Previous studies on compliance and maximal non -compliance. Indirawati Zahid and Muhammad Nasri Safe
(2022) analyzed the adherence and adherence of the maximum conversation in podcast health interviews. This
qualitative study downloads, copies, and analyzes the text of the interview, finds compliance with all the
maxims, but the non -compliance with the maximum quantity and the way exists. Interestingly, certain non -
compliance does not affect communication, but helps the topic explanation (Zahid & Safe, 2022; Buhari et al.,
2023; Beden, 2019). A study by Indirawati Zahid (2018) on TV3's "Question" show shows that the moderator
complies with all maxims, while the invitation panel violates the maxim of quantity and methods to clarify
economic issues. The design of this study involved analysis of transcripts and observations of two moderators
and two economic observers. The findings show that maximal non -compliance is sometimes strategic to
achieve communication objectives (Zahid, 2018; Buhari et al., 2023; Beden, 2019).
Application of the theory of Leech's politeness principles in the maxim analysis of politeness Beden (2019)
applies the principle of decency of Leech (1983) with the Grice and Asmah Omar model to analyze the
strategies for writing the Language Council magazine. This qualitative study analyzes selected texts and found
compliance with maximum wisdom, support, and humility forming effective strategy combination patterns.
This finding shows that Leech Theory is relevant not only in verbal communication, but also in formal writing
(Beden, 2019; Buhari et al., 2023; Claudia et al., 2018). A study by Claudia et al. (2018) against the drama of
the "Toilet Gang" drama uses a qualitative descriptive design to identify the maximum decency in the
dialogue. The sample consists of the full script of the drama, analyzed by six LEECH maxims. The findings
show that the maximum agreement, generosity, and the dominant sympathy, proves the effectiveness of this
theory in analyzing creative works. The challenge identified is the maximum interpretation of the subjective
depends on the cultural context (Claudia et al., 2018; Beden, 2019; Buhari et al., 2023). Overall, the discussion
of previous studies shows a consistent relationship between language proficiency, maximal compliance, and
the effectiveness of message delivery, whether on social media, face -to -face communication, or even
preaching plans. The pattern that shows that the drill works not only to maintain the harmony of the
interaction, but also to increase the credibility of the speaker. However, key challenges include the tendency to
violate maxims in certain situations, whether intentionally to emphasize arguments or the lack of awareness of
language implications. From a research point of view, there is a systematic application of the theory to the
context of television preaching, especially that combines discourse analysis with observation of broadcasting
situations. This gap opens up space for a more in -depth and interdisciplinary study.
METHODOLOGY
This study employed a qualitative research design to investigate the application of Leech’s (1983) Politeness
Principle in the Halaqah program. A qualitative approach was chosen as it provides a systematic and
contextualized understanding of linguistic behavior, allowing for in-depth exploration of how maxims are
enacted in religious discourse (Lexy, 2007).
Purposive sampling was applied to select three episodes of Halaqah as the study sample, representing a
population comprising all episodes of the program. The chosen episodes fulfilled specific criteria aligned with
the study’s objectives, ensuring relevance and richness of data. This approach enabled focused analysis of
speech events in which politeness strategies were likely to emerge prominently.
Data were collected through video recordings of the selected episodes, which were transcribed verbatim to
capture linguistic features accurately. Every utterance was documented to ensure completeness of the dataset
and minimize the risk of omitting subtle politeness markers.
The transcripts were analyzed using content analysis guided by the six maxims of Leech’s Politeness Principle:
wisdom, generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, and sympathy. Each utterance was coded for adherence
or non-adherence to these maxims. The analysis focused not only on identifying instances of compliance but
also on examining strategic violations and their communicative purposes.