INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 226
www.rsisinternational.org
Exploring Cultural Attitude and Nature
Relatedness Among Indigenous
People
Rhayzaly T. Blanco
1
, Ann Rose Bon
2
, Aila L. Nilo
3
, Ronald T. Umali, MAEd, LPT
4*
1,2,3,4
Southern Luzon State University Polillo Campus
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.916SCO0022
Received: 07 October 2025; Accepted: 13 October 2025; Published: 10 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study examined the relationship between cultural views and nature relatedness among Indigenous Peoples
in Polillo, Quezon. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, data were gathered from 40
respondents. Results revealed that participants strongly upheld positive cultural values and ecological awareness,
reflecting a deep sense of cultural identity. However, regression analysis showed that only age and sex
significantly predicted nature relatedness, with older individuals and women demonstrating stronger connections
with nature. Cultural attitude and educational attainment showed no significant influence. These findings suggest
that while Indigenous cultural values align with ecological consciousness, demographic factors play a more
crucial role in shaping nature relatedness. The results support the Biophilia Hypothesis and Self-Determination
Theory, emphasizing how intrinsic motivation and lived experiences foster humannature connection.
Keywords: Cultural Attitude, Nature Relatedness, Indigenous People.
INTRODUCTION
Culture influences an individual's identity, conduct, and perspective. Cultural ideas, values, conventions, and
traditions are intricately woven into the way of life of Indigenous Peoples (IPs), encompassing their relationship
with the natural world. Toigo et al. (2022b) asserts that culture influences individuals' values, behaviors, and
interpretations of their surroundings. The Commission on Higher Education (CHED), via CMO No. 2, s. 2019,
acknowledged this cultural significance by incorporating Indigenous Peoples’ Studies into higher education
curricula to enhance cultural identity, ancestral domain rights, and self- governance, as highlighted in RA 8371
or the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act. Initial interviews done by the researchers indicate a significant decrease
in the engagement of Indigenous Peoples in cultural events and traditional practices in Barangay Taluong,
Polillo, Quezon. Sumitro et al. (2024) emphasized the vital role of Indigenous Peoples as cultural makers in
perpetuating local culture, whereas Nicholas (2021) highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by Filipino
Indigenous groups in preserving their rich traditions.
Although numerous studies have confirmed the essential role of Indigenous Peoples (IPs) in nature conservation
and biodiversity protection through their local knowledge and practices (Abas et al., 2022; Keaulana et al., 2021),
research on the specific cultural attitudes and degree of nature-relatedness among IP communities in particular
regions, such as Polillo, Quezon, remains insufficient. Niigaaniin and MacNeill (2022) highlighted that
Indigenous traditions and environmental practices are interconnected through rituals, rites, and oral narratives,
which cultivate reverence for nature. Lugo-Espinosa et al. (2024) noted that globalization, migration, and
insufficient land rights have led to the deterioration of cultural practices. This signifies a necessity for specialized
research to investigate the persistence and practice of these links in tiny, rural communities. The deficiency in
community-specific knowledge hinders a comprehensive understanding of the impact of Indigenous cultural
identity on contemporary environmental stewardship.
This study is essential for comprehending the contemporary cultural perspectives and environmental
relationships of Indigenous Peoples in Barangay Taluong, Polillo, Quezon. The objectives are to: (1) evaluate
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 227
www.rsisinternational.org
the degree of cultural attitude regarding recognition of cultural values, linkages, preservation of traditions and
customs, and cultural Loss; (2) assess the extent of nature relatedness; (3) analyze the correlation between
cultural attitude and nature-relatedness; finally, (4) To determine the significant difference considering the
following moderating variables: age, sex, and educational attainment. This study examines how entrenched
cultural values influence environmental stewardship, informed by Self- Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan,
1985), which emphasizes the role of intrinsic motivation and cultural identity in behavior, and the Biophilia
Hypothesis (Wilson, 1984), which posits an inherent human inclination to engage with nature. This study
examines the prevailing cultural attitudes and environmental relationships of the Indigenous People community
in Polillo, Quezon. This initiative seeks to bolster the preservation of Indigenous knowledge and traditions by
exploring the intricacies of their cultural identity and environmental values. The results can inform culturally
responsive educational initiatives such as those endorsed by CHED (2019)and foster cultural contemplation
and continuity among the youth.
