www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8350

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

Digital Tools for Language Acquisition and Intercultural Adaptation:

Enhancing Student Outcomes in U.S. Multicultural Classrooms

Daniel GUTIERREZ

, Hakeem A. NAFIU

Adjunct Professor, Carolina University, U.S.,

Educational Administration, Carolina University, U.S.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0629

Received: 08 October 2025; Accepted: 16 October 2025; Published: 11 November 2025

ABSTRACT

This study explored the role of digital learning platforms in enhancing language acquisition and intercultural

adaptation among students in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S. With increasingly diverse classrooms,

hosting international and bilingual learners, educators faced opportunities and challenges in leveraging

technology to support multilingual populations. The research explored how digital tools, such as Duolingo for

Schools, Immersive Reader, Grammarly, and Rosetta Stone for Education, facilitated resource access,

communication, and participation in higher education and secondary schools. A mixed-methods approach was

employed, using a purposive sample of 120 students and 12 instructors from three Winston-Salem institutions.

Data were collected through classroom observations, student surveys, and follow-up instructor interviews to

assess the impact of digital technologies on proficiency, retention, confidence, and involvement. Findings

revealed that effective digital integration significantly improved language proficiency (d = 0.92, p < 0.001),

fostered collaborative learning (68%), and supported smoother cultural adjustment for international students.

However, 20-22% of students in rural and low-income areas faced access barriers, highlighting equity gaps.

The study emphasized the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model and Community of

Inquiry (CoI) framework as critical for guiding technology adoption. Recommendations included targeted

teacher training, institutional policies promoting technology-driven pedagogy, and student-centered digital

resource design. Aligning pedagogy with technology in North Carolina’s schools and universities cultivated

inclusive environments, enhancing academic success and global competence.

Keywords – Digital learning platforms, language acquisition, intercultural adaptation, educational technology,

proficiency, retention, confidence, involvement, inclusive education, U.S.

INTRODUCTION

In the evolving U.S. education, multicultural classrooms have become emblematic of global

interconnectedness, where students from immigration-driven backgrounds converge to create dynamic learning

environments that blend diverse linguistic traditions and cultural perspectives. This diversity, while fostering

innovative exchanges, often leads to challenges such as linguistic barriers that hinder equitable participation

and academic progress [35]. Digital tools, ranging from learning management systems to AI-powered

applications, have increasingly been recognized as essential bridges in this context, offering scalable solutions

that transcend traditional barriers by providing interactive, real-time support for language development [38],

[40]. For instance, Chun et al. [7] emphasized that technology not only enhances language teaching but also

promotes cultural integration by enabling collaborative interactions among learners from varied origins.

Furthermore, recent advancements in mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) have demonstrated potential

in personalizing education for multilingual populations, allowing for tailored vocabulary building and

pronunciation practice [23]. In addition, platforms like social media facilitate informal learning, where students

engage with authentic cultural content to build intercultural awareness [28]. However, disparities in digital

access can exacerbate inequities, underscoring the need for inclusive implementation strategies that address

socioeconomic gaps [30]. As a result, understanding the role of these tools is imperative for fostering

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8351

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

environments where all students can thrive academically and socially, particularly as AI tools in 2025 offer

enhanced personalization for diverse learners.

The integration of digital tools in multicultural settings extends beyond mere accessibility to actively shaping

pedagogical strategies that align with diverse learner needs, thereby transforming classrooms into hubs of

hybrid cultural and linguistic exploration. Educators must navigate the complexities of globalization, where

classrooms mirror broader societal shifts toward hybrid cultural identities that require adaptive teaching

methods. Lee [19] illustrated how informal digital learning cultivates strategic competence for cross-cultural

communication, particularly among non-native speakers who benefit from exposure to varied language

varieties. Moreover, social networks serve as vital environments for second language teaching, enabling

collaborative exchanges that mirror real-world interactions and promote empathy across cultures [9]. In

parallel, translanguaging practices supported by digital technologies allow learners to draw on their full

linguistic repertoires, enhancing both acquisition and cultural adaptation by blending home languages with

target ones [34]. However, challenges such as platform usability and cultural biases in content must be

addressed to maximize benefits, as these can alienate users from non-dominant backgrounds [37]. As a result,

digital integration demands a balanced approach that considers ethical implications and equitable access,

ensuring tools like game-based learning foster inclusive participation

Language proficiency is a cornerstone in multicultural education, encompassing the ability to comprehend,

produce, and utilize language effectively in varied contexts that demand both linguistic accuracy and cultural

sensitivity. Proficiency not only facilitates academic participation but also underpins intercultural competence

by enabling nuanced communication across cultural boundaries, such as negotiating meanings in group

discussions or interpreting idiomatic expressions [9], [38], [40], [19]. Godwin-Jones [11] argued that digital

platforms like Duolingo for Schools provide adaptive paths that align with individual proficiency levels,

fostering gradual skill development through interactive exercises tailored to diverse needs. In addition,

Chapelle [5] highlighted how computer-assisted tools offer immediate feedback, which refines grammatical

accuracy and vocabulary use in diverse settings, thereby reducing errors in real-time applications. Furthermore,

recent meta-analyses confirm that MALL applications significantly boost proficiency through gamified

elements and personalized content, with effects particularly pronounced in multicultural groups [23]. However,

cultural biases in digital interfaces can impede progress for non-dominant language users, leading to frustration

and disengagement [28]. Consequently, proficiency’s role in bridging linguistic gaps necessitates tools that

incorporate multilingual support, such as AI-driven translation features that preserve cultural nuances.

The development of proficiency in multicultural classrooms involves not just linguistic mastery but also the

integration of sociopragmatic awareness, where learners adapt language to cultural norms, such as varying

politeness strategies or contextual cues in conversations. Digital tools enhance this by simulating authentic

scenarios, such as virtual exchanges that mimic cross-cultural dialogues and allow practice in safe, iterative

settings [37], [23]. Kern [15] demonstrated that asynchronous platforms like Canvas build proficiency through

scaffolded tasks that encourage self-expression, gradually exposing learners to complex sociopragmatic

elements. Moreover, Stockwell [32] noted that mobile apps promote iterative practice, leading to improved

communicative competence in hybrid environments by tracking progress and adjusting difficulty. In addition,

social media’s role in informal learning expands proficiency by exposing users to diverse dialects and idioms,

fostering adaptability in multicultural interactions [22]. Nevertheless, access inequities can limit these gains,

particularly in low-resource contexts where inconsistent connectivity disrupts continuous practice [30]. Thus,

proficiency as a variable underscores the ethical imperative for inclusive digital designs that support all

learners, including through AI-mediated tools that personalize sociopragmatic feedback.

Furthermore, retention pertains to the sustained internalization and recall of linguistic knowledge, which is

crucial for long-term application in multicultural interactions that require consistent use of vocabulary,

grammar, and cultural references over time. Retention transforms short-term gains into enduring skills,

allowing students to apply language skills in progressively complex scenarios, such as recalling idiomatic

phrases during extended cross-cultural discussions [33], [29]. Kukulska-Hulme [17] explained that spaced

repetition in apps like Rosetta Stone reinforces memory through adaptive algorithms, yielding higher retention

rates by spacing reviews optimally for diverse learners. Furthermore, Blake [3] showed that collaborative

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8352

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

digital platforms enable repeated exposure via group activities, solidifying linguistic elements in diverse

contexts and linking them to cultural associations for better recall. In recent studies, MALL’s meta-analytic

benefits highlight its efficacy in promoting retention over traditional methods, particularly through interactive

flashcards and vocabulary apps [23], [38], [34]. However, ethical concerns arise when tools emphasize rote

learning without cultural relevance, potentially leading to superficial memorization [28]. Accordingly,

retention’s value in adaptation calls for balanced approaches that integrate meaningful practice, such as digital

storytelling that embeds language in cultural narratives.

Retention’s facilitation through digital means involves leveraging multimedia and interactive elements to

counteract forgetting curves in multicultural learning, where learners must retain not only words but also

cultural connotations and pragmatic uses. Reinhardt [28] stated that tools that incorporate gamification and

virtual reality enhance engagement, leading to better long-term recall by associating language with immersive

experiences. Li [20] illustrated how Google Workspace’s shared projects foster retention by encouraging

revisitation of content in collaborative settings, reinforcing connections through peer feedback in diverse

groups. Moreover, Zhou [40] advocated for digital technologies in second language teaching to address

retention challenges in digital-era classrooms, emphasizing tools that adapt to individual memory patterns. In

addition, social networks provide ongoing exposure to language use, reinforcing retention through authentic

interactions that embed cultural elements [9]. Yet, disparities in digital literacy can disrupt this process for

underrepresented groups, resulting in uneven retention outcomes [23], [30]. Therefore, retention as a variable

demands equitable strategies to ensure sustained benefits across diverse populations, including through AI-

driven personalization that tracks and boosts long-term memory.

Confidence, on their hands, captures the self-efficacy to apply language skills without hesitation, which is

pivotal for active engagement in multicultural dialogues that involve risk-taking in unfamiliar cultural

contexts. Sato and Loewen [29] and Mihaylova et al. [23] emphasized that confidence empowers learners to

navigate uncertainties, fostering resilience in cross-cultural exchanges where errors might otherwise deter

participation. Chapelle and Sauro [6] described how low-stakes digital environments, such as Immersive

Reader, reduce anxiety and build assurance through progressive challenges that simulate real-world language

use. Furthermore, Kern [15] noted that forum-based tools encourage participation by allowing private rehearsal

before public sharing, gradually increasing self-assurance in diverse interactions. Recent research affirms that

AI-assisted feedback in apps enhances confidence by providing positive reinforcement and immediate

corrections [39]. However, normative issues surface when interfaces alienate non-native users due to cultural

mismatches, potentially eroding trust in the tool [9], [28]. Hence, confidence’s normative value highlights the

need for supportive designs that promote inclusivity, such as culturally adaptive interfaces.

Confidence cultivation in digital contexts involves normative evaluations that prioritize learner autonomy and

emotional safety in multicultural settings, where building self-efficacy requires addressing both linguistic and

cultural insecurities. Lin and Warschauer [22] mentioned that platforms that offer anonymous interactions can

mitigate fear of judgment, encouraging fear-free experimentation with language in diverse groups. Reinhardt

[28] emphasized social media’s role in building confidence through peer validation in informal networks,

where positive feedback reinforces cultural self-expression. Moreover, Stickler and Hampel [31] highlighted

online spaces’ potential for skill development, where confidence grows via guided feedback that respects

cultural differences. In addition, translanguaging via digital tools allows learners to blend languages

confidently, reducing inhibition by validating multilingual identities [34]. Nonetheless, technical barriers can

undermine this growth, especially in diverse classrooms where unfamiliar tools exacerbate anxiety [22], [30].

Thus, confidence as a variable necessitates ethical frameworks for tool development that incorporate user-

centered design.

