
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Lack of Emotional / Natural
Expression
S22: “…difficult to understand because of the tone sounds unnatural and it lacks
emotions.”
S23: “AI didn’t… pick up subtle cues like hesitation, sarcasm, or passive-
aggressiveness.”
S13: “its maybe speak fast.”
S22: “…sometimes the AI talks too fast or uses words I don’t know.”
S43: “The speed level is very high may be difficult to some listeners.”
Content Accuracy / Quality
S4: “AI-generated listening tools have errors sometimes.”
S41: “Accuracy Issues: AI may misinterpret accents, slang, or technical terms.”
S54: “misinformation.”
Accessibility / Cost Barriers
S17: “Must have strong Network connection.”
S30: “need to purchase the pro.”
S5: “Nothing.”
S40: “I think it’s nothing.”
S48: “so far I didn’t face any of it.”
The findings show that the AI-Driven Listening Hub offers innovative opportunities for ESL listening practice,
but learners also reported two main types of challenges. The first are technical issues, such as unstable internet
connections, lagging systems, and subscription costs. The second are linguistic issues, including robotic or
unclear pronunciation, unnatural accents, lack of emotion, and fast speech. These limitations are consistent
with earlier studies that highlight weaknesses in speech synthesis, particularly in prosody and cultural nuance
(Choi, 2022; Kang et al., 2009). At the same time, some learners indicated that they faced no difficulties,
suggesting that AI-generated materials can work well for students with strong internet access or those more
adaptable to synthetic voices. This shows that while AI-based tools are useful, learners value the authenticity
of human voices, especially the natural rhythm, intonation, and emotional expression that support deeper
listening comprehension (Susilo, 2023; Nainggolan & Hanifah, 2024). Overall, the results suggest that AI
listening tools should be used as a complement rather than a replacement for traditional resources. A blended
approach would balance the accessibility and flexibility of AI with the authenticity and cultural richness of
human-based listening practices (Back & Kabulis, 2025; Jung, 2025).
NOVELTY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The novelty of this innovation lies in its dual adaptability and inclusivity. Unlike static commercial resources,
the hub empowers educators to create dynamic, script-based listening materials tailored to learners’
proficiency levels. It integrates two key AI functionalities which are ChatGPT for generating authentic,
context-rich scripts and TTS for producing natural-sounding audio resources This AI-Driven Listening Hub
provides learners with scaffolding, learner autonomy as well as cost-effective access to listening practices. The
hub is also accessible through mobile phones in which it provides convenience to the learners. Future research
should examine how blending AI-generated content with human-delivered listening practices can maximise
authenticity and pedagogical impact (Wang & Vasquez, 2023). It is recommended that the project undergo
pilot testing within a higher education setting to validate its effectiveness. Furthermore, continuous refinement
should be pursued through feedback loops involving educators and learners. Future developments may explore
multilingual expansions, integration with mobile learning applications, and incorporation of analytics features
to track learner progress. Last but not least, this listening hub can be expanded to include diverse ESL
populations as well as the tracking to learners’ progress.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to extend their deepest appreciation to the Akademi Pengajian Bahasa (APB),
Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Kedah Branch, for their continuous support and encouragement
throughout the development of this project. Sincere thanks are also extended to the students involved in the