Page 280
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Investigating Public Speaking Anxiety and the Pygmalion Effect
*1
Lim Siew Mei,
2
Lee Ai Chat,
3
Chee Sie Ching,
4
On Yee Min,
5
Ang Wei Yin,
6
Noor Hanim Rahmat
1
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Alam, Malaysia
2
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Alam, Malaysia
3
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Arau, Malaysia
4
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Alam, Malaysia
5
Pusat Pengajian Bahasa, Tamadun & Falsafah, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
6
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Alam, Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0031
Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 30 October 2025
ABSTRACT
Public speaking is a fundamental skill valued in academic, professional, and social contexts. However, for
many learners, speaking in front of an audience provokes significant anxiety that can undermine confidence,
reduce participation, and impair academic performance. Public speaking anxiety (PSA) is recognised as a
situation-specific form of communication apprehension, encompassing cognitive components such as self-
beliefs and performance expectations; behavioural responses such as avoidance or visible tension while
speaking; and physiological manifestations that can affect delivery quality. These components often interact,
shaping how individuals perceive and respond to speaking situations. The purpose of this study was to
investigate public speaking anxiety among undergraduates and to explore how learners identify beliefs and
expectations, behaviours and performance in public speaking anxiety. Quantitative research through the lens of
the Pygmalion effect was conducted among 204 undergraduates from various majors at a university in
Selangor who were studying Mandarin (level 2 and above). The survey instrument employed is the 5-point
Likert scale survey. This study replicates the findings of Bartholomay & Houlihan (2016). The study is divided
into four parts that address the demographic profile, beliefs and expectations, behaviour, and performance. The
study reveals that the most prominent concern was the fear of forgetting lines or losing words during a
Mandarin public speaking session. The findings suggest that internal anxiety, rather than external factors like
audience interaction, primarily triggers learners' behaviours associated with public speaking anxiety. The result
also indicates that learners' self-evaluations were more strongly linked to physiological symptoms of anxiety,
such as muscle tension and raised heart rate, than to severe physical discomfort. Lastly, the findings reveal that
a strong positive relationship exists between all the Pygmalion effects on public speaking anxiety.
Keywords: Public Speaking Anxiety, The Pygmalion Effect, Foreign Language Learning
INTRODUCTION
Background of Study
Public speaking is a fundamental skill valued in academic, professional, and social contexts. However, for
many learners, speaking in front of an audience provokes significant anxiety that can undermine confidence,
reduce participation, and impair academic performance (Bodie, 2010). Public speaking anxiety (PSA) is
recognised as a situation-specific form of communication apprehension, encompassing cognitive components
such as self-beliefs and performance expectations; behavioural responses such as avoidance or visible tension
while speaking; and physiological manifestations that can affect delivery quality (Antony et al., 2006; Behnke
Page 281
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
& Sawyer, 2004; McCroskey & Andersen, 1976). These components often interact, shaping how individuals
perceive and respond to speaking situations.
PSA is especially common in higher education, where learners are frequently required to give presentations,
join group discussions, and complete performance-based assessments. Research has linked higher levels of
PSA to reduced academic achievement, reduced participation, and negative self-evaluation in academic
contexts (Gallego et al., 2022; McCroskey & Andersen, 1976; Tridinanti, 2018). Despite decades of research,
many learners continue to struggle with PSA, often without access to targeted strategies that address the
combined influence of psychological, behavioural, and physiological factors.
The Pygmalion effect provides a useful prism for understanding these patterns. This psychological theory
proposes that individuals’ performance can be shaped by the expectations placed upon them, whether by others
or internalised from prior experiences (Bushra, 2024; Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968). In the context of PSA,
learners who expect to perform poorly may unintentionally behave in ways that confirm those expectations,
reinforcing anxiety and perpetuating underperformance.
Structured instruments, such as the Public Speaking Anxiety Scale (PSAS), provide standardised ways to
assess PSA across cognitive, behavioural, and affective dimensions (Bartholomay & Houlihan, 2016).
However, such tools often overlook the subjective reasoning underlying learners’ experiences. A recent
qualitative study among postgraduate students in Malaysian public universities found that while PSA scales
can quantify levels of fear, only in-depth interviews revealed the nuanced sources of anxiety and the strategies
learners adopt to manage it, highlighting the value of approaches that capture personal interpretations (Mohd
Sobri Paridaluddin et al., 2023).
