Page 230
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
Gen Y vs Gen Z: Generational Differences in English Slang Types
and Perceived Use of Slang on Social Media
Noor Amanina Mohammed.,
*
Elia Md Johar., Faizah Mohamad., Zaemah Abd Kadir
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.922ILEIID0024
Received: 22 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 22 October 2025
This study explored the slang usage of Generation Y and Generation Z, focusing on slang types and the
perceived use of English slang on social media, and examined the significant mean difference in slang usage
between the two generations. It employed a causal-comparative design to compare the generational differences
between Generation Y and Generation Z, utilizing central tendency and independent sample t-test methods. A
convenience sampling method was used to select employees to represent the two groups from one private
company. The findings indicate that Initialism is the most prevalent slang type among both Gen Y and Gen Z,
with Gen Y showing broader engagement in nuanced forms and Gen Z favouring concise expressions.
Perceptions of slang use were generally positive, with Gen Z viewing it as a more effective and socially
empowering communicative tool than Gen Y. These results highlight a clear generational gap in both usage
patterns and attitudes toward English slang in digital contexts. The study advances insights into generational
language practices in online communication on slang to enhance engagement, identity expression, and social
connection in digital environments.
Keywords: slang types, perceived use, generational difference, Gen Y, Gen Z
INTRODUCTION
Background
In the rapidly evolving communication landscape, social media has become a crucial platform where
Generation Y (Gen Y) and Generation Z (Gen Z) express themselves, gain connections, and create linguistic
trends. Born as digital natives, Gen Y (1981-1996) and Gen Z (1997-2012) (Giancaterino, 2023) have mainly
used TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, WhatsApp, and Facebook as communication platforms (Rezeki & Sagala,
2019). Their pattern of social media use differs, but in subtle ways. While Gen Y often engages more with
Facebook and LinkedIn for networking and information sharing, Gen Z prefers fast‑paced, visually stimulating
platforms such as TikTok and Instagram (Pew Research Center, 2023). These, among others, define their
preferences and differences in terms of technological familiarity and distinct social priorities
The informal and fluid nature of online communication facilitates dynamic language practices, including the
emergence of slang among social media users. Social media users, particularly young adults and adolescents,
often use informal language or slang in casual or informal communication (Rusfandi, 2020). They intentionally
use slang to break the seriousness of the conversation and foster congeniality between them. The use of this
informal language, or slang, enables the implementation of social functions like instilling humour, fostering
closeness between users, easier social interaction, and creating relaxed communication atmospheres (Budiasa
et al., 2021; Haris et al., 2023; Josea et al., 2025). Slang therefore, can serve as a bridge between individual
expression and collective culture (Josea et al., 2025).
Problem Statement
Being overexposed to social media may lead to a significant influence from the content displayed, the language
Page 231
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
used, or the communication within the platforms. Budiasa et al. (2021) state that the frequent use of slang on
social media may negatively impact users' formal communication skills, academic writing abilities, and create
intergenerational communication barriers. This is because the informal nature of social media, according to
Ogheneakpobor (2023) encourages a relaxed approach to grammar, spelling, and punctuation, resulting in
linguistic evolution and confusion with traditional norms. The use of slang may also exclude those unfamiliar
with its meanings, especially across generations. The rapid spread of slang through social media accelerates
language change, making it both a unifying and divisive force in digital discourse.
Besides, communicating in an informal social atmosphere has brought negative impacts on language
development. Since younger generations habitually refresh social media feeds, they become more creative and
relentlessly create new ideas. Saputra and Marlina (2019) argue that, due to their creativity, especially in using
language, they tend to ignore language structure, and a new style of language, known as slang, was created. As
English slang is not a standardised and structured language, overusing it may ruin their grammar and linguistic
skills, such as listening, reading, speaking, and writing, especially when the English language is not their first
language. For instance, language learners tend to use slang in the academic writing context and thus can
confuse the readers’ understanding of their writing content (González & Chang, 2024; Gusnayetti, 2021).
To exacerbate the situation, Rezeki and Sagala (2019) found that Gen Y may not significantly improve their
language skills in the future due to their habit of using slang rather than standard language. It was also found
that the younger generation spoke the standard English language less slowly, which potentially threatens to
replace the standard language with slang (Hendrajati et al., 2023; Sardiyah, 2020; Za et al., 2023). These can
lead to a lower language attitude toward the use of standard English.
For people who are not familiar with the slang, it can be a challenge to understand it, as English slang is not
standard English. A qualitative study by Olobia (2024) found that using English slang, such as abbreviations
and acronyms, led to issues in word manipulation and sentence distortion. Those unfamiliar with slang,
especially second-language speakers, are likely to make mistakes in interpreting and using English slang.
