As guided writing is commonly related to using graphic organisation and templates, there are certain formats
that should be followed by the students. Another contribution to the challenges is the inability to structure and
organise their ideas and writing naturally according to the organisation template. In a study by Borang &
Gupta (2025), the coherence, cohesion, logical sequencing, appropriate paragraphing development and the use
of transition devices are the critical barriers to effective guided writing. With the formal writing being
introduced, students tend to limit their style of writing and thinking. Instead, they relied on memorisation of
the production of ideas rather than engaging with critical writing. Overall, the studies offer meaningful insights
into the challenges faced by the ESL students in guided writing with suggested pedagogical theories and
strategies in addressing them. It is important for both educators and students to be practical and brave to apply
the various styles of adapting the learning paths. As suggested by (Selvaraj & Aziz, 2019) writing goes beyond
the school scope for the ESL students to master the language.
The Use of Self-Assessment as a Tool for Guided Writing
In general, the process of engaging students in effective self-assessment underlies three principles, as proposed
by Andrade and Valtcheva (2009) which involve; (1) the articulation of expectations, (2) self-assessing, (3)
revising. In writing context, these steps involve first with the clear expectations set by the educators on what
the task is all about and how will it be done. Educators can also describe each criterion in the self-assessment
that will be used by the students. As supported by Hafizuddin & Razali (2019), reaching towards an agreement
with the educators on the criterion for the task will make a quality work to be produced. For example, in
language teaching for guided writing, the process starts with educators sharing on the importance of the task,
the types of writing elements, the division of marks involved, and this should be discussed before the students
started their guided writing. Then, the step moves to the production of an outline, brainstorming and generating
ideas of the selected topic with continual monitoring on the progress of their writing by making improvement
from time to time. At this stage, students are often to be found struggling because they have limited language
vocabulary, difficulties in expressing their ideas and thoughts on paper and are too cautious of making
mistakes related to sentence structures.
The next step involves students to produce their drafts of the writing task given and continually monitor their
progress by making comparisons and improvements from their previous writing. As suggested by Andrade &
Valtcheva, (2009), students can write their own notes to make them aware of the changes made for their final
drafts. Through this self-assessing process, students will be able to see their writing improvements in terms of
idea generations, language and punctuations. This step emphasizes the independent learning and thus makes
the process be meaningful for them. In addition, the third step of involves the self-assessment feedback to be
used as revision for the students.
In a study by Harris (1997), he suggested that teacher can compile the common mistakes made by students in
guided writing process and produce a checklist for self-editing so that students can refer and revise their work.
In another study, the use of self-assessment is found to show improvements across various aspects of the
writing skill which include content, language and organisation for the required task (Ghazala & Hayah, 2024).
However, Fristiara, Sumardi & Drajati (2018) supported that the process of self-assessing their own writing
task, the repetition of reviewing and amending the writing task has made the students to be more careful and
develop positive attitudes of improving the task. However, they argued that grammar errors can be identified
by using the self-assessment without the supervision from the educators.
Research indicates that with self-assessment in writing, students can concentrate on their education better, able
to track their development and look for methods to modify and enhance their ability (Eswaey & Ihmoumah,
2024). The researchers also highlighted this tool has great potential to nurture learner autonomy and foster self-
regulation. It is believed that when students involve in the self-assessment process, they need to make
judgement for their own work whether they are right or wrong, valid or reliable. Therefore, this process needs
active participation among students rather than just being passive and receive the information.
Therefore, the concern of making students to involve directly in their learning process has gained attention and
interest among educators to apply self-assessment. Litz (2009) found that students can push themselves to
finish their writing task based on the expected schedule. The clear expectations as mentioned above on the