes to construction practitioners to enhance the integration of AI in
construction projects towards achieving environmental sustainability.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, contractor, construction project, Malaysian construction industry,
sustainability.
INTRODUCTION
The construction industry encompasses the entire value chain of the industry, including the construction of
buildings, civil engineering, specialised construction activities, manufacturing of construction products,
facilities management, building maintenance and services (Ozorhon et al., 2010; Rani et al., 2021). The
construction industry plays a crucial role in Malaysia’s economic development and has steadily contributed
around 3% to 5% of the country’s GDP annually over the last decade (DoS Malaysia, 2021). Even though the
construction industry contributes a small percentage to the Malaysian economy compared to services,
manufacturing, tourism, and agriculture, it remains the country’s most vital sector due to its spillover effect,
including its backward and forward connections to other industries. Despite its significance, the sector has long
been challenged by inefficiencies such as project delays, budget overruns, labour shortages, safety hazards and
severe impacts to the environment (Bamgbade et al., 2017). Thus, the Malaysian government has implemented
serious measures to enhance the construction sectors quality, safety, environmental sustainability, and
productivity for successful project completion.
As global trends push industries toward digital transformation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerges as a
powerful enabler for addressing these chronic issues. Technologies such as machine learning, computer vision,
real-time monitoring, and robotics are increasingly being integrated into various phases of construction, from
planning and design to site execution and maintenance, bringing potential for improved productivity, enhanced
quality, and reduced risks. In Malaysia, efforts to digitise the construction sector have gained momentum
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2811
www.rsisinternational.org
through initiatives like the Construction Industry Transformation Programme (CITP) and the Construction 4.0
Strategic Plan led by the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). However, the implementation of
IR 4.0 within the Construction Industry is still lacking tremendously despite having access to these
technologies (Alaloul et al., 2020). The AI adoption remains in its infancy, with uptake concentrated in large
firms and urban centers. Key barriers include high implementation costs, a lack of skilled professionals,
limited data infrastructure, and ethical concerns surrounding surveillance and job displacement. This study
aims to explore the impacts of AI implementation in Malaysian construction projects, identifying the benefits
and challenges that shape its future integration. By doing so, it seeks to provide actionable insights for
policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers to navigate the digital transformation of the construction
industry in Malaysia.
LITERATURE REVIEWS
AI in the Construction Industry
The construction industry is traditionally labour-intensive and slow in adopting digital technologies as
compared to manufacturing and automotive industries, resulting in persistent productivity and safety
challenges (Abioye et al., 2021). Thus, due to digital transformation pressures, sustainability demands, and
productivity challenges, there has been an accelerating interest in AI. The Malaysian construction industry has
made significant strides in positioning AI as a core element in the digital transformation of the construction
industry in redefining construction processes and enabling data-driven decision-making to enhance efficiency
and drive innovation.
Benefits of AI in construction projects
In the construction project, project management and planning are crucial areas where the integration of AI has
made a significant impact. Predictive analytics are now more accessible through software and tools powered
by AI (Bird et al., 2021). This advancement allows construction stakeholders to anticipate potential problems,
create better schedules, and make strategic decision-making supported by data-driven insights (Akinosho et al.,
2020). Consequently, this approach is increasingly seen as essential for enhancing productivity, reducing
delays, and lowering overall project costs in the dynamic landscape of Construction 4.0.
In addition, AI-integrated Building Information Modelling (BIM) have become more prevalent in the
Malaysian construction industry. Studies by Chen et al. (2022) and Xue et al. (2018) emphasise that AI-
integrated BIM can streamline workflow performance and facilitate better decision-making throughout project
lifecycles. AI-BIM integration supports early risk identification, can analyse vast amounts of design data,
detect conflicts more accurately, and recommend corrective actions in real time. This not only minimises
design errors and rework but also strengthens collaboration across multidisciplinary project teams. This
promotes sustainability and cost-effectiveness.
AI plays a crucial role in enhancing safety on construction sites and managing construction projects. By
integrating Internet of Things (IoT) devices with AI-powered sensors, it is now possible to monitor the
condition of a site in real time. These systems can identify potential hazards, track equipment usage, and alert
construction workers if safety protocols are violated (Zhang et al., 2021). This significantly improves
workplace safety and reduces accidents that can cause delays in projects. In the Malaysian construction
industry, the use of AI helps operations run more smoothly and fosters innovative approaches to project
development. Additionally, technologies such as drones, robotics, and predictive analytics are being gradually
adopted by major construction firms to enhance site productivity and improve safety outcomes.