Many previous studies have specifically focused on either Gen Y (Hendrajati et al., 2023; Pongsapan, 2022;
Rezeki & Sagala, 2019; Rusfandi, 2020; Sardiyah, 2020) or Generation Z (Budiasa et al., 2021; Padohinog et
al., 2020; Za et al., 2023). Most of the time, the sampled population was from school or university students.
Comparative studies investigating slang usage within generational differences were limited. This research gap
is substantiated by Vacalares et al. (2023), who suggest further research to explore linguistic patterns and
impacts of slang, taking into consideration perceptions of Gen Y and Generation Z. Furthermore, this
comparative research has been understudied in the local setting.
As highlighted in the above studies, conducted in Indonesia (Budiasa et al., 2021; Hendrajati et al., 2023;
Pongsapan, 2022; Rezeki & Sagala, 2019; Rusfandi, 2020; Sardiyah, 2020; Za et al., 2023), the methods
employed were either qualitative or quantitative. Thus, the study employed a combination of both approaches
to determine the perceptions of Gen Y and Generation Z regarding the use of English slang in social media
communication within the Malaysian context, specifically among employees from a private company in Kuala
Lumpur. This study aimed at addressing the following research questions:
(a) What is the most frequently used slang type by Gen Y and Gen Z?
(b) What are Gen Y’s and Gen Zs perceptions of the use of English slang in communication on social
media, and
(c) Is there a significant mean difference in the perceived use of slang between Gen Y and Gen Z?
Thus, understanding how Gen Y and Gen Z differ in their perceptions and uses of slang is essential. This study
addressed that gap by providing empirical evidence that can guide balanced approaches to language use in
Malaysia’s evolving digital communication landscape.
Page 232
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
LITERATURE REVIEW
Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT)
CAT was developed by sociolinguist Howard Giles (1973) to comprehend and understand the reasons why
people shift the way they talk, including the languages, accents, and dialects, when communicating with
others. Giles analyzed the speech variability used by the addressee, which results in the shift of speech style
through interpersonal and intergroup accommodation processes, regardless of the interaction context. He also
considered the receiver characteristics as a factor influencing the communication adjustment of the speakers.
The theory has been applied in communication to include intergroup interactions between different social
groups such as cultures, generations, genders, and professions, and within and between organizations, either
through physical interactions or via various media in varying countries and by researchers with different
cultural and language backgrounds (Giles & Ogay, 2007).
According to Giles (1973), there are three conceptualized adjustments: convergence, divergence, and
maintenance. This study focused only on two types of adjustments, which are convergence and divergence.
Convergence is the first form of speech accommodation where people modify their communication style when
interacting with others as a strategy to enhance similarities between them (Zhang & Giles, 2018). To simplify,
a party makes their speech more similar to that of the other party, either by switching the language, adopting a
different speaking style, or adjusting their accent. This type of adjustment is usually perceived as a sign of
liking by trying to fit and be as similar as possible to the other party (Giles, 1973). This behaviour is perceived
positively as it shows the motives for respect and friendliness. Usually, people make this adjustment to seek
approval, affiliation, and to instill interpersonal similarity, thereby reducing social distance (Soliz & Giles,
2014). It also improves the effectiveness of communication as it highlights mutual understanding and lowers
uncertainty (Gudykunst, 1995).
Divergence is a communication strategy where the speakers emphasize the differences in their speech patterns
and accentuate the language differences between themselves and others. In other words, one party
distinguishes itself from the other by emphasizing its language, speaking style, or accent. When using
divergence as the adjustment of communication, people will assume the motive of the party as disliking the
other group, as it perceives the motive negatively, as they want to be as distinctive from the other party. The
adjustment of divergence leads to emphasising the speech and nonverbal differences between a party and the
other party to express contrasting group identities (Soliz & Giles, 2014). People adopt this type of
communication to preserve their pride in their social identity.
The study employed the theory as it discusses the association of language use, specifically English slang, and
communication in social contexts, particularly on social media. The use of English slang on social media may
be influenced by one’s social circle or environment, such as their interactions with people of the same age,
which then impacts their linguistic trends and preferences. The exposure of the social context may influence
the way people communicate with one another. Therefore, this theory is very helpful in analysing and
exploring Gen Ys and Gen Zs perceptions of the use of English colloquialisms in communication on social
media.
Slang and Its Typologies
Lutfiah et al. (2024) refer slang as “non‑standard lexical items and expressions, typically ephemeral, that arise
within specific communities to convey shared identity, humor, or solidarity, and which frequently employ
processes such as clipping, blending, and semantic shift(p. 785) while Chumok and Lerdpaisalwong (2025)
define slang as “a dynamic, informal subset of language characterized by creativity, reduced formality, and
group-specific usage, often emerging in response to cultural trends and technological change” (p. 44). These
definitions highlight the role of slang as a social function (group identity) and the linguistic innovation of
online platforms, especially on social media.
