Page 447
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
STEM-ESL Integration through a CSR Module in Malaysian
Secondary Education
*1
Doreen Dillah,
2
Sathiyaperba Subramaniam,
3
Fadiatul Hasinah Muhammad,
4
Siti Aisyah Zawawi,
5
Nor Hashima Mohd Sukor
1,3,4,5
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil,
Dengkil 43800, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, Merbok 08400, Kedah,
Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.925ILEIID000076
Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025; Published: 07 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study explores the implementation of an integrated module that bridges scientific literacy and language
competence, developed through a corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiative at a local boarding school.
The module, which combines hands-on experiments and engaging and language-based tasks, was used as the
intervention. 80 Form 2 students took part in a sequence of STEM demonstrations (Newton’s law, acid and
base, and simple circuits), followed by language-focused activities designed to reinforce STEM vocabulary
and promote their creative use through a structured story-plot expansion in short-story writing. A self-rating
pictogram-based self-reported checklist comprising 68 words relating to STEM concepts and thematic
vocabulary was used to assess students’ vocabulary knowledge before and after the intervention. For
triangulation purposes, data were also derived from four language instructors' observation checklists and
students' feedback forms. Results revealed considerable vocabulary gains, with students reporting improved
recognition and confidence in using STEM vocabulary, enjoyment, and perceived relevance of the activities
following the intervention. Instructor observations highlighted active participation, strong engagement, and the
feasibility of a wider use of the integrated STEM-ESL lessons with some adjustment. The quantitative and
qualitative data triangulation supports the effectiveness of the module in promoting conceptual understanding
and language development. This study contributes to interdisciplinary learning research by presenting a CSR-
driven pedagogical innovation integrating STEM literacy and ESL writing competence.
Keywords: STEM-ESL interdisciplinary learning, CLIL, creative writing, CSR in education, Malaysian
secondary education
INTRODUCTION
Proficiency in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and English as a Second
Language (ESL) has become crucial for global competitiveness. The ability to think scientifically and
communicate effectively in English is recognised as a critical 21st-century competency. Many countries are
investing significantly to strengthen education to produce students who master scientific concepts and
communicate them successfully in English. In Malaysia, where English is taught as a second language and
STEM subjects are delivered predominantly in Bahasa Melayu and English in Dual Language Programme
(DLP) schools, meeting the demand for this competency presents significant challenges. Even though there are
efforts to strengthen STEM education, many secondary school students still struggle with the specialised
vocabulary required to comprehend and express STEM concepts when the language of instruction is not the
native language (Macaro et al., 2018). Othman’s (2024) study similarly highlighted that students learning
science subjects in English face difficulties “due to unfamiliar scientific terminology, abstract concepts, and
Page 448
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
limited prior exposure to the subject matter.” This is especially so as the students are still developing their
general English proficiency.
There is a growing need in Malaysia for new and innovative pedagogical models that connect STEM and ESL
in ways that are both meaningful and intriguing. Nevertheless, well-designed, replicable integrated models are
scarce. Moreover, the efforts focus mainly on improving English proficiency through literature and general
writing activities and developing STEM knowledge through experiments, with limited overlap between the
two domains. The absence of structured STEM-ESL integration prevents the opportunities for students to
develop both scientific literacy and expressive writing skills through intriguing hands-on and engaging
activities. This is reiterated from 2013 studies by the Ministry of Education (MOE), which indicate that
teaching and learning of STEM subjects are mostly teacher-centred, depriving students of the opportunities to
be critical, creative, and innovative.
The project ‘From Imagination to Inspiration: Bridging STEM Concepts to ESL Creative Writing’ was
designed to address this gap. It was conducted among Form 2 students in a secondary boarding school in
Putrajaya, Malaysia. The key STEM concepts and vocabulary in English were introduced, and then students
were guided to apply the knowledge creatively in short-story writing. By integrating STEM enrichment with
narrative expressions, the initiative sought to enhance students’ STEM-related vocabulary, improve their
English writing skills, and increase their engagement and motivation through innovative, cross-disciplinary
activities.