Challenges of AI in construction projects
AI is increasingly recognised as a transformative capability for the construction industry, providing
opportunities to enhance productivity, safety, and improve project delivery. However, the adoption of AI
remains limited, and the construction industry is lagging other industries in digital maturity. The
implementation of AI technologies brings various challenges, including data accessibility, the need for
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2812
www.rsisinternational.org
technical expertise, financial difficulties, ethical considerations, and organisational culture. Understanding
these challenges is essential to ensuring the successful integration and long-term effectiveness of AI in
construction projects.
One of the primary challenges in implementing AI is the quality and availability of data. AI systems depend
heavily on structured and clean datasets to train predictive models and support real-time decision-making.
However, construction projects often produce fragmented, inconsistent, and unstructured data due to
decentralised project environments and manual documentation practices (Darko et al., 2020; Hilmy et al.,
2024). Inadequate data collection frameworks and limited standardisation hinder model accuracy and prevent
effective AI deployments (Zhong et al., 2022). Mohamed and Mohamad (2021) conducted a survey among
construction firms, identifying poor data quality, lack of interoperability, and high implementation costs as
primary barriers. Without reliable data ecosystems and supportive organisational structures, successfully
implementing AI is difficult. Consequently, AI systems struggle to deliver reliable insights, which limits
organisational trust and can lead to poor implementation outcomes.
Another major barrier is the high initial investment and financial risk associated with AI technologies.
Construction firms, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), often operate on tight project
margins and may view AI adoption as a costly and uncertain investment (Amuda-Yeboah et al., 2023). The
expenses related to hardware, software, licensing, cloud computing, and skilled labour can discourage the
implementation of AI. Furthermore, the return on investment (ROI) may not be immediately visible, creating
reluctance among decision-makers to commit resources to AI transformation (Abioye et al., 2021).
Skills gaps and workforce resistance also present serious obstacles. Successful AI adoption requires data
scientists, software engineers, digital specialists, and project managers who understand AI capabilities and
limitations. However, many construction organisations lack personnel with these competencies (Zhang et al.,
2022). Additionally, workers may resist digital transformation due to concerns about job security, fear of
technology, or lack of digital literacy (Farmer et al., 2021). This resistance can inhibit implementation and
hinder organisational learning.
METHODOLOGY
The unit of analysis of this study is the construction professionals employed by contractor firms registered with
the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) under grade G7 in Selangor. This study employed a
quantitative method by administering an online survey using Google Forms to this target population to obtain
their perceptions and responses to the questionnaire. According to CIDB, a total of 25,631 registered
contractor firms are classified from G1 to G7 in Selangor. However, this study specifically focuses on those
G7 contractor firms. Within this category, there are only 3,421 G7 contractors in Selangor. The sample size
was determined following the methodology proposed by Krejcie and Morgan (1970). Hence, to adequately
reflect a specific population, a sample size of 346 was deemed necessary for this investigation. Thus, a total of
600 questionnaires were distributed among the respondents, and 156 usable responses were received from all
sources. This amount indicates a response rate of 26%, which is considered acceptable. According to Nulty
(2008), a 20% response rate is deemed satisfactory.
This study used a 5-point Likert scale to measure each construct in the survey. The scale ranges from 1 to 5,
where 1 indicates ‘strongly disagree’, 2 indicates ‘disagree’, 3 indicates ‘neutral’, 4 indicates ‘agree’, and 5
indicates ‘strongly agreeregarding the benefits and challenges of AI implementation in construction projects.
The questionnaire consisted of three (3) sections. Section A: Demographic background, Section B: The
benefits of AI implementation in construction projects, and Section C: The challenges of AI implementation in
construction projects. The collected data were analysed using descriptive analysis using SPSS software. The
Mean Score (MS) analysis was employed to calculate the mean score for each variable and to rank the
variables based on the level of agreement among the respondents. The mean score ranking technique has been
widely used in the field of built environment studies to assess the relative significance or importance of
specific factors (Shi et al., 2013). The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient for the collected data is 0.942. These
figures were above the limit of .70, as suggested by Nunnally (1978, cited by Cheng et al., 2014, p.85). This
finding provides evidence of the consistency and reliability of the gathered data.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2813
www.rsisinternational.org
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
Demographic background
Table 1 displays the distribution of respondents based on their position within their respective firms.
