ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 311
www.rsisinternational.org
Senostik: Diagnostic Insights for Smarter Education
1
Susyam Widiantho, *
2
Zaamah Mohd Nor,
3
Sumasno Hadi,
4
Widiya Aris Radiani,
5
Nor Fadzleen Sa’don
1
Universitas Negeri Samarang, Indonesia,
2
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia,
3
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia,
4
UIN Antasari Banjarmasin,
5
English Language Teaching Centre, Ministry of Education Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.925ILEIID000056
Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 06 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Senostik is an Android-based diagnostic application developed to support an evidence-driven, student-centred
approach in Indonesian schools. Despite the Merdeka Curriculum highlighting diagnostic assessment as a
foundation for teaching and learning, many schools still struggle to implement it due to teachers’ limited
understanding, time constraints, and lack of accessible tools. This gap has created a pressing need for a
scalable and validated digital platform that simplifies the diagnostic process while ensuring data accuracy.
Using a Research and Development (R&D) approach grounded in educational diagnostic and data-driven
decision-making frameworks, Senostik integrates cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions to measure students’
readiness and learning characteristics. The validity and reliability of its instruments were established through
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Cronbach’s Alpha. Field trials conducted across more than 1,000
schools confirmed its usability, affordability, and scalability. Findings show that Senostik provides teachers and
counsellors with clear, actionable diagnostic reports that enhance lesson planning and counselling decisions. In
doing so, it bridges the gap between educational psychology and digital technology, advancing Indonesia’s
digital education agenda and setting a model for evidence-based assessment in the region.
Keywords: diagnostic, application, cognitive, non-cognitive, digital education
INTRODUCTION
Education is the cornerstone of the successful implementation of Indonesia’s vision, Indonesia Emas 2045,
which involves developing superior human resources through fair and quality education (Purnawanto, 2022).
This vision aligns with the mission of producing Pancasila Siswa, students who are critical and creative
thinkers, independent and collaborative, and global-minded. Within the Merdeka Curriculum, diagnostic
assessment is highlighted as the foundation for planning curriculum, teaching, and guidance services
(Kemendikbud, 2020). Bimbingan & Kaunseling (BK) or guidance and counselling teachers play a strategic
role in mapping the strengths, weaknesses, and socio-emotional conditions of students to provide differentiated
learning that is timely and appropriate for each learner in school (Nuraini et al., 2022).
Diagnostic assessment is an important stage in preparing differentiated learning under the Merdeka
Curriculum. It determines students' characteristics, initial competencies, strengths, and weaknesses in learning
strategies. Accurate education plans are possible when teachers ensure that teaching materials are matched with
students' abilities (Maryani et al., 2023).
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 312
www.rsisinternational.org
Diagnostic assessments help students organise themselves into groups based on their abilities, interests, and
learning styles. This means that different content learning strategies can be adopted for diverse groups of
students, yielding significant learning effects (Susanti, 2025).
Responding to these educational shifts, Senostik was developed as a digital innovation to operationalise
diagnostic assessment through technology. The application bridges policy aspirations with classroom realities,
providing a validated and user-friendly tool that enables teachers to collect accurate, real-time data for
evidence-based instructional planning.
Problem Statement
The insufficient inclusion of diagnostic assessment in schools has been one of the hurdles to educational
advancement. Many schools in Indonesia are having difficulty with diagnostic assessments that are aligned
with the Merdeka Curriculum. Conventional approaches, such as paper-based testing, manual scoring, and
expensive external psychometric services, are inefficient, error-prone, and often inaccessible for large groups
of students (Nuraini et al., 2022; Wahyuningsih, 2022).
A survey found that only 45.45% of teachers had ever conducted diagnostic assessments. The percentage of
teachers who did not understand the process at all was 40.91%, while 77.27% claimed they had never received
any guidance and/or training for diagnostic assessments (Sanjaya et al., 2023). This is supported by Anggrayni
et al. (2023), who related the lack of implementation of diagnostic assessments in schools to teachers’ lack of
understanding and training about them. Although the policy has been issued, diagnostic assessment processes
should constantly be revised. In particular, this involves raising teachers' overall level of understanding and
teaching them about how diagnostic assessments can help students' learning (Rakhmi et al., 2023).