This paper reports on the development and implementation of the project and explores the following research
questions:
1. To what extent does the STEM-ESL integration module improve students' STEM-related vocabulary
knowledge as measured by a pictogram-based self-rating checklist?
2. What are the instructors' observations of students' engagement, participation, and language use during the
implementation of the STEM-ESL integration module?
3. What aspects of the STEM-ESL integration module do students find the most valuable?
This project is supported through a CSR initiative to demonstrate a replicable model to foster scientific literacy
while contributing to Malaysia’s ongoing efforts to strengthen both STEM and English proficiency. It is also
an educational innovation with potential global relevance.
LITERATURE REVIEW
This review synthesises research on (1) STEM in language education through integrated approaches, (2)
vocabulary development and creative writing, (3) STEMESL integration, and (4) corporate social
responsibility (CSR) in education. Together, these strands highlight the need for tested integration modules
that combine hands-on STEM activities with ESL writing.
STEM in Language Education: CLIL and Integrated Approaches
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) provide a framework for merging subject content with
language instruction (Arús-Hita & Bárcena, 2024). CLIL advocates for the purposeful use of the target
language, ensuring that disciplinary knowledge and linguistic competence reinforce each other. In line with
this, Pazilah et al. (2025) pointed out that STEM students often lack specialised vocabulary, academic writing
skills, and oral proficiency, expressing a need for targeted support and interactive, contextualised learning
experiences. Similarly, Balqis (2018) contended that vocabulary is an essential component in second or foreign
language learning, and STEM learners who lack sufficient vocabulary struggle to express concepts fluently or
understand English texts. Halik and Jayasundara (2021) further observed that such deficiencies reduce
learners’ effectiveness in both oral and written communication. Meanwhile, Therova (2022) noted that written
tasks remain a primary mode of assessment, making writing support vital for STEM students’ academic
success.
Page 449
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Creative Writing, Storytelling, and Vocabulary Development
Recent research reinforces creative writing and storytelling as a powerful means for vocabulary acquisition in
ESL contexts. Jan and Aziz (2022) established that incorporating short stories into writing instruction
enhanced students’ creative expression and expanded their vocabulary, while Lim and Noor (2019) likewise
showed that digital storytelling improved secondary school learners’ writing skills by situating new vocabulary
in meaningful contexts. Extending these insights to STEM education, Fitri et al. (2022) emphasised that digital
storytelling tasks fostered motivation, idea generation, and peer collaboration, thereby supporting the
acquisition of a specialised vocabulary essential for engaging with scientific and technical content.
In a related study, Karim and Mustapha (2020) found that creative tools such as digital mind maps stimulated
critical and creative thinking in ESL writing courses, thereby indirectly strengthening vocabulary learning.
Seng et al. (2020), who share the same notion, concluded that integrating the 21st-century learning skills, such
as creativity, collaboration, and critical thinking, into ESL classrooms enhances students’ linguistic and
cognitive growth. Together, these findings posit that narrative-based pedagogies, whether through short stories,
digital storytelling, or creative mapping, are not only effective for general ESL learning but are also crucial for
preparing STEM students to access and communicate disciplinary knowledge through enriched vocabulary.
STEMESL Integration: Emerging but Limited Evidence
Despite the clear theoretical alignment between CLIL and STEM language learning, empirical work on
integrated STEM-ESL modules remains limited. This limitation was also highlighted by Pazilah et al. (2025),
who reported that STEM students' lack of specialised vocabulary, academic writing skills, and oral proficiency
pointed to the importance of language support tailored to disciplinary contexts. To complement this, Warr and
West (2023) emphasised that targeted writing instruction in STEM would improve academic performance and
foster critical thinking when embedded in inquiry-based learning.
However, studies on technology-mediated integration provide broader perspectives. For example, Yang and
Baldwin (2020) postulated that web-based inquiry environments within STEM frameworks can promote
English practice through collaborative problem-solving. By the same token, Khanal (2023) and Wagle et al.
