Page 370
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
A Study of Motivation to Learn Online through the Cognitive Social
Learning Theory
*1
Suzana Hamzah,
2
Nur Maizura Lin,
3
Nur Huslinda Che Mat,
4
Noraini Hamzah,
5
Noor Hanim Rahmat
1, 2,3,5
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor
4
Fakulti Alam Bina, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0039
Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 30 October 2025
ABSTRACT
The rapid evolution of technology has transformed the educational landscape, with online learning becoming a
dominant mode of instruction in higher education. While online learning offers flexibility and accessibility, it
also presents challenges, particularly concerning learners' motivation. Grounded in Bandura’s (1986)
Cognitive Social Learning Theory and Fowler’s (2018) Online Learning Motivation model, this study
investigates undergraduate students’ perceptions of motivation in online learning, focusing on behavior,
personal components, and environment in online learning and explores the relationships among these factors.
A quantitative survey was conducted with 121 undergraduates using a validated instrument based on Bandura
(1986) and Fowler (2018). It consisted of four sections measuring expectancy (self-efficacy and control of
learning beliefs), value (intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientation, and task value), and social support (social
engagement and instructor support). Findings indicate that while students exhibit strong self-efficacy and
control over learning beliefs, extrinsic motivationsuch as achieving high grades and career aspirations
plays a more dominant role in engagement. Social support, particularly instructor interaction, significantly
impacts students' motivation, whereas limited peer interaction and feelings of isolation present challenges.
Correlation analysis reveals strong relationships between personal, behavioral, and environmental factors. The
study underscores the need for pedagogical strategies that enhance self-regulation, foster interactive learning
environments, and integrate structured instructor support. Future research should explore technological
innovations to enhance engagement.
Keywords: Cognitive Social Learning Theory, Online Learning Motivation, Distance Learning, Higher
Education
INTRODUCTION
The evolution of technology has transformed educational landscapes, with online learning emerging as a key
mode of instruction in higher education. The shift towards digital learning environments has been accelerated
by various global factors, including advancements in digital tools, increased internet accessibility, and, more
recently, the necessity brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic (Stephani et al., 2023; Al Rawashdeh et al.,
2021). As a result, online learning has provided students with flexibility, autonomy, and access to diverse
learning resources, which have reshaped traditional learning experiences (Chung et al., 2020; Sadeghi, 2019).
Despite its benefits, online learning presents significant challenges, particularly concerning learners’
motivation. Studies indicate that motivation plays a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of online
education, influencing students’ engagement, persistence, and overall academic success (Rahmat et al., 2021).
While some learners thrive in online environments due to the flexibility and accessibility they offer, others
struggle with self-regulation, limited interaction, and reduced engagement, which can lead to decreased
motivation and learning satisfaction (Meşe & Sevilen, 2021; Iftanti et al., 2023).
Page 371
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
To understand the factors influencing motivation in online learning, this study is grounded in Bandura’s (1986)
Cognitive Social Learning Theory and Fowler’s (2018) Online Learning Motivation model. Bandura’s theory
highlights the interaction between behaviour, personal factors, and environmental influences in shaping
learning experiences. Fowler (2018) further expands on this by identifying key sources of motivation in online
learning—expectancy, value, and social support. Expectancy refers to learners’ self-efficacy and belief in their
ability to succeed, value pertains to intrinsic and extrinsic motivation towards learning tasks, and social
support encompasses interactions with peers and instructors that foster engagement.
Given the increasing reliance on online education in higher learning institutions, it is crucial to explore how
learners perceive their motivation within this mode of learning. This study aims to investigate students’
perceptions of their behaviour, personal components, and environmental influences in online learning and
examine the relationships among these factors. Specifically, this study is done to answer the following
questions;
1) How do learners perceive behaviour in online learning?
2) How do learners perceive their personal components in online learning?
3) How do learners perceive their environment in online learning?
4) Is there a relationship between behaviour and personal components and environment in online
learning?
LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical Framework
Bandura’s (1986) Cognitive Social Learning Theory (CSLT) explains learning as an interaction between
personal beliefs, behaviors, and environmental influences. In online learning, this theory is especially relevant
as students must self-regulate, engage with digital platforms, and overcome challenges such as autonomy,
discipline, and social interaction (Rahmat et al., 2021). A key CSLT principle, self-efficacy, influences how
students approach online learning. Those with high self-efficacy are more likely to engage in coursework,
persist through challenges, and maintain motivation (Chung, Noor, & Mathew, 2020). On the other hand,
students with low self-efficacy often struggle with time management and self-discipline, leading to
disengagement (Iftanti et al., 2023).
Another CSLT component, observational learning, plays a critical role in motivation. In traditional classrooms,
students model behaviors by watching peers and instructors. However, in asynchronous online settings, the
absence of real-time interactions can make this process difficult (Meşe & Sevilen, 2021). To compensate,
online platforms incorporate discussion forums, peer feedback, and video-based interactions to foster social
learning (Rahmat et al., 2021). The environmental aspect of CSLT is also crucial. In online learning, factors
such as course design, instructor engagement, and feedback quality directly impact motivation (Al Rawashdeh
et al., 2021). Poorly structured courses with minimal instructor interaction often lead to demotivation, whereas
well-supported learning environments enhance engagement.
Benefits and Drawbacks on Online Learning
Online learning has redefined education, offering accessibility and flexibility, yet it also presents challenges
such as motivation loss, digital fatigue, and limited interaction. This section examines both the benefits and
drawbacks of online learning.
The primary advantage of online learning is its flexibility, allowing students to study at their own pace (Chung
et al., 2020). This is particularly valuable for working professionals and part-time learners who require
adaptable schedules (Stephani et al., 2023). Another key benefit is autonomy in learning, which fosters
intrinsic motivation. Students who set their own learning goals tend to stay engaged and perform better
(Rahmat et al., 2021). Many digital platforms now include interactive tools like gamification, AI-driven
recommendations, and multimedia content, making learning more engaging (Fowler, 2018). Additionally,
Page 372
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
diverse online resources enhance learning. Compared to traditional textbooks, online education provides access
to videos, simulations, and case studies, catering to different learning preferences (Al Rawashdeh et al., 2021).
Despite these advantages, student engagement and motivation remain major challenges. A key issue is the lack
of real-time interaction, which can lead to feelings of isolation. Research shows that students in online settings
often feel disconnected from instructors and peers, which negatively affects their learning experience (Meşe &
Sevilen, 2021). Unlike face-to-face education, where discussions occur naturally, online learners must make a
conscious effort to engage in digital interactions. Another challenge is that online learning requires strong self-
regulation skills, which not all students possess. Iftanti et al. (2023) found that students who lack time
management and self-discipline often fall behind due to fewer external pressures compared to traditional
classrooms. Technological limitations also create barriers to effective learning. Not all students have equal
access to high-speed internet, reliable devices, or quiet study environments, affecting their ability to participate
in online courses (Alfarimba et al., 2021). Additionally, excessive screen time has been linked to mental
fatigue, reduced concentration, and lower retention rates (Stephani et al., 2023).
The effectiveness of online learning depends on how well it is structured. While some students thrive in
flexible, self-paced environments, others struggle with lack of structure, social isolation, and limited instructor
support. Many experts suggest blended learning models as a solution, combining online flexibility with face-
to-face engagement (Al Rawashdeh et al., 2021). Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and adaptive
learning offer new possibilities by providing personalized feedback and real-time learning support. However,
further research is needed to determine the long-term impact of these technologies on motivation and student
performance.
Cognitive Social Learning Theory
The Cognitive Social Learning Theory (CSLT) introduced by Bandura (1986) emphasizes the interaction
between cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors in shaping motivation and learning. This theoretical
framework has been widely applied to online learning contexts, where self-efficacy, observational learning,
and social reinforcement play crucial roles in sustaining student motivation (Rahmat et al., 2021). While some
studies have demonstrated that self-regulation and autonomy are key predictors of motivation in online
environments (Chung et al., 2020), others highlight the necessity of instructor support and peer interaction to
prevent disengagement (Meşe & Sevilen, 2021).