I. LITERATURE REVIEW
Cultural Attitude
The identity of indigenous communities is shaped not only by their lived experiences and indigenous narratives
but also by external forces such as national policies and societal norms. As Luza (2023) explains, internal factors
emerge from the indigenous peoples’ own worldview, rooted in organic culture and traditional knowledge, while
external factors include state policies such as the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997 (IPRA), which
institutionalizes their rights and recognition.
However, indigenous cultural valueswhich serve as both identity markers and moral compassesare
increasingly at risk of erosion in island communities, signaling a weakening of cultural identity (Titaley &
Watloly, 2021). Huynh, Gasparatos, Su, Lam, Grant, and Fukushi (2022) explained that cultural practices have
declined due to factors like species loss and limited access to traditional resources, which have altered songs,
work patterns, and ceremonies. These changes have disrupted cultural identity as communities shift their
livelihoods and elders lose their connection to the land. The authors also noted that displacement and relocation
weaken people's sense of place, while even those who remain experience solastalgiaa profound grief caused
by drastic environmental changes, threatening their sense of belonging and stability.
Achieving civilizational exchange in international communication requires recognizing shared values
particularly universal human happiness—as the “greatest common divisor” of understanding between different
cultures (Dehong, 2024). Similarly, Schultz et al. (2022) highlight that cultural values are essential to community
engagement and the long-term success of ecological restoration efforts.
Despite these challenges, cultural values remain essential, not only for preserving indigenous heritage but also
in influencing contemporary behaviors, such as promoting environmental stewardship and sustainable
consumption, as shown in the work of Chakraborty and Sadachar (2022). Furthermore, the cultural practices of
indigenous groups, such as those in San Emilio, Ilocos Sur, reflect deep ancestral ties and spiritual reverence,
reinforcing the importance of tradition in the continuity of indigenous identity (Absolor et al., 2023).
Nature Relatedness
Rooted in cultural identity and spiritual belief, the connection of Indigenous Peoples to nature transcends mere
resource dependence and reflects a holistic worldview grounded in respect, reciprocity, and sacredness. Among
the Kasepuhan of Indonesia, environmental practices are shaped by local wisdom passed through generations,
treating nature as a living, integral part of life rather than an object of exploitation (Pudjiastuti et al., 2021).
In the Philippine context, indigenous communities such as the Blaan regard natural phenomena as manifestations
of ancestral spirits, indicating a spiritual ecology where nature is deeply embedded in cultural traditions and
belief systems (Franca & Lumogdang, 2022). In the
Cordillera highlands, the valuation of ecosystem services extends beyond subsistence, encompassing cultural
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 228
www.rsisinternational.org
and regulatory functions, with perceptions differing according to age, gender, and livelihood, thereby revealing
the complexity of indigenous ecological knowledge (Paing et al., 2022). Huynh et al. (2022) explain that cultural
practices encompass a wide range of human interactions with nature, such as expressing creativity, caregiving,
and using natural resources for leisure and sustenance.
Current findings further emphasize the importance of conservation strategies that incorporate cultural heritage,
especially in indigenous territories where biodiversity and tradition intersect (Tanalgo et al., 2025). Similarly,
Indigenous worldviews such as that of the Māori illustrate how cultural identity enhances ecological
consciousness and environmental attitudes, reinforcing the idea that nature relatedness is a deeply internalized
and culturally informed disposition (Tassell-Matamua et al., 2020).
Materials And Methods
1. Research Design: This study employs a quantitative descriptive research design to examine the cultural
attitudes and nature-relatedness of indigenous people in Polillo Quezon. A descriptive approach is
appropriate as it aims to systematically measure and describe the levels of cultural linkages, cultural loss,
recognition of cultural values, preservation of tradition and custom, as well as their connection to nature.
This non- experimental design is suitable for addressing the research objectives by providing a clear
snapshot of the current cultural and environmental perspectives of the indigenous community.
2. Participants/Data Sources: The participants of the study were indigenous people from Barangay
Taluong, Polillo, Quezon, aged 18 and above. A total of 40 participants were selected through purposive
sampling to ensure inclusion of individuals with direct cultural experience and connection to nature.
Informed consent was obtained prior to data collection, and participants were assured of confidentiality
and voluntary participation in accordance with ethical standards.