(2024) stressed the value of contextualised language learning, where English use is embedded in authentic
STEM tasks such as lab reports, simulations, and project presentations. Taken together, these studies suggest
real promise for integrated approaches, but they also reveal the scarcity of robust, replicable models that
explicitly link hands-on STEM activities with English language outcomes, particularly in Malaysian lower-
secondary contexts, where such innovations are most needed.
Collaborative initiatives have been recognised as valuable enablers for educational innovation, particularly
when schools partner with external organisations. These enhance resources and expertise, where structured
collaboration can directly strengthen classroom learning. Among others, Owens and Hite (2022) documented
that global collaboration projects in STEM settings enhance students’ communication competencies and offer
real-world opportunities to apply English in technical contexts. This report shows how partnerships through
instructional collaboration models and industry-linked projects can support interdisciplinary efforts like
STEMESL integration by providing authentic contexts and additional resources for language development.
The reviewed literature points to several converging insights. CLIL and integrated approaches indicate that
content and language learning can reinforce each other, with studies showing the value of embedding English
into STEM-related contexts (Pazilah et al., 2025; Warr & West, 2023). Creative writing and storytelling
research has also accentuated their roles in enhancing vocabulary and creativity. Jan and Aziz (2022) stated
that short stories support writing development, while Lim and Noor (2019) and Fitri et al. (2022) asserted that
digital storytelling fosters vocabulary growth, motivation, and collaboration. However, limited studies have
combined these strands into a tested, replicable module that combines hands-on STEM exploration, targeted
STEM vocabulary instruction, and creative writing tasks, particularly within the Malaysian ESL context.
Moreover, although collaboration and partnership models are often discussed as enabling factors, empirical
evidence of their roles in sustaining integrated STEMESL innovations remains scarce (Owens & Hite, 2022).
Therefore, in response to this scarcity, the replicable STEM-ESL module in the current study is potentially the
Page 450
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
first that directly links hands-on STEM activities with the acquisition of related thematic vocabulary in
English. The present project addresses this gap by designing and evaluating a STEMESL integration module
that introduces STEM concepts and vocabulary in English and then challenges students to embed these
elements into original short stories. Supported through collaborative partnerships, the project seeks to provide
evidence of how such a module can enhance vocabulary acquisition and student engagement.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study employed a mixed-methods pre-post design combining quantitative (pictogram-based self-rated
vocabulary checklist, instructor Likert items) and qualitative (open-ended evaluation and comments in short
structured feedback from the four instructors and participants) data to evaluate the STEM-ESL integrated
module. These allow triangulation across student self-report, instructor observation, and student feedback to
infer the effects of the module, used as the intervention, on the students’ understanding of STEM concepts and
thematic vocabulary, as well as classroom engagement. Creswell and Plano Clark (2018) asserted that
combining numeric evidence and descriptive accounts ensures a comprehensive understanding of the module’s
impact on language learning and engagement.
Participants and Sampling
This study involved a total of 80 Form 2 students from a public boarding secondary school in Malaysia and
integrated a CSR-funded module through a 5-hour STEM-ESL Creative Writing workshop. The selection of
the participants considered a single cohort that learns most subjects (including STEM) predominantly in
Bahasa Melayu, as in the case of most schools in the country, using a convenience sampling technique, as they
were accessible within the CSR programme. The 80 sample size was deemed adequate for statistical analysis
based on prior CLIL and STEM-ESL intervention studies that highlighted medium to large effect sizes for
vocabulary acquisition (Sun et al. 2025), while acknowledging the limitations of convenience sampling and
potential sampling bias. Four language instructors (n = 4) delivered the module and completed the structured
observation checklists for triangulation purposes.