Bandura’s (1986) framework aligns with Fowler’s (2018) Online Learning Motivation model, which identifies
expectancy, value, and social support as core determinants of motivation. Expectancy, measured by self-
efficacy and control beliefs, determines whether learners feel capable of succeeding in an online course. Value,
encompassing intrinsic and extrinsic goals, influences the level of engagement. Finally, social support, through
instructor guidance and peer collaboration, enhances motivation and persistence (Fowler, 2018). Thus, CSLT
provides a robust foundation for understanding online learning motivation through a multidimensional lens.
Motivation to learn Online
Learning online has brought about many benefits to both full-time and part-time learners. In a quantitative
study conducted by Chung et al. (2020), the respondents in the study generally agreed that online learning
motivated them in a lot of ways. The study investigated online readiness among UiTM Sarawak students. 91
respondents took part in this study and responded to the Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) survey. As
stated earlier, in general, the respondents felt that online learning brought about many benefits and this is
because they were able to share ideas and at the same time learn from their mistakes when learning online.
Besides that, the researchers stressed that motivation is not only important but also influences what people
learn, how and when they choose to study. This has indeed proven that online learning has its benefits. A
similar finding was also found in a study conducted by Al Rawashdeh et al. (2021). The purpose of this
quantitative study was to identify the advantages and disadvantages of online learning among university
learners in the United Arab Emirates. 100 learners responded to a close-ended structure questionnaire and
responses were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Results of the study revealed
that online learning increased learners’ motivation to learn. Al Rawashdeh et al. (2021) pointed out that online
Page 373
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
learning is an effective way of delivering teaching and learning. They believed that online learning may
someday take over the conventional way of learning as it helps learners in the educational process. Researchers
of the study also proposed for more studies to be conducted concerning online learning.
A qualitative study by Stephani et al. (2023) discovered a similar finding to the two earlier studies conducted
by Rawashdeh et al. (2021) and Chung et al. (2020). The study by Stephani et al. (2023) aimed to look at
university students' motivation to take up online learning programs. 32 respondents took part in the focused
group discussion session and responses from the respondents were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings
from the study highlighted four categories of motivation underlie students’ preference to participate in online
learning programs. Respondents felt that learning online gives them convenience. This is because they could
learn anytime and anywhere and at the same time build a network with other students. In addition, they could
also express their views regarding an issue and have discussions with other learners. Stephani et al. (2023)
stressed that motivation plays a crucial role in online learning as it can influence what, when, and how students
learn. To add, it is also a significant factor in determining students’ learning motivation.
Despite the positive benefits that online learning brings, there are also some drawbacks to online learning. In a
qualitative study carried out by Mese (2021) to explore students’ perceptions of online teaching and how it
affects their motivation, the findings were the opposite of the three earlier-mentioned studies. In the study,
semi-structured interviews were conducted and creative writing samples were collected from 12 respondents.
Upon completion of the data collection, the data analysis was done using thematic analysis. The findings of the
study discovered that the participants perceived online learning negatively due to the minimal communication
with their teachers and, classmates, and the lack of teachers’ feedback. However, when feedback was given
and more interaction between teachers and students took place, the respondents felt the motivation to learn
online better. The researchers believed that online learning presents many challenges to keep students
motivated in their learning process.
To conclude, based on the studies above, it could be seen that online learning has its perks and drawbacks.
Recent studies mentioned above proved that learners feel motivated when learning online for several reasons.
Although one of the studies presented above generally received negative feedback, however, when a more
conducive learning environment was shown by the teachers, the respondents felt motivated. Hence, it could be
proven that online learning boosts one’s motivation to learn.
Conceptual Framework
Learning is a process that requires many factors on the part of the learner. Bandura’s (1986) cognitive social
learning theory reports that learning is a behaviour and it is a personal process and requires the support from
the environment. Nevertheless, in order to sustain the learning behaviour, learners need to have motivation
(Rahmat,et.al, 2021). This study is rooted from Bandura’s cognitive social learning theory and Fowler’s (2018)
online learning motivation. Bandura’s (1986) concepts are scaffolded onto Fowler’s (2018) constructs to reveal
the conceptual framework presented in figure 1 below. According to Fowler (2018), the sources of online
motivation are expectancy, value and social support. Expectancy is measured by self-efficacy and control of
learning beliefs. Value is measured by intrinsic and extrinsic gal orientation as well as task value. Social
support is measured by social engagement and instructor support.
