TAM constructs. Strong perceived usefulness and ease of use translated into positive attitudes and intentions to
continue use, providing a platform for sustained adoption in language learning contexts. These findings,
consistent with TAM research and the broader literature on gameβmediated learning, support further classroom
trials and localisation to widen access and impact (Davis, 1989; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Chen et al., 2020.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The researchers would like to thank all participants of the research in using the application and assisting in the
completion of this project; directly and indirectly.
REFERENCES
1. Ali, N., & Peebles, D. (2013). The effect of Gestalt laws of perceptual organisation on the comprehension
of three-variable bar and line graphs. Human Factors, 55(1), 183-203.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812452592
2. Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on
beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviours. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446-467.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
3. Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020). The effects of using mobile devices on language learning, a
meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1769-1789.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5
4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information
technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319β340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
5. Dresp-Langley, B. (2015). Principles of perceptual grouping, implications for image-guided surgery.
Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01565
6. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
7. Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A.-S. (2020). Influence of studentsβ learning
style, sense of presence and cognitive load on learning outcomes in an immersive virtual reality learning
environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596-615.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422
8. Kao, D., Ratan, R., Mousas, C., & Magana, A. J. (2021). The effects of a self-similar avatar voice in
educational games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY), Article 238.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3474665
9. Li, Y., Liang, Z., Li, Z., Yu, Y., Yang, Q., & Li, X. (2025). Effectiveness of GagnΓ©βs Nine Events of
Instruction in health professions education, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine,
12, 1522830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1522830
10. Liu, S., Zhang, S., & Dai, Y. (2025). Do mobile games improve language learning, a
meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online
publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2528786
11. McNeill, L., & Fitch, D. (2023). Microlearning through the lens of GagnΓ©βs Nine Events of Instruction, a
qualitative study. TechTrends, 67(4), 521β533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00805-x
12. Ren, W., Li, S., & LΓΌ, X. (2023). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second language pragmatics
instruction. Applied Linguistics, 44(6), 1010β1029. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac055
13. Stephan, R. (2024). Student feedback on archaeogaming, perspectives from a classics classroom. Journal of
Computer Applications in Archaeology, 7(1), 126 133. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.139
14. Ε umak, B., HeriΔko, M., & PuΕ‘nik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance, the
role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067β
2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
15. Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance, where instructional studies were, are and should be
going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1β50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263
16. Taguchi, N. (2023). Game-based instruction of pragmatics, learning request-making through perlocutionary
effects. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1 18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73519