The STEM-ESL Integration Module (Intervention)
The module comprises two phases. The first phase of the module integrates three hands-on STEM
demonstrations (Newton’s law of motion, acid-base reactions, and simple electrical circuits) with language-
based activities that foster STEM concept comprehension and vocabulary enhancement. The second phase of
the module consisted of language-focused lessons that involved the application of STEM concepts and
consolidation of their thematic vocabulary. The dual-phase design is grounded in Content and Language
Integrated Learning (CLIL) principles (Coyle et al., 2010), allowing students to engage with STEM content
while enabling them to acquire thematic vocabulary and engage in meaningful language use. In other words,
the design leverages the content, communication, cognition, and culture, contextualising English learning
within the authentic STEM content for a deeper understanding of the concepts and narrative competence
(Mehisto et al., 2008).
Pedagogical scaffolding included multimodal supports with pictograms, visual aids, and structured writing
templates to reduce cognitive load and promote semantic processing (Nation, 2013). Formative assessment
was ongoing through pictogram self-ratings and instructor observations, aligning with CLIL's emphasis on
responsive feedback and adaptive learning (War & West, 2023). Collaboration between STEM content and
language instructors fostered interdisciplinary curriculum alignment and effective delivery (Owens & Hite,
2022).
Instruments
A self-rating vocabulary checklist with pictograms was used to assess students’ recognition and understanding
of STEM terms, administered before and after the intervention. The scoring scale ranges from 0 (unknown), 1
Page 451
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
(recognise), 2 (can explain briefly), and 3 (can explain and use in a sentence) for research question 1. For
triangulation purposes and additional data retrieval, the instructor observation checklist, completed by four
language instructors, comprised 17 items (with open-ended spaces for qualitative notes) that covered the
dimensions of student engagement, STEM-language integration, creativity, and collaboration, and qualitative
notes for research question two. Student feedback was collected to gauge their perspectives on the aspect(s) of
learning experiences they found most valuable (research question 3).
Data Collection and Analysis
Data collection was carried out in three stages: the pre-test STEM concepts and thematic vocabulary checklist,
intervention delivery with demonstrations of STEM experiments and language activities, and post-test
vocabulary checklist and student feedback. The four language instructors also completed their observation
checklists and reflective comments. The quantitative data were analysed for descriptive statistics to summarise
vocabulary scores, which included means, standard deviations (SDs), and Cohen’s d. A paired-samples t-test
assesses the pre-post vocabulary gains, while effect size (Cohen’s d) quantifies the magnitude of improvement.
The instructor and student open responses were coded thematically (Braun & Clarke, 2006) for engagement,
challenges, creativity, and feasibility, as well as valuable learning aspects. The data were anonymised, stored
securely, and used solely for research purposes. The school administration and the participants also granted
their permissions.
Limitations of this study include the use of convenience sampling that reduces generalisability and potential
instructor bias in the observation checklists. Therefore, data triangulation from multiple sources is ensured to
control bias. Meanwhile, randomised, controlled designs with larger samples and longitudinal follow-ups
should be considered for future studies.
Results
Impact of STEM-ESL Module on Students’ Vocabulary Scores
This section details the analysis of the pre- and post-intervention vocabulary scores, followed by instructors’
observational data on participation and language application, as well as student feedback. The scores from the
pictogram-based self-rating checklist were analysed and presented as tables.
Table 1 shows that students’ STEM thematic vocabulary knowledge improved significantly after participating
in the STEM-ESL creative writing module. The pre-intervention mean score was 1.94 (SD = 0.45), which
increased to 2.75 (SD = 0.46) post-intervention. The paired-samples t-test confirmed the statistically
significant improvement, t(df) = 35.12 (79) and p < 0.001, with a significantly notable effect size (Cohen’s d =
3.86).
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Students’ STEM Thematic Vocabulary Knowledge Scores Before and After
the Integrated Module
Measure
STEM Concepts and
Thematic Vocabulary
Knowledge
Pre-Intervention, M
1.94
Pre-Intervention, M
2.75
Pre-Intervention, SD
0.45
Pre-Intervention, SD
0.46
Page 452
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
t (df)
35.12 (79)
p-value
< 0.001
Cohen’s d
3.86
Note. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; t = paired samples t statistics; df = degrees of freedom; p =
significant level; Cohen’s d = effect size.