How students manage speaking tasks depends partly on their coping habits and personality. (Diephaus, 2022;
Kelsen, 2019). A more holistic understanding of PSA, therefore, requires attention to both shared patterns and
individual variability. By focusing on the learners’ perspectives, the present study seeks to inform evidence-
based interventions that can help them manage PSAs and realise their communication potential.
Accordingly, this study investigates how learners perceive PSA through the lens of the Pygmalion effect,
focusing on beliefs and expectations, behavioural responses, and perceived performance, as well as the
relationships among these components.
Statement of Problem
The psychological and academic consequences of PSA are well documented (Behnke & Sawyer, 2004; Dwyer
& Davidson, 2012), yet many studies examine its components separately. Research often focuses exclusively
on symptoms, coping strategies, or performance outcomes without capturing how these aspects interact in
authentic academic settings.
Despite the well-established Pygmalion effect in educational research, its application to PSA remains limited.
Few studies have explored how perceived expectations, whether from lecturers, peers, or prior experiences,
shape speaking behaviour and self-assessed performance. This is a significant gap given the cyclical nature of
anxiety and the role of self-beliefs in sustaining avoidance and underperformance (Bushra, 2024; Rosenthal &
Jacobson, 1968).
Recent research highlights the value of qualitative, learner-centred approaches to capturing individuals’
interpretations of anxiety, expectations, and performance. Grieve et al. (2021), in a qualitative study of
students’ fears and coping strategies in public speaking, show how such methods can reveal aspects of PSA
that standard measures may overlook. Similarly, Kelsen (2019) highlights the role of personality and coping
styles in communication apprehension, while Diephaus (2022) provides recent, context-specific insights,
reinforcing the need for in-depth and contextually informed exploration.
In response, the present study seeks to provide an integrated perspective on PSA by examining how learners
identify and relate their beliefs, behaviours, and performances to public speaking contexts. By doing so, the
Page 282
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
study aims to enhance both theoretical understanding and practical strategies for supporting learners, especially
by clarifying the influence of expectations on performance in higher education.
Objective of the Study and Research Questions
The purpose of this study was to investigate public speaking anxiety among undergraduates. This study
specifically aims to address the following research questions.
How do learners identify beliefs and expectations in public speaking anxiety?
How do learners identify behaviours associated with public speaking anxiety?
How do learners evaluate their performance in public speaking anxiety?
Is there a relationship between all the Pygmalion effects in public speaking anxiety?
LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical Framework of the Study
According to Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968), teachers' expectations of students influence their self-fulfilling
prophecy and lead to improved academic performance. This is known as the Pygmalion Effect. Rosenthal's
research identified five stages: 1. Factors that trigger teacher expectations, 2. Teacher expectations, 3. Positive
changes in students as a result of these expectations, 4. Short-term outcomes of these changes, and 5. Long-
term outcomes of these changes (Rosenthal, 1994). According to the Pygmalion effect, regardless of whether
the teacher's expectations of students are accurate, students will perceive and respond to the teacher's
expectations, resulting in positive learning outcomes. Rosenthal also proposed a four-factor "theory" that
influences teacher expectations. Teachers create a warmer social and emotional environment for different
students, teach more content and more challenging material, and provide students with more opportunities to
respond and more informative feedback (Rosenthal, 1994). These differential treatments can affect students’
self-fulfilling prophecy and learning motivation. Students receiving more positive evaluations and positive
suggestions can help them improve their self-efficacy and self-esteem. (Lee Jussim, Stephanie Madon, 1994).
In a competitive global world, public speaking is a necessary skill for university students. Horwitz et al. (1986)
discovered that students learning a foreign language often struggle with speaking in class. Students often report
that they tend to freeze during public speaking situations in foreign language classes. Symptoms of public
speaking anxiety include trembling, sweating, a rapid heartbeat, and difficulty breathing (Mokhtar, 2025).