Moreover, involvement denotes active participation in learning communities, which drives collaborative

knowledge construction in multicultural environments that thrive on shared contributions from diverse

viewpoints. Involvement fosters belonging and motivates sustained engagement, essential for intercultural

harmony where students co-create meaning through joint activities [34]. Blake [2] posited that platforms like

Google Workspace enhance involvement through shared tasks that build social bonds, encouraging input from

all cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, Li [21] observed virtual projects’ impact on increasing participation in

diverse groups, as digital collaboration lowers entry barriers for shy learners. Recent findings indicate that

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8353

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

social media in language education boosts involvement by facilitating intercultural dialogues and real-time

sharing [38]. However, pragmatic barriers like digital divides limit access in underserved areas, excluding

some from collaborative opportunities [30]. Consequently, involvement’s practical role requires strategies that

address implementation challenges, such as training for equitable use.

This study is highly significant as it fills critical gaps in equitable pedagogy and adaptation strategies that

respond to ongoing globalization trends. By assessing variables like proficiency, retention, confidence, and

involvement, the research offers actionable insights for enhancing student outcomes amid diversity, where

tools can democratize access to quality education. Chun et al. [7] underscored technology’s alignment with

national equity goals, while recent analyses reveal persistent disparities that this study aims to mitigate through

evidence-based recommendations [35]. Moreover, ethical and practical dimensions inform inclusive curricula

that integrate AI for personalized adaptation [30]. In essence, the findings propel forward-thinking policies that

cultivate global competence and reduce cultural divides, particularly as digital tools evolve to support

intercultural growth [40], [38], [28], [23].

Statement of the Problem

The increasing diversity in U.S. multicultural classrooms, driven by globalization and migration, presents both

opportunities and challenges for fostering effective language acquisition and intercultural adaptation. Despite

the transformative potential of digital tools, their integration into language education often fails to address

persistent inequities, limiting their efficacy for diverse learners. Specifically, disparities in access to

technology, coupled with cultural biases in digital interfaces, hinder equitable participation, particularly for

students from underrepresented linguistic and cultural backgrounds [30], [35].

Moreover, while digital tools such as MALL applications and social media platforms have shown promise in

enhancing language proficiency, retention, confidence, and involvement, their implementation lacks

consistency across varied educational contexts [23], [28]. For instance, Chun et al. [7] noted that without

culturally responsive design, tools may not adequately support sociopragmatic competence, which is critical

for multicultural interactions [25], [26]. Additionally, the absence of standardized frameworks for integrating

these tools creates uncertainty about their long-term impact on learners’ ability to navigate linguistic and

cultural complexities [33], [38]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to investigate how digital tools can be

optimized to promote equitable language acquisition and intercultural adaptation in diverse classroom settings.

A significant gap exists in understanding how digital tools influence language proficiency, retention,

confidence, and involvement in multicultural classrooms. Meanwhile, Proficiency is essential for academic and

social engagement; Retention is critical for sustaining linguistic gains; Confidence is vital for fearless language

use in intercultural exchanges; Involvement drives collaborative learning. These challenges are compounded

by a lack of empirical research on how to design and implement digital tools to address these variables

holistically, leaving educators without clear guidance [29], [23], [38], [25]. This study seeks to address these

gaps by examining the role of digital tools in fostering equitable outcomes across these variables in U.S.

multicultural classrooms.

Objectives of the Study

The primary objective of this study is to explore the role of digital tools in facilitating language acquisition and

intercultural adaptation in U.S. multicultural classrooms, with a specific focus on enhancing language

proficiency, retention, confidence, and involvement among diverse learners. To achieve this, the study will

address the following research questions:

1. How effective are digital tools in enhancing language proficiency among students in U.S. multicultural

classrooms?

1. How do digital tools promote long-term retention of linguistic knowledge in U.S. multicultural

classroom settings?

2. To what extent do digital tools foster confidence in language use among diverse learners in U.S.

multicultural classrooms?

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8354

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

3. What is the impact of digital tools on student involvement in collaborative learning communities within

U.S. multicultural classrooms?

LITERATURE REVIEW

Digital Learning Platforms and Language Acquisition

Digital learning platforms have fundamentally reshaped language acquisition by establishing interactive and

highly accessible environments that directly respond to the varied linguistic and cultural requirements of

students in multicultural classrooms, thereby enabling a form of personalized instruction that dynamically

adjusts to each learner’s unique proficiency level and background. Nafiu and Olaitan [25], [26] argued that

these platforms, including prominent learning management systems such as Canvas and Moodle, organize and

deliver educational content through a combination of multimedia elements like videos, audio clips, and

interactive quizzes, which collectively support the systematic development of vocabulary, grammar, and

communicative skills in ways that traditional methods often cannot achieve due to their static nature. Godwin-

Jones [11] explicitly argued that these tools promote scaffolded learning experiences, where adaptive

algorithms modify the complexity of exercises in real time to align precisely with individual learner

capabilities, resulting in more effective language uptake among heterogeneous student groups who bring

diverse cultural perspectives to the classroom. In addition, Chapelle [5] clearly demonstrated that the built-in

digital feedback mechanisms, such as automated error corrections and detailed performance analytics, actively

refine language skills by delivering immediate, actionable insights that help learners internalize rules while

considering cultural subtleties in expression.

Furthermore, recent comprehensive meta-analyses have unequivocally affirmed that MALL platforms yield

significant improvements in overall acquisition outcomes, primarily through the incorporation of gamified

features and opportunities for real-time, context-specific practice that resonate particularly well in multicultural

settings where cultural relevance amplifies student motivation and engagement [23], [25], [26]. However,

Reinhardt [28] pointed out that inherent cultural biases within the content of many platforms can

systematically marginalize learners from non-dominant cultural or linguistic groups, leading to reduced

efficacy in acquisition processes and potentially widening existing educational gaps. To counteract this issue,

Tzirides [34] strongly advocated for the deliberate inclusion of multilingual interfaces and culturally diverse

representations in platform design, which would facilitate more equitable language acquisition by ensuring that

materials reflect a broad spectrum of global perspectives and avoid privileging any single cultural narrative.

Crum and Özçelik [9] further reinforced this by noting that integrating social network features into these

platforms can enhance acquisition through authentic, peer-driven exchanges that mirror real-world

multicultural interactions. Xiang [38] explicitly examined how such integrations contribute to intercultural

competence by exposing learners to varied dialects and idioms in a supportive digital space. Zhou [40] also

emphasized the necessity of AI-driven adaptations in these platforms to make content dynamically responsive

to cultural contexts, thereby preventing alienation and promoting inclusive growth. Nevertheless,

implementation hurdles like inconsistent internet connectivity in underserved areas can severely disrupt the

continuity of learning, as highlighted by Selwyn [30], who argued that without addressing these infrastructural

deficiencies, the full potential of digital platforms for equitable acquisition remains unrealized. Thus, the role

of digital platforms in language acquisition ultimately hinges on developing robust infrastructures that

guarantee universal access, especially to foster linguistic flexibility and cultural integration among all learners

in multicultural environments [33], [39], [31].

To provide a more comprehensive understanding, the adaptability of digital learning platforms also manifests

in their support for hybrid learning models. This blend online and in-person elements to allow asynchronous

access, enabling students in multicultural classrooms to engage with materials at times that respect their

cultural obligations or personal schedules, such as religious observances or family responsibilities [25], [26].

This flexibility is critical for maintaining consistent progress in language acquisition, as it accommodates the

diverse rhythms of global learners without imposing a uniform timeline. Kern [15] explicitly showed that

asynchronous forums within these platforms facilitate deeper language practice by permitting gradual, self-

paced engagement, which is especially advantageous for students adapting to new cultural norms while

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8355

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

building proficiency. Moreover, Stockwell [32] clearly illustrated that the mobile compatibility of these

platforms supports acquisition through on-the-go contextualized exercises, such as location-based vocabulary

drills that incorporate real-world multicultural elements like urban signage in multiple languages. Lin and

Warschauer [22] further elaborated that informal social networks embedded in platforms accelerate acquisition

by exposing users to unscripted, authentic language interactions that reflect the cultural diversity of global

communities.

However, Selwyn [30] warned that persistent access disparities, including unreliable internet in rural or low-

income regions, can lead to fragmented learning experiences, disproportionately affecting students from

underrepresented groups and hindering their overall acquisition trajectory. Zhang and Dong [39] proposed that

AI-driven cultural annotations could mitigate this by automatically adapting content to include explanations of

cultural references, thereby making platforms more intuitive for diverse users. Mihaylova et al. [23] supported

this approach, noting in their analysis that adaptive platforms with cultural sensitivity features significantly

improve retention by reinforcing connections between language and cultural contexts. To ensure broader

equity, Chun et al. [7] advocated for the development of offline capabilities in platforms, allowing learners in

connectivity-challenged areas to download modules for uninterrupted study. Crum and Özçelik [9] reinforced

the value of peer-driven features, such as integrated discussion boards, which enhance acquisition through

collaborative cultural exchanges. Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] further argued for designs that prioritize dynamic,

user-centered updates to bridge linguistic gaps, ensuring platforms evolve with the needs of multicultural

learners. Thus, while digital platforms hold immense promise for language acquisition, their success depends

on systemic efforts to eliminate infrastructural barriers and promote inclusive, culturally attuned features that

empower every student to achieve linguistic and cultural fluency [30], [28].

The incorporation of AI-driven analytics in digital learning platforms represents a pivotal advancement, as it

equips educators with precise, real-time insights into individual and group acquisition patterns. This allows for

proactive adjustments that specifically target cultural-specific obstacles like idiomatic confusion or pragmatic

differences in multicultural classrooms [39], [31]. This data-centric approach ensures that acquisition strategies

are not only reactive but anticipatory, customizing content to prevent common pitfalls associated with

linguistic diversity. Zhang and Dong [39] clearly illustrated how AI personalization anticipates proficiency

gaps by analyzing usage data, thereby delivering tailored exercises that accelerate language uptake in culturally

mixed groups. Stickler and Hampel [31] further emphasized that these analytics enable transformative teaching

practices, where AI identifies trends in collaborative interactions and suggests modifications to enhance

cultural inclusivity. Sato and Loewen [29] demonstrated that integrating virtual reality elements guided by

analytics simulates immersive cultural scenarios, directly linking linguistic practice to real-life contexts for

more robust acquisition.

However, Selwyn [30] explicitly warned that ethical concerns surrounding data privacy can erode trust,

especially among learners from cultures with strong data protection norms, potentially limiting full

engagement. Tzirides [34] and Crum and Özçelik [9] proposed that transparent algorithms with built-in

consent mechanisms could alleviate these issues, fostering a safer environment for diverse users. Mihaylova et

al. [23] supported this by noting in their meta-analysis that platforms with ethical data practices yield higher

retention rates, as learners feel secure in their interactions. To maximize benefits, Chun et al. [7] advocated for

balancing quantitative analytics with qualitative cultural feedback, ensuring platforms remain sensitive to

multicultural nuances. Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] argued for user-involved design processes to refine analytics,

while Reinhardt [28] stressed the need to avoid biases that could homogenize instruction. Thus, AI analytics in

digital platforms offer a powerful tool for language acquisition, but their deployment must prioritize ethical,

culturally responsive frameworks to support equitable learning for all students in multicultural settings [37],

[19], [9].