It is challenging for teachers to allocate time to design and implement comprehensive assessments due to
heavy teaching loads; approximately 70.83% of teachers experience time constraints in conducting diagnostic
assessments (Yusyfia et al., 2025). Teachers also feel trapped in teaching methods that are not in line with the
Merdeka Curriculum diagnostic assessment because they do not receive training, socialisation, and support
from the government and educational institutions (Nur Fadhilah et al., 2023).
An investigation based on questionnaires and governmental reports indicates that the difficulties in
implementing diagnostic assessments under the Merdeka Curriculum are mainly related to the lack of
understanding, training opportunities, time and facilities. Compared with the past, teachers have placed much
more emphasis on the diagnosis of learning problems. To ensure the success of diagnostic assessments and
their positive impact on learning, teachers' ability and support materials must be improved (Oryandarini &
Munir, 2024).
Without systematic data on whether learners are ready to learn, what their interests are, or how they are faring
as individuals, instructions are likely to disregard individual needs. A scalable innovation, optimising validated
instruments and easy technology, is necessary to enable schools to plan and deliver guided or evidence-based
teaching. Senostik was thus developed in response to this void, providing a user-friendly and evidence-based
diagnostic tool, suitable and accessible to a wider educational audience.
Objectives
The main objectives of Senostik include:
1. To make the diagnostic assessment easier and digital-based for teachers and schools.
2. To obtain accurate and reliable information concerning cognitive (verbal, numerical, spatial abilities)
and non-cognitive (learning styles, psychological and social conditions, family support, study habits,
learning interest) characteristics of students.
3. To create a more personalised lesson planning and evidence-based interventions.
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 313
www.rsisinternational.org
4. To facilitate the coordination between teachers, counsellors, and parents by offering practical advice
using diagnostic results.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION & METHODOLOGY
Senostik is an Android application built using open-source technologies: Flutter 3.0, PHP for the user interface,
MySQL for database management, Firebase, Laravel 9.0, and FPDF for creating PDF reports available for
download (Nuraini et al., 2022). It even performs well on some older Androids. The step-by-step guides for
using the app are shown in Figure 1 (Senostik Usage Flowchart).
The application combines three fundamental assessment types:
1. Preliminary Assessment, in which the readiness before instruction is identified.
2. Process Assessment, for tracking progress and offering formative feedback during learning.
3. Interest and Academic/Career Exploration, to help learners choose appropriate subjects, pathways, and
career paths.
The tests were mediated by psychologists to maintain the validity and reliability of the results. Cognitive
questions were adapted from the Intelligence Structure Test (Winarti, 1998), while non-cognitive ones were
developed by psychologists to reflect socio-emotional well-being in the Merdeka Curriculum.
The methodology is grounded in Educational Diagnostic Theory and Data-Driven Decision-Making (DDDM)
frameworks, which posit that effective teaching stems from systematic identification of learner characteristics
and the application of empirical data to guide instruction (Bejar, 1982; Davis, 2024; Shamsuddin & Razak,
2023). These theoretical foundations justify the use of diagnostic instruments and iterative validation
processes, reinforcing the educational value of Senostik.
Using a Research and Development (R&D) process, construct validity was tested by Exploratory Factor
Analysis (EFA), and reliability was ensured by Cronbach’s Alpha, indicating satisfactory psychometric quality.
The trials involved junior and senior secondary schools to ascertain suitability for a wide range of student
samples. The app generates reports both on the student and group level (including suggestions for teachers and
counsellors to offer focused assistance to students).
Figure 1. Senostik Usage Flowchart
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 314
www.rsisinternational.org
To measure students' competencies comprehensively and avoid excessive fatigue, this assessment is designed
with a proportional number of questions and adjusted to the level of difficulty and assessment objectives. At
the beginning of the assessment, information about the number of questions and the estimated time required is
provided, allowing students to strategise and prepare for the test. Thus, prior to implementation, users of the
assessment can assess the level of assessment load.