The data indicate significant improvement in their familiarity, understanding, and correct usage of the
vocabulary after the intervention, confirming the effectiveness of the STEM-ESL creative module in
effectively boosting students’ vocabulary knowledge. The statistically significant and notable increment in
STEM vocabulary gains underscores the module’s success in fostering STEM-ESL integration in a creative
writing context. The integration of STEM experiments and language-focused activities helped to improve
students’ mastery of related vocabulary, as captured by the pictogram-based self-rating checklist that provided
an accessible and effective measure for this development.
InstructorsObservations
Table 2 displays the instructors’ responses regarding students’ engagement, participation, and language use
after the implementation of the STEM-ESL integrated module. They were retrieved using the Likert-scale
ratings (1 = low; 5 = high), which comprehensively captured the above-stated dimensions. High mean scores
(>4.4) and high percentages of the rating of 4 or 5 (>75%) across all items revealed positive observations.
Attentiveness and motivation (M=4.75; 93% rating 4 or 5), understanding of STEM concepts and thematic
vocabulary (M=4.75; 93%), as well as collaboration and peer support (M=4.70; 91%). Meanwhile, active
participation in vocabulary-building and application of STEM concepts and thematic vocabulary in writing
were also rated highly, with both scored at M=4.63, and at least 89% of the high rating of 4 or 5. Enthusiasm in
creative writing, use of instructional materials, and practical sequence of activities received positive but with
lower ratings, suggesting the instructors’ general satisfaction with the aspects. Time allocation for tasks
received the lowest mean rating of M=4.10 and 70% of the high ratings, indicating that they faced challenges
with time and pacing of the activities. It is important to note that the instructors strongly supported the
module’s feasibility for wider classroom use (M=4.60, 90%).
Table 2. Language Instructors’ Ratings of the STEM-ESL Module
Aspect
Mean
Rating
% Rating
4 or 5
Attentiveness and motivation
4.75
93%
Active participation in vocabulary-
building
4.63
89%
Enthusiasm in creative writing
4.50
85%
Understanding of STEM
concepts
4.75
93%
Application of STEM thematic
vocabulary in writing
4.63
89%
Collaboration and peer support
4.70
91%
Effective use of instructional
material
4.55
88%
Practical sequence of activities
4.40
83%
Time allocation for tasks
4.10
75%
Page 453
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Feasibility for wider classroom
use
4.60
90%
In addition to the quantitative measure, the thematic qualitative analysis was also done to investigate
instructors’ opinions and comments on the same aspects after the implementation of the STEM-ESL
integration module. The results presented in Table 3 highlight four main themes.
Table 3. Themes from Language Instructors’ Open-Ended Feedback on the STEM-ESL Module
Summary
Students were highly motivated and
attentive, showing eagerness and positive
learning attitudes.
Some variation in proficiency levels led to
uneven participation, while time
constraints affected writing depth.
Students applied STEM thematic
vocabulary creatively in short stories and
supported peer collaboration.
The module is practical and well-
supported by instructional materials and
can potentially be widely implemented
with some adjustments made to time
allocation.
Instructors’ observations corroborate quantitative evidence by highlighting high engagement and enthusiasm,
active participation in vocabulary-building and story-writing tasks, as well as effective application of STEM
concepts and their thematic vocabulary. Engagement emerged as the most agreed-upon theme, with instructors
noting students’ high motivation, attentiveness, and positive learning attitudes throughout the workshop.
Challenges were also identified, which include varied language proficiency that resulted in uneven
participation, apart from time constraints that limited the depth of writing activities. Meanwhile, creativity was
observed as students applied STEM concepts and thematic vocabulary in their short stories, with peer
collaboration as a significant supportive aspect. All the instructors also confirmed the feasibility of the module,
noting that it was practical, well-supported by instructional materials, and with potential for wider
implementation.
A thematic analysis of the students’ open-ended feedback regarding the module was also carried out. Data
highlighted seven main themes students perceived as the most valuable aspects in the STEM-ESL module for
their language development and understanding of STEM concepts.