According to the findings, all respondents are from the middle management level and hold a variety of
positions in the firms, including project manager, project engineer, construction manager, site manager, and
site supervisor, as well as quantity surveyor. This data shows that the information acquired is reliable, as the
respondents are knowledgeable and actively involved in the operation and management of construction
projects.
Table I Respondents Working Positions
Working Position
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Project Manager
32
20.5
Project Engineer
23
14.7
Construction Manager
26
16.7
Site Manager / Site Supervisor
38
24.4
Quantity Surveyors
37
23.7
Total
156
100
Meanwhile, Table II shows the distribution of respondents based on their working experience in the
construction industry. Among the 156 respondents, the majority (33.3%) had 610 years of experience,
indicating a substantial representation of middle-level professionals actively engaged in construction
operations. This is followed by 1120 years (32%) and more than 21 years (27.6%), indicating well-
experienced contractors with significant industry exposure. Meanwhile, only 7.1% of respondents had less than
5 years experience, reflecting the participation of younger contractor professionals.
Table II Respondents Working Experience
Working Experience
Percentage (%)
1 5 years
7.1
6 10 years
33.3
11 20 years
32.0
More than 21 years
27.6
Total
100
Benefits of AI implementation in construction projects
Based on the findings indicate that respondents highly value AI-based risk analysis and mitigation strategies,
with a mean score of 4.40. This suggests a strong consensus on their effectiveness in improving project
outcomes and minimising potential disruptions. Baryannis et al. (2018) support this view, noting that AI
techniques, such as machine learning and big data analytics, are successfully used to identify, assess, and
respond to supply chain risks, which ultimately enhances decision-making and adaptability. Additionally, real-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2814
www.rsisinternational.org
time monitoring and AI-driven data insights, which improve the quality of project control and assurance,
received a mean score of 4.36. The use of AI technologies to reduce human error and enhance project safety is
highly regarded, with a mean score of 4.35. This finding is aligned with Bigham et al. (2018), who mention
that the risk of accidents on the construction site can be significantly decreased by an AI platform’s ability,
which can identify hazards before and during the construction operation and recommend appropriate safety
standards. Furthermore, the construction industrys productivity and project timelines are dramatically
improved by AI applications, with a mean score of 4.32. In general, respondents perceive the implementation
of AI in construction projects as highly beneficial, as they acknowledge its ability to enhance various aspects
of project management and execution.
Table I Benefits of AI Implementation
Benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Implementation
Mean
Standard Deviation
Rank
AI provide risk analysis and mitigation strategies to improve project
outcomes and minimise potential disruptions.
4.40
0.721
1
AI-driven data insights and real-time monitoring enhance project quality
control and assurance.
4.36
0.733
2
AI technologies reduce human errors and enhance overall project safety
in construction.
4.35
0.748
3
AI applications significantly enhance productivity and accelerate project
timelines
4.32
0.480
4
AI-enabled automation streamlines repetitive tasks, allowing for better
focus on complex project requirements.
4.28
0.748
5
AI integration fosters innovation and competitiveness within the
Malaysian construction industry.
4.12
0.703
6
AI-driven tools and systems enable the reduction of costs and the
optimisation of budgets in construction projects.
4.04
0.813
7
AI-powered analytics and predictive modelling enhance decision-
making processes in construction project management.
3.99
0.810
8
The integration of AI improves project efficiency by optimising the
allocation of resources and scheduling.