Figure 1 Conceptual Framework of the Study
Page 374
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
METHODOLOGY
This quantitative study is done to explore motivation factors for learning among undergraduates. A purposive
sample of 121 participants responded to the survey. The instrument used is a 5 Likert-scale survey and is
rooted from Bandura (1986) and Fowler (2018) to reveal the variables in table 1 below. The survey has 4
sections. Section A has items on demographic profile. Section B has 13 items on expectancy. Section C has 16
items on value. Section D has 11 items on social support.
The reliability analysis of the survey shows a Cronbach’s alpha of .931 for Section A, .914 for Section B, and
.881 for Section C. The overall reliability for all 40 items is .951, indicating that the instrument used has high
internal consistency. Further analysis using SPSS was conducted to present the findings and answer the
research questions of this study.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Findings for Demographic Profile
The survey revealed a higher representation of female participants (59%) compared to male participants (41%).
This imbalance suggests that female students were more actively involved in the study, possibly reflecting
broader enrollment patterns or greater willingness to participate in surveys on online learning motivation. The
majority of respondents were undergraduate degree students (80%), followed by diploma students (17%) and a
small proportion of postgraduate students (3%). This indicates that the study primarily reflects the perspectives
of undergraduates, who form the largest segment of online education participants. Most respondents were from
Business-related fields (64%), followed by Science & Technology (24%) and Social Sciences (12%). This
indicates that the study largely reflects the perspectives of business students, which may shape the findings on
motivation and engagement in online learning.
Findings for Behaviour
This section presents data to answer research question 1- How do learners perceive behaviour in online
learning? In the context of this study, behaviour is presented in Expectancy is measured by (i) self- efficacy
and (ii) control of learning-beliefs.
Table 1 Mean for Self-Eficacy
Statement
Mean
ESEQ 1 I believe I'll receive excellent grades in my classes.
3.8
ESEQ2 I'm certain I can understand the most difficult material presented in the readings.
3.5
ESEQ3 I'm confident I can learn the basic concepts that are being taught.
4
ESEQ4 I'm confident I can understand the most complex material presented by the instructor.
3.5
ESEQ5 I'm confident I can do an excellent job on assignments and tests.
4.1
ESEQ6 I expect to do well.
4.2
ESEQ7 I'm certain I can master the skills being taught.
3.7
ESEQ8 Considering the difficulty of the classes, the teachers, and my skills, I think I can do well.
4
Table 1 above shows the mean scores from eight statements under the self-efficacy section of the
questionnaire. Based on the table, statement number six received the highest mean score of 4.2 where the
respondents expected that they would do well in their courses. The second-highest mean score could be seen
from statement five, with a mean score of 4.1. The statement pointed out that students felt confident that they
could understand the most complex material by their instructor. Both statements three and eight recorded a
mean score of 4. Statement three highlighted that students were confident that they could learn the basic
Page 375
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
concepts that they were taught and statement eight on the other hand stated that respondents were able to do
well because of their teachers and personal skills although their classes were difficult. Next, the respondents
felt that they would receive excellent grades in their classes and that they could master skills taught to them
with a mean score of 3.8 and 3.7 respectively. Last but not least, both statements two and four received a total
mean score of 3.5 each. Respondents felt certain that they could understand the most difficult material
presented in their readings and that they were confident that they could understand the most complex material
presented by their instructor (statements two and four respectively).
Table 2 Mean for control of learning beliefs
Statement
Mean
ECBQ1 If I study in appropriate ways, then I'll be able to learn the material.
4.1
ECBQ2 It's my own fault if I don't learn the material taught.
4
ECBQ3 If I try hard enough, then I'll understand the material presented.
4.1
ECBQ4 If I don't understand the material presented, it's because I didn't try hard enough.