Page 233
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
Slang typologies classify the ways slang terms are formed, offering a systematic framework for analyzing
informal language. Foundational work on word‑formation processes by Hans Marchand (1969) and Laurie
Bauer (1983) has been widely applied in sociolinguistics to categorize slang into types such as clipping,
initialism, acronym, blending, and compounding. Within this typology, clipping shortens a longer word
without altering its meaning, e.g., exam from examination or fridge from refrigerator. Initialism forms a term
from the first letters of a sequence of words, pronouncing each letter separately, as in LOL (“laugh out loud”)
or OMG (“oh my God”). Acronyms are similar but pronounced as words, such as YOLO (“you only live
once”) or NATO. Blending merges parts of two or more words into a new form, e.g., brunch (breakfast +
lunch) or smog (smoke + fog). Compounding joins two whole words to create a new term, such as hashtag or
keyboard.
Recent digital communication research shows that these processes are especially common in online slang,
where brevity, creativity, and group identity are valued. Clipping and initialism often serve efficiency, while
blending and compounding can be more playful or expressive. By identifying which types dominate in Gen Y
and Gen Z discourse, the study would reveal each linguistic preference. This study adopted the Marchand
Bauer typology because it provides a linguistically rigorous way to categorise Gen Y and Gen Z slang on social
media, enabling both quantitative frequency analysis and qualitative interpretation of cultural trends. The
study’s focused typology (clipping, initialism, blending, etc.) can be mapped onto CAT’s framework by
examining which slang types are used to converge with a group (e.g., adopting popular abbreviations to fit in)
and which are used to diverge (e.g., creating novel blends to stand out).
The Role of Social Media in the Younger Generations’ Lives:
Regularly scrolling social media has become a habit among younger generations, as they have realised its
importance in many aspects of their daily lives. Vacalares and Cagalawan (2023) state that the use of social
media by young people is increasing, influencing their daily lives and communication structure, and this has
been highlighted by Grau et al. (2019), who state that Gen Y and Gen Z spend most of their time online
socializing with other users.
Social media has often been used as a strategic medium for managing perceived self-identity deficiencies.
Dwivedi and Lewis (2021) reported that Gen Y used social media as a ‘mask’ or coping mechanism to
overcome their self-identity issues. They used them to escape from the reality of their personal life and
problems by socializing online with their friends (Grau et al., 2019). Gen Y and Gen Z, accustomed to
technological communication, tend to be more confident interacting online than face-to-face as they are more
familiar and comfortable with the digital platform (Li & Jing, 2018). Hence, their reliance on it is so great that
they find comfort when using it.
Previous Studies:
In sociolinguistic research, slang typologies (initialism, clipping, connotation, compounding, euphemism, and
spelling distortion) have been widely described (Eble, 1996; Allan & Burridge, 2006; Mattiello, 2008). Earlier
studies by Crystal (2011) and Tagliamonte and Denis (2008) linked the popularity of abbreviation‑based slang
to the speed and convenience of digital communication.
In recent years, more attention has been given to how different generations, for example, Gen Y and Gen Z,
use these forms online. For instance, Silalahi (2023) found that how Gen Z used slang was determined by
fast‑changing technology, particularly when they were on popular platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and
internet memes, where new slang emerges persistently. On the same note, Jeresano and Carretero (2022)
qualitatively reported that Gen Z’s linguistic style was closely tied to short‑form video culture, while Gen Y
tends to blend long‑established abbreviations with newer, trend‑driven slang. Notably, in their quantitative
study, Vacalares and Cagalawan (2023) found that although Gen Ys and Gen Z’s familiarity with many
internet slang terms, Gen Z was more adept at understanding creative spelling variations. These studies have so
far successfully mapped the slang usage patterns; however, the area where a direct comparison of how often
each slang type appears in Gen Y and Gen Z speech using both descriptive and inferential statistics was
Page 234
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
limited. Even less is known about which slang types are rarely used by either generation in online contexts.
Hence, this study addressed these gaps by analysing the frequency of slang use between Gen Y and Gen Z and
quantitatively investigating the most significant differences in the perceived use of English slang on social
media.
Many studies have demonstrated that both Gen Y and Gen Z had constructive perceptions towards slang on
social media (Budiasa et al., 2021; Padohinog et al., 2020; Pongsapan, 2022; Rusfandi, 2020). Exploring the
use of slang on Instagram, Rusfandi (2020) found that most participants thought positively of using Instagram
as a casual language learning resource. They agreed that they could practice and improve their vocabulary and
writing skills through communicating using slang on social media. Similarly, Padohinog et al. (2020) revealed
that the use of slang facilitates better communication for faster and easier message interchange. Prayudha and
Pradana (2023) corroborated this in their study as the participants felt that slang words have helped them
become trendier, making it easier to chat as they only use abbreviations, allowing them to become more
comfortable chatting with people who use the same slang. Furthermore, Budiasa et al. (2021) found that slang
serves as a mechanism to enrich new vocabulary, reduce the seriousness of conversation, and enhance
creativity in communication across various social functions. Thus, slang has helped them become more
engaged and more confident in the conversation, according to Jeresano and Carretero (2022).
