complemented by occasional native-speaker guest sessions. Furthermore, peer structures such as conversation
circles, exchanges with Japan-based students, and clear peer-feedback protocols can deepen practice and
motivation among the learners. In addition, Impact should also be monitored through pre/post proficiency
checks, brief affect measures (e.g., motivation, confidence), and learning analytics to gain more insights into
the effectiveness of the project. Future partnerships with Osaka-based organisations can further enable virtual
site visits and authentic tasks that strengthen cultural insights.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We extend our sincere appreciation to the students from the various faculties at University Technology MARA
(UiTM) Kedah who participated in the Online Japanese Language Learning (OnJaLL) initiative. Our heartfelt
thanks go to the non-native Japanese instructor based in Osaka, Japan, whose time, expertise, and third-speaker
perspective enriched learners’ linguistic development and cultural understanding. We are grateful to the UiTM
Kedah administration, programme coordinators, and language centre colleagues for facilitating recruitment, of
the participants.
REFERENCES
1. Hiratsuka, T. (2025a). Native-speakerism and trans-speakerism in ELT: Interpretations, manifestations, and
ramifications. System.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103490](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103490)
2. Hiratsuka, T., Hitomi, M., & Chang, T. (2025b). Beneficiaries of native-speakerism on trans-speakerism. In
Trans-speakerism. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003597704-
8](https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003597704-8)
3. Hiratsuka, T., Nall, M., & Castellano, J. (2023). Shifting from native-speakerism to trans-speakerism: A
trioethnography of language teachers in Japan. TESL-EJ, 26*(3), 1–23.
[https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a1](https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a1)
4. Kubota, R. (2020). Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and
gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41*(5), 712–732.
[https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033](https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033)
5. Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Non-native teachers of Japanese and their pedagogical advantage: Reconsidering
native-speakerism in Japanese language education. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,
42*(8), 701–716.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746315](https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746315)
6. Miyazato, K. (2022). Occupational power and NS–NNS/novice–expert relationships in preservice team
teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 24*(2), 45–65.
[https://doi.org/10.55593/asianefl.2022.2402a3](https://doi.org/10.55593/asianefl.2022.2402a3)
7. Nagashima, Y., & Lawrence, L. (2025). Social media English teaching and native-speakerism in Japan. In
New Directions in English Language Teaching. Routledge. \[DOI not yet available, forthcoming
publication]
8. Rivers, D. J. (2011). Japanese national identification and English language learning processes. International
Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35*(1), 111–123.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.09.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.09.005)
9. Sakamoto, M. (2024). Challenging hegemonic discourse via COIL: A Japan-US initiative. Faculty of
Foreign Studies, Sophia University. Retrieved from
[http://ffs.sophia.ac.jp/en/research/faculty\_research/challenging-hegemonic-discourse-via-coil-a-japan-us-
initiative/](http://ffs.sophia.ac.jp/en/research/faculty_research/challenging-hegemonic-discourse-via-coil-a-
japan-us-initiative/)
10. Sato, S., & Doerr, N. M. (2021). Native speakerism and the complexity of teacher identity: Insights from
non-native teachers of Japanese. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8*(2), 119–135.
[https://doi.org/10.17239/LingT.2021.08.02.04](https://doi.org/10.17239/LingT.2021.08.02.04)
11. Taguchi, N. (2020). Technology-mediated pragmatics learning in Japanese as a foreign language. CALICO
Journal, 37*(2), 123–142. [https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.36046](https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.36046)