Fauzi et al. (2023) highlight that a lack of public speaking skills and the ability to effectively engage with an
audience are considered key factors contributing to public speaking anxiety. The absence of public speaking
skills can result in students feeling less confident, which in turn contributes to their public speaking anxiety. In
addition, Taly & Paramasivam (2020) found that speakers are worried that their lack of professional
knowledge during public speaking will cause the audience to have negative evaluations and judgements about
them. Ikhsanto & Nastiti (2025) believe that self-confidence levels are one of the factors affecting public
speaking anxiety. People who lack confidence are more likely to experience disruptions due to doubts about
their abilities, which then lead to nervousness and anxiety. Raja's (2017) research has shown that students' fear
of public speaking is acquired and can be overcome through constant practice and rehearsal before giving a
speech.
For many people, even the thought of speaking in front of others triggers intense anxiety and fear. Studies have
identified that low confidence, concerns about content accuracy, fear of criticism, and limited audience
engagement skills are key contributors to public speaking anxiety. Overcoming these fears is crucial for
enhancing public speaking skills.
Page 283
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Past Studies on Public Speaking Anxiety
Researchers have widely studied public speaking anxiety among undergraduates. The study conducted by
Ch’ng
et al. (2025) examined the causes of anxiety, overall anxiety levels, and contributing factors specifically among
undergraduate learners of English as a second language. The study conducted a mixed-methods approach
among 65 undergraduates at Universiti Teknologi MARA. The study suggests that alleviating public speaking
anxiety requires targeted supportive interventions to address fear of negative evaluation and communication
anxiety. It also suggests that ungraded speaking activities, involving students in group discussions or informal
presentations, can gradually build students' confidence and strengthen their English communication skills.
The study by Mokhtar (2025), using semi-structured interviews, investigated public speaking anxiety and
coping strategies among Malaysian university students. The study involved 22 Malaysian university students
enrolled in public speaking and related courses. The study revealed that students face language and vocabulary
challenges during public speaking and experience anxiety due to concerns about grammatical errors and
negative feedback. It was also suggested ways to reduce public speaking anxiety, including deep breathing,
positive self-talk, seeking peer support, and avoiding direct eye contact or using props or scripts.
Next, the study by Abdullah et al. (2024) is done to investigate the difficulties and obstacles faced by
Malaysian undergraduates in public speaking in English through face-to-face semi-structured interviews with
44 undergraduates from nine different faculties at Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Malaysia.
According to the findings, undergraduates face poor language skills in grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation,
and fluency in public speaking in English, which in turn leads to a dislike for English, nervousness, low self-
esteem, lack of confidence, shyness, and fear of eye contact.
The study by Liu (2024) investigated the impact of personality traits and self-perceived public speaking ability
on public speaking anxiety. The study was done in China. 205 university students participated in the
questionnaire. The results first indicated that personality traits influence public speaking anxiety. The study
also indicated that individuals who are extroverted, self-disciplined, and emotionally stable are less anxious
when speaking in English in public.
Next, Gebre (2024) conducted a study to explore the main factors contributing to students' anxiety about public
speaking. The study involved 35 fourth-year psychology students at the Faculty of Education and Behavioural
Sciences at Bonga University. The study employed a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods.
Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The results revealed that lack of confidence was
the primary cause of students' fear of public speaking. The study also found that students who excelled in
debate and public speaking performed better and experienced less anxiety during presentations.
A study by Sulistyowati & Mukti (2023) investigated the level of foreign language learning anxiety in online
public speaking courses and explored its impact on students' experiences after participating in these courses.
This study employed a quantitative research method and questionnaire survey among 50 randomly selected
students from a total of 159 students at Sanata Dharma University. The results indicated that students reported
feeling more anxious during offline public speaking courses compared to online courses. Students expressed
concerns about difficulties in giving presentations in real life.
In summary, a lack of confidence among university students causes public speaking anxiety, leading to
concerns about grammatical errors and negative feedback. Confidence can’t be built instantly. It requires long-
term practice, including developing eye contact with the audience and expanding vocabulary, to reduce
students' public speaking anxiety.
Conceptual Framework of the Study
The Pygmalion effect was introduced by Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968), and the effect states that one person's
expectations influence another person’s behaviour. In the context of public speaking anxiety, when a speaker
Page 284
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
prepares for a public speaking presentation, the speakers anxieties extend beyond his or her fears. To begin
with, personally, the speaker is anxious to start the presentation, no matter how prepared he or she is.
Nevertheless, what added to the anxiety is the audience’s expectation that the presentation is worth listening to.