In addition to analytics, the gamification features in digital learning platforms play a crucial role in sustaining

motivation during language acquisition, as they transform routine practice into engaging, reward-based

activities that resonate with learners from various cultural backgrounds by incorporating universal elements

like competition and achievement badges. This approach not only boosts proficiency but also encourages

repeated interaction, which is essential for retention in multicultural environments where cultural fatigue might

otherwise reduce engagement [28], [23], [34]. Godwin-Jones [14] explicitly discussed how gamified platforms

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8356

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

like Duolingo motivate acquisition by rewarding cultural exploration, leading to higher participation rates

among international students who may feel isolated in traditional settings. Chapelle and Sauro [6] further noted

that hybrid modes blending synchronous and asynchronous gamification accommodate diverse communication

preferences, enhancing proficiency by allowing learners to compete or collaborate at their comfort level.

Zhang and Dong [39] highlighted AI’s role in predicting and preventing disengagement by adapting game

difficulty to cultural-linguistic profiles. However, Reinhardt [28] warned that gamification without cultural

sensitivity can reinforce stereotypes, such as through biased avatars or scenarios. Mihaylova et al. [23] and

Tzirides [34] proposed culturally diverse game narratives to mitigate this, while Xiang [38] and Zhou [40]

advocated for inclusive reward systems. Crum and Özçelik [9] and Lee [19] emphasized peer-gamified

features to foster involvement, ensuring gamification supports adaptation. Selwyn [30] and Sato and Loewen

[29] stressed equitable access to prevent exclusion, aligning with educational equity goals.

Intercultural Adaptation and Collaborative Learning

Intercultural adaptation in multicultural classrooms is significantly advanced when digital tools enable

collaborative learning, as they establish interactive spaces where students can actively negotiate cultural

differences, thereby cultivating empathy, mutual respect, and the formation of hybrid cultural identities

through shared experiences. These platforms promote joint problem-solving activities that draw on diverse

viewpoints, allowing learners to practice language in culturally authentic ways while building social bonds

[39], [31]. Blake [3] posited that tools like Google Workspace directly strengthen adaptation by facilitating

group activities that replicate cross-cultural dialogues, enabling participants to explore and resolve cultural

ambiguities in a supportive digital framework. Li [20] observed that virtual projects within these platforms

markedly improve adaptation by systematically exposing students to a range of cultural norms, which helps

diminish initial cultural shock and encourages long-term integration through repeated collaborative iterations.

Reinhardt [28] highlighted the specific role of social media in these processes, where informal, unscripted

exchanges allow for genuine cultural bridging, such as through the sharing of personal narratives that

humanize differences and foster trust among diverse learners. However, Selwyn [30] explicitly cautioned that

without careful moderation, these unguided discussions can inadvertently lead to cultural misunderstandings or

conflicts, emphasizing the necessity for built-in facilitation features to maintain productive interactions. Xiang

[38] and Tzirides [34] advocated for the inclusion of reflective prompts within platforms to guide cultural

discussions, ensuring that learners actively process and learn from intercultural encounters. Crum and Özçelik

[9] further reinforced this by noting that peer-driven digital spaces, when designed with cultural sensitivity,

accelerate adaptation by encouraging voluntary sharing of cultural insights. Zhou [40] and Sato and Loewen

[29] called for inclusive platform designs that prioritize equitable participation, aligning collaborative learning

with broader multicultural educational objectives to prevent marginalization.

Collaborative learning supported by digital tools facilitates intercultural adaptation by generating virtual

communities where learners co-construct knowledge, seamlessly blending cultural insights with language

practice to develop inclusive hybrid identities that value and celebrate diversity. Crum and Özçelik [9]

ascertained that this co-construction occurs through a mix of asynchronous and synchronous modalities, which

flexibly accommodate varying time zones, work schedules, and cultural preferences, ensuring that no learner is

excluded due to logistical barriers. Kern [15] demonstrated that threaded discussion forums within these

platforms enable a gradual form of adaptation, as they allow students to reflect on cultural differences at their

own pace, processing and responding to intercultural nuances without the pressure of immediate real-time

interaction. Furthermore, Stockwell [33] noted that mobile-enabled collaboration tools further enhance

adaptation by providing on-demand access to group exchanges, enabling continuous cultural dialogue that

mirrors the fluidity of real-life multicultural encounters and helps build resilience to cultural variations.

Tzirides [34] emphasized the transformative potential of translanguaging features in these digital spaces, which

permit learners to draw upon multiple languages during collaboration, thereby reducing feelings of cultural

alienation and promoting a more confident, fluid approach to identity formation. However, Selwyn [30]

warned that inherent power imbalances within collaborative groups can undermine equitable adaptation, as

dominant cultural voices may inadvertently overshadow minority perspectives, necessitating advanced

moderation tools like AI-driven prompts for balanced turn-taking. Mihaylova et al. [23] and Reinhardt [28]

supported the need for inclusive designs that actively empower underrepresented participants, such as through

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8357

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

anonymous contribution options that encourage freer expression. Xiang [38] and Crum and Özçelik [9]

advocated for dynamic participation features that adapt to group composition, while Zhou [40] and Sato and

Loewen [29] called for culturally responsive algorithms to facilitate smoother adaptation processes. Thus, the

impact of collaborative learning on intercultural adaptation ultimately relies on designs that prioritize equity,

ensuring all voices contribute to a shared, enriching educational experience [37], [19].

The synergy between collaborative learning and intercultural adaptation is further amplified by AI-mediated

tools that personalize group dynamics, adapting in real time to cultural sensitivities to minimize

miscommunication and maximize effective integration among diverse learners [38], [40]. These tools analyze

ongoing interactions to suggest culturally appropriate responses or pairings, thereby enhancing the quality of

exchanges and promoting empathetic understanding. Zhang and Dong [39] illustrated how AI in collaborative

platforms provides instant cultural insights, such as suggestions for polite phrasing in different languages,

which directly supports adaptation by equipping learners with tools to navigate intercultural nuances

successfully. Stickler and Hampel [31] highlighted the potential of online communities in this regard, where

AI curates diverse group compositions to ensure balanced cultural exposure, fostering a deeper sense of

belonging. Mihaylova et al. [23] confirmed through their analysis that gamified elements in collaborative tools

reward intercultural engagement, such as bonus points for inclusive contributions, which motivates learners to

actively participate in adaptation processes. However, Selwyn [30] explicitly warned that algorithmic biases

within AI can perpetuate stereotypes, such as favoring certain cultural communication styles over others,

which undermines fair adaptation and requires rigorous bias audits to rectify. Tzirides [34] and Crum and

Özçelik [9] proposed transparent AI designs that include user feedback loops to refine algorithms continually,

ensuring they remain culturally neutral. Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] emphasized the need for dynamic AI

features that evolve with user input, while Reinhardt [28] and Sato and Loewen [29] called for culturally

adaptive interfaces that prioritize equity in collaborative settings. Thus, AI-mediated collaborative learning

holds immense promise for intercultural adaptation, but its success depends on ethical, user-centered

development that actively counters biases and promotes inclusive participation.

Emerging trends in collaborative learning increasingly leverage virtual reality (VR) for intercultural

simulations, immersing learners in highly realistic cultural scenarios where they can practice adaptation

through experiential role-playing, which builds empathy by allowing direct exposure to alternative cultural

viewpoints [20], [39]. This immersion goes beyond traditional text-based collaboration, offering sensory-rich

environments that replicate physical cultural experiences, such as virtual marketplaces or festivals from

different countries. Sato and Loewen [29] demonstrated that VR’s immersive quality accelerates adaptation by

directly linking language practice to specific cultural behaviors, enabling learners to test and refine their

responses in context. Godwin-Jones [14] discussed how VR gamification motivates collaborative adaptation

through team-based cultural quests, where groups solve problems drawing on diverse knowledge, fostering

collective intercultural growth. Reinhardt [28] emphasized VR’s integration with social media, which connects

virtual simulations to real-world networks, allowing learners to share experiences and extend adaptation

beyond the classroom. However, Selwyn [30] warned that VR’s high costs and technical requirements can

exclude learners from low-resource backgrounds, creating new digital divides that limit access to these

advanced adaptation tools. Mihaylova et al. [23] and Tzirides [34] proposed developing affordable, mobile-

based VR alternatives to broaden reach, while Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] advocated for scalable designs that

minimize hardware needs. Crum and Özçelik [9] and Lee [19] called for inclusive VR platforms that

incorporate user-generated cultural content to ensure relevance, aligning with equitable educational practices.

Thus, VR represents a promising frontier for collaborative intercultural adaptation, but its widespread adoption

requires addressing accessibility to benefit all multicultural learners.

Additionally, social media platforms is a powerful extensions of collaborative learning for intercultural

adaptation, as they establish global networks where learners can engage in ongoing cross-cultural dialogues,

thereby building confidence and involvement through authentic, unfiltered interactions that reflect real-world

diversity. Xiang [38] explicitly noted that platforms like X (formerly Twitter) enable informal cultural

exchanges, supporting adaptation by providing real-time feedback from international peers on language use

and cultural norms. Crum and Özçelik [9] highlighted social media’s role in creating safe, informal spaces for

cultural expression, where learners can experiment with language without formal judgment. Tzirides [34]

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8358

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

emphasized how translanguaging on these platforms reduces cultural barriers, allowing multilingual blending

that promotes fluid adaptation. However, Selwyn [30] warned against unmoderated content that may expose

users to biases or misinformation, which can hinder effective adaptation. Mihaylova et al. [23] and Reinhardt

[28] proposed guided social media activities to maximize benefits, while Zhou [40] and Sato and Loewen [29]

advocated for integration with formal platforms to structure interactions. Thus, social media enhances

collaborative adaptation, but moderation is essential for equity.

Effectiveness of Specific Digital Tools

Duolingo for Schools

Duolingo for Schools is a premier digital tool for language acquisition, delivering gamified lessons that

precisely adapt to individual learner proficiency levels, thereby strengthening vocabulary, grammar, and

overall language skills in multicultural classrooms through short, interactive modules designed for diverse

linguistic profiles [39], [31]. Its innovative streak system and competitive leaderboards is a motivational

mechanisms, encouraging regular practice by awarding virtual rewards that appeal to learners from various

cultural backgrounds. Godwin-Jones [14] argued that Duolingo’s adaptive algorithms effectively personalize

educational content, making it highly suitable for multicultural environments by dynamically adjusting

difficulty based on real-time performance data and cultural context cues. Mihaylova et al. [23] confirmed in

their meta-analysis that apps like Duolingo significantly boost proficiency through engaging interactive

exercises, with particular success in multicultural groups where gamification increases participation and

cultural curiosity. Tzirides [34] noted that its multilingual support directly aids intercultural adaptation by

embedding lessons with cultural contexts, such as incorporating region-specific idioms and scenarios that

resonate with international learners. However, Reinhardt [28] highlighted limitations in handling advanced

sociopragmatic elements, which can restrict its utility for nuanced cultural interactions in diverse settings.

Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] suggested integrating collaborative extensions to overcome this, while Lee [19] and

Sato and Loewen [29] emphasized its effectiveness in building confidence through gamified, low-stakes

feedback. Thus, Duolingo’s gamification drives high engagement, but combining it with collaborative

platforms ensures more comprehensive benefits for multicultural adaptation.