3. Tools and Instruments: The study used two adapted questionnaires as primary data-gathering tools.
The first, adapted from Choi and Kim (2007), titled “Assessing Cultural Values: Developing an
Attitudinal Scale,” had a reported Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83 and measured cultural linkages, value
recognition, and tradition preservation. The second, adapted from Nisbet (2011), “Happiness is in Our
Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being,” also had a Cronbach’s
alpha of 0.83 and assessed levels of nature relatedness. Both used a 4-point Likert scale from Strongly
Agree (4) to Strongly Disagree (1).
4. Procedures: The study followed a systematic procedure beginning with the preparation phase, which
involved securing ethical clearance from the university research ethics committee and obtaining
permission from the chieftain of the indigenous group in Barangay Taluong, Polillo, Quezon. After
approval, the adapted questionnaires were finalized and pilot-tested for clarity and reliability.
During data collection, participants were selected using simple random sampling and were asked to complete
the survey only after signing an informed consent form that explained the study’s purpose, confidentiality
measures, and their right to withdraw at any time. The researchers personally administered the questionnaires to
ensure comprehension and accuracy of responses.
All data were treated with strict confidentiality, and participants’ identities were kept anonymous. The collected
responses were organized and analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency, mean, and percentage to
address the research objectives.
5. Analysis Techniques: The collected data were analyzed using quantitative methods to align with the
study’s aim of exploring the relationship between cultural attitude and nature relatedness among
indigenous people in Quezon Province. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean,
and standard deviation, were used to summarize participants’ demographic profiles and levels of cultural
attitude and nature relatedness. Pearson’s r correlation determined the relationship between the two main
variables, while one-way ANOVA tested for significant differences across demographic groups. Multiple
regression analysis with interaction terms was further applied to examine whether age, sex, and
educational attainment moderated the relationship between cultural attitude and nature relatedness.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 229
www.rsisinternational.org
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Summary of Descriptive Analysis
This subsection explored the level of the respondents’ cultural attitude and nature relatedness.
Table 1 Mean, Standard Deviation, Scaled Response, and Verbal Interpretation
Variables
Mean
Standard Deviation
Cultural attitude Strongly Disagree / Deeply Rooted
Recognition of Cultural Values
1.48
0.55
Linkages
1.88
0.63
Preservation of custom and tradition
1.64
0.60
Cultural Loss
2.46
0.73
Nature Relatedness Strongly Disagree/Strongly Connected
1.46
0.41
Table 1, based on negatively framed statements from the research instrument, reveals that Indigenous People in
Polillo, Quezon primarily endorse positive cultural values and a strong connection to nature. The low mean
scores on indicators such as recognition of cultural values (M = 1.48), linkages (M = 1.88), and preservation of
tradition and customs (M = 1.64) imply a rejection of negative cultural assertions, demonstrating that
respondents persist in valuing, acknowledging, and sustaining their cultural identity. Although the cultural loss
score is moderately high (M = 2.46), reflecting some recognition of cultural decline, the overall results indicate
a community that is committed to valuing and safeguarding its Indigenous heritage. Conversely, the low mean
of overall nature relatedness (M = 1.46) signifies a strong alignment with nature-connected behaviors and
perspectives, demonstrating enduring ecological consciousness and affiliation.
Indigenous cultures across various contexts demonstrate a profound connection between cultural identity and
nature-relatedness. Niigaaniin and MacNeill (2022) found that Indigenous Anishinaabe communities in Canada
exhibit strong ecological connectedness, indicating that cultural revitalization and traditional governance
positively influence environmental engagement. Similarly, Menzies et al. (2024) emphasize that Indigenous
valuessuch as responsibility, respect, and reciprocity toward naturecan serve as guiding principles for more
equitable and effective environmental conservation. Brondízio et al. (2021) support this view by highlighting
the significance of Indigenous and local knowledge systems in addressing socio-environmental challenges
through conservation and environmental governance. While these cultural systems foster ecocentric worldviews,
Sockhill et al. (2022) assert that individuals with anthropocentric values may also demonstrate strong pro-
environmental behaviors, suggesting that cultural diversity does not preclude ecological concern.
However, Titaley and Watloly (2021) caution that both internal and external forces increasingly threaten
Indigenous cultural values, though communities often express a desire to restore and preserve their traditions.