The person who assesses expects the speaker to prove that he or she has learnt well. Lastly, the speaker expects
that he or she will perform well. This is also reported by Rahmat (2019), who agrees that the speakers
expectations are influenced by both internal (the speaker) and external factors (the audience and the assessor).
Figure 1 below shows the conceptual framework of the study. The concept of this study is based on the factors
of Pygmalion Effects by Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968), which state that the speaker is influenced by the beliefs
of others (the audience). The speaker's cognitive elements, such as confidence, concentration, and even worry,
manifest this belief. This action then influences the actions of others (the audience and the assessor). The
speaker's behaviour reflects the influence of others. This, in turn, influences how the speaker performs and is
perceived in terms of physiological aspects.
Figure 1 Conceptual Framework of the Study
Public Speaking Anxiety and the Pygmalion Effect
METHODOLOGY
This quantitative study investigates public speaking anxiety through the lens of the Pygmalion effect. The
survey had 204 respondents, which was a convenient sample size. The survey employed a 5-point Likert scale.
Table 1 displays the categories used for the Likert scale: 1 stands for never, 2 for rarely, 3 for sometimes, 4 for
very often, and 5 for always.
Table 1 Likert Scale Use
1
Never
2
Rarely
3
Sometimes
4
Very Often
5
Always
Table 2 displays the survey distribution. This study replicates Bartholomay & Houlihan’s (2016) findings to
reveal the variables listed in the table below. The survey comprises four parts. Section A contains items about
the demographic profile. Section B has 8 items on Beliefs & Expectations. Section C has 6 items on behaviour,
and Section D has 5 items on performance.
Page 285
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Table 2 Distribution of Items in the Survey
Table 2 also shows the reliability of the survey. Cronbach’s alpha values for beliefs and expectations are .921,
.901 for behavioural, and .898 for physiological. The overall Cronbach's alpha for all 19 items is .958, thus
revealing a good reliability of the instrument chosen (Jackson, 2015). Further analysis is performed using
SPSS to provide findings which answer the research questions for this study.
FINDINGS
Demographic Analysis
Table 3 Percentage for Demographic Profile
Table 3 demonstrates the gender distribution, the academic background, the Mandarin level, the fear of
learning Mandarin and the self-rated Mandarin proficiency of 204 respondents who participated in this study.
There were 20% male and 80% female respondents. This indicates that the respondent group consists of a
greater proportion of females compared to males. The respondents are distributed across various disciplines.
Among 204 respondents, 48% are students engaged in business, management and accounting; 20% in
engineering; 12% in arts and humanities; 11% in computer science; and 9% in law.
As the survey was targeted to explore the public speaking anxiety of the undergraduates who had been through
the language project that includes public speaking in the previous semester, students who were still in
Mandarin level 1 were excluded from the survey, as they had no experience with the language project that
would be held at the end of the semester yet. Out of a total of 204 respondents, 38% are enrolled in Mandarin
Page 286
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Level 2 (TMC451), 30% are registered in Mandarin for Business Communication Level 2 (TMC452), and
32% are registered in Mandarin Level 3 (TMC501).
Table 3 shows that 68% of respondents are not afraid to learn Mandarin, while 32% are. For the self-rated
Mandarin proficiency, almost half of the respondents, or 43%, rated themselves as unable to communicate in
Mandarin; 53% of the respondents rated themselves as able to communicate in basic Mandarin, and only 4% of
the respondents rated themselves as able to communicate fluently in Mandarin. The data indicate that while the
majority of students hold a positive attitude toward learning Mandarin, overall self-rated speaking proficiency
remains low, with most respondents reporting either no ability or only basic ability to communicate.
Descriptive Statistics
Findings for Beliefs & Expectations
This section presents data to answer research question 1: How do learners identify beliefs & expectations about
public speaking anxiety? The study measures this through cognitive factors.