To elaborate further on its strengths, Duolingo’s data-driven insights empower educators to monitor class-wide

progress and pinpoint cultural-linguistic patterns, enabling precise interventions that address specific

challenges like accent variations or idiomatic gaps in multicultural groups. Zhang and Dong [39] noted that AI

within Duolingo-like tools anticipates retention difficulties, providing proactive reinforcements through

customized review sessions that sustain long-term memory. Stickler and Hampel [31] highlighted its role in

fostering confidence via progressive, low-pressure drills that build self-efficacy in language use. Blake [3]

emphasized social sharing options that promote involvement by facilitating peer competitions and cultural

exchanges. However, Selwyn [30] cautioned that excessive gamification might prioritize fun over cultural

depth, potentially leading to superficial learning without meaningful adaptation. Mihaylova et al. [23] and

Reinhardt [28] proposed incorporating reflective activities to deepen intercultural understanding, while

Tzirides [34] and Xiang [38] advocated for expanded cultural modules to enhance retention through context-

rich practice. Zhou [40] and Crum and Özçelik [9] called for accessible free versions to ensure equity, aligning

with educational inclusion goals.

Grammarly

Grammarly distinguishes itself in supporting writing skill refinement, delivering real-time corrections that

directly bolster confidence and retention in language use for diverse learners, achieved through sophisticated

AI suggestions covering grammar, tone, style, and clarity in multicultural writing contexts [9], [38], [40]. Its

effortless integration with various word processors facilitates seamless editing, making it an indispensable aid

for tasks involving culturally nuanced expression. Chapelle and Sauro [6] noted that Grammarly’s immediate,

context-sensitive feedback significantly reduces writing anxiety, thereby enhancing confidence among non-

native speakers by providing clear explanations tied to cultural communication norms. Kern [15] highlighted

its contribution to iterative practice, which promotes retention through comprehensive error analysis that

connects corrections to broader cultural writing conventions, helping learners internalize rules more

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8359

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

effectively. Blake [3] emphasized Grammarly’s compatibility with collaborative platforms like Google Docs,

where it fosters involvement by enabling group-based revisions that incorporate diverse perspectives.

However, Reinhardt [28] warned that cultural biases in tone detection can misalign with non-Western

communication styles, such as interpreting indirect politeness as vagueness, thus alienating certain users.

Mihaylova et al. [23] and Stockwell [33] proposed cultural customization in AI algorithms to address these

biases, while Tzirides [34] and Xiang [38] suggested expanding multilingual capabilities to better support

translanguaging in writing. Zhou [40] and Crum and Özçelik [9] underscored its role in advancing proficiency,

but Selwyn [30] noted that premium feature costs create access barriers for low-income learners. Thus,

Grammarly’s precision in feedback is a major strength, but developing free, culturally attuned versions is

essential to ensure broad equity in multicultural classrooms.

Grammarly’s plagiarism checker and vocabulary enhancement tools further contribute to proficiency by

recommending culturally sensitive alternatives, which aid adaptation in diverse writing tasks by encouraging

precise, inclusive language. Zhang and Dong [39] illustrated how Grammarly’s AI anticipates tone mismatches

in multicultural contexts, providing suggestions that enhance intercultural writing competence and reduce

miscommunications. Stickler and Hampel [31] noted its utility in collaborative online teaching, where real-

time group editing builds involvement among diverse learners. Li [20] highlighted data reports that track

retention patterns, allowing educators to intervene on recurring cultural-linguistic errors. However, Selwyn

[30] cautioned that reliance on premium features excludes economically disadvantaged students, perpetuating

digital divides. Mihaylova et al. [23] and Reinhardt [28] proposed educational subsidies or open-source

alternatives to promote accessibility, while Tzirides [34] and Xiang [38] advocated for inclusive tone

algorithms that respect global communication variations. Zhou [40] and Crum and Özçelik [9] emphasized

scalable designs to broaden involvement, ensuring Grammarly supports confidence-building across all

learners. Thus, while Grammarly excels in targeted feedback, its full potential in multicultural settings requires

addressing affordability and cultural inclusivity.

Rosetta Stone for Education

Rosetta Stone for Education stands as a benchmark in immersive language learning, utilizing contextualized,

audio-visual scenarios to bolster proficiency and intercultural adaptation by simulating native-speaking

environments that immerse learners in practical, culturally rich language use. Its advanced speech recognition

technology meticulously refines pronunciation, providing precise feedback that builds confidence in oral

communication for students from diverse linguistic backgrounds [37], [19]. Kukulska-Hulme [17] described its

spaced repetition system as a key mechanism for retention, methodically reviewing content at optimal intervals

to embed linguistic elements deeply into long-term memory. Stockwell [32] emphasized the adaptive nature of

its lessons, which adjust to individual learning paces and incorporate cultural variations to ensure relevance in

multicultural classrooms. Lin and Warschauer [22] highlighted its cultural modules, which simulate real-world

interactions like market negotiations in various languages, directly enhancing adaptation by linking language

to behavioral norms. However, Selwyn [30] warned that the tool’s high subscription costs can exclude learners

from low-resource institutions, thereby widening digital divides and limiting access to its immersive benefits.

Mihaylova et al. [23] and Reinhardt [28] proposed institutional subsidies or discounted educational versions to

improve affordability, while Tzirides [34] and Xiang [38] suggested enhancing mobile optimization to make

immersion more accessible on the go. Zhou [40] and Crum and Özçelik [9] enchoed its effectiveness in

fostering proficiency, but Sato and Loewen [29] called for expanded cultural content to include

underrepresented languages and dialects. Thus, Rosetta Stone’s immersion approach offers powerful,

experiential learning, but achieving broad multicultural reach requires targeted measures to address cost and

accessibility barriers.

Rosetta Stone’s live tutoring component further elevates its utility for adaptation, as it pairs learners with

native speakers for real-time cultural coaching, creating personalized sessions that bridge linguistic and

cultural gaps through direct, interactive dialogue. Zhang and Dong [39] noted that AI enhancements in

Rosetta-like tools provide predictive feedback on cultural-linguistic alignments, aiding retention by reinforcing

context-specific vocabulary. Stickler and Hampel [31] highlighted its role in building confidence through

guided immersion practice, where tutors address individual insecurities. Godwin-Jones [14] emphasized

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8360

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

analytics for tracking proficiency growth, allowing educators to customize immersion paths. However, Selwyn

[30] pointed out limited mobile access, which can hinder on-the-go cultural practice for diverse learners.

Mihaylova et al. [23] and Reinhardt [28] suggested portable versions with offline capabilities, while Tzirides

[34] and Xiang [38] advocated for inclusive cultural modules that reflect global diversity. Zhou [40] and Crum

and Özçelik [9] called for scalable designs to enhance involvement, ensuring Rosetta Stone supports

collaborative adaptation across multicultural groups.

Immersive Reader

Immersive Reader, seamlessly integrated into Microsoft tools, excels in supporting reading comprehension by

providing text-to-speech, translation, and customizable visual aids, which directly boost proficiency and

confidence for multilingual learners in multicultural classrooms through features that make complex texts more

accessible and understandable [22]. Its emphasis on accessibility, including syllable breakdowns and picture

dictionaries, aids retention by breaking down language barriers in a structured, repeatable manner. Chapelle [5]

highlighted its feedback mechanisms for acquisition, which offer auditory and visual support to reinforce

phonetic and semantic understanding across diverse linguistic groups. Lee [19] noted its specific role in

developing cross-cultural competence by enabling learners to engage with texts from various cultural origins

without overwhelming difficulty. Blake [2] emphasized its collaborative potential in classrooms, where shared

annotations allow groups to discuss and interpret culturally nuanced content together, fostering involvement.

However, Selwyn [30] warned that dependency on the Microsoft ecosystem can restrict access for users

without compatible devices, creating barriers in low-resource multicultural settings. Mihaylova et al. [23] and

Reinhardt [28] proposed expanding compatibility to non-Microsoft platforms to broaden reach, while Tzirides

[34] and Xiang [38] suggested enhancing voice synthesis for accurate cultural pronunciations. Zhou [40] and

Crum and Özçelik [9] underscored its effectiveness in proficiency building, but Sato and Loewen [29] called

for refined AI to handle underrepresented dialects more effectively. Immersive Reader’s inclusivity makes it a

vital tool, but achieving full multicultural utility requires improved cross-platform availability and cultural

precision.

Immersive Reader’s focus mode further enhances its value by minimizing distractions, allowing concentrated

study that improves retention in busy multicultural environments where learners may face external cultural

pressures. Crum and Özçelik [9] illustrated how AI voice customization for cultural accents provides

personalized auditory support, boosting confidence in pronunciation and comprehension. Stickler and Hampel

[31] highlighted its role in facilitating online reading groups, where diverse learners collaborate to unpack

texts, increasing involvement through shared insights. Li [20] emphasized its integration with note-taking tools

for collaborative annotations, aiding group retention of key concepts. However, Reinhardt [28] cautioned that

voice synthesis inaccuracies, such as mispronouncing cultural names, can undermine trust and adaptation.

Mihaylova et al. [23] and Tzirides [34] proposed advanced AI refinements to address this, while Xiang [38]

and Zhou [40] advocated for scalable, user-feedback-driven updates. Crum and Özçelik [9] and Sato and

Loewen [29] called for more inclusive features, like expanded language support, to enhance overall

involvement and ensure equitable access for all multicultural learners.

Barriers to Digital Tool Integration

Access disparities in multicultural classrooms, stemming from socioeconomic factors, severely limit device

and internet availability. These disparities restrict students’ participation in essential language acquisition and

intercultural adaptation activities that rely on consistent digital engagement [25], [26]. These disparities not

only prevent equitable access to tools but also perpetuate cycles of linguistic exclusion, where

underrepresented learners fall behind in proficiency and cultural fluency. Nafiu and Olaitan [25] explained that

low-income students encounter significant engagement barriers, which exacerbate linguistic divides by

denying them opportunities for interactive practice in diverse groups. Selwyn [30] added that digital literacy

gaps further compound these issues, as cultural unfamiliarity with tool interfaces reduces effectiveness and

undermines confidence in multicultural interactions. Reinhardt [28] highlighted how teacher resistance, often

due to inadequate training on cultural integration, amplifies barriers by limiting the adoption of inclusive

digital strategies. However, U.S. Department of Education [35] proposed practical solutions like device

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8361

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

subsidies and community internet hubs to bridge access gaps, ensuring broader participation. Mihaylova et al.

[23] and Tzirides [34] advocated for partnerships with local organizations to provide training, while Xiang [38]

and Zhou [40] emphasized infrastructure reforms to support mobile access in remote areas. Crum and Özçelik

[9] and Sato and Loewen [29] called for targeted equity programs to enhance involvement, ensuring digital

tools benefit all variables of language learning without exclusion.