Higgins (2022) further explains that climate change significantly impacts intangible Indigenous heritage by
disrupting traditional environments and forcing cultural adaptations, thereby endangering long-standing
ecological relationships.
Summary of Regression Analysis
This subsection explored the significant difference on cultural attitude and nature relatedness in terms of sex,
educational attainment, and age.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 230
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 2 Relationship Between Key Variables in Terms of the Demographic Factors
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
T
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.939
.286
3.282
.002
level of cultural attitude
.177
.128
.186
1.379
.177
Sex
-.284
.115
-.337
-2.471
.019
Educational Attainment
.054
.143
.060
.380
.706
Age
.432
.128
.531
3.378
.002
If p<0.05, reject the null hypothesis, while if p>=0.05, accept.
Table 2 shows the regression model analyzes, the predictive relationship between cultural attitude, sex,
educational achievement, and age concerning nature relatedness. The constant (B
= 0.939, p = 0.002) is statistically significant, signifying a baseline level of nature relatedness when all predictors
are set to zero. Among the predictors, age = 0.432, p = 0.002) exhibits the most robust and statistically
significant positive influence on nature relatedness, indicating that older persons are more inclined to experience
a connection to nature. Similarly, sex = - 0.284, p = 0.019) serves as a significant predictor, suggesting that
females generally report greater degrees of nature relatedness than males, as evidenced by the negative
coefficient.
Conversely, the cultural attitude (β = 0.177, p = 0.177) and educational attainment (β = 0.054, p = 0.706) levels
are not statistically significant, indicating they lack a substantial predictive impact on nature relatedness in this
model. This corresponds with earlier research indicating that although cultural values may be conceptually
linked to environmental behaviors, they may not directly affect an individual's personal connection to nature,
particularly when other demographic factors such as age and gender exert more significant influence. The results
indicate that age and gender exert greater influence than cultural or educational factors on nature-relatedness
within this specific Indigenous community.
The influence of age and gender on nature relatedness is well supported by existing literature. De Sousa et
al. (2024) found that older adults tend to have a stronger connection to nature, which contributes positively to
their well-being and overall quality of life. This aligns with Lee and Burns (2022), who attribute older adults'
preference for natural environments to early-life exposure to nature, particularly through intergenerational
experiences.
Regarding gender, multiple studies confirm that women generally exhibit higher levels of nature relatedness
than men. Grabowska-Chenczke et al. (2022) reported that females demonstrate greater psychological well-
being associated with their connection to nature, while Davidov et al. (2023) supported this finding with
physiological evidence, showing that females score higher on the Environmental Identity Index and exhibit
stronger neurological responses to natural stimuli.
On the other hand, educational attainment appears to have limited predictive power in determining one’s nature
relatedness. Agatha et al. (2024) found no significant relationship between education level and environmental
behavior among university students, while Barragan‐Jason et al. (2021) confirmed through meta-analysis that
humannature connectedness is not necessarily driven by educational background. These studies reinforce the
present findings, which show that age and gender significantly influence nature relatedness, whereas cultural
attitude and education do not exert substantial predictive effects within the studied Indigenous community.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 231
www.rsisinternational.org
Summary of Correlational Analysis
This subsection explored the significant relationship between the respondents’ cultural attitude and nature
relatedness
Table 3: Relationship Between Variables
Table 3 indicates very low positive association between cultural attitude and natural relatedness among
Indigenous People Polillo, Quezon, as evidenced by a Pearson r value of 0.12. This is a marginal upward
tendency, implying that those with more favorable cultural attitudes may also exhibit greater nature relatedness;
nonetheless, the correlation is exceedingly weak. The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.01) suggests that
merely 1% of the variance in nature relatedness is attributable to cultural attitude, suggesting that cultural attitude
possesses negligible predictive value regarding individuals' feelings of connection to nature.
Furthermore, the p-value of 0.452 considerably exceeds the widely recognized threshold of 0.05, signifying that
the observed association lacks statistical significance. This indicates that the correlation may result from random
fluctuations in the data rather than a genuine association within the population. Although theoretical assumptions
suggest that cultural values, particularly in Indigenous societies, are closely linked to the natural world, the
findings of this study do not indicate a statistically significant relationship between cultural attitudes and nature
relatedness in this particular setting.
