representing sustainable solutions to PBG to support students. These innovations tie in with global trends in
nature-based approaches to therapy and therapeutic spaces which have become increasingly prevalent in
campus level well-being strategy (Ribeiro et al., 2024).
In the end, this research demonstrates that by strategically engaging in botanical gardens, students can practice
self-care, develop resilience, and enhance cognitive functioning. By utilizing smart technologies, developing
sustainable practice and implementing inclusive programming, PBG might transform into a living laboratory
for student learning and well-being and a template for urban universities globally to follow and grow.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the respondents, who were among the visitors, for
their valuable insights and perspectives, which significantly contributed to the success of this research and its
findings.
REFERENCES
1. Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2008). The prevalence and socio-demographic correlations of depression, anxiety
and stress among a group of university students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(8),
667–672.
2. Chen, G., & Sun, W. (2018). The role of botanical gardens in scientific research, conservation, and citizen
science. Plant Diversity, 40(4), 181–188.
3. Delbert, T., Stepansky, K., Bucey, J. C., & Goodman-Schiller, D. (2024). Growing sustainable therapeutic
third spaces – a therapeutic sensory garden’s impact on university student self-reported quality of life and
affect. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.
4. Goh, H. C., & Mahmood, N. (2016). The user’s perceptions of Perdana Botanical Garden in Kuala Lumpur.
Journal of Design and Built Environment, 16–16(1), 27–28.
5. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., Frumkin, H., & Annual Reviews. (2014). Nature and Health. Sci. Adv.
6. Lee, A. C. K., & Maheswaran, R. (2010). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the
evidence. Journal of Public Health, 33(2), 212–222.
7. Maas, J., Van Dillen, S. M., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2008). Social contacts as a possible
mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15(2), 586–595.
8. Misra, R. & West Virginia University. (2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their
anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies.
9. Nguyen, P.-Y., 1, Astell-Burt, T., 2, Rahimi-Ardabili, H., 1, & Feng, X., 1. (2021). Green Space Quality and
Health: A Systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
10. Ribeiro, H., Valente De Souza Santana, K., Lizarralde Oliver, S., & Preprints.org. (2024). Natural
Environments in University Campuses and Students’ Well-being. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health.
11. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery
during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 201–230.
12. Van Den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2010). Green space as a buffer
between stressful life events and health. Social Science & Medicine, 70(8), 1203–1210.
13. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice:
The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough.’ Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.
14. Zhang, J., Jin, J., & Liang, Y. (2024). The impact of green space on university students’ mental health: the
mediating roles of solitude competence and perceptual restoration. Sustainability, 16(2), 707.