Page 39
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Artificial Intelligence for English for Specific Military Purposes: An
Adaptive Framework for UN Peacekeeping Missions
Unaiza Khudai
1
, Shanti Chandran Sandaran
2
, Marsha Lavania Manivannan
3
,
M. Rab Nawaz Shad
4
1 2 3
Language Academy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
(UTM), Johor Bahru, Malaysia
4
Army Education Corps, Pakistan
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.925ILEIID00009
Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 04 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into English for specific military purposes
(ESMP) training for Pakistan army personnel who are preparing for United Nations peacekeeping missions.
Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design with stratified random samples of officers (n = 30) and
troops (n = 30), the research examined perceptions of AI’s suitability for mission-oriented English training.
Quantitative results revealed that officers reported strong digital literacy (M = 4.53) and institutional
endorsement (M = 5.00), but low personal readiness (M = 3.43). In contrast, troops demonstrated moderate
digital literacy (M = 3.37) but higher motivation (M = 4.23) and strong support for compulsory AI-ESMP
training (M = 4.30). The qualitative findings reinforced these patterns: officers emphasized institutional policy,
infrastructural requirements, and security concerns, while troops regarded AI as flexible, motivational, and
practically useful. These findings confirm the feasibility of developing an AI-ESMP Adaptive Framework to
enhance communication, operational readiness, and multinational collaboration in peacekeeping environments.
Keywords: Generative AI; English for Specific Military Purposes; AI-ESMP Adaptive Framework; UN
Peacekeeping Missions
INTRODUCTION
English is widely acknowledged as the lingua franca of diplomacy, multinational collaboration, and United
Nations Peacekeeping Missions. For Pakistan, one of the largest troop-contributing countries, effective English
communication is critical for operational success. However, persistent challenges remain, as troops often rely
on general English training that does not fully address the mission-specific communicative demands of
peacekeeping, such as operational briefings and incident reporting. Research within English for Specific
Purposes (ESP) highlights the importance of tailoring language instruction to particular contexts. This is where
English for Specific Military Purposes (ESMP) becomes indispensable, strengthening peacekeeping readiness.
At the same time, Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are reshaping the delivery of language education
worldwide. Adaptive learning systems, real-time feedback, and generative AI simulations provide flexible,
learner-centered, and authentic language training opportunities. This study addresses the gap between the need
for tailored ESMP and the potential of AI by examining the perceptions of both officers and troops to propose
an AI-ESMP adaptive framework for future implementation.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant advantages in education, notably by supporting adaptive learning
pathways, delivering immediate feedback, and boosting student motivation. Specifically, AI-driven
personalization enhances learner autonomy (Woo & Choi, 2021), while Generative AI can effectively simulate
authentic scenarios (Ejaz & Jamil, 2024. However, alongside these benefits, researchers like Bannister et al.
(2023) emphasize the necessity of considering ethical and infrastructural challenges, including system
Page 40
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
reliability and data governance. Some of these aspects of concern can be cybersecurity failures, risk of leaking
on cognitive intelligence, communication weaknesses, and directly compromising tactical secrecy. Likewise,
weak data governance of sensitive personnel data threatens ethical assessment, eroding trust and fairness
within the military structure.
THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This study is grounded in three complementary theoretical perspectives that converge to inform the proposed
AI-ESMP Adaptive Framework. First, the theory of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), when applied to the
military domain, underlines that language instruction should be systematically tailored to meet the specific and
high-stakes communicative demands inherent in that context. Second, Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education
provides the pedagogical affordances necessary to meet these needs, including personalization, real-time
feedback, and authentic simulation. Third, defense studies contextualize this solution by highlighting AI’s
emerging role in multinational coordination and communication in high-stakes military environments.
Together, these perspectives provide a robust foundation for the study and the conceptualization of the AI-
ESMP Adaptive Framework as a bridge between the peacekeeping communicative needs of the Pakistan Army
and the pedagogical affordances of AI technology.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework for integrating AI into ESMP training
METHODOLOGY
This study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Stratified random sampling ensured
adequate representation of both strata: 30 officers (teachers) and 30 troops (learners). In the quantitative phase,
Likert-scale questionnaires captured digital literacy, ESMP literacy, AI suitability, readiness, and motivation.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews
explored participants’ perceptions of AIs potential, barriers, and institutional implications. Data integration
followed a side-by-side explanatory approach.
RESULTS
The quantitative findings highlighted notable differences between officers and troops. Officers reported strong
digital literacy (M=4.53) and full endorsement of institutional adoption (M=5.00), but low personal readiness
(M=3.43). Troops, in contrast, demonstrated moderate digital literacy (M=3.37) but significantly higher
motivation (M=4.23) and support for compulsory AI-ESMP training (M=4.30).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for officers and troops (Means and Standard Deviations)
Variable
Officer (M, SD)
Troops (M, SD)
Digital Literacy
4.53 (0.51)
3.37 (0.67)
Peacekeeping
Communicative Needs
AI Affordances (Adaptive,
Simulation, Feedback)
AI-Adapative Framework
Page 41
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Readiness
3.43 (050)
4.30 (0.79)
Motivation
3.87 (0.68)
4.23 (0.77)
Institutional Support
5.00 (0.00)
_____
The joint display matrix integrated quantitative and qualitative results, revealing a clear divergence in
perspectives. Officers emphasized policy alignment, security, and infrastructural readiness, while troops valued
AIs flexibility, feedback, and practical mission relevance.