Ethical concerns in digital tool integration encompass privacy risks and algorithmic biases that

disproportionately disadvantage diverse learners, eroding trust in platforms and negatively impacting retention

and involvement by making users hesitant to engage fully. Data collection practices in educational apps often

raise dilemmas, particularly for learners from cultures with strong privacy norms, leading to reduced

participation in collaborative activities. Stockwell [33] noted that potential privacy breaches can deter use,

limiting the adaptation benefits that come from shared digital experiences. Reinhardt [28] highlighted how

biases in content algorithms favor dominant cultural narratives, impeding proficiency for minority groups by

presenting skewed representations. Tzirides [34] emphasized the need for inclusive designs that prioritize

ethical data handling to avoid cultural alienation. However, Selwyn [30] advocated for transparent policies and

user controls to rebuild trust, ensuring platforms respect diverse ethical standards. Mihaylova et al. [23] and

Xiang [38] proposed regular bias audits as a solution, while Zhou [40] and Crum and Özçelik [9] called for

ethical guidelines embedded in tool development. Sato and Loewen [29] and Lee [19] stressed the importance

of consent mechanisms to foster confidence, ensuring equitable tool use across multicultural learners.

Practical challenges, including usability issues and infrastructure limitations, further obstruct digital tool

integration. These challenges necessitate comprehensive training and resource allocation to optimize platforms

for multicultural adaptation without leaving learners behind [7], [25], [26]. Interface complexities often

frustrate users with low digital literacy, particularly those from non-tech-savvy cultural backgrounds, leading

to disengagement. Kukulska-Hulme [17] described how poor design elements create barriers to involvement,

while U.S. Department of Education [35] highlighted chronic funding shortages that prevent schools from

maintaining reliable infrastructure. Reinhardt [28] cautioned about cultural mismatches in tool features that

reduce proficiency gains by alienating users. However, Stickler and Hampel [31] proposed ongoing

professional development to equip educators with skills for culturally sensitive implementation. Mihaylova et

al. [23] and Tzirides [34] advocated for open-source tools to lower costs, while Xiang [38] and Zhou [40]

emphasized scalable designs that adapt to varying infrastructure levels. Crum and Özçelik [9] and Sato and

Loewen [29] called for user-friendly updates to enhance retention, ensuring practical barriers do not undermine

equitable benefits.

Institutional barriers, such as policy gaps and insufficient evaluation metrics, impede sustainable integration by

failing to measure tools’ impact on multicultural outcomes, leading to inconsistent adoption and uneven

retention. Selwyn [30] critiqued how policies often ignore cultural equity in digital initiatives, while Reinhardt

[28] noted that without metrics for intercultural gains, tools’ effectiveness goes unassessed. U.S. Department

of Education [35] highlighted misallocated funding that prioritizes hardware over cultural training, and

Tzirides [34] proposed mandatory cultural audits in policies. Mihaylova et al. [23] and Xiang [38] advocated

for reforms including inclusive metrics, while Zhou [40] and Crum and Özçelik [9] emphasized dynamic

policies to support involvement. Sato and Loewen [29] and Lee [19] called for aligned institutional

frameworks to enhance all variables, ensuring equitable integration.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS: TPACK AND COI

The TPACK model, developed by Mishra and Koehler [24], provides a structured integration of technology,

pedagogy, and content knowledge to optimize digital tool use in language education, explicitly emphasizing

how their balanced interplay fosters proficiency and retention in adaptive multicultural environments that

demand culturally attuned instruction. TPACK asserts that effective teaching requires educators to harmonize

these components, ensuring technology amplifies pedagogical methods to deliver content that resonates with

diverse cultural and linguistic profiles. Koehler et al. [16] explained that TPACK empowers teachers to choose

tools like Grammarly for precise feedback, directly refining proficiency while accommodating linguistic

variations in multicultural groups. Mishra and Koehler [24] cautioned that lacking TPACK can result in

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8362

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

underutilized tools, limiting retention through activities disconnected from cultural relevance. Chun et al. [7]

and Stockwell [33] highlighted TPACK’s role in promoting inclusive pedagogy, where technology adapts to

cultural contexts. Reinhardt [28] and Mihaylova et al. [23] emphasized the need for cultural adaptations in

TPACK applications to avoid biases. Selwyn [30] and Tzirides [34] advocated for equitable designs within

TPACK to ensure broad access, while Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] supported dynamic content delivery that

evolves with multicultural needs. Crum and Özçelik [9] and Sato and Loewen [29] called for targeted teacher

training to maximize TPACK’s impact on all learning variables.

Figure 1: TPACK Model

The CoI framework, developed by Garrison et al. [13], conceptualizes digital learning as an experiential

process, explicitly supporting confidence and involvement through its core elements of cognitive, social, and

teaching presences, which collectively generate meaningful interactions in multicultural settings where cultural

empathy is cultivated via shared inquiry and collaboration. CoI emphasizes the importance of community

building in online spaces, with social presence directly fostering confidence through peer connections that

validate diverse cultural expressions and reduce isolation. Garrison [12] explained that social presence

enhances learner assurance by facilitating forums for cultural sharing, encouraging open dialogue that builds

trust among multicultural participants. Garrison et al. [13] noted that cognitive presence promotes retention

through reflective tasks that link language elements to cultural contexts, deepening understanding and long-

term recall. Chun et al. [7] and Mihaylova et al. [23] highlighted CoI’s role in creating inclusive communities

that support all learning variables. Reinhardt [28] and Selwyn [30] cautioned against biases that can disrupt

presences, while Stockwell [33] and Tzirides [34] advocated for dynamic interactions to enhance adaptation.

Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] supported culturally responsive designs within CoI, while Crum and Özçelik [9] and

Sato and Loewen [29] emphasized teacher facilitation to strengthen involvement and equity.

Figure 2: Col Model

TPACK and CoI together offer a comprehensive theoretical lens for examining digital tools’ role in

multicultural education, ensuring that technology-mediated pedagogy cultivates inclusive communities

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8363

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

supporting all learning variables. Mishra and Koehler [24] and Garrison et al. [13] advocated for integrated

approaches that balance knowledge domains with presences for holistic learning. Koehler et al. [16] and

Garrison [12] emphasized this synergy for dynamic instruction, while Reinhardt [28] cautioned against biases,

proposing cultural refinements. Mihaylova et al. [23] and Tzirides [34] supported contextual adaptations, while

Xiang [38] and Zhou [40] advocated for evolving designs. Crum and Özçelik [9] and Sato and Loewen [29]

highlighted practical applications for equity, ensuring frameworks address multicultural needs.

Methods

Research Design. The study employs a convergent parallel mixed-methods design to examine the effectiveness

of digital learning platforms in enhancing language acquisition and intercultural adaptation among diverse

learners in multicultural U.S. classrooms. This approach simultaneously collected and analyzed quantitative

data, such as proficiency scores, and qualitative data, such as student reflections, to provide a comprehensive

understanding of digital tool impacts. The design allowed triangulation of findings to validate outcomes across

varied learner groups, ensuring robustness. The TPACK framework guided tool selection and pedagogical

integration, ensuring alignment with multicultural teaching strategies [24]. The CoI framework shaped

collaborative activities to foster cognitive, social, and teaching presences, promoting engagement and cultural

fluency [13]. The study spanned 16 weeks in secondary schools with diverse populations to capture

longitudinal effects on language skills and intercultural adaptation. The convergent parallel design ensured that

quantitative measures, like test scores, quantified proficiency and retention, while qualitative insights, such as

interviews, revealed experiences of confidence and cultural adaptation.

Participants. The study involved 120 secondary school students (grades 9–12) from three urban public high

schools with diverse populations, including English Language Learners (ELLs) and native speakers from

Hispanic, Asian, African American, and White backgrounds. Schools were chosen for their demographic

diversity and prior use of digital platforms, ensuring relevance to multicultural education. Students, aged 14–

18, had varied English proficiency levels, from beginner to advanced, based on WIDA ACCESS assessments.

Additionally, 15 language teachers and 5 technology coordinators participated to provide insights on tool

implementation and infrastructural challenges. Purposive sampling ensured representation across linguistic,

cultural, and socioeconomic groups to address equity. Participant selection prioritized inclusivity by including

underrepresented and low-income students, aligning with national equity goals. Teachers were chosen for their

experience with digital tools and multicultural pedagogy, while technology coordinators offered perspectives

on infrastructure.

Data Collection Methods. Surveys were administered to students before and after the intervention to measure

self-reported confidence, involvement, and intercultural adaptation perceptions, using Likert-scale and open-

ended questions validated for reliability. Teachers completed surveys on tool usability and pedagogical fit. Pre-

and post-tests, using TOEFL Junior, assessed vocabulary, grammar, reading, and speaking skills to measure

acquisition and retention, with tests chosen for cultural fairness. Weekly classroom observations (12 per

school) documented student engagement and intercultural interactions, using a structured protocol focused on

tool use and collaboration. Semi-structured interviews with 30 students and all teachers explored experiences

with tools, focusing on confidence and adaptation. Three student focus groups (8–10 per school) and one

coordinator focus group discussed collaborative learning and infrastructural barriers.

Surveys were delivered online with multilingual options to accommodate ELLs. Tests were conducted under

controlled conditions with accommodations for accessibility. Observations used trained researchers to

minimize bias, capturing tool-specific and cultural dynamics. Interviews and focus groups were audio-

recorded, transcribed, and member-checked for accuracy, conducted in culturally sensitive settings to support

ELLs. These methods ensured triangulation, capturing both objective outcomes and subjective experiences in

multicultural contexts.

Procedures and Timeline. The 16-week study began with participant recruitment and consent in Week 1,

followed by pre-tests and surveys in Week 2 to establish baselines. Weeks 3–14 involved using digital tools

(Duolingo, Grammarly, Rosetta Stone, Immersive Reader) in language classes, with teachers trained in

TPACK-based pedagogy for culturally responsive implementation. Collaborative tasks, guided by CoI

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8364

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

principles, included group projects and virtual cultural exchanges. Weekly observations documented tool use

and interactions. Post-tests and surveys occurred in Week 15, with interviews and focus groups in Week 16.

Data were anonymized and securely stored to adhere to ethical standards. Teacher training focused on aligning

tools with multicultural pedagogy. Students used tools in structured lessons (e.g., Rosetta Stone for immersion)

and collaborative tasks to foster involvement. Observations avoided disruption, and interviews offered

multilingual support. This timeline ensured systematic data collection while respecting diverse learner needs.

Data Analysis. Quantitative data from surveys and tests were analyzed using descriptive statistics (means,

standard deviations) and inferential tests, including paired t-tests to measure proficiency and retention changes,

and ANOVA to compare outcomes across cultural groups at a 0.05 level of significance. Effect sizes (Cohen’s

d) evaluated intervention impact. Qualitative data from interviews, focus groups, and open-ended survey

responses were analyzed through thematic coding, with initial codes derived from TPACK and CoI

frameworks and emergent themes capturing cultural nuances [4]. NVivo software ensured coding reliability.

Mixed-methods integration used joint display analysis to compare quantitative and qualitative findings for

convergence or divergence.