Figure 2 Mean for Cognitive Factors
Figure 2 presents findings addressing Research Question 1 on how learners identify beliefs and expectations in
public speaking anxiety. In this study, these were measured through eight cognitive factors. The most
prominent concern (mean = 3.7, SD = 0.9) was the fear of forgetting lines or losing words during a Mandarin
role-play session. This was followed by worries about embarrassing oneself (mean = 3.5, SD = 1.1) and
difficulty refocusing after mistakes (mean = 3.5, SD = 1.1), indicating consistently high levels of apprehension
in these areas. Feelings of terror before performing (mean = 3.2, SD = 1.0), low confidence (mean = 3.2, SD =
1.0), and dissatisfaction after performance (mean = 3.23, SD = 1.1) also featured prominently. Lower, though
still notable, means were recorded for concerns about classmates’ perceptions (mean = 3.1, SD = 1.2) and
difficulty concentrating during the role-play (mean = 3.1, SD = 1.0). Overall, the results suggest that cognitive
Page 287
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
dimensions of PSA are dominated by anticipatory fears of failure and negative evaluation, which may directly
influence learners’ focus, confidence, and self-assessment.
Findings for Behaviour
This section presents data to answer research question 2: How do learners identify behaviours associated with
public speaking anxiety?
Figure 3 Mean for Behavioural Factors
Figure 3 states the mean for behavioural factors. Item 5 (mean = 3.3, SD = 1.0) indicates that learners often
feel nervous and forget their lines during a Mandarin role-play. Next, item 1 (mean = 3.1, SD = 1.1) shows the
learners' experience of handshaking before or during performing a Mandarin role-play session. Item 2 (mean =
3.1, SD = 1.0) shows that the learners feel nervous before the Mandarin role-play session. Finally, item 4
(mean = 2.8, SD = 1.1) indicates that learners are hesitant to make eye contact with their teammates or the
audience during a Mandarin role-play session.
Findings for Performance
This section presents data to answer research question 3: How do learners identify their performance in public
speaking anxiety? In the context of this study, this is measured by physiological factors.
Figure 4 Mean for Physiological Factors
Figure 4 shows the mean for physiological factors. Item 2 (mean=3.1, SD=1.1) states that the learners felt
tense before the role-play. Item 3 (mean-3.1, SD-1.1) states that the learners experienced a rapid heartbeat
Page 288
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
during the Mandarin role-play session. Next, item 5 (mean=3, SD=1.0) states that they did not feel relaxed
during the role-play session. Lastly, item 1 (mean=2.4, SD=1.1) states that they felt sick before performing a
role-play.
Exploratory Statistics
Findings for the relationship between all components in Pygmalion effects on public speaking anxiety. This
section presents data to answer research question 3: Is there a relationship between all components of
Pygmalion effects in public speaking anxiety?
To determine if there is a significant association between the mean scores and all components of Pygmalion's
effects on public speaking anxiety, the data were analysed using SPSS for correlations. Results are presented
separately in tables 4, 5 and 6 below.
Table 4 Correlation between Beliefs & Expectations and Behaviour
Table 4 shows that there is an association between beliefs, expectations, and behaviours. Correlation analysis
indicates that there is a highly significant association between beliefs & expectations and behaviour (r=.804**)
and (p=.000). According to Jackson (2015), the coefficient is significant at the .05 level, and a positive
correlation is measured on a 0.1 to 1.0 scale. Weak positive correlation would be in the range of 0.1 to 0.3, a
moderate positive correlation from 0.3 to 0.5, and a strong positive correlation from 0.5 to 1.0. This also means
that there is a strong positive relationship between beliefs, expectations, and behaviours.
Table 5 Correlation between Behaviour and Performance
Table 5 shows that there is an association between behaviour and performance. Correlation analysis indicates
that there is a highly significant association between behaviour and performance (r=.802**) and (p=.000).
According to Jackson (2015), the coefficient is significant at the .05 level, and a positive correlation is
measured on a 0.1 to 1.0 scale. Weak positive correlation would be in the range of 0.1 to 0.3, a moderate
Page 289
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
positive correlation from 0.3 to 0.5, and a strong positive correlation from 0.5 to 1.0. This also means there is a
strong positive relationship between behaviour and performance.
Table 6 Correlation between Performance and Beliefs & Expectations
Table 6 shows that there is an association between performance and beliefs & expectations. Correlation
analysis indicates that there is a highly significant association between performance and beliefs & expectations
(r=.722**) and (p=.000). According to Jackson (2015), the coefficient is significant at the .05 level, and a
positive correlation is measured on a 0.1 to 1.0 scale. Weak positive correlation would be in the range of 0.1 to
0.3, a moderate positive correlation from 0.3 to 0.5, and a strong positive correlation from 0.5 to 1.0. This
means that there is also a strong positive relationship between performance, beliefs, and expectations.
