Page 318
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
A Comparative Visual Framework of Prophet Adams Narratives: The
Quran, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, and the Bible
1
Nurul Hidayah binti Arom,
2
Jamal Ahmed Bashier Badi,
*3
Nik Md. Saiful Azizi bin Nik Abdullah
1 2
International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC-IIUM), International Islamic
University Malaysia,
3
Kulliyyah of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.925ILEIID000057
Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 06 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This project introduces an innovative visual pedagogical framework entitled “Prophet Adam Across Religious
Texts”, which transforms dense qualitative comparisons of the Qur’an, Malay exegesis Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, and
the Bible into interactive infographic modules. The core innovation lies in reimagining a research project
conducted under the ISTAC-IIUM Research Grant, Isra’iliyyat in the Adamic Narrative: A Comparative
Analysis of the Bible and Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan”. By integrating multilingual sources (the Arabic Quran, Malay
tafsir, and English Bible) side by side, the framework enhances accessibility, fosters critical comparative
thinking, and equips educators with a low-cost, digitally friendly tool for teaching Islamic studies and
comparative religion. The project also highlighting how Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan integrates Isra’iliyyat narratives.
Key features of the framework include infographics on four central themes: (1) Creation of Prophet Adam and
Hawa, (2) God’s command and Forbidden Tree, (3) Temptation and Wrongdoing, and (4) Consequences. The
design can potentially be adapted for teaching slides or interactive digital formats in both classroom and online
platforms, subject to pilot testing and user feedback. The anticipated outcomes include making complex
theological discourse more accessible, stimulating critical thinking, fostering comparative insights between
Isra’iliyyat, the Qur’an, and the Bible, and enhancing student engagement through visual learning. Ultimately,
this project demonstrates how qualitative, library-based research can be innovatively re-envisioned as a
practical pedagogical design for diverse educational contexts.
Keywords: Prophet Adam, Qur’an, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, Bible, Isra’iliyyat, Intertextuality, Visual Pedagogy.
INTRODUCTION
The Qur’an, the holy scripture of Muslims, and the Bible, the sacred text of Christians, both narrate the
creation and life of Prophet Adam, though with distinct theological emphases. In the Qur’an, Adam is
portrayed as Allah’s khalifah on earth, forgiven after repentance, and guided with divine mercy. In contrast, the
Bible presents Adam’s disobedience as the root of original sin. The role of Qur’anic explanation and
interpretation started from Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, and continued with the Companions, the
Successors, and later scholars, eventually developing into the written tradition of tafsir (Qur’anic exegesis) (al-
Dhahabi, 2000). Beyond the Arab world, tafsir writings also flourished in the Malay Archipelago (Ibrahim,
2013; Ahmad, 2022).
One significant example is Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan by Shaykh Muhammad Sa’id bin ‘Umar (Ibrahim, Dakir &
Abdul Kadir, 2014). His work made valuable contributions in guiding Malay Muslims to understand the divine
message of the Qur’an, though it also incorporates additional narrative details including elements of
Isra’iliyyat (Yusuff, Haji-Othman, & Manaf, 2018). There are several ways in which Isra’iliyyat infiltrated
Malay tafsir works (Mohd Nor, 2024): (1) through popular tafsir books that cited Isra’iliyyat, such as Tafsir al-
Tabari and Tafsir Ibn Kathir; (2) through the influence of Islamic traders and scholars who spread Islam among
Page 319
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
the Malay people; and (3)through the acceptance of Isra’iliyyat by Malay scholars in their teachings and
preaching.