Table 4. Themes from Students Open-Ended Feedback on the Most Valuable Aspects in the STEM-ESL
Module.
Theme /
Description
Representative
quotations
N
(responses)
%
Collaborative
learning/
teamwork
“The part where my
friends and I discussed
and gave ideas to one
another.”
31
Creative writing/
story writing
“Learning how to produce
a short story and learning
about STEM concepts and
using them for writing.”
29
Page 454
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
Conceptual
understanding
(STEM concepts)
“The STEM experiment
demonstrations are
interesting and help me
learn new words.”
23
STEM
experiments/
Hands-on
learning
“Doing the science
experiments; the
experiments were fun.”
18
Vocabulary
development/Use
of STEM words
“Writing the short story in
English using STEM
concepts and vocabulary.”
15
Enjoyment/
Engagement
“The interesting teaching
methods that make me
focused.
11
Confidence/
Participation
“Become confident to share
my ideas in English.”
7
Instructional
support
“The explanation given was
useful and made it fun.”
5
Note. Some responses mentioned more than one theme; hence the percentages do not total 100.
Firstly, most students frequently mentioned collaborative learning and teamwork (31%) as the most valuable
aspect of the STEM-ESL module, which emphasises their importance and students’ confidence in using STEM
vocabulary during sentence construction and short-story writing. Students reported that collaboration produced
ideas and support for language development, enabling them to learn STEM vocabulary and use it in generating
writing ideas, which is the key objective of this module and CLIL-inspired pedagogy. Secondly, language
development through short stories (29%), using STEM vocabulary and concepts, was also regarded as an
engaging activity that enhances their vocabulary retention and narrative skills. Many students appreciated this
structure, stating that they enjoyed “learning to write a short story using STEM words” (S28) and writing a
short story in English using STEM concepts” (S45). Thirdly, conceptual understanding through STEM
experiments (23%) was also mentioned as a valuable aspect by the students. Next, students valued the STEM
experiments and hands-on learning (18%). Their interest and deepened grasp of STEM concepts and thematic
vocabulary were highlighted in some students’ feedback, which stated that the STEM experiment
demonstrations are interesting and help me learn the wordsand doing the science experimentsas reflected
by S22 and S70, respectively. STEM vocabulary development and its uses were also reported as the valuable
aspect of the module, with 15% of students mentioning so. Students also stated that the module helped them
increase their confidence and participation (7%). I am more confident to share my ideas with my friends in
English(S34) reflects this. They also found the integrated STEM and ESL activities enjoyable, engaging, and
stimulating experiences (11%), as reported by S67 and S29, who respectively wrote, “All activities… are
interesting and give ideas on writing short stories” and The science experiments are fun. The instructors’
supportive role (5%) was also mentioned as a valuable part of the integrated module. Students remarked on
supportive facilitators (S51) and explanation from the instructor helped me a lot (S73) as crucial for
clarifying STEM concepts and supporting language use necessary for sustaining their engagement and
comprehension.
DISCUSSION OF KEY FINDINGS
Vocabulary Development (RQ1)
The most prominent finding of this study was the significant gain following the STEM-ESL integration
module in students’ vocabulary development. The improved pictorial-based self-rating checklist mean scores
from 1.94 to 2.75 with a statistically significant t (df) = 35.12 (79), p = <0.001, revealed clear vocabulary gains
from a total of 68 targeted STEM words. The large size effect based on Cohen’s d = 3.86 underscores the
pedagogical strength of the module. The shift from “I don’t know this word” (0) and “heard but not sure” (1) to
know the word” (2) and “can use in a sentence(3) suggests that the integrated module combining STEM
Page 455
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
experiments and language tasks provided meaningful contexts for students to improve recognition and
strengthen productive vocabulary knowledge. These results are consistent with CLIL-orientated research by
Coyle et al. (2010), which reports on the effectiveness of combining language tasks within subject learning to
scaffold vocabulary acquisition. The findings also directly address the critical needs highlighted by Pazilah et
al. (2025), who reported that STEM students often lacked the specialised vocabulary necessary for academic
success.