CONCLUSION
Summary of Findings and Discussions
The study investigates public speaking anxiety among undergraduates. In response to the first research
question about how learners identify beliefs and expectations in public speaking anxiety, the findings indicate
that the most prominent concern was the fear of forgetting lines or losing words during a Mandarin role-play
session. In contrast, the least frequently reported concerns were about classmates' perceptions and difficulty
concentrating during the Mandarin role-play session. This indicates that learners may experience high levels of
internal anxiety related to memory and fluency. They are more focused on their performance than on external
judgements. The external factors, such as peer perceptions and distractions, play a comparatively smaller role
in their public speaking performance. This outcome aligns with a study by Tian Li (2020) about the analysis of
the causes and treatment of public speaking anxiety, which mentioned that when the amount of internal anxiety
exceeds a certain range, the role played by anxiety will hinder the speech from going smoothly, reducing the
overall performance of the speaker. Emotionally, tension and anxiety continue to flow in and accumulate
uncontrollably; the speakers might also lose their short-term memory. As a result, they may even forget what
they were supposed to say during the speech.
In response to the second research question on how learners identify behaviours associated with public
speaking anxiety. The results indicate that the learners easily feel nervous and forget their lines during a
Mandarin role-play. In contrast, learners rarely reported fear of making eye contact with their teammates or the
audience during a Mandarin roleplay session. The findings suggest that internal anxiety rather than external
factors, such as audience interaction, primarily triggers learners' behaviours associated with public speaking
anxiety. The outcome is in accordance with the study by Du et al. (2024). The research indicated that
behaviours reflecting students' anxiety include avoiding complex information in the target language, exhibiting
rigidity, forgetting vocabulary and grammar they have learnt, and struggling with the content of their prepared
speeches or presentations. Additionally, these findings are consistent with the results of the first research
question mentioned earlier.
To answer the third research question on how learners evaluate their performance in public speaking anxiety,
the results indicate that the learners felt tense before the role-play and experienced a rapid heartbeat during the
Page 290
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Mandarin role-play session. In contrast, feeling sick before performing a role-play was the least frequently
reported symptom. This indicates that learners' self-evaluations were more strongly linked to physiological
symptoms of anxiety, such as muscle tension and raised heart rate, than to severe physical discomfort. The
result is consistent with research by Astrero et al. (2024), which also found that physiological effects such as
increased heart rate and sweaty palms are common symptoms of public speaking anxiety that affect speaking
presentations.
Lastly, the findings reveal that a strong positive relationship exists between all the Pygmalion effects on public
speaking anxiety. The audience's beliefs and expectations influence a speaker's public speaking anxiety. The
speaker's cognitive elements, such as confidence, concentration, and even worry, manifest this belief. This
action then influences the actions of others (the audience and the assessor). The speaker's behaviour reflects
the influence of others. This, in turn, influences how the speaker performs and is perceived in terms of
physiological aspects.
Implications and Suggestions for Future Research
Theoretical and Conceptual Implications
The findings of this research align closely with the theoretical foundations of the Pygmalion Effect (Rosenthal
& Jacobson, 1968) and public speaking anxiety in foreign language learning contexts (Horwitz et al., 1986;
Fauzi et al., 2023; Ikhsanto & Nastiti, 2025).
The Pygmalion Effect emphasises that the expectations of others, particularly teachers, assessors, or audiences,
can shape individuals’ performances through self-fulfilling prophecies and lead to improved performance. In
this study, the audience and assessors beliefs and expectations were shown to influence learners’ cognitive
states, which in turn shaped their behaviours and physiological responses during public speaking tasks. These
findings also confirm Rosenthal’s four-factor theory that creating a social-emotional environment, teaching
more challenging content, providing opportunities to respond, and providing quality feedback contribute to
performance outcomes.
From the perspective of public speaking anxiety, the study provides evidence that internal factors such as
worry about forgetting lines, nervous feelings, and physiological arousal are the primary triggers of anxiety in
Mandarin role-play activities. While literature often cites external factors such as fear of negative evaluation
and audience interaction avoidance as significant causes of public speaking anxiety, this study reveals that
these were less prominent among the participants. This suggests that in the specific context of Mandarin
language role-play, learners’ anxiety is more internally driven, resonating with Ikhsanto and Nastiti’s (2025)
argument that self-confidence plays a pivotal role in managing public speaking anxiety.