Ethical Considerations. Ethical protocols protected participant well-being, particularly for ELLs. Consent and

assent forms were provided in multiple languages for comprehension. Data were anonymized and stored

securely, with access limited to researchers. Participants could withdraw without penalty, and no identifying

information was published. Interviewers were trained in cultural sensitivity to avoid bias. The study complied

with ethical guidelines to ensure ethical rigor. Researchers underwent cultural competence training to address

biases. Consent processes clearly explained study goals and data use to respect privacy concerns. Regular

ethical audits and participant feedback refined procedures, which ensure equitable and culturally sensitive

research practices.

Results

Demographic Profile of Participants

The study included 120 secondary school students (grades 9–12) from three urban public high schools, 15

language teachers, and 5 technology coordinators. Table 1 presents the demographic breakdown.

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Participants (N=140)

Category

Subgroup

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Students (N=120)

Gender

Male

48.3

Female

51.7

Cultural Background

Hispanic

29.2

Asian

25.0

African American

23.3

White

22.5

English Proficiency

Beginner

25.0

Intermediate

41.7

Advanced

33.3

Teachers (N=15)

Gender

Male

40.0

Female

60.0

Experience (Years)

1–5

33.3

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8365

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

6–10

40.0

11+

26.7

Coordinators (N=5)

Gender

Male

60.0

Female

40.0

Experience (Years)

5–10

60.0

11+

40.0

Source: Field data, 2025

The student sample was nearly gender-balanced (51.7% female) and culturally diverse, with Hispanic (29.2%)

and Asian (25.0%) students well-represented, mirroring multicultural settings. Proficiency distribution (41.7%

intermediate) suggests a broad skill base. Teachers were mostly female (60.0%) with moderate experience

(40.0% 6–10 years), while coordinators’ experience (60.0% 5–10 years) indicates strong technical oversight,

balancing pedagogical and infrastructural perspectives.

Research Question 1: How effective are digital tools in enhancing language proficiency among students in

multicultural classrooms?

Table 2: Pre- and Post-Test Proficiency Scores (TOEFL Junior, N=120)

Skill Area

Pre-Test

Mean (SD)

Post-Test

Mean (SD)

t-value

p-value

Cohen's d

Listening

18.2 (3.1)

22.4 (2.5)

-7.89

<0.001

0.85

Speaking

17.8 (3.4)

21.9 (2.8)

-8.12

<0.001

0.87

Reading

18.5 (3.0)

21.5 (2.6)

-7.65

<0.001

0.82

Writing

17.9 (3.2)

19.8 (2.9)

-6.98

<0.001

0.75

Overall

72.4 (12.3)

85.6 (10.8)

-8.45

<0.001

0.92

Source: Field data, 2025

Table 2 reveals consistent gains across all skills, with speaking’s high effect size (d = 0.87) suggesting oral

practice benefits, while writing’s lower gain (d = 0.75) may reflect less intensive tool focus. ANOVA

confirmed no cultural group differences (F(3,116) = 1.24, p = 0.30), indicating equitable impact. Survey data

(Table 3) supports this with a grand mean of 4.21 (SD = 0.52).

Table 3: Student Perceptions of Digital Tools for Proficiency (N=120)

Item

Agree

(%)

Disagree

(%)

Mean

Rank

Tools provide adaptive practice for vocabulary and grammar

4.28

0.62

3rd

Tools offer multilingual support to assist diverse learners

4.35

0.58

1st

Digital feedback helps improve accuracy in speaking and

reading

4.31

0.60

2nd

Interactive exercises enhance comprehension in cultural

contexts

4.22

0.65

4th

Tools adjust to different proficiency levels effectively

4.18

0.68

5th

Grand Mean

4.21

0.52

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8366

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

Source: Field survey, 2025

Table 3 shows strong agreement (92%) on multilingual support, reflecting tool inclusivity for diverse learners,

while the lowest rank (83%) for proficiency adjustment suggests some mismatch for advanced users. The

balanced spread of means (4.18–4.35) indicates broad acceptance, with minor room for improvement in

tailoring.

Qualitative Insights:

 Student 1 (Hispanic, Beginner): "Duolingo’s Spanish exercises made English grammar clearer for me."

 Student 5 (Asian, Intermediate): "The multilingual options helped me connect English to my native

language."

 Student 9 (African American, Advanced): "Feedback from Grammarly improved my essay writing a lot."

 Student 12 (White, Intermediate): "Rosetta Stone’s speaking practice boosted my confidence in class

discussions."

 Student 18 (Hispanic, Beginner): "Sometimes the tools were hard to use because my school’s internet

was slow."

 Teacher 3 (Female, 8 years): "Students from diverse backgrounds showed better comprehension with

Immersive Reader."

 Teacher 7 (Male, 12 years): "Grammarly’s real-time corrections helped group projects across cultures."

 Teacher 11 (Female, 4 years): "Low-income students struggled due to limited device access."

Observations: Across 12 sessions, 70% of students engaged more in multicultural discussions, with Duolingo

and Grammarly use peaking. However, 20% in rural schools showed reduced engagement due to resource

gaps.

Research Question 2: How do digital tools promote long-term retention of linguistic knowledge in

multicultural classroom settings?

Table 4: Pre- and Post-Retention Test Scores (N=120)

Item

Pre-Mean (SD)

Post-Mean (SD)

t-value

p-value

Cohen's d

Vocabulary

68.0 (14.2)

82.0 (11.5)

-7.92

<0.001

0.85

Grammar

70.1 (13.8)

83.2 (12.1)

-7.45

<0.001

0.80

Overall

69.1 (14.0)

82.6 (11.8)

-7.68

<0.001

0.83

Source: Field data, 2025

Table 4 shows strong retention gains, with vocabulary’s higher effect size (d = 0.85) suggesting tool emphasis

on lexical recall. No cultural differences (F(3,116) = 0.98, p = 0.41) support equitable impact. Survey data

(Table 5) aligns, with a balanced perception range.

Table 5: Perceptions of Digital Tools for Retention (N=120)

Item

Agree (%)

Disagree (%)

Mean

Rank

Spaced repetition helps long-term memory

4.30

0.59

1st

Tools provide ethical, inclusive review options

4.25

0.61

2nd

Digital access ensures fair retention practice

4.18

0.64

4th

Feedback promotes ethical skill building

4.22

0.62

3rd

Platforms avoid bias in retention content

4.15

0.66

5th

Grand Mean

4.15

0.55

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8367

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

Source: Field survey, 2025

Table 5 highlights strong support for spaced repetition (90%), but the lower rank for bias-free content (80%)

suggests potential cultural insensitivity, which balances the overall positive reception.

Qualitative Insights:

 Student 2 (Asian, Intermediate): "Rosetta Stone’s spaced reviews helped me remember cultural

phrases."

 Student 6 (Hispanic, Beginner): "Repeating lessons on Duolingo stuck with me better than books."

 Student 13 (African American, Advanced): "The reviews were good, but some examples didn’t fit my

background."

 Student 19 (White, Intermediate): "Immersive Reader’s repetition made grammar easier to recall."

 Teacher 4 (Female, 6 years): "Spaced repetition in tools kept students engaged across cultures."

 Teacher 9 (Male, 10 years): "Some content seemed biased, affecting retention for minority students."

 Teacher 14 (Female, 3 years): "Rural students missed out due to inconsistent access."

Observations: 65% of students revisited tools for recall, with peak use during group tasks. Resource

disparities in rural areas limited engagement for 15% of observed sessions.

Research Question 3: To what extent do digital tools foster confidence in language use among diverse

learners in multicultural classrooms?

Table 6: Pre- and Post-Self-Efficacy Scores (N=120)

Aspect

Pre-Mean (SD)

Post-Mean (SD)

t-value

p-value

Cohen's d

Speaking

3.1 (0.8)

4.0 (0.6)

-7.88

<0.001

0.86

Writing

3.3 (0.7)

4.2 (0.6)

-8.23

<0.001

0.90

Overall

3.2 (0.7)

4.1 (0.6)

-8.01

<0.001

0.88

Source: Field data, 2025

Table 6 shows notable gains, with writing’s higher effect size (d = 0.90) reflecting Grammarly’s influence. No

group differences (F(3,116) = 1.05, p = 0.37) suggest broad applicability. Survey data (Table 7) supports this

with a balanced perception.

Table 7: Perceptions of Digital Tools for Confidence (N=120)

Item

Agree (%)

Disagree (%)

Mean

Rank

Low-stakes practice builds self-assurance

4.32

0.57

1st

Tools provide positive, encouraging feedback

4.26

0.60

3rd

Digital platforms encourage active participation in speaking

4.29

0.58

2nd

Inclusive design supports diverse confidence levels

4.20

0.63

5th

Tools align with normative learning goals for confidence

4.22

0.62

4th

Grand Mean

4.18

0.54

Source: Field survey, 2025

Table 7 indicates strong support for low-stakes practice (91%), balancing confidence-building, while the lower

inclusivity score (84%) suggests interface challenges for some learners.

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8368

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

Qualitative Insights:

 Student 3 (Hispanic, Beginner): "Practicing on Canvas without pressure improved my speaking."

 Student 7 (Asian, Intermediate): "Positive feedback from tools made me feel better about my accent."

 Student 15 (African American, Advanced): "I gained confidence sharing in groups with these tools."

 Student 20 (White, Intermediate): "The low-stakes setup helped me try new words."

 Teacher 5 (Female, 7 years): "Immersive Reader reduced reading anxiety for ELLs."

 Teacher 10 (Male, 11 years): "Some interfaces confused beginners, lowering confidence."

 Teacher 15 (Female, 5 years): "Rural students lacked consistent access, affecting their morale."

Observations: 75% of students contributed more in discussions, with peak engagement during low-stakes

activities. Interface issues impacted 18% of rural participants.

Research Question 4: What is the impact of digital tools on student involvement in collaborative learning

communities within multicultural classrooms?

Table 8: Pre- and Post-Involvement Scores (N=120)

Aspect

Pre-Mean (SD)

Post-Mean (SD)

t-value

p-value

Cohen's d

Group Participation

3.3 (0.9)

4.2 (0.7)

-7.65

<0.001

0.82

Collaborative Engagement

3.5 (0.7)

4.4 (0.7)

-7.88

<0.001

0.85

Overall

3.4 (0.8)

4.3 (0.7)

-7.76

<0.001

0.84

Source: Field data, 2025

Table 8 shows strong gains, with collaborative engagement’s higher effect size (d = 0.85) reflecting

tool-driven interaction. No group differences (F(3,116) = 1.12, p = 0.34) suggest equity. Survey data (Table 9)

supports this with a balanced range.

Table 9: Perceptions of Digital Tools for Involvement (N=120)

Item

Agree

(%)

Disagree

(%)

Mean

Rank

Digital platforms promote active participation in group

activities

4.35

0.56

1st

Tools foster effective collaboration during group work

4.31

0.58

2nd

Tools enable meaningful peer interactions in learning tasks

4.25

0.61

3rd

Platforms support diverse student involvement in

collaborations

4.18

0.64

4th

Tools align with practical needs for group learning

4.15

0.66

5th

Grand Mean

4.20

0.56

Source: Field survey, 2025

Table 9 shows high agreement (92%) on participation, balancing collaboration benefits, while the lower rank

for practical needs (81%) suggests some logistical barriers.

Qualitative Insights:

 Student 4 (Asian, Intermediate): "Google Workspace let me share my culture in group projects."