Various reasons may elucidate this outcome. Cultural identity may be diminishing or becoming increasingly
fractured due to external factors such as modernization, migration, or restricted cultural transmission across
generations. Although individuals may preserve specific cultural values, these do not inherently foster a robust
ecological awareness or sense of environmental responsibility. The nature-relatedness of respondents may be
affected by characteristics such as education, exposure to environmental initiatives, economic pressures, or
religious beliefs that were not addressed in this study.
Association between cultural attitude and nature relatedness observed in this study is consistent with emerging
literature that highlights the complexity and evolving nature of cultural identity in a globalized world.
Nedashkivska et al. (2024) and Canaza-Choque (2022) emphasize that globalization, migration, and digital
media are transforming traditional cultural identities, often leading to fragmented or hybrid forms that may dilute
the coherence of cultural values, including those linked to environmental worldviews. Kerubo (2024) also notes
that the homogenizing effects of globalization can erode localized cultural practices, weakening the assumed
link between Indigenous cultural attitudes and ecological connection.
Furthermore, while cultural frameworks may conceptually support pro-environmental behavior, Mavisakalyan
et al. (2023) found that individualistic cultural values can lead to greater environmental action but are not
necessarily tied to deeper emotional or subjective well- being derived from nature. This supports the idea that
behavior and emotional nature- relatedness may not always align. Toigo et al. (2022) further argue that personal
and contextual factors, rather than broad cultural or transcendental values, more directly shape ecological
behaviors.
CONCLUSION
This study examined the correlation between cultural views and nature relatedness among Indigenous People in
Polillo, Quezon. The findings affirmed a robust cultural identity and profound ecological awareness throughout
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 232
www.rsisinternational.org
the community; yet, statistical analysis indicated that cultural attitude did not significantly predict nature
relatedness, with age and gender proving to be more influential determinants. The results indicate that while
cultural values are conceptually linked to environmental behavior, they may not immediately correlate with a
quantifiable sense of nature connectedness. The study's limitations stem from its dependence on negatively
phrased items and its concentration on a particular Indigenous population, potentially impacting the
generalizability of the findings. Nevertheless, the results corroborate the Self-Determination Theory (Deci &
Ryan, 1985), highlighting the significance of intrinsic motivation and cultural identity in behavior, and validate
the Biophilia Hypothesis (Wilson, 1984), which asserts an innate human propensity to engage with naturean
inclination that persists among the respondents regardless of demographic and cultural differences.
Based on the findings and conclusions of this study, the following recommendations are proposed:
1. Facilitate intergenerational learning by urging elders to impart traditional ecological knowledge to future
generations, so enhancing their connection to nature.
2. Implement gender-sensitive strategies, as gender affects natural connectivity, and customize programs to
promote and enrich gender-specific interactions with nature.
3. Incorporate culture into environmental education by strengthening cultural identity through nature-based
learning grounded in Indigenous traditions and values.
4. Incorporate culture into environmental education by strengthening cultural identity through nature-based
learning grounded in Indigenous traditions and values.
5. Incorporate culture into environmental education by enhancing cultural identity through nature-based
learning grounded in Indigenous traditions and values.
6. Formulate Culturally-Informed Policies with Local Government Units (LGUs) to facilitate the preservation
of cultural and environmental heritage by enacting measures that safeguard Indigenous traditions and foster
ecological consciousness in educational institutions and communities.
Authors’ Contributions
Author 4 provided overall supervision of the study as the research adviser, while Authors 1, 2, and 3 were
primarily responsible for writing the original draft, revising the manuscript, collecting data, and securing funding
for the research. All remaining tasks including conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data analysis,
and interpretation of resultswere collaboratively undertaken by all authors. All authors have read and approved
the final version of the manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers would like to express their sincere gratitude to Southern Luzon State University; Office of
Research and Services; Dr. Rosdy N. Lazaro; Karizza May J. Mercado; Ronald T. Umali; and Denise Kristine
S. Ong for their support and encouragement in participating in this endeavor, and for helping us recognize the
opportunity to present on an international stage. Their invaluable guidance and support greatly contributed to
the completion of this study.