Conceptually, this integration highlights that the Pygmalion Effect does not operate in isolation but interacts
dynamically with the cognitive and physiological dimensions of public speaking anxiety. Expectations from
the audience and assessors influence internal cognitive states, which subsequently manifest as observable
behaviours and physical symptoms. This cyclical relationship reinforces the need for interventions that target
both the modification of audience or assessor expectations (external) and the strengthening of learners’ self-
efficacy, memory strategies, and anxiety regulation techniques (internal). Such a dual-focus approach can more
effectively reduce public speaking anxiety and enhance performance in foreign language learning contexts.
Pedagogical Implications
The findings of this study have several pedagogical implications for reducing public speaking anxiety and
enhancing fluency and confidence among university students learning Mandarin, particularly in role-play
contexts. Lecturers should cultivate a supportive, mistake-friendly learning environment that normalises errors
and views them as integral to the learning process. They should use positive reinforcement and avoid public
shaming to reduce the fear of negative evaluation.
Page 291
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
To address the common fear of forgetting lines, instructors should train students to use keyword prompts and
get out of trouble” phrases while also encouraging rehearsal, paraphrasing, and improvisation skills.
Providing constructive, specific feedback that emphasises strengths, coupled with in-class anxiety management
techniques such as deep breathing and positive self-talk, can help learners manage physiological symptoms
like increased heart rates and tension.
Additionally, lecturer training programmes should include explicit instructions on recognising signs of foreign
language anxiety, implementing classroom coping strategies, applying positive psychology principles, and
moderating expectations to create a warm, non-judgemental learning environment.
By combining emotional support with structured practice, memory strategies, and anxiety-reduction
techniques, lecturers can help Mandarin learners gradually overcome their fear of public speaking, improve
their fluency, and build lasting confidence for real-world communication.
Suggestions for Future Research
Future researchers could further explore the interaction between the Pygmalion Effect and public speaking
anxiety in different language learning contexts, including other foreign languages and various proficiency
levels, to examine whether similar patterns emerge. Research comparing different anxiety-reduction strategies,
such as role-play variations and memory-enhancement techniques, could provide more conclusive evidence on
their effectiveness in reducing public speaking anxiety. Besides that, future research could also investigate how
changes in lecture expectations influence learners’ public speaking experiences and achievement responses
during public speaking tasks.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable contributions of all researchers who supported this study.
REFERENCES
1. Abdullah, A. T. H., Netra, I. M., & Hassan, I. (2024). Difficulties faced by undergraduate students in
English public speaking at a Malaysian university. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume,
15(March), 269282.
2. Antony, M. M., Orsillo, S. M., & Roemer, L. (2006). Practitioners guide to empirically based measures of
anxiety. Springer Science & Business Media.
3. Astrero, M. K., Galo, D. K., Doyaoen, S. I., De Vera, A. M., & Eugenio, E. (2024). English language
competence, communicative competence, and public speaking anxiety of pre-service teachers. International
Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(11), 153167.
https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.11.18
4. Bartholomay, E. M., & Houlihan, D. D. (2016). Public Speaking Anxiety Scale: Preliminary psychometric
data and scale validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 211
215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.026
5. Behnke, R. R., & Sawyer, C. R. (2004). Public speaking anxiety as a function of sensitization and
habituation processes. Communication Education, 53(2), 1641173.
6. Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and
treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70105.
7. Bushra, F. T. (2024). Pygmalion effect in tertiary classrooms: Investigating the relationship between
teachers’ expectations and students’ English language performance in tertiary level. Brac University.
8. Ch’ng, L. (2025). Exploring ESL Public Speaking Anxiety Among Undergraduates. Journal of Creative
Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 146169. https://doi.org/10.24191/cplt.v13i1.4234
9. Diephaus, J. (2022). A Study on the Mediating Effect of Coping Style on the Relationship between
Personality Traits and Public-Speaking Anxiety among University Students. University of Twente.