All students' personal data collected during the assessment is stored in encrypted form and can only be
accessed by authorised parties to ensure data security and privacy. Without written consent from the school or
student guardian, data may not be shared with third parties. To prevent data misuse, participants' identities will
be anonymised during the assessment results analysis process. This mechanism is designed to keep all student
data secure in accordance with applicable data protection principles.
POTENTIAL FINDINGS AND COMMERCIALISATION
Field trials demonstrated that Senostik simplifies assessment procedures and provides clear, actionable reports
(Nuraini et al., 2022). Validation studies confirmed Senostik’s capability to produce valid and reliable
diagnostic data in accordance with the education standards for assessment. Its affordability and compatibility
with older devices allow adoption by resource-limited schools. Its pedagogical potential is its low cost and
flexibility to be integrated into various school environments, fitting with Indonesia’s digital education agenda.
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 315
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 2. Senostik’s Expansion Across Indonesia
Currently, Senostik has been adopted by 1,459 schools across 22 provinces in Indonesia, serving a total of
115,648 students. The platform has facilitated 1,728 diagnostic assessments, with the highest concentration of
users in South Kalimantan, followed by Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, and other regions across the
archipelago (Senostik's Database, September 2025), demonstrating its scale and practical acceptance.
The development and utilisation of Senostik in other Southeast Asian countries grappling with the same issues
in diagnostic testing and learner profiling can also be explored. Its inclusion of both individual, group, and
school-wide representations of data allows for a level of policy decision-making that is unparalleled.
Senostik is designed to function as an innovative digital education product and diagnostic assessment tool.
With a Software as a Service (SaaS) business model, schools, educational institutions, and local governments
can subscribe to Senostik services on a regular basis. Feature updates, automatic data analysis, and ongoing
technical support are made possible by this scheme to maintain service quality and ensure revenue
sustainability.
To increase its reach, Senostik can work strategically with the government, particularly in programmes to
improve the quality of education and early detection of learning difficulties. This collaboration may include
integration into the national curriculum or assessment, national licensing, and joint funding for the
development of features tailored to regional needs. In addition, to support the dissemination and training of
Senostik use in various educational institutions, collaborations will be developed with private parties such as
educational technology (edtech) companies and teacher training institutions.
NOVELTY
Unveiled for the first time in Banjarmasin, Indonesia, the novelty of Senostik is rooted in its pioneer
combination of expert-validated psychological measures and user-friendly digital technology. In contrast to
traditional paper-based tests or tests that must be conducted by an on-site psychologist, the Senostik automated
process issues a digital report, either for one individual or in summary for a group. These reports offer
pragmatic guidelines for teachers and counsellors that can be easily incorporated into classroom instructions.
CONCLUSION
Senostik achieves its objectives of simplifying diagnostic assessment, producing accurate and reliable data on
students’ cognitive and non-cognitive characteristics, and supporting evidence-based teaching and counselling.
Validation through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Cronbach’s Alpha confirms the tool’s psychometric
soundness, while field implementation across Indonesia demonstrates its usability, affordability, and
scalability.
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 316
www.rsisinternational.org
The application’s integration of psychological assessment principles with digital technology positions it as an
innovative and practical solution to challenges faced under the Merdeka Curriculum. By providing teachers
and counsellors with timely, data-driven insights, Senostik contributes to the realisation of Profil Pelajar
Pancasila and advances Indonesia’s digital education agenda.
RECOMMENDATION
Future efforts should focus on strengthening national partnerships, expanding the item banks, and integrating
analytics for broader school and policy-level planning.
Senostik can expand to other Southeast Asian countries, such as Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines,
which face similar problems in mapping student learning difficulties. It can be promoted as a regional product
that assists in data-driven educational decision-making by adapting to local rules, languages, and cultures. This
expansion will not only increase market share, but also increase Senostik's social impact in improving
education in Southeast Asia.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Senostik began as a joint effort involving teachers, certified counsellors, software developers, and several
schools in Banjarmasin, Indonesia. We are especially thankful to SMA 13 Banjarmasin for their participation
in the pilot test, and to educational departments and educators across Indonesia for their support. A special
gratitude also goes to ILEIID and Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia, for
providing Senostik a platform for international recognition.