REFERENCES
1. Abas, A., Aziz, A., & Awang, A. (2022). A Systematic review on the local wisdom of Indigenous
peoplein nature conservation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063415
2. Absolor, J. L., Batara, O., Garcia, M. T. T., Morla, E. L., Carino, C. M., & Orpia, C. B. (2023). Cultural
Practices of the Indigenous Peoples (IPS) of San Emilio Ilocos Sur: Then and now. International Journal
of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VII(VII), 430448.
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.70732
3. Agatha, J. T. R., Kefi, A. I., Gultom, T. A., Antasya, J. D., Witjaksono, R. N., & Adiwena, B.Y. (2024).
Hubungan Nature Relatedness dan Perilaku Membuang Sampah Sembarangan oleh Mahasiswa. Suksma
Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 5(2), 123130. https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v5i2.5878
4. Agustina, E. T., Wahyudin, A. Y., & Pratiwi, A. A. (2021). The Students’ Motivation and Academic
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 233
www.rsisinternational.org
Achievement at Tertiary Level: A Correlational study. Journal of Arts and Education, 1(1).
https://doi.org/10.33365/jae.v1i1.33
5. Barragan‐Jason, G., De Mazancourt, C., Parmesan, C., Singer, M. C., & Loreau, M. (2021). Human
nature connectedness as a pathway to sustainability: A global meta‐analysis. Conservation Letters, 15(1).
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12852
6. Brondízio, E. S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Ferrari, M.
F., Galvin, K., Reyes-García, V., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Samakov, A., & Shrestha, U. B. (2021).
Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: indigenous and local knowledge, values,
and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 481509.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127
7. Canaza-Choque, F. A. (2022). En la era del desgarramiento: Tensión y retransformación de la identidad
cultural en los dominios de la globalización. La Vida & La Historia, 8(2), 4754.
https://doi.org/10.33326/26176041.2021.2.1333
8. Chakraborty, S., & Sadachar, A. (2022). Can a connection with the indigenous cultural values encourage
sustainable apparel consumption? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 27(1), 8099.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-07-2021-0191
9. Davidov, A., Razumnikova, O., & Bakaev, M. (2023). Nature in the heart and mind of the beholder:
Psycho-Emotional and EEG differences in perception of virtual nature due to gender. Vision, 7(2), 30.
https://doi.org/10.3390/vision7020030
10. De Sousa Sá, F. A., Osório, N. B., Neto, L. S. S., Santana, L. S. B., Filho, F. a. N., Oliveira, N.P. B., De
Oliveira Brito, M. S., De Sousa Almeida, F., & Alves, A. K. S. (2024). The Relationship Between Elderly
People And Nature: Impacts Of Traditional Knowledge On Promoting Well-Being And Quality
Of Life. Aracê., 6(3). https://doi.org/10.56238/arev6n3006
11. Dehong, S. (2024). Value Recognition: The international communication of shared human values and
aesthetics: A case study of the overseas dissemination and reception of Chinese literature. Social
Sciences in China, 45(3), 130143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2024.2403268
12. Franca, N. G. C., & Lumogdang, N. L. P. (2022). Profiling On Cultural Preservation Of The Blaan Tribe
Of Kiblawan, Davao Del Sur, Philippines. EPRA International Journal of Agriculture and Rural
Economic Research, 2530. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra10613
13. Grabowska-Chenczke, O., Wajchman-Świtalska, S., & Woźniak, M. (2022). Psychological Well-Being
and Nature Relatedness. Forests, 13(7), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071048
14. Higgins, N. (2022a). Changing Climate; Changing LifeClimate change and indigenous intangible
cultural heritage. Laws, 11(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11030047
15. Highfield, C., & Webber, M. (2021). Mana Ūkaipō: Māori Student Connection, Belonging and
engagement at school. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 145164.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00226-z
16. Huynh, L. T. M., Gasparatos, A., Su, J., Lam, R. D., Grant, E. I., & Fukushi, K. (2022a). Linking the
nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem
services. Science Advances, 8(31). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn8042
17. Keaulana, S., Kahili-Heede, M., Riley, L., Park, M. L. N., Makua, K. L., Vegas, J. K., & Antonio, M. C.
K. (2021b). A scoping review of nature, land, and
18. environmental connectedness and relatedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 18(11), 5897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115897
19. Kerubo, C. (2024). The impact of globalization on cultural identity. International Journal of Philosophy,
3(4), 5872. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2097
20. Lee, J., & Burns, R. C. (2022). Older adults’ preferences for natural environment and rural life:
Intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and
Tourism, 39, 100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100556
21. Lugo-Espinosa, G., Acevedo-Ortiz, M. A., Aquino-Bolaños, T., Ortiz-Hernández, Y. D., Ortiz-
Hernández, F. E., Pérez-Pacheco, R., & López-Cruz, J. Y. (2024).
