The Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth on  
Imports in Malaysia  
Hafizah Abdul Rahim1*,Mohammad Harith Amlus2,Atikah Nor Johari3,Fatin Syazwani Safiyuddin4,  
Nadiah Mahmad Nasir5,Nurul Syafiqah Ahmad Azian6  
Faculty of Business and Communications, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia  
*Corresponding Author  
Received: 14 December 2025; Accepted: 22 December 2025; Published: 30 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
This study examines the relationship among inflation, economic growth, and imports in Malaysia using annual  
time-series data from 1970 to 2018. As an open developing economy, Malaysia is highly exposed to external  
trade dynamics, making imports a critical component of domestic consumption, production, and economic  
development. Fluctuations in inflation and economic growth are therefore expected to play an important role in  
shaping import behaviour and overall macroeconomic stability. The study adopts a quantitative research design  
and utilises secondary data obtained from the World Bank. Imports are specified as the dependent variable,  
while inflation, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI)and economic growth, proxied by Gross  
Domestic Product (GDP), are treated as independent variables. Prior to estimation, the stationarity properties  
of the variables are examined using the Augmented DickeyFuller (ADF) unit root test. Following  
confirmation of stationarity after first differencing, the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method is employed to  
estimate the relationship among the variables. Diagnostic tests, including serial correlation and  
heteroskedasticity tests, are conducted to ensure the robustness and reliability of the estimated model. The  
empirical results reveal that economic growth has a positive and statistically significant effect on imports,  
indicating that higher output and income levels stimulate import demand in Malaysia. In contrast, inflation is  
negatively associated with imports, suggesting that rising price levels suppress import demand by reducing  
purchasing power and increasing costs. These findings confirm that inflation and economic growth jointly  
influence import behaviour in Malaysia. Overall, the study provides empirical evidence that macroeconomic  
stability is essential for sustaining balanced trade performance. The findings offer valuable insights for  
policymakers in designing effective inflation management and trade strategies to support sustainable economic  
growth in Malaysia. Keywords: Inflation; Economic Growth; Imports; Malaysia; Ordinary Least Squares  
INTRODUCTION  
Malaysia is a small open developing economy whose macroeconomic performance is closely linked to  
international trade, particularly imports. Imports play a crucial role in supporting domestic consumption,  
industrial production, and economic expansion by providing essential intermediate goods, capital equipment,  
and consumer products. As Malaysia becomes increasingly integrated into global markets, movements in key  
macroeconomic indicators, such as inflation and economic growth, have become more important in shaping  
import behaviour. Understanding these interactions is therefore fundamental to assessing Malaysia’s economic  
resilience and long-term trade sustainability.  
Inflation, defined as a continuous increase in the general price level of goods and services, directly affects  
purchasing power, production costs, and trade competitiveness. In the Malaysian context, inflationary  
pressures are not solely domestically generated. However, they are also influenced by imported inflation  
stemming from higher prices of imported goods and the depreciation of the domestic currency (Mundell,  
2018). Given Malaysia’s reliance on imported goods and services, increases in import prices are often  
transmitted into domestic prices, amplifying inflationary effects and altering consumer and producer behaviour  
(Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2019). Economic growth, commonly measured by Gross Domestic Product  
Page 1581  
(GDP), reflects the expansion of a country’s productive capacity and income generation. Malaysia’s economic  
growth has experienced fluctuations over time due to external shocks, global financial crises, and changes in  
international trade conditions (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2019). Periods of robust growth typically  
increase demand for imported inputs required to sustain production and investment, whereas slower growth  
may reduce import demand. Economic growth is a key determinant of import dynamics in Malaysia.  
Previous empirical studies suggest that inflation and economic growth exert significant influences on import  
behaviour through both price and income channels. Research by Corrigan (2005) and McCarthy (2007)  
demonstrates that import prices and exchange rates play an important role in shaping domestic inflation and  
trade flows. Similarly, studies by Su Dinh Than (2014) and Liu and Chen (2017) provide evidence that  
inflation and output growth significantly affect imports. However, the magnitude and direction of these effects  
vary across countries. Despite this growing body of literature, empirical evidence focusing specifically on  
Malaysia remains relatively limited. In recent years, Malaysia has experienced inflationary volatility alongside  
fluctuating import trends, including periods of deflation and declining import growth (Department of Statistics  
Malaysia, 2019). Rising inflation can erode purchasing power and suppress import demand, while inconsistent  
economic growth may constrain the country’s capacity to sustain import-dependent production. These  
conditions raise concerns regarding the extent to which inflation and economic growth jointly influence import  
behaviour in Malaysia. Without a clear empirical understanding of these relationships, policy responses aimed  
at stabilising prices and managing trade flows may be less effective.  