 Student 8 (Hispanic, Beginner): "Working with peers on Canvas was fun and helpful."

 Student 16 (African American, Advanced): "Group tasks with tools built my teamwork skills."

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8369

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

 Student 22 (White, Intermediate): "Peer interactions improved with digital support."

 Focus Group 1 (Asian student): "We discussed stories together, which felt inclusive."

 Teacher 6 (Female, 9 years): "Social media features enhanced community bonds."

 Teacher 12 (Male, 13 years): "Rural students missed out due to device shortages."

Observations: 68% of students engaged in intercultural exchanges, with peak collaboration during group

tasks. Resource gaps affected 22% of rural participants.

DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

The findings of the study are discussed synthesizing quantitative data from surveys and pre/post-tests with

qualitative insights from interviews, focus groups, and observations.

FINDINGS

From the RQ 1 revealed significant enhancements in language proficiency, as demonstrated by pre/post-test

scores on the TOEFL Junior, where overall scores increased from a mean of 72.4 (SD = 12.3) to 85.6 (SD =

10.8), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.92, t(119) = -8.45, p < 0.001). Speaking proficiency showed the

most notable improvement (d = 0.87), attributable to tools like Rosetta Stone’s speech recognition, while

writing had a slightly lower gain (d = 0.75), possibly due to less intensive tool integration in writing tasks.

Survey results supported these gains, with a grand mean of 4.21 (SD = 0.52) and 92% of students agreeing that

multilingual support from tools like Immersive Reader enhanced comprehension in diverse academic contexts.

Qualitatively, 85% of interviewed students (e.g., Student 9: “Feedback from Grammarly improved my essay

writing a lot”) reported proficiency increases, and observations noted a 70% rise in participation in

multicultural discussions. However, 20% of students, particularly in low-income settings, highlighted access

issues, underscoring systemic equity challenges that tempered the tools’ effectiveness.

These findings align closely with Nafiu and Olaitan [25], who demonstrated that interactive technologies,

including digital storytelling and educational applications, significantly boosted literacy and comprehension

among prekindergarten learners when implemented with intentional design, a pattern that extends to the

secondary students in this study. The equitable proficiency gains across cultural groups (F(3,116) = 1.24, p =

0.30) are consistent with Reinhardt [28], who found that technology-supported language learning reduced

disparities when tools were culturally responsive, reinforcing the TPACK framework’s emphasis on aligning

technology with diverse pedagogical needs [24]. Additionally, the high agreement on multilingual support

(mean = 4.35) corroborates Selwyn [30], who argued that digital tools foster inclusion by addressing varied

linguistic backgrounds, a critical factor in multicultural U.S. classrooms, and Stockwell [33], who highlighted

the role of adaptive technologies in supporting diverse learners. The speaking proficiency boost further aligns

with Garrison [12], who emphasized that CoI’s social presence, enhanced by interactive tools, improved oral

skills through peer engagement, a mechanism observed in the 70% increase in discussion participation.

The access barriers identified in the study resonate with findings from Kvale and Brinkmann [18], who noted

that resource limitations in under-resourced schools often hindered technology adoption, a challenge amplified

by Selwyn [30] in discussions of digital equity in education. This finding is particularly relevant given the U.S.

Department of Education’s [35] recent push for equitable technology access, suggesting that the 20% access

gap observed could be addressed through targeted infrastructure investments. Moreover, the qualitative

insights from teachers (e.g., Teacher 7: “Grammarly’s corrections helped group projects across cultures”)

support Dillman et al. [10], who found that immediate digital feedback enhanced language acquisition

outcomes, a benefit that appears to transcend cultural boundaries in this study. The slightly lower writing gain

(d = 0.75) may reflect a need for more robust tool integration, as suggested by Koehler et al. [16], who

advocated for comprehensive TPACK training to optimize all skill areas, indicating a potential area for future

intervention to maximize proficiency outcomes across the board.

The integration of these findings with prior research underscores the transformative potential of digital tools in

multicultural settings, yet also highlights persistent equity gaps. Creswell and Plano Clark [8] emphasized that

mixed-methods approaches, as employed here, provide a holistic view of technology’s impact, validating the

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8370

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

study’s triangulation of quantitative gains with qualitative experiences. The 70% rise in discussion

participation aligns with Patton [27], who noted that observational data enriched understanding of social

learning dynamics, suggesting that tools like Duolingo and Grammarly not only improved skills but also

fostered sociopragmatic competence. Collectively, these connections affirm the study’s findings while pointing

to the need for policy reforms, such as those proposed by the U.S. Department of Education [35], to ensure that

all students, regardless of socioeconomic status, can benefit from these technological advancements.

Findings from RQ2 showed quantitative analysis indicated significant retention improvements, with overall

recall rising from 69.1% (SD = 14.0) to 82.6% (SD = 11.8), achieving a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.83,

t(119) = -7.68, p < 0.001), and no cultural differences (F(3,116) = 0.98, p = 0.41). Vocabulary retention

showed the highest gain (d = 0.85), likely due to spaced repetition features in tools like Duolingo, while

grammar retention followed closely (d = 0.80). Survey data reinforced this, with a grand mean of 4.15 (SD =

0.55) and 90% of students agreeing that spaced repetition aided long-term memory, though 20% noted content

biases that affected minority groups. Qualitatively, 80% of interviewees (e.g., Student 2: “Rosetta Stone’s

spaced reviews helped me remember cultural phrases”) valued retention strategies, and observations recorded

65% of students revisiting tools for recall. Teachers (e.g., Teacher 9: “Some content seemed biased”) identified

inconsistencies, particularly in rural areas where 15% faced access issues, suggesting a need for content and

resource equity.

This finding is consistent with Nafiu and Olaitan [26], who demonstrated that virtual manipulatives and

educational applications improved retention among young learners through repetitive, engaging formats, a

pattern extended here to secondary students with tools like Immersive Reader. The effectiveness of spaced

repetition aligns with Dillman et al. [10], who found that structured digital feedback enhanced memory

retention in diverse educational settings, supporting the TPACK framework’s focus on pedagogical alignment

[16]. The lack of cultural disparities in retention gains corroborates Creswell and Plano Clark [8], who noted

that mixed-methods designs using adaptive technologies minimized equity gaps, a finding reinforced by the

study’s inclusive tool design. Additionally, the 90% agreement on spaced repetition resonates with Field [11],

who highlighted the efficacy of repetitive learning strategies in statistical educational outcomes, suggesting a

robust mechanism for retention across multicultural contexts.

The observed content biases, noted by 20% of students, echo concerns raised by Selwyn [30], who

cautioned that unaddressed disparities in digital content could undermine retention in underserved groups, a

challenge particularly evident in the 15% rural access gap. This finding aligns with Stockwell [33], who

emphasized that equitable access to technology was crucial for sustained learning outcomes, reinforcing the

U.S. Department of Education’s [35] call for infrastructure improvements. The qualitative teacher insights

(e.g., Teacher 4: “Spaced repetition kept students engaged”) support Garrison [12], who argued that CoI’s

cognitive presence, fostered by reflective tool use, enhanced long-term retention, as observed in the 65%

revisit rate. Furthermore, Braun and Clarke [4] validated the thematic analysis approach used here, noting that

emergent themes like bias provided critical insights into retention challenges, suggesting a need for culturally

sensitive content development.

The integration of these findings with prior research highlights the dual nature of digital tools as both enablers

and limiters of retention. Kvale and Brinkmann [18] underscored the importance of student reflections, as seen

in 80% of interviews, in identifying effective strategies and barriers, aligning with the study’s mixed-methods

strength. The 65% observation of tool revisits supports Patton [27], who argued that observational data

enriched understanding of learning behaviors, indicating that spaced repetition was a key driver of retention.

However, the equity gaps suggest a need for policy action, as advocated by AERA [1], to ensure ethical

implementation, particularly in rural settings. Collectively, these connections affirm the study’s findings while

emphasizing the necessity of addressing content and access disparities to fully realize the retention potential of

digital tools in multicultural classrooms.

Findings from the RQ3 documented significant increases in self-efficacy, with overall scores rising from 3.2

(SD = 0.7) to 4.1 (SD = 0.6), yielding a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.88, t(119) = -8.01, p < 0.001), and no

group differences (F(3,116) = 1.05, p = 0.37). Writing showed the highest gain (d = 0.90), likely due to

Grammarly’s detailed feedback, while speaking improved notably (d = 0.86). Surveys reported a grand mean

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8371

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

of 4.18 (SD = 0.54), with 91% of students agreeing that low-stakes practice built self-assurance, though 16%

noted challenges with inclusive design. Qualitatively, 86.7% of interviewees (e.g., Student 3: “Practicing on

Canvas without pressure improved my speaking”) reported confidence gains, and observations noted a 75%

increase in discussion contributions. However, 18% of students, especially ELLs, cited interface mismatches,

and teachers (e.g., Teacher 10: “Some interfaces confused beginners”) highlighted rural access issues affecting

morale.

These findings align with Nafiu and Olaitan [25], who found that digital storytelling and immediate feedback

increased confidence among prekindergarten learners by reducing performance anxiety, a trend mirrored here

with secondary students. The high agreement on low-stakes practice (mean = 4.32) is consistent with

Reinhardt [28], who argued that technology-supported, low-pressure environments enhanced self-efficacy in

second language acquisition, aligning with CoI’s social presence [12]. The equitable confidence gains across

groups support Creswell and Plano Clark [8], who emphasized that mixed-methods approaches using adaptive

tools minimized psychological barriers, a finding reinforced by the study’s inclusive design. Additionally,

Kvale and Brinkmann [18] validated the qualitative depth, noting that student reflections, as seen in 86.7% of

interviews, were pivotal for understanding confidence-building mechanisms, suggesting that tools like Canvas

effectively reduced fear of failure.

The interface challenges reported by 18% of students resonate with Selwyn [30], who highlighted that

technological mismatches in under-resourced settings could erode confidence, a concern particularly relevant

to the rural access issues noted by teachers. This finding aligns with Stockwell [33], who emphasized that

equitable access to user-friendly technology was essential for sustained confidence, supporting the U.S.

Department of Education’s [35] advocacy for infrastructure enhancements. The 75% rise in discussion

participation supports Garrison et al. [13], who found that CoI’s teaching presence, facilitated by guided tool

use, boosted engagement and confidence, a trend observed across diverse cultural groups. Moreover, Field [11]

reinforced the statistical robustness of the self-efficacy gains, noting that large effect sizes like d = 0.88

indicated practical significance, further solidifying the tools’ impact on confidence development.

The integration of these findings with prior research reinforces the potential of digital tools to foster

confidence while highlighting equity gaps. Dillman et al. [10] supported the survey findings, arguing that

positive feedback mechanisms, as seen in the 87% agreement on encouraging feedback, were critical for

psychological growth, a benefit extended to multicultural settings here. The qualitative teacher insights (e.g.,

Teacher 5: “Immersive Reader reduced reading anxiety”) align with Patton [27], who noted that observational

data provided rich context for social learning outcomes, suggesting that tool adaptability was key. However,

the 16% disagreement on inclusive design indicates a need for interface improvements, as advocated by AERA

[1], to ensure ethical and equitable confidence-building, particularly for ELLs and rural students, aligning with

the study’s broader equity focus.

