managing and reducing students’ language anxiety. Third, the language tasks of ELA reposition students as
active and autonomous agents in their language development by affording them an avenue to design their
responses and make choices about task execution. Fourth, ELA, which is pioneered within a military higher
education institution, is contextually superior and unique as it is one of the first innovations in language
learning that targets learners in high-stress, and highly disciplined environments.
The ELA framework holds significant commercial potential in both education technology and language
teaching markets. As a way forward, ELA will be developed into a modular CEFR-Aligned Teaching Toolkit
comprising CEFR-based ELA modules, task sheets, teacher guidelines, rubrics, student progress trackers, and
anxiety monitoring tools. Additionally, this innovation will be transferred into a mobile application that offers
interactive beyond-the-classroom language learning tasks, reflection journals, self- assessment features, and
digital badges that are aligned with CEFR competencies. In addition, apart from providing a platform for
students to enhance their communication skills and language confidence using English, the mobile app also
integrates principles of mental wellness and self-efficacy, making it a powerful pedagogical tool for alleviating
language anxiety.
To conclude, the empirical findings of this research highlight ELA as a learner-centred innovation that
responds to the growing demand for more flexible, empathetic, and technology-enabled English language
learning frameworks. Its novel integration of CEFR constructs and principles, emotional resilience, and digital
adaptability creates significant opportunities for upscaling and commercialisation. The innovation is not only
relevant in academic settings but also has the potential for cross-sectoral applications in lifelong learning,
workforce training, and international education.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research is part of the outcomes of a self-funded grant supported by the Research Management Centre,
National Defence University of Malaysia (Grant No. SF0154-UPNM/2024/SF/SSI/1).
REFERENCES
1. Bakar, E.W., Satwant Singh, S.K., & Abdul Nasir, A.Q. (2024). ELA – Learning English and beyond
[Conceptual Framework]. University Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia. Registered copyright: MyIPO,
Registration No. CRLY2024W00858.
2. Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In
Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7-16). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
3. Council of Europe. 2018. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching,
Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companionvolume-with-new- descriptors-2018/1680787989.
4. Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language teaching, 43(2), 154-167.
5. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern
language journal, 70(2), 125-132.
6. Jin, Y., Zhang, L. J., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2020). Contracting students for the reduction of foreign language
classroom anxiety: An approach nurturing positive mindsets and behaviours. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,
1471.
7. Lee, H., Jin, S., & Lee, J. H. (2023). Ending the cycle of anxiety in language learning: A non-recursive path
analysis approach. System, 118, 103154.
8. Lee, K., & Ye, Y. (2023). Investigating the reliability of foreign language classroom anxiety scale (FLCAS):
An application of generalizability theory. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 100036.
9. Satwant Singh,S.K., Bakar, E.W., Abdul Nasir, A.Q. (2025). Instructors’ Perspectives on English Language
Activities (ELA); An Autonomous Communicative English Language Learning Approach for higher
learning. International Journal of Modern Education (IJMOE), 7(24). 174-190.
https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.724012