3.7
ECBQ 5 If I don't understand the online material, it's ultimately my responsibility.
3.8
Table 2 above shows the mean score for the five statements under the sub-heading control of learning beliefs
of the questionnaire. Both statements one and three recorded the same mean score of 4.1 Statement one
highlighted that if the respondents studied in appropriate ways, then they would be able to learn their material,
and statement three stated that if they tried hard enough, then they would be able to understand the material
presented to them. Next, the statement It’s my own fault if I don’t learn the material taught” received a mean
score of 4. Statement five recorded a mean score of 3.8, while statement four recorded a mean score of 3.7.
Statements five and four reflected the control of learning beliefs where they felt that it was their responsibility
if they did not understand the online material and that they did not try hard enough if they did not understand
the online materials presented to them by their instructors.
Findings for Personal Components
This section presents data to answer research question 2- How do learners perceive their personal components
in online learning? In the context of this study, this is presented as Value and is measured by (i) intrinsic goal
orientation, (ii) extrinsic goal orientation and (iii) task value.
Table 3 Mean for Intrinsic Goal Orientation
Mean
3.7
3.7
4
3.8
4.2
Table 3 highlights intrinsic motivation, showing that most students find satisfaction in self-directed learning.
The highest mean (4.2) for “I am motivated to learn, even when I am working on an assignment on my own”
suggests that students are generally confident in their ability to manage independent learning (Rahmat et al.,
2021). However, moderate scores (3.7) for statements on curiosity-driven learning indicate that while students
value engaging content, some struggle with motivation when materials are too challenging. This suggests that
Page 376
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
simply providing content is not enoughcourses need to incorporate interactive, problem-solving elements to
sustain interest and motivation.
Table 4 Mean for Extrinsic Goal Orientation
Statement
Mean
VEQ1Getting a good grade is the most satisfying thing for me.
4.7
VEQ2The most important thing for me is to improve my overall grade point average, so
my concern is getting a good grade.
4.4
VEQ3I want to get better grades than most of the other students in my classes.
4.3
VEQ4I want to do well in my classes because it's important to show my ability to my
family, friends, employer, or others.
4.4
VEQ5 I am motivated to excel in my studies to secure a well-paying job, promotions, and
financial stability.
4.6
Table 4 shows extrinsic motivation plays a major role in students’ learning attitudes. The highest mean (4.7)
for “Getting a good grade is the most satisfying thing for me” indicates that performance outcomes drive
engagement (Chung et al., 2020). Similarly, high scores (4.64.4) for career-oriented statements suggest
students view online learning as a stepping stone for professional advancement. While extrinsic motivation can
be effective, an overemphasis on grades and external rewards might reduce long-term interest in learning
(Stephani et al., 2023). A balanced approachwhere students see real-world applications of their learning
could help sustain engagement beyond just achieving high marks.
Table 5 Mean for Task Value
Statement
Mean
VTQ1I think I will be able to use what I learn in this course in other courses.
4.3
VTQ2It is important for me to learn the course material in this class.
4.4
VTQ3I am very interested in the content area of this course.
4.3
VTQ4I think the course material in this class is useful for me to learn.
4.5
VTQ5I like the subject matter of this course.
4.3
VTQ6Understanding the subject matter of this course is very important to me.
4.4
Table 5 focuses on task value, which measures how much students see their coursework as useful and relevant.
The highest mean (4.5) for “I think the course material in this class is useful for me to learn” confirms that
students generally perceive their studies as meaningful to their academic and career goals (Al Rawashdeh et
al., 2021). However, slightly lower scores (4.3) for interest in the subject matter suggest that while students see
value in their coursework, not all find it engaging. This raises an important pointcourse designers should
ensure learning is both practical and interesting, integrating real-world applications to make materials more
engaging.
Findings for Environment
This section presents data to answer research question 3- How do learners perceive their environment in online
learning? In the context of this study, the environment is presented in social support and is measured by (i)
social engagement and (ii) instructor support.
Page 377
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Table 6 Mean for Social Engagement
Statement
Mean
ISSEQ1 feel "disconnected" from my teacher and fellow students in classes.
2.
SSEQ2I pay attention in classes.