However, the use of slang that deviates from the English standard can create barriers when interacting with
people outside the group or generation. A study by Neshkovska (2020) revealed that many English major
students in his research did not agree to include slang in their academic syllabus because it is not a standard
language. Another study by Rezeki and Sagala (2019) also presented similar findings. It was found that by
overusing slang, the young generation has ignored the standard language, which may lead to low proficiency.
Olobia (2024) and González and Chang (2024) address how the normalization of English slang usage can be
controversial when communicating with people from different age groups and cultural backgrounds.
Miscommunication may occur when this type of English variation is used with people who are not acquainted
with the slang.
METHOD
This research used a comparative-causal design to explore Gen Y’s and Gen Z’s perceptions towards the use of
English slang in establishing effective communication on social media, as well as to examine the significant
mean difference of their perceptions based on the generations. Quantitative data were collected via
questionnaires to address the research questions, which explored perceived usage and generational differences
in mean and standard deviation values.
The participants were selected using the convenience sampling method. The sampling method was employed
because the inclusion criteria included two generations Gen Y and Gen Z, who were the users of English
slang on social media. Only those aged 39 to 43 were included as participants to represent Gen Y, and those
aged 23 to 27 represented Generation Z. The restricted age of the participants was to ensure that the age gap is
still large between the two generations. Sampling involved a private company in Kuala Lumpur, and the
selected sample comprised the users of the chosen social media. The sample size was determined based on the
Raosoft sample size calculator. The sampled population was 84 employees of the private company who were
aged between 23 and 27 to represent Generation Z and 39 and 43 to represent Gen Y.
The study setting focused on social media, specifically concentrating on Instagram, X, Facebook, and TikTok.
The selection for these social media platforms was based on their popularity and the percentage of users from
Gen Y and Gen Z using the platforms in 2024 (Dixon, 2024a; Herd Digital, 2024). The 2024 statistics show
that Gen Y and Gen Z spent their time using these four social media platforms.
The research instruments used were an online questionnaire. The three sections in the 21-item questionnaires
were demographic information (Section A), types of English slang on social media (Section B with 7 items),
and perceptions towards the use of English slang on social media (Section C with 14 items). The study used 5-
point Likert scale questions. Section B used the rating from very frequently to never, while Section C used a
Page 235
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
rating that ranged from strongly agree to disagree. The questionnaire was adapted from previous research, from
Charkova (2007), Padohinog et al. (2020), and Jeresano and Carretero (2022) to address the research
objectives.
An ethics approval application was submitted to the Faculty Ethics Review Committee for the purpose of
gaining approval to conduct the study and to protect the rights of the respondents, which included anonymity
and confidentiality. The administration of the questionnaire was conducted via Gmail, WhatsApp, and
Telegram to reach the sampled population. The data collected were analysed using descriptive and
correlational analysis to address the research objectives. The study utilised the IBM Statistical Package for
Social Sciences (SPSS) for data analysis purposes to generate mean scores and standard deviation for the first
research objective, and to perform a t-test to examine the mean differences in the use of English slang in
communication between Gen Y and Gen Z.
To ensure the questionnaire's validity, face validity was assessed with selected participants to examine their
comprehension of the questionnaire items, including the language used in the questions, the format, and
readability (Aithal & Aithal, 2020). It was conducted to confirm that the questionnaire format and items were
appropriate and unambiguous. The Cronbach alpha value of the 7-item subscale on slang types was .867, and
for the 14-item subscale of the perceived use of slang was .868. The results indicated a very high internal
consistency for each subscale. The values indicate that the subscales (slang types and perceived use) were
measuring the underlying intended construct.
RESULTS AND ANALYSES
Demographic Profiles
The descriptive analysis of the respondents’ demographic profiles included gender, generation groups,
education levels, and their job designations as displayed in Table 1.
Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of Respondents’ Demographic Profiles in Frequency and Percentages
Page 236
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
Females accounted for 59.7%, while males represented 40.3% of the total. While 41.7% were Gen Y, aged
between 39 and 43, 58.3% were Gen Z, aged between 23 and 27 years old. Moreover, educational level
revealed that the majority (79.2%) had a bachelors degree, followed by 9.7% with a Diploma, 6.9% with a
master's degree, and 4.2% with a Malaysian Education Certificate or Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM).
Figure 1 shows that more than half were Executives (56.9%), followed by non-managerial staff (15.6%) and
Managers (12.5%). Smaller groups include Senior Executives (8.3%), Supervisors (4.2%), and Assistant Vice
President (1.4%). This indicates that most respondents work at the Executive level, with fewer in higher
managerial roles.
Figure 1 Distribution of Respondents’ Job Designations in Percentages
Research Question 1: What is the most frequently used slang type by Gen Y and Gen Z?