Table 2. Joint display of officers and troops’ perspectives on AI-ESMP.
Theme
Troops
Digital Literacy
Moderate skills require training
Readiness
Strong readiness, support compulsory AI-ESMP
Motivation
Highly motivated, career relevance
Barriers
Connectivity, operational restrictions
The following bar chart visually illustrates the comparison between officers’ and troops’ perceptions of key
variables.
Figure 2. Comparison of responses from Officers and Troops
DISCUSSION
The results indicate a complementary readiness profile between officers and troops. Officers, with their digital
competence and institutional authority, are positioned as facilitators of policy and infrastructure. Their low
personal readiness is not a lack of competence but a professional responsibility born from their role in
protecting operational integrity and navigating long-standing bureaucratic procedures. In contrast, troops,
despite lower digital literacy, bring strong enthusiasm and motivation to adopt the AI-ESMP Adaptive
Framework. This synergy of institutional caution and user-level motivation is critical for successful
implementation.
These findings validate the theoretical underpinnings of the study. ESP Needs Analysis explains the distinct
language needs of officers and troops, while recent ESMP scholarship situates these needs within
peacekeeping contexts. AI learning theories support the observed preference for adaptive, scenario-based
learning, while defense research aligns with officers recognition of institutional modernization. The
Page 42
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
convergence of theory and results thus confirms the value of an AI-ESMP Adaptive Framework for UN
peacekeeping.
LIMITATIONS
However, one of the factors behind the cautious approach of the officers had been that by incorporating the AI-
ESMP Adaptive Framework for the Pakistan Military, as cautioned by Bannister et al. (2023), its application
might result in cybersecurity vulnerabilities, reliability challenges, and ethical concerns in data governance.
These limitations point to the need for cautious, well-regulated implementation to ensure that technological
advancement does not compromise operational integrity or institutional trust.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This study concludes that an AI-ESMP Adaptive Framework is both feasible and desirable for the Pakistan
Army. By embedding mission-driven communicative tasks within AI-enabled environments, the framework
balances officer-level endorsement with troop-level motivation. To implement such a framework, the study
recommends a multi-pronged approach, i.e., capacity-building in AI literacy for both officers and troops,
phased adoption of AI-ESMP alongside conventional methods, investment in secure infrastructure, and
embedding ESMP into official military ELT policy. By doing so, the Pakistan Army can set a precedent for
other troop-contributing nations in using AI to support peacekeeping effectiveness.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The research was conducted independently, without any financial or
non-financial influences.
Authors Contributions
The following have been the contributions of the Authors:
Unaiza Khudai collected data, analyzed, and compiled
Dr Shanti Chandran supervised and guided the design and conduct of the research
Dr. Marsha proofread the composition and checked for technical detailing of the paper, and helped in
revising the final manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Major Rab Nawaz, Retd, for facilitating the
conduct of research and collection of data for the study.
REFERENCES
1. Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for Specific Purposes. Routledge.Bannister, F., Connolly, R., &
Kavanagh, T. (2023). Ethical and practical considerations of AI adoption. Journal of Information Systems,
37(1), 4560.
2. Biggs, D. (2025). AI applications in peacekeeping and defense communications. Defense Studies Review,
14(2), 112129.
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.).
SAGE Publications.
5. Ejaz, A., & Jamil, R. (2024). Generative AI in task-based language teaching. Language Education
Technology Journal, 21(3), 88105.
6. Farwa, U., & Garewal, G. A. (2018). An analysis of UN peacekeeping as Pakistan's soft power asset.
NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability, 1(2), 91-102.
Page 43
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
7. Joseph, S. (2023). Military English training needs and ESP integration. Journal of Applied Linguistics,
19(4), 5573.
8. Khudai, U., & Sandaran, S. C. Investigating the Needs of an ESP Course for Pakistani Soldiers. Published
in November 2022© Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities UTM ISBN 978-629-97531-3-1
9. Likert, R. (1932) A technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 140:5-55
Meniado, J. C. (2023). Teaching English for specific military purposes. ESP Today, 11(2), 215234.
10. Monzón Baeza, I., et al. (2025). AI-driven tactical communications in multinational defense contexts.
International Journal of Defense Technology, 44(1), 7795.
11. Rahman, T., Khan, A., & Malik, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and military education. Asian Journal of
Military Studies, 9(1), 1327.
12. Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Applications of AI in language learning: A review. Computer Assisted
Language Learning, 33(1), 124.
13. Vaishnav, M. (2024). Challenges of English proficiency in South Asian peacekeeping missions. Journal of
Peacekeeping Studies, 18(2), 141160.
14. Woo, H., & Choi, J. (2021). Adaptive AI systems for personalized ELT. Language Teaching Research,
25(6), 789807.