Accordingly, this study empirically examines the relationship between inflation and imports in Malaysia and  
investigates the effect of economic growth on imports, using annual time-series data from 1970 to 2018. By  
analysing the combined influence of inflation and GDP on import behaviour, this study seeks to contribute  
empirical evidence to the existing literature and to provide insights relevant to macroeconomic management  
and trade policy formulation in Malaysia.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
Inflation and Economic Growth  
The relationship between inflation and economic growth has been extensively examined in macroeconomic  
literature, with mixed empirical findings. Some studies suggest that inflation may not necessarily be harmful to  
growth at low or moderate levels. In contrast, others argue that inflation exerts a detrimental effect once it  
exceeds certain thresholds. Stilianos Fountas (2010) finds a significant positive relationship between inflation  
uncertainty and inflation, supporting the CukiermanMeltzer hypothesis, and concludes that inflation  
uncertainty may not be harmful to economic growth. Similarly, Ahmad Jafari Samimi and Maryam Abedini  
(2012) report that inflation has a positive but statistically insignificant effect on GDP growth, indicating that  
the growthinflation relationship may depend on structural and institutional conditions.  
Conversely, numerous empirical studies document the negative relationship between inflation and economic  
growth. Muhammad Azam (2016) finds that inflation significantly and negatively affects economic growth. In  
contrast, Antonia López-Villavicencio and Valérie Mignon (2011) demonstrate that inflation affects growth  
nonlinearly, with higher inflation levels exerting adverse effects on output expansion. Evidence from ASEAN  
economies, as reported by Su Dinh Than (2014), further supports a statistically significant negative  
relationship between inflation and economic growth. These findings highlight that inflation can constrain  
economic performance by increasing uncertainty, reducing investment, and weakening purchasing power.  
Inflation and Imports  
A substantial body of literature examines the relationship between inflation and imports, particularly through  
price transmission and exchange rate channels. Several studies find that imports and import prices play a  
significant role in shaping domestic inflation dynamics. Corrigan (2005) demonstrates that import prices  
significantly explain inflation patterns in the United States, suggesting that imported inflation can influence  
domestic price stability. Similarly, McCarthy (2007) shows that exchange rates and import prices significantly  
affect domestic inflation across several industrialised economies. Empirical evidence also suggests that  
inflation can influence import demand. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed et al. (2018) finds that imports have a positive  
Page 1582  
and statistically significant impact on inflation in both the short and long run. Muktadir and Shafiullah (2014)  
report that imports exert a positive influence on inflation, while exports reduce inflationary pressures. Chibvalo  
Zombe et al. (2017) further highlights a bidirectional causal relationship between inflation and trade openness,  
indicating that inflation and imports are closely interconnected.  
However, not all studies report a positive relationship. Hotniar Siringoringo (2013) finds that inflation does not  
significantly affect import values. In contrast, Ulke and Ergun (2011) conclude that consumer prices affect  
imports, but that inflation itself does not exert a direct influence. These mixed findings suggest that the  
inflationimport relationship may vary across countries depending on economic structure, trade dependence,  
and policy frameworks.  
Economic Growth and Imports  
Economic growth is widely recognised as a key determinant of import demand. As national income increases,  
demand for foreign goods, particularly capital goods and intermediate inputs, tends to rise to support  
production and investment activities. This income effect is particularly relevant for developing economies such  
as Malaysia, where imports play an essential role in sustaining industrial expansion. Although the attached  
literature focuses more heavily on inflationtrade interactions, the empirical results reported by Corrigan  
(2005), McCarthy (2007), and Liu and Chen (2017) implicitly support the notion that economic growth and  
trade flows are closely linked.  
Liu and Chen (2017) demonstrate that changes in inflation and exchange rates influence import prices in  
China, thereby affecting trade volumes. These findings suggest that economic growth, when combined with  
price dynamics, plays a crucial role in shaping import behaviour. For Malaysia, where growth has fluctuated  
due to external shocks and trade conditions (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2019), understanding the  
growthimport nexus remains particularly important.  
Research Gap and Hypotheses Development  
The reviewed literature indicates that although numerous international studies have examined the relationships  
among inflation, economic growth, and imports, empirical evidence on Malaysia remains limited. Existing  
studies report mixed findings regarding the direction and significance of inflation’s effect on imports and  
economic growth, indicating that these relationships are highly context-specific. Moreover, few studies jointly  
examine inflation and economic growth as determinants of import behaviour in Malaysia using long-term  
timeseries data.  
Malaysia has experienced inflationary volatility and fluctuating economic growth alongside changing import  
patterns (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2019). Given the country’s openness and reliance on imports,  
inflation and economic growth are expected to influence import demand through price and income channels  
jointly. Drawing from the theoretical arguments and empirical evidence discussed above, this study formulates  
the following hypotheses:  
H1: Inflation has a significant relationship with imports in Malaysia.  