3.72
0.494
9
Challenges of AI implementation in construction projects
Most respondents agree that the effective use of AI technologies is hindered by insufficient data quality and
availability, as reflected in the highest mean score of 4.50. This finding aligns with Whang et al. (2023), who
stated that unreliable AI models and poor decision-making outcomes stem from poor data quality, which
includes issues such as incompleteness, errors, and biases. As supported by Abioye et al. (2021) and Omar et
al. (2022), most of the construction information is stored in various formats like PDFs, CAD files, and
spreadsheets across different systems, often lacking consistency and control. Data collection is often viewed as
an administrative burden rather than a core project activity, and without clear incentives or training for field
staff, the accuracy and consistency of site-level data remain poor (Omar et al., 2022). Moreover, the lack of
collaboration and partnerships between construction firms and AI solution providers closely follows this
concern, with a mean score of 4.48. Data security and privacy are major concerns when adopting AI
applications, with a mean score of 4.46. This finding is consistent with Murdoch (2021), who revealed that AI
technologies pose significant threats to data security, heightening the risk of reidentification and serious
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2815
www.rsisinternational.org
privacy violations. Another significant challenge in Malaysia is the current infrastructure, which requires more
support for the effective implementation of AI in construction projects, reflected by a mean score of 4.33.
Additionally, the seamless integration of AI applications was hindered by financial constraints and regulatory
complexities, which received an average score of 4.22. Several studies have emphasised that financial
constraint is not merely limited to the purchase of AI tools but stems from a combination of structural,
technical, and organisational factors (Abioye et al., 2021; Alaloul et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2022). Furthermore,
the lack of skilled professionals compounds challenges. The shortage of data engineers and AI specialists
means that many firms depend on external consultants for implementation, inflating project budgets (Omar et
al., 2022). Accordingly, this perception can impede the growth of technology adoption in construction projects
within the Malaysian construction industry, leading many practitioners to prefer the traditional practices they
are accustomed to.
Table I Challenges of AI Implementation
Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Implementation
Mean
Standard Deviation
Rank
Insufficient data quality and availability hinder the effective utilisation
of AI technologies.
4.50
0.527
1
Lack of collaborations and partnerships between construction firms and
AI solution providers
4.48
0.501
2
Concerns regarding the security and privacy of data in adopting AI
applications.
4.46
0.551
3
The current infrastructure in Malaysia lacks support to implement AI
successfully in construction projects.
4.33
0.761
4
Financial constraints in AI implementation.
4.22
0.699
5
Regulatory complexities and unclear guidelines hinder the seamless
integration of AI applications.
4.22
0.863
6
There is a lack of skilled personnel knowledgeable about AI
technologies.
4.05
0.796
7
Resistance to change and a lack of willingness to embrace new
technologies.
3.98
0.793
8
There is a fear of job displacement among the existing workforce due to
AI adoption.
3.66
0.577
9
CONCLUSIONS
AI offers remarkable potential to tackle inefficiencies in the construction industry, improve safety, and
facilitate meeting environmental sustainability targets. Additionally, AI can significantly transform
construction operations by increasing efficiency, reducing risks, and supporting sustainable project delivery.
While the adoption of AI technologies requires investment in skills, infrastructure, and digital maturity, the
competitive advantages and operational improvements they offer are substantial. Thus, despite the challenges
that come with the implementation, the Malaysian construction industry is expected to invest more in AI-
driven digital transformation. Although challenges in adoption persist, strategic investments in digital talent,
robust data systems, and regulatory support can accelerate AI integration and foster Construction 4.0
transformation. The government, including other relevant agencies, must implement a vigorous range of
initiatives, incentives, and comprehensive training programs for construction practitioners to enhance the
integration of AI in the industry to effectively promote environmental sustainability and drive significant
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2816
www.rsisinternational.org
progress toward a more sustainable future. Thus, future research should focus on developing AI
implementation frameworks, assessing the construction industry’s readiness, and evaluating a comprehensive
strategy to overcome these challenges, allowing the full potential of AI to be used in construction projects.
REFERENCES
1. Abioye, O., Hall, D., & Akindele, J. (2021). A comprehensive study of AI in construction:
Contributions to resource and waste optimisation. Advances in Computer Science Research, 117, 120
130.
2. Akinosho, T., Oyedele, L., Bilal, M., Ajayi, A., Delgado, M., Akinade, O., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Deep
learning in construction: Current status, opportunities, and challenges. Automation in Construction,
118, 103311.
3. Alaloul, W. S., Liew, M. S., Amila, N., Abdullah, W., & Kennedy, I. B. (2020). Industrial Revolution
4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain Shams Engineering
Journal, 11(1), 225230.
4. Amuda-Yeboah, E., Manu, P., & Booth, C. (2023). Barriers to AI adoption in construction SMEs: An
international perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(2), 450-468.
5. Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2018). Supply chain risk management and artificial
intelligence: state of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production
Research, 57(7), 21792202.
6. Bamgbade, J. A., Kamaruddeen, A. M., & Nawi, M. N. M. (2017). Malaysian construction firms’
social sustainability via organizational innovativeness and government support: The mediating role of
market culture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 114124.
7. Basaif, A. A., Loo, S. C., & Alashwal, A. (2018). A review on the application of artificial intelligence
for risk analysis in construction projects
8. Bigham, G. F., Adamtey, S., Onsarigo, L., & Jha, N. (2018). Artificial intelligence for construction
safety: Mitigation of the risk of fall. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 10241037.
9. Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., Mabel, Z., & Song, Y. (2021). Bringing Transparency to Predictive
Analytics: A Systematic Comparison of Predictive Modeling Methods in Higher Education. AERA
Open, 7.
10. Chen, J., Zhang, J., Chen, X., & Li, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in smart construction
management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 28(4), 233-247.
11. Cheng, C. C. J., Yang, C. L., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business
performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 8190.
12. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., & Adabre, M. A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry:
Scientometric analysis and visualization. Automation in Construction, 118, 103291
13. DoS Malaysia. (2021). Department of Statistics Malaysia, Quarterly Construction Statistics Fourth
Quarter 2021, https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?.
14. Fang, W., Li, H., & Luo, X. (2022). Safety compliance monitoring using deep learning and computer
vision in construction. Automation in Construction, 140, 104391.
15. Farmer, N., Zhang, D., & Ashuri, B. (2021). Workforce digital readiness for construction automation
and AI. Automation in Construction, 132, 103946.
16. Hilmy, N. A. S., Aminudin, E., Zakaria, R., Pauzi1, N. N. M., Khoiry, M. A., Saar, C.C., Firmawan, F.
(2024). Potential applications of artificial intelligence (AI) for the Malaysian construction industry.
Advances in Computer Science Research, 117, 120140.
17. Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining size for research activities. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 30, 607610.
18. Mohamed, A. S., & Mohamad, B. (2021). Barriers to AI adoption in construction: A quantitative
analysis. Civil Engineering Journal, 45(2), 6675.
19. Murdoch, B. (2021). Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in
a new era. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1).
20. Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done?
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301314.
21. Omar, A. F., Zainordin, N., & Khoo, S. L. (2022). Barriers in implementing artificial intelligence (AI)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XIV October 2025 | Special Issue on Management
Page 2817
www.rsisinternational.org
and Internet of Things (IoTs) among the Malaysian construction industry. AIP Conference
Proceedings, 2432(1), 020028.
22. Ozorhon, B., Abbott, C., & Aouad, G. (2010). Innovation in Construction: A Project Lifecycle. SCRI
Research Report 4, August 2016, 903912.
23. Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and
management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction, 122.
24. Pattanshetti, S. S., & Mali, S. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence speeds up decision making in project
management: Opportunities and ethical considerations. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management.
25. Rafsanjani, H. N., & Nabizadeh, A. H. (2023). Towards digital architecture, engineering, and
construction industry through virtual design and construction and digital twin. Energy and Built
Environment, 4(2), 169178.
26. Rani, N. I. A, Syuhaida Ismail, Zainai Mohamed & Che Maznah Mat Isa (2021): Competitiveness
framework of local contractors in the Malaysian construction industry towards globalisation and
liberalisation, International Journal of Construction Management
27. Shi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R., Huang, J., & Pullen, S. (2013). Identifying the critical factors for green
construction - An empirical study in China. Habitat International, 40, 18.
28. Whang, S. E., Roh, Y., Song, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Data collection and quality challenges in deep
learning: a data-centric AI perspective. VLDB Journal, 32(4), 791813.
29. Xue, F., Jeelani, I., & Winch, G. (2018). Automated construction progress tracking using BIM and
computer vision. Automation in Construction, 89, 8090.
30. Zhang, S., Teizer, J., Pradhananga, N., & Eastman, C. (2021). Intelligent safety wear for proactive
monitoring of construction workers’ health and safety. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101245.
31. Zhong, R., Peng, Y., & Xiang, X. (2022). Data standards and interoperability for AI-enabled
construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(4), 04022025.