The research question addressed the types of slang used by Generations Y and Z. Figure 2 presents a summary
of the frequency of slang types used by both generations cumulatively, showing the overall picture of slang
type usage and preference across the generations diagrammatically.
Figure 2 Frequency of Types of Slang Usage among Gen Y and Gen Z
Figure 2 indicates that Clipping and Initialism were the most frequently used slang types in the surveyed
sample on social media for communication purposes. At the same time, Euphemism was recorded as a slang
Page 237
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
type that was never used on social media. The Connotation type was almost spread out evenly, as respondents
rated from never to very frequently, suggesting that this slang type was not a favourable one. Compounding
and Expression types had the highest ‘Never rating, with some respondents answering that they rarely and
occasionally used them. This indicates that these types were uncommonly used in their online communication.
In the meantime, Table 2 depicts a comparison of generational differences in slang type usage between Gen Y
and Gen Z using mean scores. Overall, the results indicated an overlap and a divergence in slang use between
generations. The analyses indicated in Figure 2 and Table 2 revealed similar findings.
Table 2 Comparison of Mean Scores of Generational Differences in the Slang Type Usage between Gen Y and
Gen Z
From the table, Initialism was the most used slang type by Gen Y and Gen Z. This was observed through a
small difference in the mean scores (Gen Y’s M = 4.33; Gen Z’s M = 4.30), followed by Clipping which was
occasionally used by both generations (Gen Y’s M = 3.67; Gen Zs M = 3.70). Spelling Distortion (Gen Y’s M
= 3.21; Gen Zs M = 2.30) recorded a .91 mean difference between Gen Y and Gen Z, demonstrating the
strongest generational difference. where Gen Z did not favour its use, but was occasionally used by Gen Y.
Interestingly, the Euphemism usage for Gen Y and Gen Z was almost similar, as the means scores for both
were 1.97 and 1.57, respectively. This slang type was unlikely to be favoured by them as it was rarely used.
In addition, it was found that Gen Y and Gen X had lower usage in Connotation, Compounding, and
Expression slang types, which were within the rarelyoccasionally range. This suggests that these slang types
were uncommon in their digital communication
Research Question 2: How do Gen Y and Gen Z perceive the use of English slang in communication on
social media?
To address the second research question above, the section reports the results of a pooled descriptive analysis
of the perceived use of English slang in digital communication using a composite mean and SD values across
the generations. Table 3 shows the composite mean scores and SD of 14 items without the generation category
since the overall mean scores for Gen Y’s and Gen Z’s perceived use of slang were calculated when
performing an independent t-test and were reported in Table 4.
From the table, Item 6 (M = 4.24, SD = 0.76) recorded the highest mean value, followed by Item 12 (M = 4.17,
SD = 0.73), and this finding revealed that English slang helped improve communication skills and helped fit in
the age group and get accepted by peers, respectively. In third place was Item 2 (M = 4.15, SD = 0.74), which
demonstrated that using slang with people on social media was appropriate. The high mean score of Item 11
(M = 4.14, SD = 0.78) indicated that using English slang made them look cool. Item 14 (M=4.13, SD=1.27)
and Item 13 (M=4.10, SD=1.31) reported the appropriateness of using slang in any context or situations.
Page 238
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
Table 3 Summary of Descriptive Analysis on Gen Y’s and Gen Z’s Perceptions of the use of English slang on
social media
Items 5 (M = 4.08, SD = 0.78) and 3 (M = 4.06, SD = 0.82) had similar mean scores, indicating that both
respondents agreed they could engage with people more confidently and be more engaged in communication
when using slang. Item 1 (M = 3.82, SD = 0.94) and Item 7 (M = 3.81, SD = 0.83) only have a 0.01 difference
in mean score, indicating that respondents were interested in using slang because of their friends, and it also
helped them improve their vocabulary, suggesting that English slang could help broaden their lexicons. Items 8
and 4 had mean scores below 4.0 (M = 3.74, SD = 0.75; M=3.24, SD=0.91, respectively), showing that the
respondents disagreed that English slang helped improve language fluency, but it did not hinder the users from
communicating on social media. Items 10 (M=3.11, SD=0.99) and 9 (M = 2.81, SD = 1.06) scored the lowest,
indicating that they were either neutral or sceptical about English slang influencing writing style positively,
and that they felt that slang was a helpful tool for spelling.
Research Question 3: Is there any significant mean difference in the use of English Slang on social media
across the generations?
To address the third research question, a t-test was run to examine the significant mean differences between
Gen Y and Generation Z’s perceptions on the use of English slang on social media, as shown in Tables 3 and
4.