Isra’iliyyat narratives refer to stories and traditions of Jewish and Christian origin, with the Bible as their
sources, which entered the Qur’anic exegesis, particularly in narrations concerning the prophets of Allah
including
Prophet Adam (al-Dhahabi, 2000). Meanwhile, some scholars broaden the meaning of Isra’iliyyat to include
any unsourced or fabricated narratives, far from the original facts in Qur’anic and Prophetic teachings,
introduced by others or the enemies of Islam (Ibrahim, Dakir & Abdul Kadir, 2014; al-Khalidi, 2015). Muslim
scholars generally classify these narratives into three categories: (1) those consistent with the Qur’an and
Sunnah (accepted), (2) those that contradict both (rejected), and (3) those about which the Qur’an and Sunnah
remain silent (neither accepted nor rejected) (Ibn Taimiyyah, 1980; Abu Shahbah, 1988). Thus, tafsir writings
containing Isra’iliyyat should not be dismissed outright, but rather critically examined and clearly explained,
particularly stories related to prophets (Rozali & Lubis, 2022; Mohd Zabidi & Wan Abdullah, 2024; Arom, Nik
Abdullah, & Samsudin, 2025).
This study is situated between the three theoretical frameworks: (i) Isra’iliyyat studies, which critically
evaluate the presence of Judeo-Christian traditions in tafsir); (ii) intertextuality, which involves the
comparative reading between the Qur’an, tafsir, and the Bible; and (iii) visual pedagogy, which transforms
textual analysis into a visual pedagogical framework. Together, these frameworks provide the conceptual
grounding for developing a comparative visual framework of Prophet Adam’s narratives.
Problem Statement
While Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan has significantly shaped Malay Muslim understanding of the Qur’an, its inclusion of
Isra’iliyyat narratives raises critical questions. These additions often parallel Biblical accounts, which may blur
the distinction between Qur’anic perspectives and external traditions. However, no pedagogical tool currently
exists to clearly compare and evaluate these narratives for teaching and research purposes. This creates a gap
for educators and students in Islamic studies and comparative religion.
Objectives
1. To examine the Adamic narratives across Qur’an, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan (with Isra’iliyyat elements), and
the Bible.
2. To identify similarities, differences, and Isra’iliyyat influences in Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan.
3. To transform textual comparisons into a visual pedagogical framework
4. To provide an accessible teaching and learning tool for Islamic studies and comparative religion.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION & METHODOLOGY
Product Description: The main output is a comparative visual framework that maps Prophet Adam’s narratives
across the Qur’an, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, and the Bible. It integrates Arabic Qur’anic verses, Malay tafsir
interpretation, and Biblical texts in English into infographic framework, serving as an accessible and
multilingual pedagogical resource for students and researchers.
Methodology
This study adopts a qualitative, library-based research design using content analysis. Primary sources include
the Qur’an, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan (with relevant verses), and the Bible (Genesis 1-5). Secondary sources such as
theses, dissertations, journal articles, and scholarly works provided additional context. Coding categories
related to the narratives of Prophet Adam were developed inductively based on recurring motifs, and
translations were validated through cross-check with secondary references and intertextual studies. The results
were then transformed into a visual framework using Canva.
Page 320
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
POTENTIAL FINDINGS AND COMMERCIALISATION
Results on Comparison Between Scriptural Narratives
There are both similarities and differences between the three sources: the Qur’an, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, and the
Bible. Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan stands between the Qur’an and the Bible, as it serves primarily as Qur’anic
interpretations while also including narrative expansions that parallel Biblical stories. The shared motifs across
the three are: (1) The creation of Prophet Adam and Hawa, (2) God’s command and the Forbidden Tree, (3)
Temptation and wrongdoing, and (4) Consequences of disobedience. Despite these parallels, distinct emphases
emerge. The Qur’an focuses on Prophet Adam’s role as caliph on earth and underscores divine mercy through
the words of Adam’s repentance. Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan offers additional details concerning the stories of Prophet
Adam but blends them with Isra’iliyyat elements. The Bible, on the other hand, introduces the concept of
original sin due to Adam’s sin of disobedience to God, which later connects to Christian theology regarding
Jesus as the redeemer through sacrifice himself.
