stay motivated. These elements transform PVAC from a simple time management tool into a dynamic learning
journey that actively engages students in their vocabulary development.
Besides, PVAC is also positioned as a socially responsible and sustainable product due to the use of FSC-
certified, recycled, or eco-friendly paper.
In terms of future direction, PVAC could develop into a variety of academic planners or calendars that are
suited to various language learning requirements, including idioms, academic writing expressions, discipline-
specific terminology, or even vocabulary related to soft skills. Additionally, the PVAC model could be adapted
for use in other Malaysian universities, secondary schools, or professional training programmes.
Most importantly, a systematic evaluation is necessary to determine whether this innovation effectively
enhances learning outcomes and delivers meaningful benefits to students. Therefore, future research could
investigate the calendar’s measurable effects on vocabulary retention, language proficiency, and academic
performance, providing data to guide further refinement and product expansion. This process will help ensure
that PVAC remains relevant, scalable, and adaptable to diverse learning contexts.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The project team would like to express sincere gratitude to Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) for providing
the platform, guidance, and encouragement to turn this idea into reality.
REFERENCES
1. Algethami, G., & Almalki, S. (2016). The avoidance of using English phrasal verbs by EFL Saudi learners.
Journal of the Faculty of Arts, 59, 3-10, https://doi.org/10.21608/artman.2016.152321
2. Alhammadi, D., & Rabab’ah, G. (2025). Phrasal verb acquisition and perceptions among Emirati EFL
learners. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2503096
3. Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2024). A multimodal analysis of phrasal verbs in OpenCourseWare lecture
video clips: Insights for listening comprehension in English language teaching. In Designing Learning
with Digital Technologies Perspectives from Multimodality in Education (pp. 143-163).
4. Haugh, S., & Takeuchi, O. (2024). Learner knowledge of English phrasal verbs: Awareness, confidence,
and learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 34(2), 656-671.
doi:10.1111/ijal.12523
5. Huwari, I. F., Erkir, S., Alwreikat, E. A., Alqaryouti, M. H., & Alshewiter, K. M. (2025). Understanding
the semantics of phrasal verbs. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(2),
4299-4307. doi:10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.6302
6. Saeed, A. T. (2025). Assessing the challenges with prepositions in phrasal prepositional verbs: Insights
from Arab EFL learners. Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal, 11, 21- 38.
https://doi.org/10.32038/ltf.2025.11.02
7. Strong, B. (2025). Patterns of Phrasal Verb Use in Asian Learner English: A Corpus Study by Country and
Proficiency. Journal of Asia TEFL, 22(2), 203-219. doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2025.22.2.1.203
8. Tao, M., & Wang, J. (2021). Effects of teaching approach based on three-dimensional grammar on grade
eight students’ acquisition of english phrasal verbs. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(9), 1050-
1058. doi:10.17507/tpls.1109.10
9. Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2020). The review and prospect of the acquisition and teaching methods of phrasal
verbs. Journal of Humanities and Education Development (JHED), 2 (6), 411-417
10. Zhi, L. & Juan, S. (2015). A view of research on English polysemous phrasal verbs. Journal of Literature
and Art Studies, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2015.08.010