Table 3 Analyses of Group Statistics of Independent Samples T-Test
Page 239
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
The preliminary analyses of group statistics of an independent samples t‑test revealed that Gen Z participants
(M = 3.93, SD = 0.51) scored slightly higher than Gen Y participants (M = 3.68, SD = 0.39) on perceptions of
English slang use, t(70) = 2.33, p = .023, d = 0.55. However, the difference was minimal (.35), indicating
both generations had a similar range of agreement toward the perceived use of slang. To determine whether the
mean difference in the perceived use of slang by Gen Y and Gen Z was significant, the subsequent results of
the independent samples t-test were presented below in Table 4.
Table 4 Analyses of Group Statistics of Independent Samples T-Test
In Table 4, a Levene’s Test significance value of 0.015 signifies the assumption of equal variances was
violated (p < .05). An independent samples t-test showed that Gen Z respondents (M = 3.93, SD = 0.51) scored
significantly higher than Gen Y respondents (M = 3.68, SD = 0.51) on perceptions of slang use, t (70) =-2.37,
p=0.02. A p-value <0.05 can be concluded as ‘significantly different’ (Boscardin et al., 2024). In other words,
there was a significant mean difference in the perceived use of slang between Gen Y and Gen Z. This
significant difference suggests that Gen Z perceived slang as more positive and effective for communication
compared to Gen Y. This indicates that Gen Z reported significantly higher agreement with the use of English
slang than Gen Y, with a moderate effect size that the generational gap in perceptions was meaningful.
DISCUSSION
The study revealed interesting findings of slang types of usage and the perception of slang use. The results
confirm earlier observations (Mattiello, 2008; Silalahi, 2023) that initialism and clipping dominate across
generations, reflecting efficiency-driven communication norms. The near-identical mean scores for initialism
align with Vacalares and Cagalawan’s (2023) finding of shared comprehension for abbreviation-based slang.
However, the higher spelling distortion usage among Gen Y contrary to claims by Jeresano and Carretero
(2022) that Gen Z favoured playful orthography, may indicate a shift toward multimodal expression (GIFs,
emojis, short-form video) among Gen Z. These findings contribute to the literature by quantifying both
convergence and divergence in slang usage. The result also complemented the frequency analysis in this study:
while both generations favoured certain slang types (e.g., initialism, clipping), Gen Z were more positive
which may encourage broader and more confident use across contexts. This suggests that attitudes toward
slang are not merely a reflection of usage patterns but may actively shape them, reinforcing generational
differences in linguistic behaviour.
The findings showed that both Gen Y and Gen Z had positive perceptions of the use of English slang on social
media, but Gen Z favoured using slang. Notably, they used slang to connect with their friends to feel included
in their age groups. Slang is mainly used by the same age group as a secret code or the ‘inside jokes’ within the
specific community. This corroborates Giles' proposition (1973), which is that people adjust their language to
match the group they’re talking to. Padohinog et al. (2020) in their study revealed that slang helped build a
sense of belonging, even across age groups, provided that there was some effort to understand each other.
Furthermore, these findings align with earlier research showing that Gen Z tends to view slang as a natural and
effective component of digital communication (Jeresano & Carretero, 2022; Silalahi, 2023). Their higher
Page 240
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
scores may reflect greater immersion in online environments where slang is not only common but also
functions as a marker of in‑group identity and cultural fluency. In contrast, Gen Y’s slightly lower agreement
could indicate a more selective or context‑dependent acceptance of slang, consistent with studies noting Gen
Y’s tendency to balance informal and formal registers (Vacalares & Cagalawan, 2023).
Next, it was also found that slang contributed to a more relaxed and natural tone in conversations. This finding
aligns with previous research suggesting that slang enhances conversational ease and informality (Li & Jing,
2018; Lutviana & Mafulah, 2021). Being able to switch between slang and more formal language depending
on the situation seemed to help communication flow better (Jeresano & Carretero, 2022). Still, there’s
awareness that slang can sometimes cause misunderstandings between age groups (Dwivedi & Lewis, 2021) or
carry negative or inappropriate meanings (Karimah, 2021; Rezeki & Sagala, 2019). Most agreed that it’s best
kept for informal settings, maintaining a clear distinction between casual and formal use (Padohinog et al.,
2020).
Other research (Hendrajati et al., 2023; Pongsapan, 2022; Rusfandi, 2020) has suggested slang could boost
informal fluency and vocabulary, but it was not by everyone as instrumental for language development, as
reported by Jeresano and Carretero (2022). The patterns in participants’ responses suggest some uncertainty
about whether English slang genuinely supports the development of formal writing skills, particularly in areas
like style and spelling. This reflects earlier concerns in the literature that while slang can enrich informal
expression, it may not always transfer positively to academic or professional contexts (Hendrajati et al., 2023;
Vacalares & Cagalawan, 2023).
At the same time, generational differences in attitudes highlight the impact of social and digital environments
on language perceptions. Younger participants, who are more immersed in online spaces where slang is
common, appeared more open to embracing it as part of their everyday communication. This reinforces the
idea that attitudes toward slang are shaped not only by linguistic norms but also by identity, community
belonging, and the communicative habits of different age groups (Pedro, 2022; Pongsapan, 2022).