4.2
SSEQ3I enjoy class discussions.
4.2
SSEQ4I feel like I can freely communicate with other students in classes.
4.0
SSEQ5I have strong relationships with fellow students in this course.
3.7
Table 6 uncovers a key challenge—social isolation in online learning. The lowest mean (2.7) for I feel
disconnected from my teacher and fellow students” reinforces findings that lack of interaction is a major
barrier to motivation in digital learning (Meşe & Sevilen, 2021). However, higher scores (4.2 and 4.0) for
participation in discussions and peer communication suggest that students do engage when given the
opportunity. This implies the issue is not reluctance to interact but a lack of structured opportunities.
Encouraging more real-time interactions, collaborative projects, and peer discussions could help mitigate this
issue and improve motivation.
Table 7 Mean for Instructor Support
Statement
Mean
SISQ1I feel like I can freely communicate with the instructor in this class.
4.1
SISQ2The instructor responds to questions, clearly, completely, and in a timely
manner.
4.2
SISQ3The instructor’s expectations for me in this class are clear.
4.2
SISQ4The instructor provides the guidance I need to be successful in this class.
4.3
SISQ5 The instructor presents the material in a way that makes it relevant to me.
4.2
SISQ6 The instructor provides regular feedback that helps me gauge my
performance in this class.
4.2
Table 7 assesses instructor support, with consistently high scores (4.14.3), suggesting students feel generally
well-supported. The highest mean (4.3) for “The instructor provides the guidance I need to be successful”
highlights that students value clear instructions and structured guidance (Rahmat et al., 2021). However, while
feedback is appreciated, asynchronous communication still leaves some students feeling disconnected (Iftanti
et al., 2023). This suggests instructors should be more proactive in engaging with students through live Q&As,
personalized feedback, and interactive sessions, ensuring students feel consistently supported.
Findings for relationship between behaviour and personal components and environment in online
learning
This section addresses research question four: Is there a relationship between behaviour, personal components,
and environment in online learning? Correlation analysis using SPSS confirmed significant positive
associations among the three components. The analysis indicated a strong and significant relationship between
personal and behaviour components (r = .693, p = .000), demonstrating that students’ personal motivation is
closely linked with their behavioural engagement in online learning. Likewise, a strong positive relationship
was identified between environment and personal components (r = .635, p = .000), highlighting the extent to
which supportive learning environments influence learners’ motivation. In comparison, the association
between behaviour and environment components was moderate yet statistically significant (r = .384, p = .000),
suggesting that environmental factors have a moderate impact on behavioural engagement. According to
Jackson (2015), correlations between 0.5 and 1.0 are considered strong, while those ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 are
Page 378
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
moderate. These findings therefore confirm that all three constructs are significantly interrelated, with stronger
associations observed between personal and behaviour as well as between environment and personal
components.
Overall, the results demonstrate that behaviour, personal factors, and environment are significantly
interrelated, reflecting Bandura’s principle of triadic reciprocal causation, with personal factors exerting the
strongest influence by closely linking with both behavioural engagement and environmental support in online
learning.
DISCUSSIONS
The findings of this study align with existing research on motivation in online learning, particularly within the
framework of Bandura’s (1986) Cognitive Social Learning Theory and Fowler’s (2018) Online Learning
Motivation model. The results indicate that students demonstrate strong self-efficacy and control of learning
beliefs, reinforcing past studies that suggest self-regulated learners tend to perform better in online education
(Rahmat et al., 2021). The study also supports the notion that students with higher confidence in their abilities
are more likely to engage with course materials actively and persist through academic challenges (Chung et al.,
2020). However, consistent with Meşe & Sevilen’s (2021) study, some students still struggle with
understanding complex materials, highlighting the need for better instructional design and additional support
mechanisms to sustain motivation in online learning environments.