Instructor Observations (RQ2)
The instructors’ ratings and qualitative feedback aligned well with the vocabulary gains, reinforcing the
integrated module as an effective intervention. High scores yielded for attentiveness, motivation, and
vocabulary use showed the module’s effectiveness in engaging learners in both STEM experiments and
language tasks. The instructors reported that students were able to answer questions using the thematic
vocabulary correctly and actively use STEM-related words in tasks that included meaning-matching practices,
sentence construction, and short-story writing. These demonstrated the transfer of learning from the
experimental tasks and language-focused activities to language applications. However, the instructors also
noted uneven participation among students due to different proficiency levels. The instructors also identified
limited time as a significant drawback in implementing this integrated module. This problem is similar to the
challenge reported by Mehisto (2012) for the CLIL implementation, particularly in pacing and unequal
learners’ participation that lowered full engagement in language learning. Above all, the language instructors
unanimously suggested the strong feasibility and replicability of the integrated module for wider classroom use
with minor adjustments in the timing and pacing of the activities.
Students’ Feedback on the Most Valuable Gains from the STEM-ESL Integrated Module (RQ3)
Seven key elements identified in the students’ feedback aligned closely with the successful pedagogical
strategies identified in the literature review. The most valued aspects were learning and teamwork, which is
parallel to the findings by Fitri et al. (2022), who reported that digital storytelling tasks fostered peer
collaboration and motivation. In this study, students reported that they gained confidence through group
language-based activities, discussion, and short story writing. Creative short-story writing was also identified
as an enjoyable and effective way to practise vocabulary, while learning STEM concepts through hands-on
experiments was reported to be effective in remembering and applying the vocabulary. Students also valued
vocabulary development through the application of the STEM concepts and thematic vocabulary embedded in
the module to the short-story task. These resonate well with Jan and Aziz (2022), who highlighted the
importance of incorporating short stories to improve vocabulary and creative expression, as well as Lim and
Noor (2019), who demonstrated that storytelling enhanced writing skills by embedding vocabulary learning
into a meaningful context. Other themes such as enjoyment, confidence, and instructional support together
revealed an affectively positive learning environment, where students related fun and variety with increased
focus and motivation.
Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research
As this module was carried out as part of the CSR initiative, it involved a limited timeframe, which directly
posed several limitations. Firstly, although the use of a pictogram-based self-report STEM-related vocabulary
checklist is practical, it could be supplemented with objective measures such as pre-and post-tests of
vocabulary usage in writing to address the concern for academic writing skills. Secondly, the lack of a control
group suggests the necessity for a quasi-experimental design for more enriched findings and causal claims.
Thirdly, possible practical challenges resulting from students’ varying proficiency levels should also be
addressed by making necessary pedagogical adjustment to strengthen the module’s feasibility. Therefore,
future studies should look into long-term retention of vocabulary gains and explore the module’s efficacy
using students from different demographic contexts. A more thorough investigation into language instructors’
perspectives on the STEM-ESL integrated module would also be invaluable.
Page 456
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
CONCLUSION
This study, which focuses on selected STEM concepts and thematic vocabulary in English, contributes to the
body of literature in STEM and ESL integration through a CSR-driven module that provides scaffolding for
vocabulary enhancement, STEM literacy, and narrative writing skills among lower secondary students in
Malaysia. Despite being limited by the lack of a control group, this work provides a replicable framework for a
cross-disciplinary teaching approach to fulfil the ever-changing needs in the nation’s educational context.
Future research should use longitudinal tracking, controlled designs, and cross-school replication to further
validate the integration module.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA,
Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, Dengkil 43800, Selangor, Malaysia, for the financial support through
the DDF grant [UiTM.800-3/1 DDF.88 (004/2025)]. Finally, sincere gratitude also goes to the teachers and
students of SMA Putra, all lecturers, and members of the Student Outreach Society (SOS) Club, whose
contributions have made this CSR project possible.