CONCLUSION
This causal-comparative study explored generational differences in slang type usage and the perceived use of
English slang on social media, with a special focus on Gen Y and Gen Z. It mainly examined the most
frequently used slang types, the perceptions of slang use across generations, and whether meaningful
differences exist between the two cohorts. The findings of this study successfully addressed all three research
questions, offering clear insights into generational slang usage, perceptions, and differences in online
communication.
Descriptive analyses of the types of slang usage revealed that Initialism is the most frequently or commonly
used slang type among both Gen Y and Gen Z, while Clipping was moderately used. Spelling Distortion
showed the greatest generational divide, with Gen Z showing notably less preference. Euphemism,
Connotation, Compounding, and Expression were infrequently used by both groups, suggesting these forms
are less relevant in their online interactions. Overall, Gen Y demonstrates broader engagement with nuanced
and indirect slang forms, whereas Gen Z leans marginally toward concise, shortened forms. These patterns
may reflect differences in digital environments, communication norms, and the linguistic affordances of the
platforms each generation uses most.
Descriptive analyses of the perceived use of English slang on social media uncovered several key insights.
First, slang is widely endorsed as having communicative and social benefits because it enhances
communication skills, helps individuals fit in with their age group, and fosters peer acceptance. Second, slang
is deemed appropriate for social media interactions and as a marker of social appeal, boosting users
confidence in using slang across diverse contexts. Thus, slang is not only functional but also socially strategic,
contributing to both linguistic effectiveness and identity construction
Page 241
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
Inferential analysis of the generational differences in the use of slang revealed that Gen Z participants
expressed a more favourable perception of its use than those of Gen Y, even though both generations engage
with English slang in social media communication. Hence, it concludes that slang, to Gen Z, serves as a more
effective and positive communicative tool compared to Gen Y. It was sufficient to state that there is a
generational gap in how slang is perceived and valued in digital contexts. Overall, the study underscores the
evolving nature of language in online spaces and highlights the importance of considering generational
perspectives when analyzing linguistic trends in social media communication.
These findings carry several implications that highlight the practical applications and relevance of these
research findings. The use of English slang could become a valuable tool in boosting engagement and
confidence among employees in their social media interactions. Organizations may find that encouraging the
use of slang can make digital communications engaging and livelier. Next, communication training programs
or workshops incorporating contemporary slang usage should be organized to improve employees'
communication skills, vocabulary, and language fluency, ultimately leading to better overall communication
within the organization. Furthermore, encouraging the use of slang may help create a more inclusive and
cohesive work environment. Employees who feel cool and accepted by their peers when using slang are likely
to experience better social integration and teamwork. Organizations may need to develop communication
strategies that cater to the preferences of different generations. This would ensure that both younger and older
employees feel comfortable and confident in their use of language on social media.
For future investigations, it is suggested to include a wider range of generations to compare, such as Baby
Boomers and Generation Alpha. The additional generations may help in exploring a wider generational
contrast in English slang perception. Another improvement that can be done for further research is to explore
the differences in English slang used by social media users based on specific platform slang. As this study
generalizes the English slang used via four platforms, which are Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok, future
research could focus on how slang differs across these platforms, as different social media platforms may
contain different English slang trends.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah
Alam for their invaluable support to the completion of this article.
REFERENCES
1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge
University Press.
2. Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge University Press.
3. Budiasa, I. G., Weddha Savitri, P., & Shanti Sari Dewi, A. A. Sg. (2021). Penggunaan bahasa slang di media
sosial. Humanis, 25(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2021.v25.i02.p08
4. Charkova, K.D. (2007). A language without borders: English slang and Bulgarian learners of English.
Language Learning, 57(3), 369-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00420.x
5. Chumok, T., & Lerdpaisalwong, P. (2025). Creative language of English internet slang on Twitter. Journal
of Language and Culture, 44(1), 4360. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLC/article/view
6. Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student's guide. Routledge.
7. Dixon, S. J. (2024, May 2). Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of April 2024, by age group.
Statista.
8. Dwivedi, A., & Lewis, C. (2021). How millennials’ life concerns shape social media behaviour. Behaviour
and Information Technology, 40(14), 14671484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1760938
9. Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students. University of North
Carolina Press. Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility:A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15,
87105.
10. Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility:A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87105.
Page 242
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
11. Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. In explaining communication
contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
12. Giancaterino, C. (2023). Gen Z vs. Millennials: How to target both audiences. Five CRM.
https://www.fivecrm.com/blog/marketing-to-gen-z-vs-millennials/
13. González, V. P. V., & Chang, Y. H. (2024). Social media as a hindrance to the writing skills of English
learners. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(1), 1205612069.
https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i3.11322
14. Grau, S., Kleiser, S., & Bright, L. (2019). Exploring social media addiction among millennial students.
Qualitative Market Research, 22(2), 200216. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2017-0058
15. Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management theory: Current status. In R. Wiseman (Ed.),
Intercultural communication (pp. 858). Sage.