The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in online learning is evident in the study’s findings, aligning with
Fowler’s (2018) model, which emphasizes expectancy, value, and social support as key determinants of
motivation. Students reported a strong task value, recognizing the importance of learning materials for their
academic and career growth, a finding consistent with Al Rawashdeh et al. (2021), who noted that students
who perceive their courses as relevant tend to remain motivated. Additionally, the results reflect the impact of
extrinsic motivators, such as achieving high grades and securing future employment, which is in line with
Stephani et al. (2023), who found that career prospects play a significant role in students' commitment to
online learning. This balance between intrinsic curiosity and extrinsic rewards suggests that online course
design should incorporate both engaging content and clear career-related outcomes to maintain student
motivation.
The study also highlights the importance of social engagement and instructor support, further supporting the
argument that online learning motivation is not solely dependent on individual factors but also on
environmental influences (Bandura, 1986). While students generally reported a sense of engagement, some
expressed feelings of disconnection, a challenge widely recognized in previous studies (Meşe & Sevilen, 2021;
Iftanti et al., 2023). However, the strong correlation between instructor support and motivation in this study
aligns with Rahmat et al. (2021), who emphasized that clear guidance, timely feedback, and meaningful
interactions with instructors help mitigate feelings of isolation and improve motivation. These findings
reinforce the need for interactive course structures, collaborative learning opportunities, and proactive
instructor engagement to enhance students’ overall learning experiences and sustain motivation in online
education.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study have significant pedagogical implications for designing and implementing effective
online learning environments. Given that self-efficacy and control of learning beliefs play a crucial role in
sustaining motivation, educators should incorporate structured learning strategies that promote self-regulation,
goal-setting, and continuous feedback to enhance students’ confidence in their learning abilities. Additionally,
since both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation influence students’ engagement, course content should be
designed to balance academic rigor with practical applications, ensuring that students see the relevance of their
learning to future career opportunities. The study also highlights the importance of social engagement and
instructor support, reinforcing the need for interactive learning activities, peer collaboration, and timely
instructor feedback to mitigate feelings of disconnection in online settings.
Page 379
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXIV October 2025
Future research should explore how different instructional strategies and technological tools (e.g.,
gamification, discussion forums, and AI-driven personalized learning) can further enhance motivation and
engagement in online learning. Additionally, more studies could examine discipline-specific motivation
factors, particularly in fields that require hands-on, practical learning experiences, to ensure that online
education meets the diverse needs of students across academic disciplines.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
You can dedicate this section to give recognition and acknowledgement to those involved in your project
REFERENCES
1. APA 7
th
Edition, arrange them in alphabetical order
2. Alfarimba, R., Ardianti, S. D., & Khamdun, K. (2021). The Impact of online learning on the learning
motivation of primary school students. Progres Pendidikan, 2(2), 9499.
https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v2i2.146
3. Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., et al., 2021. Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university
education: Analyzing Students’ Perspectives. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(2), pp. 107-117.
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
5. Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Vloreen Nity Mathew. (2020). Are you ready? An Assessment of Online
Learning Readiness among University Students. International Journal of Academic Research in
Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 301317. https://doi:10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i1/7128
6. Dung, D.T.H., (2020). The Advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. Journal of Research &
Method in Education (IOSR-JRME),10(3), 45-48. https://DOI: 10.9790/7388-1003054548
7. Fowler, S. (2018) The Motivation to learn Online Questionnaire. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation.
Graduate Faculty, The University of Georgia. Retrieved from
https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf
8. Iftanti, E., Imelda, & Yunita, W. (2023). Uncovering EFL learners’ demotivation towards English online
learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1),
96-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25401
9. Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition)
Boston, USA: Cengage Learning.
10. Meşe, E. & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A
Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.
http://dergipark.org.tr/jetol
11. Rahmat, N. H. ., Sukimin, I. S. ., Sim, M. S. ., Anuar, M. ., & Mohandas, E. S. (2021). Online Learning
Motivation and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Undergraduates vs Postgraduates. International Journal of
Asian Social Science, 11(2), 8897. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.112.88.97
12. Sadeghi, M., (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and Limitations.
International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88.
https://ijreeonline.com/files/site1/user_files_68bcd6/sadeghi92-A-10-156-1-48ab29c.pdf
13. Stephani, N., Alvin, S., & Riatun. (2023). Exploring college students’ motivations for choosing online
learning program. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2266206