Potential Findings and Commercialisation
The study is expected to reveal both overlapping motifs and contrasting emphases in Adamic narratives across
the three sources. The visual framework will highlight how Isra’iliyyat shaped certain tafsir interpretations,
while clarifying theological distinctions between Qur’anic and Biblical accounts. The pedagogical framework
can potentially be adapted into teaching modules, workshops, and digital learning tools for higher education
institutions, Islamic schools, and interfaith studies programs. However, full commercialisation and large-scale
adoption will depend on pilot testing in the next stage, and user feedback among educators and students.
Figure 1 Prophet Adam across Religious Texts: A Visual Pedagogical Framework for Comparative Scriptural
Narratives
Page 321
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Table 1 Framework of Comparative Scriptural Narratives: The Qur’an, Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, and the Bible
Shared motifs
The Qur’an
Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan
The Bible (NRSV)
The Creation of
Prophet Adam and
Hawa
Prophet Adam from clay
(Qur’an 2:30-31; 15:26).
Adam was created as the first
human, Hawa was created
from him, and their
descendants were spread
forth from both (Qur’an 4:1)
Isra’iliyyat:
Adam was rolled before
Paradise for 40 years,
which caused the angels to
be amazed (Umar, 1971,
vol. 1, p. 13).
Hawa was created from
Adam’s left rib in Paradise
without he felt any pain
(Umar, 1971, vol. 1, p.
154).
Adam from dust of the ground
(Genesis 2:7).
Breath of life given by God into
his nostril (Genesis 2:7).
Eve was made from Adam’s rib
when he got a deep sleep
(Genesis 2:21-22).
God’s command and
the Forbidden Tree
Do not eat from one tree
(Qur’an 2:35; 7:19).
Otherwise, become
wrongdoers (Qur’an 7:19).
Isra’iliyyat:
Do not eat from wheat or
date tree (types of
forbidden tree) (Umar,
1971, vol. 1, p. 14).
Do not eat from the Tree of
Knowledge of Good & Evil.
Eating it will cause a death
(Genesis 2:16-17).
Temptation and
wrongdoing
Satan whispers: promise of
immortality or angelic state
(Qur’an 7:20).
Both deceived and disobey
until their nakedness were
exposed (Qur’an 7:22;
20:120).
They covered nakedness with
leaves from Paradise (Qur’an
7:22; 20:121).
Isra’iliyyat:
Serpent tempts Hawa first
to eat from forbidden tree,
and then she gave it to
Adam (Umar, 1971, vol. 2,
p. 60).
Covered their nakedness
with fig or banana leaves
(3 leaves for Adam and 5
leaves for Eve - linked to
burial shrouds) (Umar,
1971, vol. 2, p. 60).
Serpent tempts Eve:
immortality and be like a God,
knowing good and evil
(Genesis 3:4-5).
Eve gave the fruit to Adam
(Genesis 3:6).
Eyes were opened and they
realize their nakedness (Genesis
3:7).
Sewed fig leaves and made
loincloths for covering.
(Genesis 3:7).
Consequences of
disobedience
Prophet Adam's role as
caliph on earth (Qur’an
2:30).
Adam, Hawa & Satan were
expelled to earth (Qur’an
2:36).
Enmity between humans and
Satan (Qur’an 2:36).
Prophet Adam got the words
of repentance and divine
mercy (Qur’an 2:37).
Promise of divine guidance
(Qur’an 2:38).
Isra’iliyyat:
Adam: required to relieve
himself as a result of
eating the forbidden fruit
(Umar, 1971, vol. 2, p.
60).
Hawa: afflicted with
menstruation every month
(Umar, 1971, vol. 2, p.
60).
Serpent: cursed to crawl
on its belly and have its
head struck by humans
(Umar, 1971, vol. 2, p.
60).
Serpent: cursed, crawl on its
belly, eat dust, enmity with
woman’s offspring (Genesis
3:14-15).
Eve: pain in childbirth,
submission to husband (Genesis
3:16).
Adam: cursed ground, toil,
death by returning to dust
(Genesis 3:17-19).
Expelled from the garden of
Eden (Genesis 3:23).