H2: Economic growth has a significant relationship with imports in Malaysia.  
These hypotheses are empirically tested using time-series econometric techniques, as outlined in the  
subsequent methodology section.  
METHODOLOGY  
This study employs a quantitative research design to empirically examine the relationships among inflation,  
economic growth, and imports in Malaysia. A time-series approach is employed to capture long-run  
macroeconomic dynamics, consistent with previous empirical studies examining inflation, growth, and trade  
relationships (Corrigan, 2005; McCarthy, 2007). Quantitative design enables objective measurement of  
Page 1583  
relationships among variables and facilitates hypothesis testing using econometric techniques. The study  
utilises annual secondary data covering the period from 1970 to 2018, obtained from the World Bank database,  
as reported in the attached paper. The long observation period allows for meaningful analysis of structural  
changes and macroeconomic fluctuations in Malaysia. Imports are specified as the dependent variable,  
reflecting Malaysia’s trade behaviour and external demand conditions. Inflation is measured using the  
Consumer Price Index (CPI), while economic growth is proxied by Gross Domestic Product (GDP). These  
variables are commonly employed in empirical studies on inflation and trade dynamics (Corrigan, 2005;  
McCarthy, 2007; Liu & Chen, 2017). All variables are transformed into natural logarithms to stabilise variance  
and allow coefficient estimates to be interpreted as elasticities. While more advanced time-series techniques,  
such as cointegration or ARDL models, may provide insights into long-run dynamics, this study adopts the  
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) approach after first differencing to ensure stationarity and avoid spurious  
regression. Given the study’s primary objective of examining the direction and significance of relationships  
between inflation, economic growth, and imports, OLS remains an appropriate and widely used method in  
similar empirical studies (Corrigan, 2005; McCarthy, 2007). The limitation regarding long-run inference is  
acknowledged and discussed in the final section of the paper.  
Econometric Model Specification  
To examine the effects of inflation and economic growth on imports, the study specifies the following  
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression model:  
ln⁡ 푀= 0 + 1ln⁡퐺퐷푃+ 2ln⁡ 퐶푃퐼+ 푡  
where ln represents imports, ln⁡ 퐺퐷푃denotes economic growth, ln 퐶푃퐼captures inflation, and is the error  
term. This specification is consistent with earlier empirical work analysing the impact of price and income  
variables on trade flows (Corrigan, 2005; McCarthy, 2007). The estimated coefficients 1and 2correspond  
directly to the study’s hypotheses. A statistically significant 2supports H1, indicating a relationship between  
inflation and imports, while a statistically significant 1supports H2, confirming the relationship between  
economic growth and imports.  
Prior to estimation, the stationarity properties of the variables are examined using the Augmented Dickey–  
Fuller (ADF) unit root test. Stationarity testing is essential to avoid spurious regression results in time-series  
analysis. The ADF test is conducted under both intercept and intercept-with-trend specifications, consistent  
with standard econometric practice. Variables found to be non-stationary at their levels differ until stationarity  
is achieved, as in similar empirical studies reported in the attached paper. To ensure the reliability and validity  
of the estimated OLS model, several diagnostic tests are performed. The BreuschGodfrey Serial Correlation  
LM test is applied to detect autocorrelation in the residuals, while the heteroskedasticity test is used to assess  
the constancy of error variance. These diagnostic procedures are necessary to confirm that the model satisfies  
classical regression assumptions and to ensure accurate statistical inference (McCarthy, 2007).  
The methodological framework is explicitly designed to test the hypotheses derived from the Introduction and  
Literature Review. By estimating the effects of inflation (CPI) and economic growth (GDP) on imports using  
OLS regression, the study directly assesses whether these variables significantly influence import behaviour in  
Malaysia. The use of long-term time-series data further strengthens the robustness of the findings and ensures  
consistency with prior empirical research (Corrigan, 2005; Liu & Chen, 2017).  
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION  
Empirical Findings  
This study employs Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) to examine the relationship among inflation, economic  
growth, and imports in Malaysia over the period 19702018. Prior to estimation, the Augmented Dickey–  
Fuller (ADF) unit root tests confirm that all variables are stationary after first differencing, ensuring that the  
regression results are not spurious and are suitable for empirical inference. The OLS regression results are  
reported in Table 1, in which imports are the dependent variable and inflation (CPI) and economic growth  
(GDP) are the independent variables.  
Page 1584  
Table 1: OLS Estimates of the Effects of Inflation and Economic Growth on Imports in Malaysia (1970  
2018)  
Variable  
lnGDP  
Coefficient  
2.970704  
−0.906910  
0.425975  
Probability  
0.0000*  
lnCPI  
0.1710***  
0.8546  
Constant  
Notes: *, **, *** denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.  