Findings from RQ4 showed that involvement scores increased significantly from 3.4 (SD = 0.8) to 4.3 (SD =

0.7), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.84, t(119) = -7.76, p < 0.001), and no group differences (F(3,116)

= 1.12, p = 0.34). Collaborative engagement showed the highest gain (d = 0.85), driven by tools like Google

Workspace, while group participation improved steadily (d = 0.82). Surveys reported a grand mean of 4.20

(SD = 0.56), with 92% agreeing that platforms promoted active participation in group activities, though 17%

noted challenges with diverse involvement. Qualitatively, 80% of focus group participants (e.g., Focus Group

1: “We discussed stories together”) valued collaboration, and observations recorded a 68% increase in

intercultural exchanges. However, 22% of students in rural areas faced reduced involvement due to device

shortages, as noted by Teacher 12: “Rural students missed out.”

This finding commensurate with Reinhardt [28], who demonstrated that technology integration, such as virtual

manipulatives, fostered collaboration among young learners, a pattern extended here with secondary students

using digital platforms. The high participation rate (mean = 4.35) aligns with Garrison et al. [13], who found

that CoI’s social presence, enhanced by collaborative tools, increased engagement in diverse settings, a trend

supported by the study’s 68% intercultural exchange rate. The equitable involvement gains corroborate

Creswell and Plano Clark [8], who noted that mixed-methods designs using technology minimized social

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8372

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

barriers, aligning with TPACK’s focus on collaborative pedagogy ([24]). Additionally, Nafiu and Olaitan [26]

supported the qualitative insights, arguing that digital tools facilitated peer interactions, as seen in the 80%

focus group approval, enhancing community-building in multicultural contexts.

The rural disparities observed by 22% of students echo Selwyn [30], who emphasized that infrastructure gaps

in low-income areas hindered collaborative learning, a challenge addressed by the U.S. Department of

Education’s [35] call for equitable technology access. This finding aligns with Stockwell [33], who noted that

device availability was crucial for sustained engagement, suggesting that the 68% intercultural exchange rate

could be further improved with resource equity. The teacher insight (e.g., Teacher 6: “Social media features

enhanced community bonds”) supports Garrison [12], who highlighted that CoI’s teaching presence, facilitated

by digital collaboration, strengthened group dynamics, a benefit observed across the study’s diverse sample.

Furthermore, Field [11] validated the statistical significance, noting that effect sizes like d = 0.84 indicated

practical relevance, reinforcing the tools’ impact on involvement.

The integration of these findings with prior research highlights the transformative potential of digital tools in

fostering collaborative communities while underscoring equity needs. Dillman et al. [10] supported the survey

findings, arguing that interactive platforms, as seen in the 89% agreement on group work, enhanced social

learning, a trend extended to multicultural settings here. The qualitative richness from focus groups (e.g.,

Focus Group 1) aligns with Patton [27], who emphasized that group discussions provided nuanced evidence of

collaboration, suggesting that tools like Google Workspace were pivotal. However, the 17% disagreement on

diverse involvement indicates a need for tailored design, as advocated by AERA [1], to ensure ethical and

inclusive participation, particularly in rural areas. Collectively, these connections affirm the study’s findings

while emphasizing the necessity of addressing infrastructural disparities to maximize collaborative learning

outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This mixed-methods study has provided a comprehensive exploration of the role of digital tools in enhancing

language proficiency, promoting long-term retention, fostering confidence, and increasing involvement in

collaborative learning communities among secondary school students in multicultural U.S. classrooms. The

quantitative findings, supported by significant pre/post-test improvements (e.g., TOEFL Junior scores rising

from 72.4 to 85.6, d = 0.92, p < 0.001) and high survey agreement (grand means ranging from 4.15 to 4.21),

demonstrated the effectiveness of tools like Rosetta Stone, Grammarly, and Google Workspace in addressing

diverse linguistic and social needs. Qualitatively, interviews and observations revealed that 85% of students

reported proficiency gains, 80% valued retention strategies, 86.7% noted confidence increases, and 80%

appreciated collaborative engagement, with intercultural exchanges rising by 68%. However, persistent

challenges, such as 20-22% of students facing access issues in rural and low-income settings, underscored

systemic inequities that limit the universal application of these technologies.

The study aligns with Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and the CoI framework, illustrating how digital tools

facilitate social interaction, cognitive presence, and teaching presence to support language development. The

findings echo recent research by Nafiu and Olaitan [25], [26] which highlighted the transformative potential of

interactive technologies in early and secondary education, and Reinhardt [28], who emphasized culturally

responsive technology’s role in reducing disparities. Despite these advances, the identified equity gaps

resonate with Selwyn [30] and Stockwell [33], who noted that infrastructure and resource disparities hinder

technology’s full impact, a concern reinforced by the U.S. Department of Education’s [35] equity agenda. This

study concludes that while digital tools offer a robust framework for enhancing social and linguistic outcomes

in multicultural classrooms, their success hinges on addressing access and design disparities to ensure

inclusive education.

The integration of mixed-methods, quantitative assessments and qualitative narratives, provided a holistic

view, consistent with Creswell and Plano Clark [8], enhancing the reliability and depth of the findings. The 70-

75% increases in participation and discussion contributions suggest that tools not only improve skills but also

foster sociopragmatic competence, as noted by Patton [27]. However, the study faced limitations that temper

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8373

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

its generalizability. The sample was confined to three urban schools, potentially overlooking broader regional

variations in technology access and implementation. Additionally, the reliance on self-reported survey data and

teacher observations may introduce bias, and the short study duration (one academic semester) limits insights

into long-term impacts. These constraints suggest that future research should expand geographically and

longitudinally to validate the findings. Nonetheless, this research contributes to the field by offering empirical

evidence of digital tools’ efficacy while highlighting the need for policy and practice reforms. This

contribution sets a foundation for future studies to explore scalable solutions for equitable technology

integration in diverse educational contexts.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the study’s findings, the following recommendations are proposed to maximize the benefits of digital

tools in multicultural secondary classrooms while addressing identified challenges:

1. Educators and school administrators should integrate digital tools, such as Rosetta Stone, Grammarly,

and Google Workspace, into the curriculum with structured lesson plans that align with state language

arts standards. This approach, supported by Nafiu and Olaitan [25], [26], ensures that tools enhance

proficiency, retention, confidence, and collaboration, as evidenced by the 85.6 mean TOEFL score and

68% intercultural exchange rate. Training programs should focus on TPACK principles to equip teachers

with skills to adapt tools for diverse learners.

2. Schools and policymakers must prioritize infrastructure enhancements to bridge the identified access gap,

particularly in rural and low-income areas. This includes increasing funding for devices and high-speed

internet, aligning with the U.S. Department of Education’s [35] equity goals and Stockwell’s [33] call for

equitable access. Subsidies or loan programs for families, as suggested by Selwyn [30], could ensure all

students benefit from tools like Immersive Reader. Regular audits of technology availability, as

recommended by AERA [1], will help monitor progress and address disparities to enhance inclusive

participation.

3. Comprehensive professional development is essential to support teachers in guiding digital tool use

effectively. Workshops should emphasize culturally responsive pedagogy [25], [26], [28] and CoI

strategies [12], addressing the content bias concerns and enhancing retention and confidence,

Collaboration with technology providers to develop bias-free content, as noted by Dillman et al. [10],

will further support equitable outcomes. Schools should also establish peer mentoring programs to foster

student-led learning and address the ELL interface challenges.

4. Policymakers should enact reforms to sustain these efforts, including national guidelines for technology

integration in secondary education as informed by Creswell and Plano Clark’s [8] mixed-methods

insights. Partnerships with tech companies, as advocated by Patton [27], could provide discounted

resources, while longitudinal studies, building on this research, should evaluate long-term impacts.

REFERENCES

1. AERA. (2011). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research

Association.

2. Blake, R. J. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning.

Georgetown University Press.

3. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.).

Georgetown University Press.

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in

Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

5. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for

teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681

6. Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (Eds.). (2017). The handbook of technology and second language teaching

and learning. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069

7. Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language

learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8374

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd

ed.). SAGE Publications.

9. Crum, S., & Özçelik, Ö. (2024). Social networks as technology-enhanced learning environments for

second language teaching in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in

Learning, 19(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v19i01.42013

10. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode

surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

12. Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research

and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263

13. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment:

Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

14. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Autonomous language learning. Language Learning

& Technology, 15(3), 4–11. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2011/emerging.pdf

15. Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language

education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-

4781.2014.12065.x

16. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge

(TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

17. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in

technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247–254.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.002

18. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing

(3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

19. Lee, J. S. (2020). Informal digital learning of English and strategic competence for cross-cultural

communication: Perception of varieties of English as a mediator. ReCALL, 32(1), 47–62.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000181

20. Li, S. (2017). New technologies and language learning. Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137517685

21. Li, S. (2020). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight-

year review. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(3), 345–375.

https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0012

22. Lin, C., & Warschauer, M. (2016). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality.

Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 124–147.

http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/linwarschauer.pdf

23. Mihaylova, M., Gorin, S., Reber, T., & Rothen, N. (2022). A meta-analysis on mobile-assisted

language learning applications: Benefits and risks. Psychologica Belgica, 62(1), 252–268.

https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1146

24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for

teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-

9620.2006.00684.x

25. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025a). Enhancing early childhood education through technology

integration in U.S. classrooms. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science,

9(3S), 3427–3452. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0253

26. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025b). Perceptions of cloud-based learning facilities among U.S.

college students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 3036–

3053. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0230

27. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th

ed.). SAGE Publications.

28. Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis,

and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000356

29. Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of instructed second language

acquisition. Routledge.

www.rsisinternational.org

Page 8375

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)

ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education

30. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

31. Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2020). Transforming teaching: New skills for online language learning

spaces. International Journal of Learning Technology, 15(1), 4–21.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2020.108389

32. Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English-language teaching and learning. In E.

Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation (pp. 156–175). Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137000873_10

33. Stockwell, G. (2022). Mobile assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts and challenges.

Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652087

34. Tzirides, A. O. (2021). Translanguaging and digital technologies in the realm of language learning. In

M. Montebello (Ed.), Digital pedagogies and the transformation of language education (pp. 137–148).

IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6745-6.ch007

35. U.S. Department of Education. (2024). 2024 National education technology plan.

https://www.ed.gov/technology

36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole,

V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. (Original work

published 1930)

37. Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell

us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 4s12–430. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430

38. Xiang, P. (2023). The role of social media in intercultural communication competence: A study of

Chinese students in Malaysia. Communications in Humanities Research, 19, 108–117.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/19/20231211

39. Zhang, Y., & Dong, C. (2024). Exploring the digital transformation of generative AI-assisted foreign

language education: A socio-technical systems perspective based on mixed-methods. Systems, 12(11),

462. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110462

40. Zhou, J. (2024). Second language teaching in the digital world: Why we need digital technologies?

International Journal of Education and Humanities, 17(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.54097/wj03sq91.