NOVELTY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Novelty: This project produces first visual framework of Adam's narratives across three traditions: the Qur’an,
the selected Malay exegesis (Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan), and the Bible. It transforms dense textual comparisons into
clear infographic module. Besides, it also integrates Arabic Qur'an, Malay tafsir, and English Bible in one
Page 322
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
visual framework by using English as the intermediary language. This innovation provides low-cost, flexible,
and digital-friendly pedagogical tool.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Future studies should extend this comparative framework between the Qur’an, selected tafsir works from
classical or contemporary exegeses, and other variations of Bible translations to other prophetic narratives
(Nuh, Ibrahim, Musa, and Isa). Further research should also examine additional details, particularly the
influence of Isra’iliyyat, include a broader corpus of tafsir texts, and conduct piloting with students and
educators, collecting qualitative and quantitative feedback on usability of the framework, as well as examining
its effectiveness.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project is part of a research study funded under the ISTAC-IIUM Research Grant. The researchers
gratefully acknowledge the support of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC),
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM).
REFERENCES
1. The Qur’an. (n.d.) Quran.com. https://quran.com/
2. Abu Shahbah, M. (1988). Al-Isrāʼīlīyāt wa al-Mawduʿat fi Kutub al-Tafsir. Maktabah Al-Sunnah.
3. Ahmad, Nadzrah. (2022). Qur’anic Exegetical Activities in the Malay Archipelago: A Historical Overview.
Al-Shajarah: ISTAC Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 27(1), 101-121.
4. Al-Dhahabi, M. H. (2000). Al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun. Mesir: Maktabah Wahbah.
5. Al-Khalidi, S. A. F. (2015). Isrāʼīlīyyāt Muʿasirah. Damsyiq: Dar al-Qalam.
6. Arom, N. H., Nik Abdullah, N. M. S. A., Samsudin S. (2025). The Influence of Arabic Exegesis on
Isra’iliyyat Narratives of Prophet Adam in Malay Tafsir and Its Implications. International Journal of
Modern Education, 7(25), 472-482.
7. Ibn Taimiyyah, T. (1980). Muqaddimah Fi Usul al-Tafsir. Beirut: Dar Maktabah al-Hayah.
8. Ibrahim, M., Dakir, J. & Abdul Kadir, M. N. (2014). Pengenalan Tokoh-Tokoh dan Kitab Tafsir Melayu
Ulama Nusantara. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
9. Ibrahim, N. (2013). The Evolution of Quranic Interpretation Writings in Malaysia from the 17
th
to 21
st
Century. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(7), 1-10.
10. Mohd Nor, M. T. (2024, October 25). Pengaruh Israiliyyat di Alam Melayu. Sinar Harian.
https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/692983/sinar-islam/islam-sejagat/pengaruh-israiliyyat-di-alam-
melayu
11. Mohd Zabidi, A. Z. & Wan Abdullah, W. N. (2024). Kajian Tentang Kewujudan Isra’iliyyat di Alam Melayu
Sebelum Kemunnculan Tafsir al-Quran. UMRANInternational Journal of Islamic and Civilizational
Studies, 11(2), 5973.
12. Rozali, M. & Lubis, N. S. (2022). Israiliyat: Histori Eksistensi dan Tokoh. AL-KAFFAH, 10(2), 145-163.
13. Sulaiman, I. (1998). Israi'liyyat dalam Pengajian Tafsir dan Sunnah. Jurnal Usuluddin, 8, 1-12.
14. The Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Version. (1989). National Council of the Churches of Christ in the
U.S.A. https://www.bible.com/
15. Umar, M. S. (1971). Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan. Pulau Pinang: Maktabah wa Matba’ah Dar al-Ma’arif.
16. Yusuff, M. S. S., Haji-Othman, Y., & Manaf, M. R. A. (2018). The Source of Al-Israiliyyat Stories in Tafsir
Nur al-Ihsan: An Intertextuality Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Sciences, 8(4), 861870.