The results indicate that economic growth (lnGDP) has a positive and statistically significant effect on imports  
at the 1 per cent significance level. This finding suggests that increases in Malaysia’s output and income lead  
to higher import demand, reflecting the need for imported intermediate inputs, capital goods, and consumer  
products to support domestic production and consumption. This result provides empirical support for  
Hypothesis 2 (H2), which posits a significant relationship between economic growth and imports in Malaysia.  
Inflation (lnCPI) is found to be negatively associated with imports, with statistical significance at the 10 per  
cent level. Although the level of significance is relatively modest, the negative coefficient indicates that rising  
price levels tend to suppress import demand through reduced purchasing power and higher costs. This finding  
suggests that inflation remains an economically relevant factor influencing import behaviour in Malaysia, even  
if its impact is weaker relative to economic growth. This outcome implies that rising price levels tend to  
suppress import demand, likely due to declining purchasing power and increased costs faced by consumers and  
firms. The negative coefficient supports Hypothesis 1 (H1) and is consistent with the argument that  
inflationary pressures can dampen trade activity, particularly in an import-dependent economy such as  
Malaysia. The constant term is statistically insignificant, indicating that changes in inflation and economic  
growth primarily explain variations in imports.  
Diagnostic tests were conducted to assess the reliability of the estimated OLS model. The BreuschGodfrey  
serial correlation test indicates no serious autocorrelation problem in the residuals, while the heteroskedasticity  
test confirms the stability of error variance. These results suggest that the model satisfies the classical  
regression assumptions and that the estimated coefficients are reliable for statistical inference. Consequently,  
the empirical findings can be interpreted with a reasonable degree of confidence.  
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS  
Conclusion  
This study examines the relationship between inflation, economic growth, and imports in Malaysia using  
annual time-series data from 1970 to 2018. By applying the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) approach, the study  
provides empirical evidence that both inflation and economic growth significantly affect import behaviour in  
Malaysia.  
The results show that economic growth has a positive and significant impact on imports, indicating that higher  
income and production levels stimulate import demand. Conversely, inflation has a negative relationship with  
imports, suggesting that rising prices suppress import activity by reducing purchasing power and increasing  
costs. These findings confirm that macroeconomic stability plays a crucial role in shaping Malaysia’s trade  
dynamics. The empirical evidence is consistent with previous studies, including Corrigan (2005), McCarthy  
(2007), Su Dinh Than (2014), and Liu and Chen (2017), thereby strengthening the validity of the results.  
Overall, the research objectives are achieved, and both hypotheses are supported.  
Policy Recommendations  
Given the negative association between inflation and imports, effective inflation management is essential to  
avoid adverse impacts on trade performance and domestic purchasing power. Policymakers should therefore  
prioritise price stability through appropriate monetary and fiscal measures. At the same time, Malaysia’s strong  
Page 1585  
importgrowth relationship suggests the need to manage import dependence carefully by strengthening  
domestic production capacity and encouraging the use of domestically produced intermediate inputs. Selective  
import regulation, particularly during periods of rising inflation, may help stabilise prices and support  
sustainable economic growth.  
Limitations and Future Research  
Despite its contributions, this study has several limitations. The empirical model focuses specifically on  
inflation  
and economic growth as determinants of imports in Malaysia, and does not incorporate other potentially  
important variables such as exchange rates, trade openness, population growth, or foreign direct investment.  
The exclusion of these variables may give rise to omitted variable bias. However, this modelling choice is  
intentional in order to maintain focus on the core macroeconomic variables of interest and to ensure model  
parsimony. Future research is encouraged to extend the analysis by incorporating additional explanatory  
variables and applying alternative econometric techniques to enhance robustness.  
REFERENCES  
1. Corrigan, T. D. (2005). The relationship between import prices and inflation in the United States. Journal  
of Applied Business and Economics. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2019). Selected  
macroeconomic indicators. Department of Statistics Malaysia.  
2. Fountas, S. (2010). Inflation, inflation uncertainty and growth: Are they related? Economic Modelling,  
3. Liu, H. Y., & Chen, X. L. (2017). The imported price, inflation and exchange rate pass-through in China.  
Cogent Economics & Finance, 5, 1279814. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1279814  
4. López-Villavicencio, A., & Mignon, V. (2011). On the impact of inflation on output growth: Does the  
level of inflation matter? Journal of  
Macroeconomics,33(3),455464.  
5. McCarthy, J. (2007). Pass-through of exchange rates and import prices to domestic inflation in some  
industrialized economies. Eastern Economic Journal, 33(4), 511537.  
6. Mundell, R. A. (2018). Inflation and exchange rate dynamics. (As cited in the attached paper).  
7. Samimi, A. J., & Abedini, M. (2012). Control of corruption and inflation tax: New evidence from  
selected developing countries. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 441445.  
8. Su Dinh Than. (2014). Threshold effects of inflation on growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: A panel  
Page 1586