16. Gusnayetti. (2021). The impact of slang among youth on Indonesian language. Encyclopedia Social Review,
3(3), 275281.
17. Hendrajati, E., Zahrok, S., Subali, E., Agustin, D. S. Y., & Wahyuddin, W. (2023). The impact of slang
usage on Indonesian from a sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Development Research, 7(1), 104109.
https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v7i1.302
18. Herd Digital. (2024). Facebook statistics you must know in 2024. Herd.Digital.
19. Jeresano, M., & Carretero, M. (2022). TikTok talk: Platform-specific slang and generational identity. United
International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(4), 1125.
20. Karimah, S. A. (2021). English used on social media among Indonesian netizens: Sociolinguistics approach.
Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Riset Sosiologi, 2(2), 115128. https://doi.org/10.47776/mjprs.002.02.02
21. Li, M., & Jing, J. (2018). Millennials’ online social interaction engagement and its impact on emotions.
22. Lutfiah, Y., Septiani, E., & Syah Putra, A. (2024). A study of semantic shift (slang) in English language.
Variable Research Journal, 1(2), 784789. https://variablejournal.my.id/index.php/VRJ/article/view/114
23. Lutviana, R., & Mafulah, S. (2021). The use of slang words in online learning context of EFL class.
EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(1), 5562.
https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i1.6118
24. Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. C. H. Beck.
25. Mattiello, E. (2008). An introduction to English slang: A description of its morphology, semantics and
sociology. Polimetrica.
26. Neshkovska, S. (2020). The anti-language in the English as a foreign language curriculum. Respectus
Philologicus, 37(42), 4761. https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2020.37.42.38
27. Ogheneakpobor, E. (2023). The morphology and effect of SMS/social media habituation on the spelling
patterns of some secondary students in Delta State, Nigeria. Kampala International University
Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1) https://doi.org/10.59568/kijhus-2024-4-1-
08.
28. Olobia, L. P. (2024). Utilizing social media in communicating in English as a second language. Studies in
Self-Access Learning Journal, 15(1), 109118. https://doi.org/10.37237/150103
29. Padohinog, E. C., Abenir, M. A., Llagas, R. O., & Gonzalvo, R. P. (2020). Knowledge and perceptions
towards Internet slang of the grade 9 students in General Emilio Aguinaldo National High School. SDCA
Journal of Education, 5, 2332.
30. Pedro, J. C. (2022). The influence of straight outta Compton’s slang on daily conversation of college
students. English Journal, 2228.
31. Pew Research Center. (2023). Teens, social media and technology 2023.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/11/15/teens-social-media-and-technology-2023/
32. Pongsapan, N. P. (2022). An analysis of slang language used in English students’ interaction. Jurnal Onoma
Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 8(2),9179244. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma. v8i2.2359
33. Prayudha, J., & Pradana, A. (2023). The analysis of slang words in English online learning classroom.
JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 4(1),1833. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v4i1. 4885.
34. Rezeki, T. I., & Sagala, R. W. (2019). Semantics analysis of slang (SAOS) in social media of the millennial
generation. Jurnal Kredo, 3(1), 3646.
35. Rusfandi, E. K. (2020). The use of slang on EFL students’ Instagram statuses: Do they perceive it as
essential? Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 542, 106109.
Page 243
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXII October 2025
36. Saputra, L., & Marlina, L. (2019). An analysis of slang words used by Instagram account Plesbol. English
Language and Literature, 8(3), 329339. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i3.105802
37. Sardiyah, N. (2020). Pengaruh bahasa gaul terhadap penggunaan bahasa Indonesia mahasiswa UNS 2019.
[Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta]
38. Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-
analytical review of Communication Accommodation Theory. Annals of the International Communication
Association, 38(1), 107-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2014.11679160
39. Silalahi, D. (2023). Social media slang and generational language change in Indonesia. Asian Journal of
Language Studies, 11(1), 88102.
40. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language.
American Speech, 83(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001
41. Vacalares, S. T., & Cagalawan, A. L. (2023). The intelligibility of internet slang between Millennials and
Gen Zers. International Journal of Scientific Research and Applications, 11(4), 456465.
https://ijsra.net/sites/default/files/IJSRA-2023-0456.pdf.
42. Za, D. R., Wicaksono, A., Purnamawati, N., Ajeng, G. D., Maximilian, A., & Hejash, M. (2023). Slang as a
medium of communication for adolescents in social interaction between others. Journal of English Teaching
and Applied Linguistic, 4(1), 114.
43. Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2018). Communication accommodation theory. In J. M. Bennett (Ed.), The
International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 95108). Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0156