women's language feature in Meghan Markle's speech is the use of emphatic stress, followed by lexical hedges,

intensifiers, and the use of rising intonation on declaratives. These linguistic traits perform diverse functions,

ranging from seeking confirmation and expressing politeness to emphasising crucial ideas. The results of this

study have significant implications. For educators in English and Linguistics, the findings can inspire the use

of diverse media, such as podcasts, to create more engaging teaching and learning experiences. Students

interested in sociolinguistics can gain deeper insights into the study of women's language features.

Additionally, future researchers in the field of language and gender, particularly those exploring women's

languages, can use this research as a valuable reference to enrich discussions on this topic and advance their

own studies.

People utilise these to either exert or cede control (Parab, 2015; Holmes, 1997). As numerous researchers have

shown in their recent work, language is used to portray people's various social identities. In any given

interaction, people utilise its symbolic power to build a particular identity, as well as to demonstrate their

conformity with or against conventionalised norms and values (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 1995; Cameron,

1995 cited in Holmes 1997).

In social context, language influences the way individuals present themselves and how they are perceived by

others as group members. In the year 2023, a minority group of Americans were found listening and involving

in media venue such as podcast. This growth highlights the importance of verbal contact for social analysis

(McKeown & Dixon, 2017). Stance-taking, which covers evaluation, positioning, and alignment, indexes

social identities throughout continuous contact (Schrauf, López De Victoria, and Diaz, 2020). As a result,

communication, women actively employ communication elements such as intensifiers, hedges, and tag

question. This action also helps them to put more structure in their rapport and stand in conversation. The

integration of these elements is more prominent in podcast especially by the hosts when they want to

emphasize points during the session. However, the is a risk of biasness in the audience that can interpret this as

inconsistency or informality.

The study of language in relation to gender research has progressed quite dramatically since the 1960s. A

linguist named Robin Lakoff took the first step in the in-depth research of this relationship through her seminal

publication of "Language and Woman's Place" to explore the validity of the book's assertions. Some research

backs up Lakoff's claims (Crosby & Nyquist, 1977), while other research contradicts them (Dubois & Crouch,

discourse is not as thoroughly examined. As a result, the stakes are high, and little is known about how

prominent leaders use linguistic traits to construct identity and credibility.

Secondly, numerous previous research focuses on carefully regulated or scripted speech rather than the

impromptu, turn-by-turn conversation that characterizes many podcasts. Decontextualized perception tasks

strip away the broader discursive and interactional context that shapes how utterances and actions are

interpreted. This can flatten the dynamic, multimodal, and sequential nature of real interactions, making it

difficult to capture how meaning and social affordances emerge in context (Trujillo & Holler, 2023) Without

the social stakes of in-person discussion, these designs extract judgments about appropriateness or correctness.

As a result, nothing is known about how tag questions, intensifiers, and hedges differ depending on the topic

and role in an interview.

emphasis, rapport, and position in women's speech are still not well understood in high-profile contexts.

In addition, previous studies only put the focus on scripted materials such as movies, talk shows and

interviews. This puts a neglection on the potential of podcast as the other main materials. This research took a

novel approach by exploring the linguistic analysis within the context of the "Archetypes" podcast. The main

focal point of the podcast is the discussions of the history of stereotypes against women. The podcast was

hosted by Meghan Markle, one of the most influential women in the society. By examining Markle's language

patterns in this specific podcast, the research contributed to the broader discourse on gender and language use.

A program for examining the ways in which gendered power manifests in everyday speech was laid out in

Lakoff's Language and Woman's Place (1975). It proposed a group of characteristics, including hedges,

intensifiers, tag questions, empty adjectives, rising intonation, hypercorrect grammar, super polite forms,

avoidance of strong swear words, and precise colour terms. These terms collectively indicate social

positioning. Although the framework was created based on reflective observation, subsequent research has

made it clearer how these characteristics interact.

For example, rather than only indicating hesitancy, tag questions might seek alignment and structure discourse

(Martínez Caro, 2020). In addition, stance-taking connects these forms to identity work throughout the moment

(Schrauf, López De Victoria, & Diaz, 2020). Evaluations are never just linguistic; listeners’ values and

By demonstrating how particular characteristics do social labour across contexts and modalities, research

applies or amends Lakoff's assertions. For instance, analyses of tag questions show not only seeming

ambiguity but also epistemic and participatory roles in unplanned discourse (Martínez Caro, 2020). Perception

research further highlights the social costs of gendered performance by demonstrating that female indexed

elements in a live discourse. Consequently, Lakoff’s features provide a tractable lens, while contemporary

evidence warns that their interpretation depends on discourse function and listener stance.

According to Lakoff (1975) and Martínez Caro (2020), Lakoff’s framework lays out how these elements such

as tag questions, hedges, intensifiers, increasing intonation, and refraining from using harsh profanity influence

stance in real-time conversation. Weissler (2022) claimed that listeners’ perspective affects how the elements

are evaluated. Chao and Bursten (2021) added that women’s approaches can develop relationships as well as

inviting criticism in public discourse. In contrast, scripted experiments rarely capture timing, overlap, and

repair, which are highlighted in unplanned podcast discussion. This raises methodological issues with regard

to audience posture and context. As a result, in unplanned circumstances, gaps continue. Using Archetypes

through this perspective examines how characteristics group together, how functions change between subjects,

corpus research manually concorded "I mean," "I think," "you see," and "you know," demonstrating that "you

know" is the most common and multipurpose phrase in academic discourse. The combined evidence points to

fillers or discourse markers as essential resources.

questions were mostly employed by instructors to stress or confirm rather than to hedge. "You know" and "I

mean" help with audience control and coherence. According to COCA-based corpus analysis, hedged

performatives such as “I must acknowledge” and “I must say” regulate rapport and position in American

spoken media. These results show that women's public discourse combines affiliation and emphasis. Thus, this

calls for a careful sampling when extrapolating across genres.

Multimodal coordination is now recognized as a source of interactional distinctions in conversation analysis.

Eye tracking and multi-camera video were combined in a study that demonstrated how gaze and manual

Systematic distinctions are highlighted by comparative work across genres and mediums. Compared to

unstructured conversation, interpreted English exhibits fewer hedges, indicating that institutional objectives

and processing limitations limit mitigation. Strategic interpersonal and ideational decisions that prioritize

clarity above interactive scaffolding are evident in public monologic speech, such as official addresses. In the

meantime, multifunctional discourse cues that coordinate audience alignment and turn taking are documented

in academic spoken corpora. Because of this, conversational practices vary depending on the production

demand and the participation framework, and transparent coding and genre-sensitive sampling are necessary

for reliable comparisons.

Numerous significant correlations are revealed by the evaluated studies. While gendered assessments continue

to exist in public settings, hedges, fillers, and discourse markers are repeatedly found to be multipurpose tools

for controlling posture and interaction across strands. Claims of politeness or weakness are complicated by the

persistent pattern of women's linguistic characteristics being read biasedly rather than functionally. In terms of

methodology, a lot of research uses data that is scripted or based on corpora, which restricts our understanding

systematic approach to the analysis, enhancing the reliability of the findings. The integration of content

interpret the language features used by Meghan Markle. This helps to contribute to the broader understanding