10. Du, Y., Hu, Y., & Qi, K. (2024). The Effect of Anxiety and Tension Induced in Foreign Language Learners
by Public Speaking and Classroom Presentations on Foreign Language Learning Outcomes. International
Journal of Education and Humanities, 16(1), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.54097/9aqshk34
Page 292
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
11. Dwyer, K. K., & Davidson, M. M. (2012). Is Public Speaking Really More Feared Than
Death? Communication Research Reports, 29(2), 99107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.667772
12. Gallego, A., McHugh, L., Penttonen, M., & Lappalainen, R. (2021). Measuring Public Speaking Anxiety:
Self-report, behavioral, and physiological. Behavior Modification, 46, 782 - 798.
13. Fauzi, S. F. N., Johari, A., Rijeng, J. S., Sarkawi, A., & Bujang, A. (2023). Examining public speaking
anxiety and intervention strategies in rural Sarawak: A community-based perspective. Journal of
Administrative Science, 20(2), 2132. https://jas.uitm.edu.my/images/2023_DEC/2.pdf
14. Gebre, M. (2024). Assess the Factors Contributing to Students' Public Speaking Anxiety Specifically
During Classroom Presentations. International Journal of Psychological Science, 4(4), 65-76.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijps.20240404.11
15. Grieve, R., Woodley, J., Hunt, S. E., & McKay, A. (2021). Student fears of oral presentations and public
speaking in higher education: a qualitative survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1281
1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1948509
16. Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019). Public Speaking. Managing Social Anxiety,
Workbook. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/s8-iii.57.69e
17. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern
Language Journal, 70(2), 125132. https://www.ling.ohio-
state.edu/research/groups/lacqueys/readings/horowitz.pdf
18. Ikhsanto, A. B., & Nastiti, D. (2025). The Relationship Between Self-Confidence and Anxiety of Public
Speaking in College Students. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science and
Humanity, 2(3), 355366. https://doi.org/10.61796/icossh.v2i3.151
19. Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (5th ed.). Cengage
Learning.
20. Kelsen, B.A. (2019). Exploring public speaking anxiety and personal disposition in EFL
presentations. Learning and Individual Differences.
21. Lee Jussim, Stephanie Madon, C. C. (1994). Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement-Self-Fulfilling
Prophecies, Biases and Accuracy (pp. 303324). Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues,
Plenum Press.
22. Li, T. (2020). Analysis on the causes and treatment of public speaking anxiety. Proceedings of the 2020 4th
International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2020), 483487.
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200826.103
23. Liu, S. (2024). The effects of personality and self-perceived public speaking competence on public speaking
anxiety in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) presentation. Current Psychology, 3017030179.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06638-6
24. McCroskey, J. C., & Andersen, J. F. (1976). The relationship between communication apprehension and
academic achievement among college students. Human Communication Research, 3(1), 7381.
25. Mohd Sobri Paridaluddin, N. F., Zhang, J., & Chen, R. (2023). Factors of public speaking anxiety (PSA)
and strategies to mitigate PSA among postgraduate students of Malaysian public universities in online
presentations. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics (IJMAL), 7(3), 15
35.https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/84155/1/84155.pdf
26. Mokhtar, M. (2025). Factors of Public Speaking Anxiety (PSA) and Coping Strategies Among Malaysian
Public University Students in Virtual and Physical Presentations. 7(2), 149157.
27. Rahmat, N.H. (2019). Cycle of Fear in Learning: The Case for Three Language Skills. American Journal of
Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 151-162.
https://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/129/151
28. Raja, F. U. (2017). Anxiety Level in Students of Public Speaking: Causes and Remedies. Journal of
Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1001
29. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: A 30-Year Perspective. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 3(6), 176179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770698
30. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and student
intellectual development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
31. Sulistyowati, A. I., & Mukti, T. W. P. (2023). The EFL Students’ Anxiety in an Online Public Speaking
Class at an Indonesian University. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 10(1), 6277.
https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v10i1.13505
Page 293
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
32. Taly, B. C., & Paramasivam, S. (2020). Speaking Anxiety Among Postgraduate International Students in the
Academic Context of a University in Malaysia. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(1), 198.
https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i1.16053
33. Tridinanti, G. (2018). The correlation between speaking anxiety, self-confidence, and speaking achievement
of undergraduate EFL students of private university in Palembang. International Journal of Education and
Literacy Studies, 6(4), 3539. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.4p.35