22. Cultural Heritage, Migration, and Land Use transformation in San José Chiltepec, Oaxaca. Land, 13(10),
1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101658
23. Luza, J. G. (2023). Conceptualizing Indigenous Identity: Negotiation of internal and external factors for
indigenization. International Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis, 06(06).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Sociology
Page 234
www.rsisinternational.org
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i6-30
24. Mavisakalyan, A., Sharma, S., & Weber, C. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-
being: Culture has a role to play. Ecological Economics, 217, 108081.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108081
25. Menzies, A. K., Bowles, E., McGregor, D., Ford, A. T., & Popp, J. N. (2024). Sharing Indigenous values,
practices and priorities as guidance for transforming human environment relationships. People and
Nature, 6(5), 21092125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10707
26. Nedashkivska, T., Zarichanskyi, O., Pugachov, V., Shostak, V., & Stoliarchuk, N. (2024). Analysis of
cultural and identity transformations in the modern world. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(10), 2024244.
https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024244
27. Nicholas, G. (2021). Protecting Indigenous heritage objects, places, and values: challenges, responses,
and responsibilities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(3), 400422.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2009539
28. Niigaaniin, M., & MacNeill, T. (2022). Indigenous Culture and Nature Relatedness: Results from a
Community-Led Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4105338
29. Paing, J. N., Van Bussel, L. G., Gomez, R. A., & Hein, L. G. (2022). Ecosystem services through the
lens of indigenous people in the highlands of Cordillera Region, Northern Philippines. Journal of
Environmental Management, 308, 114597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114597
30. Pudjiastuti, S. R., Hadi, N., Arfani, H., Akbar, R. P., & Tajudin, A. S. (2021). The Culture and Local
Wisdom Of The Indigenous People Kasepuhan Sinar Resmi. Jhss (Journal of Humanities and Social
Studies), 5(2), 198202. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v5i2.4067
31. Schultz, M., Jamieson, H., Piontek, E., Coon, J. J., & Halsey, S. J. (2022). The Importance of Cultural
Values
32. in Ecological Restorations: A Systematic review. Society & Natural Resources, 35(9), 10211039.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2073625
33. Sockhill, N. J., Dean, A. J., Oh, R. R. Y., & Fuller, R. A. (2022). Beyond the ecocentric: Diverse values
and attitudes influence engagement in pro‐environmental behaviours. People and Nature, 4(6), 1500
1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10400
34. Sumitro, S., Jumadi, J., Idrus, I. I., & Kamaruddin, S. A. (2024). The existence of the Indigenous people
of Cek Bocek in Lawin Village, Sumbawa. Socio-economic and Humanistic Aspects for Township and
Industry., 2(4), 504516. https://doi.org/10.59535/sehati.v2i4.337
35. Tanalgo, K. C., Plang, Y., Cruz, K. C. D., Rubio, M. M., Hilario‐Husain, B. A., Respicio, J. M. V.,
Lidasan, A. K., Abdullah, S. S., Fabrero, G. V. N., Ele, R. J. A., Murray, S. A., Saliling, Y. V.,
Macatabon, R. A., Casim, L. F., Reyes, J. D., & Agduma, A. R. (2025). Diversity and ecological factors
influencing medicinal plant use among ethnolinguistic groups in the Philippines. Integrative
Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.70011
36. Tassell-Matamua, N., Lindsay, N., Bennett, A., & Masters-Awatere, B. (2020). Māori cultural identity
linked to greater regard for nature: attitudes and (Less so) behavior. Ecopsychology, 13(1), 918.
https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2020.0027
37. Titaley, E., & Watloly, A. (2021a). The Cultural Values Of The Island’s Indigenous People.
Sosiohumaniora, 23(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v23i3.28235
38. Toigo, C. H., Ravenscroft, N., & De Mattos, E. J. (2022). The role of contextual values in the formation
of ecological behaviours. Environmental Values, 32(4), 385
409.https://doi.org/10.3197/096327122x16611552268690