REFERENCES
1. Anggrayni, M., Amril, & Vilda Agustina. (2023). Pengembangan Asesmen Diagnostik Ipas Dalam
Kurikulum Merdeka Kelas Iv Sdn 01 Sitiung. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(2), 5812
5820. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i2.1375
2. Bejar, I. I. (1982). Educational Diagnostic Assessment: A Background Paper (ETS Research Report No.
RR‑82‑50). Educational Testing Service.
https://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/publications/report/1982/hwdq.html
3. Davis, C. J. (2024). First‑ and Second‑Grade Teachers’ Use of Data‑Driven Decision‑Making for Guided
Reading (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/15422/
4. Kemendikbud. (2020). Asesmen diagnostik (Unit modul asesmen) [PowerPoint slides]. https://cdn-
gbelajar.simpkb.id/s3/p3k/PPB/modul%20asesmen%20PPB/Sesi%201%20%20%20Asinkron%20-
%20Eksplorasi%20Konsep%20-%20B.%20Asesmen%20Diagnostik.pptx.pdf
5. Maryani, I., Hasanah, E., & Suyatno. (2023). Asesmen Diagnostik: Pendukung Pembelajaran
Berdiferensiasi pada Kurikulum Merdeka. K-Media.
6. Nur Fadhilah, F., Nakhwa, I., Ramdani Ahmad, F., & Kevin Ivansyach, R. (2023). Tantangan Dan
Rekomendasi Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Kurikulum Merdeka Untuk Optimalisasi Pendidikan Di
Indonesia. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 5(8), 110.
https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/triwikrama/article/view/7305
7. Nuraini, H., Radiani, W. A., & Istati, M. (2022). Asesmen diagnostik “Senostik” untuk layanan BK pada
Kurikulum Merdeka. Proceedings of the XXII National Convention and the 33rd International Seminar on
Guidance and Counseling.
8. Oryandarini, D., & Munir, M. (2024). Hambatan-Hambatan Yang Dihadapi Guru Dalam Implementasi
Kurikulum Merdeka Di Smk N 3 Yogyakarta Ob Stacles Faced By Teachers in the Implementation of the
Independent Curriculum At Smk N 3 Yogyakarta. 2(2), 3639.
9. Purnawanto, A. T. (2022). Perencanaan pembelajaran bermakna dan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal
of Pedagogy, 15(1), 120.
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Page 317
www.rsisinternational.org
10. Rakhmi, M. P., Utomo, A. P. Y., Putri, S. A. A. S., & Ghufron, W. (2023). Pemanfaatan Google Form dalam
Asesmen Diagnostik di SMA Negeri 11 Semarang. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education,
2(1), 115126.
11. Sanjaya, D. B., Sukadi, Handayani, D. A. P., & Wirabrata, D. G. F. (2023). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter
Melalui Asesmen Diagnostik Non-Kognitif Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 1 Baktiseraga Singaraja. 8, 733741.
12. Shamsuddin, F., & Razak, A. Z. A. (2023). Development of a Model for Data‑Driven Decision Making:
Critical Skills for School Leaders. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(12),
2614. https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/2614
13. Susanti, A. (2025). Asesmen Diagnostik Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada
Siswa Kelas IV SDN 64 Bengkulu Tengah Atika. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah
Dasar, 18(1), 6371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.. Asesmen
14. Winarti, S. (1998). Validasi, faktorisasi, dan standarisasi norma tes intelegensi IST (Masters thesis,
Universitas Gadjah Mada).
15. Wahyuningsih, S. (2022, July 16). Sambut tahun pelajaran baru, SMA Negeri 11 Pinrang terapkan asesmen
diagnostik sebagai wujud implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. http://man11pinrang.sch.id/2022/07/16
16. Yusyfia, S., Purnamasari, I., & Arisyanto, P. (2025). Pemetaan permasalahan guru dalam melaksanakan
asesmen diagnostik di sekolah dasar untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran di era kurikulum merdeka.
Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202525558