REFERENCES
1. Amirinejad, M. & Rahimi, M. (2023). Integrating digital storytelling into STEAM teaching: Examining
young language learners development of self-regulation and English literacy. International Journal of
Technology in Education (IJTE), 6(4), 720-735. doi.org/10.46328/ijte.55
2. Arús-Hita, J., & Bárcena, E. (2024). Toward an integrated framework for CLIL-based blended teaching. In
Interdisciplinary research and innovation in bilingual and second language teacher education (pp. 173-
189). Routledge.
3. Balqis, N. (2018). Students’ problems in building up English vocabulary (A study at Sman 1 Baktiya)
(Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
4. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge
University Press.
5. Cresswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
6. Fitri, H. A., Mohamad, M., Harianingsih, I., & Wadi, A. S. (2022). Digital storytelling-based tasks on
speaking classroom; seen from ESL learners’ lenses. Jurnal Tatsqif, 20(2), 180-198.
https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v20i2.6289
7. Halik, A. F. A., & Jayasundara, N. S. (2021). Lack of vocabulary: A barrier to the oral communication
skills GCE A/L students in the Trincomalee district of Sri Lanka.
https://journals.kln.ac.lk/jhu/media/attachments/2021/12/02/chapter-07.pdf
8. Jan, T. P. & Aziz, A. A. (2022). The use of short stories in teaching writing strategies in ESL classrooms.
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12).
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i12/15398
9. Karim, R. A. & Mustapha, R. (2020). Students' perception on the use of digital mind map to stimulate
creativity and critical thinking in ESL writing course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A),
7596-7606. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082545
10. Khanal, H. R. (2023). Freirean strategies in meaningful learning: a critical pedagogy of contextualised
classroom. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 4(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v4i1.578
11. Lim, P. R. & Noor, N. M. (2019). Digital storytelling as a creative teaching method in promoting
secondary school students’ writing skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM),
13(07), 117. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i07.10798
12. Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium
instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 3676. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000350
13. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated
Learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.
14. Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya:
MOE.
Page 457
www.rsisinternational.org
ILEIID 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXV October 2025
15. Othman, J. (2024). Academic Vocabulary Learning in EMI Classrooms: Challenges and Strategies. Arab
World English Journal, 15(2): 3-18. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no2.1
16. Owens, A. D., & Hite, R. L. (2022). Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using
virtual global collaboration project-based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education,
40(1), 76102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1778663
17. Pazilah, F.N., Wah, J.L.P., & Ling, O.S. (2025). Bridging Language Gaps: A Review on the Lacks, Needs
and Wants of STEM Students in English Language Learning. Emily Abd Rahman Nur Khadirah Ab.
Rahman Harwati Hashim, 75.
18. Seng, G. H., Muhamad, M., & Kiely, R. (2020). Integration of 21st-century learning skills and teacher
characteristics in ESL classrooms: the case of Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8
(12A), 7561-7566. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082541
19. Sun, D., Yin, J., Amsah, N., & O’Brien, M.G. (2025). Cognitive and metacognitive predictors of
vocabulary acquisition in second language learniers: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Education, 8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.20231210640
20. Sun, W. & Zhong, B. (2023). Integrating reading and writing with STEAM/STEM: A systematic review
on STREAM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 939-958. doi.org/10.1002/jee.20569
21. Therova, D. (2022). The development of academic vocabulary in international foundation students
assessed academic writing. The Journal of International Students, 12(1), 123140.
https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12i1.2824
22. Wagle, S. K., Luitel B. C., & Krogh, E. (2024) Exploring possibilities for participatory approaches to
contextualised teaching and learning: a case from a public school in Nepal. Educational Action Research,
32(2), 276-294. https://10.1080/09650792.2023.2183874
23. Warr, M., & West, R. E. (2020). Bridging academic disciplines with interdisciplinary project-based
learning: Challenges and opportunities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1).
24. Yang, D. & Baldwin, S. J. (2020). Using technology to support student learning in an integrated STEM
learning environment. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.22